催化学报  2018, Vol. 39 Issue (8): 1373-1383   PDF    
扩展功能
加入收藏夹
复制引文信息
加入引用管理器
Email Alert
RSS
本文作者相关文章
Chengjiang Zhang
Lijun Tian
Lianqin Chen
Xiaofang Li
Kangle Lv
Kejian Deng
One-pot topotactic synthesis of Ti3+ self-doped 3D TiO2 hollow nanoboxes with enhanced visible light response
Chengjiang Zhanga, Lijun Tiana, Lianqin Chena, Xiaofang Lib, Kangle Lva, Kejian Denga     
a. Key Laboratory of Catalysis and Materials Science of the State Ethnic Affairs Commission & Ministry of Education, South-Central University for Nationalities, Wuhan 430074, Hubei, China;
b. College of Chemistry and Chemical Engineering, Wuhan University of Science and Technology, Wuhan 430081, Hubei, China
* Corresponding author. Lianqin, Chen Tel/Fax: +86-27-67842752; E-mail:lqchen@mail.scuec.edu.cn
Foundation item: The work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (20702064, 21177161, 31402137), Hubei Province Science Fund for Distinguished Yong Scholars (2013CFA034) and the Program for Excellent Talents in Hubei Province (RCJH15001), the Opening Project of Key Laboratory of Green Catalysis of Sichuan Institutes of High Education (LYZ1107), and the Fundamental Research Funds for the Central University, South-Central University for Nationalities (CZP17077)
Abstract: Ti3+ self-doped anatase three-dimensional (3D) TiO2 hollow nanoboxes were synthesized via a topological transformation process involving template participation by a facile one-pot hydrothermal treatment with an ethanol solution of zinc powder and TiOF2. It is worth noting that the 3D TiO2 hollow nanoboxes are assembled from six single-crystal nanosheets and have dominant exposure of the {001} facets. It is found from EPR spectra that adding zinc powder is an environment-friendly and effective strategy to introduce Ti3+ and oxygen vacancy (Ov) into the bulk of 3D hollow nanoboxes rather than the surface, which is responsible for their enhanced visible photocatalytic properties. The photocatalytic activity was evaluated by measuring the formation rate of hydroxide free radicals using 7-hydroxycoumarin as a probe. The sample prepared with zinc/TiOF2 mass ratio of 0.25 exhibited the highest RhB photodegradation activity under visible-light irradiation with a degradation rate of 96%, which is 4.0-times higher than that of pure TiO2. The results suggest a novel approach to construct in-situ 3D hierarchical TiO2 hollow nanoboxes doped with Ti3+ and Ov without introducing any impurity elements for superior visible-light photocatalytic activity.
© 2018, Dalian Institute of Chemical Physics, Chinese Academy of Sciences.
Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
Key words: Ti3+ self-doped    Topological transformation    Three-dimensional hollow nanoboxes    Visible light response    Photocatalytic activity    
拓扑相变制备具有拓宽可见光响应范围的Ti3+自掺杂3D空盒状TiO2
张成江a, 田丽君a, 陈连清a, 黎小芳b, 吕康乐a, 邓克俭a     
a. 中南民族大学催化材料科学国家民委-教育部重点实验室, 湖北武汉 430074;
b. 武汉科技大学化学化工学院, 湖北武汉 430081
摘要:TiO2广泛用作半导体光催化材料,但由于自身对光利用率低(只吸收紫外光)、禁带宽度较大、光生载流子复合率极高,限制了它在相关领域的应用.为此,设计了Ti3+离子自掺杂来克服TiO2半导体材料的上述缺点,进而提高其光催化活性.在不引入其他元素的情况下,以TiOF2为原料,Zn粉为还原剂,在水热条件下采用拓扑相变法原位制备了具有可见光响应的Ti3+自掺杂空盒状TiO2(记为Ti3+/TiO2)催化剂材料.掺杂金属离子可以改变半导体TiO2的结晶度和产生晶格缺陷,形成电子或空穴的捕获中心,影响电子-空穴对的复合;同时,掺杂金属离子产生的晶格缺陷有利于Ti3+和氧空位的形成,有利于提高TiO2的量子效率.Ti3+掺杂是一种既清洁又未引入其他金属离子的掺杂改性方法,它能有效保持催化剂的结构和形貌不受其他金属离子的影响.总之,金属离子掺杂有效拓展了TiO2的光吸收范围,并极大地提高了TiO2的光催化活性. 本文研究了不同量的还原剂对催化剂空盒状TiO2结构形貌影响,以及在可见光下光催化降解罗丹明B反应性能,发现Ti3+/TiO2催化剂均拥有非常好的光催化活性,其中R0.25催化剂在可见光下120min,RhB降解率达到96%,是TiO2的4倍多.且可循环使用5次的光催化循环降解实验后,表现出较高的稳定性.催化剂经过Ti3+自掺杂后,对催化剂自身的空盒状结构形貌并无很大的影响,随着还原剂Zn粉的量增加,Ti4+还原形成Ti3+数量增加,导致形成更多的氧空位.皆为锐钛矿型TiO2,与未掺杂Ti3+的TiO2比较发现,自掺杂Ti3+的TiO2的(105)XRD衍射峰越来越尖锐,(004)衍射峰越来越宽.随着还原剂Zn粉质量的逐渐增加,催化剂的光响应范围拓宽到可见光区,且逐渐增强.这说明Ti3+的掺杂不仅提高了TiO2在可见光的响应能力,也提高了TiO2在紫外光范围的响应能力.另外,掺杂后的TiO2禁带宽度的减小,使其价带上的电子更容易被可见光激发,产生更多的电子-空穴对参与光催化反应,从而提高TiO2的光催化效率.
关键词Ti3+自掺杂    拓扑相变    3维空盒子    可见光响应    光催化活性    

