催化学报  2016, Vol. 37 Issue (10): 1651-1655   PDF    
扩展功能
加入收藏夹
复制引文信息
加入引用管理器
Email Alert
RSS
本文作者相关文章
Takashi Fujita
Masanori Horikawa
Takashi Takei
Toru Murayama
HarutaMasatake
Correlation between catalytic activity of supported gold catalysts for carbon monoxide oxidation and metal-oxygen binding energy of the support metal oxides
Takashi Fujita, Masanori Horikawa, Takashi Takei, Toru Murayama, HarutaMasatake     
Department of Applied Chemistry, Graduate School of Urban Environmental Sciences, Tokyo Metropolitan University, 1-1 Minami-Osawa, Hachioji, Tokyo 192-0397, Japan
* Corresponding author. HarutaMasatake, Tel/Fax: +81-42-677-2852; E-mail: haruta-masatake@tmu.ac.jp
Abstract: The effect of a wide variety of metal oxide (MOx) supports has been discussed for CO oxidation on nanoparticulate gold catalysts. By using typical co-precipitation and deposition-precipitation methods and under identical calcination conditions, supported gold catalysts were prepared on a wide variety of MOx supports, and the temperature for 50% conversion was measured to qualitatively evaluate the catalytic activities of these simple MOx and supported Au catalysts. Furthermore, the difference in these temperatures for the simple MOx compared to the supported Au catalysts is plotted against the metal-oxygen binding energies of the support MOx. A clear volcano-like correlation between the temperature difference and the metal-oxygen binding energies is observed. This correlation suggests that the use of MOx with appropriate metal-oxygen binding energies (300-500 kJ/atom O) greatly improves the catalytic activity of MOx by the deposition of Au NPs.
© 2016, Dalian Institute of Chemical Physics, Chinese Academy of Sciences.
Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
Key words: Metal oxide-supported gold nanoparticle catalyst     Support effects     Carbon monoxide oxidation     Volcano-like correlation     Metal-oxygen binding energy    
负载金催化剂上CO氧化反应活性与金属氧化物载体中金属-氧结合能之间的关系
Takashi Fujita, Masanori Horikawa, Takashi Takei, Toru Murayama, HarutaMasatake     
首都大学东京, 城市环境科学研究生院, 应用化学系, 东京192-0397, 日本
摘要:讨论了金属氧化物载体(MOx)对其负载纳米金催化剂(Au/MOx)上CO氧化反应的影响.采用典型的共沉淀法和沉积-沉淀法在完全相同的焙烧条件下制备了一系列MOx负载金催化剂,以CO氧化转化50%时的反应温度(T1/2)定量评价了MOx载体和Au/MOx催化剂的催化活性.进一步将MOx载体与相应Au/MOx催化剂的T1/2值之差对MOx载体的金属-氧结合能做曲线进行关联,发现二者呈明显的火山型关系.这一结果表明,采用具有适当金属-氧结合能(300-500 atom O)的MOx可大大提高沉积于其上的Au纳米颗粒的催化活性.
关键词金属氧化物负载金纳米粒子催化剂     载体效应     一氧化碳氧化     火山型关系     金属-氧结合能    

Metal oxide (MOx)-supported Au nanoparticle (NP) catalysts (Au/MOx) have great potential for environmental purification and green sustainable chemical processes because a lot of Au/MOx are active at room temperature, unlike supported palladium or platinum catalysts [1, 2]. However, the origin of the unique catalytic activity of Au/MOx remains unclear because of the complexity of the various physicochemical parameters affecting its catalytic activity. This lack of understanding limits the applications prospects of this promising catalyst.

To simplify this complexity, many researchers have used CO oxidation as a model reaction because of simple reaction stoichiometry. According to their reports, the physicochemical parameters affecting the catalytic activity are the size of the Au NPs, the interaction between the Au NPs and MOx, and the nature of MOx. Among these parameters, the size of the Au NPs [3, 4] and the Au NPs-MOx interaction [5, 6] have been relatively well-discussed because they can be tuned by the choice of preparation method and calcination conditions. Specifically, to achieve high CO oxidation activity, the Au NPs should be smaller than 5 nm and strongly attached to the appropriate MOx. In contrast, the effect of the MOx support on the catalytic activity of Au/MOx is not yet inadequately understood because of the difficulty in systematically comparing a wide variety of MOx. This difficulty can be attributed to two causes. First, in previous studies, a variety of different preparation procedures have been used to obtain Au/MOx catalysts to compare. Because the preparation procedures strongly affect the catalytic activity, this hampers a simple comparison of the contributions of MOx to each Au/MOx catalyst. Therefore, to enable a systematic comparison, Au catalysts supported on a wide variety of MOx should be prepared using the same preparation method under the same calcination conditions. Co-precipitation and deposition-precipitation [7] are good candidates because both methods are very common and can easily provide the above mentioned highly active Au/MOx catalysts in most cases.

