催化学报  2019, Vol. 40 Issue (8): 1153-1159      DOI: S1872-2067(19)63352-8   PDF    
扩展功能
加入收藏夹
复制引文信息
加入引用管理器
Email Alert
RSS
本文作者相关文章
Wenzhen Zhang
Yuqian Sun
Min Zhang
Hui Zhou
Xiaobing Lu
Silver-catalyzed carboxylative cyclization of alkynic hydrazones with carbon dioxide
Wenzhen Zhang, Yuqian Sun, Min Zhang, Hui Zhou, Xiaobing Lu     
State Key Laboratory of Fine Chemicals, Dalian University of Technology, Dalian 110624, Liaoning, China
* Corresponding author. Wenzhen Zhang, Tel: +86-411-84986257; Fax: +86-411-84986256; E-mail: zhangwz@dlut.edu.cn
This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (21878038), the Natural Science Foundation of Liaoning Province (20170540156), and the Program for Changjiang Scholars and Innovative Research Team in University (IRT-17R14)
Abstract: The development of new catalytic methodologies to synthesize heterocyclic fine chemicals using carbon dioxide as a synthon has attracted considerable attention. Herein, we report the silver(I)-catalyzed carboxylative cyclization of a variety of alkynic hydrazones with carbon dioxide to produce the corresponding 1, 3, 4-oxadiazin-2-ones under mild reaction conditions. In this reaction, silver(I) salts play a π-Lewis acid role for the highly efficient activation of the alkyne moiety in the hydrazone substrates. Single-crystal X-ray analysis and NOE experiments confirm that the newly formed oxadiazinone products exhibit Z configuration. Based on control experiments and NMR studies, a mechanism including the formation of a reactive carbazate intermediate, electrophilic cyclization, and subsequent protonation is proposed. This study offers an efficient and atom-economical method for the synthesis of biologically important 1, 3, 4-oxadiazin-2-ones.
© 2019, Dalian Institute of Chemical Physics, Chinese Academy of Sciences.
Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
Key words: Carbon dioxide    Silver catalysis    Carboxylative cyclization    Alkynic hydrazine    Oxadiazinone    Homogeneous catalysis    
银催化炔基腙与二氧化碳的羧化环化反应
张文珍, 孙玉乾, 张敏, 周辉, 吕小兵     
大连理工大学精细化工国家重点实验室, 辽宁大连 116024
摘要:将二氧化碳作为羰一合成子催化转化成重要的杂环精细化学品的方法学研究受到广泛关注.1,3,4-噁二嗪-2-酮类化合物是一类具有重要生理活性的氮氧杂环化合物,广泛用于医药如钙增敏剂、强心剂、杀菌及除草剂等.传统的合成此类化合物的方法包括环状碳酸酯与肼的反应、肼基甲酸酯化合物的闭环反应等,其反应步骤长,效率低,不够经济绿色.本文开发了一种银催化的炔腙类化合物与二氧化碳羧化环化新反应用于高效合成1,3,4-噁二嗪-2-酮.首先选取苯乙炔基羟乙基腙与二氧化碳的羧化环化反应作为模式反应,筛选出适用于此反应的最优反应条件为:5 mol%醋酸银为催化剂,5 mol%碳酸铯为碱,二氧化碳压力为2.0 MPa,二甲基亚砜为溶剂,25 ℃下反应2 h.炔腙分子中碳氮双键的顺反构型对其羧化反应活性没有影响.当使用化学当量的叔丁醇钾或氢化钠等作为碱时,即使在2.0 MPa的二氧化碳存在下,炔腙底物也几乎全部转化成非羧化闭环产物吡唑类化合物.在最优反应条件下,氮原子上烷基取代或未取代的炔腙底物能与二氧化碳高效发生羧化环化反应,以54%-90%的产率得到20多种1,3,4-噁二嗪-2-酮产物.反应放大到克级时依旧能高效进行.产物的X射线单晶衍射及氢核磁NOE实验证实,新形成的碳碳双键为顺式结构.当使用氮原子上芳基取代的炔腙时,由于底物中氮原子的亲核反应活性较差,目标羧化产物产率很低.一价银盐通常在二氧化碳参与的羧化反应中作为路易斯酸催化剂活化碳碳叁键.本文对照实验也证明在此羧化环化反应中银盐具有不可或缺的催化作用.改变反应气氛的实验也验证了1,3,4-噁二嗪-2-酮产物中的羰基来自二氧化碳.氢核磁跟踪实验观察到加入催化量碱能有效促进关键肼基甲酸根中间体的形成.以此为依据,本文提出了包含二氧化碳插入炔腙底物形成肼基甲酸根、羧基氧亲核进攻银盐活化的碳碳叁键形成烯基银中间体、质子化得到1,3,4-噁二嗪-2-酮产物及再生银催化剂及碱的催化反应机理.总之,本文发展了一种银催化的简单易得的炔腙类化合物与二氧化碳的羧化环化新反应,为1,3,4-噁二嗪-2-酮类化合物的合成提供了一种方便高效的方法.
关键词二氧化碳    银催化    羧化环化反应    炔基腙    噁二嗪酮    均相催化    

1 Introduction

The catalytic transformation of carbon dioxide (CO2) into valuable chemicals has attracted much attention as CO2 is an abundant, inexpensive, and renewable C1 feedstock [1-7]. Compared to the industrial large-scale transformation of CO2 into bulk chemicals, such as urea, salicylic acid, carbonate, and methanol, the preparation of fine chemicals using CO2 as a synthetic unit remains scarce [8]. Therefore, the development of more efficient reactions to catalytically convert CO2 into various valuable compounds is of high relevance [9, 10]. Among these strategies, cyclization reactions represent the most commonly used and powerful approach as heterocycles offer tremendous diversity and are widely present in biologically important molecules [11, 12]. Since CO2 usually serves as an electrophile, it can be incorporated into heterocyclic compounds via the reaction with nitrogen [13-15], oxygen [16-20], or carbon nucleophiles [21-26].

