催化学报  2018, Vol. 39 Issue (3): 495-501   PDF    
扩展功能
加入收藏夹
复制引文信息
加入引用管理器
Email Alert
RSS
本文作者相关文章
Hongmei Zhao
Yunfei He
Meiying Liu
Ran Wang
Yunhe Li
Wansheng You
Biomolecule-assisted, cost-effective synthesis of a Zn0.9Cd0.1S solid solution for efficient photocatalytic hydrogen production under visible light
Hongmei Zhao, Yunfei He, Meiying Liu, Ran Wang, Yunhe Li, Wansheng You     
School of Chemistry and Chemical Engineering, Liaoning Normal University, Dalian 116029, Liaoning, China
* Corresponding author. Meiying Liu, Tel: +86-411-82159256; E-mail: myliu312@yahoo.com;
Wansheng You, Tel: +86-411-82159378; E-mail: wsyou@lnnu.edu.cn
Foundation item: This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (21573100, 21573099) and the Open Project of State Key Laboratory of Catalysis, Dalian Institute of Chemical Physics, Chinese Academy of Sciences (N-14-04)
Abstract: A series of alloyed Zn-Cd-S solid solutions with a cubic zinc blende structure were fabricated hydrothermally with the assistance of L-cystine under mild conditions. The products were characterized by XRD, TEM, HRTEM, XPS, UV-vis, and BET techniques, and the photocatalytic performance for the reduction of water to H2 on the solid solutions was evaluated in the presence of S2-/SO32- as hole scavengers under visible light illumination. Among all the samples, the highest photocatalytic activity was achieved over Zn0.9Cd0.1S with a rate of 4.4 mmol h-1 g-1, even without a co-catalyst, which far exceeded that of CdS. Moreover, Zn0.9Cd0.1S displayed excellent anti-photocorrosion properties during the photoreduction of water into H2. The enhancement in the photocatalytic performance was mainly attributed to the efficient charge transfer in the Zn0.9Cd0.1 alloyed structure and the high surface area. This work provides a simple, cost-effective and green technique, which can be generalized as a rational preparation route for the large-scale fabrication of metal sulfide photocatalysts.
© 2018, Dalian Institute of Chemical Physics, Chinese Academy of Sciences.
Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
Key words: Zn0.9Cd0.1S    L-cystine    Green synthesis    Photocatalytic hydrogen production    
生物分子辅助低成本制备Zn0.9Cd0.1S固溶体及其高效可见光光催化制氢
赵红梅, 何云飞, 刘美英, 王冉, 李云贺, 由万胜     
辽宁师范大学化学化工学院, 辽宁大连 116029
摘要:如何提高光催化制氢量子产率是太阳能分解水制氢研究的重点和焦点.Zn-Cd-S固溶体因具有窄的带隙宽度及合适的导带和价带位置而显示了广阔的应用前景.然而,两方面的问题限制了其规模化应用:(1)往往需负载Pt,Pd,Ru和Rh等贵金属助催化剂才能获得可观的光催化性能;(2)传统合成技术通常采用硫代乙酰胺、硫脲及硫化钠等昂贵且有毒的化学试剂作硫源.与上述硫源相比,生物小分子L-胱氨酸分子中含有-COOH、-NH2及-SH基团,这些基团易于与金属阳离子配位,因此能够有效调控硫源释放S2-的速度,硫化物的形貌、尺寸以及取向能够灵活地得到调控.另外,在强碱或强酸性介质中,L-胱氨酸具有良好的水溶性,因此材料的合成可选择在水介质中,这对光催化过程是非常关键的,有利于改善材料在光催化反应过程中的稳定性.基于此,本文以经济环保的生物小分子作硫源,制备了高效、稳定且有可见光响应的纳米硫化物光催化体系,旨在发展环境友好、条件温和、成本低廉、操作简单和易于工业化生产的绿色制备技术,. 以L-胱氨酸为硫源和结构导向剂,采用水热合成技术在温和条件下制备了立方相结构的Zn-Cd-S固溶体光催化剂,采用XRD,TEM,HRTEM,XPS,UV-vis及N2吸附等手段表征了其结构和形貌.结果表明,随Zn含量增加,其带隙在2.11-3.19eV间连续可调.在可见光(λ > 420nm)照射、无助催化剂和Na2S/Na2SO3水溶液为牺牲剂的条件下研究了其光催化制氢的性能.其中Zn0.9Cd0.1S具有最佳的光催化活性,其产氢速率约为4.4mmol h-1 g-1(无助催化剂,远高于CdS),且显示优良的稳定性及抗光腐蚀能力.通过经验公式计算得出了其能带结构示意图,结果表明,ZnxCd1-xS固溶体的导带和价带的位置随着Zn含量的增加而向更负的导带和更正的价带移动.固溶体导带电位更负促进更有效的氢产生,电位价带更正导致电荷更容易发生转移.Zn0.9Cd0.1S高的光催化活性可能归因于中等的导带边缘和最合适的带隙.最后利用光电流及交流阻抗阐明了其光生电子-空穴对的分离及迁移机理.与CdS相比,Zn-Cd-S固溶体的形成促进了光生载流子在界面间的传输,抑制了其快速复合,从而大幅度改善了光催化活性及稳定性.该硫化物纳米晶的绿色制备技术期望可推广到其它硫化物可见光光催化体系.
关键词Zn0.9Cd0.1S    胱氨酸    绿色合成    光催化制氢    

