催化学报  2018, Vol. 39 Issue (9): 1534-1542   PDF    
扩展功能
加入收藏夹
复制引文信息
加入引用管理器
Email Alert
RSS
本文作者相关文章
Weiyi Cui
Dan Xue
Naidi Tan
Bin Zheng
Mingjun Jia
Wenxiang Zhang
Pt supported on octahedral Fe3O4 microcrystals as a catalyst for removal of formaldehyde under ambient conditions
Weiyi Cuia,b, Dan Xuec, Naidi Tana, Bin Zhengb, Mingjun Jiab, Wenxiang Zhangb     
a. Key Laboratory of Chemical Cleaner Production Technology of Jilin Province, Jilin Institute of Chemical Technology, Jilin 132022, Jilin, China;
b. Key Laboratory of Surface and Interface Chemistry of Jilin Province, College of Chemistry, Jilin University, Changchun 130021, Jilin, China;
c. School of Chemistry﹠Chemical Engineering, Xi'an Shiyou University, Xi'an 710065, Shaanxi, China
* Corresponding author. Jia Mingjun, Tel: +86-431-85155390; Fax: +86-431-85168420; E-mail: jiamj@jlu.edu.cn;
Zhang Wenxiang, Tel:+86-431-85155390;Fax:+86-431-85168420;E-mail:zhwenx@jlu.edu.cn
Foundation item: This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (20973080, 21473074)
Abstract: Several catalysts comprising Pt supported on octahedral Fe3O4 (Pt/Fe3O4) were prepared by a facile method involving co-precipitation followed by thermal treatment at different temperatures. A variety of characterization results revealed that this preparation process afforded highly crystalline octahedral Fe3O4 with a uniform distribution of Pt nanoparticles on its surface. The thermal-treatment temperature significantly influenced the redox properties of the Pt/Fe3O4 catalysts. All the Pt/Fe3O4 catalysts were found to be catalytically active and stable for the oxidation of low-concentration formaldehyde (HCHO) with oxygen. The catalyst prepared by thermal treatment at 80℃ (labelled Pt/Fe3O4-80) exhibited the highest catalytic activity, efficiently converting HCHO to CO2 and H2O under ambient temperature and moisture conditions. The excellent performance of Pt/Fe3O4-80 was mainly attributed to beneficial interactions between the Pt and Fe species that result in the formation a higher density of active interface sites (e.g., Pt-O-FeOx and Pt-OH-FeOx). The introduction of water vapor improves the catalytic activity of the Pt/Fe3O4 catalysts as it participates in a water-assisted dissociation process.
© 2018, Dalian Institute of Chemical Physics, Chinese Academy of Sciences.
Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
Key words: Octahedral Fe3O4    Pt nanoparticles    Interfacial interaction    Catalytic oxidation    Formaldehyde    
八面体四氧化三铁亚微米晶负载铂催化剂用于室温催化氧化甲醛
崔维怡a,b, 薛丹c, 谭乃迪a, 郑彬b, 贾明君b, 张文祥b     
a. 吉林化工学院化工清洁生产技术吉林省高校重点实验室, 吉林吉林 132022;
b. 吉林大学化学学院, 吉林省表面与界面化学重点实验室, 吉林长春 130021;
c. 西安石油大学化学化工学院, 陕西西安 710065
摘要:空气中低浓度甲醛的治理和消除一直备受关注.在较低的反应温度下将甲醛转化为CO2和H2O的催化氧化法具有能耗低、效率高和环境友好等优点,被认为是一种最具应用发展前景的甲醛消除技术.在各种催化剂体系中,一些铁基氧化物(Fe2O3,Fe3O4或ferrihydrite)负载的Pt催化剂表现出较为优异的催化性能,能够在室温下实现甲醛的完全氧化.越来越多的研究表明,载体材料的结构及形貌是影响贵金属催化剂性能的主要因素.因此,深入研究Pt物种在不同类型铁基氧化物表面的分散情况及界面间相互作用,对理解催化剂活性中心的性质,设计制备性能更加优异的负载型贵金属催化剂具有重要科学意义. 本文采用共沉淀法一步合成出八面体Fe3O4亚微米晶负载Pt催化剂(Pt/Fe3O4),考察了不同热处理温度对催化剂催化甲醛氧化反应性能的影响.结果表明,在80℃下热处理的催化剂(Pt/Fe3O4-80)具有很高的催化活性,在室温下甲醛的转化率可接近100%.随着催化剂热处理温度的升高,催化剂活性有所降低.此外,Pt/Fe3O4催化剂还表现出良好的稳定性,经长时间存放或连续运行后催化剂的活性基本保持不变.此外,在一定湿度范围内(RH=30%-80%),水的存在能够显著提高Pt/Fe3O4催化剂的甲醛催化氧化性能. 采用各种表征技术对Pt/Fe3O4的结构、形貌、价态及氧化还原性等物理化学性质进行了研究.结果表明:采用该合成方法能够得到粒径较为均一、具有尖晶石结构和八面体形貌的Fe3O4亚微米晶,尺寸较小的Pt纳米粒子(平均2.5 nm)均匀分布在八面体Fe3O4晶体的表面,且Fe3O4载体表面还存在一定量的羟基物种.随着热处理温度的升高,催化剂表面的Pt物种和Fe物种的价态均发生明显变化.结果证实,Pt纳米粒子与Fe3O4载体间的相互作用力会随着热处理温度的升高而发生明显变化.对于性能较为优异的Pt/Fe3O4-80催化剂,Pt纳米粒子与Fe3O4载体之间存在着强度适宜的相互作用,能够产生相对较多的Pt-O-FeOx和Pt-OH-FeOx界面活性位,从而使其能够在较低的反应温度下表现出较强的活化分子氧的能力.此外,反应体系中引入的水分子能够与氧分子在界面活性位上共同活化,形成表面活性-OH物种,从而有效促进催化剂反应性能的提升.
关键词八面体四氧化三铁    铂纳米粒子    界面作用    催化氧化    甲醛    