1, 3, 4-Oxadiazin-2-ones are important structural subunits found in many pharmacologically potent and biologically active compounds. Those compounds can be used as selective Ca2+ sensitizers, anticonvulsants, anxiolytic, antiulcer agents [27, 28], and useful 1, 2-diaza-1, 3-butadiene precursors for the construction of other fine chemicals [29]. Typically, 1, 3, 4-oxadiazin-2-ones are prepared by the reaction of cyclic carbonate with hydrazine or by using carbazates through laborious multistep procedures [30, 31]. Therefore, the development of more efficient and atom-economical approaches using CO2 as the carboxylative reagent is highly desirable. As a continuation of our interest in catalytic transformations of CO2 into fine chemicals [32-34], herein we report a silver-catalyzed carboxylative cyclization of alkynic hydrazones with CO2 to give 1, 3, 4-oxadiazin-2-ones in good yield under mild reaction conditions.

2 Experimental
2.1 General information

Unless otherwise stated, all manipulations were performed using standard Schlenk techniques under dry nitrogen or CO2 atmosphere. DMF and DMSO were distilled under N2 atmosphere with CaH2. CH3CN was distilled with P2O5. THF was distilled from sodium/benzophenone. All solvents were stored over 4Å molecular sieves before use. Column chromatography was performed on silica gel (200–300 mesh). Thin layer chromatography was performed on 0.20 mm GF254 plates, which were visualized under UV light (254 nm). Unless otherwise stated, CO2 (99.999%), commercial silver, copper, and palladium salts, and various bases were used without further purification.

NMR spectra were recorded on a 400M or 500M (1H NMR, 400 or 500 MHz; 13C NMR, 101 or 126 MHz) spectrometer in CDCl3 at ambient temperature, and the chemical shifts are expressed in parts per million (δ, ppm). The proton chemical shifts have been referenced to 7.26 ppm (CHCl3) or 2.50 ppm (DMSO) and carbon chemical shifts to 77.0 ppm (CHCl3) or 39.5 ppm (DMSO). The data is reported using the following abbreviations: s, singlet; d, doublet; t, triplet; m, multiplet; hept, heptet; and J, coupling constant in Hz. High resolution mass spectra (HRMS) were recorded on a Q-TOF mass spectrometer equipped with a Z-spray ionization source. Infrared (IR) spectra were measured using a Nicolet NEXUS FT-IR spectrophotometer.

Substrates 1 and 4 were prepared according to reported procedures [35].

2.2 General procedure for the carboxylative cyclization of alkynic hydrazones with CO2

A 20 mL oven-dried autoclave containing a stir bar was charged with hydrazone (0.30 mmol), Cs2CO3 (4.9 mg, 5 mol%), AgOAc (2.5 mg, 5 mol%), and 3.0 mL DMSO in a glove box. After removal from the glove box, the autoclave was purged with CO2 three times and then pressurized at 2.0 MPa CO2. The reaction mixture was stirred at 25 ℃ for 2 h, after which the remaining gas was vented slowly in the hood. The reaction mixture was diluted with 10 mL water and extracted with diethyl ether (3 × 10 mL). The combined organic phase was washed with brine (2 × 10 mL), dried over anhydrous Na2SO4, and concentrated under reduced pressure. The residue was purified by flash column chromatography on silica gel using petroleum/ethyl acetate as the eluent to afford the following oxadiazinone products.

(Z)-6-Benzylidene-3-(2-hydroxyethyl)-3, 6-dihydro-2H-1, 3, 4-oxadiazin-2-one (2a). White solid (0.30 mmol scale, 59 mg, 85% yield). Rf = 0.4 (EtOAc/petroleum ether = 2:1). 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3): δ 7.68 (d, J = 7.3 Hz, 2H), 7.36 (t, J = 7.4 Hz, 2H), 7.32–7.30 (m, 1H), 7.23 (s, 1H), 5.76 (s, 1H), 3.97–3.92 (m, 4H), 2.59 (s, 1H) ppm. 13C NMR (101 MHz, CDCl3): δ 144.52, 141.09, 138.07, 132.29, 129.68, 128.73, 128.64, 113.05, 60.39, 53.01 ppm. HRMS (ESI, m/z) calculated for C12H13N2O3 [M+H]+: 233.0926, found: 233.0924. IR (neat): ν 3443, 2925, 1732, 1275 cm–1.

(Z)-6-Benzylidene-3-(2-cyanoethyl)-3, 6-dihydro-2H-1, 3, 4-oxadiazin-2-one (2b). White solid (0.30 mmol scale, 56 mg, 77% yield). Rf = 0.3 (EtOAc/petroleum ether = 1:1). 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3): δ 7.68 (d, J = 7.6 Hz, 2H), 7.43–7.28 (m, 4H), 5.82 (s, 1H), 4.06 (t, J = 6.8 Hz, 2H), 2.79 (t, J = 6.8 Hz, 2H) ppm. 13C NMR (101 MHz, CDCl3): δ 143.62, 140.74, 138.57, 132.03, 129.78, 128.98, 128.67, 116.89, 114.00, 46.59, 16.38 ppm. HRMS (ESI, m/z) calculated for C13H12N3 [M+H]+: 242.0930, found: 242.0929. IR (neat): ν 2924, 2250, 1738, 1630 cm–1.

