催化学报  2018, Vol. 39 Issue (9): 1527-1533   PDF    
扩展功能
加入收藏夹
复制引文信息
加入引用管理器
Email Alert
RSS
本文作者相关文章
Zhifeng Liu
Xue Lu
Multifarious function layers photoanode based on g-C3N4 for photoelectrochemical water splitting
Zhifeng Liua,b, Xue Lub     
a. Hubei Collaborative Innovation Center for High-efficiency Utilization of Solar Energy, Hubei University of Technology, Wuhan 430068, Hubei, China;
b. School of Material Science and Engineering, Tianjin Chengjian University, Tianjin 300384, China
* Corresponding author. Liu Zhifeng, Tel: +86-22-23085236; Fax: +86-22-23085110; E-mail: tjulzf@163.com
Foundation item: This work was supported by the Science Funds of Tianjin for Distinguished Young Scholar (17JCJQJC44800), Natural Science Foundation of Tianjin (16JCYBJC17900), and Open Foundation of Hubei Collaborative Innovation Center for High-efficient Utilization of Solar Energy (HBSKFZD2017001)
Abstract: We report on a novel g-C3N4/TiO2/Co-Pi photoanode combining a TiO2 protection layer, Co-Pi hole capture layer, and g-C3N4 light-absorption layer layer for photoelectrochemical (PEC) water splitting to generate hydrogen for the first time. This new photoanode with three function layers exhibits enhanced PEC performance with a photocurrent density of 0.346 mA·cm-2 at 1.1 V (vs. RHE), which is approximately 3.6 times that of pure g-C3N4 photoanode. The enhanced PEC performance of g-C3N4/TiO2/Co-Pi photoanode benefits from the following:(1) excellent visible light absorption of g-C3N4; (2) stable protection of TiO2 to improve the durability of g-C3N4 film; and (3)photogenerated holes capture Co-Pi to separate photogenerated electron-hole pairs efficiently. This promising multifarious function layers structure provides a new perspective for PEC water splitting to generate hydrogen.
© 2018, Dalian Institute of Chemical Physics, Chinese Academy of Sciences.
Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
Key words: g-C3N4    TiO2    Co-Pi    Photoanode    Photoelectrochemical water splitting    
g-C3N4基多功能层光阳极在光电化学水分解中的应用
刘志锋a,b, 鲁雪b     
a. 湖北工业大学, 湖北省高效利用太阳能协同创新中心, 湖北武汉 430068;
b. 天津城建大学材料科学与工程学院, 天津 300384
摘要:光电化学分解水制氢可以一并解决环境问题和能源危机,因而成为研究热点.由于TiO2禁带宽度较大,不能有效吸收太阳光中的可见光,使光电化学分解水制氢的应用受限.g-C3N4的禁带宽度约为2.7eV,能有效吸收可见光,但g-C3N4薄膜制备研究较少.我们通过热聚缩合法直接在FTO导电玻璃上制备出g-C3N4薄膜,发现其光电化学分解水制氢稳定性不高,选择易制备的TiO2作为保护层可以提高g-C3N4的耐用性.此外,为提高g-C3N4光生电子空穴对的分离能力,依靠Co-Pi对光生空穴的捕获作用而将其覆盖在最外层.因此本文首次制备一种新型的g-C3N4/TiO2/Co-Pi光阳极用于光电化学分解水制氢,其中g-C3N4用作光吸收层,TiO2用作保护层,Co-Pi用作空穴捕获层.并在此基础上,通过扫描电子显微镜(SEM),X射线衍射(XRD),紫外可见光谱(UV-Vis)等手段研究了g-C3N4/TiO2/Co-Pi光阳极的形貌特征和光电化学性能. SEM、EDS和XRD结果表明,g-C3N4/TiO2/Co-Pi光阳极被成功制备在了FTO导电玻璃上,厚度约为3μm.UV-Vis测试表明,g-C3N4的光吸收边约为470nm,可以有效地吸收可见光,并且g-C3N4的框架结构使光多次反射折射增加了光的捕获能力,由此可见,g-C3N4能够发挥很好的光吸收层作用.通过对g-C3N4光阳极,g-C3N4/TiO2光阳极和g-C3N4/TiO2/Co-Pi光阳极的电流电压测试发现,g-C3N4/TiO2光阳极的光电流密度小于g-C3N4光阳极,而g-C3N4/TiO2/Co-Pi光阳极的光电流密在可逆氢电极1.1V下达到了0.346mA·cm-2,约为单独g-C3N4光阳极的3.6倍.这说明Co-Pi是提升g-C3N4光电化学性能的主要因素.电化学阻抗测试结果发现,g-C3N4/TiO2/Co-Pi光阳极的界面电荷转移电阻小于g-C3N4光阳极的,这表明g-C3N4/TiO2/Co-Pi光阳极界面处载流子转移较快,同时也能促进内部光生电子空穴对的分离,整体性能的提高应该主要归因于Co-Pi对光生空穴的捕获作用.恒电压时间测试展示出g-C3N4/TiO2/Co-Pi光阳极的光电流密度在2h测试过程中没有明显下降,表明g-C3N4/TiO2/Co-Pi光阳极是相当稳定的,具有良好的耐用性,归因于TiO2和Co-Pi的共同保护作用,主要归因于TiO2层对FTO导电玻璃上的g-C3N4薄膜保护,从电化学沉积Co-Pi到所有测试结束.总体而言,g-C3N4/TiO2/Co-Pi光阳极加强的光电化学性能归因于以下几个因素:(1)g-C3N4优异的光吸收能力;(2)TiO2稳定的保护提升了g-C3N4薄膜的耐用性;(3)Co-Pi对光生空穴的捕获有效促进了光生电子空穴对的分离.
关键词g-C3N4    TiO2    Co-Pi    光阳极    光电化学水分解    