Second, there is limited understanding of the parameters of MOx that affect the catalytic activity of Au/MOx. Some researchers have explored the relevance of various parameters of MOx such as its reducibility [8, 9] and oxygen storage capacity [10]. However, there is no general consensus about which parameters affect the catalytic activity, hindering systematic comparisons between different MOx supports. Therefore, a new parameter of MOx should be proposed to allow us to conduct such a comparison.

Previously, we proposed that oxygen molecules are activated at the perimeter interface between Au NPs and MOx and that the formation of active sites may be related to the presence of oxygen vacancies in the perimeter region [1]. This proposition is strongly supported by several studies investigating Au/TiO2. First, Widmann et al. [11] reported that lattice oxygen at the perimeter interface of Au/TiO2 is easily desorbed in CO atmosphere. Maeda et al. [12] observed oxygen vacancies at the Au/TiO2 interface during CO oxidation. Based on these findings, it is reasonable to suggest that the onset of catalytic activity in Au/MOx depends critically on the desorption of the lattice oxygen at the perimeter interface induced by the deposition of Au NPs on MOx. On the other hand, Saavedra et al. [13] have reported the results of theoretical calculations that oxygen vacancies are not involved in CO oxidation.

In this communication, we aim to provide new insight into the nature of MOx in Au/MOx systems and to improve their application capability. We prepared Au catalysts supported on a wide variety of MOx by using co-precipitation and deposition-precipitation techniques under the same calcination conditions. To isolate the contribution of MOx, we measured and compared the catalytic activities of MOx and Au/MOx for CO oxidation and then discussed the catalytic improvement effect by depositing Au NPs on MOx. To enable a systematic comparison, we introduced the metal-oxygen bonding energy of MOx (EM-O) as an indicator of the ease of lattice oxygen desorption, assuming that EM-O is related to the catalytic activity enhancement induced by the deposition of Au NPs on MOx. This hypothesis was inspired by Balandin volcano plots which reflect the Sabatier principle, which states the reaction kinetics can be correlated with thermodynamic properties of heterogeneous catalysts [14].

For this investigation, a variety of MOx (M: Al, Ti, Cr, Mn, Fe, Co, Ni, Cu, Zn, Zr, Nb, Ru, Rh, Pd, Ag, In, La, Ce, Ir, Pt, and Bi) was choosen. This series, which includes most MOx, excludes SiO2, VOx, MoOx, and WOx. SiO2 was excluded because its catalytic activity is too low to be measured, while VOx, MoOx, and WOx were excluded because of the technical difficulties faced when attempting to deposit Au NPs.

First, Au NPs supported on various MOx (Au/MOx, M: Al, Cr, Fe, Co, Ni, Cu, Zn, Zr, Ru, Rh, Pd, Ag, In, La, Ce, Ir, Pt, and Bi) with Au/M atomic ratios of 1/19 (Au loading: 6-12 wt%) were prepared by co-precipitation [7]. To prepare every Au/MOx except for Au/Ag2O and Au/Bi2O3, 200 mL of a HAuCl4 (1 mmol) aqueous solution was first added to an aqueous solution of M(NO3)x or MClx (19 mmol) and stirred at 343 K. In the preparation of Au/Ag2O, Au(OH)3 (1 mmol) was used as a Au precursor instead of HAuCl4, and in the preparation of Au/Bi2O3, Bi(NO3)3×5H2O was dissolved in an aqueous solution of nitric acid (pH=1) to avoid hydrolysis to form basic salt such as Bi(OH)2×NO3 or (BiO)2(OH)NO3. Next, each mixture was poured into an aqueous solution of Na2CO3 (0.12 mol/L, 200 mL) under vigorous stirring at 343 K, except in the case of Au/Bi2O3. For Au/Bi2O3, the Na2CO3 aqueous solution was substituted by a NaOH aqueous solution (1 mol/L), and the NaOH aqueous solution was then added until the precipitate was completely formed. All of the precipitates were aged at 343 K for 1 h and then washed with distilled water (313 K) until the pH of a supernatant stabilized. The filtrated precipitates were dried at 353 K overnight and then calcined at 573 K for 4 h in air (20 vol% O2 in N2; oxidative atmosphere). The MOx catalysts without gold were also prepared by the same procedure without the addition of the Au precursors.

