催化学报  2017, Vol. 38 Issue (3): 583-588   PDF    
扩展功能
加入收藏夹
复制引文信息
加入引用管理器
Email Alert
RSS
本文作者相关文章
Ling Zhang
Xue Liu
Rui-Xia Yang
Nian-Yu Huang
Wei-Qiao Deng
Environmentally benign and economic synthesis of covalent triazine-based frameworks
Ling Zhanga,b, Xue Liub, Rui-Xia Yangb, Nian-Yu Huanga, Wei-Qiao Dengb     
a. Hubei Key Laboratory of Natural Products Research and Development, College of Biological and Pharmaceutical Sciences, China Three Gorges University, Yichang 443002, Hubei, China;
b. State Key Laboratory of Molecular Reaction Dynamics, Dalian Institute of Chemical Physics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Dalian 116023, Liaoning, China
* Corresponding author. Wei-Qiao Deng, Tel: +86-411-84379571; Fax: +86-411-84675584; E-mail: dengwq@dicp.ac.cn
Foundation item: This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (21373202, 21525315)
Abstract: Covalent triazine-based frameworks (CTFs) are important microporous materials with a wide range of applications. Here, we demonstrate an environmentally benign and economic synthetic pathway to CTFs. The monomers used for CTFs, aromatic nitriles, were obtained by cyanation using nontoxic potassium hexacyanoferrate (Ⅱ) in place of commonly used toxic cyanides. Then, the CTFs were synthesized by trimerization of the corresponding cyano monomers in molten zinc chloride. A series of CTFs was synthesized, and the highest Brunauer-Emmett-Teller surface area measured in this series was 2404 m2/g. Among the synthesized CTFs, CTFDCP exhibited excellent CO2 adsorption properties, with a CO2 uptake of 225 mg/g at 0℃.
© 2017, Dalian Institute of Chemical Physics, Chinese Academy of Sciences.
Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
Key words: Covalent triazine-based framework     Aryl bromide     Cyanation     Potassium hexacyanoferrate (Ⅱ)     Palladium acetate    
一种经济环保地合成共价三嗪骨架的方法
张玲a,b, 刘学b, 杨瑞霞b, 黄年玉a, 邓伟侨b     
a. 三峡大学生物与制药学院湖北省天然产物研究与开发重点实验室, 湖北宜昌 443002;
b. 中国科学院大连化学物理研究所分子反应动力学国家重点实验室, 辽宁大连 116023
摘要:近年来, 共价有机骨架材料 (COFs) 由于具有非常好的热化学稳定性、高的孔隙率和比表面积以及可控的表面功能化, 因而在气体存储、分离以及催化等领域拥有潜在的应用价值.共价三嗪骨架材料 (CTFs) 是一种特殊的新型共价有机骨架材料, 它是采用廉价的芳香腈为原料, 在熔融的ZnCl2作用下, 通过离子热聚合反应制成.本文选择不同的二溴代芳烃化合物, 在无毒的K4[Fe (CN)6]·3H2O和微量Pd (OAc)2的作用下, 通过氰基化反应合成相应的二氰基单体, 二氰基单体再聚合获得共价三嗪骨架. 溴代芳烃氰基化转化为芳香氰基化合物的反应中, 我们避免使用有毒的金属氰化物, 用廉价无毒的K4[Fe (CN)6]·3H2O来代替, 并不作任何处理直接使用.同时, 以Pd (OAc)2为催化剂, 不采用任何昂贵的配体, 避免增加实验成本.我们选择1, 4-二溴苯为底物, 探索最佳的反应条件, 包括催化剂用量、溶剂以及反应时间, 以得到最高的转化率和产率, 整个反应过程用GC-MS监测.然后, 扩展底物有芳香杂环化合物2, 6-二溴吡啶和多环芳烃1, 4-二溴萘.上述三种溴代芳烃氰基化后分别得到对应的二氰基单体1, 4-二氰基苯 (DCB), 2, 6-二氰基吡啶 (DCP) 和1, 4-二氰基萘 (DCN).二氰基单体再聚合获得共价三嗪骨架, 依次为CTFDCB, CTFDCP和CTFDCN. 对三种CTF的氮气吸附性能进行了测试, 测得三种聚合物CTFDCB, CTFDCP和CTFDCN的BET比表面积依次为2404, 1650和780 m2/g.其中, 比表面积最大的CTFDCB拥有最大的微孔体积0.85 m3/g, 比表面积最小的CTFDCN的微孔体积也有0.52 m3/g.三种聚合物的孔径分别为0.57, 0.45和0.54 nm.三种材料的CO2吸附性能测试结果表明, 拥有最高N2吸附量的CTFDCB在25和0℃下CO2吸附量分别仅为148和99 mg/g, 而N2吸附量较小的CTFDCP的CO2吸附量反而高达225和154 mg/g, CTFDCN为129和97 mg/g.这表明该类多孔材料的CO2吸附性能不仅与孔体积和比表面积有关, 也与材料中氮原子含量有很大关系.与其它CO2吸附材料相比, 这三种多孔材料的CO2吸附处于一个较高水平.
关键词共价三嗪骨架     芳基溴化物     氰基化反应     六氰合铁 (Ⅱ) 酸钾     醋酸钯    