1 Introduction

The development of visible-light-responsive photocatalysts to realize water splitting is a challenging research topic but essential because of the potential to generate clean hydrogen fuel from renewable energy resources [1]. So far, a variety of nanomaterials, such as sulfides, nitrides, carbides, and silicides, have been developed as potential candidates for visible light-driven photocatalysts [2-5]. Among photocatalyst candidates, CdS has been a focus of great interest owing to its suitable band gap (Eg = 2.4 eV) for visible light absorption and a more negative conduction band level (-0.9 eV vs. NHE) than the reduction potential of H+/H2 [6]. However, short-lived charge carriers, photocorrosion under visible light, environmental risk of toxic cadmium as well as the requirement for noble metals as co-catalysts prohibits the wide application of CdS [6-10]. The alloying of semiconductors of different band-gap potentials with CdS to construct solid solution photocatalysts with tunable electronic structure, such as Cd1-xZnxS, Cd1-xMnxS, and Cd1-xNixS, is considered a feasible strategy to address these problems [11-13]. Among them, the ternary Zn-Cd-S alloy system has gained significant interest owing to the easy formation of uniform solid solutions, composition-tunable optoelectronic properties as well as the various potential applications, especially in photocatalysis [14-23]. To date, several techniques have been reported for the growth of ZnxCd1-xS solid solutions with various sizes and morphologies to achieve superior photocatalytic performance. Unfortunately, these conventional approaches usually involve the use of high temperatures above 160 ℃ and the presence of toxic chemicals including organic solvents, surfactants, and reducing agent to control the activity of the ions [14-17]. In particular, the use of expensive and highly poisonous sulfur agents including Na2S, thioactamide, thiourea, and dimethyl sulfoxide leads to the liberation of a large amount of environmentally toxic H2S, and thus, is not suitable for large-scale production [18-23].

Keeping the above points in mind, our aim was to develop a facile, green, template-free hydrothermal route under mild conditions for the synthesis of ZnxCd1-xS solid solutions by employing the nontoxic biomolecule L-cystine as the sulfur source. As known, L-cystine contains several functional groups, such as -SH, -NH2 and -COOH, which exhibit a strong affinity towards metal cations to form a metal-ligand complex [24-27]. The complex would release S2- by thermal decomposition in a sustained manner at a relatively slow rate, which is beneficial for the nucleation and growth of well-dispersed ZnxCd1-xS nanoparticles. Hence, in this case, L-cystine acts as both a sulfur source and the coordinating agent. Unlike the aforementioned methods, no additional templates, highly-toxic sulfur precursors, and poisonous organic solvents are involved in this process. More interestingly, the as-obtained Zn0.9Cd0.1S with less cadmium exhibits an efficient and stable activity towards H2 production under visible-light irradiation without a co-catalyst, with a rate of 4.4 mmol h-1 g-1, which far exceeds that of CdS. The origin of such a super-high photocatalytic performance of Zn0.9Cd0.1S under visible light was studied by BET specific surface area measurements, the transient photocurrent (TPC) responses, and electrochemical impedance spectroscopy (EIS) techniques.

