催化学报  2019, Vol. 40 Issue (11): 1741-1748      DOI: S1872-2067(19)63348-6   PDF    
扩展功能
加入收藏夹
复制引文信息
加入引用管理器
Email Alert
RSS
本文作者相关文章
Erwin Lam
Kim Larmier
Shohei Tada
Patrick Wolf
Olga V. Safonova
Christophe Copéret
Zr(IV) surface sites determine CH3OH formation rate on Cu/ZrO2/SiO2-CO2 hydrogenation catalysts
Erwin Lama, Kim Larmiera,c, Shohei Tadaa,d, Patrick Wolfa, Olga V. Safonovab, Christophe Copéreta     
a. ETH Zürich, Department of Chemistry and Applied Biosciences, Vladimir-Prelog-Weg 1-5, CH 8093, Zürich, Switzerland;
b. Paul Scherrer Institute, CH-5232 Villigen, Switzerland;
c. IFP Energies Nouvelles, Rond-Point de l'échangeur de Solaize, BP3, 69360 Solaize, France;
d. Department of Chemical System Engineering, The University of Tokyo, 7-3-1 Hongo, Bunkyo-ku, 113-8656 Tokyo, Japan
* Corresponding author. Christophe Copéret, E-mail: ccoperet@ethz.ch
E.L., K.L., P.W., and S.T. are supported by the SCCER-Heat and Energy Storage program. We acknowledge PSI Super-XAS for beamtime and thank Dr. Maarten Nachtegaal (PSI) for assistance and ScopeM at ETH Zürich for the use of their electron microscopy facilities and Dr. Dmitry Lebedev (ETH) for TEM
Abstract: Cu/ZrO2/SiO2 are efficient catalysts for the selective hydrogenation of CO2 to CH3OH. In order to understand the role of ZrO2 in these mixed-oxides based catalysts, in situ X-ray absorption spectroscopy has been carried out on the Cu and Zr K-edge. Under reaction conditions, Cu remains metallic, while Zr is present in three types of coordination environment associated with 1) bulk ZrO2, 2) coordinatively saturated and 3) unsaturated Zr(IV) surface sites. The amount of coordinatively unsaturated Zr surface sites can be quantified by linear combination fit of reference X-Ray absorption near edge structure (XANES) spectra and its amount correlates with CH3OH formation rates, thus indicating the importance of Zr(IV) Lewis acid surface sites in driving the selectivity toward CH3OH. This finding is consistent with the proposed mechanism, where CO2 is hydrogenated at the interface between the Cu nanoparticles that split H2 and Zr(IV) surface sites that stabilizes reaction intermediates.
© 2019, Dalian Institute of Chemical Physics, Chinese Academy of Sciences.
Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
Key words: CO2 hydrogenation    ZrO2/SiO2 supported Cu nanoparticles    Lewis acidic surface sites    In situ X-ray absorption spectroscopy    
CO2加氢催化剂Cu/ZrO2/SiO2上Zr(IV)表面位对甲醇生成速率的影响
Erwin Lama, Kim Larmiera,c, Shohei Tadaa,d, Patrick Wolfa, Olga V. Safonovab, Christophe Copéreta     
a. 苏黎世联邦理工学院化学与应用生物科学系, CH-8093 苏黎世, 瑞士;
b. 保罗谢尔研究所, CH-5232 菲利根, 瑞士;
c. 法国国际石油研究所, 69360 索莱兹, 法国;
d. 东京大学化工系统工程系, 113-8656 东京, 日本
摘要:Cu/ZrO2/SiO2是有效的CO2选择加氢制甲醇催化剂.为了理解混合氧化物基催化剂中ZrO2的作用,在Cu和Zr的K边进行了原位X-射线吸收光谱测试.在反应条件下,Cu保持金属态,而Zr以三类配位环境的形式存在:体相ZrO2,配位饱和的、以及不饱和的Zr(IV)表面位.配位不饱和Zr表面位可通过线性拟合参比的X射线吸收近边结构光谱进行定量,发现其数量与甲醇生成速率有关,因而表明Zr(IV)Lewis酸表面位在驱动选择生成甲醇反应中的重要性.这与提出的机理是一致的:在裂解H2的Cu纳米颗粒与稳定反应中间体的Zr(IV)表面位之间的界面上进行CO2加氢.
关键词CO2加氢    ZrO2/SiO2负载的Cu纳米颗粒    Lewis酸表面位    原位X射线吸收光谱    