1 Introduction

The field of microporous materials has recently seen remarkable development owing to the potential applications of these materials in gas storage, separation and catalysis [1-4]. Compared with traditional porous materials, organic microporous materials have the advantages of high specific surface areas, good solubility, diverse synthetic methods and wide applicability [2]. With the ever increasing sophistication of synthetic methods available for the construction of organic porous materials, porous materials with various functions can now be synthesized according to researchers' diverse needs.

Covalent organic frameworks (COFs) are a unique class of crystalline porous organic polymers with inherent porosity and periodic molecular ordering [5-7]. It is, however, difficult to construct crystalline COFs because their syntheses require reversible condensation reactions that have to be carried out under thermodynamic rather than kinetic control [8].

Covalent triazine-based frameworks (CTFs) are a special and emerging class of COFs [9] that are produced by ionothermal trimerization of aromatic polynitriles in molten ZnCl2 to give triazine rings [10]. For example, the first reported CTF, CTF-1 [10], was prepared by trimerization of p-dicyanobenzene. CTFs are gaining an increasing amount of attention because of their excellent chemical and thermal stabilities, ultra-high Brunauer-Emmett-Teller (BET) surface areas and porosities, as well as the high amount of nitrogen functionalities in their networks. Owing to these remarkable properties, CTFs have been applied in many fields, including catalysis [11-13], gas adsorption and storage [14-16], sorbent materials [17, 18], organic semiconductors [19], electrical materials [20, 21] and others [22-24].

To synthesize CTFs on a large scale for potential commercialization, an economical synthetic pathway is required. The key monomers used in CTFs are multiple cyano-substituted benzenes, but these are not available on a large scale. The traditional synthetic routes to cyano-substituted benzenes include Rosenmund von Braun reactions [25-27] from aryl halides, diazotization of anilines and the Sandmeyer reaction [28]. However, these synthetic methodologies are associated with the use of overstoichiometric amounts of toxic cyanides, such as Zn (CN)2[29], CuCN [30], KCN [31], NaCN [32] and trimethylsilyl cyanide (TMSCN) [33], as the cyanide source, which is a serious environmental concern. Recently, nontoxic potassium hexacyanoferrate (Ⅱ) was introduced as a cyanation agent by Beller's group [34-36]. They demonstrated that aryl halides can react with potassium hexacyanoferrate (Ⅱ) to give cyano compounds in the presence of catalytic amounts of palladium catalysts and ligands such as 1, 5-bis (diphenylphosphino) pentane (dpppe), 1, 1′-bis (diphenylphosphino) ferrocene (dppf), triphenylphosphine (PPh3), tricyclohexylphosphine (PCy3) and 2, 2′-bis (diphenylphosphino) diphenyl ether (Bpephos). A drawback of this procedure is the need for expensive ligands, which not only greatly increases the cost of the experiments, but also limits the scale of the reaction. Recently, several triazine-functionalized porous polymers were synthesized using imide-functionalized 1, 3, 5-triazine frameworks and showed high CO2-adsorption capacities [37, 38]. Modak et al. [37] reported a one-pot bottom-up synthetic strategy for the triazine-functionalized porphyrin-based porous organic polymer TPOP-1, which showed a CO2 uptake of up to 6.2 mmol/g at 3 × 105 Pa and 0 ℃. Gomes et al. [38] reported the synthesis of the polymer TRITER-1 by condensation polymerization of 1, 3, 5-tris-(4-aminophenyl) triazine (TAPT) and terephthaldehyde.