1 Introduction

Hunting for solutions to the energy crisis and environment issue, clean hydrogen fuel has been extensively explored owing to its high energy density, easy storage, and transportability [1]. Of particular note is that photoelectrochemical (PEC) water splitting to generate hydrogen is an excellent device, where solar energy acts as energy provider and a semiconductor electrode acts as catalyst to decrease overpotential for the hydrogen evolution reaction (HER) [2]. However, to achieve efficient hydrogen generation by PEC water splitting, the semiconductor electrodes need to meet following critical factors simultaneously: (1) wide light response and absorption range; (2) efficient charge separation and transportation; and (3) high durability. Beginning with the first study by Fujishima et al. [3] in 1972, TiO2 has been widely studied as an n-type semiconductor electrode for PEC water splitting. In order to fully utilize solar energy, most studies have focused on developing new visible semiconductor electrodes such as Bi2O3 [4], WO3 [5], α-Fe2O3 [6], and mpg-C3N4 [7].

Metal-free g-C3N4 composed of C and N elements has attracted increased attention owing to its improved optical properties, low cost, non-toxicity, and excellent chemical-Phys.stability [8-12]. Moreover, g-C3N4 is a medium band gap semiconductor of ~2.7 eV and an efficient photocatalyst is employed for a wide variety of reactions in water, including dye degradation and photocatalytic H2 evolution [12, 13]. Wang et al. [12] prepared bulk g-C3N4, which exhibits absorbance edge of 420 nm and photocatalytic H2 evolution rate of 0.5 μmol·h.-1 Gao et al. [13] synthesized g-C3N4 nanosheets with absorbance edge of 450 nm, which shows a certain degradation ability of methylene blue. However, there are few reports about g-C3N4 photoanodes for PEC water splitting to generate hydrogen. Based on the outstanding visible absorption and high stability of g-C3N4, we fabricated g-C3N4 film directly on fluorine-doped tin oxide (FTO) glass substrate as the photoanode for PEC water splitting to generate hydrogen [14].

The g-C3N4 film on FTO substrate was employed as the photoanode of the PEC device to generate hydrogen in water, which is easily recycled compared with dispersed g-C3N4 powder. Moreover, the durability of photoelectrodes must be also considered, especially after adding bias potential and immersing in water for a long time. Protective layers have been successfully developed to improve durability. Hu et al. [15] reviewed the protective thin layers (e.g., TiO2, ZrO2, SnO2, SiO2, etc) utilized on photoanodes for hydrogen evolution. Hou et al. [16] synthesized Co3O4 nanoparticles which were surrounded by the N-doped porous carbon (N‐PC) hybrid act as a protective layer to stabilize the Co3O4 nanoparticles, and make the Co3O4/N-PC more stable during the test. Li et al. [17] designed the Pt/TiO2/Ga2O3/Cu2O electrode (TiO2 as protective layer) which achieves a stable current for 2 h under continuous illumination of a 500-W Xe lamp. TiO2 is one of the most excellent thin protective layers owing to its low price, optical transparency, and facile preparation. However, research on the use of TiO2 thin layer to protect g-C3N4 photoanode is rare.