1 Introduction

The hydrogenation of CO2 to CH3OH is a promising approach to mitigate the increasing amount of CO2 in the atmosphere and to incorporate CO2 into a carbon cycle by using renewable H2 derived from intermittent excess energy coming from wind and solar power [1-7]. Copper-based catalysts promoted by ZnO or ZrO2 are typically preferred because of their superior catalytic performances compared to other metals in addition to the relatively large availability and cheap price of Cu [3, 6], while alternative catalysts have also been reported for the hydrogenation of CO2 to CH3OH consisting of different metals and/or alloys such as Pd/ZnO, Pd-Cu/SiO2 or Ni5Ga3/SiO2 as well as systems without any metals in their metallic form as in the case of In2O3/ZrO2 or ZnO-ZrO2 [8-12]. Catalysts consisting of copper nanoparticles supported on ZrO2 or ZrO2/SiO2 [13‒24], are promising due to their high selectivity for CH3OH vs. CO. The origin of this improved selectivity has been discussed over the years; with proposals ranging from Lewis acidic Zr(IV) sites, formation of oxygen vacancies associated to formation of Zr(III) sites, or electronic charge transfer between Cu and Zr [14, 19, 25-27]. Thus, the exact role of Zr to mediate CH3OH synthesis is still under debate. We have recently shown by a combined computational and experimental approach that the role of ZrO2 in Cu/ZrO2 is to provide Lewis acidic Zr(IV) surface sites that helps with the stabilization and the conversion of reaction intermediates to CH3OH [19]. In parallel, it was also shown that these interfacial sites have a positive influence on the catalytic conversion of ethanol to ethyl acetate on Cu-ZrO2 [28]. Moreover, we have recently shown that Cu nanoparticles supported on silica doped with isolated Zr(IV) surface sites, prepared by a Surface Organometallic-Thermolytic precursor approach [29-31], obey the same principle: the Zr(IV) ions, likely situated at the periphery of Cu nanoparticles, drives the selective hydrogenation of CO2 to CH3OH [24].

We therefore reasoned that the presence of Zr surface sites are likely involved in the selective hydrogenation of CO2 to CH3OH in Cu/ZrO2/SiO2 mixed oxides and have thus investigated this system by in situ X-ray absorption spectroscopy (XAS). Furthermore, the use of high surface area SiO2, which is considered as an inert support compared to ZrO2, allows for the formation of mixed oxides with varying Zr loadings and a high surface Zr density. Here we show a direct connection between CH3OH activity with the number of under-coordinated Zr surface sites, further pointing to the role of Lewis surface sites in the promotion of Cu/Zr-based CH3OH synthesis catalysts.

2 Experimental
2.1 General

SiC (FisherEU), CuCl (Acros Organics), LiOtBu (Aldrich-Fine Chemicals), and ZrO(NO3)2 hydrate (Aldrich-Fine Chemicals), CaH2 (Aldrich-Fine Chemicals) were used as received. Monoclinic ZrO2 was obtained from Daiichi Kigenso Kagaku Kogyo Co. Pentane was purified over two solvent purification alumina columns (MBraun) and degassed prior to use. H2 for catalysts preparation was purified over activated R3-11 BASF catalyst and activated 4 Å molecular sieves. SiO2 (AEROSIL 200) was purchased from Evonik. Pyridine (Across Organics) was dried over CaH2 and degassed prior to use. Unless otherwise specified all preparations of catalysts were carried out under argon using standard Schlenk techniques and gloveboxes. [Cu(OtBu)]4[32] and Cu/SiO2 [19] were synthesized according to literature procedure and stored in an argon filled glovebox. All the details concerning material characterization, catalytic testing and X-ray absorption spectroscopy are similar to Ref. [24] and repeated here for the sake of clarity.

