催化学报  2017, Vol. 38 Issue (11): 1860-1869   PDF    
扩展功能
加入收藏夹
复制引文信息
加入引用管理器
Email Alert
RSS
本文作者相关文章
Yunhui Liao
Feng Li
Xin Dai
Ning Zhao
Fukui Xiao
Solid base catalysts derived from Ca-M-Al (M=Mg, La, Ce, Y) layered double hydroxides for dimethyl carbonate synthesis by transesterification of methanol with propylene carbonate
Yunhui Liaoa,b, Feng Lia, Xin Daia,b, Ning Zhaoa,c, Fukui Xiaoa,c     
a. State Key Laboratory of Coal Conversion, Institute of Coal Chemistry, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Taiyuan 030001, Shanxi, China;
b. University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, Shanxi, China;
c. National Engineering Research Center for Coal-Based Synthesis, Taiyuan 030001, Shanxi, China
* Corresponding author. Feng Li, Tel: +86-351-4049612; Fax: +86-351-4046129; E-mail: lifeng2729@sxicc.ac.cn; Fukui Xiao, Tel: +86-351-4041153; Fax: +86-351-4046129; E-mail: xiaofk@sxicc.ac.cn
Foundation item: This work was supported by the Natural Science Foundation of Shanxi Province (201601D102006) and the Key Science and Technology Program of Shanxi Province, China (MD2014-09, MD2014-10)
Abstract: Composite solid base catalysts derived from Ca-M-Al (M=Mg, La, Ce, Y) layered double hydroxides (LDH) were synthesized, characterized and applied to the transesterification of methanol with pro-pylene carbonate. X-ray diffraction analyses of the catalysts show that all of the catalysts were in the form of composite oxides. Compared with the Ca-Al LDH catalyst, the specific surface areas and pore volumes of the catalysts were increased with the introduction of Mg, La or Ce. The catalytic perfor-mance of these catalysts increases in the order of Ca-Y-Al < Ca-Al < Ca-Ce-Al < Ca-La-Al < Ca-Mg-Al, which is consistent with the total surface basic amounts of these materials and the formation of especially strong basic sites following modification with Mg and La. The Ca-Mg-Al catalyst shows the highest (Ca+Mg):Al atomic ratio, indicating that it likely contains more unsaturated O2- ions, providing it with the highest concentration of very strong basic sites. The recyclability of these cat-alysts is improved following the addition of Mg, La, Ce or Y, with the Ca-Mg-Al maintaining a high level of activity after ten recycling trials. X-ray diffraction analyses of fresh and used Ca-Mg-Al demonstrate that this catalyst is exceptionally stable, which could be of value in practical applica-tions related to heterogeneous catalysis.
© 2017, Dalian Institute of Chemical Physics, Chinese Academy of Sciences.
Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
Key words: Ca-M-Al layered double hydroxide     Solid base     Transesterification     Dimethyl carbonate    
以Ca-M-Al(M=Mg, La, Ce, Y)层状双氢氧化物为前驱体的固体碱用于酯交换合成碳酸二甲酯
廖云辉a,b, 李枫a, 代鑫a,b, 赵宁a,c, 肖褔魁a,c     
a. 中国科学院山西煤炭化学研究所煤转化国家重点实验室, 山西太原 030001;
b. 中国科学院大学, 北京 100049;
c. 国家煤基合成工程技术研究中心, 山西太原 030001
摘要:碳酸二甲酯(DMC)是一种环境友好型绿色化学品,可作为甲基化和羰基化试剂用于取代传统剧毒的硫酸二甲酯和光气.另外,DMC具有良好的溶解性能,可用于高级溶剂;DMC分子中具有高的氧含量,可用作汽油添加剂来提高汽油的辛烷值;DMC还可用作聚碳酸酯的原料.随着人们环保意识的不断增强,DMC的生产和应用呈现出巨大的吸引力和市场潜力.DMC合成方法主要有光气法、甲醇氧化羰化法、尿素醇解法及酯交换法等.酯交换法具有反应条件温和、产率高等优点,是目前工业制备DMC的主要方法.研究发现,相对于酸性催化剂,碱性催化剂更有利于酯交换法合成DMC.金属氧化物催化剂具有活性高、热稳定性高及可连续重复回收利用等优点,因而引起了广泛关注.CaO对于酯交换合成DMC反应具有良好的催化活性,但其稳定性差.因此,通常采用复合金属氧化物来促进CaO的分散,并增加金属间相互作用以防止CaO流失.研究发现,经煅烧后的Mg-Al,Ca-Al和Ca-Mg-Al催化剂对于酯交换反应具有高的活性和稳定性.此外,通过碱性稀土金属(La,Ce和Y)的引入可以修饰催化剂上的碱性位点,从而调变催化剂的碱性. 本文合成了一系列以Ca-M-Al(M=Mg,La,Ce,Y)层状双氢氧化物为前驱体的固体碱催化剂,将其用于甲醇与碳酸丙烯酯酯交换合成DMC.通过X射线衍射、热重分析、红外光谱、X射线光电子能谱、电感耦合等离子体、CO2程序升温脱附和Hammett指示剂对催化剂进行了表征.研究发现,各催化剂的活性高低依次为:Ca-Y-Al < Ca-Al < Ca-Ce-Al < Ca-La-Al < Ca-Mg-Al,这与催化剂表面总碱量相一致.通过Mg和La的引入,催化剂表面出现了超强碱性位.其中,Ca-Mg-Al催化剂表面具有最高的(Ca+Mg):Al原子比,从而导致催化剂表面产生更多的不饱和O2-离子,因而具有最高的碱性位数量.此外,通过Mg,La,Ce和Y的引入,催化剂的重复使用性能得到了提高.特别是Ca-Mg-Al催化剂,在10次循环后仍保持着高的活性,且其结构没有发生显著变化,表明其稳定性较高,因此该催化剂在非均相催化中具有高的应用价值.
关键词Ca-M-Al层状双氢氧化物    固体碱    酯交换反应    碳酸二甲酯    