1 Introduction

Eliminating formaldehyde (HCHO) from indoor air is extremely important to meet stringent environmental regulations and preserve human health [1-4]. The catalytic oxidation of HCHO with oxygen at low temperature is an innovative and promising technique for this purpose owing to its high removal efficiency, low energy consumption, and lack of secondary pollution [5-8]. Among the numerous catalysts investigated for this process [9-19], those comprising Pt supported on iron-based oxides, such as Fe2O3, Fe3O4, and ferrihydrite, are extremely attractive owing to their remarkable activities in HCHO oxidation at low temperatures [17-19].

It has been previously reported that Pt/Fe2O3 catalysts prepared by the colloid deposition method exhibit much higher catalytic activities for room-temperature oxidation of HCHO than those prepared by co-precipitation or impregnation method [17, 18]. The effects of various factors on the catalytic performance of Pt/Fe2O3 catalysts have been studied, and the existence of beneficial interactions between the Pt and Fe species therein has been proposed to lead to the formation of highly efficient active interface sites. For example, Yan et al. [19] reported that mesoporous ferrihydrite and Fe3O4 nanoparticles obtained by a microemulsion-assisted method could be used as support materials in the preparation of highly active supported-Pt catalysts for HCHO oxidation. They suggested that the main features responsible for the superior catalytic activities of these supported-Pt catalysts were their surface hydroxyl groups, high Pt dispersions, and excellent adsorption performance.

Recently, significant progress has been made on the controlled synthesis of Fe3O4 materials with different crystallographic forms and morphologies, such as spheres, cubes, wires, nanorods, and octahedra [20-24]. Of these, well-defined octahedral Fe3O4 sub-microcrystal materials have drawn particular attention for their potential applications in environmental remediation and heterogeneous catalysis [25-27]. The thermodynamically stable octahedral Fe3O4 can provide an interface on which to assemble nanoparticles with high packing efficiency and structural stability. Furthermore, the bulky Fe3O4 crystallites are redox active, and their surface compositions can be adjusted by slight changes in oxygen partial pressure and substrate temperature. These features present numerous opportunities to develop highly efficient and thermally stable Fe3O4-based catalysts for application in many important processes [28-31].

In the current study, Pt catalysts supported on octahedral Fe3O4 crystals (Pt/Fe3O4) were prepared by a simple co-precipitation/thermal treatment method, and their catalytic properties were investigated for the low-temperature oxidation of HCHO. The effect of thermal-treatment temperature on the physicochemical properties and catalytic performance of the Pt/Fe3O4 catalysts was investigated using a variety of characterization techniques. As a result, it was found that the Pt/Fe3O4 catalyst thermally treated at a relatively low temperature (80 ℃) exhibited very high catalytic activity and stability in HCHO oxidation under ambient temperature and moisture conditions.

2 Experimental
2.1 Catalyst preparation

Pt/Fe3O4 catalysts were synthesized through a simple co-precipitation method previously reported in the literature with some modifications [25, 32]. Typically, 5.189 g FeCl2·4H2O was dissolved in 10 mL water and then mixed with 1.33 mL of a solution of H2PtCl6·6H2O (15 g/L) in a 250-mL three-neck round-bottom flask. The solution was then heated at 90 ℃ for 10 min to form a homogeneous solution. This mixture was then added to 100 mL KOH solution and vigorously stirred for 12 h. Finally, the resultant precipitate was washed with deionized water, separated via centrifugation, and dried at 80 ℃ for 6 h without any further thermal treatment. This as-prepared catalyst was labelled Pt/Fe3O4-80. Two more catalysts were obtained by thermal treatment of the above material at 200 and 300 ℃ in static air, and denoted as Pt/Fe3O4-200 and Pt/Fe3O4-300, respectively. The Pt loading was approximately 1.0 wt% for each catalyst. A reference sample of the Fe3O4 support alone was also prepared by the same method but without the addition of H2PtCl6·6H2O.