2.2 Preparation ZrO2/SiO2 (SZxO)

SiO2 was impregnated with an aqueous solution of ZrO(NO3)2·xH2O 1 mL g‒1 corresponding to the porous volume of SiO2, dried at room temperature, prior to calcination under a flow of synthetic air at 500 ℃ for 12 h (60 ℃ h‒1), evacuated hot under high vacuum and stored in an argon filled glovebox. The Zr loading was controlled by the concentration of the ZrO(NO3)2 solution.

2.3 Representative procedure for supported copper nanoparticle synthesis.

A solution of [Cu(OtBu)]4 (220 mg, 0.4 mmol) in 20 mL of pentane was added to 2 g of the ZrO2/SiO2 mixed oxide (SZxO) wetted with pentane. The suspension was stirred for 4 hours, washed three times with pentane (5 mL) and dried at 10‒5 mbar for 1 h. The solid was then reduced under H2 at 500 ℃ for 5 h (100 ℃ h‒1) cooled down to room temperature under H2, evacuated under high vacuum (10‒5 mbar) and stored in an argon filled glovebox.

2.4 Material characterization

Elemental analyses of all materials were performed by the Mikroanalytisches Labor Pascher, Remagen, Germany. Powder X-ray diffraction (pXRD) patterns were recorded on a PANalytical X'Pert PRO-MPD diffractometer at a voltage of 40 kV and a current of 40 mA by applying Cu-Kα radiation (λ = 1.54060 Å) or on a STADI P diffractometer in transmission mode equipped with a Mythen 1K detector (DECTRIS) using Cu-Kα radiation (λ = 1.54060 Å). Catalyst morphology was obtained by transmission electron microscopy (TEM) on a Hitachi HT7700 or a Talos F200X microscope within the facilities of ScopeM at ETH Zurich. For the determination of the particle size distribution, an average of at least 100 individual particles were considered, and the mean particle size and standard deviation are given according to a lognormal distribution function. Fourier-Transform Infrared (FTIR) spectroscopy experiments were performed on self-supporting wafers using a Bruker Alpha FT-IR spectrometer in transmission mode (24 scans, 4 cm‒1 resolution) under exclusion of air. Intensities were normalized to the Si-O-Si overtones from the silica. The specific surface area of the catalysts was measured from a N2 physisorption isotherm recorded at 77 K on a BEL JAPAN BELSORP-mini II apparatus. The samples were degassed at 300 ℃ under vacuum (10‒3 mbar) for 3 h prior to measurement. The data was analyzed by the BET method with a p/p0 range between 0.1 and 0.3. Copper surface area was determined by N2O titration. In a typical experiment 30‒50 mg of the sample were weight into a U-shape quartz tube and connected to the instrument (BEL Japan, INC., BELCAT-B). Prior to analysis, the samples were pretreated under a flow of 50% H2/He at 300 ℃ for 2 h, after which 25‒30 successive pulses of the titration gas mixture (1% N2O in He) were introduced by a calibrated injection valve (2.77 μLN2O (stp) per pulse). The amount of N2O consumed is determined by monitoring the amounts of N2O and N2 in the exhaust with a thermal conductivity detector. The quantity of surface copper is then determined assuming the titration equation:

Pyridine adsorption experiments were performed on a self-supporting pellet of the Cu-based catalysts and monitored by infrared spectroscopy. After exposure of pyridine in the gas phase, the pellet was subsequently placed under high vacuum (10‒5 mbar) at room temperature (rt), 100, 200, 300 and 400 ℃ (300 ℃ min‒1) for 15 min. prior to measurement of the IR spectrum.