Unfortunately, the widespread application of g-C3N4 is limited by its inherent fast charge recombination [12]. It is noteworthy that co-catalyst loading has been attempted to suppress charge recombination and promote charge separation [18, 19]. For example, some noble metal co-catalysts like Au and Pt were employed to inhibit charge recombination and accelerate charge transportation to improve the photocatalytic hydrogen generation efficiency of g-C3N4 [20, 21]. Recently, non-noble-metal co-catalysts have been widely researched because of their excellent performance and low cost. Yu et al. [22] introduced Ni(OH)2 as a non-noble-metal co-catalyst that promotes the transportation of photogenerated electrons from g-C3N4 to Ni(OH)2 in order to improve the photocatalytic H2 generation activity of g-C3N4. Meanwhile, it was also found that the H2 production rate of 7.6 μmol·h-1 of 0.5 mol% Ni(OH)2/g-C3N4 approached that of 8.2 μmol·h-1 of 1.0 wt% Pt/g-C3N4.

Cobalt-phosphate (Co-Pi) is a non-noble-metal co-catalyst that has become increasingly important because of its availability, ion permeability, and self-repair; thus, it can be self-assembled as an amorphous film on the surface of various material by a photoelectric deposition method [23, 24]. More importantly, Co-Pi can decrease overpotential of water splitting, increase semiconductor band bending near the semiconductor/liquid junction, capture and extend lifetimes for photogenerated holes, suppress photogenerated electron-hole pair recombination, and promote or induce onset potential negative shift [23-26]. Tong et al. [27] fabricated TiO2/BiVO4/Co-Pi nanorod arrays on the FTO substrate as photoanode for PEC water splitting. Their electrochemical impedance spectroscopy results show that Co-Pi can promote charge transfer and separation by greatly decreasing the charge transfer resistance at the TiO2/BiVO4/Co-Pi and electrolyte interface. However, systematic studies of both the protective layer and hole capture layer on the g-C3N4 photoanode remain few.

Here, we report a novel g-C3N4/TiO2/Co-Pi photoanode with multifarious function layers for PEC water splitting to generate hydrogen. The g-C3N4 film as light-absorption layer layer is directly synthesized on the FTO substrate by a thermal vapor liquid-polymerization method. The TiO2 film as protective layer is covered on the g-C3N4 film to improve the durability of g-C3N4. The Co-Pi as hole capture layer is employed to promote photogenerated electron-hole pair separation. The g-C3N4/TiO2/Co-Pi photoanode exhibits enhanced PEC performance with increased photocurrent density of 0.346 mA∙cm-2 at 1.1 V (vs. RHE), and shows quite good durability.

2 Experimental
2.1 The preparation of g-C3N4 film

The g-C3N4 film was directly grown on the FTO substrate by a thermal vapor liquid-polymerization method. Thiourea was chosen as a precursor of g-C3N4 because of its low price. Thiourea particles were ground into fine powder. Next, 7 g of thiourea powder were transferred into a small ceramic ark, and then the FTO substrate with the conductive surface faced downward covered the ceramic ark. Subsequently, these were put in a muffle furnace and heated to 500 ˚C for 1 h. After cooling down to room temperature, the g-C3N4 film on the FTO substrate was acquired.

2.2 The preparation of TiO2 thin layer

The TiO2 thin layer was prepared on the surface of g-C3N4 film by a dip-coating method. Firstly, TiO2 sol was prepared. In a typical synthesis process, 10 mL of titanium butoxide was added to 40 mL ethanol and subjected to magnetic stirring for 15 min. Diethanolamine was slowly added and stirred for 2 h. Subsequently, water and ethanol were added and stirred for another 2 h. After seven days, TiO2 sol was coated on the surface of the g-C3N4 film by a dip-coating method. Finally, the g-C3N4/TiO2 film was heated in a muffle furnace at 500 ˚C for 1 h to ensure that TiO2 was well crystallized.