1 Introduction

Due to its excellent application in solving the energy crisis and environmental pollution, anatase TiO2 has attracted much attention for its chemical stability, low toxicity, photo oxidation properties, and environmental friendliness [1]. However, anatase TiO2 is not a suitable candidate for practical applications due to its large energy gap and rapid recombination of photo-generated electron-hole pairs [2-6]. Therefore, developing a simple method to overcome the 3.2-eV band gap and expand the absorption edge of titanium dioxide to the visible light range should be studied further [7].

An effective solution to this challenge is to dope the surface or bulk of TiO2 by modifying or co-doping with different metal or non-metallic ions [8, 9]. Metallic or non-metallic elements, such as Cu2+, Fe3+, N and S, act as electron acceptors or donors in the forbidden band of the photocatalyst and induce obvious absorption in the visible light range [10, 11]. However, the introduction of other impurity elements may permit hazardous dopants to enter the environment. Other impurity elements may cause thermal instability, doping induced charge recombination, requires expensive ion implantation equipment, and generates more carrier recombination centers. Therefore, it will greatly hinder the photocatalytic activity of titanium dioxide and critically restrain its actual application [12].

Ti3+ self-doping is a desirable doping modification method which does not require other metal or non-metallic ion impurities and effectively maintains the structure and morphology of TiO2. The formation of Ti3+ or Ov is an effective and environmental-friendly strategy for improving visible light absorption [13]. Until now, only a few methods have been capable of producing Ti3+ and Ov-doped TiO2 nanosheets. Nonetheless, there is still no effective approach for synthesizing Ti3+ self-doped three-dimensional (3D) TiO2 hollow nanomaterials. For example, Si et al. [14] used a simple solution reaction to prepare reduced TiO2 nanosheets with high energy facets. However, controlling the Ov concentration is difficult, and Ti3+ ions are introduced into the surface rather than the bulk of the catalyst. This could significantly inhibit its practical application in different visible light systems. At the same time, these methods are limited because of their high cost, complex processing techniques, and small production scale. Although the preparation and photocatalytic activity of reduced TiO2 nanomaterials have aroused great interest, research on Ti3+ self-doping is far from satisfactory, and there are still many problems left to be resolved in this research area, especially regarding preparation of 3D TiO2 materials with hollow structure [15].

The phase structure and crystal facets play an important role in TiO2 catalysts. In recent years, various 3D TiO2 structures with hollow morphology have been synthesized by various methods, such as TiO2 tubular structures or hollow spheres constructed from nanorods, nanowires, nanosheets or nanoparticles. However, these three-dimensional structures are primarily based on spherical morphology, which consist of randomly assembled building blocks. The preparation of non-spherical 3D TiO2 hollow nanomaterials composed of an ordered superstructure or hierarchical structure, such as boxes, remains a major challenge. The relationship between the catalytic properties and high-energy {001} facets has recently attracted an explosion of interest [16]. Both theoretical and experimental analyses have demonstrated that the high energy {001} facets enable efficient separation and transfer of photo-generated electron-hole pairs, and uncoordinated Ti5c atoms in the exposed {001} facets can effectively narrow the energy gap of the catalyst [17]. 3D TiO2 hollow nanoboxes were fabricated by a topotactic transformation from TiOF2 precursors [18, 19]. In terms of morphology and facet modification, building 3D hierarchical TiO2 hollow nanoboxes enclosed by six ordered TiO2 nanosheets with dominant {001} facet exposure to enhance visible light absorption, especially in the originally crystal growth process, is still a difficult problem and is restricted by the critical crystal growth environment. Thus, there is an urgent need to develop a facile and one-pot topotactic synthetic strategy to prepare Ti3+ self-doped TiO2 with 3D hollow structures to enhance the visible light response. To the best of our knowledge, the fabrication of Ti3+-doped 3D TiO2 hollow nanoboxes with exposed {001} facets in the presence of a reductant through a topotactic transformation process with a TiOF2 template has not been reported.

Herein, we employ a simple one-pot topotactic hydrothermal method to introduce Ti3+ and oxygen vacancies into 3D TiO2 hollow nanoboxes without any other impurity elements. By using low-cost zinc powder as the reductant, TiOF2 as the template, and ethanol as solution, Ti3+ is successfully self-doped into the bulk of 3D hollow nanoboxes, which are assembled by six ordered arranged TiO2 nanosheet arrays with dominantly exposed {001} facets. In addition, due to strong visible adsorption by Ti3+ and oxygen vacancies, and charge recombination suppression, the RhB photodegradation activities were significantly enhanced under visible light irradiation.