In this work, we have developed a new synthetic pathway for CTFs. First, multiple cyano-substituted aromatics were synthesized using inexpensive and nontoxic K4[Fe (CN)6]·3H2O as the cyanide source for cyanation of aryl bromides. This reaction was catalyzed by Pd (OAc)2 without addition of other ligands. Second, CTFs were synthesized by polymerization of the multiple cyano-substituted aromatics in molten ZnCl2, which acts as both a catalyst and a solvent at temperatures of 400-600 ℃ [10]. The obtained CTFs exhibited excellent CO2-adsorption properties.

2 Experimental
2.1 Reagents

All reagents were purchased from Alfa Aesar, J & K Scientific Ltd., Aladdin Reagent and Sigma Aldrich, and were used without further purification. 1, 4-Dicyanobenzene (1b), 2, 6-dicyanopyridine (2b) and 1, 4-dicyanonaphthalene (3b) were prepared from their corresponding aryl bromides with K4[Fe (CN)6]·3H2O in the presence of Pd (OAc)2 according to a previously reported method [34, 39]. 1b-3b were isolated from the reaction mixtures and characterized by 1H NMR and 13C NMR spectroscopy.

2.2 Analytical methods

GC-MS analysis was performed on a GCMS-QP2010SE spectrometer. n-Hexadecane was selected as the internal standard for GC-MS after optimization. The NMR spectra (1H, 400 MHz; 13C, 100 MHz) were recorded on a Bruker Mercury Plus 400-MHz spectrometer. CDCl3 was used as the solvent with tetramethylsilane (TMS) as the internal standard. The synthesis of CTFs was carried out in a muffle burner (TSX1200). The specific surface area of the CTFs was measured on an adsorption instrument (Quantachrome Quadrasorb SI).

2.3 Typical procedure for palladium acetate-catalyzed cyanation of aryl bromides

Aryl bromide (6.0 mmol), K4[Fe (CN)6]·3H2O (2.4 mmol), Na2CO3 (6.0 mmol) and Pd (OAc)2 catalyst (0.2 mol% relative to the aryl bromide) were mixed in NMP (12 mL) in a 25-mL flame-dried double-neck round-bottom flask and heated with stirring at 130 ℃ under argon. The progress of the reaction was monitored by GC-MS. At the end of the reaction, the mixture was cooled to room temperature. Samples were quenched with H2O (or with sat. NH4Cl when pyridines were used as substrates), and extracted with EtOAc (25 mL × 3). The organic layer was washed with water (15 mL × 3) and 5% NH3·H2O (15 mL × 2), and then dried over Na2SO4. Evaporation of the solvent left the crude product, which was further purified by column chromatography over silica gel (60-120 mesh) eluting with petroleum ether/ethyl acetate to afford the pure aryl nitrile.

1, 4-Dicyanobenzene (1b, DCB). 1H NMR (CDCl3, 400 MHz): δ=7.80 (s, 4H); 13C NMR (101 MHz, CDCl3): δ=132.81, 117.00, 116.76.

2, 6-Dicyanopyridine (2b, DCP). 1H NMR (CDCl3, 400 MHz): δ=8.15 (dd, J=8.4, 7.4 Hz, 1H), 7.99 (d, J=7.8 Hz, 2H); 13C NMR (101 MHz, CDCl3):δ=139.13, 135.22, 131.29, 115.53.

1, 4-Dicyanonaphthalene (3b, DCN). 1H NMR (CDCl3, 400 MHz): δ=8.35 (dd, J=6.4, 3.2 Hz, 2H), 7.98 (s, 2H), 7.87 (dd, J=6.4, 3.2 Hz, 2H); 13C NMR (101 MHz, CDCl3): δ=132.00, 131.09, 130.30, 126.03, 116.27, 115.20.