2.3 The preparation of Co-Pi layer

The Co-Pi layer was synthesized directly on the surface of the g-C3N4/TiO2 film using an electrochemical workstation (LK2005A) and Xe lamp (CHF-XM500, 100 mW∙cm-2) by a photoelectric deposition method. A three-electrode system was utilized, consisting of the g-C3N4/TiO2 film on the FTO substrate as the working electrode, Ag/AgCl as the reference electrode, and Pt foil as the counter electrode. Then, 0.4 V vs. Ag/AgCl was Appl. in a solution (pH = 7) containing 0.5 mmol·L-1 cobalt nitrate and 0.1 mol·L-1 potassium phosphate. The thickness of Co-Pi was controlled by the deposition time, which ranged between 10 and 60 s. The Co-Pi layer was deposited on the g-C3N4/TiO2 film and then washed with deionized water. The g-C3N4/TiO2/Co-Pi film was obtained after drying in an air oven.

2.4 Characterization

The morphology and structure of as-prepared samples were analyzed by a JEOL JSM-7800F scanning electron microscope (SEM). The energy dispersive X-ray spectroscopy (EDS) characterization of as-prepared samples was carried out under SEM observation. The crystal structure of as-prepared samples was identified by Rigaku D/max-2500 X-ray diffraction (XRD) with Cu Kα radiation (λ = 0.154059 nm). The optical absorption capability of as-prepared samples was investigated by DU-8B UV-Vis double-beam spectrophotometer using the FTO substructure as reference. All as-prepared samples were used as photoanodes in the PEC device, and their PEC performance was investigated in 0.1 mol·L-1 Na2SO4 aqueous solution by an electrochemical workstation (LK2005A) and Xe lamp (CHF-XM500, 100 mW∙cm-2) with global AM 1.5 G. A Pt foil and saturated Ag/AgCl were used as the counter electrode and reference electrode, respectively. The pH value was tested based on 0.1 mol·L-1 Na2SO4, which is approximately 7.1. The Ag/AgCl potential was converted to the reversible hydrogen electrode (RHE) according to the Nernst equation as follows:

The incident photon-to-current conversion efficiency (IPCE) plots are recorded in the range 300-900 nm at 1.1 V (vs. RHE) under AM 1.5 G illumination. The electrochemical impedance spectroscopy (EIS) measurements were performed by an electrochemical workstation under the illumination of a Xe lamp (100 mW∙cm-2). The potential value of the EIS data is 1.1 V (vs. RHE).

3 Results and discussion

The schematic illustration of the synthesis of g-C3N4/TiO2/Co-Pi film is displayed in Fig. 1. In Step 1, thiourea particles were ground into powder and transferred to a ceramic ark, which was covered by the FTO substrate with the conductive surface facing downward. The g-C3N4 film on the FTO substrate was acquired after heating in a muffle furnace at 500 ˚C for 1 h. In Step 2, the TiO2 thin layer was prepared on the surface of the g-C3N4 film by a dip-coat method. In Step 3, the Co-Pi thin layer was photoelectrically deposited on the surface of the g-C3N4/TiO2 film at 0.4 V vs. Ag/AgCl in a solution (pH = 7) containing 0.5 mmol·L-1 cobalt nitrate and 0.1 mol·L-1 potassium phosphate for a time. Finally, as-prepared g-C3N4/TiO2/Co-Pi film was obtained.

Fig. 1. Diagram of the synthesis of g-C3N4/TiO2/Co-Pi film.

As shown by the top-view SEM image in Fig. 2(a), the surface of as-prepared g-C3N4 film has plenty of irregular pores with different sizes in contact with each other to form a framework structure, which provides a higher surface area to promote the PEC reaction because the area of a curved surface is larger than that of a plane surface in the same space. The relevant cross-section SEM image is displayed in Fig. 2(b). It can be observed that the film thickness of as-prepared g-C3N4 is approximately 2 µm, which indicates that as-prepared g-C3N4 film is well grown on the FTO substrate.

Fig. 2. Top-view (a), cross-section (b) SEM images, XRD pattern (c), and UV-Vis absorptance spectrum (d) of g-C3N4 film.

The XRD pattern is presented in Fig. 2(c). Two obvious diffraction peaks, a weak peak at approximately 13.1° and a strong peak at approximately 27.4°, can be indexed to the (100) facet and (002) facet of g-C3N4, respectively, in accordance with the reports of previous literature about g-C3N4 [11-13]. Other diffraction peaks belong to the FTO substrate (JCPDS Card No. 46-1088). Therefore, g-C3N4 film on the FTO substructure has been obtained successfully.

