催化学报  2017, Vol. 38 Issue (11): 1794-1803   PDF    
扩展功能
加入收藏夹
复制引文信息
加入引用管理器
Email Alert
RSS
本文作者相关文章
Ming Ge
Zhenlu Li
Recent progress in Ag3PO4-based all-solid-state Z-scheme photocatalytic systems
Ming Gea,b, Zhenlu Lia     
a. College of Chemical Engineering, North China University of Science and Technology, Tangshan 063210, Hebei, China;
b. Hebei Key Laboratory of Photocatalytic and Electrocatalytic Materials for Environment, Tangshan 063210, Hebei, China
* Corresponding author. Ming Ge, Tel: +86-315-8805466; Fax: +86-315-4465425; E-mail: geminggena@163.com
Foundation item: This work was supported by the Youth Foundation of Hebei Education Department (QN2017115), and the National Natural Science Foundation of China (51504079)
Abstract: Heterogeneous semiconductor photocatalysis is a promising green technology solution to energy and environmental problems. Traditional photocatalyst TiO2, with a wide band gap of 3.2 eV, can only be excited by UV light and utilizes less than 4% of solar energy. Silver phosphate (Ag3PO4) is among the most active visible-light-driven photocatalysts reported. Unfortunately, unwanted pho-tocorrosion is the main obstacle to the practical application of Ag3PO4. Much effort has been made in recent years to address this issue and further enhance the photocatalytic performance of Ag3PO4. The construction of Z-scheme photocatalytic systems that mimic natural photosynthesis is a prom-ising strategy to improve the photocatalytic activity and stability of Ag3PO4. This brief review con-cisely summarizes and highlights recent research progress in Ag3PO4-based all-solid-state Z-scheme photocatalytic systems with or without a solid-state electron mediator, focusing on their construc-tion, application, and reaction mechanism. Furthermore, the challenges and future prospects of Ag3PO4-based Z-scheme photocatalytic systems are discussed.
© 2017, Dalian Institute of Chemical Physics, Chinese Academy of Sciences.
Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
Key words: Silver phosphate     Photocatalysis     Z-scheme system     Application     Mechanism    
基于Ag3PO4的全固态Z型光催化体系研究进展
葛明a,b, 李振路a     
a. 华北理工大学化学工程学院, 河北唐山 063210;
b. 河北省环境光电催化材料重点实验室, 河北唐山 063210
摘要:随着现代工业的迅猛发展, 人类面临的能源危机和环境污染问题日益严重.光催化剂技术有望利用太阳能同时解决这两大问题, 其关键在于设计高效的光催化体系.传统光催化材料TiO2具有价廉、活性高及稳定性好等优点, 然而其带隙宽(Eg=3.2 eV), 仅能利用占太阳光谱约4%的紫外光, 从而限制其利用太阳能.可见光占太阳光谱的40%以上, 因此开发可见光响应的光催化材料成为光催化领域研究焦点. 2010年, 叶金花课题组报道了Ag3PO4在可见光照射下可高效分解水产氧及降解水体中有机污染物, 从而使其迅速成为研究热点.Ag3PO4是目前为止报道的光量子效率最高的可见光响应的催化材料, 带隙能在2.3~2.5 eV范围内, 其高效的光催化活性归结于其独特的电子结构利于光生电荷的分离及转移.然而, 由于Ag3PO4本身易光蚀, 稳定性差, 必然限制其实际应用.近年来, 为在进一步提升Ag3PO4活性的基础上增强稳定性, 研究者通过多种方法对其进行修饰, 包括贵金属沉积、碳材料修饰、负载及半导体异质复合等.相对于前面几种修饰方法, 半导体复合相对高效且成本低.半导体复合主要构成Ⅱ型异质结构和Z型光催化体系.Ⅱ型异质结构由于内建电场的存在可以促进光生电荷的定向转移, 从而提高光生电荷的分离效率, 进而提高光催化活性.然而, 这种电荷的定向迁移会降低光生电荷的氧化还原能力. 模拟绿色植物的光合作用过程, 一种全固态Z型光催化体系应运而生, 其是将两种导带和价带位置匹配的可见光驱动的催化剂分别作为光催化系统Ⅰ (PS Ⅰ)和光催化系统Ⅱ (PS Ⅱ), 同时选用导电性能优良的材料(Ag, Au和RGO等)作为电子介体.可见光照条件下, PS Ⅰ和PS Ⅱ均被激发产生电子和空穴, PS Ⅱ导带上的电子通过电子介质与PS Ⅰ价带空穴复合, 一方面抑制了PS Ⅰ和PS Ⅱ本身电子和空穴的复合, 另一方面保留了PS Ⅰ导带电子的强还原性和PS Ⅱ价带空穴的强氧化性.另外, PS Ⅰ和PS Ⅱ紧密结合形成具有准连续能级的固-固接触界面, PS Ⅱ导带上的电子直接与PS Ⅰ价带空穴复合, 形成无电子介体的直接Z型光催化体系. Ag3PO4价带顶相对靠下, 氧化能力强, 往往作为PS Ⅱ组分, 其与导带顶相对靠上的催化剂(PS Ⅰ)构成Z型体系, 这样Ag3PO4导带电子可与PS Ⅰ的价带空穴复合, 减弱电子对Ag3PO4本身的还原, 提高其稳定性; 另一方面, Ag3PO4价带空穴可参与氧化反应.基于Ag3PO4的Z型体系主要以Ag作为电子介体, 归因于在制备及光催化过程中原位产生的少量Ag可直接作为电子介体.此外, 还原氧化石墨烯(RGO)也可作为电子介体, 并且其存在可进一步提高Ag3PO4的稳定性.需要指出的是, 基于Ag的等离子体共振效应, Ag3PO4基等离子体Z型光催化体系也受到关注. 目前, Z型光催化体系处在发展阶段, 必然存在一些问题, 比如, Ⅱ型异质光催化体系与直接Z型光催化体系如何区分, 有待进一步研究.另外, 报道的基于Ag3PO4的Z型体系主要用来光催化降解水体中的有机污染物, 催化剂的回收再利用受到限制, 今后可开发磁性Ag3PO4基Z型体系, 解决回收再利用的问题; 另外, 通过能带调控, 可将基于Ag3PO4的Z型体系多用于光催化产氢、还原CO2及处理有害气体.
关键词磷酸银    光催化    Z型体系    应用    机理    

1 Introduction

Heterogeneous semiconductor photocatalysis is considered a promising technology due to its great potential to solve energy and environmental problems [1, 2]. Traditional photocatalyst TiO2 is low cost, highly photocatalytically active, and shows excellent chemical and photochemical stabilities [3, 4]. However, the wide band gap of TiO2 renders it responsive to only UV light, which accounts for only 4% of solar light. Meanwhile, the visible light region comprises 43% of the entire solar spectrum. Accordingly, much research is currently focused on the manufacture of efficient visible-light-response photocatalysts for the utilization of solar energy [5-8].