2.2 Catalyst characterization

Powder X-ray diffraction (XRD) patterns were obtained using a D/Max-rA X-ray diffractometer equipped with nickel-filtered Cu Kα radiation. 57Fe Mössbauer spectra were obtained using an OIMS-500 Mössbauer spectrum instrument. 57Co (Pd) was used as the λ-ray radioactive source and the velocity was calibrated against a standard α-iron foil. Magnetic measurements were performed on a SQUID-VSM magnetometer at room temperature. Transmission electron microscopy (TEM) images and high-angle annular dark field STEM (HAADF-STEM) images were acquired using a FEI Tecnai F20 EM operated at 200 kV and equipped with an energy-dispersive spectroscopy analyzer. N2-adsorption-desorption isotherms were obtained using a Micromeritics analyzer (ASAP 2010N). The Brunauer-Emmett-Teller (BET) model was used to calculate the surface areas. X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS) spectra were collected using an ESCALAB250 spectrometer with Al Kα radiation as the excitation source. All the elemental binding energies were corrected by adjusting the C 1s peak to 284.6 eV. Temperature-programmed reduction by H2 (H2-TPR) analysis was performed by an adsorption instrument equipped with a thermal conductivity detector (TCD). For each analysis, the samples were purged in a flow of Ar at 100 ℃ for 30 min. The H2-TPR experiments were performed using a 5% H2/Ar mixture (30 mL/min) over 0.1 g of catalyst at a heating rate of 10 ℃/min. The Fourier-transform infrared (FTIR) spectra of the samples were recorded using KBr disks on a Nicolet 6700 spectrometer.

2.3 Catalytic tests

The HCHO oxidation tests were carried out in a quartz tube reactor containing 0.1 g of solid catalyst (40-60 mesh). The gas mixture consisted of 400 ppm HCHO, 20 vol% O2, a certain amount of water vapor chosen to provide a relative humidity (RH) of 0-80%, and balanced with N2. Gaseous HCHO was generated by flowing N2 (coming from a mass flow controller) through aqueous formaldehyde kept in an incubator. Products and reactants were analyzed using a Techcomp GC-7900 gas chromatographer equipped with a TCD, and the catalytic activity of the catalyst under inspection was evaluated by the conversion of formaldehyde to CO2.

3 Results and discussion
3.1 Characterization of the catalysts

The XRD patterns of the three Pt/Fe3O4 catalysts (Pt/Fe3O4-80, Pt/Fe3O4-200, and Pt/Fe3O4-300) as well as the Fe3O4 support alone are presented in Fig. 1. All the samples show diffraction peaks characteristic of inverse spinel magnetite iron oxide (Fe3O4, JCPDS 65-3107) located at 2θ = 30.2°, 35.6°, 43.3°, 53.8°, 57.3°, 63.0°, and 78.3°, which can be attributed to the (220), (311), (400), (422), (511), (531), and (533) planes of Fe3O4, respectively [25, 29]. For the three Pt/Fe3O4 catalysts, the intensity of the diffraction peaks assigned to the Fe3O4 crystal phase increases with increasing thermal-treatment temperature, indicating improved Fe3O4 crystallinity in the Pt/Fe3O4 catalysts. No diffraction peaks related to Pt species could be detected by XRD for any of the Pt/Fe3O4 catalysts, indicating that the Pt species are highly dispersed on the Fe3O4 support.

Fig. 1. XRD patterns of Fe3O4 (1), Pt/Fe3O4-80 (2), Pt/Fe3O4-200 (3), and Pt/Fe3O4-300 (4).

The phase purity and crystal structure of Pt/Fe3O4-80 were further studied by Mössbauer spectroscopy. As shown in Fig. 2 and Table 1, the spectrum of Pt/Fe3O4-80 can be fitted to three six-line hyperfine sextets [29, 33]. The two major signals (shown in purple and blue) can be attributed to the Fe2+ and Fe3+ ions in tetrahedral (A) and octahedral (B) sites of Fe3O4, respectively, while the weak signal (green) is attributed to the Fe2+ ions in Fe(OH)2. Statistical analysis of the spectrum showed that the amount of magnetite in the sample was higher than 96.3%, suggesting that the phase purity of spinel Fe3O4 in the Pt/Fe3O4-80 catalyst is quite high.

Fig. 2. 57Fe Mössbauer spectrum of Pt/Fe3O4-80.
Table 1
The fine parameters of the curves fitted to the Mössbauer spectrum of Pt/Fe3O4-80.

The TEM and HRTEM images of Pt/Fe3O4 are displayed in Fig. 3. High-quality octahedral Fe3O4 crystals with well-defined facets, smooth surfaces, and straight edges can be clearly observed (Fig. 3(a)). Small Pt nanoparticles with a mean particle size of ≈2.5 nm are highly dispersed on the surface of the octahedral Fe3O4 (Fig. 3(b)-(d)). The lattice fringes with a d-spacing of 0.224 nm are consistent with the lattice spacing of the (111) plane of metallic Pt, while the lattice fringes with a d-spacing of 0.48 nm correspond to the (111) plane of Fe3O4 (Fig. 3(e) and (f)) [26]. High angle annular dark-field scanning transmission electron microscopy (HAADF-STEM) and EDS mapping analyses confirmed the uniform distribution of Pt nanoparticles over the surfaces of the Fe3O4 octahedral microcrystals (Fig. 4). The BET surface areas of Pt/Fe3O4-80, Pt/Fe3O4-200 and Pt/Fe3O4-300, determined by N2 adsorption-desorption measurement (Fig. 5), are ≈25, 22 and 21 m2/g, respectively, which are slightly higher than that of Fe3O4 support (19 m2/g).