2.5 X-ray absorption spectroscopy (XAS)

X-ray absorption spectra at the Cu and Zr K-edge were measured at the SuperXAS beamline at the Swiss Light Source (SLS). The SLS is operating in top-up mode at a 2.4 GeV electron energy and a current of 400 mA. The incident photon beam provided by a 2.9 T super bend magnet source was selected by a Si(111) quick-EXAFS monochromator [34] and the rejection of higher harmonics and focusing were achieved by a silicon (for Cu K-edge) or a rhodium-coated (for Zr K-edge) collimating mirror at 2.5 mrad. During the measurements the monochromator was rotating with 10 Hz frequency and XAS spectra were collected in transmission mode using ionization chambers specially developed for quick data collection with 1 MHz frequency [34]. The resulting spectra were averaged over 5 min. Calibration of the monochromator energy position was performed by setting the inflection point of a Cu or Zr foil spectrum recorded simultaneously with the sample to 8979 or 17998 eV for Cu or Zr K-edges, respectively.

In a typical in situ experiment, about 10‒20 mg of the powder sample was packed into a 3-mm thick quartz capillary (0.1 mm wall thickness), which was connected with a pressurizable gas flow system. The catalysts were reduced under a H2/N2 mixture (15%, 1 bar) at 300 ℃ for 60 min, and then cooled down to reaction temperature (230 ℃). The reduction gas was flushed with N2 for 15 min and then changed to the reaction gas mixture (CO2:H2:N2 = 1:3:1). Under reaction gas, the set-up was pressurized to 5 bar using a back-pressure regulator before recording the spectra. The spectra were background-corrected and normalized using the Demeter software package. References (ZrO2, CuO and Cu2O) were mixed with cellulose, pressed into wafers and sealed in kapton tape.

2.6 Catalytic testing in CO2 hydrogenation

CO2 hydrogenation reactions were conducted in a fixed-bed tubular reactor (9.1 mm ID) in down-flow configuration (PID Eng & Tech). In a typical experiment 250 mg of catalyst powder oxidized in air was mixed with 5.0 g of SiC and loaded in the reactor under ambient conditions. First, the catalyst was reduced for 1 h under a flow of 15% H2/N2 (50 mL min‒1) at 300 ℃ and atmospheric pressure. After cooling down to 270 ℃ a flow of CO2:H2:N2 (1:3:1, 50 mL min-1) at 25 bar was passed through the catalyst for 3 h to ensure steady-state thereafter. The reactor was then set to measurement conditions (230 ℃, 25 bar) and the gas phase was analyzed via online gas chromatography (Agilent 7890B) equipped with an FID for CH3OH, CH3OCH3 and TCD for N2, CO2, CO and CH4. Different contact times were probed by changing the gas flow rate from 100 mL (STP) min‒1 to as low as 6 mL (STP) min‒1. Finally, activity data was collected at the initial flow rate of 100 mL min‒1 to check for potential deactivation of the catalyst. The reaction rates, conversions and selectivities were calculated using the following set of Eqs. (1‒4):

(1)
(2)
(3)
(4)

where Fin is the total gas inlet flowrate (mol h‒1), Fout is the total gas outlet flow rate (mol h‒1), Cx, in is the inlet gas fraction of species x, rCu, x is the formation rates of species x per gram copper , mcat is the mass of catalyst in the reactor (gcat), wCu the weight loading of copper (wtCu%), Sx the product based selectivity of product x, Fi, out the flowrates of the products, and XCO2 the conversion of CO2. Intrinsic formation rates (with respect to the contact time) and selectivity (with respect to CO2 conversion) are obtained by using a second order polynomial fit on the experimental data.