2.4 Synthetic procedure for CTFs

Traditional CTF synthesis has been described elsewhere [10]. In this work, aryl nitriles (7.8 mmol) and anhydrous ZnCl2 (39.0 mmol) were transferred into a quartz ampoule (15 cm3) under an inert atmosphere. The ampoule was evacuated, sealed and heated to 400 ℃ for 20 h and then to 600 ℃ for another 20 h. The ampoule was then cooled to room temperature and opened carefully (Caution: the ampoule is under pressure, which is released on opening). The reaction mixture was then ground and washed thoroughly with large amounts of water to remove most of the ZnCl2. It was then stirred in dilute HCl for 15 h to remove the residual salt. After this purification step, the resulting black powder was filtered, washed successively with water and THF and dried in vacuum at 120 ℃. The yield of the reaction was high ( > 91%) to quantitative.

3 Results and discussion
3.1 Pd (OAc)2-catalyzed cyanation of 1, 4-dibromobenzene with K4[Fe (CN)6]·3H2O

We used 1, 4-dibromobenzene as a model substrate to screen suitable reaction conditions for the cyanation of aryl bromides (Table 1). We obtained similar yields using N, N-dimethylformamide (DMF) and 1-methyl-2-pyrrolidinone (NMP) as the solvent (around 60%, Table 1, Entries 1 and 3); however, the yield decreased to only 41% after replacing the solvent with N, N-dimethylacetamide (DMAc) (Table 1, Entry 2). To our surprise, a high yield of 1, 4-dicyanobenzene was obtained at a relatively low catalyst concentration when the reaction time was prolonged (Table 1, Entries 5 and 6). However, increasing the amount of Pd (OAc)2 led to a decrease in the yield (Table 1, Entries 7-9). This might have been caused by excessive catalyst aggregation and transformation to insoluble palladium black [34, 40]. In practice, the use of (0.1-0.2) mol% ligand-free Pd (OAc)2 gives good yields in the cyanation reaction of 1, 4-dibromobenzene with K4[Fe (CN)6]·3H2O (NMP, Na2CO3, 130 ℃). No desired product was observed when the cyanation was performed in DMSO, toluene or ethylene glycol owing to the poor solubility of 1, 4-dibromobenzene and K4[Fe (CN)6] (Table 1, Entries 10-12). The best reaction conditions were thus determined to be 0.2 mol% Pd (OAc)2 and NMP as the solvent, with a reaction time of 2 h ( > 99%) (Table 1, Entry 4).

Table 1
Optimization of the reaction conditions for the cyanation of 1, 4-dibromobenzene a
3.2 Pd (OAc)2-catalyzed cyanation of aryl bromides with K4[Fe (CN)6]·3H2O

Based on the above result, we extended the substrate scope to heteroaromatic compound 2, 6-dibromopyridine (2a) and polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbon 1, 4-dibromonaphthalene (3a), and the reactions were performed under the optimized reaction conditions (Table 2). Accordingly, 3a was almost completely converted to 1, 4-dicyanonaphthalene (3b). However, the yield of 2, 6-dicyanopyridine (2b) was less than 58%, even after 9 h of reaction time.

Table 2
Pd (OAc)2-catalyzed cyanation of various aryl bromides a
3.3 N2 adsorption of CTFs

CTFDCB, CTFDCP [10] and CTFDCN frameworks (Table 2) were synthesized by heating a mixture of the nitrile monomers DCB, DCP and DCN and ZnCl2 in quartz ampules at 400-600 ℃ for 40 h. The molten ZnCl2 acts as both solvent and catalyst for the self-polymerization of the triazine rings. The molar ratio of ZnCl2 to the nitrile monomer was 5:1, which allowed the reaction to proceed smoothly.

The porosity, that is, the surface area and pore volume, and the pore size distribution of all CTFs were characterized by N2 adsorption measurements (Fig. 1). All CTFs were outgassed in vacuum at 150 ℃ for 10 h, and the results are listed in Table 3. As shown in Fig. 1(a), the N2 isotherms indicate that the three polymers are microporous; this is also demonstrated by the sharp adsorption/desorption step in the low relative pressure region (P/P0=0-0.05). The isotherms for CTFDCB and CTFDCN also exhibit hysteresis loops, which indicate the presence of mesopores. The H2-type hysteresis loops present in the CTFDCB and CTFDCN desorption isotherms may be caused by the different mechanisms of the condensation and evaporation processes in the micro-and mesopores [41]. The surface areas of the CTFs, calculated using the BET equation, were 2404, 1650 and 780 m2/g for CTFDCB, CTFDCP and CTFDCN, respectively. The pore size distributions of CTFDCB, CTFDCP and CTFDCN were calculated by HK methods. As shown in Fig. 1(b), all three CTFs exhibit small micropore diameters centered around 0.5 nm; for example, CTFDCB had a maximum pore size of 0.57 nm. Moreover, the overall micropore volume of CTFDCB was 0.85 cm3/g, and those of CTFDCP and CTFDCN were 0.76 and 0.52 cm3/g, respectively (Table 3). The porosity and texture of the CTFs were homogeneous and the presence of small micropores was confirmed by the high-resolution transmission electron microscopy images shown in Fig. 2.