Fig. 3. TEM images of Pt/Fe3O4-80 (a, b), Pt/Fe3O4-200 (c), Pt/Fe3O4-300 (d), HRTEM images of Pt/Fe3O4-80 (e, f) and particle size distribution of the corresponding sample (the inset images).
Fig. 4. HAADF-STEM images of Pt/Fe3O4-80 (a) and corresponding EDX mapping images for Fe (b, c), O (d), and Pt (e, f).
Fig. 5. Nitrogen adsorption-desorption isotherms of samples. (1) Fe3O4, (2) Pt/Fe3O4-80, (3) Pt/Fe3O4-200, (4)Pt/Fe3O4-300.

The XPS results for Fe3O4 and the Pt/Fe3O4 catalysts are shown in Fig. 6 and Table 2. In the Fe 2p XPS spectrum of Fe3O4 (Fig. 6(a1)), the peaks at 711.2 and 724.6 eV can be ascribed to Fe 2p3/2 and Fe 2p1/2, respectively [34, 35]. The spectrum can be fitted to three main peaks and two satellite peaks in the 2p3/2 region on the basis of the related literature [34-38]. The peak at 709.8 eV (together with the satellite peak at 715.4 eV) can be attributed to Fe2+, while the peaks at 711.3 and 713.0 eV are assigned to Fe3+ octahedral species and Fe3+ tetrahedral species, respectively. In addition, the Fe3+ shake-up satellite feature is observed at 718.9 eV. Compared with that of Fe3O4, the binding energies for Fe 2p3/2 for the Pt/Fe3O4 catalysts are shifted slightly toward higher values (Fig. 6(a2)), suggesting that the redox properties of Fe3O4 change somewhat upon introducing a small amount of Pt species, which indicates interaction between the Pt nanoparticles and the Fe3O4 support [25]. Additionally, the Fe2+/Fe3+ ratios for the three Pt/Fe3O4 catalysts (Table 2), estimated from the deconvoluted XPS spectra, are all around 0.5, which is quite consistent with the stoichiometry of Fe3O4.

Fig. 6. Fe 2p (a), O 1s (b), and Pt 4f (c) XPS spectra for all samples. (1) Fe3O4, (2) Pt/Fe3O4-80, (3) Pt/Fe3O4-200, (4) Pt/Fe3O4-300.

The O 1s spectra obtained for Fe3O4 and the Pt/Fe3O4 catalysts are shown in Fig. 6(b). The spectrum can be deconvoluted into three peaks, peak Ⅰ at ≈529.8 eV can be assigned to O2- ions in the lattice oxygen of Fe3O4 (denoted as OL), peak II at ≈531.3 eV can be attributed to the oxygen in the surface OH groups and/or oxygen vacancies of Fe3O4 (denoted as Os), and peak Ⅲ at ≈532.4 eV originates from the adsorption of H2O on the surface of the Fe3O4 support upon exposure to air [29, 37]. As observed in Table 2, the percentage of OS follows the order: Pt/Fe3O4-80 > Pt/Fe3O4-200 > Pt/Fe3O4-300, indicating that Pt/Fe3O4-80 possesses the largest amount of surface OH groups and/or oxygen vacancies.

Table 2
Summary of the XPS data obtained for the catalysts.

Fig. 6(c) shows the Pt 4f XPS spectra for the Pt/Fe3O4 catalysts. After curve fitting, the spectra comprise two pairs of peaks at 71.3 and 74.7 eV, and at 72.4 and 75.6 eV, which are assigned to Pt0 and Pt2+, respectively [17, 39, 40]. For Pt/Fe3O4-80, Pt0 is the major species (Pt2+/Pt0 = 0.36). However, increasing the thermal-treatment temperature results in an increase of Pt2+ concentration (Table 2).

The FTIR spectra of Fe3O4 and the Pt/Fe3O4 catalysts are shown in Fig. 7. The broad and strong absorbance peaks at 2800-3800 cm-1 can be attributed to the stretching vibrations of OH groups and physically adsorbed water. The band centered at 1623 cm-1 can be ascribed to the deformation vibrations of OH groups [25, 41]. For the three Pt/Fe3O4 catalysts, the intensities of these bands decrease slightly with increasing thermal-treatment temperature, suggesting that a certain number of surface OH groups are present on the surface of the Pt/Fe3O4 catalysts. This is consistent with the XPS results discussed above.

Fig. 7. FTIR spectra of Fe3O4 (1), Pt/Fe3O4-80 (2), Pt/Fe3O4-200 (3), and Pt/Fe3O4-300 (4).

The H2-TPR profiles of the three Pt/Fe3O4 catalysts and the Fe3O4 support are shown in Fig. 8. For all the samples, the high-temperature reduction peaks that appear at around or above 650 ℃ correspond to the reduction of Fe3O4 to FeO and then to Fe [17, 42]. For the octahedral Fe3O4, the two weak reduction peaks centered at 340 and 450 ℃ are related to the reduction of trace amounts of surface Fe3+ to Fe2+. For Pt/Fe3O4-80, the low-temperature reduction peaks located at ca. 80 and 110 ℃ can be mainly assigned to the reduction of oxidized Pt species as well as to the reduction of some of the Fe3+ species located either at the interface of the Pt nanoparticles and the Fe3O4 support (i.e., Fe3+-O-Pt species) or close to the Pt nanoparticles via spillover of H atoms from the Pt species to Fe3+ species [17, 42]. The enhanced reduction ability of the Fe3O4 support may be assigned to the increased density of lattice defects and surface oxygen vacancies caused by the introduction of Pt species. For Pt/Fe3O4-200 and Pt/Fe3O4-300, the low-temperature reduction peak shifts slightly to higher temperature and is much stronger in comparison with that of Pt/Fe3O4-80. The higher H2 consumption for these two catalysts indicates that a larger number of their Fe3+ species can be reduced at low temperature, implying relatively strong interactions between the Pt species and the Fe3O4 support.