Au/Nb2O5 was prepared by hydrothermal synthesis [15] at a Au/Nb atomic ratio of 1/19. NH4(NbO(C2O4)2(H2O)2)(H2O)3 (Nb: 6 mmol) and Au(en)2Cl3 (Au: 6/19 mmol) were added to 40 mL of water under stirring. The mixture was placed in a Teflon-lined cylindrical autoclave and then heated at 448 K for 24 h in air. The solid residue was filtered, washed with water, dried at 353 K, and then calcined at 573 K for 4 h in air. Au/Nb2O5 was also prepared by deposition-precipitation [7], and calcined at 573 K for 4 h in air. Au(en)2Cl3 was used as a Au precursor. The gold loading of this catalyst was 1 wt%. Nb2O5 was prepared by the same procedure without the addition of the Au precursor.

Some supported Au catalysts (Au/MOx, M: Al, Ti, Mn, Fe, Zr, and Ce) were provided by Haruta Gold Inc. These catalysts were prepared by deposition-precipitation and had been calcined at 573 K for 4 h in air before receipt. The gold loadings of these catalysts were 1 wt%. TiO2 (Degussa, P25) and MnO2 were purchased from Nippon Aerosil and Chuo Denki, respectively. All the catalysts (prepared and provided) were passed through 120-mesh sieves and pretreated at 523 K for 1 h in air before catalytic activity measurements and characterization.

Catalytic activity measurements for CO oxidation were carried out using a U-shaped glass fixed-bed flow reactor. The mass of the catalyst was 150 mg, and the reaction temperature ranged from 173 to 700 K. The reactant gas (1% CO in air) was passed through the catalytic bed at a rate of 50 mL/min using a mass flow controller (hourly space velocity of 20000 h-1 mL gcat-1). The compositions of the effluent gases were determined by gas chromatography (Ohkura Riken model-802 and Shimadzu GC-8A). The moisture content of the reactant gas was monitored by a dew-point meter (Air Liquid DPO-6) and was controlled in the range from 50 to 200 ppm. X-ray diffraction (XRD) patterns were recorded with a diffractometer (Rigaku RINT-TTR Ⅲ) using a Cu Kα radiation operating at 50 kV and 300 mA over the 2θ range of 10° to 70°.

Fig. 1(a) shows the correlation between the T1/2 values (the temperature for 50% conversion of CO in CO oxidation) of simple MOx and its standard heat of formation per oxygen atom (-△Hf0).T1/2 was measured in a stream of 1 vol% CO in air under a space velocity of 20000 h-1 mL g-1. This parameter enables us to compare the catalytic activities of MOx with widely varying reaction rates. -△Hf0 is often used to represent EM-O[16]. Because the T1/2 of Nb2O5 could not be measured in this experiment due to its low catalytic activity, the temperature required for 7% CO conversion on Nb2O5 is depicted in Fig. 1(a). MOx with -△Hf0 values below 220 kJ/atom O exhibited relatively high catalytic activities, except for Bi2O3, and there was no clear dependence of T1/2 on -△Hf0. Conversely, beyond 220 kJ, a V-shaped correlation between T1/2 and -△Hf0 was observed. The catalytic activities decreased with increasing -△Hf0 from 220 to 470 kJ/atom O and increased with an increase in -△Hf0 above 470 kJ/atom O.