(Z)-6-Benzylidene-3-isopropyl-3, 6-dihydro-2H-1, 3, 4-oxadiazin-2-one (2c). White solid (0.30 mmol scale, 48 mg, 69% yield. Rf = 0.5 (EtOAc/petroleum ether = 1:5). 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3): δ 7.70 (d, J = 7.6 Hz, 2H), 7.37 (t, J = 7.5 Hz, 2H), 7.32–7.24 (m, 2H), 5.73 (s, 1H), 4.70 (p, J = 6.7 Hz, 1H), 1.30 (d, J = 6.7 Hz, 6H) ppm. 13C NMR (101 MHz, CDCl3): δ 143.57, 141.21, 137.59, 132.67, 129.57, 128.64, 128.45, 111.85, 50.46, 19.96 ppm. HRMS (ESI, m/z) calculated for C13H14N2NaO2 [M+Na]+: 253.0953, found: 253.0953. IR (neat): ν 3443, 2921, 1732 cm–1.

(Z)-3-Benzyl-6-benzylidene-3, 6-dihydro-2H-1, 3, 4-oxadiazin-2-one (2d). White solid (0.30 mmol scale, 75 mg, 90% yield). Rf = 0.4 (EtOAc/petroleum ether = 1:5). 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3): δ 7.70 (d, J = 7.5 Hz, 2H), 7.45–7.31 (m, 8H), 7.23 (s, 1H), 5.76 (s, 1H), 4.94 (s, 2H) ppm. 13C NMR (101 MHz, CDCl3): δ 144.03, 141.39, 138.09, 135.97, 132.43, 129.70, 128.70, 128.64, 128.55, 128.53, 128.08, 112.85, 54.55 ppm. HRMS (ESI, m/z) calculated for C17H15N2O2 [M+H]+: 279.1134, found: 279.1130. IR (neat): ν 3424, 2914, 1732 cm–1.

(Z)-6-(4-Fluorobenzylidene)-3-(2-hydroxyethyl)-3, 6-dihydro-2H-1, 3, 4-oxadiazin-2-one (2e). White solid (0.30 mmol scale, 52 mg, 69% yield). Rf = 0.3 (EtOAc/petroleum ether = 2:1). 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3): δ 7.67–7.63 (m, 2H), 7.21 (s, 1H), 7.03 (t, J = 8.7 Hz, 2H), 5.71 (s, 1H), 3.95–3.90 (m, 4H), 2.63 (s, 1H) ppm. 13C NMR (101 MHz, CDCl3): δ 162.54 (d, J = 251.49 Hz), 144.43, 140.77, 137.93, 131.54 (d, J = 8.1 Hz), 128.57 (d, J = 4.1 Hz), 115.75 (d, J = 22.2 Hz), 111.77, 60.29, 53.02 ppm. HRMS (ESI, m/z) calculated for C12H11FN2NaO3 [M+Na]+: 273.0651, found: 273.0652. IR (neat): ν 3430, 2921, 1720 cm–1.

(Z)-6-(4-Chlorobenzylidene)-3-(2-hydroxyethyl)-3, 6-dihydro-2H-1, 3, 4-oxadiazin-2-one (2f). White solid (0.30 mmol scale, 61 mg, 76% yield). Rf = 0.3 (EtOAc/petroleum ether = 2:1). 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3): δ 7.61 (d, J = 8.4 Hz, 2H), 7.32 (d, J = 8.3 Hz, 2H), 7.23 (s, J = 10.0 Hz, 1H), 5.72 (s, 1H), 3.96–3.94 (m, 4H), 2.37 (s, 1H) ppm. 13C NMR (126 MHz, CDCl3): δ 144.31, 141.47, 137.79, 134.60, 130.88, 130.85, 128.96, 111.76, 60.61, 53.16 ppm. HRMS (ESI, m/z) calculated for C12H12ClN2O3 [M+H]+: 267.0536, found: 267.0533. IR (neat): ν 3358, 2923, 1656 cm–1.

(Z)-3-(2-Hydroxyethyl)-6-(4-methylbenzylidene)-3, 6-dihydro-2H-1, 3, 4-oxadiazin-2-one (2g). White solid (0.30 mmol scale, 52 mg, 71% yield). Rf = 0.4 (EtOAc/petroleum ether = 2:1). 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3): δ 7.58 (d, J = 8.1 Hz, 2H), 7.21 (s, 1H), 7.17 (d, J = 8.0 Hz, 2H), 5.74 (s, 1H), 3.96–3.93 (m, 4H), 2.53 (s, 1H), 2.35 (s, 3H) ppm. 13C NMR (101 MHz, CDCl3) δ 144.71, 140.60, 139.06, 138.26, 129.69, 129.53, 129.41, 113.25, 60.51, 52.99, 21.37 ppm. HRMS (ESI, m/z) calculated for C13H15N2O3 [M+H]+: 247.1083, found: 247.1077. IR (neat): ν 3430, 3054, 1728, 1464 cm–1.

(Z)-3-(2-Hydroxyethyl)-6-(4-methoxybenzylidene)-3, 6-dihydro-2H-1, 3, 4-oxadiazin-2-one (2h). White solid (0.30 mmol scale, 63 mg, 80% yield). Rf = 0.4 (EtOAc/petroleum ether = 2:1). 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3): δ 7.67 (d, J = 8.8 Hz, 2H), 7.22 (s, 1H), 6.91 (d, J = 8.8 Hz, 2H), 5.76 (s, 1H), 3.99–3.96 (m, 4H), 3.84 (s, 3H) ppm. 13C NMR (101 MHz, CDCl3): δ 159.99, 144.84, 139.83, 138.42, 131.39, 125.14, 114.21, 113.11, 60.77, 55.29, 52.99 ppm. HRMS (ESI, m/z) calculated for C13H15N2O4 [M+H]+: 263.1032, found: 263.1028. IR (neat): ν 3437, 3065, 1719, 1594, 1275 cm–1.