2 Experimental
2.1 Topotactic synthesis process

TiOF2 precursor was first prepared as a nanocubic template [20]. In a typical procedure, 5 mL HF was slowly added dropwise into 30 mL CH3COOH under magnetic stirring. After stirring for 30 min, the mixed solution was added to a polyvinyl fluoride beaker containing 15 g tetrabutyl titanate (TBT). A white emulsion was obtained, which was then transferred to a dried 100-mL Teflon-lined autoclave and kept at 200 ℃ for 12 h. After being allowed to cool to 25 ℃, the product was washed several times with ethanol and distilled water. The washed product was dried at 100 ℃ for 4 h to obtain a white TiOF2 precursor.

Using TiOF2 as the precursor, ethanol as a solvent, and zinc powder as a reducing agent, Ti3+ self-doped 3D hierarchical titanium dioxide hollow nanoboxes were prepared via a template-engaged in-situ topotactic transformation process. Typically, 1.0 g TiOF2 and 0.05 g Zn were ground and added to 20 mL ethanol. Then the mixture was transferred to a Teflon-lined autoclave and kept in an oven at 200 ℃ for 24 h. After cooling, the powder was collected and washed with hydrochloric acid (38 wt%) under magnetic stirring to removal excess Zn. The washed powder was centrifuged and washed with distilled water until the pH ≈ 7. The centrifuged powder was dried overnight in a vacuum. The obtained product was marked as R0.05, where 0.05 indicates the Zn/TiOF2 mass ratio. For comparison, different samples were also synthesized under identical conditions with various amounts of zinc. These samples are labeled R0, R0.2, R0.25, R0.3 and R0.4 [21-24].

2.2 Characterization

X-ray diffraction (XRD) measurements from the prepared powder were gathered using Cu Kα radiation at a 2θ scan rate of 0.02°/s with a D8-advance X-ray diffractometer (Bruker, Germany). The phase structure and crystal facets of the product were determined with a Tecnai G220 transmission electron microscope (TEM) (USA) operated at 200 kV acceleration voltage. Scanning electron microscope (SEM) images were gathered with a field emission scanning electron microscope (Hitachi, Japan). UV-vis diffuse reflectance spectroscopy (DRS) measurements were gathered with a UV2600 (Shimadzu, Japan) UV-vis spectrophotometer, where BaSO4 was used as the reference sample. The infrared spectra (IR) of the samples were measured using Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy (Nexus 470 FT-IR, Shimadzu, Japan). X-ray photo-electron spectroscopy (XPS) measurements were gathered with a Kratos XSAM800 XPS system with a monochromatic Mg Kα source and a charge neutralizer. All the binding energies were referenced to the C 1s peak at 284.8 eV of the surface adventitious carbon. Photoluminescence (PL) spectra were recorded with a fluorescence spectrophotometer (F-7000, Hitachi, Japan). Electron paramagnetic resonance (EPR) spectra were collected at room temperature with an EMX-8/2.7EPR spectrometer (Bruker, Germany).

2.3 Photocatalytic properties

A coumarin probe molecule PL technique was used to evaluate the photocatalytic activity of the samples. Coumarin readily reacted with ·OH free radicals to produce highly fluorescent 7-hydroxycoumarin [25, 26]. Typically, coumarin (0.5 mmol/L) was mixed with TiO2 (1.0 g/L) under magnetic stirring, and the suspension was shaken for 24 h. A 150 W Xe lamp (Perkin-Elmer Co.), equipped with an ultraviolet cutoff filter, served as the visible light source. At given intervals, small samples were withdrawn and filtered through a membrane with a syringe. The photoluminescence spectra of the filtrate were obtained with a fluorescence spectrophotometer with 330 nm excitation wavelength.

Photocatalytic degradation of Rhodamine B (RhB) was performed out in a laboratory scale photoreactor at atmospheric pressure. About 50 mg of anatase Ti3+ self-doped 3D hollow nanoboxes (a concentration of 1 g/L) were added into an RhB solution (50 mL) with the initial concentration of 1.0 × 10–4 mol/L in a cylindrical Pyrex flask (50 mL). The Ti3+/RhB solution was first sonicated for 5 min and continuously stirred in darkness for 30 min. The photoreaction solution was illuminated with the high pressure Xe lamp while stirring. UV-vis absorption spectra were recorded at successive intervals to monitor the photocatalytic reaction.

3 Results and discussion
3.1 Crystal planes and morphology

The crystal planes and morphology of the catalysts are major determinants of their photocatalytic properties. XRD spectra of the TiO2 and Ti3+ self-doped samples are shown in Fig. 1. For all TiO2 samples, a broad peak at 2θ = 25.37° was observed, corresponding to the {101} plane of anatase TiO2 (JCPDS No. 21-1272). The peak at 24.05° is attributed to the diffraction peak of TiOF2 and implies that all samples successfully completed the topotactic transformation process with the TiOF2 template. No rutile patterns were formed in the as-prepared samples due to the presence of F- ions as shape control agents [27, 28]. As shown in Fig. 1, the peaks observed at 2θ = 25.37°, 37.98°, 48.05°, 54.05°, and 55.08° correspond to diffraction from the {101}, {004}, {200}, {105), and {211} crystal planes, respectively. These peaks are characteristic of anatase TiO2. Compared with the undoped Ti3+ sample, diffraction peaks from the {004} and {105} crystal planes become sharper, while other crystal face diffraction peaks show little change. This can be ascribed an increased zinc concentration, leading to Ti3+ and Ov concentration increases. Each dopant may affect the {105} and {004} crystal faces differently. {105} crystal faces become more crystalline, whereas {004} crystal faces show lower crystallinity. In addition, the particle sizes (~260 nm) in various samples show little change. Meanwhile, the d space value remains constant, implying the reduced TiO2 unit cell dimension is unlikely to change during the Ti3+ self-doping process.