Fig. 1. (a) Correlation between the CO oxidation activities of MOx and -△Hf0 per atom oxygen. T1/2 is the temperature for 50% conversion of CO. *The temperature required for 7% CO conversion on Nb2O5 is depicted. (b) Correlation between the CO oxidation activities of Au/MOx and -△Hf0 per atom oxygen. Black triangles: prepared by co-precipitation. Au/M atomic ratios were 1/19 (Au loading: 6-12 wt%). Blue triangles: prepared by deposition-precipitation. Au loading: 1 wt%. The catalysts were calcined at 573 K for 4 h in air and then pretreated at 523 K for 1 h in a stream of 20% O2 in N2 before catalytic activity measurements. Inset: magnification of the plot for T1/2 values from 200 to 450 K. Reaction conditions: catalyst 150 mg, reactant gas 1 vol% CO in air, flow rate 50 mL/min, SV 20000 h-1 mL g-1, moisture content 50-200 ppm.

CO oxidation on certain simple MOx supports at elevated temperature is often explained by the Mars-van Krevelen mechanism [17]. According to this mechanism, lattice oxygens in the MOx are consumed in the oxidation reaction. Therefore, we assume that the -△Hf0 values of MOx are related to the catalytic activities of the simple MOx for CO oxidation. According to the Sabatier principle [14], volcano dependency is often obtained when plotting the catalytic activity for CO oxidation on simple MOx versus △Hf0. From this view point, the -△Hf0dependency shown in Fig. 1 can be regarded as a volcano curve as a top of Co3O4, although Al2O3, CeO2, and La2O3 deviate upward from this curve. In the left side of Co3O4, incorporation of oxygen was dominant compared to release of oxygen. Therefore, a lot of oxygen vacancies may be formed under reaction condition in the lower -△Hf0 region, although we cannot show a direct evidence for amount of oxygen vacancies. Because oxygen vacancies play an important role for oxygen activation [1, 10, 11], we considered that these MOx showed relatively higher catalytic activity. On the other hand, in the right side of Co3O4, release of oxygen was dominant compared to incorporation of oxygen. In this condition, oxygen vacancies may be not formed very much compared to the MOx with lower -△Hf0. From this reason, we considered that the catalytic activities were decreased with an increase in -△Hf0. However, only this consideration cannot explain why Al2O3, CeO2, and La2O3 deviate from the curve.

Fig. 1(b) shows the correlation between T1/2 and -△Hf0 for Au/MOx. These Au/MOx catalysts were prepared by three different preparation methods: co-precipitation (CP, black triangles), deposition-precipitation (DP, blue triangles), and hydrothermal synthesis (HT, black triangles for Au/Nb2O5). All Au/MOx were calcined at 573 K, which is the same calcination condition used for simple MOx. The Au/MOx prepared by CP (Au loading: 6-12 wt%) were characterized by XRD, and we confirmed that the Au species were deposited as NPs ranging from 4.2 to 10 nm in diameter on MOx using the Scherrer equation from a XRD peak attributable to Au crystal plane (200), except for Au/PtO2 (the peak was not observed) and Au/Nb2O5 (66 nm). The Au/MOx prepared by DP (Au loading: 1 wt%) has been characterized before receipt, and the Au species were deposited as NPs ranging from 1.8 to 4.5 nm in diameter on MOx using a transmission electron microscope (TEM). In these experiments, the difference in the T1/2 values between the two preparation methods (CP and DP) was 100 K at a maximum. Fujitani et al. [18] revealed that the reaction rate on Au/TiO2 was proportional to the perimeter length (below 320 K) between Au NPs and MOx or surface area of Au NPs (above 320 K). We estimated the total perimeter lengths of Au/MOx prepared by both CP and DP (Au/Fe2O3 and Au/CeO2) from loading amount of Au and mean diameter of Au NPs. As a result, the total perimeter lengths of these catalysts were comparable. Thus, we can conclude that the preparation methods do not strongly affect the correlation between T1/2 and -△Hf0, and comparison of the CP and DP results is reasonable under these experimental conditions. Moreover, we also estimated the total perimeter lengths of some Au/MOx (M: CuO, Co3O4, Fe2O3, ZnO, and CeO2). Although total perimeter lengths of Au/CeO2 were about quarter as long as that of other Au/MOx, the total perimeter lengths of these catalysts were almost comparable. Therefore, we considered that the result roughly reflects support effects of MOx.

Except for the case of Au/Bi2O3, the T1/2 values of Au/MOx were within the range of 200 to 450 K. In this range (Fig. 1(b), inset), a volcano-like tendency with the Au/Co3O4 at the top was observed, except in the cases of Au/Cr2O3 and Au/Nb2O5. The results of Au/Cr2O3, Au/Nb2O5, and Au/Bi2O3 deviate from this volcano-like tendency. Notably, Cr2O3, Nb2O5, and Bi2O3 are acidic MOx, and the deposition of Au NPs on acidic MOx using a wet process is very difficult technically. Therefore, these catalysts may include very large Au NPs, or the interaction between Au NPs and MOx may be very weak. In the future, optimization of the preparation methods for these acidic MOx is necessary.