Among well-known visible-light-driven photocatalysts, silver orthophosphate (Ag3PO4), has attracted increasing attention since first being reported by Ye et al. [9] in 2010. Ag3PO4 has a body-centered cubic structure with space group P4-3n [10]. As shown in Fig. 1, all atoms are in four-coordinate environments, with the Ag atom coordinated by four O atoms, the P atoms coordinated by four O atoms, and the O atoms coordinated by three Ag atoms and one P atom [11]. Ag3PO4 has an indirect band gap of 2.36 eV and direct transition of 2.43 eV, and is considered a promising visible-light-driven photocatalyst [10]. Under visible light illumination, Ag3PO4 can achieve a quantum efficiency of ~90% for water oxidation using AgNO3 as the electron acceptor [9], which is much higher than that of the other reported visible-light-driven photocatalysts [12]. In our previous work, under simulated solar light or visible LED light, Ag3PO4 drastically degraded dye pollutants in a short time [13, 14]. Ag3PO4 has excellent photocatalytic activity due to its superior electronic structure characteristics [10]. Using density-functional-theory-based calculations, Umezawa et al. [15] concluded that the excellent photocatalytic performance of Ag3PO4 was partly attributed to the highly dispersive band structure of the conduction-band minimum (CBM), which results from Ag s/Ag s hybridization without localized d states. Zhu et al. [11] employed first-principles density functional theory incorporating the LDA+U formalism to investigate the origin of Ag3PO4 photocatalytic activation. They demonstrated that Ag3PO4 has a highly disperse conduction band and the PO43- inductive effect, which helps separate electron/hole pairs. Furthermore, the defect states of Ag vacancies act as capture traps for photoexcited holes, which promotes the separation of electron/hole pairs excited by visible-light irradiation.

Fig. 1. Crystal structure of Ag3PO4 with (a) ball-stick and (b) polyhedron representations (red, purple, and blue spheres represent O, P, and Ag atoms, respectively) [11].
Fig. 2. (a) Charge transfer in a type-Ⅱ heterojunction; (b) Charge separation mechanism in natural photosynthesis [28]; (c) Schematic diagram of a Z-scheme system with shuttle redox mediators.

Although Ag3PO4 possesses outstanding visible-light-driven photocatalytic performance, the photocorrosion of Ag3PO4 is the main obstacle to its practical application [10, 12]. The conduction band (CB) of Ag3PO4is located at +0.45 V vs. NHE (normal hydrogen electrode, pH = 0), indicating that H2O cannot be reduced to H2 by Ag3PO4. Therefore, the electrons in the Ag3PO4 CB can reduce Ag+ ions released from the crystal lattice of Ag3PO4 to Ag. This phenomenon destroys the Ag3PO4 structure and decreases its photocatalytic performance [10]. To meet industrial requirements, much effort has been devoted to further enhance the photocatalytic performance and stability of Ag3PO4, including metal deposition [16, 17], assembly with carbon materials [18-20], immobilization on support materials [21, 22], and combination with other semiconductors to form type-Ⅱ heterojunctions or Z-scheme systems [10, 12, 23]. In particular, mimicking natural photosynthesis in Ag3PO4-based all-solid-state Z-scheme systems could produce a wide absorption range, high charge-separation efficiency, strong redox ability, and long-term stability [23]. In this brief review, we provide an overview of the main achievements in Ag3PO4-based Z-scheme photocatalytic systems, focusing on their construction, application, and reaction mechanism, followed by a brief discussion of the future development of this class of photocatalytic system.

2 Derivation and mechanism of all-solid-state Z-scheme photocatalytic system

Photocatalytic reaction processes mostly involve three steps. (ⅰ) Generation of electrons and holes through the absorption of light with higher energy than the band gap of the semiconductor photocatalyst; (ⅱ) charge separation and migration onto the photocatalyst surface; and (ⅲ) reduction/oxidation reactions on the photocatalyst surface [24, 25]. To utilize solar light, the band gap of the photocatalyst must be narrow. However, a narrow band gap allows photogenerated electrons and holes to easily recombine. Therefore, it is difficult for a single photocatalyst to simultaneously utilize solar light and possess high photocatalytic activity. This problem can be overcome by constructing heterogeneous photocatalytic systems (usually type-Ⅱ heterojunctions) [26]. In a type-Ⅱ heterostructured photocatalyst system (Fig. 2(a)) under visible light irradiation, photoinduced electrons (e-) in the CB of photocatalyst Ⅰ (PC Ⅰ) can transfer to the CB of photocatalyst Ⅱ (PC Ⅱ), while holes (h+) in the valence band (VB) of PC Ⅱ can migrate to the VB of PC Ⅰ, which promotes the effective separation of electrons and holes, resulting in enhanced photocatalytic performance [26]. Although the recombination of electrons and holes is inhibited in type-Ⅱ heterostructured photocatalytic systems, the redox ability of photogenerated electrons and holeson reaction sites is decreased after migration (Fig. 2(a)) [23, 27]. Therefore, it is necessary to design and explore new photocatalytic systems to solve these problems. By mimicking natural photosynthesis, a newly-developed Z-scheme photocatalytic system can satisfy the aforementioned requirements [23, 27].