1 Introduction

As the result of increasing interest in environmental protection, and because of associated governmental regulations, so-called green chemistry syntheses have received significant attention. Dimethyl carbonate (DMC) is a commonly used and environmentally benign building block in fine chemistry due to its useful chemical properties and low toxicity [1], and can be employed as a methylation or carbonylation reagent in place of the more hazardous substances phosgene and dimethyl sulfate [2]. DMC can also serve as an effective gasoline additive because of its high octane value [3], and is used as a monomer for the synthesis of polycarbonate resins [4].

Various methods has been developed for the synthesis of DMC, including the oxidative carbonylation of methanol [5, 6], the transesterification of methanol with cyclic carbonates [7-10], the alcoholysis of urea [11-13] and direct synthesis from carbon dioxide and methanol [14-16]. Among these, the transesterification of methanol with propylene carbonate (PC) is a promising route with the advantages of minimal potential for equipment corrosion, a high degree of safety and good yields [17, 18]. It has been determined that basic catalysts are effective for this reaction [19], and metal oxides are of particular interest due to their various advantages, such as high activity and ease of recycling during continuous processing [10, 20-23]. Calcium oxide exhibits good catalytic activity but poor stability [9, 24], and so the use of multi-metal composite oxides that facilitate the dispersion of CaO and increase the interactions of metals to prevent leaching has been proposed [9].

Layered double hydroxides (LDHs) have the general formula [M2+1-xM3+x(OH)2]x+[(An-)x/n]x-·mH2O, where M2+ and M3+ represent divalent and trivalent metals and An- is an exchangeable interlayer anion [25]. Following the calcination of these materials, metal oxides with homogeneously dispersed M2+ and M3+ ions and adjustable acid-base properties are obtained [26]. Over the past several years, LDHs have been used in a wide array of practical applications in heterogeneous catalysis [26, 27], adsorption [28], pharmaceuticals [29], photochemistry and electrochemistry [25, 30]. Recently, studies have demonstrated that calcined Mg-Al, Ca-Al and Ca-Mg-Al LDHs are effective and stable transesterification catalysts [3134]. Moreover, the introduction of basic rare earth elements (La, Ce or Y) into these materials can modify the basic sites and thus modulate the basicity of the catalyst [35].

In the present work, the basic metals Mg, La, Ce and Y were inserted into Ca-Al LDHs and the corresponding mixed oxides were obtained by calcination. The catalytic activities of these new materials were subsequently assessed during the transesterification of methanol with PC. The effects of these metals on the physicochemical properties of the as-prepared mixed oxides were also investigated using X-ray diffraction (XRD), thermogravimetry-differential thermogravimetry (TG-DTG), infrared (IR) spectroscopy, X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS), inductively coupled plasma-optical emission spectroscopy (ICP-OES), Brunauer-Emmett-Teller (BET) surface area analyses, and CO2-temperature programmed desorption (TPD) and Hammett titration data. In this manner, a more comprehensive relationship between the catalytic activities of these materials and their physicochemical properties was developed.

2 Experimental
2.1 Catalyst preparation

Ca-M-Al (M = Mg, La, Ce or Y) LDHs were synthesized using a co-precipitation method. Typically, the appropriate amounts of metal chlorides (employing a (Ca+M)/Al molar ratio of 2 and a Ca/M molar ratio of 3) were dissolved in 100 mL distilled water to produce solution A. The required quantity of NaOH was also dissolved in 100 mL distilled water to give solution B. Subsequently, the two solutions were added dropwise by peristaltic pump to 250 mL of a water/ethanol solution having a water/ethanol volume ratio of 2:3, with vigorous stirring at 333 K under N2 while maintaining the pH at 10, followed by stirring under the same conditions for 24 h. The precipitate was removed by filtration and washed with deionized water until the wash water showed a pH of 7, then dried under vacuum at 353 K and calcined at 1073 K under N2 for 6 h. The precursors and calcined catalysts are designated herein as M-CAP and M-CA, respectively.