(Z)-3-(2-Hydroxyethyl)-6-pentylidene-3, 6-dihydro-2H-1, 3, 4-oxadiazin-2-one (2i). Colorless liquid (0.30 mmol scale, 50 mg, 78% yield). Rf = 0.4 (EtOAc/petroleum ether = 2:1). 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3): δ 7.08 (s, 1H), 5.05–5.01 (m, 1H), 3.93–3.88 (m, 4H), 2.23–2.19 (m, 2H), 1.40–1.30 (m, 4H), 0.91–0.87 (m, 3H) ppm. 13C NMR (101 MHz, CDCl3): δ 145.57, 141.77, 137.51, 116.17, 60.26, 52.68, 30.56, 23.75, 22.16, 13.66 ppm. HRMS (ESI, m/z) calculated for C10H17N2O3 [M+H]+: 213.1239, found: 213.1235. IR (neat): ν 3448, 2956, 1724, 1654 cm–1.

(Z)-6-Hexylidene-3-(2-hydroxyethyl)-3, 6-dihydro-2H-1, 3, 4-oxadiazin-2-one (2j). Colorless liquid (0.30 mmol scale, 53 mg, 78% yield). Rf = 0.4 (EtOAc/petroleum ether = 2:1). 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3): δ 7.06 (s, 1H), 5.01 (t, J = 7.8 Hz, 1H), 3.85 (s, 4H), 2.73 (s, 1H), 2.20–2.14 (m, 2H), 1.39–1.24 (m, J = 44.2 Hz, 6H), 0.85 (t, J = 6.9 Hz, 3H) ppm. 13C NMR (101 MHz, CDCl3): δ 145.58, 141.76, 137.53, 116.26, 60.33, 52.68, 31.26, 28.13, 24.02, 22.26, 13.82 ppm. HRMS (ESI, m/z) calculated for C11H19N2O3 [M+H]+: 227.1396, found: 227.1386. IR (neat): ν 3440, 2926, 1724, 1652 cm–1.

(Z)-6-(5-Chloropentylidene)-3-(2-hydroxyethyl)-3, 6-dihydro-2H-1, 3, 4-oxadiazin-2-one (2k). White solid (0.30 mmol scale, 55 mg, 75% yield). Rf = 0.3 (EtOAc/petroleum ether = 2:1). 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3): δ 7.09 (s, 1H), 5.01 (t, J = 7.8 Hz, 1H), 3.87 (s, 4H), 3.52 (t, J = 6.5 Hz, 2H), 2.58 (s, 1H), 2.26–2.21 (m, 2H), 1.81–1.52 (m, 4H) ppm. 13C NMR (101 MHz, CDCl3): δ 145.43, 142.18, 137.31, 115.00, 60.41, 52.76, 44.54, 31.88, 25.73, 23.32 ppm. HRMS (ESI, m/z) calculated for C10H16ClN2O3 [M+H]+: 247.0849, found: 247.0845. IR (neat): ν 3450, 2935, 1727, 1654 cm–1.

(Z)-3-(2-Hydroxyethyl)-6-(2-phenoxyethylidene)-3, 6-dihydro-2H-1, 3, 4-oxadiazin-2-one (2l). White solid (0.30 mmol scale, 45 mg, 57% yield). Rf = 0.3 (EtOAc/petroleum ether = 2:1). 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3): δ 7.32–7.27 (m, 2H), 7.18 (s, 1H), 6.99–6.89 (m, 3H), 5.30 (t, J = 6.4 Hz, 1H), 4.78 (d, J = 6.4 Hz, 2H), 3.95–3.91 (m, 4H), 2.02 (s, 1H) ppm. 13C NMR (126 MHz, CDCl3): δ 157.92, 144.58, 142.70, 136.26, 129.56, 121.28, 114.56, 109.90, 60.79, 60.40, 53.08 ppm. HRMS (ESI, m/z) calculated for C13H14N2NaO4 [M+Na]+: 285.0851, found: 285.0851. IR (neat): ν 3408, 2924, 1737, 1236 cm–1.

(Z)-6-Benzylidene-3, 6-dihydro-2H-1, 3, 4-oxadiazin-2-one (5a). Pale white solid (0.30 mmol scale, 47 mg, 83% yield). Rf = 0.3 (EtOAc/petroleum ether = 1:2). 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3): δ 8.17 (s, 1H), 7.71 (d, J = 7.6 Hz, 2H), 7.41–7.31 (m, 3H), 7.24 (s, 1H), 5.85 (s, 1H) ppm. 13C NMR (126 MHz, CDCl3): δ 154.38, 149.91, 143.79, 141.00, 138.09, 132.15, 129.88, 128.99, 128.75, 114.15 ppm. HRMS (ESI, m/z) calculated for C10H9N2O2 [M+H]+: 189.0664, found: 189.0654. IR (neat): ν 2921, 1727, 1630 cm–1.

(Z)-6-(4-Fluorobenzylidene)-3, 6-dihydro-2H-1, 3, 4-oxadiazin-2-one (5b). White solid (0.30 mmol scale, 54 mg, 87% yield). Rf = 0.3 (EtOAc/petroleum ether = 1:2). 1H NMR (500 MHz, CDCl3): δ 8.15 (s, 1H), 7.72–7.69 (m, 2H), 7.22 (s, 1H), 7.09–7.06 (m, 2H), 5.81 (s, 1H) ppm. 13C NMR (126 MHz, CDCl3): δ 162.77 (d, J = 252 Hz), 143.65, 140.67, 137.95, 131.77 (d, J = 7.6 Hz)), 128.44, (d, J = 3.8 Hz), 115.90 (d, J = 22.7 Hz), 112.75 ppm. HRMS (ESI, m/z) calculated for C10H6FN2O2 [M–H]: 205.0413, found: 205.0420. IR (neat): ν 2925, 1729, 1590 cm–1.