3 Results and discussion

Mixed oxide ZrO2/SiO2 supports with different Zr loadings are prepared by incipient wetness impregnation of silica (SiO2) with a ZrO(NO3)2 solution, followed by calcination at 500 ℃. Reaction of [Cu(OtBu)]4 with the surface Si-OH and Zr-OH groups on the calcined mixed oxide support allows the formation of grafted copper complexes as evidenced by the consumption of Si-OH (3745 cm‒1) and Zr-OH groups (3790 cm‒1) and the appearance of C‒H stretches (around 3000 cm‒1) in the infrared spectra (Figs. S1‒S4). Subsequent reduction under H2 at 500 ℃ removes all the organic ligands and leads to the reappearance of Si-OH and Zr-OH groups (Figs. S1‒S4) yielding supported copper nanoparticles on the ZrO2-SiO2 mixed oxide supports (Fig. 1) denoted as Cu/SZxO (with x corresponding to the weight loading of Zr). Catalysts consisting of Zr loadings ranging from 1 wt% to 9wt% and a Cu loading of around 4 wt% are generated (Tables 1 and S1) according to inductively coupled plasma optical emission spectrometry (ICP-OES). In all cases, small and narrowly distributed copper nanoparticles of around 2‒4 nm (Figs. 1(b) and S5‒S6) are formed according to transmission electron microscopy (TEM). Chemisorption experiments of the Cu surface sites using N2O also show similar amounts of Cu surface sites of ca. 63 μmol g‒1 for Cu/SZxO (x = 1 and 2) (Tables 1 and S1), confirming the similar copper dispersion; the Zr loading being the only varying parameter. Such data are similar to what is observed for Cu supported on SiO2, ZrO2, and isolated Zr(IV) surface sites on SiO2 prepared by the same approach [19, 32, 33]. Powder XRD shows no presence of crystalline Cu and Zr phases consistent with a high dispersion of both Cu and ZrO2 at low Zr loading (Fig. S7).

Fig. 1. (a) Schematic representation of grafting and reduction of [Cu(OtBu)]4 on SZxO for generating Cu nanoparticles. (b) Particle size distribution and TEM images of Cu/SZ1O (left) and Cu/SZ2O (right).
Table 1
Physicochemical properties of the prepared copper-based catalysts Cu/SZxO (x = 1 or 2) vs. reported Cu/ZrO2 and Cu/Zr0.9@SiO2.

The existence of similar physicochemical properties for all samples allow to directly study the effect of the support, namely the Zr loading. These catalysts are tested in CO2 hydrogenation in a fixed bed plug-flow reactor at 230 ℃ and 25 bar using a CO2:H2:N2 ratio of 1:3:1 at different contact times, generating CH3OH and CO as main reaction products (Table 2). Extrapolating the conversion to 0% show selectivities toward CH3OH of 78% and 83% for Cu/SZ1O and Cu/SZ2O, respectively, similarly to what is obtained for Cu/ZrO2 (68%) [19]. The intrinsic formation rates of CH3OH normalized by the mass of copper are 1.47 and 1.32 g h‒1 gCu‒1 for Cu/SZ1O and Cu/SZ2O, respectively and thus decreases slightly with higher Zr content (Cu/SZ2O) (Table 2). By comparison, the intrinsic CO formation rates are 0.51 and 0.38 g h‒1 gCu‒1 for Cu/SZ1O and Cu/SZ2O, respectively, in relation to the observed selectivities. Noteworthily the CH3OH formation rates decrease at longer contact times for all Cu/SZxO catalysts, indicating inhibition of CH3OH formation at higher conversion (Fig. S8). In addition, the mixed oxide catalysts with higher Zr loading that show similar physicochemical properties (Table S1) do not lead to further enhancement in CH3OH activity (Table S2). The tested catalysts show no deactivation after 2 days of reaction (Figs. S9 and S10) and similar particle size distributions of the spent catalyst is obtained according to TEM, while the Cu surface sites determined by N2O chemisorption slightly decrease (Table 1, Table S1 and Figs. S5‒S6 and S11‒S12). Overall the prepared catalysts show to be selective toward CH3OH in line with the previous results on Cu/ZrO2/SiO2 and Cu/ZrO2 based CO2 hydrogenation catalysts [14, 19, 24].

Table 2
Catalytic activity data in the hydrogenation of CO2 of copper-based catalysts Cu/SZxO vs. reported Cu/ZrO2 and Cu/Zr0.9@SiO2.