2 Experimental
2.1 Materials

Zinc acetate dihydrate (Zn(CH3COO)2·2H2O), L-cystine (C6H12N2O4S2), cadmium acetate dihydrate (Cd(CH3COO)2· 2H2O), and NaOH were purchased from Sinopharm Chemical Reagent Co. Ltd (Shanghai, China). All chemicals used in the experiments were of analytical grade.

2.2 Synthesis of ZnxCd1-xS

In a typical synthesis, 1.5 mmol of L-cystine was dissolved in 16 mL of deionized water. The pH of the solution was adjusted to 10-11 by the addition of an aqueous NaOH solution. Meanwhile, different molar ratios of Zn(OAc)2·2H2O and Cd(OAc)2·2H2O with a total sum of 6 mmol were dissolved in another 16 mL of deionized water. Then, the above two solutions were mixed together with vigorous stirring to form a milky suspension. Finally, the mixed slurry was transferred into a 45 mL stainless steel autoclave, which was heated to 140 ℃ and maintained at this temperature for 10 h. After they were cooled naturally to room temperature, the samples were collected, alternately rinsed with deionized water and ethanol, and then dried at 60 ℃ prior to use.

2.3 Characterization

The structure and phase of the products were identified by X-ray diffraction (XRD) analysis on a Bruker D8 Advance diffractometer with Cu-Kα irradiation operating at 40 kV and 40 mA. UV-visible spectra were recorded on a Perkin-Elmer Lambda 3 spectrophotometer by adopting BaSO4 as a 100% reference standard and were converted from reflectance to absorbance by the Kubelka-Munk function. The morphologies and particle sizes of the samples were revealed by transmission electron microscopy (TEM, FEI Tecnai Spirit) and high-resolution transmission electron microscopy (HRTEM, FEI Tecnai F30). The samples were grounded, ultrasonically dispersed in ethanol, and then stuck to a Cu grid. The surface electronic state was analyzed with an ESCALAB250 X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS) with Al-Kα (1486.6 eV) radiation under ultrahigh vacuum (< 2 × 10-9 Torr). All the binding energies were calibrated to the C 1s peak at 284.6 eV. The Brunauer-Emmett-Teller (BET) specific surface areas were evaluated by N2 adsorption-desorption isotherms at -196 ℃ (Beckman Coulter SA3100) after the samples were outgassed at 100 ℃ for 2 h under vacuum.

2.4 Photocatalytic hydrogen production

Photocatalytic H2-production experiments were conducted in a closed gas circulation using a 300 W Xe lamp with a cut-off filter (λ ≥ 420 nm). 50 mg of the ZnxCd1-xS powder was dispersed into 200 mL of an aqueous solution of 0.43 mol L-1 Na2S-0.5 mol L-1 Na2SO3. Prior to the reaction, the system was thoroughly evacuated and then filled with approximately 30 Torr of Ar gas. A shutter window filled with water was positioned between the lamp and the reaction pool to eliminate infrared irradiation. The temperature of the working solution was maintained at about 10 ℃ by circulating water. The evolved H2 was analyzed online by gas chromatography (TCD, molecular sieve 5-Å column, and Ar carrier).

2.5 Photoelectrochemical measurements

The TPC and EIS analysis were measured in a standard three-electrode quartz cell with a CHI604B electrochemical workstation (Shanghai Chenhua Instrument Corp., China). A Pt foil and a saturated calomel electrode (SCE) were used as the counter and reference electrodes, and the as-obtained samples coated on F-doped SnO2 (FTO) conductive glass was employed as the working electrode. The working electrode was fabricated using the screen-printing technique described in previous work [28]. All electrodes had a similar thickness (10-11 μm). A 0.43 mol L-1 Na2S-0.5 mol L-1 Na2SO3 aqueous solution was used as the electrolyte and a 300-W Xe lamp (λ ≥ 420 nm) was used as the visible light source.