Fig. 8. H2-TPR profiles of Fe3O4 (1), Pt/Fe3O4-80 (2), Pt/Fe3O4-200 (3), and Pt/Fe3O4-300 (4).

The above characterization results indicate that Pt/Fe3O4 catalysts can be obtained by a facile co-precipitation method in which small Pt nanoparticles disperse uniformly on the surface of the Fe3O4 octahedra. Relatively abundant surface OH groups or oxygen vacancies are present on the surfaces of the Pt/Fe3O4 catalysts. Interface species such as Pt-O(OH)x-Fe are formed during the preparation of the Pt/Fe3O4 catalysts. Changing the thermal-treatment temperature for the Pt/Fe3O4 catalysts can adjust the redox properties of the catalysts and can also influence the interface interactions between the Pt nanoparticles and octahedral Fe3O4 supports.

3.2 Catalytic activity

Fig. 9 shows the temperature dependence of HCHO conversion over the Pt/Fe3O4 catalysts and Fe3O4. Under the test conditions, the Fe3O4 support is inactive for HCHO oxidation in the temperature range 25−100 ℃. However, all three Pt/Fe3O4 catalysts are catalytically active for HCHO oxidation in the presence of water vapor (RH = 30%) at relatively low temperatures. Among them, Pt/Fe3O4-80 exhibits the highest activity, completely converting HCHO to CO2 and H2O at room temperature. The catalytic activities of the Pt/Fe3O4 catalysts decrease with increasing thermal-treatment temperature. Accordingly, complete oxidation of HCHO could only be achieved over Pt/Fe3O4-200 and Pt/Fe3O4-300 at 60 and 80 ℃. These results suggest that inverse-spinel octahedral Fe3O4 can be used as a suitable support for the construction of a highly efficient supported Pt catalyst for low-temperature oxidation of HCHO. Its superior catalytic performance is comparable with those of even the most active iron oxide- (or ferrihydrite) -supported Pt catalysts, such as Pt/Fe2O3 and Pt/ferrihydrite, as well as those of the alumina-supported iron-promoted Pt catalysts (Pt-FeOx/Al2O3) reported in the literature [17, 19, 43].

Fig. 9. Catalytic activities of the three Pt/Fe3O4 catalysts and the Fe3O4 support for HCHO oxidation. Reaction conditions: HCHO 400 ppm, O2 20 vol%, N2 balance, RH = 30%, and gas hourly space velocity: 60, 000 cm3/(g·h).

The effect of gas hourly space velocity (GHSV) on the catalytic activity of Pt/Fe3O4-80 is presented in Fig. 10. For GHSV = 60, 000 cm3/(g·h), complete oxidation of HCHO is achieved at room temperature. With increasing GHSV (i.e., decreasing contact time), the conversion of HCHO decreases to 93.5% and 84.1% for GHSVs of 90, 000 and 120, 000 cm3/(g·h), respectively.

Fig. 10. Effect of GHSV on the catalytic activity of Pt/Fe3O4-80 for HCHO oxidation. Reaction conditions: HCHO 400 ppm, O2 20 vol%, N2 balance, and RH = 30%.

In addition, the catalytic durability of Pt/Fe3O4-80 was investigated by conducting a seven-day experiment in which a three-hour reaction was carried out on each day. As shown in Fig. 11, no obvious change in catalytic activity is observed, indicating the excellent stability of the catalyst.

Fig. 11. Stability study of Pt/Fe3O4-80 for HCHO oxidation in which the reaction was performed for 3 h each day over seven days. Reaction conditions: HCHO 400 ppm, O2 20 vol%, N2 balance, GHSV = 60, 000 cm3/(g·h), RH = 30%, 25 ℃.

As water vapor inevitably exists in the atmosphere for HCHO oxidation, the effect of RH on the catalytic activity of Pt/Fe3O4-80 was also investigated at room temperature. As shown in Fig. 12, the conversion of HCHO increases from 81.2% to 100% when the RH increases from 0 to 30%. Upon further increasing the RH to 80% a slight decrease in catalytic activity (98.5% HCHO conversion) is detected. These results suggest that the catalytic activity of Pt/Fe3O4-80 for HCHO oxidation is significantly improved by adding water vapor to the feed gas in a wide RH range (i.e. from 30% to 80%).

Fig. 12. Effect of RH on HCHO conversion over Pt/Fe3O4-80. Reaction conditions: HCHO 400 ppm, O2 20 vol%, N2 balance, GHSV = 60, 000 cm3/(g·h), 25 ℃.
3.3 Discussion

Previous studies have demonstrated that iron-based oxides, such as Fe2O3, Fe3O4, and ferrihydrite, can be used as efficient supports to prepare highly active supported Pt catalysts for low-temperature oxidation of HCHO [17-19]. However, the preparation processes for these iron-oxide-supported Pt catalysts are all multiple-step procedures that require organic solvents and/or surfactants. Furthermore, the resultant iron oxide supports (Fe2O3 or Fe3O4) usually comprise irregular spherical nanoparticles. Thus, they are not necessarily very attractive as materials for developing commercial catalysts owing to their relatively complicated preparation procedures and low structural stabilities.