However, the similar CH3OH activity for the Cu supported catalysts on ZrO2/SiO2 mixed oxides with varying Zr loading may seem surprising as a higher amount of promoter is expected to further enhance the CH3OH formation rate. We have thus decided to investigate these catalysts by in situ XAS on the Cu and Zr K-edge with the goal to evaluate the speciation of Cu and Zr under reaction condition for Cu/SZxO (x = 1 and 2), where a high dispersion of Zr is expected. The XAS spectra of Cu/SZxO are recorded under different conditions. (1) after exposure to air, (2) after heating at 300 ℃ under a flow of N2 at 1 bar, (3) under a flow of N2 at 230 ℃ and 1 bar after reduction with H2, and (4) under CO2 hydrogenation conditions (CO2:H2:N2 in a 1:3:1 ratio, 230 ℃ and 5 bar) (Fig. S13). The Cu K-edge shows that copper is present as CuO after exposure to air. CuO is reduced and present as metallic Cu under H2 at 300 ℃ and remains so under CO2 hydrogenation conditions for both Cu/SZxO samples (Fig. S14). It is however not possible to draw more specific conclusions regarding the state of surface Cu since the XAS signal is mostly dominated by bulk Cu.

The Zr K-edge under air indicates the presence of Zr(IV) for both Cu/SZxO (x = 1 and 2) samples. Upon heating at 300 ℃ under N2 a pre-edge appears for Cu/SZ1O. This feature was previously assigned to under-coordinated Zr(IV) surface sites in Cu/Zr0.9@SiO2, which contain only surface Zr(IV) sites; they are generated upon desorption of adsorbates (such as H2O) on the surface Zr(IV) sites when heated to 300 ℃ [24]. The same feature is also observed with Cu/SZ2O but with a lower intensity, most likely due to a smaller ratio of surface Zr atoms compared to bulk ZrO2 with increasing ZrO2 loading. After reduction under H2 at 230 ℃, no changes in the Zr K-edge XANES for both Cu/SZxO (x = 1 and 2) samples are observed, similar to the samples heated to 300 ℃ under N2. Under reaction conditions, at 5 bar and 230 ℃, the pre-edge is reduced in intensity on both samples, which likely corresponds to the partial coordination of reaction intermediates/products (CH3OH, formate, H2O…) on Zr surface sites (Fig. 2), as we proposed for Cu/Zr0.9@SiO2, where only isolated Zr surface sites are present on the SiO2 support [24]. Overall, no change in the position of the inflexion point of the XANES spectra are observed pointing to Zr remaining mainly in a 4+ oxidation state (Table S3). All the changes in the XANES spectra can thus be assigned to coordination and de-coordination of adsorbates, i.e., reaction intermediates/products on the Zr(IV) surface sites. The presence of Lewis acidic Zr surface sites are further evidenced by pyridine adsorption experiments by the appearance of additional bands (1608 cm‒1) in the IR spectra (Fig. S15) when comparing to Cu/SiO2 (Fig. S16). In particular, while on Cu/SiO2 all the pyridine is removed at 300 ℃ under high vacuum (10‒5 mbar), pyridine coordinated to Lewis acid sites are still present on the zirconium containing sample.

Fig. 2. Zr K-edge XANES spectra recorded at different stages under different reaction conditions for Cu/SZ1O and Cu/SZ2O.

In order to obtain a quantitative assessment of the number of Zr surface sites present on the Cu/SZxO as well as the ratio of Zr surface sites that are fully coordinated under reaction condition, the X-ray near edge structure (XANES) spectra are further fitted by a linear combination of three references XANES spectra (Fig. 3). Monoclinic ZrO2 (m-ZrO2) is used to represent bulk ZrO2, and well-defined isolated Zr(IV) surface sites (prepared using a Surface Organometallic Chemistry (SOMC) approach [24]) representing either coordinatively saturated or under-coordinated Zr surface sites with a coordination number of 5 (Fig. 3 and Table 3). All the XANES spectra can be adequately fitted using these three reference spectra (Fig. S17‒S18).