3 Results and discussion

Powder XRD was conducted to analyze the crystalline phase and purity of the products. The XRD patterns of the ZnxCd1-xS (x = 0, 0.1, 0.3, 0.5, 0.7, 0.9, and 1.0) solid solutions as well as the standard diffraction peaks of CdS and ZnS reported by the JCPDS are shown in Fig. 1(a). All the samples exhibited similar diffraction characteristics that could be assigned to a zinc-blende-type structure. The absence of any other phases or impurities indicated the high purity of the as-obtained products. With an increasing amount of Zn2+ content, the diffraction peaks systematically shifted to the higher-angle sides from CdS (JCPDS 65-2887) to ZnS (JCPDS 80-0020), indicating the formation of homogeneous cubic ZnxCd1-xS solid solutions instead of merely a physical mixture of CdS and ZnS. The calculated lattice constants for the ZnxCd1-xS solid solutions obtained by fitting the XRD patterns according to the MDI Jade5.0 software are listed in Table 1. Fig. 1(b) displays the dependence of the lattice parameters (1) on the Zn2+ content x. The lattice constant decreased almost linearly as the Zn2+ content increased. This phenomenon obeyed the well-known Vegard's law [29, 30], which rules out the separate nucleation of CdS or ZnS nanocrystals. The subsequent fringe lattice constriction was attributed to the larger ionic radius of Cd2+ (0.97 Å) relative to that of Zn2+ (0.74 Å) [31]. Additionally, the relatively small discrepancy in the electronegativity between Cd (1.69) and Zn (1.65) was favorable for the formation of Zn-Cd-S solid solutions [32]. Meanwhile, the structural similarity between ZnS and CdS confirmed by XRD data also facilitated the formation of a Zn-Cd-S alloyed structure [32].

Table 1
Samples and their physicochemical properties and H2 evolution rates.
Fig. 1. (a) XRD patterns of ZnxCd1-xS solid solutions with various x values: (1) 0; (2) 0.1; (3) 0.3; (4) 0.5; (5) 0.7; (6) 0.9; (7) 1. (b) Dependence of lattice constants on the Zn content (x) of ZnxCd1-xS solid solutions.

Fig. 2 displays the UV-vis diffuse-reflectance absorption spectra of ZnxCd1-xS, CdS, and ZnS. All the ZnxCd1-xS samples showed an intense absorption band with a steep edge, which indicated that the absorption was caused by an intrinsic band-gap transition from the valence band to the conduction band rather than the transition from impurity levels [33]. The absorption edges of the ZnxCd1-xS solid solutions shifted monotonically to longer wavelengths with increasing Cd2+/Zn2+ molar ratio, which was consistent with the shift of the XRD peaks to higher angles (Fig. 1), further confirming the formation of ZnxCd1-xS solid solutions. The band gaps of the solid solutions were estimated to be 2.11-3.19 eV (x = 0-1) from the plots of (αhν)2 versus (in which α and are the absorption coefficient and the incident photon energy, respectively) by linearly extrapolating to zero across the x axis (a straight line to the x-axis).

Fig. 2. UV-Vis absorption spectra and the plots of (αhν)2 versus (inset) of ZnxCd1-xS solid solutions with various x value: (1) 0; (2) 0.1; (3) 0.3; (4) 0.5; (5) 0.7; (6) 0.9; (7) 1.