The UV-Vis absorption spectra in the wavelength range of 300-900 nm is presented in Fig. 2(d). It can be noted that the absorption edge of the g-C3N4 film reaches 470 nm to realize outstanding absorption function within visible light range. Meanwhile, the absorptance of the g-C3N4 film is higher, which can be attributed to the improved light-harvesting ability of the framework structure owing to its increased light reflection. Subsequently, the plot of (αhν)2 of the g-C3N4 film is presented in Fig. S1. Its band gap was calculated according to the following equation [14]:

(1)

where α represents the absorptance, h represents the Planck constant, ν represents the light frequency, and A is a constant, when n is 2 or 1/2 for the direct or indirect band gap, respectively. The band gap of the g-C3N4 film is ~2.6 eV. As expected, its band gap is applicable for visible light absorption. Thus, the g-C3N4 film can be a light-absorption layer layer to harvest and absorb visible light.

The top-view SEM image of as-prepared g-C3N4/TiO2/Co-Pi film is shown in Fig. 3(a). It can be noted that the surface of film is evenly covered by plenty of particles, which should be Co-Pi according to the preparation process. As can be seen from the inset of Fig. 3(a), these Co-Pi particles are approximately 100 nm, and are distributed and aggregated randomly on the surface of film. The corresponding cross-section SEM image of as-prepared g-C3N4/TiO2/Co-Pi film is presented in Fig. 3(b). The as-prepared g-C3N4/TiO2/Co-Pi film is ~3 μm in height on average, which is 1 μm higher than that of pure g-C3N4 film. The XRD pattern of as-prepared g-C3N4/TiO2/Co-Pi film is displayed in Fig. 3(c). The strongest diffraction peak at approximately 27.4° is the characteristic peak of g-C3N4 corresponding to the (002) facet. The diffraction peak of g-C3N4 at approximately 13.1° disappears, which can be attributed to the second heating. Other peaks marked with "●" are consistent with the diffraction peaks of FTO substrate matched with JCPDS Card No. 46-1088. Apart from the peaks of the FTO and g-C3N4, of particular interest is some diffraction peaks at 2θ ≈ 31.5°, 33.6°, 55.1°, 61.3°, and 65.7°, which correspond to (002), (221), (411), (420), and (004) facets of hexagonal TiO2 (JCPDS Card No. 33-1381), respectively. Other diffraction peaks at approximately 30.0°, 37.8°, 43.6° and 44.6°, which correspond to (401), (401), (003), and (511) facets of monoclinic TiO2 (JCPDS Card No. 33-1381), respectively. The obtained TiO2 belongs to two different crystal systems; the specific reason why is not clear and needs further study, but it is worth noting that TiO2 is highly pure and well crystallized. There are no obvious diffraction peaks of Co-Pi because it is a kind of amorphous material.

Fig. 3. Top-view (a), and cross-section (b) SEM images, and XRD pattern (c) of g-C3N4/TiO2/Co-Pi film.

To further verify the successful synthesis of Co-Pi, EDS characterization of as-prepared g-C3N4/TiO2/Co-Pi film was carried out under SEM observation. As shown in Fig. 4, the detection area of element distribution mappings was randomly selected under SEM observation. The elemental distribution mappings indicate the obvious existence of C, N, Ti, O, Co, and Pi elements in the detection area, which manifests that Co and Pi elements are distributed uniformly on the film. All SEM, XRD, and EDS analyses results prove that g-C3N4/TiO2/Co-Pi film was successfully synthesized.

Fig. 4. Element distribution mappings of g-C3N4/TiO2/Co-Pi film.