A pure Ca-Al LDH (with a Ca/Al molar ratio of 2) was synthesized using the same method described above, and the precursor and calcined catalyst are designated as CAP and CA, respectively. A mixture of CaO and Al2O3 was also prepared by mechanical mixing with a Ca/Al molar ratio of 2 and is designated as CA-mixing.

2.2 Characterization of catalysts

XRD data were acquired with a D8 Advance (Bruker, Germany) diffractometer, using Cu Kα (1.5406 Å) radiation at 40 kV and 50 mA. The scan rate was 3°/min in the 2θ range of 5°–80°. TG-DTG analyses were performed using a Rigaku TG 8120 instrument, heating each sample at 10 K/min from room temperature to 1173 K under N2. Fourier transform IR (FT-IR) spectra were acquired with a Nicolet Nexus 470 FT-IR spectrophotometer over the range of 4000-400 cm-1, summing 64 scans for each spectrum and with a resolution of 2 cm-1. XPS data were acquired using an AXIS ULTRA DLD spectrometer with monochromatic Al Kα (1486.8 eV) radiation under ultrahigh vacuum. The binding energy (BE) values were calibrated internally using the C 1s peak with BE = 284.8 eV. The experimental error was within ±0.1 eV. Elemental chemical analysis was performed using ICP-OES with a Thermo iCAP 6300 instrument.

The BET specific surface areas and pore volumes of these materials were determined with a Micromeritics Tristar II 3020. CO2-TPD data were acquired using a Builder PCA-1200 chemical adsorption instrument. Each sample was pretreated in a He flow at 1073 K for 1 h and then cooled to room temperature. CO2 was adsorbed at room temperature for 30 min at 40 mL/min, after which a He flow was initiated to purge residual CO2 for 30 min. The desorption was performed at a heating rate of 10 K/min from 323 to 1173 K, using a thermal conductivity detector and He as the carrier gas.

Hammett indicators were employed to determine the basicity and base strength of each catalyst. Pre-treated catalyst specimens were dispersed in cyclohexane and titrated with a solution of benzoic acid in cyclohexane in the presence of Hammett indicators to determine the total basicity. The base strength (H_) of each material was determined from the color change of various pH indicators after 12 h, using phenolphthalein (H_ = 9.3), 2, 4-dinitroaniline (H_ = 15.0), 4-nitroaniline (H_ = 18.4), 4-chloroaniline (H_ = 26.5) and diphenylmethane (H_ = 35.0).

2.3 Catalytic tests

All catalysts were activated at 1073 K under N2 for 1 h prior to catalytic trials in a glass batch reactor equipped with a spiral condenser at 333 K. Following each reaction, the product was centrifuged, filtered and analyzed with a gas chromatograph equipped with a flame ionization detector. A stoichiometric excess of methanol was used during these reactions, and the PC conversion, DMC selectivity and DMC yield were calculated by the following equations.

(1)
(2)
(3)

Here, mPC1 is the mass of PC in the feed, mPC2 is the mass of PC in the product, mDMC is the mass of DMC generated, MPC is the molar mass of PC, and MDMC is the molar mass of DMC.

3 Results and discussion
3.1 XRD analysis

The XRD patterns of the CAP and M-CAP samples are shown in Fig. 1(a). It is evident that all samples had a typical layer structure and generated three sharp, symmetric characteristic peaks that can be assigned to the reflections of the (002), (004) and (020) planes. The peak intensities of the samples are different due to variations in the valances and dimensions of the ions. The Mg-CAP shows excellent crystallinity compared with the CAP sample, suggesting that Mg2+ favors the formation of the LDH structure. However, the peak intensities of the other M-CAP samples are lower than those of the CAP, demonstrating comparatively poor crystallinity.

Fig. 1. The XRD patterns of CAP and M-CAP (a) and CA and M-CA (b) samples.

Following calcination, all samples were in the form of composite oxides (Fig. 1(b)). A mayenite (Ca12Al14O33) phase is observed in the pattern of each sample, indicating an interaction between Ca and Al. In the case of the Mg-CA, the intensity of the CaO peak is much higher than those of the other metal-modified samples. Moreover, the chemical interaction between Mg and Al evidently generated a new MgAl2O4 phase. It is also apparent that La interacted with Ca and Al to form a CaLaAlO4 phase, while Y only interacted with Al to form an Al5Y3O12 phase. Interestingly, the Ce-CA sample demonstrates a CeO2 phase with a weak Ca12Al14O33 peak, possibly because the introduction of Ce leads to a disordered structure.