Our present work indicates that catalysts comprising Pt nanoparticles supported on octahedral Fe3O4 microcrystals (Pt/Fe3O4) with superior HCHO oxidation activities can be obtained by a facile co-precipitation method without using organic solvents or surfactants. It should be mentioned here that it is unusual to get the octahedral Fe3O4 microcrystals at such low preparation temperatures (90 ℃). On the basis of a few related literatures [25, 32, 44], the formation of octahedral Fe3O4 microcrystals may be described with the so-called -œoriented aggregation-. During the preparation process, Fe3O4 magnetite nucleis easily form when high concentration of KOH solution is added into the hydrothermal system containing Fe2+ cations. The main driving force for the oriented aggregation of nanoparticles is generally attributed to the tendency for reducing the high surface energy via the attachment (or rotation) of the primary Fe3O4 nanoparticles caused by various interactions, such as Brownian motion. The formation of uniformed octahedral Fe3O4 microcrystals implies the fact that the growth rates of the Fe3O4 core in three axes directions are equivalent [32]. Besides, the crystal planes exposed on the surface of octahedral Fe3O4 seems quite suitable for uniformly dispersing small Pt nanoparticles, which can finally result in the formation of highly active Pt/Fe3O4 catalysts for the oxidation of HCHO.

The relatively high activity of Pt/Fe3O4-80 should be an indicative of the presence of more interface active sites (like Pt-O-FeOx) through building suitable metal-support interaction between Pt species and octahedral Fe3O4. Furthermore, the relatively high structural and thermal stabilities of octahedral Fe3O4 microcrystals [44, 45] suggest that the resultant active interface sites formed on the Pt/Fe3O4 surface catalysts should be highly stabile, allowing long-term usage. According to the analysis results obtained in the current study, surface OH groups and/or oxygen vacancies are relatively abundant on the crystal planes of the octahedral Fe3O4 catalysts, indicating that highly active interface species like Pt-O-FeOx and Pt-O(OH)x-FeOx are easily formed during the preparation of the Pt/Fe3O4 catalysts. Different thermal-treatment temperatures result in clear changes in the redox properties of the Pt/Fe3O4 catalysts by adjusting the strength of interface interactions between Pt nanoparticles and the Fe3O4 support, thus having a significant effect on the catalytic activities of the Pt/Fe3O4 catalysts. Our previous works have also revealed that such interface interaction between Pt nanoparitcles and the oxide supports, like fumed SiO2 and FeOx modified Al2O3, indeed plays quite positive role in enhancing the catalytic activity of the supported Pt catalysts [43, 46].

Considering the influence of water on the reactivity of the Pt/Fe3O4 catalysts, several recent studies have demonstrated that water participates in the catalytic oxidation process directly after dissociative chemisorption on the active interfacial sites of iron-oxide-supported Pt catalysts [47-49]. For instance, Ringleb et al. [49] reported that co-adsorption of oxygen and water on monolayer FeO(111)/Pt(111) transforms the film into a hydroxyl-terminated trilayer with a Pt-O-Fe-OH structural motif that shows activity in the low-temperature oxidation of CO, similarly to the non-hydroxylated counterpart. In another work, Chen et al. [50] reported that CO directly reacted with interfacial Pt-OH-Fe3+ sites of oxide-supported PtFeNi catalysts, and that the interfacial sites could be readily recovered upon contact with H2O and O2. In the present work, the existence of interfacial sites like Pt-O-FeOx and Pt-O(OH)-FeOx has been deduced based on XPS and FTIR analyses. Therefore, we propose here that the promoting role of water is due to the existence of active OH groups (i.e., in the form of Pt-O(OH)-FeOx), which can directly participate HCHO oxidation through a H2O/O2-mediated oxidation process, at the surface/interface of the Pt/Fe3O4 catalysts.

4 Conclusions

Octahedral-Fe3O4-microcrystal-supported Pt catalysts have been prepared by a facile precipitation method. The resultant Pt/Fe3O4 catalysts showed high activity and stability for the low-temperature oxidation of HCHO. A variety of characterization techniques revealed that the Pt nanoparticles were well dispersed on the surface of the octahedral Fe3O4, and abundant active interface sites were present on the Pt/Fe3O4 catalyst thermally treated at a lower temperature. We believe that these catalysts have considerable potential for practical application to the removal of formaldehyde under ambient conditions.