Fig. 1. XRD patterns of Ti3+ self-doped TiO2 samples with different Zn/TiOF2 mass ratios, together with the expected diffraction peaks for standard TiOF2 and anatase TiO2 (S-TiOF2, A-TiO2)

The crystallite sizes for the {101} diffraction peak listed in Table 1 were determined from Scherrer equation: D = Kλ/(βcosθ). K = 0.89 is a shape factor, β is the full-width half-maximum of the diffraction peak, λ represents the wavelength of XRD (Cu Kα = 0.15418 nm), and θ is the XRD angle.

Table 1
Structural analysis of various samples

The morphology of the Ti3+ self-doped TiO2 samples was examined using TEM, and the results are shown in Fig. 2. The insets in Fig. 2 show color photographs of the powdered samples. Fig. 2(a) shows a TEM image of pure TiO2 (R0). The samples has a smooth surface, and hollow nanoboxes assembled from nanosheets are clearly visible. One can see in Fig. 2 (b)(e) that the Ti3+ self-doped TiO2 samples have well-defined box-shaped morphology, which is consistent with the cubic TiOF2 template. With an increased amount of zinc powder, Ti3+ species were produced form Ti4+, but the sample morphology shows little change. The high resolution TEM image of sample R0.4 is shown in Fig. 2 (f1) with hollow nanoboxes erected on the Cu grid. The lattice spacing is about 0.235 nm, which agrees well with the {001} crystallite facet of anatase titanium dioxide. The top and bottom facets of the hollow boxes are also shown to be the {001} planes. In contrast with previously reported TiO2 hollow structures, the as-prepared TiO2 nanoboxes are hierarchical hollow nanoboxes consisting of six nanosheets with {001} facets. Ti3+ self-doping causes the number of Ti–O bonds to decrease, which increases the number of oxygen vacancies in the bulk of the nanoboxes rather than in the surface. It is exciting to find that the presence of zinc powder has a negligible effect on the morphology of 3D TiO2 hollow nanoboxes. The surface adsorbed ZnO clusters disappear after acid treatment, which are usually thought to be responsible for the stability of the reduced TiO2. The color of the as-prepared samples turned from pure white to dark blue, and the blue coloration became much darker with an increased amount of zinc (inset of Fig. 2). The blue coloration of the Ti3+ self-doped TiO2 samples is attributed to an increased concentration of Ti3+ or Ov obtained from reduction of Ti4+ by the zinc powder, which is consistent with results reported in the literature [29].

Fig. 2. TEM images and optical images (inset) of the as-prepared: R0 (a), R0.05 (b), R0.2 (c), R0.25 (d), R0.3 (e), and R0.4 (f). (f1) shows a high resolution TEM image of the R0.4 sample

Fig. 3 shows SEM images of the Ti3+-doped TiO2 samples. The images in Fig. 3(a)(e) show uniformly shaped hollow boxes whose structures originate from the TiOF2 nanocube template. The boxes are enclosed by six well-arranged TiO2 nanosheets with many sheets stacked.

Fig. 3. SEM images of Ti3+ self-doped TiO2 samples. (a) R0, (b) R0.05, (c) R0.2, (d) R0.25, (e) R0.3, (f) R0.4

EDS images of the R0.25 catalysts are shown in Fig. 4. The four panels on the left are elemental face-scans of the inset image. The presence of Ti and O is obvious, as indicated by red dots and green dots, respectively. The right picture shows spot-scan elemental content in the red-marked area, which was found to contain Ti and O. As shown in Table 2, the atomic concentration of Ti and O in the R0.25 sample can reach 34.13% and 65.87%, respectively. This is consistent with atomic ratio of TiO2.

Fig. 4. The face-scan and spot-scan SEM images and EDS analysis of the R0.25 sample
Table 2
The EDS spot-scan data of the R0.25 sample

A probable formation mechanism of Ti3+ self-doped 3D TiO2 hollow nanoboxes has been proposed via a topological transformation process involving template participation, as shown in Fig. 5. Ethanol is used as a solvent to provide mild reaction conditions. TiOF2 cube templates will transform into TiO2 during a solvothermal reaction by in situ transformation of TiOF2 to anatase TiO2 nanocrystals (Eqs. (1) and (2)). It has been reported that fluoride ions facilitate the formation of high-energy anatase TiO2 nanosheets because the adsorption of F- on the surface of TiO2 nanocrystals can sharply reduce the surface energy of the {001} facets. Therefore, it is understandable that precursor TiOF2 can transform into anatase 3D TiO2 hollow nanoboxes in situ assembled from TiO2 nanosheets with exposed high-energy {001} facets. Zn powder acts as reductant. It has been found that Zn can affect the morphology of TiO2, and the surface-adsorbed ZnO clusters are thought to be responsible for the stability of the Ti3+-doped TiO2 (Eq. (3)). In the reducing atmosphere, Ti3+ can be easily obtained via reduction of Ti4+ along with generation of Ov sites, which will produce donor states just below the conduction band [20, 21].