The TEM and HRTEM images of the Zn0.9Cd0.1S sample with the maximum H2 generation rate are displayed in Fig. 3. Clearly, the sample was composed of nanoparticles with a size range from 30 to 100 nm. Further observation indicated that each nanoparticle was composed of smaller primary nanocrystals with a size of 3-8 nm. The well-defined lattice fringes of the Zn0.9Cd0.1S nanocrystal demonstrate its highly crystalline nature. The spacing of the lattice fringes was approximately 0.326 nm, corresponding to the interplanar distance of the (111) plane of Zn0.9Cd0.1S with a cubic zinc blende phase [34]. The surface compositions and electronic structures of the Zn0.9Cd0.1S sample were further analyzed by XPS, as presented in Fig. 4. The spectrum of the survey scan clearly demonstrated the existence of Zn, Cd, and S as well as C and O. The appearance of very small amounts of C and O signals resulted from the carbon tape and the adsorbed oxygen, respectively. The doublet peaks for Zn 2p (1021.7 and 1044.5 eV), Cd 3d (411.5 and 404.7 eV), and S 2p (161.3 and 162. 1 eV) were assigned to the spin-orbit split components of the Cd2+, Zn2+, and S2- ions. The binding energies were in good agreement with the data reported in the literature [35, 36].

Fig. 3. TEM and HRTEM (inset) images of the Zn0.9Cd0.1S solid solution.
Fig. 4. XPS spectra of the Zn0.9Cd0.1S solid solution. (a) Survey spectrum; (b) Zn 2p; (c) Cd 3d; (d) S 2p.

The photocatalytic performance of the ZnxCd1-xS solid solutions for the decomposition of water to H2 under visible light irradiation (λ > 420 nm) was evaluated using S2-/SO32- as hole scavengers, as presented in Fig. 5(a). The H2 production rate was monitored during 3 h of continuous illumination. No H2 was detected over ZnS because ZnS (3.21 eV) is only active under UV light [37]. Only a trace amount of hydrogen was produced over naked CdS (0.03 mmol h-1 g-1), owing to the rapid recombination of the photogenerated e--h+ pairs [6]. In contrast, the ZnxCd1-xS solid solutions exhibited much superior performance for photocatalytic water reduction compared to CdS. A gradual improvement in the H2 evolution activity was observed with the increase of the Zn2+ content. The highest activity was achieved over the Zn0.9Cd0.1S catalyst, with a H2 evolution rate of 4.4 mmol h-1 g-1 even without the addition of a cocatalyst, which far exceeded that of CdS. A further increase of the Zn2+ content led to a deterioration of the photocatalytic performance. In previous reports, the optimum activity was generally realized in a solid solution with a higher Cd/Zn molar ratio in the hexagonal-wurtzite structure [14, 38]. However, in this work, the optimum composition consisted of a very low Cd2+ content in the cubic-blende structure. The difference in the optimum composition is considered to originate from the difference in the crystalline structure, resulting in different charge-transfer paths [34, 39, 40]. The stability of the Zn0.9Cd0.1S catalyst was investigated by performing consecutive recycle experiments under identical reaction conditions, as demonstrated in Fig. 5(b). There was a slight decrease in activity in the second run owing to the consumption of the sacrificial reagents with prolonged reaction time. The activity was recovered in the third cycle by adopting a fresh aqueous solution of S2-/SO32-, indicating that the photocatalyst was essentially stable during the photocatalytic water reduction to H2 under visible light illumination.

Fig. 5. (a) Comparison of the photocatalytic activity of the ZnxCd1-xS solid solutions for H2 evolution under visible light irradiation. Reaction conditions: 50 mg catalyst, 100 mL aqueous solution containing 0.43 mol L-1 Na2S and 0.5 mol L-1 Na2SO3, 300 W Xe lamp (λ > 420 nm). (b) Recyclability test by monitoring the time courses of H2 evolution over the Zn0.9Cd0.1S solid solution under visible light irradiation.