3.2 TG analysis

The TGA-DTG data acquired from the CAP and M-CAP samples are depicted in Fig. 2, and indicate the typical thermal decomposition stages of LDH structures [36]. In the case of the CAP sample, three major mass losses are observed [36]. The first occurs over the range of 300-426 K and corresponds to the removal of physically absorbed and interlayer water. The second mass loss in the range of 548-583 K can be attributed to the de-hydroxylation of the inorganic layers, leading to collapse of the layered structure, while the final mass loss at 871-983 K can be ascribed to the decomposition of the subject-object structure. However, it is clear that the M-CAP samples behave differently. The decomposition of these materials occurs at lower temperatures, especially that of the Ce-CAP, suggesting that the insertion of metal ions may distort the main structure and decrease the thermal stability of Ca-Al LDHs.

Fig. 2. TGA-DTG profiles of the CAP and M-CAP samples.
3.3 IR analysis

FT-IR spectroscopy was employed to study the structural features of CAP and CA samples (Fig. 3). The O-H stretching vibration of free water at 3644 cm-1 can be observed [12] in these spectra, and the stretching mode of hydroxyl groups in layer and interlayer water molecules appears as a broad band at approximately 3455 cm-1 [37]. The band at 1621 cm-1 is due to the bending vibration of physically absorbed water [38]. The band at 1400 cm-1 demonstrates the presence of mono and bidentate carbonates, even though carbonates were not detected by XRD, confirming that the catalyst surfaces were subjected to a high degree of carbonation [39, 40]. In addition, bands attributed to metal-OH bonds are also evident at 782, 526 and 427 cm-1.

Fig. 3. FT-IR spectra of CAP and M-CAP (a) and CA and M-CA (b) samples.

After calcination at 1073 K, all samples show considerable changes. A broad but less intense band appears at 3460 cm-1 and can be assigned to the stretching mode of hydroxyl groups. Weak bands originating from surface carbonate or hydrogen carbonate species are also present as a result of the adsorption of atmospheric CO2 on the external surfaces of the catalysts during handling. The band at 1410 cm-1 can be ascribed to the O−C−O stretching vibrations of adsorbed carbonate anions on the surface basic sites of the catalysts. The intensity of this peak in the Mg-CA and La-CA spectra is higher than in the case of the pure CA sample, suggesting a greater carbonate content on the surfaces of the former materials than on the pure CA, because of higher surface basicity. Therefore, introducing the appropriate amounts of Mg or La may increase the surface basicity of these materials [41]. In the low wavenumber region (400-1000 cm-1), the bands related to metal−OH bonds shift to higher wavenumbers. It is also apparent that the spectra are dominated by a strong band at 852 cm-1 (attributed to metal−oxygen bonds) that is absent in the patterns obtained from the CAP and M-CAP samples, suggesting that metal oxides are formed during calcination. Variations in the shapes and intensities of these bands between specimens may originate from the formation of different oxide species.

3.4 XPS and ICP analyses

The surface properties and compositions of the CA and M-CA catalysts were assessed by XPS, and the data in Table 1 show that the Ca and Al BE values are very similar for all samples. Fig. 4 provides the XPS spectra of the CA and M-CA catalysts. The Mg-CA Mg 2p spectrum contains a single peak at 50.0 eV that is consistent with the presence of Mg2+ [42]. In addition, the La 3d5/2 core-level peak is located at a BE of 834.8 eV, a value that is higher than those reported for La2O3 (834.3 eV) [43] or LaAlO3 (833.8 eV) [44]. This peak can therefore be assigned to well-dispersed La species [45]. In the Ce 3d spectrum, the three main Ce 3d5/2 features at 882.1, 888.1 and 897.8 eV and the three main Ce 3d3/2 features at 900.3, 907.0 and 916.2 eV can be ascribed to Ce4+ in CeO2 [46], which is consistent with the XRD results. Two other peaks, at 883.6 and 901.3 eV, are also evident and are attributed to Ce3+. In the case of the Y-CA catalyst, four peaks are present at 156.4, 157.7, 158.4 and 160.1 eV, corresponding to Y 3d5/2 and Y 3d3/2 electrons [47, 48]. Compared with the peaks generated by pure Y2O3 at approximately 156.8 and 158.9 eV [49], the higher Y 3d BE values (157.7 and 160.1 eV) suggest that the Y atoms have combined with atmospheric moisture to produce Y−OH or Y−OC sites [48]. The O 1s spectra of the CA and M-CA catalysts contain three intense peaks at 530, 531 and 532 eV, ascribed to lattice O2-, surface hydroxyl groups and carbonate groups, respectively [50, 51]. It can be seen that the O 1s BEs of the catalysts modified with Mg, La or Ce are shifted to lower values (Table 1), and so the electron pair donating ability of the surface oxygen atoms may be enhanced [52, 53].