(1)
(2)
(3)
Fig. 5. The probable formation process of Ti3+ self-doped 3D TiO2 hollow nanoboxes
3.2 UV-vis, FT-IR, EPR and XPS results

As showed in Fig. 6(a), UV-vis diffuse reflectance spectra were used to measure the optical properties of the obtained Ti3+ self-doped TiO2 hollow nanoboxes. The undoped TiO2 sample (R0) shows no absorption above its fundamental absorption edge, while the reduced TiO2 samples display broad visible light absorbance after Ti3+ self-doping, and the absorption intensities of all Ti3+ self-doped TiO2 samples is gradually enhanced as zinc concentration increases. It is widely accepted that the Ti3+-doped modification and the presence of oxygen vacancies can induce the formation of color centers, which results in enhanced visible light absorption. To further investigate the band gap in each sample, the energy gap (eV) threshold was obtained using the transversal method, and the graph of the transformed Kubelka-Munk function against the photon energy for samples R0 and R0.25 are displayed in Fig. 6(b). According to the transformed Kubelka-Munk function plot, the energy gaps of Eg(R0) and Eg(R0.25) are 3.02 and 2.94 eV, respectively. The reduced bandgap arises because Ti3+ can form a local energy state between the valence and conduction bands as Ti3+ concentration increases, which reduce the forbidden band width and the electron transition energy. In addition, the color of the as-prepared samples shifts gradually form white to dark blue, and the blue coloration indicates strong visible light absorption in the Ti3+ self-doped samples. Meanwhile, we find that the Ti3+ self-doped samples also exhibit very strong UV absorption, which indicates Ti3+ self-doping not only enhances the visible light response of the catalysts, but also improves their UV light absorption. Thus, it can be predicted that more photo-generated electrons and holes can be excited and can participate in photocatalytic reactions, which is attributed to the increased probabilities of activation by UV and visible light.

Fig. 6. (a) UV-vis diffuse reflectance spectra of Ti3+ self-doped TiO2 samples. (b) Plot of transformed Kubelka-Munk function versus photon energy for the R0 and R0.25 samples

FT-IR spectra of the Ti3+ self-doped samples were gathered to further verify the presence of Ti3+ and oxygen vacancies, as shown in Fig. 7(a). The stretching and bending vibrations due to absorption by H2O and the Ti–OH group on the sample surface are found near 3447 and 1629 cm–1, respectively. The stretching vibration of Ti–O–Ti is observed at 1380 cm–1, and the Ti–O bond stretching vibration is observed from 547 to 524 cm–1. This peak is shifted 23 cm–1 to longer wavelengths, and the shift can be attributed to the formation of Ti3+ and oxygen vacancies. This can be explained based on formation of Ti3+ due to reduction of Ti4+. The increased number of oxygen vacancies (Ov) in the lattice structure changes the number of Ti atom surrounding ab O atom, and the election cloud density around a Ti atom decreased. This causes the stretching vibration absorption peak of a Ti–O bond to shift. This demonstrates that Ti3+ self-doping introduces more Ti3+ ions and Ov into the bulk of the 3D hollow nanoboxes rather than at the surface.

Fig. 7. FT-IR (a) and EPR (b) spectra of different samples

EPR spectra were also recorded to further verify the generation of Ti3+ in the R0 and R0.25 samples. As shown in Fig. 7(b), paramagnetic Ti3+ and Ov have g-values of 1.98 and 2.00 in the R0.25 sample, respectively. These values are consistent with reports that Ti3+ and Ov peaks are found at g = 1.94~1.99 and 2.004, respectively [24-30]. As we all know, the surface Ti3+ is not stable under illumination in water or air as it is easily oxidized, which shows an EPR signal at g = 2.02 corresponding to O2. Therefore, the absence of such a peak in Fig. 7(b) indicates that Ti3+ is present in the bulk rather than on the surface, which is attributed to its high stability in water or air. During hydrothermal treatment, with increasing Zn concentration, sample R0.25 shows higher Ti3+ doping concentration than sample R0.

XPS measurements were gathered to further investigate the chemical environment of Ti3+-doped TiO2. As shown in Fig. 8, the high-resolution XPS spectrum of Ti 2p for R0.25 displays two peaks at binding energies of 459.01 eV (Ti 2p3/2) and 464.85 eV (Ti 2p1/2). The Ti 2p binding energy peaks can be divided into four peaks at 458.63 eV (Ti3+ 2p3/2), 463.88 eV (Ti3+ 2p1/2), 459.19 eV (Ti4+ 2p3/2), and 464.89 eV (Ti4+ 2p1/2). It should be emphasized that there are no zinc binding energy peaks in high resolution XPS spectrum. These peaks may be absent from the XPS spectra if the surface-adsorbed zinc clusters can be completely removed from the surface of Ti3+-doping TiO2 after acid treatment. The O 1s peaks at 529.87 and 530.16 eV are ascribed to the Ti–O bond and Ov adjacent to Ti3+, respectively. From Table 3, it can be found that Ti3+-doping in sample R0.25 increases the electron binding energy of Ti and O by about 0.30 and 0.29 eV respectively, compared with sample R0. It is well accepted that the presence of Ti3+ and Ov can suppress recombination of photo-generated electron-hole pairs, improve the formation rate of photo-induced hydroxyl radicals, and enhance the visible light response.