The photocurrent density-voltage (I-V) curves of g-C3N4 and g-C3N4/TiO2/Co-Pi photoanodes are shown in Fig. 5(a). It can be seen that the photocurrent density of the g-C3N4 photoanode is approximately 0.095 mA∙cm-2 at 1.1 V (vs. RHE); that of g-C3N4/TiO2/Co-Pi photoanode reaches ~0.346 mA∙cm-2, which is ~3.6 times as large as the former. This may be due to the combined effect of both the TiO2 layer and Co-Pi layer on the g-C3N4 light-absorption layer layer. In order to determine the specific reasons for increased photocurrent density, the photocurrent density of g-C3N4/TiO2 photoanode was measured under the same conditions, as shown in Fig. S2(a). What can be clearly seen is that the photocurrent density of g-C3N4/TiO2 photoanode is far away from that of the g-C3N4 photoanode and g-C3N4/TiO2/Co-Pi photoanode, which indicates that the individual TiO2 layer is not able to improve the photocurrent density of g-C3N4 photoanode, and the ameliorative PEC performance mainly relies on the Co-Pi layer. Additionally, the onset potential of g-C3N4/TiO2/Co-Pi photoanode is more negative than that of g-C3N4 photoanode, which is consistent with previous reports about Co-Pi [24, 25, 28]. The positive shift of the photocurrent onset potential is caused by the slow kinetics and/or surface recombination [24]. Thus, the negative shift of the onset potential of g-C3N4/TiO2/Co-Pi photoanode should be that Co-Pi layer could capture photogenerated holes to suppress charge recombination and promote charge transport. The actual effect of the Co-Pi layer is further studied below.

Fig. 5. (a) Photocurrent density-voltage curves and (b) photocurrent density-time curves at 1.1 V vs. RHE with a 60 s light on/off of g-C3N4 film and g-C3N4/TiO2/Co-Pi film.

To further investigate the photoresponse performance of the g-C3N4 photoanode and g-C3N4/TiO2/Co-Pi photoanode, the transient photocurrent density-time (I-t) curves were obtained at 1.1 eV (vs. RHE) under chopped light irradiation. As shown in Fig. 5(b), both the g-C3N4 photoanode and g-C3N4/TiO2/Co-Pi photoanode display good photoresponse performance according to the rapid rise/decline in photocurrent with the light on/off, which suggests that these photoanodes have a good charge transport ability [4], especially the g-C3N4/TiO2/Co-Pi photoanode. After the first stable light irradiation period, the photocurrent densities of the g-C3N4 photoanode and g-C3N4/TiO2/Co-Pi photoanode basically agreed with the values in Fig. 5(a). It can be seen that photocurrent and dark current densities of the g-C3N4 photoanode have a certain decrease along with the increase in light on/off cycles, and dark current density starts to decline at a certain value until it reaches zero. This indicates that the durability of the g-C3N4 photoanode needs to be further improved. The dark current density of the g-C3N4/TiO2/Co-Pi photoanode is always zero, and its photocurrent density has a certain decline along with increased light on/off cycles. The decrease in photocurrent density of g-C3N4/TiO2/Co-Pi photoanode is influenced by chopped light irradiation. Some photogenerated electron-hole pairs excited by the first light irradiation could recombine with those excited by the second light irradiation. The transport and separation of photogenerated electron-hole pairs is not sufficiently stable under short chopped light irradiation, which leads to the decrease in photocurrent density of g-C3N4/TiO2/Co-Pi. Therefore, the photocurrent density of g-C3N4/TiO2/Co-Pi photoanode was further measured under continuous light irradiation, as shown in Fig. S2(b). What can be clearly noted is that the photocurrent density of g-C3N4/TiO2/Co-Pi photoanode is quite stable and has no obvious decrease for 2 h. Under long light irradiation, the transport and separation of photogenerated electron-hole pairs achieve enough stability; thus, the photocurrent density of g-C3N4/TiO2/Co-Pi photoanode is quite stable. In a word, the durability of g-C3N4/TiO2/Co-Pi photoanode is higher than that of g-C3N4 photoanode, which is attributed to the protective TiO2 and Co-Pi layers, especially the TiO2 layer. The role of the TiO2 layer in protecting g-C3N4 film on the FTO substrate starts from the photoelectric deposition of Co-Pi to the PEC performance tests.