Fig. 4. XPS spectra of CA and M-CA catalysts.
Table 1
The binding energy values of the CA and M-CA catalysts.

The textural parameters and metal compositions of the catalysts are summarized in Table 2. Compared with the CA catalyst, the specific surface areas and pore volumes of the catalysts were increased with the introduction of Mg, La or Ce. In addition, the surface concentrations of the metals and of Ca are noticeably higher, suggesting that the catalyst surfaces were enriched in these elements. Notably, the Mg-CA and La-CA catalysts exhibit lower Al levels compared with the other catalysts.

Table 2
The textural parameters and metal compositions of the CA and M-CA catalysts.
3.5 Basicity analyses

The basicity of each catalyst was determined using CO2-TPD and Hammett indicators. The CO2-TPD profiles of the CA and M-CA catalysts are shown in Fig. 5. For all catalysts, the broad peak ranging from 300 to 700 K can be divided into two peaks (peak α and peak β), attributed to weak and moderate basic sites that primarily result from basic OH- groups and Mx+-O2- pairs. Another broad peak (peak γ) between 700 and 900 K can be ascribed to strongly basic sites associated with unsaturated O2- anions. The CA catalyst shows a symmetric desorption peak at 800 K, whereas the M-CA generates more complex data in which more than two Gaussian peaks are present, suggesting that the addition of metal ions has a significant effect on the strongly basic surface sites. Prior studies have demonstrated that the peaks above 900 K can be assigned to super strong basic sites [54]. The CO2-TPD profiles confirm that super strong basic site (peak δ) were present on the Mg-CA and La-CA catalysts. Therefore, the introduction of Mg and La evidently generates a certain number of super strong basic sites, possibly due to the rearrangement of isolated O2- ions on the catalyst surfaces. Wu et al. [55] reported that the Mx+-O2- pairs on the catalyst surface could partially split to generate unsaturated O2- ions. The Mg-CA catalyst was found to have the highest (Mg+Ca):Al atomic ratio among the catalysts (Table 2), which may be responsible for the presence of more unsaturated O2- ions, leading to the highest concentration of super strong basic sites.

Fig. 5. CO2-TPD profiles of the CA and M-CA catalysts.

The base strength (H_) of each catalyst was subsequently assessed using Hammett indicators. The basicity distributions of the catalysts are summarized in Table 3. According to the results of titrations, three basic sites were identified: weak (9.3-15.0), medium (15.0-18.4) and strong (18.4-26.5). Noticeably, values in the super strong basic strength range (26.5-35.0) were found with the introduction of Mg and La, which is consistent with the CO2-TPD results.

Table 3
The basicity distributions and basic amounts of the CA and M-CA catalysts.

The total basic amounts determined from the Hammett indicators were relatively high compared with those obtained from CO2-TPD, because CO2-TPD primarily responds to surface basic sites, while titrations with Hammett indicators can detect both exposed and internal basic sites. The total amounts of basic sites determined by both methods were in the same order of Y-CA < CA < Ce-CA < La-CA < Mg-CA.

3.6 Catalytic performance

The effects of the methanol/PC molar ratio and catalyst mass on DMC yields were investigated (Fig. 6). The data demonstrate that the yield increases along with the methanol/PC molar ratio within a certain range and then falls somewhat at a ratio of 15 because the PC concentration becomes too low for the transesterification to proceed efficiently [56]. In contrast, the yield only exhibits a slight increased up to a catalyst mass of 2 wt% with minimal changes above that level, suggesting that reaction equilibrium has been reached [57]. Therefore, the optimum reaction conditions consist of a methanol/PC molar ratio of 12 and a catalyst mass of 2 wt%. The catalytic activity increases in the order of Y-CA < CA < Ce-CA < La-CA < Mg-CA, and the highest PC conversion of 55.3% and DMC selectivity of 96.3% were obtained over the Mg-CA catalyst (Table 4).

Fig. 6. Catalytic performance of the CA (a) and M-CA (b) catalysts.
Table 4
Catalytic performances and basicity values of the CA and M-CA catalysts.

During the reaction, the role of the basic sites is to activate CH3OH to form CH3O-, which then attacks PC to produce DMC. Many studies [10, 58, 59] have reported that catalysts having the highest basic amounts will exhibit the best catalytic performance, and that high basic strength is also responsible for promoting the reaction [59]. In this study, the introduction of Mg, La or Ce increased the total surface basic amount of the catalysts. This is also reflected by increases in the DMC yields. The activity of the catalysts increases in the order of Y-CA < CA < Ce-CA < La-CA < Mg-CA, which is in good agreement with the basicity of the catalysts as calculated using the CO2-TPD results. Thus, the relationship between the surface basicity and DMC yield was investigated. Fig. 7 demonstrates that the total surface basic amount and density of the as-prepared catalyst both have a linear relationship with the DMC yield.