Fig. 1. (a) N2 adsorption isotherms of CTFs at-196 ℃; (b) Pore size distributions of CTFDCB, CTFDCP and CTFDCN
Table 3
Porosity data for CTFs from N2 isotherms measured at-196 ℃
Fig. 2. High-resolution transmission electron micrographs of CTFDCB (a), CTFDCP (b) and CTFDCN (c)
3.4 CO2 adsorption of CTFs

As shown in Fig. 3(a) and (b), CO2 adsorption by CTFs was also investigated using volumetric methods at 0 and 25 ℃. All of the CTFs showed reversible CO2 adsorption isotherms. The CO2 uptake of CTFDCP, which was synthesized from 2, 6-dicyanopyridine, reached 225 and 154 mg/g under 1 x 105 Pa at 0 and 25 ℃, respectively. However, the CO2 uptake of CTFDCB, which had the highest BET surface area among the three CTFs studied, was only 148 mg/g at 0 ℃ and 99 mg/g at 25 ℃, close to the 129 mg/g at 0 ℃ and 97 mg/g at 25 ℃ measured for CTFDCN. The high adsorption ability of CTFDCP, compared with those of CTFDCB and CTFDCN, derives from the extra nitrogen atoms in the structure, which serve as active alkali sites and attract CO2 molecules [42]. Comparison of the CO2 uptake of these CTFs with those of metal organic frameworks (MOFs), conjugated microporous polymers (CMPs)[43] and zeolites [44], as well as those obtained under identical conditions for our previously reported CMPs, Co-CMP and Al-CMP [45], shows that the CTFs have good CO2capture abilities at both 0 and 25 ℃ (Table 4). To better understand the adsorption properties, the isosteric heats of adsorption were calculated using a variant of the Clausius Clapeyron equation [46] from fits of the CO2 isotherms at different temperatures. As shown in Fig. 3(c), the isosteric heats of CO2 adsorption on CTFDCB, CTFDCN and CTFDCP were calculated to be in the range 18.4-23.5, 20.7-24.1 and 22.5-25.3 kJ/mol, respectively. CTFDCP had the highest isosteric heat of CO2 adsorption, which is consistent with its large CO2-uptake capacity.

Fig. 3. CO2 adsorption isotherms of CTFs at 0 ℃ (a) and 25 ℃ (b), and corresponding heats of adsorption (c)
Table 4
Comparison of the CO2 adsorption performance of other common adsorbents measured under 1 × 105 Pa at 0 or 25 ℃
4 Conclusions

We have developed an environmentally friendly method for the direct synthesis of multiple cyano-substituted aromatic compounds. This method uses palladium acetate without any additional ligands as the catalyst and nontoxic potassium hexacyanoferrate (Ⅱ) as the cyanide source, thus removing the need for special precautions. Notably, aromatic nitriles could be obtained in excellent yields using catalyst amounts of only (0.2-0.4) mol%. Moreover, three CTFs were synthesized from the obtained cyano-aromatic compounds. These CTFs exhibited high specific surface areas and excellent CO2 absorption abilities. Furthermore, the synthesized porous polymers had good stability and multiple active sites for metal coordination; we thus expect them to find application in catalyst supports.