References
[1]
A. P. Jones, Atmos. Environ., 1999, 33: 4535-4564. DOI:10.1016/S1352-2310(99)00272-1
[2]
J. Gunschera, S. Mentese, S. T. Salthammer, J. R. Andersen, Build. Environ., 2013, 64: 138-145. DOI:10.1016/j.buildenv.2013.03.001
[3]
X. J. Tang, Y. Bai, A. Duong, M. T. Smith, L. Y. Li, L. P. Zhang, Environ. Int., 2009, 35: 1210-1224. DOI:10.1016/j.envint.2009.06.002
[4]
T. Salthammer, Angew. Chem. Int. Ed., 2013, 52: 3320-3327. DOI:10.1002/anie.v52.12
[5]
L. H. Nie, J. G. Yu, M. Jaroniec, F. F. Tao, Catal. Sci. Technol., 2016, 6: 3649-3669. DOI:10.1039/C6CY00062B
[6]
H. B. Huang, Y. Xu, Q. Y. Feng, D. Y. C. Leung, Catal. Sci. Technol., 2015, 5: 2649-2669. DOI:10.1039/C4CY01733A
[7]
B. Y. Bai, Q. Qiao, J. H. Li, J. M. Hao, Chin. J. Catal., 2016, 37: 102-122. DOI:10.1016/S1872-2067(15)61007-5
[8]
J. Quiroz Torres, S. Royer, J. P. Bellat, J. M. Giraudon, J. F. Lamonier, ChemSusChem, 2013, 6: 578-592. DOI:10.1002/cssc.201200809
[9]
Y. N. Shen, X. Z. Yang, Y. Z. Wang, Y. B. Zhang, H. Y. Zhu, L. Gao, M. L. Jia, Appl. Catal. B, 2008, 79: 142-148. DOI:10.1016/j.apcatb.2007.09.042
[10]
C. B. Zhang, F. D. Liu, Y. P. Zhai, H. Ariga, N. Yi, Y. C. Liu, K. Asakura, M. Flytzani-Stephanopoulos, H. He, Angew. Chem. Int. Ed., 2012, 51: 9628-9632. DOI:10.1002/anie.v51.38
[11]
L. Ma, D. S. Wang, J. H. Li, B. Y. Bai, L. X. Fu, Y. D. Li, Appl. Catal. B, 2014, 148-149: 36-43. DOI:10.1016/j.apcatb.2013.10.039
[12]
H. B. Huang, Y. C. Dennis, ACS Catal., 2011, 1: 348-354. DOI:10.1021/cs200023p
[13]
J. H. Zhang, Y. B. Li, L. Wang, C. B. Zhang, H. He, Catal. Sci.Technol., 2015, 5: 2305-2313. DOI:10.1039/C4CY01461H
[14]
P. Liu, H. P. He, G. L. Wei, X. L. Liang, F. H. Qi, F. D. Tan, W. Tan, J. X. Zhu, R. L. Zhu, Appl. Catal. B, 2016, 182: 476-484. DOI:10.1016/j.apcatb.2015.09.055
[15]
Y. C. Huang, W. J. Fan, B. Long, H. B. Li, W. T. Qiu, F. Y. Zhao, Y. C. Tong, H. B. Ji, J. Mater. Chem. A, 2016, 4: 3648-3654. DOI:10.1039/C5TA09370H
[16]
B. Y. Bai, H. Arandiyan, J. H. Li, Appl. Catal. B, 2013, 142-143: 677-683. DOI:10.1016/j.apcatb.2013.05.056
[17]
N. H. An, Q. H. Yu, G. Liu, S. Y. Li, M. J. Jia, W. X. Zhang, J. Hazard. Mater., 2011, 186: 1392-1397. DOI:10.1016/j.jhazmat.2010.12.018
[18]
N. H. An, P. Wu, S. Y. Li, M. J. Jia, W. X. Zhang, Appl. Surf. Sci., 2013, 285: 805-809. DOI:10.1016/j.apsusc.2013.08.132
[19]
Z. X. Yan, Z. H. Xu, J. G. Yu, M. Jaroniec, Environ. Sci. Technol., 2015, 49: 6637-6644. DOI:10.1021/acs.est.5b00532
[20]
L. Suber, P. Imperatori, G. Ausanio, F. Fabbri, H. Hofmeister, J. Phys. Chem. B, 2005, 109: 7103-7109. DOI:10.1021/jp045737f
[21]
Y. J. Chen, G. Xiao, T. S. Wang, Q. Y. Ouyang, L. H. Qi, Y. Ma, P. Gao, C. L. Zhu, M. S. Cao, H. B. Jin, J. Phys. Chem. C, 2011, 115: 13603-13608. DOI:10.1021/jp202473y
[22]
L. H. Zhang, J. J. Wu, H. B. Liao, Y. L. Hou, S. Gao, Chem. Commun., 2009, 4378-4380.
[23]
M. V. Kovalenko, M. I. Bodnarchuk, R. T. Lechner, G. Hesser, F. Schaffler, W. Heiss, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2007, 129: 6352-6353. DOI:10.1021/ja0692478
[24]
J. Kim, J. E. Lee, S. H. Lee, J. H. Yu, J. H. Lee, T. G. Park, T. Hyeon, Adv. Mater., 2008, 20: 478-483. DOI:10.1002/(ISSN)1521-4095
[25]
G. N. Li, L. Li, B. H. Wu, J. X. Li, Y. Yuan, J. L. Shi, Nanoscale, 2015, 7: 17855-17860. DOI:10.1039/C5NR05933J