Generally, photocatalysts with higher specific surface areas are favorable for the improvement of the H2 production activity owing to the increase in the surface to volume ratio [41]. The BET surface areas of the as-synthesized samples were investigated by nitrogen adsorption-desorption measurement and are listed in Table 1. The high BET surface area of Zn0.9Cd0.1S is self-explanatory to validate higher activity. In addition, the charge separation and transfer efficiency of photoinduced e- -h+ pairs was also considered to significantly influence the photocatalytic activity [42-44]. Thus, the surface and bulk charge-transfer behavior was examined by the TPC response and EIS by constructing a three-electrode system. A comparison of the photocurrent-time (I-t) curves for the as-fabricated CdS, Zn0.9Cd0.1S, and ZnS electrodes with five on-off cycles of intermittent visible light illumination is shown in Fig. 6(a). All electrodes showed an instant and reproducible photocurrent response upon irradiation. Further observations showed that the photocurrent of the Zn0.5Cd0.5S electrode was significantly enhanced as compared to those of the ZnS and CdS electrodes, indicating the improvement of the charge transfer and the suppression of the charge recombination by constructing an alloyed Zn0.9Cd0.1S solid solution [45, 46]. The electron-transfer behavior occurring in the Zn0.9Cd0.1S electrode was further corroborated by the EIS Nyquist plot (Fig. 6(b)). Generally, the semicircle in the Niquist plot reflects a lower charge-transfer resistance [47, 48]. The alloyed Zn0.9Cd0.1S electrode exhibited the smallest arc radius, which implied more efficient interfacial charge-carrier separation and transfer. Based on the TPC and EIS analysis, the separation and transport of photoinduced electron-hole pairs was facilitated owing to the formation of alloyed Zn1-xCdxS solid solutions, which, in turn, significantly boosted the photocatalytic performance for water reduction to hydrogen under visible light.

Fig. 6. (a) TPC responses and (b) EIS Nyquist plots of CdS, Zn0.9Cd0.1S, and ZnS electrodes in 0.43 mol L-1 Na2S-0.5 mol L-1 Na2SO3 aqueous solution under visible light irradiation.
4 Conclusions

A series of efficient visible-light-responsive Zn1-xCdxS solid solutions with a cubic zinc blende structure were successfully synthesized through a low-temperature L-cystine-assisted hydrothermal approach. The whole process was facile, cost-effective, and ecofriendly, which is very promising for large-scale applications. The optimum activity was achieved over the Zn0.9Cd0.1S catalyst, which had a H2 generation rate of 4.4 mmol h-1 g-1 even without the loading of a noble-metal co-catalyst. In addition, this photocatalyst contained a lower amount of toxic Cd, which is significantly important from an environmental point of view.

Acknowledgments

We sincerely thank Dr. Jingying Shi of State Key Laboratory of Catalysis, National Laboratory for Clean Energy, Dalian Institute of Chemical Physics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, for the helpful suggestions and discussions.