In nature, H2O and CO2 are converted into O2 and carbohydrate through photosynthesis in green plants (Fig. 2(b)). This photosynthetic process, which looks like the letter "Z", is known as the Z-scheme system. As shown in Fig. 2(b), photosystems Ⅰ (PS Ⅰ) and Ⅱ (PS Ⅱ) are excited by solar light irradiation, and the photogenerated electrons jump to a higher electronic state (excitation), which is connected to an electron transfer chain (electron mediator). The electrons in PS Ⅰ flow from the electron transport chain, leading to the reduction of coenzyme NADP+ into NADP, which reduces CO2 to carbohydrate, while water oxidation occurs in PS Ⅱ [28, 29]. Mimicking the natural photosynthesis of green plants, the artificial Z-scheme photocatalytic system has been explored, and was first used for water splitting, with an electron acceptor/donor (A/D) usually serving as the electron mediator [30-32]. As shown in Fig. 2(c), two different narrow-bandgap semiconductor photocatalysts are selected as PS Ⅰ and PS Ⅱ. Under visible light irradiation, photoinduced electron transfer from the CB of PS Ⅱ to the VB of PS Ⅰ is dependent on the redox reactions of the A/D pair. Therefore, the electron in the CB of PS Ⅰ and the hole in the VB of PS Ⅱ participate in water splitting. Commonly used A/D pairs are IO3-/I-, Fe3+/Fe2+, and NO3-/NO2-[23]. These redox mediators can strongly absorb visible light, decreasing the light absorption of the photocatalysts (PS Ⅰ and PS Ⅱ), making it difficult to maintain long-term stability and active states of these A/D pairs. Furthermore, this Z-scheme system (Fig. 2(c)) cannot be used to degrade pollutants in solution because the pollutants can hinder the redox reaction of the A/D pair. Accordingly, all-solid-state Z-scheme photocatalytic systems have been developed.

As shown in Fig. 3(a), two different narrow band gap photocatalysts were used as PS Ⅰ and PS Ⅱ. A solid conductor between the two photocatalysts forming the ohmic contact was employed as a solid-state electron mediator [23]. Under visible light, the electrons can be simultaneously excited from the VB of both PS Ⅰ and PS Ⅱ to the CB, leaving holes in the VB. The electrons from the CB of PS Ⅱ can directly recombine with the holes from the VB of PS Ⅰ through the ohmic contact [23, 32]. Therefore, the recombination of electrons and holes is inhibited within PS Ⅰ or PS Ⅱ, such that electrons in the CB of PS Ⅰ and holes in the VB of PS Ⅱ can be mostly reserved for forward reduction and oxidation reactions (Fig. 3(a)), respectively. Moreover, in this system, the shielding effect of irradiated incident light caused by the A/D pair can be eliminated. Without this limitation, all-solid-state Z-scheme systems can be used in both the gas and liquid phase.

Fig. 3. (a) Schematic illustration of an all-solid-state Z-scheme system with a conductor as the electron mediator. (b) Schematic illustration of a direct Z-scheme system.

As many defects can aggregate at the solid/solid contact interface, the energy levels of the solid/solid contact interface are quasicontinuous, which is similar to in a conductor. This indicates that the solid/solid contact interface has some properties similar to conductors. Therefore, the solid/solid contact interface can also form the ohmic contact [23]. Without a conductor as the electron mediator, a direct Z-scheme photocatalytic system can be formed when PS Ⅰ directly contacts PS Ⅱ (Fig. 3(b)). Similarly, the direct Z-scheme photocatalytic system can also retain oxidative holes and reductive electrons in different counterparts (Fig. 3(b)), resulting in enhanced photocatalytic activity. Evidently, all-solid-state Z-scheme photocatalytic systems can solve the problems of single photocatalyst and type-Ⅱ heterostructured photocatalytic systems (Fig. 3).

Ag3PO4 has a very deep valence band, located at approximately +2.9 V vs. NHE (pH = 0), making it well aligned for oxidation reactions [12]. Ag3PO4 is used as PS Ⅱ and coupled with a suitable visible-light-driven photocatalyst (PS Ⅰ) to form the Z-scheme system. Therefore, the photogenerated electrons in the CB of Ag3PO4 can recombine with the holes from PS Ⅰ, resulting in the improved photostability of Ag3PO4. Furthermore, the leaving holes in the VB of Ag3PO4 can retain the strong oxidizability, allowing the photocatalytic oxidation of water and organic pollutants [10, 12]. Therefore, Ag3PO4-based Z-scheme photocatalytic systems show great potential for solving energy and environmental problems in the future.

3 Ag3PO4-based Z-scheme photocatalytic systems with a conductor as electron mediator

In Ag3PO4-based Z-scheme photocatalytic systems, metal Ag conductor has always been used as the electron mediator because Ag nanoparticles can be generated in situ during preparation or produced by the photoreduction of Ag3PO4 in the photocatalytic process. Recent progress in Ag3PO4-based Z-scheme photocatalytic systems with solid state electron mediators are summarized in Table 1.

Table 1
Recent work on Ag3PO4-based Z-scheme photocatalytic systems with solid state electron mediators.