[26]
C. M. Shang, G. B. Ji, W. Liu, X. M. Zhang, H. L. Lv, Y. W. Du, RSC Adv., 2015, 5: 80450-80456. DOI:10.1039/C5RA15949K
[27]
C. Lemire, R. Meyer, V. E. Henrich, S. Shaikhutdinov, H. J. Freund, Surf. Sci., 2004, 572: 103-114. DOI:10.1016/j.susc.2004.08.033
[28]
H. T. Yu, Y. C. Li, X. H. Li, L. Z. Fan, S. H. Yang, J. Mater. Chem. A, 2014, 2: 15763-15767. DOI:10.1039/C4TA03476G
[29]
L. L. Geng, B. Zheng, X. Wang, W. X. Zhang, S. J. Wu, M. J. Jia, W. F. Yan, G. Liu, ChemCatChem, 2016, 8: 805-811. DOI:10.1002/cctc.v8.4
[30]
H. Li, J. Y. Liao, X. B. Zhang, J. Mater. Chem. A, 2014, 2: 17530-17535. DOI:10.1039/C4TA02966F
[31]
R. Hudson, Y. T. Feng, R. S. Varma, A. Moores, Green Chem., 2014, 16: 4493-4505. DOI:10.1039/C4GC00418C
[32]
W. G. Yu, T. L. Zhang, J. G. Zhang, X. J. Qiao, L.Yang, Y. H. Liu, Mater. Lett., 2006, 60: 2998-3001. DOI:10.1016/j.matlet.2006.02.032
[33]
I. S. Lyubutin, C. R. Lin, Y. V. Korzhetskiy, T. V. Dmitrieva, R. K. Chiang, J. Appl. Phys., 2009, 106: 034311/1-034311/6.
[34]
T. Yamashita, P. Hayes, Appl. Surf. Sci., 2008, 254: 2441-2449. DOI:10.1016/j.apsusc.2007.09.063
[35]
D. Wilson, M. A. Langell, Appl. Surf. Sci., 2014, 303: 6-13. DOI:10.1016/j.apsusc.2014.02.006
[36]
S. Poulin, R. Franc, L. Moreau, - Bexlanger, E. Sache, J. Phys. Chem. C, 2010, 114: 10711-10718. DOI:10.1021/jp100964x
[37]
T. C. Lin, G. Seshadri, J. A. Kelber, Appl. Surf. Sci., 1997, 119: 83-92. DOI:10.1016/S0169-4332(97)00167-0
[38]
N. A. Eltouny, P. A. Ariya, Ind. Eng. Chem. Res., 2012, 51: 12787-12795. DOI:10.1021/ie3019092
[39]
L. Q. Liu, F. Zhou, L. G. Wang, X. J. Qi, F. Shi, Y. Q. Deng, J. Catal., 2010, 274: 1-10. DOI:10.1016/j.jcat.2010.05.022
[40]
B. Zheng, G. Liu, L. L. Geng, J. Y. Cui, S. J. Wu, P. Wu, M. J. Jia, W. F. Yan, W. X. Zhang, Catal. Sci. Technol., 2016, 6: 1546-1554. DOI:10.1039/C5CY00840A
[41]
B. B. Chen, X. B. Zhu, M. Crocker, Y. Wang, C. Shi, Appl. Catal. B, 2014, 154-155: 73-81. DOI:10.1016/j.apcatb.2014.02.009
[42]
N. H. An, S. Y. Li, P. N. Duchesne, P. Wu, W. L. Zhang, J. F. Lee, S. Cheng, P. Zhang, M. J. Jia, W. X. Zhang, J. Phys. Chem. C, 2013, 117: 21254-21262. DOI:10.1021/jp404266p
[43]
W. Y. Cui, X. L. Yuan, P. Wu, B. Zheng, W. X. Zhang, M. J. Jia, RSC Adv., 2015, 5: 104330-104336. DOI:10.1039/C5RA19151C
[44]
W. Zhang, L. G. Gai, J. L. Li, H. H. Jiang, W. Y. Ma, J. Phys. D, 2008, 41(225001): 1-6.
[45]
B. Y. Geng, J. Z. Ma, J. H. You. Cryst. Growth. Des., 2008, 8: 1443-1447. DOI:10.1021/cg700931u
[46]
N. H. An, W. L. Zhang, X. L. Yuan, B. Pan, G. Liu, M. J. Jia, W. F. Yan, W. X. Zhang, Chem. Eng. J., 2013, 215-216: 1-6. DOI:10.1016/j.cej.2012.10.096
[47]
S. Y. Li, M. J. Jia, J. Gao, P. Wu, W. L. Yang, S. H. Huang, X. W. Dou, Y. Yang, W. X. Zhang, J. Phys. Chem. C, 2015, 119: 2483-2490. DOI:10.1021/jp508786y
[48]
R. Rajasree, J. H. B. J. Hoebink, J. C. Schouten, J. Catal., 2004, 223: 36-43. DOI:10.1016/j.jcat.2003.12.014
[49]
F. Ringleb, Y. Fujimori, H. F. Wang, H. Ariga, E. Carrasco, M. Sterrer, H. J. Freund, L. Giordano, G. Pacchioni, J. Goniakowski, J. Phys. Chem. C, 2011, 115: 19328-19335. DOI:10.1021/jp207332n
[50]
G. X. Chen, Y. Zhao, G. Fu, P. N. Duchesne, L. Gu, Y. P. Zheng, X. F. Weng, M. S. Chen, P. Zhang, C. W. Pao, J. F. Lee, N. F. Zheng, Science, 2014, 344: 495-499. DOI:10.1126/science.1252553