Fig. 7. The relationship between the DMC yield and the total surface basic amount (a) and basic density (b). Reaction conditions: methanol/PC molar ratio = 12, catalyst mass = 2 wt% of total reactants, 333 K, 2 h.
3.7 Recyclability tests

Fig. 8 presents the results of recyclability trials using the catalysts. Although the initial activity of the CA-mixing catalyst is the highest, the activity deceases drastically after the tenth recycling. This effect may have resulted from the weak interaction between Ca and Al in the CA-mixing sample. In the case of the CA catalyst, the DMC yield decreases by 12.6% after 10 recycling runs, suggesting that the recyclability of this materials has been improved owing to the increased interaction between Ca and Al. Following modification with metal ions, the M-CA catalysts exhibit a longer recycle life compared with the CA-mixing and CA catalysts, such that the catalytic performance of the former is higher than those of the latter after five recycling runs. Finally, the recyclability of the catalysts after 10 recycling runs increases in the order of CA-mixing < CA < Ce-CA < Y-CA < La-CA < Mg-CA. This excellent recyclability may be ascribed to the intermetallic interactions induced by the addition of metals, which stabilize the active species of the catalysts.

Fig. 8. Results of recyclability trials using the CA-mixing, CA and M-CA catalysts. Reaction conditions: methanol/PC molar ratio = 12, catalyst mass = 2 wt% of total reactants, 333 K, 2 h.

The XRD patterns of the fresh and ten times recycled Mg-CA catalyst are provided in Fig. 9. It is evident that there is no difference in the patterns after ten recycling trials, suggesting significant stability. The chemical compositions of the fresh and recycled samples are also summarized in Table 5. The decrease in the catalytic performance after 10 recycling runs can be ascribed to a slight loss of active Ca and Mg ions.

Fig. 9. XRD patterns of fresh (1) and used (2) Mg-CA catalyst samples.
Table 5
Catalytic performances and metal compositions of fresh and used Mg-CA catalyst samples.
4 Conclusions

LDHs containing various alkaline earth or rare earth metals Ca-M-Al (M = Mg, La, Ce, Y) were prepared and applied to a transesterification reaction after calcination. XRD analysis results indicate that Ca-M-Al LDHs were successfully synthesized and subsequently decomposed to give the corresponding metal oxides during calcination. The surfaces of these catalysts were rich in Mg, La, Ce or Y as well as in Ca, as demonstrated by XPS data. The results from basicity analyses by CO2-TPD and Hammett titrations show that the basicity of the catalysts is increased following modification with Mg, La or Ce. The total surface basic amount and density both exhibited a linear correlation with the DMC yield. Furthermore, the recyclability of the M-CA catalysts was improved, such that a Ca-Mg-Al specimen maintained the highest activity after 10 recycling trials, with no appreciable variations in its XRD pattern with repeated use. The work reported herein is expected to lead to the development of high-efficiency solid base catalysts for the transesterification of PC with methanol. Such catalysts offer a simple, ecologically safe, cost effective and energy efficient means of synthesizing DMC while also allowing facile recycling.