In recent years, graphitic C3N4 (g-C3N4), a novel metal-free inorganic semiconductor, has attracted much attention in the photocatalysis of water splitting, CO2 reduction, and environmental purification [33]. The band gap of g-C3N4 is about 2.7 eV, meaning that it can absorb visible light up to 460 nm. Furthermore, the CB minimum of g-C3N4 is extremely negative, so photogenerated electrons in the CB of g-C3N4 should have a high reduction ability [33, 34]. As described above, holes in the VB of Ag3PO4 have excellent oxidation abilities; therefore, combining Ag3PO4 with g-C3N4 to construct a Z-scheme photocatalytic system was expected to achieve enhanced photocatalytic performance. Katsumata et al. [35] synthesized a g-C3N4/ Ag3PO4 hybrid photocatalyst using a facile in situ precipitation route, confirming that a small amount of Ag was formed on the g-C3N4/Ag3PO4 surface from the electron-rich structure of g-C3N4 donating electrons to Ag3PO4. The as-prepared g-C3N4/Ag3PO4 containing 25 wt% g-C3N4 exhibited the highest photocatalytic performance for methyl orange (MO) degradation, and its activity and stability were better than that of pure Ag3PO4. The higher photoluminescence (PL) intensity of g-C3N4/Ag3PO4 compared to pure Ag3PO4 was attributed to the higher recombination rate between electrons in the CB of Ag3PO4 and holes in the VB of g-C3N4. Furthermore, superoxide radicals (O2*-) and holes were found to be the main reactive species for g-C3N4/Ag3PO4 in MO degradation. If photogenerated charge carrier transfer in g-C3N4 and Ag3PO4 occurs via a type-Ⅱ heterojunction mechanism, the photogenerated electrons in the CB of g-C3N4 would migrate to the CB of Ag3PO4. Due to the positive ECB (+0.45 V vs. NHE) of Ag3PO4, the electrons in the CB of Ag3PO4 could not reduce O2 to O2*- with a redox potential of -0.046 V, which was not in agreement with the radical capture experiments. The CB potential of g-C3N4 is -1.15 V, and electrons in the CB of g-C3N4 can reduce O2 to O2*-. Therefore, g-C3N4/Ag3PO4 was confirmed as a typical Z-scheme photocatalyst with Ag as the electron mediator, and the photocatalytic mechanism for MO degradation by g-C3N4/Ag3PO4 is shown in Fig. 4(a). Under visible light irradiation, both Ag3PO4 and g-C3N4 are excited, leading to the formation of photogenerated electrons in the CB and holes in the VB. Electrons in the CB of Ag3PO4 shifted into Ag nanoparticles due to the more positive Fermi energy of Ag compared to the CB level of Ag3PO4. Simultaneously, the holes in the VB of g-C3N4 can move to Ag and combine with the electrons from Ag3PO4. However, the highly reducing electrons in the CB of g-C3N4 could react with O2 to form O2*-, which would lead to MO degradation. The holes with strong oxidative abilities in the VB of Ag3PO4 would degrade MO directly (Fig. 4(a)). As previously reported, Ag3PO4 with (111) facets exhibited the best photocatalytic activity due to the (111) facet possessing the highest surface energy [36]. Fan et al. [37] developed a facile solvent evaporation method for the synthesis of g-C3N4/Ag3PO4(111) hybrid photocatalyst, during which metallic Ag was also formed. Under visible light irradiation (λ > 400 nm), the as-obtained g-C3N4/Ag3PO4(111) containing 10 wt% of g-C3N4 exhibited the highest photocatalytic activity in the degradation of methylene blue (MB) and NO gas, and possessed stable photocatalytic ability compared with pure Ag3PO4. The detection of reactive species confirmed that the enhanced photocatalytic activity of g-C3N4/Ag3PO4(111) composite was due to the efficient separation of electron/hole pairs through a Z-scheme system composed of Ag3PO4, Ag, and g-C3N4, in which Ag acted as the electron mediator. In another study, a facile precipitation method was employed to synthesize the Ag3PO4/g-C3N4 Z-scheme photocatalyst, which was used to degrade sulfamethoxazole in water. Under visible light irradiation, the sulfamethoxazole removal efficiency using Ag3PO4/g-C3N4 (m/m = 98/2) was higher than that of pure Ag3PO4 and g-C3N4.In the photodegradation process, in situ generated metallic Ag acted as an electron mediator between Ag3PO4 and g-C3N4 [38].

Fig. 4. (a) The Z-scheme photocatalytic mechanism of g-C3N4/Ag3PO4 for MO degradation under visible light [35]; (b) Photocatalytic mechanism of the g-C3N4/Ag3PO4 composite [39]; (c) Charge separation and transfer in the solar-driven Z-scheme Ag3PO4/Ag/g-C3N4 photocatalytic system [40].

In addition to its application in photodegradation, the Ag3PO4/g-C3N4 Z-scheme system has also been used to convert CO2 to fuels and oxidize H2O to O2. Fan et al. [39] prepared Ag3PO4/g-C3N4 composite using a simple deposition method, and then formed metallic Ag in situ by irradiating the Ag3PO4/g-C3N4 composite with a 500 W Xe lamp. Under simulated sunlight irradiation, the optimal Ag3PO4/g-C3N4 showed a CO2 conversion rate of 57.5 μmol/(h·gcat), which was 6.1 times higher than that of g-C3N4, and found that the main reduction product was CO. The results of CO2 photoreduction and reactive species scavenging confirmed that the transfer of electrons and holes in Ag3PO4/g-C3N4 composite obeyed the Z-scheme photocatalytic mechanism, as shown in Fig. 4(b). Under simulated sunlight, the photogenerated electrons in the CB of Ag3PO4 shift to metallic Ag and then combine with holes from g-C3N4. The leaving electrons in the CB of g-C3N4 can reduce CO2 to fuels. Using an electrostatic assembly and solution-based precipitation method, Yang et al. [40] reported a Z-scheme system of Ag3PO4/g-C3N4 for water photooxidation using AgNO3 as the electron acceptor. The authors demonstrated that the morphology of g-C3N4 in the composite material can influence photoactivity in the O2 evolution reaction. After exposure to white LED light, the evolved O2 efficiency over the optimal Ag3PO4/g-C3N4 composite was higher than that over pure Ag3PO4. Electronic spin resonance (ESR) results indicated that hydroxyl radicals (OH*) were formed in the oxygen evolution process. If the photocatalytic mechanism for oxygen evolution reaction was a type-Ⅱ heterojunction, the photogenerated holes in the VB of Ag3PO4 could migrate to the VB of g-C3N4, meaning that OH* could not be generated. This confirmed that an in situ Z-scheme system was obtained by the generation of metallic Ag nanoparticles, which acted as a recombination center for photogenerated electrons from Ag3PO4 and holes from g-C3N4, maintaining active holes in the VB of Ag3PO4 for water oxidation (Fig. 4(c)). Using a facile in situ precipitation method, g-C3N4/tetrahedral Ag3PO4 hybrid photocatalysts with different mass ratios of g-C3N4 were prepared by Ktsumata et al. [41], in which the g-C3N4 content had a large influence on the photocatalytic performance. The 20 wt% g-C3N4/tetrahedral Ag3PO4 photocatalyst exhibited the highest photocatalytic activity for O2 evolution from water because a Z-scheme system composed of Ag3PO4, Ag, and g-C3N4 was formed.

In addition to g-C3N4, researchers have coupled other photocatalysts with Ag3PO4 to construct Z-scheme photocatalytic systems with enhanced activity and stability. The solubility of AgnX (X =Br, I, S) is lower than that of Ag3PO4, allowing Ag3PO4/AgnX (X =Br, I, S) hybrids to be obtained via an in situ ion-exchange route [42]. Ag3PO4/AgI composite was fabricated using an in situ anion-exchange method by Fang et al. [43] and showed enhanced visible-light-driven photocatalytic performance for MO and phenol degradation compared to pure Ag3PO4 and AgI. XPS and TEM analysis confirmed that Ag nanoparticles formed in the early stage of the photocatalytic process, which could act as the charge transmission bridge between Ag3PO4 and AgI to construct the Z-scheme system, resulting in enhanced activity and stability. Similarly, other Z-scheme photocatalysts, such as AgBr/Ag3PO4 [44] and Ag2S/Ag3PO4[45], have been synthesized via anion-exchange methods with in situ generated metallic Ag acting as the electron mediator in the photocatalytic process. Furthermore, other Ag3PO4-based Z-scheme systems using Ag as the electron mediator, including Ag3PO4/Ag/SiC [46], In2O3/Ag/Ag3PO4 [47], Ag3PO4/Ag/CuBi2O4 [48], SrTiO3/Ag/Ag3PO4 [49], Ag3PO4/Ag/WO2.72 [50], and Ag3PO4/Ag/MoS2[51], have been prepared via liquid phase synthesis (see Table 1). In the Ag3PO4/Ag/WO2.72 Z-scheme system, Ag3PO4 and WO2.72 were used as PS Ⅰ and PS Ⅱ, respectively, due to the VB of WO2.72 being located at a more positive position than that of Ag3PO4 and the CB of Ag3PO4 being located at a more negative position than that of WO2.72.