Furthermore, to illustrate the relationship between the wavelength of the incident light and photoelectrochemical activity based on g-C3N4 photoanode and g-C3N4/TiO2/Co-Pi photoanode, IPCE plots in range 300-900 nm at 1.1 V (vs. RHE) are presented in Fig. 6(a). It can be noted that the IPCE outline of the g-C3N4/TiO2/Co-Pi photoanode displays improved photon-to-current conversion activity compared to that of g-C3N4 photoanode over the visible light region, which is attributed to the effect of light absorption of g-C3N4 and the good charge transport ability of Co-Pi. The charge transfer and separation performance of g-C3N4 photoanode and g-C3N4/TiO2/Co-Pi photoanode were tested using the same electrochemical workstation. The EIS of all photoanodes is shown in Fig. 6(b). All EIS Nyquist plots of these photoanodes include semicircles. Of particular note is that the arc radius of g-C3N4/TiO2/Co-Pi photoanode is smaller than that of g-C3N4 photoanode, which implies that the charge transfer resistance of g-C3N4/TiO2/Co-Pi photoanode is less than that of g-C3N4 photoanode. Therefore, the photogenerated electron-hole pairs of g-C3N4/TiO2/Co-Pi photoanode can be transferred easily, which is attributed to the fact that the Co-Pi layer can catch or trap the photogenerated holes to promote the separation of photogenerated electron-hole pairs. The g-C3N4 layer as light-absorption layer layer can be excited to generate photogenerated electron-hole pairs under light irradiation. The photogenerated electrons reach the conduction band of g-C3N4 from its valence band, and then flow into the counter electrode through a wire. Finally, the photogenerated electrons participate in water splitting to generate hydrogen. The TiO2 layer, as the protective layer, can protect the g-C3N4 film on the FTO substrate all the time. The Co-Pi layer, as the hole capture layer, can trap the photogenerated holes and promote the separation of photogenerated electron-hole pairs to improve the PEC performance.

Fig. 6. (a) Incident photon-to-current conversion efficiency (IPCE) plots and (b) electrochemical impedance spectroscopy of g-C3N4 film and g-C3N4/TiO2/Co-Pi film.
4 Conclusions

In summary, we designed a novel photoanode with a multiple function layers structure, including a g-C3N4 light-absorption layer layer, TiO2 protective layer, and Co-Pi hole capture layer, which was Appl. in PEC water splitting to generate hydrogen. The g-C3N4/TiO2/Co-Pi photoanode presents enhanced PEC performance with photocurrent density of 0.346 mA∙cm-2 at 1.1 V (vs. RHE) owing to its outstanding visible light absorption, photogenerated electron-hole pair separation, and durability. This promising multifarious function layered structure provides a new strategy for PEC water splitting to generate hydrogen.