References
[1] Y. Ono, Appl. Catal. A, 1997, 155: 133–166. DOI:10.1016/S0926-860X(96)00402-4
[2] D. F. Wang, X. L. Zhang, J. Ma, H. W. Yu, J. Z. Shen, W. Wei, Catal. Sci. Technol., 2016, 6: 1530–1545. DOI:10.1039/C5CY01712B
[3] D. D. Wu, Z. Chen, Ind. Eng. Chem. Res., 2009, 48: 6287–6290. DOI:10.1021/ie801852e
[4] S. Y. Huang, B. Yan, S. P. Wang, X. B. Ma, Chem. Soc. Rev., 2015, 44: 3079–3116. DOI:10.1039/C4CS00374H
[5] G. Merza, B. László, A. Oszkó, G. Pótári, E. Varga, A. Erdőhelyi, Catal. Lett., 2014, 145: 881–892.
[6] R. G. Zhang, J. R. Li, B. J. Wang, RSC Adv., 2013, 3: 12287–12298. DOI:10.1039/c3ra40256h
[7] J. Q. Wang, J. Sun, W. G. Cheng, C. Y. Shi, K. Dong, X. P. Zhang, S. J. Zhang, Catal. Sci. Technol., 2012, 2: 600–605. DOI:10.1039/C1CY00342A
[8] A. Pyrlik, W. F. Hoelderich, K. Müller, W. Arlt, J. Strautmann, D. Kruse, Appl. Catal. B, 2012, 125: 486–491. DOI:10.1016/j.apcatb.2011.09.033
[9] H. Wang, M. H. Wang, S. G. Liu, N. Zhao, W. Wei, Y. H. Sun, J. Mol. Catal. A, 2006, 258: 308–312. DOI:10.1016/j.molcata.2006.05.050
[10] P. Kumar, V. C. Srivastava, I. M. Mishra, Energy Fuels, 2015, 29: 2664–2675. DOI:10.1021/ef502856z
[11] C. C. Wu, X. Q. Zhao, Y. J. Wang, Catal. Commun., 2005, 6: 694–698. DOI:10.1016/j.catcom.2005.06.010
[12] X. M. Wu, M. Kang, N. Zhao, W. Wei, Y. H. Sun, Catal. Commun., 2014, 46: 46–50. DOI:10.1016/j.catcom.2013.10.040
[13] C. Zhang, B. Lu, X. G. Wang, J. X. Zhao, Q. H. Cai, Catal. Sci. Technol., 2012, 2: 305–309. DOI:10.1039/C1CY00216C
[14] J. Bian, M. Xiao, S. J. Wang, X. J. Wang, Y. X. Lu, Y. Z. Meng, Chem. Eng. J., 2009, 147: 287–296. DOI:10.1016/j.cej.2008.11.006
[15] A. Bansode, A. Urakawa, ACS Catal., 2014, 4: 3877–3880. DOI:10.1021/cs501221q
[16] X. L. Wu, Y. Z. Meng, M. Xiao, Y. X. Lu, J. Mol. Catal. A, 2006, 249: 93–97. DOI:10.1016/j.molcata.2006.01.007
[17] R. Srivastava, D. Srinivas, P. Ratnasamy, J. Catal., 2006, 241: 34–44. DOI:10.1016/j.jcat.2006.04.002
[18] J. Xu, H. T. Wu, C. M. Ma, B. Xue, Y. X. Li, Y. Cao, Appl. Catal. A, 2013, 464-465: 357–363. DOI:10.1016/j.apcata.2013.06.016
[19] C. Murugan, H. C. Bajaj, R. V. Jasra, Catal. Lett., 2010, 137: 224–231. DOI:10.1007/s10562-010-0348-6
[20] R. Juárez, A. Corma, H. García, Green Chem., 2009, 11: 949–952. DOI:10.1039/b902850a
[21] P. Kumar, V. C. Srivastava, I. M. Mishra, Catal. Commun., 2015, 60: 27–31. DOI:10.1016/j.catcom.2014.11.006
[22] H. Wang, M. H. Wang, N. Zhao, W. Wei, Y. H. Sun, Catal. Lett., 2005, 105: 253–257. DOI:10.1007/s10562-005-8699-0
[23] K. Yan, A. C. Chen, Fuel, 2014, 115: 101–108. DOI:10.1016/j.fuel.2013.06.042
[24] T. Wei, M. H. Wang, W. Wei, Y. H. Sun, B. Zhong, Green Chem., 2003, 5: 343–346. DOI:10.1039/b210716n
[25] K. Yan, G. S. Wu, W. Jin, Energy Technol., 2016, 4: 354–368. DOI:10.1002/ente.v4.3
[26] K. Yan, Y. Q. Liu, Y. R. Lu, J. J. Chai, L. P. Sun, Catal. Sci. Technol., 2017, 7: 1622–1645. DOI:10.1039/C7CY00274B
[27] K. Takehira, Appl. Clay Sci., 2017, 136: 112–141. DOI:10.1016/j.clay.2016.11.012
[28] H. S. Ji, W. H. Wu, F. H. Li, X. X. Yu, J. J. Fu, L. Y. Jia, J. Hazard. Mater., 2017, 334: 212–222. DOI:10.1016/j.jhazmat.2017.04.014
[29] N. B. Allou, P. Saikia, A. Borah, R. L. Goswamee, Colloid Polym. Sci., 2017, 295: 725–747. DOI:10.1007/s00396-017-4047-3
[30] Y. Lu, B. Jiang, L. Fang, F. L. Ling, F. Wu, B. S. Hu, F. M. Meng, K. Y. Niu, F. Lin, H. M. Zheng, J. Alloys Compd., 2017, 714: 63–70. DOI:10.1016/j.jallcom.2017.04.197