Fig. 8. The XPS spectra of the R0.25 sample
Table 3
Electron binding energy of R0 and R0.25 samples
3.3 Visible-light photocatalytic performance

Visible-light photocatalytic activities of the as-prepared samples were investigated by RhB degradation to explore the effect of Ti3+ self-doping. It can be seen from Fig. 9(a) that self-degradation of RhB can be negligible, and the visible-light degradation activities of the Ti3+ self-doped TiO2 samples indicates much higher photocatalytic efficiencies than undoped TiO2 (R0) under visible light irradiation (λ ≥ 420 nm). This effect depends on the concentration of RhB versus visible light irradiation time. The R0.25 sample shows the highest photocatalytic activity with an RhB degradation rate of 96% after 2 h of visible light irradiation, resulting from its higher concentration of Ti3+ and Ov. However, pure TiO2 (R0) shows a low decomposition rate of RhB under the same reaction conditions. It can be demonstrated that the photodegradation rate of Ti3+ self-doped TiO2 is proportional to the doped Ti3+ concentration in the bulk of hollow nanoboxes, which is dependent on visible absorption (Fig. 9(a)). The experimental result indicates that Ti3+ self-doping is an effective method to enhance the visible photocatalytic activity of TiO2 hollow nanoboxes for degradation of organic pollutants. It is generally accepted that the slopes of the RhB intensity curves versus illumination time (rate constant) represent the photocatalytic activity of the samples. By comparing the rate constants of the photocatalysts (Fig. 9(b)), we can see that the rate constants of the samples first increase and then decrease as the zinc powder/TiOF2 mass ratio increases. As observed from the histogram of rate constants in Fig. 9(b), we find that the R0.25 sample reveals the highest visible-light photocatalytic activity (rate constant of 0.02394). This value is 4.0 times higher than the rate constant for undoped TiO2 (R0) (rate constant of 0.00596).

Fig. 9. (a) Dependence of the RhB concentration on visible light irradiation time. (b) Comparison of the rate constants

To further evaluate the visible-light photocatalytic activity of the samples, coumarin is used as a probe molecule to explore the production rate of hydroxyl free radicals (·OH is the most important active species in the photocatalytic reaction) from the Ti3+ self-doped TiO2 samples under the visible light irradiation [30, 31]. Fig. 10(a) records typical photoluminescence spectral changes in the R0.25 sample over different illumination times. One can see that the photoluminescence intensity of the photo-induced fluorescent 7-hydroxycoumarin at 450 nm increases as the irradiation time increases when the samples are excited at 330 nm. The ·OH production rate constants (the slope of the PL intensity vs illumination time curve) for the Ti3+ self-doped TiO2 samples are shown in Fig. 10(b), which represents the photocatalytic activity of the samples. It can be seen that the rate constant of the catalyst first increases and then decreases as the Zn/TiOF2 mass ratio increases. The R0.25 sample exhibits the highest photodegradation activity and is much better than the undoped TiO2 catalyst (R0), which is consistent with RhB photodegradation measurements. Fig. 10(c) shows typical active species super oxygen free radical (O2) photoluminescence spectra from sample R0.25, which indicates that the emission wavelength is 550 nm. The fluorescence intensity and the O2 constantly increased with increasing illumination time, which implies that sample R0.25 under visible light irradiation produces O2.

Fig. 10. (a) PL spectral changes observed during illumination of the R0.25 sample. (b) ·OH production rate constants for different samples. (c) Fluorescence detection of superoxide free radical (O2) in the R0.25 sample

In order to further investigate the stability of Ti3+ self-doped TiO2 catalysts, the R0.25 catalyst, which displays the highest rate constant, was recycled five times after bleaching the RhB under visible irradiation. One can see that the photodegradation rate of RhB reduces, but remains at 81% after 5 cycles, as shown in Fig. 11. Thus, the photocatalytic stability is acceptable under visible light irradiation, indicating there are very few Ti3+ ions on the surface of the TiO2 sample. These ions are unstable and can be oxidized to Ti4+. In comparison, the high stability of our catalyst demonstrated the vast majority of Ti3+ and Ov were introduced into the lattice of the 3D hollow nanoboxes rather than at the surface.

Fig. 11. Cycling degradation of RhB over the R0.25 sample under visible light irradiation
3.4 Reasons for enhancement of the visible light response

According to a previous report, doped TiO2 powders can form two phases [32]. Generally, two phases for the same semiconductor composite have great benefits in suppressing recombination of photo-induced holes and electrons pairs, which enhances the photocatalytic properties [33-35]. We use PL measurements to evaluate whether recombination of photo-generated electron-hole pairs on the surface of Ti3+ self-doped TiO2 was effectively inhibited after Ti3+ doping. Herein, PL analyses for the un-doped (R0) and Ti3+ self-doped TiO2 samples (R0.05, R0.2, R0.25, and R0.3) were conducted. As shown in Fig. 12, we find the shape of the emission spectra are very similar for all samples, and all spectra consist of four primary peaks. The highest intensity peak at ~387 nm is attributed to the radiative transition, while the other three weaker peaks, ranging from 440 to 520 nm, are ascribed to surface oxygen vacancies [36]. The photoluminescence intensity for sample R0.25 is lower than that for the undoped Ti3+ (R0) sample. This result in turn confirms the strong interaction present in the R0.25 sample due to suppression of the radiative recombination process. Therefore, it is reasonable to predict that the Ti3+ self-doped R0.25 sample would exhibit superior photodegradation activity than undoped TiO2 (R0).