Comparison of Fig. 1(a) with Fig. 1(b) indicates that the catalytic activities of Au NPs supported on noble MOx are similar to those of noble MOx alone. In contrast, the deposition of gold on base MOx markedly enhanced CO oxidation. Gold catalysts supported on base metal oxides exhibit high catalytic activities for CO oxidation. Our result is thus in good agreement with previous reports. These results suggest that the catalytic improvement induced by deposition of Au NPs is strongly dependent on the type of MOx used.

To discuss the catalytic improvement, we focus on the difference (△T1/2) between T1/2 (MOx) and T1/2(Au/MOx) as an index of the effect. Fig. 2 shows the correlation between △T1/2 and -△Hf0. The △T1/2 values of noble MOx were almost zero, whereas those of base MOx were positive. This result indicates that catalytically inert simple MOx were dramatically improved by deposition of Au NPs. Moreover, these values of base MOx showed a clear volcano-like tendency, with TiO2 having the highest △T1/2. According to the above-mentioned discussion about Fig. 1(a), this improvement may be due to formation of oxygen vacancies by deposition of Au NPs.

Fig. 2. Correlation between △T1/2 and M-O bond energy per molar oxygen atom. △T1/2 is the difference between the T1/2 values of Au/MOx and MOx. Black triangles: Au/MOx were prepared by co-precipitation. Blue triangles: Au/MOx were prepared by deposition-precipitation. *The temperatures required for 7% CO conversion on Nb2O5 were used instead of T1/2 values of Nb2O5.

Based on these results, the MOx can be preliminary classified by -△Hf0 as follows. First, the MOx with lower -△Hf0 values are listed (-△Hf0 < 150 kJ/atom O): Ag2O, PtO2, PdO, Rh2O3, IrO2, and RuO2.These MOx do not effectively improve the catalytic activity for CO oxidation by Au NPs deposition, because these noble MOx have very low EM-O. This result may be due to the slow incorporation of oxygen from the gas phase to oxygen vacancies. Moreover, we considered that formation of oxygen vacancies by Au NPs deposition may be not effective because lattice oxygens in noble MOx intrinsically can desorb easily. Second, the MOx with middle -△Hf0 values are listed (-△Hf0=150-500 kJ/atom O): CuO, Co3O4, NiO, MnO2, Fe2O3, In2O3, ZnO, Cr2O3, Nb2O5 and TiO2. These MOx are effective supports for Au/MOx, and their effectiveness increases linearly with -△Hf0. Consequently, TiO2 is the most effective for improving the catalytic activity for CO oxidation by Au NPs deposition. This may mean oxygen vacancies effectively form in these MOx by Au NPs deposition. Moreover, ZnO, Cr2O3, and Nb2O5 may have great potential for improving the catalytic activity by optimization of the preparation method and pretreatment conditions. Third, the MOx with higher -△Hf0 values are listed (-△Hf0 > 500 kJ/atom O): CeO2, ZrO2, Al2O3, and La2O3. These MOx are also effective, but their effectiveness decreases linearly with increasing -△Hf0. Bi2O3 cannot be classified by -△Hf0 because of its low △T1/2 value (-10 K).

Moreover, some MOx have unique characteristics. For example, TiO2, ZnO, and ZrO2 have relatively high oxygen storage capacities. Widmann et al. [9] proposed that the oxygen storage capacity of MOx was correlated with the catalytic activity of Au/MOx for CO oxidation, demonstrating this correlation for four MOx: Au/TiO2 > Au/ZrO2 > Au/ZnO > Au/Al2O3. This ordering is also evident in our results for the improvement effect (Fig. 2). In addition, Cr2O3, Nb2O5, and Bi2O3 are classified in acidic MOx, whereas La2O3 is classified as basic MOx. The acid-base properties of MOx may be related to their catalytic activities. However, it is difficult to make this comparison in this study due to the lack of basic MOx among the investigated catalysts.