Recently, a novel plasmonic Z-scheme system was developed due to the response of noble-metal nanoparticles (such as Ag) to visible light through the surface plasmon resonance (SPR) effect [52]. Tang et al. [53] prepared binary Ag3PO4/Ag2MoO4 hybrid materials using a facile solution phase reaction. XRD analysis showed that Ag nanoparticles were formed on the surface of the Ag3PO4/Ag2MoO4 composites in the initial stage of photocatalytic process, leading to the generation of the Ag3PO4/Ag/Ag2MoO4 photocatalyst, which exhibited enhanced photocatalytic activity and photostability toward the remediation of organic dye compared with pure Ag3PO4. This result was due to the plasmonic Z-scheme photocatalytic mechanism, which was confirmed by reactive species trapping experiments and band structure analysis of Ag3PO4 and Ag2MoO4. As shown in Fig. 5, under visible light irradiation, Ag3PO4 can absorb photons to produce photogenerated electrons and holes. The surface plasmonic resonance effect and dipolar character of metallic Ag allows Ag to also absorb visible light, with each absorbed photon inducing the efficient separation of an electron and hole. Plasmon-induced electrons in Ag nanoparticles are transported to the CB of Ag2MoO4 to react with O2, forming O2*-active species, which can degrade organic pollutants. Simultaneously, photogenerated electrons in the CB of Ag3PO4 transfer to the Ag nanoparticles to recombine with holes produced by plasmonic absorption in the Ag nanoparticles, while the photogenerated holes in the VB of Ag3PO4 can directly oxidize the dye molecules.

Fig. 5. Plasmonic Z-scheme photocatalytic mechanism in the Ag3PO4/Ag/Ag2MoO4 photocatalyst under visible light irradiation [53].

In addition to Ag, some nonmetal materials with excellent conductivity can be employed as solid state electron mediators. Recent studies have confirmed that reduced graphene oxide (RGO) can be used as the electron mediator to promote charge transfer between PS Ⅰ and PS Ⅱ in the Z-scheme system [54, 55]. Liu et al. [56] reported a Ag3PO4@RGO@La, Cr:SrTiO3 composite photocatalyst that showed superior anti-photocorrosion and photocatalytic activities in the degradation of both RhB and 2, 4-DNP. Reactive species trapping experiments and ESR results indicated that O2*- and holes played significant roles in the photocatalytic degradation processes. If charge carrier transfer between Ag3PO4 and La, Cr:SrTiO3 occurred via a type-Ⅱ heterojunction mechanism, namely, the photogenerated electrons in the CB of La, Cr:SrTiO3 migrate to the CB of Ag3PO4 with holes in the VB of Ag3PO4 simultaneously transferring to the VB of La, Cr:SrTiO3, then the photogenerated electrons would accumulate in the CB of Ag3PO4 and be unable to reduce O2 into O2*-, which would contradict the above experimental results. Therefore, charge transfer in Ag3PO4@RGO@La, Cr:SrTiO3 composite was shown to obey the Z-scheme photocatalytic mechanism. Under visible light irradiation, photogenerated electrons in the CB of Ag3PO4 could transfer to the donor levels of La, Cr:SrTiO3 via RGO and recombine with photogenerated holes. Meanwhile, the excited electrons in the CB of La, Cr:SrTiO3 with a high reduction ability could react with O2 to produce O2*-, and holes in Ag3PO4with excellent oxidation power could react with H2O to produce OH*, thereby achieving the highly efficient degradation of RhB and 2, 4-DNP. Furthermore, RGO could be used as a sheltering layer to protect Ag3PO4from photocorrosion.

4 Direct Ag3PO4-based Z-scheme photocatalytic systems without an electron mediator

A schematic of a direct Z-scheme photocatalytic system is shown in Fig. 3(b). As discussed above, without an electron mediator, the direct Z-scheme photocatalytic system could also retain a high redox ability. Recent studies on direct Ag3PO4-based Z-scheme photocatalytic systems are summarized in Table 2.

Table 2
Recent studies on direct Ag3PO4-based Z-scheme photocatalytic systems.

As described above, combining Ag3PO4 with g-C3N4 can form Z-scheme photocatalytic systems with Ag as the electron mediator [35-41]. However, direct Ag3PO4/g-C3N4 Z-scheme systems have also been reported. Yi et al. [57] synthesized g-C3N4/Ag3PO4 composite by mixing g-C3N4 and Ag3PO4 in water with stirring, finding that both the C2H4 photo-oxidative activity and stability of Ag3PO4 were enhanced by fabrication of the composite. According to the C2H4 degradation results and band structure analysis of g-C3N4 and Ag3PO4, it was concluded that charge transfer in the g-C3N4/Ag3PO4 composite did not follow a conventional type-Ⅱ heterojunction, and a direct Z-scheme photocatalytic mechanism was suggested. Chen et al. [58] used a facile in situ precipitation method to prepare Ag3PO4/g-C3N4 nanocomposites with different molar ratios of Ag3PO4 to g-C3N4that exhibited enhanced photocatalytic performance for methylene blue degradation compared to pure Ag3PO4 and g-C3N4 under visible light. Furthermore, XPS results showed no metallic Ag on the surface of the fresh and used Ag3PO4/g-C3N4 nanocomposites. The results of electron spin resonance (ESR), the photoluminescence (PL), and reactive species determination confirmed that the migration of photogenerated electrons/holes exhibited a direct Z-scheme mechanism in the Ag3PO4/g-C3N4 nanocomposite.

Other direct Z-scheme composites, such as Ag3PO4/ZnO [59], Ag3PO4/SnS2 [60], Ag3PO4/SnSe2 [61], Ag3PO4/Bi2MoO6 [62], Ag3PO4/MoS2 [63], and Ag3PO4/WO3 [64], have also been synthesized using liquid-phase methods, including precipitation/deposition, hydrothermal treatment, and an organic phase in situ growth strategy.