Fig. 12. PL spectra for different samples
3.5 Photocatalytic mechanism

Considering the superior photocatalytic activity of Ti3+ self-doped TiO2 hollow nanoboxes, we propose the possible mechanism shown in Fig. 13. Generally, the TiO2-based catalytic reaction generated electron-hole pairs (e-h+) during illumination. In contrast, for the Ti3+ self-doped TiO2 catalyst, the bandgap reduction in the Ti3+ self-doped TiO2 catalyst greatly reduces the excitation power and enhances the visible light response. Meanwhile, the Ti3+-doping states can trap photo-induced electrons and transfer them to oxygen adsorbed on the surface of the catalyst. Thus, the existence of a certain number of Ti3+ states can decrease the recombination rate of photo-generated electron-hole pairs and promote photocatalytic activity. If the concentration of Ti3+ is too high (e.g., as in R0.3 and R0.4), the recombination rate of photo-induced charges will increase, resulting in a decreased distance between the Ti3+ trapping states and Ti3+ dopants [37, 38].

Fig. 13. Possible photocatalytic mechanism of Ti3+ self-doped TiO2
4 Conclusions

In summary, we have proposed a simple topotactic method for preparing Ti3+ self-doped 3D TiO2 hollow nanoboxes with dominant high energy {001} facets using a one-pot hydrothermal reduction method in the presence of zinc powder and TiOF2. The presence of Ti3+ species has little effect on the morphology, which keeps the hollow nanoboxes originating from the TiOF2 template. The Ti3+ self-doped TiO2 sample with Zn/TiOF2 mass ratio of 0.25 shows the highest rate of RhB photodegradation (96%) after 2 h of visible light irradiation. This value is 4.0 times than that of pure TiO2 hollow nanoboxes due to the introduction of Ti3+ and Ov, which enhanced visible light photocatalytic activity. The present study provides a simple approach for designing high efficiency visible-light-responsive Ti3+ self-doped TiO2 photocatalysts with 3D hierarchical hollow structures.