References
[1] Wood C. D., Tan B., Trewin A., Niu H. J., Bradshaw D., Rosseinsky M. J., Khimyak Y. Z., Campbell N. L., Kirk R., Stöckel E., Cooper A. L., Chem. Mater., 2007, 19: 2034–2048. DOI:10.1021/cm070356a
[2] Thomas A., Angew. Chem. Int. Ed., 2010, 49: 8328–8344. DOI:10.1002/anie.201000167
[3] Zhou D., Liu Q., Cheng Q. Y., Zhao Y. C., Cui Y., Wang T., Han B. H., Chin. Sci. Bull., 2012, 57: 3059–3064. DOI:10.1007/s11434-012-5158-3
[4] Luo Y. L., Li B. Y., Wang W., Wu K. B., Tan B., Adv. Mater., 2012, 24: 5703–5707. DOI:10.1002/adma.v24.42
[5] Côté A. P., Benin A. I., Ockwig N. W., O'Keeffe M., Matzger A. J., Yaghi O. M., Science, 2005, 310: 1166–1170. DOI:10.1126/science.1120411
[6] Kuang J., Liu L. Q., Gao Y., Zhou D., Chen Z., Han B. H., Zhang Z., Nanoscale, 2013, 5: 12171–12177. DOI:10.1039/c3nr03379a
[7] Dalapati S., Addicoat M., Jin S. B., Sakurai T., Gao J., Xu H., Irle S., Seki S., Jiang D. L., Nat. Commun., 2015, 6: 7786. DOI:10.1038/ncomms8786
[8] Bojdys M. J., Wohlgemuth S. A., Thomas A., Antonietti M., Macromolecules, 2010, 43: 6639–6645. DOI:10.1021/ma101008c
[9] Xu H., Chen X., Gao J., Lin J. B., Addicoat M., Irle S., Jiang D. L., Chem. Commun., 2014, 50: 1292–1294. DOI:10.1039/C3CC48813F
[10] Kuhn P., Antonietti M., Thomas A., Angew. Chem. Int. Ed., 2008, 47: 3450–3453. DOI:10.1002/(ISSN)1521-3773
[11] Wang X. Y., Liu Q., Jiang J. X., Jin G. J., Li H. F., Gu F. N., Xu G. W., Zhong Z. Y., Su F. B., Catal. Sci. Technol., 2016, 6: 3529–3543. DOI:10.1039/C5CY01482D
[12] Chan-Thaw C. E., Villa A., Katekomol P., Su D. S., Thomas A., Prati L., Nano Lett., 2010, 10: 537–541. DOI:10.1021/nl904082k
[13] Kamiya K., Kamai R., Hashimoto K., Nakanishi S. J., Nat. Commun., 2014, 5: 5040. DOI:10.1038/ncomms6040
[14] Zhao Y. F., Yao K. X., Teng B. Y., Zhang T., Han Y., Energy Environ. Sci., 2013, 6: 3684–3692. DOI:10.1039/c3ee42548g
[15] Bhunia A., Vasylyeva V., Janiak C., Chem. Commun., 2013, 49: 3961–3963. DOI:10.1039/c3cc41382a
[16] Hug S., Mesch M. B., Oh H., Popp N., Hirscher M., Senker J., Lotsch B. V., J. Mater. Chem. A, 2014, 2: 5928–5936. DOI:10.1039/C3TA15417C
[17] Ren H., Ben T., Wang E. S., Jing X. F., Xue M., Liu B. B., Cui Y., Qiu S. L., Zhu G. S., Chem. Commun., 2010, 46: 291–293. DOI:10.1039/B914761F
[18] Bhunia A., Dey S., Bous M., Zhang C. Y., von Rybinski W., Janiak C., Chem. Commun., 2015, 51: 484–486. DOI:10.1039/C4CC06393G
[19] Tao L. M., Niu F., Zhang D., Wang T. M., Wang Q. H., New J. Chem., 2014, 38: 2774–2777. DOI:10.1039/c4nj00476k
[20] Hao L., Luo B., Li X. L., Jin M. H., Fang Y., Tang Z. H., Jia Y. Y., Liang M. H., Thomas A., Yang J. H., Zhi L. J., Energy Environ. Sci., 2012, 5: 9747–9751. DOI:10.1039/c2ee22814a
[21] Sakaushi K., Hosono E., Nickerl G., Gemming T., Zhou H. S., Kaskel S., Eckert J., Nat. Commun., 2013, 4: 1485. DOI:10.1038/ncomms2481