References
[1] A. Fujishima, Honda, Nature, 1972, 238: 37–38. DOI:10.1038/238037a0
[2] T. Hisatomi, J. Kubota, K. Domen, Chem. Soc. Rev., 2014, 43: 7520–7535. DOI:10.1039/C3CS60378D
[3] S. U. M. Khan, M. Alshahry, W. B. Ingler, Science, 2002, 297: 2243–2245. DOI:10.1126/science.1075035
[4] P. Ritterskamp, A. Kuklya, M. A. Wüstkamp, K. Kerpen, C. Weidenthaler, M. Demuth, Angew. Chem. Int. Ed., 2007, 46: 7770–7774. DOI:10.1002/(ISSN)1521-3773
[5] T. Ohmori, H. Mametsuka, E. Suzuki, Int. J. Hydrogen Energy, 2000, 25: 953–955. DOI:10.1016/S0360-3199(00)00014-8
[6] J. R. Ran, G. P. Gao, F. T. Li, T. Y. Ma, A. J. Du, S. Z. Qiao, Nat. Commun., 2017, 8: 13907–13917. DOI:10.1038/ncomms13907
[7] H. J. Yan, J. H. Yang, G. J. Ma, G. P. Wu, X. Zong, Z. B. Lei, J. Y. Shi, C. Li, J. Catal., 2009, 266: 165–168. DOI:10.1016/j.jcat.2009.06.024
[8] M. Y. Liu, W. S. You, Z. B. Lei, G. H. Zhou, J. J. Yang, G. P. Wu, G. J. Ma, G. Y. Luan, T. Takata, M. Hara, K. Domen, C. Li, Chem. Commun., 2004: 2192–2193.
[9] H. Du, Y. N. Liu, C. C. Shen, A. W. Xu, Chin. J. Catal., 2017, 38: 1295–1306.
[10] D. C. Jiang, Z. J. Sun, H. X. Jia, D. P. Lu, P. W. Du, J. Mater. Chem. A, 2016, 4: 675–683. DOI:10.1039/C5TA07420G
[11] K. Manjodh, C. M. Nagaraja, ACS Sustainable Chem. Eng., 2017, 5: 4293–4303. DOI:10.1021/acssuschemeng.7b00325
[12] K. IKeua, S. Shiiba, M. Machida, Chem. Mater., 2010, 22: 743–745. DOI:10.1021/cm9026013
[13] W. Chen, G. R. Duan, T. Y. Liu, Z. M. Jia, X. H. Liu, S. M. Chen, X. J. Yang, J. Mater. Sci., 2015, 50: 3920–3928. DOI:10.1007/s10853-015-8938-8
[14] L. H. Zhu, Y. Wang, D. Z. Zhang, C. Li, D. M. Sun, S. P. Wen, Y. Chen, S. P. Ruan, ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces, 2015, 7: 20793–20800. DOI:10.1021/acsami.5b05845
[15] Y. F. Chai, G. F. Huang, L. L. Wang, W. Q. Huang, J. Zhou, Mater. Lett., 2015, 142: 133–136. DOI:10.1016/j.matlet.2014.10.038
[16] Z. W. Mei, B. K. Zhang, J. X. Zheng, S. Yuan, Z. Q. Zhuo, X. G. Meng, Z. H. Chen, K. Amine, W. L. Yang, L. W. Wang, W. Wang, S. F. Wang, Q. H. Gong, J. Li, F. S. Liu, F. Pan, Nano Energy, 2016, 26: 405–416. DOI:10.1016/j.nanoen.2016.05.051
[17] Y. Y. Hsu, N. T. Suen, C. C. Chang, S. F. Hung, C. L. Chen, T. S. Chan, C. L. Dong, C. C. Chan, S. Y. Chen, H. M. Chen, ACS Appl. Mater Interfaces, 2015, 7: 22558–22569. DOI:10.1021/acsami.5b06872
[18] I. Levchuk, C. Würth, F. Krause, A. Osvet, M. Batentschuk, U. Resch-Genger, C. Kolbeck, H. P. Steinrueck, W. H. Peukert, C. J. Brabec, Energy Environ. Sci., 2016, 9: 1083–1094. DOI:10.1039/C5EE03165F
[19] M. C. Liu, D. W. Jing, Z. H. Zhou, L. J. Guo, Nat. Commun., 2013, 4: 2278–2285.
[20] S. N. Garaje, S. K. Apte, S. D. Naik, J. D. Ambekar, R. S. Sonawane, M. V. Kulkarni, A. Vinu, B. B. Kale, Environ. Sci. Technol., 2013, 47: 6664–6672. DOI:10.1021/es3045955
[21] A. P. Ma, Z. H. Tang, S. L. Shen, L. J. Zhi, J. H. Yang, RSC Adv., 2015, 5: 27829–27836. DOI:10.1039/C5RA01846C
[22] Z. H. Han, G. Chen, C. M. Li, Y. G. Yu, Y. S. Zhou, J. Mater. Chem. A, 2015, 3: 1696–1702. DOI:10.1039/C4TA05615A
[23] J. U. Kim, Y. K. Kim, H. Yang, J. Colloid Interf. Sci., 2010, 341: 59–63. DOI:10.1016/j.jcis.2009.09.039