References
[1]
Z. H. Liu, J. Zhang, T. T. Hong, X. R. Zheng, K. Y. Guo, Z. F. Liu, Int. J. Hydrogen Energy, 2016, 41: 13359-13367. DOI:10.1016/j.ijhydene.2016.05.107
[2]
F. Conzuelo, K. Sliozberg, R. Gutkowski, S. Grutzke, M. Nebel, W. Schuhmann, Anal. Chem., 2017, 89: 1222-1228. DOI:10.1021/acs.analchem.6b03706
[3]
A. Fujishima, K. Honda. Nature, 1972, 238: 37-38. DOI:10.1038/238037a0
[4]
Q. Hao, R. T. Wang, H. J. Lu, C. A. Xie, W. H. Ao, D. M. Chen, C. Ma, W. Q. Yao, Y. F. Zhu, Appl. Catal. B, 2017, 219: 63-72. DOI:10.1016/j.apcatb.2017.07.030
[5]
J. Zhang, Z. H. Liu, Z. F. Liu, ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces, 2016, 8: 9684-9691. DOI:10.1021/acsami.6b00429
[6]
J. Wang, J. L. Waters, P. Kung, S. M. Kim, J. T. Kelly, L. E. McNamara, N. I. Hammer, B. C. Pemberton, R. H. Schmehl, A. Gupta, S. Pan, ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces, 2017, 9: 381-390. DOI:10.1021/acsami.6b11057
[7]
D. M. Chen, K. W. Wang, D. G Xiang, R. L. Zong, W. Q. Yao, Y. F. Zhu, Appl. Catal. B, 2014, 147: 554-561. DOI:10.1016/j.apcatb.2013.09.039
[8]
Q. Hao, X. X. Niu, C. S. Nie, S. M. Hao, W. Zou, J. M. Ge, D. M. Chen, W. Q. Yao. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys., 2016, 18: 31410-31418. DOI:10.1039/C6CP06122B
[9]
Q. Hao, S. M. Hao, X. X. Niu, X. Li, D. M. Chen, H. Ding, Chin. J. Catal., 2017, 38: 278-286. DOI:10.1016/S1872-2067(16)62561-5
[10]
Y. Wang, X. C Wang, M. Antonietti, Angew. Chem. Int. Ed., 2012, 51: 68-89. DOI:10.1002/anie.201101182
[11]
X. C. Wang, K. Maeda, A. Thomas, K. Takanabe, G. Xin, J. M. Carlsson, K. Domen, M. Antonietti, Nat. Mater., 2009, 8: 76-82. DOI:10.1038/nmat2317
[12]
X. F. Wang, J. J. Cheng, H. G. Yu, J. G. Yu. Dalton Trans., 2017, 46: 6417-6424. DOI:10.1039/C7DT00773F
[13]
J. T. Gao, Y. Wang, S. J. Zhou, W. Lin, Y. Kong, ChemCatChem, 2017, 9: 1708-1715. DOI:10.1002/cctc.201700492
[14]
X. Lu, Z. F. Liu, J. W. Li, J. Zhang, Z. G. Guo, Appl. Catal. B, 2017, 209: 657-662. DOI:10.1016/j.apcatb.2017.03.030
[15]
S. Hu, N. S. Lewis, J. W Ager, J. H. Yang, J. R. McKone, N. C. Strandwitz, J. Phys. Chem. C, 2015, 119: 24201-24228. DOI:10.1021/acs.jpcc.5b05976
[16]
Y. Hou, J. Y. Li, Z. H. Wen, S. M. Cui, C. Yuan, J. H. Chen, Nano Energy, 2015, 12: 1-8. DOI:10.1016/j.nanoen.2014.11.043
[17]
C. L. Li, T. Hisatomi, O. Watanabe, M. Nakabayashi, N. Shibata, K. Domen, J. J. Delaunay, Energy Environ. Sci., 2015, 8: 1493-1500. DOI:10.1039/C5EE00250H
[18]
C. M. Ding, J. Y. Shi, Z. L. Wang, C. Li, ACS Catal., 2017, 7: 675-688. DOI:10.1021/acscatal.6b03107
[19]
S. W. Cao, J. G. Yu, J. Phys.Chem. Lett., 2014, 5: 2101-2107. DOI:10.1021/jz500546b
[20]
S. J. Liang, Y. Z. Xia, S. Y. Zhu, S. Zheng, Y. H. He, J. H. Bi, M. H. Liu, L. Wu, Appl. Surf. Sci., 2015, 358: 304-312. DOI:10.1016/j.apsusc.2015.08.035
[21]
X. G. Li, W. T. Bi, L. Zhang, S. Tao, W. S. Chu, Q. Zhang, Y. Luo, C. Z. Wu, Y. Xie, Adv. Mater., 2016, 28: 2427-2431. DOI:10.1002/adma.201505281
[22]
J. G. Yu, S. H. Wang, B. Cheng, Z. Lin, F. Huang, Catal. Sci. Technol., 2013, 3: 1782-1789. DOI:10.1039/c3cy20878h
[23]
Y. K. Wei, J. Z. Su, X. K. Wan, L. J. Guo, L. Vayssieres, Nano Res., 2016, 9: 1561-1569. DOI:10.1007/s12274-016-1050-9
[24]
G. M. Carroll, D. R. Gamelin, J. Mater. Chem. A, 2016, 4: 2986-2994. DOI:10.1039/C5TA06978E
[25]
J. A. Seabold, K. S. Choi, Chem. Mater., 2011, 23: 1105-1112. DOI:10.1021/cm1019469
[26]
D. H. Nam, S. K. Kuk, H. Choe, S. Lee, J. W. Ko, E. J. Son, E. Choi, Y. H. Kimb, C. B. Park, Green Chem., 2016, 18: 5989-5993. DOI:10.1039/C6GC02110G
[27]
R. Tong, X. N. Wang, X. L. Zhou, Q. Y. Liu, H. B. Wang, X. N. Peng, X. Liu, Z. H. Zhang, H. Wang, P. D. Lund, Int. J. Hydrogen Energy, 2017, 42: 5496-5504. DOI:10.1016/j.ijhydene.2016.08.168
[28]
D. K. Zhong, M. Cornuz, K. Sivula, M. Gratzel, D. R. Gamelin, Energy Environ. Sci., 2011, 4: 1759-1764. DOI:10.1039/c1ee01034d