To the best of our knowledge, our work provides the first nearly comprehensive comparison of Au/MOx catalysts featuring a wide variety of MOx. To perform a systematic comparison, we attempted to standardize the preparation procedure for Au/MOx as much as possible and introduced EM-O(represented by -△Hf0) as a parameter of MOx. A clear volcano-like correlation was observed between △T1/2 and -△Hf0, which suggests that the selection of MOx with appropriate -△Hf0 (300-500 kJ/atom O) greatly improves the catalytic activity induced by the deposition of Au NPs. Furthermore, this clear correlation implies that EM-O is a good candidate in terms of MOx parameters that affect the catalytic activity of Au/MOx, and such thermodynamic parameters are useful for a primary selection of catalyst candidates. The results of this study are expected to improve the application prospects of these catalysts, and we hope that the present systematic comparison will become a technique of choice in future investigations of MOx in Au/MOx catalysts. Moreover, this systematic work is expected to give a useful policy to design appropriate mixed metal oxides as new support materials for dispersed Au NPs.

References
[1] Haruta M., Faraday Discuss.,2011, 152 :11–32. DOI:10.1039/c1fd00107h
[2] Haruta M., Angew. Chem. Int. Ed.,2014, 53 :52–56. DOI:10.1002/anie.v53.1
[3] Overbury S. H., Schwartz V., Mullins D. R., Yan W., Dai S., J. Catal.,2006, 241 :56–65. DOI:10.1016/j.jcat.2006.04.018
[4] Laoufi I., Saint-Lager M. C., Lazzari R., Jupille J., Rabach O., Garaud S., Cabailh G., Dolle P., Cruguel H., Bally A., J. Phys. Chem. C,2011, 115 :4673–4679. DOI:10.1021/jp1110554
[5] Bamwenda G. R., Tsubota S., Nakamura T., Haruta M., Catal. Lett.,1997, 44 :83–87. DOI:10.1023/A:1018925008633
[6] Liu X. Y., Liu M. H., Luo Y. C., Mou C. Y., Lin S. D., Cheng H. K., Chen J. M., Lee J. F., Lin T. S., J. Am. Chem. Soc.,2012, 134 :10251–10258. DOI:10.1021/ja3033235
[7] Haruta M., Tsubota S., Kobayashi T., Kageyama H., Genet M. J., Delmon B., J. Catal.,1993, 144 :175–192. DOI:10.1006/jcat.1993.1322
[8] Schubert M. M., Hackenberg S., van Veen A. C., Muhler M., Plzak V., Behm R. J., J. Catal.,2001, 197 :113–122. DOI:10.1006/jcat.2000.3069
[9] Maeda Y., Akita T., Kohyama M., Catal. Lett.,2014, 144 :2086–2090. DOI:10.1007/s10562-014-1376-4
[10] Widmann D., Liu Y., Schüth F., Behm R. J., J. Catal.,2010, 276 :292–305. DOI:10.1016/j.jcat.2010.09.023
[11] Widmann D., Belm R. J., Angew. Chem. Int. Ed.,2011, 50 :10241–10245. DOI:10.1002/anie.201102062
[12] Maeda Y., Iizuka Y., Kohyama M., J. Am. Chem. Soc.,2013, 135 :906–909. DOI:10.1021/ja310999c
[13] Saavedra J., Doan H. A., Pursell C. J., Grabow L. C., Chandler B. D., Science,2014, 345 :1599–1602. DOI:10.1126/science.1256018
[14] R. A. van Santen, M. Neurock, in:G. Ertl, H. Knoezinger, F. Schueth, J. Weitkamp eds., Handbook of Heterogeneous Catalysis, 2nd ed., Wiley-VCH, Weinheim, 2008, 1415-1445.
[15] Murayama T., Chen J., Hirata J., Matsumoto K., Ueda W., Catal. Sci. Technol.,2014, 4 :4250–4257. DOI:10.1039/C4CY00713A
[16] Haruta M., Chem. Rec.,2003, 3 :75–87. DOI:10.1002/(ISSN)1528-0691
[17] Ramesh K., Chen L., Chen F., Liu Y., Wang Z., Han Y. F., Catal. Today,2008, 131 :477–482. DOI:10.1016/j.cattod.2007.10.061
[18] Fujitani T., Nakamura I., Angew. Chem. Int. Ed.,2011, 50 :10144–10147. DOI:10.1002/anie.201104694