(Z)-6-(4-Chlorobenzylidene)-3, 6-dihydro-2H-1, 3, 4-oxadiazin-2-one (5c). White solid (0.30 mmol scale, 53 mg, 79% yield). Rf = 0.3 (EtOAc/petroleum ether = 1:2). 1H NMR (500 MHz, CDCl3): δ 8.05 (s, 1H), 7.64 (d, J = 8.5 Hz, 2H), 7.35 (d, J = 8.6 Hz, 2H), 7.23 (s, 1H), 5.80 (s, 1H) ppm. 13C NMR (126 MHz, CDCl3): δ 143.40, 141.28, 137.79, 134.83, 131.02, 130.67, 129.02, 112.63 ppm. HRMS (ESI, m/z) calculated for C10H6ClN2O2 [M–H]: 221.0118, found: 221.0131. IR (neat): ν 2933, 1737, 1599 cm–1.

(Z)-6-(4-Methylbenzylidene)-3, 6-dihydro-2H-1, 3, 4-oxadiazin-2-one (5d). White solid (0.30 mmol scale, 52 mg, 85% yield). Rf = 0.3 (EtOAc/petroleum ether = 1:2). 1H NMR (500 MHz, CDCl3): δ 8.19 (s, 1H), 7.61 (d, J = 8.1 Hz, 2H), 7.21–7.18 (m, 3H), 5.82 (s, 1H), 2.37 (s, 3H) ppm. 13C NMR (126 MHz, CDCl3): δ 144.03, 140.47, 139.32, 138.25, 129.86, 129.50, 129.40, 114.13, 21.44 ppm. HRMS (ESI, m/z) calculated for C11H9N2O2 [M–H]: 201.0664, found: 201.0679. IR (neat): ν 2924, 1763, 1616 cm–1.

(Z)-6-(4-Methoxybenzylidene)-3, 6-dihydro-2H-1, 3, 4-oxadiazin-2-one (5e). Pale white solid (0.30 mmol scale, 41 mg, 63% yield). Rf = 0.2 (EtOAc/petroleum ether = 1:2). 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3): δ 8.02 (s, 1H), 7.67 (d, J = 8.6 Hz, 2H), 7.19 (s, 1H), 6.91 (d, J = 8.6 Hz, 2H), 5.80 (s, 1H), 3.84 (s, 3H) ppm. 13C NMR (101 MHz, CDCl3): δ 160.12, 144.07, 139.68, 138.35, 131.53, 124.97, 114.24, 113.86, 55.32 ppm. HRMS (ESI, m/z) calculated for C11H9N2O3 [M–H]: 217.0613, found: 217.0625. IR (neat): ν 2930, 1755, 1611, 1147 cm–1.

(Z)-6-(Biphenylmethylene)-3, 6-dihydro-2H-1, 3, 4-oxadiazin-2-one (5f). White solid (0.30 mmol scale, 49 mg, 62% yield). Rf = 0.3 (EtOAc/petroleum ether = 1:2). 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3): δ 8.05 (s, 1H), 7.79 (d, J = 8.1 Hz, 2H), 7.64–7.61 (m, 5H), 7.48–7.35 (m, 3H), 5.89 (s, 1H) ppm. 13C NMR (101 MHz, CDCl3): δ 143.71, 141.59, 141.05, 140.19, 138.09, 131.19, 130.35, 128.88, 127.74, 127.34, 127.01, 113.66 ppm. HRMS (ESI, m/z) calculated for C16H11N2O2 [M–H]: 263.0821, found: 263.0834. IR (neat): ν 2922, 1738, 1635 cm–1.

(Z)-6-(Cyclohexylmethylene)-3, 6-dihydro-2H-1, 3, 4-oxadiazin-2-one (5g). White solid (0.30 mmol scale, 40 mg, 69% yield). Rf = 0.3 (EtOAc/petroleum ether = 1:2). 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3): δ 8.10 (s, 1H), 7.03 (s, 1H), 4.94 (d, J = 9.6 Hz, 1H), 2.61–2.59 (m, 1H), 1.72–1.61 (m, 14.0 Hz, 5H), 1.34–1.28 (m, 2H), 1.20–1.09 (m, 3H) ppm. 13C NMR (101 MHz, CDCl3): δ 145.10, 140.28, 137.75, 122.46, 33.39, 32.09, 25.77, 25.41 ppm. HRMS (ESI, m/z) calculated for C10H13N2O2 [M–H]: 193.0977, found: 193.0987. IR (neat): ν 2930, 1762, 1242 cm–1.

(Z)-6-Hexylidene-3, 6-dihydro-2H-1, 3, 4-oxadiazin-2-one (5h). White solid (0.30 mmol scale, 39 mg, 71% yield). Rf = 0.3 (EtOAc/petroleum ether = 1:4). 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3): δ 8.63 (s, 1H), 7.07 (s, 1H), 5.08 (t, J = 7.7 Hz, 1H), 2.21 (q, J = 7.4 Hz, 2H), 1.43–1.29 (m, 6H), 0.88 (t, J = 6.3 Hz, 3H) ppm. 13C NMR (101 MHz, CDCl3): δ 145.37, 141.65, 137.52, 117.10, 31.32, 28.18, 24.02, 22.34, 13.91 ppm. HRMS (ESI, m/z) calculated for C9H13N2O2 [M–H]: 181.0977, found: 181.0988. IR (neat): ν 2924, 1747, 1659 cm–1.