[24] A. K. Nayak, S. Lee, Y. Sohnb, D. Pradhan, CrystEngComm, 2014, 16: 8064–8072. DOI:10.1039/C4CE00836G
[25] E. Furia, G. Sindona, J. Chem. Eng. Data, 2010, 55: 2985–2989. DOI:10.1021/je901042y
[26] M. D. Đurović, Ž. D. Bugarčić, F. W. Heinemann, R. Van.Eldik, Dalton Trans., 2014, 43: 3911–3921. DOI:10.1039/C3DT53140F
[27] A. Frank, A. S. Wochnik, T. Bein, C. Scheu, RSC Adv., 2017, 7: 20219–20230. DOI:10.1039/C6RA27294K
[28] M. Y. Liu, H. Chen, H. M. Zhao, Y. F. He, Y. H. Li, R. Wang, L. C. Zhang, W. S. You, Dalton Trans., 2017, 46: 9407–9414. DOI:10.1039/C7DT01729D
[29] L. Vegard, H. Schjelderup, Phys. Z., 1917, 18: 93–96.
[30] H. S. Zhou, H. Sasahara, I. Honma, H. Komiyama, J. W. Haus, Chem. Mater., 1994, 6: 1534–1541. DOI:10.1021/cm00045a010
[31] J. S. Steckel, J. P. Zimmer, S. CoeSullivan, N. E. Stott, V. Bulovi, M. G. Bawendi, Angew. Chem. Int. Ed., 2004, 43: 2154–2158. DOI:10.1002/(ISSN)1521-3773
[32] D. H. Wang, L. Wang, A. W. Xu, Nanoscale, 2012, 4: 2046–2053. DOI:10.1039/c2nr11972b
[33] I. Tsuji, H. Kato, H. Kobayashi, A. Kudo, J. Phys. Chem. B, 2005, 109: 7323–7329. DOI:10.1021/jp044722e
[34] W. Lu, W. Z. Wang, M. Shang, W. Z. Yin, S. M. Sun, L. Zhang, Int. J. Hydrogen Energy, 2010, 35: 19–25. DOI:10.1016/j.ijhydene.2009.10.084
[35] M. Marychurch, G. C. Morris, Surf. Sci., 1985, 154: 251–254.
[36] H. Du, K. Liang, C. Z. Yuan, H. L. Guo, X. Zhou, Y. F. Jiang, A. W. Xu, ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces, 2017, 4: 24550–24558.
[37] J. F. Reber, K. Meier, J. Phys. Chem., 1984, 88: 5903–5913. DOI:10.1021/j150668a032
[38] M. Y. Liu, Y. F. He, H. Chen, H. M. Zhao, W. S. You, J. Y. Shi, L. C. Zhang, J. S. Li, Int. J. Hydrogen Energy, 2017, 42: 20970–20978. DOI:10.1016/j.ijhydene.2017.06.196
[39] L. W. Yin, Y. Bando, J. H. Zhan, M. S. Li, D. Golberg, Adv Mater., 2005, 17: 1972–1977. DOI:10.1002/(ISSN)1521-4095
[40] Y. C. Zhu, Y. Bando, D. F Xue, D. Golberg, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2003, 125: 16196–16177. DOI:10.1021/ja037965d
[41] Q. Li, H. Meng, P. Zhou, Y. Q. Zheng, J. Wang, J. G. Yu, J. R. Gong, ACS Catal., 2013, 3: 882–889. DOI:10.1021/cs4000975
[42] X. Zong, H. J. Yan, G. P. Wu, G. J. Ma, F. Y. Wen, L. Wang, C. Li, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2008, 130: 7176–7177. DOI:10.1021/ja8007825
[43] J. Bisquert, A. Zaban, M. Greenshtein, I. Mora-Seró, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2004, 126: 13550–13559. DOI:10.1021/ja047311k
[44] Z. H. Han, G. Chen, C. M. Li, Y. G. Yu, Y. S. Zhou, J. Mater. Chem. A, 2015, 3: 1696–1702. DOI:10.1039/C4TA05615A
[45] S. Chakrabarty, K. Chakraborty, A. Laha, T. Pal, S. Ghosh, J. Phys. Chem. C, 2014, 118: 28283–28290. DOI:10.1021/jp509575p
[46] A. Hagfeldt, H. Lindstrçm, S. Sçdergren, S. E. Lindquist, J. Electroanal. Chem., 1995, 381: 39–46. DOI:10.1016/0022-0728(94)03622-A
[47] A. Jana, C. Bhattacharya, J. Datta, Electrochim. Acta, 2010, 55: 6553–6562. DOI:10.1016/j.electacta.2010.06.022
[48] J. Zhang, J. G. Yu, M. Jaroniec, J. R. Gong, Nano Lett., 2012, 12: 4584–4589. DOI:10.1021/nl301831h