References
[1]
J. R. Ran, J. Zhang, J. G. Yu, M. Jaroniec, S. Z. Qiao, Chem. Soc. Rev., 2015, 46: 7789-7812.
[2]
L. Pan, J. J. Zou, S. B. Wang, Z. F. Huang, A. Yu, L. Wang, X. W. Zhan, App. Sur. Sci., 2013, 268: 252-258. DOI:10.1016/j.apsusc.2012.12.074
[3]
H. G. Yang, C. H. Sun, S. Z. Qiao, J. Zou, G. Liu, S. C. Smith, H. M. Cheng, G. Q. Lu, Nature, 2008, 453: 638-641. DOI:10.1038/nature06964
[4]
K. L. Lv, J. G. Yu, L. Z. Cui, S. L. Chen, M. Li, Alloys Compd., 2011, 509: 4557-4562. DOI:10.1016/j.jallcom.2011.01.103
[5]
K. L. Lv, Q. J. Xiang, J. G. Yu, Appl. Catal, B, 2011, 104: 275-281. DOI:10.1016/j.apcatb.2011.03.019
[6]
X. Chen, S. S. Mao, Chem. Rev., 2007, 38: 2891-2959.
[7]
H. Zeng, J. Xie, H. Xie, B. L. Su, M. Wang, H. Ping, W. Wang, H. Wang, Z. Fu, Mater. Chem. A, 2015, 3: 19588-19596. DOI:10.1039/C5TA04649A
[8]
W. Li, L. Yan, X. Liu, H. Li, W. Li, F. Zha, Z. Lei, J. Mater. Chem. A, 2015, 3: 14696-14702. DOI:10.1039/C5TA02870A
[9]
Z. H. Li, Y. L. Zhu, F. X. Pang, H. Y. Liu, X. G. Gao, W. Ou, J. W. Liu, X. Wang, X. D. Cheng, Y. F. Zhang, Ceram Int., 2015, 41: 10063-10069. DOI:10.1016/j.ceramint.2015.04.099
[10]
A. J Albrbar, V. Djokic, A. Bjelajac, J. Kovac, J. Cirkovic, M. Mitric, D. Janackovic, R. Petrovic, Ceram. Int., 2016, 42: 16718-16728. DOI:10.1016/j.ceramint.2016.07.144
[11]
X. Y. Pan, M. Q. Yang, X. Z. Fu, N. Zhang, Y. J. Xu, Nanoscale, 2013, 5: 3601-3614. DOI:10.1039/c3nr00476g
[12]
D. C. Cronemeyer, Phys. Rev., 1959, 113: 1222-1226. DOI:10.1103/PhysRev.113.1222
[13]
F. Zuo, K. Bozhilov, R. J. Dillon, L. Wang, P. Smith, X. Zhao, C. Bardeen, P. Feng, Angew. Chem. Int, Ed., 2012, 51: 6223-6226. DOI:10.1002/anie.201202191
[14]
L. L. Si, Z. A. Huang, K. L. Lv, D. G. Tang, C. J. Yang, J. Alloy Compd., 2014, 601: 88-93. DOI:10.1016/j.jallcom.2014.02.141
[15]
H. G. Yang, C. H. Sun, S. Z. Qiao, J. Zou, G. Liu, S. C. Smith, H. M. Cheng, G. Q. Lu, Nature, 2008, 453: 638-641. DOI:10.1038/nature06964
[16]
G. Liu, J. C. Yu, G. Q. Lu, H. M. Cheng, Chem. Commun., 2011, 47: 6763-6783. DOI:10.1039/c1cc10665a
[17]
J. Pan, G. Liu, G. Q. M. Lu, H. M. Cheng, Angew. Chem. Int. Ed., 2011, 50: 2133-2137. DOI:10.1002/anie.v50.9
[18]
Z. Y. Wang, B. B. Huang, Y. Dai, X. Y. Zhang, X. Y. Qin, Z. Li, Z. K. Zheng, H. F. Cheng, L. W. Guo, CrystEngComm, 2012, 14: 4578-4581. DOI:10.1039/c2ce25271f
[19]
Z. Y. Wang, B. B. Huang, Y. Dai, X. L. Zhu, Y. Y. Liu, X. Y. Zhang, X. Y. Qin, CrystEngComm, 2013, 15: 3436-3441. DOI:10.1039/c3ce00041a
[20]
Z. A. Huang, Z. Y Wang, K. L. Lv, Y. Zhang, K. J. Deng, ACS. Appl. Mater. Interfaces, 2013, 5: 8663-8669. DOI:10.1021/am4023048
[21]
W. Z. Fang, M. Y. Xing, J. L. Zhang, J. Photochem. Photobiol. C, 2017, 32: 21-39. DOI:10.1016/j.jphotochemrev.2017.05.003
[22]
W. Z. Fang, F. Dappozze, C. Guillard, Y. Zhou, M. Y. Xing, S. Mishra, S. Daniele, J. L. Zhang, J. Phys. Chem. C, 2017, 121: 17068-17076. DOI:10.1021/acs.jpcc.7b03724
[23]
W. Iqbal, L. Z. Wang, X. J. Tan, J. L. Zhang, J. Environ. Chem. Eng., 2017, 5: 3500-3507. DOI:10.1016/j.jece.2017.07.011
[24]
W. Z. Fang, L. Khrouz, Y. Zhou, B. Shen, C. Y. Dong, M. Y. Xing, S. Mishra, S. Daniele, J. L. Zhang, Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys., 2017, 19: 13875-13881. DOI:10.1039/C7CP01212H
[25]
Z. Y. Wang, K. L. Lv, G. H. Wang, K. J. Deng, D. G. Tang, Appl. Catal. B, 2010, 100: 378-385. DOI:10.1016/j.apcatb.2010.08.014
[26]
X. G. Han, Q. Kuang, M. S. Jin, Z. X. Xie, L. S. Zheng, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2009, 131: 3152-3153. DOI:10.1021/ja8092373
[27]
K. L. Lv, B. Cheng, J. G. Yu, G. Liu, Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys., 2012, 14: 5349-5362. DOI:10.1039/c2cp23461k
[28]
J. C. Yu, J. G. Yu, W. K. Ho, Z. T. Jiang, L. Z. Zhang, Chem. Mater., 2002, 14: 3808-3816. DOI:10.1021/cm020027c
[29]
C. Zhou, Y. Zhao, L. Shang, Y. Cao, L. Z. Wu, C. H. Yung, T. Zhang, Chem. Commun., 2014, 50: 9554-9556. DOI:10.1039/C4CC04432K
[30]
W. Z. Fang, M. Y. Xing, J. L. Zhang, Appl. Catal. B, 2014, 160-161: 240-246. DOI:10.1016/j.apcatb.2014.05.031
[31]
X. G. Han, Q. Kuang, M. S. Jin, Z. X. Xie, L. S. Zheng, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2009, 131: 3152-3153. DOI:10.1021/ja8092373
[32]
M. H. Zhou, J. G. Yu, J. Hazard. Mater., 2008, 152: 1229-1236. DOI:10.1016/j.jhazmat.2007.07.113
[33]
K. L. Lv, J. G. Yu, K. J. Deng, X. H. Li, M. Li, J. Phys. Chem. Solid., 2010, 71: 519-522. DOI:10.1016/j.jpcs.2009.12.026
[34]
Y. M. Xu, K. L. Lv, Z. G. Xiong, W. H. Leng, W. P. Du, D. Liu, X. J. Xue, J. Phys. Chem. C, 2007, 111: 19024-19032. DOI:10.1021/jp076364w
[35]
K. L. Lv, X. F. Li, K. J. Deng, J. Sun, X. H. Li, M. Li, Appl. Catal. B, 2010, 95: 383-392. DOI:10.1016/j.apcatb.2010.01.017
[36]
J. G. Yu, T. T. Ma, S. W. Liu, Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys., 2011, 13: 3491-3501. DOI:10.1039/C0CP01139H
[37]
Q. Zhu, Y. Peng, L. Lin, C. M. Fan, G. Q. Gao, R. X. Wang, A. W. Xu, Mater. Chem. A, 2014, 2: 4429-4437. DOI:10.1039/c3ta14484d
[38]
X. Liu, S. M. Gao, H. Xu, Z. Z. Lou, W. J. Wang, B. B. Huang, Y. Dai, Nanoscale, 2013, 5: 1870-1875. DOI:10.1039/c2nr33563h