(Z)-6-(4-Chlorobutylidene)-3, 6-dihydro-2H-1, 3, 4-oxadiazin-2-one (5i). White solid (0.30 mmol scale, 33 mg, 54% yield). Rf = 0.3 (EtOAc/petroleum ether = 1:4). 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3): δ 8.39 (s, 1H), 7.09 (s, 1H), 5.09 (t, J = 7.8 Hz, 1H), 3.55 (t, J = 6.6 Hz, 2H), 2.40 (q, J = 7.6 Hz, 2H), 1.91 (p, J = 6.9 Hz, 2H) ppm. 13C NMR (101 MHz, CDCl3): δ 144.79, 142.45, 137.09, 114.50, 44.04, 31.28, 21.60 ppm. HRMS (ESI, m/z) calculated for C7H8ClN2O2 [M–H]: 187.0274, found: 187.0290. IR (neat): ν 2930, 1747, 1659, 1059 cm–1.

3 Results and discussion
3.1 Optimization of reaction conditions

Alkynic hydrazones were firstly synthesized by the reaction of alkynals with hydrazines according to reported procedures [35]. In an initial investigation, alkynic aryl hydrazone was found to react with CO2 to give very low yields of the cyclization product under different reaction conditions due to the low nucleophilic reactivity of the nitrogen atom. As a consequence, phenylpropynal 2-hydroxyethylhydrazone (1a) was chosen as the model substrate for the reaction with CO2 to identify the optimal conditions (Table 1).

Table 1
Optimization of the reaction conditions for the carboxylative cyclization of alkynic hydrazones with CO2

Considering that silver(I) salts can function as an effective π-Lewis acid catalyst for alkyne activation in carboxylation and other reactions [36-41], various silver-based catalytic systems were screened. The reaction of 1a with 2 MPa CO2 using 5 mol% AgOAc as the catalyst and 1.5 equivalent Cs2CO3 as the base in DMSO at 25 ℃ was found to readily afford the carboxylative cyclization product 3, 6-dihydro-2H-1, 3, 4-oxadiazin -2-one (2a) in 87% isolated yield (Table 1, entry 1). It should be noted that the geometry of the C=N bond in hydrazone substrates had no effect on the reactivity, probably due to the rapid conversion of the two isomers Z-1a and E-1a. The structural assignment of the isolated product was further confirmed by single-crystal X-ray analysis of 2a [42]. As shown in Fig. 1, the newly formed C=C bond in the product exhibits Z configuration, the typical structure obtained from Ag-catalyzed electrophilic cyclizations. Other silver(I) salts such as AgI, AgBF4, Ag2CO3, and AgNO3 displayed inferior catalytic performance than AgOAc (see SI). CuI showed lower catalytic activity than AgOAc (entry 2), while Pd(OAc)2 afforded no carboxylated product and 1a was fully recovered (entry 3). The replacement of Cs2CO3 with K2CO3 or CsF resulted in a slight decrease in the yield of 2a (entries 4 and 5). Although DBU is frequently employed as an efficient base in many carboxylation reactions using CO2, only 30% yield of 2a was obtained when applied as the base (entry 6). Switching the base to KOtBu and NaH led to the exclusive formation of the non-carboxylative cyclization product pyrazole 3a (entries 7 and 8) [35, 43]. The CO2 pressure had an obvious effect on the reaction. A lower yield of 2a was obtained when the reaction was conducted at low CO2 pressure (entry 9). The reaction did not proceed in the absence of CO2, indicating that the carbonyl moiety in the resulting product originates from CO2 rather than from the carbonate base (entry 10). Interestingly, 2a in 75% yield was still obtained in the absence of a base (entry 11), implying that hydrazone 1a itself may serve as a base in this process. To maintain the high efficiency of the reaction, a catalytic amount of base was added. The presence of 5 mol% Cs2CO3 was enough to achieve 85% yield of 2a (entry 11), which is comparable to the result using stoichiometric bases (entries 1 and 4). No product was observed in the absence of the catalyst, confirming the catalytic role of the silver(I) salt (entry 12). Finally, further screening experiments revealed DMSO as the optimal solvent for this reaction (see SI).

Fig. 1. Thermal ellipsoid plot for product 2a
3.2 Substrate scope

Under the optimized reaction conditions, the scope of the silver-catalyzed carboxylative cyclization with regard to alkynic hydrazone substrates was investigated (Table 2). In addition to phenylpropynal 2-hydroxyethylhydrazone (1a), other N-alkyl substituted hydrazones such as 2-cyanoethylhydrazone (1b), isopropylhydrazone (1c), and benzylhydrazone (1d) were found to be suitable substrates for this reaction. Arylpropynal 2-hydroxyethylhydrazones bearing various functional groups including electron-withdrawing (fluoro, chloro) and electron-donating (methyl, methoxyl) substituents reacted smoothly to afford the corresponding 3, 6-dihydro-2H-1, 3, 4-oxadiazin-2-ones (2e2h) in good yield. Alkyl-substituted propynal 2-hydroxyethylhydrazones 1i1l participated efficiently in the carboxylative cyclization reaction furnishing the corresponding products in moderate to good yield.

Table 2
Silver-catalyzed carboxylative cyclization of substituted alkynic hydrazones with CO2

Since nitrogen heterocycles in medicinal compounds frequently present NH moieties, many synthetic processes involve redundant nitrogen protection/deprotection steps. Therefore, carboxylative cyclization reactions of propynal hydrazone substrates 4 to give directly N-unsubstituted products 5 were then examined (Table 3). Using the same reaction conditions to those applied to N-substituted hydrazone substrates 1, substrates 4 containing electron-withdrawing or electron-donating aryl and alkyl substituents on the alkyne moiety furnished the desired products 5 in satisfactory yield. The geometry of the newly formed C=C bonds in oxadiazinones 5 was also identified as that of Z isomers based on NOE experiments for products 5a and 5g (see SI).