[31] L. P. Zheng, S. X. Xia, X. Y. Lu, Z. Y. Hou, Chin. J. Catal., 2015, 36: 1759–1765. DOI:10.1016/S1872-2067(15)60915-9
[32] L. P. Zheng, S. X. Xia, Z. T. Hou, M. Y. Zhang, Z. Y. Hou, Chin. J. Catal., 2014, 35: 310–318. DOI:10.1016/S1872-2067(12)60738-4
[33] L. J. Gao, G. Y. Teng, J. H. Lv, G. M. Xiao, Energy Fuels, 2010, 24: 646–651. DOI:10.1021/ef900800d
[34] C. S. Castro, L. C. F. Garcia, J. M. Assaf, Fuel Process. Technol., 2014, 125: 73–78. DOI:10.1016/j.fuproc.2014.03.024
[35] Z. Wang, P. Fongarland, G. Z. Lu, N. Essayem, J. Catal., 2014, 318: 108–118. DOI:10.1016/j.jcat.2014.07.006
[36] J. Kocík, I. Troppov, Fuel Process. Technol., 2015, 134: 297–302. DOI:10.1016/j.fuproc.2015.02.013
[37] F. Cavani, F. Trifirb, A. Vaccari, Catal. Today, 1991, 11: 173–301. DOI:10.1016/0920-5861(91)80068-K
[38] F. Li, Y. F. Wang, Q. Z. Yang, D. G. Evans, C. Forano, X. Duan, J. Hazard. Mater., 2005, 125: 89–95. DOI:10.1016/j.jhazmat.2005.04.037
[39] A. C. Vieira, R. L. Moreira, A. Dias, J. Phys. Chem. C, 2009, 113: 13358–13368. DOI:10.1021/jp902566r
[40] B. Yu, H. Bian, J. Plank, J. Phys. Chem. Solids, 2010, 71: 468–472. DOI:10.1016/j.jpcs.2009.12.013
[41] S. S. Peng, M. H. Yang, W. K. Zhang, X. N. Li, C. Wang, M. B. Yue, Microporous Mesoporous Mater., 2017, 242: 18–24. DOI:10.1016/j.micromeso.2017.01.011
[42] J. Li, D. Wang, G. D. Zhou, Y. X. Xue, C. Li, T. X. Cheng, Ind. Eng. Chem. Res., 2011, 50: 10955–10961. DOI:10.1021/ie201044z
[43] X. Chen, Y. Liu, G. Niu, Z. Yang, M. Bian, A. He, Appl. Catal. A, 2001, 205: 159–172. DOI:10.1016/S0926-860X(00)00575-5
[44] L. P. Haack, J. E. DeVries, K. Otto, M. S. Chattha, Appl. Catal. A, 1992, 82: 199–214. DOI:10.1016/0926-860X(92)85005-V
[45] J. S. Ledford, M. Houalla, A. Proctor, D. M. Hercules, L. Petrakis, J. Chem. Phys., 1989, 93: 6770–6777. DOI:10.1021/j100355a039
[46] A. F. LucrédioLucr, G. Tremiliosi Filho, E. M. Assaf, Appl. Surf. Sci., 2009, 255: 5851–5856. DOI:10.1016/j.apsusc.2009.01.020
[47] T. Gougousi, Z. Y. Chen, Thin Solid Films, 2008, 516: 6197–6204. DOI:10.1016/j.tsf.2007.11.104
[48] S. A. Barve, Jagannath, M. N. Deo, R. Kishore, A. Biswas, L. M. Gantayet, D. S. Patil, Appl. Surf. Sci., 2010, 257: 215–221. DOI:10.1016/j.apsusc.2010.06.067
[49] Y. Uwamino, T. Ishizuka, H. Yamatera, J. Electron. Spectrosc. Relat. Phenom., 1984, 34: 67–78. DOI:10.1016/0368-2048(84)80060-2
[50] J. Y. Wang, L. M. Yang, W. Luo, G. X. Yang, C. L. Miao, J. Y. Fu, S. Y. Xing, P. Fan, P. M. Lv, Z. M. Wang, Fuel, 2017, 196: 306–313. DOI:10.1016/j.fuel.2017.02.007
[51] L. L. Marciniuk, P. Hammer, H. O. Pastore, U. Schuchardt, D. Cardoso, Fuel, 2014, 118: 48–54. DOI:10.1016/j.fuel.2013.10.036
[52] J. Campbell, Int. Mater. Rev., 1994, 39: 125–125. DOI:10.1179/imr.1994.39.3.125
[53] G. Busca, Chem. Rev., 2010, 110: 2217–2249. DOI:10.1021/cr9000989
[54] H. Gorzawski, W. F. Hoelderich, J. Mol. Catal. A, 1999, 144: 181–187. DOI:10.1016/S1381-1169(98)00363-X
[55] G. D. Wu, X. L. Wang, W. Wei, Y. H. Sun, Appl. Catal. A, 2010, 377: 107–113. DOI:10.1016/j.apcata.2010.01.023
[56] P. Kumar, V. C. Srivastava, I. M. Mishra, Catal. Commun., 2015, 60: 27–31. DOI:10.1016/j.catcom.2014.11.006
[57] M. K. Lam, K. T. Lee, A. R. Mohamed, Appl. Catal. B, 2009, 93: 134–139. DOI:10.1016/j.apcatb.2009.09.022
[58] G. D. Wu, X. L. Wang, W. Wei, Y. H. Sun, Appl. Catal. A, 2010, 377: 107–113. DOI:10.1016/j.apcata.2010.01.023
[59] T. Wei, M. H. Wang, W. Wei, Y. H. Sun, B. Zhong, Fuel Process. Technol., 2003, 83: 175–182. DOI:10.1016/S0378-3820(03)00065-1