In a Z-scheme system of Ag3PO4/MoS2 reported previously [51], Ag3PO4 nanoparticles were loaded on the surface of MoS2 nanoslices. Inevitably, metallic Ag could be in situ produced in the initial stage of the photocatalytic process and act as the electron mediator. However, Fan et al. [63] reported the direct Z-scheme system of a Ag3PO4@MoS2 core-shell heterostructure, which was constructed because the MoS2 shell can protect Ag3PO4 from dissolution and photocorrosion during the photocatalytic process. The Ag3PO4@MoS2 photocatalyst showed excellent photocatalytic activity and stability in the photodegradation of RhB and the photocatalytic selective oxidation of benzyl alcohols (BA) to benzaldehyde compared with Ag3PO4. The energy band structure and quenching effects of different scavengers showed that the superior photocatalytic activity of the as-synthesized Ag3PO4@MoS2 composite originated from the direct Z-scheme charge carrier migration mechanism, as shown in Fig. 6(a). Under visible light irradiation, both Ag3PO4 and MoS2 were excited. Subsequently, electrons in the CB of Ag3PO4 could recombine with holes in the VB of MoS2 through the solid/solid contact interface. As a result, abundant electrons on the CB of MoS2 and holes on the VB of Ag3PO4participated in the reduction reaction of dissolved O2and the oxidation of RhB and BA, respectively.

Fig. 6. (a) Schematic illustration of the photocatalytic mechanism of the Ag3PO4@MoS2 core-shell heterostructure under visible light [63]; (b) Proposed mechanism for the direct Z-scheme charge-carrier transfer process in the Ag3PO4/WO3 composite [64].

Notably, in the direct Z-scheme system of Ag3PO4/WO3 composite, WO3 operates as PS Ⅱ rather than Ag3PO4 due to the VB of WO3 lying at a more positive position than that of VB of Ag3PO4. The enhanced photocatalytic performance was mainly attributed to the improved separation of photogenerated charge carriers between Ag3PO4 and WO3 via the direct Z-scheme mechanism (Fig. 6(b)). Under visible light irradiation, Ag3PO4 and WO3 can be excited to produce electrons and holes, simultaneously, electrons in the CB of WO3 transfer to the VB of Ag3PO4 to combine with holes. The holes retained in the VB of WO3 can directly degrade the adsorbed organic dyes or oxidize OH-to OH* radicals, triggering a series of degradation reactions. The electrons left in the CB of Ag3PO4 can be consumed through a multi-electron reaction with oxygen and finally produce OH* radicals, which accelerate the organic dye degradation [64].

5 Conclusions and prospect

Photocatalysis is a promising technology for solving the environmental and energy problems in the future. Traditional photocatalyst TiO2 has a wide band gap that limits its practical application. Silver phosphate (Ag3PO4) is among the most active visible-light-driven photocatalysts reported, with the excellent photocatalytic performance ascribed to its superior electronic structure characteristics. However, photocatalyst stability remains a major problem of Ag3PO4 in both water oxidation and organic decomposition. To meet industrial requirements, much effort has been devoted to further improving the photocatalytic performance and stability of Ag3PO4, including metal deposition, assembly with carbon materials, immobilization on support materials, and combination with other semiconductors to construct type-Ⅱ heterojunctions or Z-scheme systems. In particular, Ag3PO4-based all-solid-state Z-scheme photocatalytic systems could effectively improve the separation/transportation of charge carriers and substantially enhance the photocatalytic activity and stability of Ag3PO4. Although great progress has been made, some remaining problems must be solved to further advance the use of Ag3PO4-based Z-scheme photocatalytic systems.

(1) As shown in Figs. 2(a) and 3(b), when the band gaps of the two semiconductors are staggered, there is much controversy regarding whether the type-Ⅱ heterojunction photocatalytic mechanism or the indirect Z-scheme photocatalytic mechanism occurs. Using Ag3PO4/g-C3N4 composite as an example, some reports have confirmed that the migration of photogenerated electrons and holes in Ag3PO4/g-C3N4 exhibits the direct Z-scheme mechanism [57, 58], while other studies have shown that Ag3PO4/g-C3N4 composite followed a type-Ⅱ heterojunction mechanism [65-67]. Therefore, an in situ detection technique should be developed to clearly distinguish these photocatalytic mechanisms.

(2) Recently, graphene, which has excellent electrical conductivity, has attracted great interest in photocatalysis [68]. Therefore, the graphene could be used as the electron mediator in the Ag3PO4-based Z-scheme photocatalysts to improve photocatalytic activity. Previous reports also showed that the size and morphology of Ag3PO4 can greatly influence its photocatalytic performance [12]. Therefore, the size and morphology of Ag3PO4 should be adjusted to design more efficient Ag3PO4-based Z-scheme photocatalytic systems.

(3) Previous reports of Ag3PO4-based Z-scheme photocatalysts have mainly focused on the photodegradation of organic pollutants in water (Tables 1 and 2), while their application to photocatalytic H2 generation and CO2 reduction require future development. Ag3PO4-based Z-scheme systems have been applied to treat harmful gases (ethylene and nitric oxide), and could, therefore, be extended to degrade other harmful gases, such as formaldehyde and toluene.

(4) Separation and reuse of the photocatalysts in a solution dispersion system must be considered. Combining Ag3PO4 and magnetic semiconductor materials to form Z-scheme photocatalytic systems could address this issue