[22] Jiang X., Wang P., Zhao J. J., J. Mater. Chem. A, 2015, 3: 7750–7758. DOI:10.1039/C4TA03438D
[23] Hao L., Zhang S. S., Liu R. J., Ning J., Zhang G. J., Zhi L. J., Adv. Mater., 2015, 27: 3190–3195. DOI:10.1002/adma.201500863
[24] Liu J. L., Hu Y. J., Cao J. J., Catal. Commun., 2015, 66: 91–94. DOI:10.1016/j.catcom.2015.03.027
[25] Rosenmund K. W., Struck E., Ber. Dtsch. Chem. Ges., 1919, 52: 1749–1756. DOI:10.1002/cber.19190520840
[26] Mowry D. T., Chem. Rev., 1948, 48: 189–283.
[27] Galli C., Chem. Rev., 1988, 88: 765–792. DOI:10.1021/cr00087a004
[28] Hodgson H. H., Chem. Rev., 1947, 40: 251–277. DOI:10.1021/cr60126a003
[29] Lindley J., Tetrahedron, 1984, 40: 1433–1456. DOI:10.1016/S0040-4020(01)91791-0
[30] Sundermeier M., Zapf A., Beller M., Sans J., Tetrahedron Lett., 2001, 42: 6707–6710. DOI:10.1016/S0040-4039(01)01390-9
[31] Sundermeier M., Mutyala S., Zapf A., Spannenberg A., Beller M., J. Organomet. Chem., 2003, 684: 50–55. DOI:10.1016/S0022-328X(03)00503-5
[32] Srivastava R. R., Collibee S. E., Tetrahedron Lett., 2004, 45: 8895–8897. DOI:10.1016/j.tetlet.2004.09.184
[33] Yu H., Richey R. N., Miller W. D., Xu J. S., May S. A., J. Org. Chem., 2011, 76: 665–668. DOI:10.1021/jo102037y
[34] Schareina T., Zapf A., Beller M., Chem. Commun., 2004, 12: 1388–1389.
[35] Schareina T., Zapf A., Beller M., J. Organomet. Chem., 2004, 689: 4576–4583. DOI:10.1016/j.jorganchem.2004.08.020
[36] Schareina T., Jackstell R., Schulz T., Zapf A., Cott A., Gotta M., Beller M., Adv. Synth. Catal., 2009, 351: 643–648. DOI:10.1002/adsc.v351:4
[37] Modak A., Pramanik M., Inagaki S., Bhaumik A., J. Mater. Chem. A, 2014, 2: 11642–11650. DOI:10.1039/C4TA02150A
[38] Gomes R., Bhanja P., Bhaumik A., Chem. Commun., 2015, 51: 10050–10053. DOI:10.1039/C5CC02147B
[39] Gerber R., Oberholzer M., Frech C. M., Chem. Eur. J., 2012, 18: 2978–2986. DOI:10.1002/chem.201102936
[40] de Vries A. H. M., Mulders J. M. C. A., Mommers J. H. M., Henderickx H. J. W., de Vries J. G., Org. Lett., 2003, 5: 3285–3288. DOI:10.1021/ol035184b
[41] Bhunia A., Boldog I., Möller A., Janiak C., J. Mater. Chem. A, 2013, 1: 14990–14999. DOI:10.1039/c3ta13407e
[42] Dawson R., Stockel E., Holst J. R., Adams D. J., Cooper A. I., Energy Environ. Sci., 2011, 4: 4239–4245. DOI:10.1039/c1ee01971f
[43] Sumida K., Rogow D. L., Mason J. A., McDonald T. M., Bloch E. D., Herm Z. R, Bae T. H., Long J. R., Chem. Rev., 2012, 112: 724–781. DOI:10.1021/cr2003272
[44] Xu X. C., Song C. S., Andresen J. M., Miller B. G., Scaroni A. W., Microporous Mesoporous Mater., 2003, 62: 29–45. DOI:10.1016/S1387-1811(03)00388-3
[45] Xie Y., Wang T. T., Liu X. H., Zou K., Deng W. Q., Nat. Commun., 2013, 4: 1960.
[46] Zhu X., Tian C. C., Mahurin S. M., Chai S. H., Wang C. M., Brown S., Veith G. M., Luo H. M., Liu H. L., Dai S., J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2012, 134: 10478–10484. DOI:10.1021/ja304879c