Table 3
Silver-catalyzed carboxylative cyclization of alkynic hydrazones with CO2

This catalytic reaction is readily scalable for both types of substrates, as exemplified by the synthesis of 2a (83% yield) and 5a (85% yield) at gram scale with longer reaction times (Scheme 1). It should be mentioned that the isolated yield of 5a at 0.8 mmol scale (Scheme 1) was slightly higher than the yield obtained at 0.3 mmol scale (Table 3).

Scheme 1. Gram-scale reactions
3.3 Mechanistic studies

In addition to the control experiments in Table 1 illustrating the catalytic role of silver(I) salts and the need for CO2 in this reaction, the reaction of 4a with CO2 in DMSO-d6 was further examined to detect possible reactive intermediates by NMR spectroscopy.

As shown in Fig. 2, the 1H NMR spectrum of 4a saturated with atmospheric CO2 in DMSO-d6 (Fig. 2(a)) was found to be identical to that of 4a without CO2, implying that the formation of a carbazate intermediate in the absence of an external base is inefficient despite the hydrazone itself being able to act as a base. When a catalytic amount of Cs2CO3 was added to the reaction system, two obvious new signals appeared at 6.26 and 8.23 ppm, assigned to the carbazate intermediate (Fig. 2(b)). The amount of this species gradually increased to a 1:4 ratio relative to 4a (Fig. 2(c)). When 10 mol% of AgOAc was added to the reaction system, the signals for the carbazate intermediate and 4a began to disappear, while the signals of product 5a started to emerge (Fig. 2(d)). After 2 h, the hydrazone substrate was completely converted into the oxadiazinone product and no obvious signals for the carbazate intermediate were detected anymore (Fig. 2(e)).

Fig. 2. NMR studies of the reaction of 4a with CO2

On the basis of the above experiments, a plausible mechanism for this reaction is proposed in Scheme 2. The Z-isomer of the hydrazone substrate enters a productive catalytic cycle where it interacts with the base. The reaction of the NH moiety of the hydrazone with CO2 affords the reactive carbazate intermediate B. Then, the carboxylate oxygen atom conducts a nucleophilic attack on the silver(I)-activated alkyne moiety affording vinylic silver intermediate C. The following protonation reaction finally furnishes the carboxylative cyclization product, with concomitant regeneration of the catalyst and release of the base.

Scheme 2. Proposed mechanism
4 Conclusions

We have developed a silver(I)-catalyzed carboxylative cyclization of alkynic hydrazones under mild reaction conditions. Silver(I) salts show high activity in this reaction as π-Lewis acid catalysts for alkyne activation, and the use of catalytic amounts of a base such as cesium carbonate is sufficient to guarantee the rapid formation of the reactive carbazate intermediate. This reaction provides a highly efficient and convenient approach to synthesize biologically important 1, 3, 4-oxadiazin-2-one compounds in good yield using CO2 as the carboxylative reagent.