References
[1] Y. Zheng, Z. M. Pan, X. C. Wang, Chin. J. Catal., 2013, 34: 524–535. DOI:10.1016/S1872-2067(12)60548-8
[2] R. Ahmad, Z. Ahmad, A. U. Khan, N. R. Mastoi, M. Aslam, J. Kim, J. Environ. Chem. Eng., 2016, 4: 4143–4164. DOI:10.1016/j.jece.2016.09.009
[3] J. Schneider, M. Matsuoka, M. Takeuchi, J. L. Zhang, Y. Horiuchi, M. Anpo, D. W. Bahnemann, Chem. Rev., 2014, 114: 9919–9986. DOI:10.1021/cr5001892
[4] Y. Q. Cai, Y. P. Feng, Prog. Surf. Sci., 2016, 91: 183–202. DOI:10.1016/j.progsurf.2016.11.001
[5] L. Chen, J. He, Y. Liu, P. Chen, C. T. Au, S. F. Yin, Chin. J. Catal., 2016, 37: 780–791. DOI:10.1016/S1872-2067(15)61061-0
[6] G. P. Li, Y. X. Wang, L. Q. Mao, RSC Adv., 2014, 4: 53649–53661. DOI:10.1039/C4RA08044K
[7] L. V. Bora, R. K. Mewada, Renew. Sust. Energ. Rev., 2017, 76: 1393–1421. DOI:10.1016/j.rser.2017.01.130
[8] Y. Liu, L. H. Tian, X. Y. Tan, X. Li, X. B. Chen, Sci. Bull., 2017, 62: 431–441. DOI:10.1016/j.scib.2017.01.034
[9] Z. Q. Yi, J. H. Ye, N. Kikugawa, T. Kako, S. X. Ouyang, H. Stu-art-Williams, H. Yang, J. Y. Cao, W. J. Luo, Z. S. Li, Y. Liu, R. L. With-ers, Nat. Mater., 2010, 9: 559–564. DOI:10.1038/nmat2780
[10] X. J. Chen, Y. Z. Dai, X. Y. Wang, J. Alloys Compd., 2015, 649: 910–932. DOI:10.1016/j.jallcom.2015.07.174
[11] X. G. Ma, B. Lu, D. Li, R. Shi, C. S. Pan, Y. F. Zhu, J. Phys. Chem. C, 2011, 115: 4680–4687.
[12] D. J. Martin, G. G. Liu, S. J. A. Moniz, Y. P. Bi, A. M. Beale, J. H. Ye, J. W. Tang, Chem. Soc. Rev., 2015, 44: 7808–7828. DOI:10.1039/C5CS00380F
[13] M. Ge, N. Zhu, Y. P. Zhao, J. Li, L. Liu, Ind. Eng. Chem. Res., 2012, 51: 5167–5173. DOI:10.1021/ie202864n
[14] M. Ge, Chin. J. Catal., 2014, 35: 1410–1417. DOI:10.1016/S1872-2067(14)60079-6
[15] N. Umezawa, S. X. Ouyang, J. H. Ye, Phy. Rev., B, 2011, 83, 035202/1-035202/8.
[16] W. Teng, X. Y. Li, Q. D. Zhao, J. J. Zhao, D. K. Zhang, Appl. Catal. B., 2012, 125: 538–545. DOI:10.1016/j.apcatb.2012.05.043
[17] Y. P. Bi, H. Y. Hu, S. X. Ouyang, Z. B. Jiao, G. X. Lu, J. H. Ye, Chem. Eur. J., 2012, 18: 14272–14275. DOI:10.1002/chem.201201435
[18] Q. Y. Chen, Y. F. Wang, Y. W. Wang, X. C. Zhang, D. H. Duan, C. M. Fan, J. Colloid Interface Sci., 2017, 491: 238–245. DOI:10.1016/j.jcis.2016.12.013
[19] B. Liu, Z. Y. Li, S. Xu, D. D. Han, D. Y. Lu, J. Alloys Compd., 2014, 596: 19–24. DOI:10.1016/j.jallcom.2014.01.179
[20] F. H. Chen, S. S. Li, Q. T. Chen, X. J. Zheng, S. M. Fang, Z. J. Chen, Ma-ter. Lett., 2016, 185: 561–564. DOI:10.1016/j.matlet.2016.09.061
[21] J. F. Ma, J. Zou, L. Y. Li, C. Yao, T. L. Zhang, D. L. Li, Appl. Catal. B., 2013, 134-135: 1–6. DOI:10.1016/j.apcatb.2012.12.032
[22] X. J. Chen, Y. Z. Dai, X. Y. Wang, J. Guo, T. H. Liu, F. F. Li, J. Hazard. Mater., 2015, 292: 9–18. DOI:10.1016/j.jhazmat.2015.01.032
[23] P. Zhou, J. G. Yu, M. Jaroniec, Adv. Mater., 2014, 26: 4920–4935. DOI:10.1002/adma.201400288
[24] M. A. Fox, M. T. Dulay, Chem. Rev., 1993, 93: 341–357. DOI:10.1021/cr00017a016
[25] M. R. Hoffman, S. T. Martin, W. Choi, D. W. Bahnemann, Chem. Rev., 1995. 95, 69-96.
[26] Y. J. Wang, Q. S. Wang, X. Y. Zhan, F. M. Wang, M. Safdar, J. He, Na-noscale, 2013, 5: 8326–8339.
[27] H. J. Li, W. G. Tu, Y. Zhou, Z. G. Zou, Adv. Sci., 2016, 3: 1500389. DOI:10.1002/advs.201500389
[28] Y. Tachibana, L. Vayssieres, J. R. Durrant, Nat Photon., 2012, 6: 511–518. DOI:10.1038/nphoton.2012.175
[29] Y. Umena, K. Kawakami, J. R. Shen, N. Kamiya, Nature, 2011, 473: 55–60. DOI:10.1038/nature09913
[30] A. J. Bard, J. Photochem., 1979, 10: 59–75. DOI:10.1016/0047-2670(79)80037-4
[31] R. Abe, K. Sayama, H. Sugihara, J. Phys. Chem. B, 2005, 109: 16052–16061. DOI:10.1021/jp052848l
[32] K. Maeda, ACS Catal., 2013, 3: 1486–1503. DOI:10.1021/cs4002089
[33] W. J. Ong, L. L. Tan, S. T. Yong, S. P. Chai, Y. H. Ng, Chem. Rev., 2016, 116: 7159–7329. DOI:10.1021/acs.chemrev.6b00075
[34] S. W. Cao, J. X. Low, J. G. Yu, M. Jaroniec, Adv. Mater., 2015, 27: 2150–2176. DOI:10.1002/adma.201500033
[35] H. Katsumata, T. Sakai, T. Suzuki, S. Kaneco, Ind. Eng. Chem. Res., 2014, 53: 8018–8025. DOI:10.1021/ie5012036
[36] D. J. Martin, N. Umezawa, X. W. Chen, J. H. Ye, J. W. Tang, Energ. Environ. Sci., 2013, 6: 3380–3386. DOI:10.1039/c3ee42260g