References
[1]
X. B. Lu, D. J. Darensbourg, Chem. Soc. Rev., 2012, 41, 1462-1484. DOI:10.1039/C1CS15142H
[2]
M. He, Y. Sun, B. Han, Angew. Chem. Int. Ed., 2013, 52, 9620-9633. DOI:10.1002/anie.201209384
[3]
C. Martin, G. Fiorani, A. W. Kleij, ACS Catal., 2015, 5, 1353-1370. DOI:10.1021/cs5018997
[4]
L. Wang, W. Sun, C. Liu, Chin. J. Chem., 2018, 36, 353-362. DOI:10.1002/cjoc.v36.4
[5]
J. Hao, W. Shi, Chin. J. Catal., 2018, 39, 1157-1166. DOI:10.1016/S1872-2067(18)63073-6
[6]
S. S. Yan, Q. Fu, L. L. Liao, G. Q. Sun, J. H. Ye, L. Gong, Y. Z. Bo-Xue, D. G. Yu, Coord. Chem. Rev., 2018, 374, 439-463. DOI:10.1016/j.ccr.2018.07.011
[7]
C. C. Yan, L. Lin, G. X. Wang, X. H. Bao, Chin. J. Catal., 2019, 40, 23-37. DOI:10.1016/S1872-2067(18)63161-4
[8]
A. Tortajada, F. Julia-Hernandez, M. Borjesson, T. Moragas, R. Martin, Angew. Chem. Int. Ed., 2018, 57, 15948-15982. DOI:10.1002/anie.201803186
[9]
F. Tan, G. Yin, Chin. J. Chem., 2018, 36, 545-554. DOI:10.1002/cjoc.v36.6
[10]
Q. Liu, L. Wu, R. Jackstell, M. Beller, Nat. Commun., 2015, 6, 5933. DOI:10.1038/ncomms6933
[11]
B. Yu, L. N. He, ChemSusChem, 2015, 8, 52-62. DOI:10.1002/cssc.201402837
[12]
S. Wang, C. Xi, Chem. Soc. Rev., 2019, 48, 382-404. DOI:10.1039/C8CS00281A
[13]
J. H. Ye, L. Song, W. J. Zhou, T. Ju, Z. B. Yin, S. S. Yan, Z. Zhang, J. Li, D. G. Yu, Angew. Chem. Int. Ed., 2016, 55, 10022-10026. DOI:10.1002/anie.201603352
[14]
M. Y. Wang, Y. Cao, X. Liu, N. Wang, L. N. He, S. H. Li, Green Chem., 2017, 19, 1240-1244. DOI:10.1039/C6GC03200A
[15]
S. Wang, X. Zhang, C. Cao, C. Chen, C. Xi, Green Chem., 2017, 19, 4515-4519. DOI:10.1039/C7GC01992K
[16]
B. A. Vara, T. J. Struble, W. Wang, M. C. Dobish, J. N. Johnston, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2015, 137, 7302-7305. DOI:10.1021/jacs.5b04425
[17]
J. Rintjema, R. Epping, G. Fiorani, E. Martin, E. C. Escudero-Adan, A. W. Kleij, Angew. Chem. Int. Ed., 2016, 55, 3972-3976. DOI:10.1002/anie.201511521
[18]
W. Y. Zhang, R. C. Luo, Q. H. Xu, Y. J. Chen, X. W. Lin, X. T. Zhou, H. B. Ji, Chin. J. Catal., 2017, 39, 736-744.
[19]
X. Fu, X. Jing, L. Jin, L. Zhang, X. Zhang, B. Hu, H. Jing, Chin. J. Catal., 2018, 39, 997-1003. DOI:10.1016/S1872-2067(18)63023-2
[20]
Q. W. Song, P. Liu, L. H. Han, K. Zhang, L. N. He, Chin. J. Chem., 2018, 36, 147-152. DOI:10.1002/cjoc.201700572
[21]
J. Hou, A. Ee, W. Feng, J. Xu, Y. Zhao, J. Wu, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2018, 140, 5257-5263. DOI:10.1021/jacs.8b01561
[22]
Z. Zhang, C. J. Zhu, M. Miao, J. L. Han, T. Ju, L. Song, J. H. Ye, J. Li, D. G. Yu, Chin. J. Chem., 2018, 36, 430-436. DOI:10.1002/cjoc.v36.5
[23]
L. Fu, S. Li, Z. Cai, Y. Ding, X. Guo, L. Zhou, D. Yuan, Q. Sun, G. Li, Nat. Catal., 2018, 1, 469-478. DOI:10.1038/s41929-018-0080-y
[24]
X. Gao, B. Yu, Z. Yang, Y. Zhao, H. Zhang, L. Hao, B. Han, Z. Liu, ACS Catal., 2015, 5, 6648-6652. DOI:10.1021/acscatal.5b01874
[25]
Z. Zhang, Q. Sun, C. Xia, W. Sun, Org. Lett., 2016, 18, 6316-6319. DOI:10.1021/acs.orglett.6b03030
[26]
D. Zhu, L. Fang, H. Han, Y. Wang, J. Xia, Org. Lett., 2017, 19, 4259-4262. DOI:10.1021/acs.orglett.7b01906
[27]
M. C. Forest, P. Lahouratate, M. Martin, G. Nadler, M. J. Quiniou, R. G. Zimmermann, J. Med. Chem., 1992, 35, 163-172. DOI:10.1021/jm00079a022
[28]
Y. Gohee, A. Boucherle, M. Robin, Eur. J. Med. Chem., 1986, 21, 403-409.
[29]
R. K. Boeckman Jr, P. Ge, J. E. Reed, Org. Lett., 2001, 3, 3647-3650. DOI:10.1021/ol0165645
[30]
R. M. Wilson, T. J. Chow, Tetrahedron Lett., 1983, 24, 4635-4636. DOI:10.1016/S0040-4039(00)86213-9
[31]
D. Geffken, F. K. Hansen, M. Khankischper, T. Mauz, R. Meurer, Synlett, 2012, 23, 637-639. DOI:10.1055/s-0031-1290160
[32]
C. X. Guo, W. Z. Zhang, N. Zhang, X. B. Lu, J. Org. Chem., 2017, 82, 7637-7642. DOI:10.1021/acs.joc.7b00963
[33]
W. Z. Zhang, N. Zhang, Y. Q. Sun, Y. W. Ding, X. B. Lu, ACS Catal., 2017, 7, 8072-8076. DOI:10.1021/acscatal.7b03000
[34]
W. Z. Zhang, H. L. Li, Y. Zeng, X. Y. Tao, X. B. Lu, Chin. J. Chem., 2018, 36, 112-118. DOI:10.1002/cjoc.201700581
[35]
M. Zora, A. Kivrak, C. Yazici, J. Org. Chem., 2011, 76, 6726-6742. DOI:10.1021/jo201119e
[36]
K. Sekine, T. Yamada, Chem. Soc. Rev., 2016, 45, 4524-4532. DOI:10.1039/C5CS00895F
[37]
G. Fang, X. Bi, Chem. Soc. Rev., 2015, 44, 8124-8173. DOI:10.1039/C5CS00027K
[38]
Q. Z. Zheng, N. Jiao, Chem. Soc. Rev., 2016, 45, 4590-4627. DOI:10.1039/C6CS00107F
[39]
Y. Sadamitsu, K. Komatsuki, K. Saito, T. Yamada, Org. Lett., 2017, 19, 3191-3194. DOI:10.1021/acs.orglett.7b01309
[40]
C. Qi, D. Yan, W. Xiong, H. Jiang, J. CO2 Util., 2018, 24, 120-127. DOI:10.1016/j.jcou.2017.12.013
[41]
W. Wang, Y. Fu, Y. Li, R. Yao, L. Liu, W. Chang, J. Li, Org. Chem. Front., 2018, 5, 3331-3335. DOI:10.1039/C8QO00978C
[42]
CCDC 1893129 contain the supplementary crystallographic data for product 2a. These data can be obtained free of charge via www.ccdc.cam.ac.uk/data_request/cif.
[43]
T. Kusakabe, H. Sagae, K. Kato, Org. Biomol. Chem., 2013, 11, 4943-4948. DOI:10.1039/c3ob40913a