[37] C. N. Tang, E. Z. Liu, J. Fan, X. Y. Hu, Y. N. Ma, J. Wan, RSC Adv., 2015, 5: 91979–91987. DOI:10.1039/C5RA18096A
[38] L. Zhou, W. Zhang, L. Chen, H. P. Deng, J. Colloid Interface Sci., 2017, 487: 410–417. DOI:10.1016/j.jcis.2016.10.068
[39] Y. M. He, L. H. Zhang, B. T. Teng, M. H. Fan, Environ. Sci. Technol., 2015, 49: 649–656. DOI:10.1021/es5046309
[40] X. F. Yang, Z. P. Chen, J. S. Xu, H. Tang, K. M. Chen, Y. Jiang, ACS Appl. Mater. Interf, 2015, 7: 15285–15293. DOI:10.1021/acsami.5b02649
[41] I. Tateishi, H. Katsumata, T. Suzuki, S. Kaneco, Mater. Lett., 2017, 201: 66–69. DOI:10.1016/j.matlet.2017.04.138
[42] Y. P. Bi, S. X. Ouyang, J. Y. Cao, J. H. Ye, Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys., 2011, 13: 10071–10075. DOI:10.1039/c1cp20488b
[43] Z. H. Chen, W. L. Wang, Z. G. Zhang, X. M. Fang, J. Phys. Chem. C, 2013, 117: 19346–19352. DOI:10.1021/jp406508y
[44] H. Katsumata, T. Hayashi, M. Taniguchi, T. Suzuki, S. Kaneco, Ma-ter. Sci. Semicon. Process., 2014, 25: 68–75. DOI:10.1016/j.mssp.2014.01.033
[45] J. Tian, T. J. Yan, Z. Qiao, L. L. Wang, W. J. Li, J. M. You, B. B. Huang, Appl. Catal. B., 2017, 209: 566–578. DOI:10.1016/j.apcatb.2017.03.022
[46] Z. H. Chen, F. Bing, Q. Liu, Z. G. Zhang, X. M. Fang, J. Mater. Chem. A, 2015, 3: 4652–4658. DOI:10.1039/C4TA06530A
[47] X. X. Chen, R. Li, X. Y. Pan, X. T. Huang, Z. G. Yi, Chem. Eng. J., 2017, 320: 644–652. DOI:10.1016/j.cej.2017.03.072
[48] W. L. Shi, F. Guo, S. L. Yuan, Appl. Catal. B., 2017, 209: 720–728. DOI:10.1016/j.apcatb.2017.03.048
[49] C. X. Zhang, K. Yu, Y. J. Feng, Y. Chang, T. Yang, Y. Xuan, D. Lei, L. L. Lou, S. X. Liu, Appl. Catal. B., 2017, 210: 77–87. DOI:10.1016/j.apcatb.2017.03.058
[50] Y. Y. Bu, Z. Y. Chen, C. J. Sun, Appl. Catal. B., 2015, 179: 363–371. DOI:10.1016/j.apcatb.2015.05.045
[51] C. S. Zhu, L. Zhang, B. Jiang, J. T. Zheng, P. Hu, S. J. Li, M. B. Wu, W. T. Wu, Appl. Surf. Sci., 2016, 377: 99–108. DOI:10.1016/j.apsusc.2016.03.143
[52] X. F. Wang, S. F. Li, Y. Q. Ma, H. G. Yu, J. G. Yu, J. Phys. Chem. C, 2011, 115: 14648–14655.
[53] H. Tang, Y. H. Fu, S. F. Chang, S. Y. Xie, G. G. Tang, Chin. J. Catal., 2017, 38: 337–347. DOI:10.1016/S1872-2067(16)62570-6
[54] P. Li, Y. Zhou, H. J. Li, Q. F. Xu, X. G. Meng, X. Y. Wang, M. Xiao, Z. G. Zou, Chem Commun, 2015, 51: 800–803. DOI:10.1039/C4CC08744E
[55] A. Iwase, Y. H. Ng, Y. Ishiguro, A. Kudo, R. Amal, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2011, 133: 11054–11057. DOI:10.1021/ja203296z
[56] T. Cai, Y. T. Liu, L. L. Wang, S. Q. Zhang, Y. X. Zeng, J. L. Yuan, J. H. Ma, W. Y. Dong, C. B. Liu, S. L. Luo, Appl. Catal. B., 2017, 208: 1–13. DOI:10.1016/j.apcatb.2017.02.065
[57] X. X. Chen, X. T. Huang, Z. G. Yi, Chem. Eur. J., 2014, 20: 17590–17596. DOI:10.1002/chem.201404284
[58] S. G. Meng, X. F. Ning, T. Zhang, S. F. Chen, X. L. Fu, Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys., 2015, 17: 11577–11585. DOI:10.1039/C5CP01523E
[59] Q. S. Li, C. Yang, Mater. Lett., 2017, 199: 168–171. DOI:10.1016/j.matlet.2017.04.058
[60] J. Luo, X. S. Zhou, L. Ma, L. M. Xu, X. Y. Xu, Z. H. Du, J. Q. Zhang, Ma-ter. Res. Bull., 2016, 81: 16–26. DOI:10.1016/j.materresbull.2016.04.028
[61] P. F. Tan, X. Chen, L. D. Wu, Y. Y. Shang, W. W. Liu, J. Pan, X. Xiong, Appl. Catal. B., 2017, 202: 326–334. DOI:10.1016/j.apcatb.2016.09.033
[62] Z. L. Wang, K. Dai, L. H. Lu, C. H. Liang, L. Geng, Mater. Lett., 2016, 169: 250–253. DOI:10.1016/j.matlet.2016.01.147
[63] J. Wan, X. Du, E. Z. Liu, Y. Hu, J. Fan, X. Y. Hu, J. Catal., 2017, 345: 281–294. DOI:10.1016/j.jcat.2016.11.013
[64] J. S. Lu, Y. J. Wang, F. Liu, L. Zhang, S. N. Chai, Appl. Surf. Sci., 2017, 393: 180–190. DOI:10.1016/j.apsusc.2016.10.003
[65] D. L. Jiang, J. J. Zhu, M. Chen, J. M. Xie, J. Coll. Interf. Sci., 2014, 417: 115–120. DOI:10.1016/j.jcis.2013.11.042
[66] F. J. Zhang, F. Z. Xie, S. F. Zhu, J. Liu, J. Zhang, S. F. Mei, W. Zhao, Chem. Eng. J., 2013, 228: 435–441. DOI:10.1016/j.cej.2013.05.027
[67] Z. L. Xiu, H. Bo, Y. Z. Wu, X. P. Hao, Appl. Surf. Sci., 2014, 289: 394–399. DOI:10.1016/j.apsusc.2013.10.175
[68] C. Han, N. Zhang, Y. J. Xu, Nano Today, 2016, 11: 351–372. DOI:10.1016/j.nantod.2016.05.008