Fig. 3. Representation of three types of Zr sites used for XANES fitting.
Table 3
Results of the linear combination fit of the in situ Zr K-edge XANES spectra (%).

For Cu/SZ1O (Table 3 and Fig. S13) 21%‒31% of the Zr is present as bulk ZrO2 throughout all the in situ XAS experiment. Under air at room temperature 57% of the Zr is present as coordinatively saturated Zr surface sites, while 12% are coordinatively unsaturated. Upon heating under N2 at 300 ℃ all the surface Zr sites become under-coordinated and remains so after reduction and at 230 ℃. Under CO2 hydrogenation conditions, the fraction of coordinatively saturated Zr increases (26%) along with decreasing fraction of under-coordinated sites (45%). On Cu/SZ2O (Table 3 and Fig. S14), the linear combination fit shows that 39%‒52% of the Zr is present as bulk ZrO2 under all experimental conditions, consistent with a higher ratio of bulk ZrO2 when increasing the Zr loading in comparison to Cu/SZ1O. 48% of Zr correspond to coordinatively saturated Zr surface sites, which become in part under-coordinated at 300 ℃ under N2 (37%), while 24% remain coordinatively saturated. After reduction and cooling to 230 ℃ a similar ratio of under-coordinated and coordinated Zr surface sites are present (28% and 33%). Finally, under CO2 hydrogenation conditions the fraction of sites that are coordinatively saturated increases to 36%, while 19% are still present as under-coordinated sites.

Overall, the linear combination fit of the XANES spectra allows the evaluation of the amount of surface and bulk Zr sites for Cu/SZ1O and Cu/SZ2O. For each individual sample, the ratio of bulk vs. Zr surface species remains similar indicating no extensive restructuring of ZrO2 during the tested conditions. It is noteworthy that while Cu/SZ2O has a higher Zr loading than Cu/SZ1O, they display both similar concentration of under-coordinated Zr surface sites per gram of catalyst (around 90 mmol g‒1) at the reaction temperature of 230 ℃ under N2, which thus correlates with similar CH3OH formation rates for Cu/SZ1O and Cu/SZ2O. Such a finding is consistent with our previous proposal that Lewis acidic Zr surface sites are key for increasing the CH3OH formation rate[24] and shows that the role of Zr dopants is similar for all Cu/ZrO2 based CO2 hydrogenation catalysts.

4 Conclusions

All in all, copper supported on ZrO2/SiO2 mixed oxides, with varying Zr loading at similar copper loading, particle size distribution and specific surface area, are selective toward CH3OH in CO2 hydrogenation with no significant difference in catalytic performance at different Zr loadings. In situ XAS reveals that the reactivity of supported copper nanoparticles on the ZrO2/SiO2 mixed oxides for CO2 hydrogenation to CH3OH correlates with the number of under-coordinated Zr surface sites, rather than the Zr loading, thus indicating that a high dispersion of Zr is likely a key descriptor to enhance the CH3OH formation rate. Such type of molecular level structure-activity relationship paves the way towards more rational design of CO2 hydrogenation catalysts.

Supporting Information.

Additional data including IR and XAS spectra, catalytic data, X-ray powder diffractograms and TEM images (PDF)

Funding Sources

E.L., K.L., P.W., and S.T. are supported by the SCCER-Heat and Energy Storage program. We acknowledge PSI Super-XAS for beamtime and thank Dr. Maarten Nachtegaal (PSI) for assistance and ScopeM at ETH Zürich for the use of their electron microscopy facilities and Dr. Dmitry Lebedev (ETH) for TEM.

References
[1]
G. A. Olah, A. Goeppert, G. K. S. Prakash, Beyond Oil and Gas:The Methanol Economy[M]. 2nd ed. Wiley-VCH: Weinheim, Germany, 2011.
[2]
A. Olah George, Angew. Chem. Int. Ed., 2013, 52, 104-107. DOI:10.1002/anie.201204995
[3]
A. Álvarez, A. Bansode, A. Urakawa, A. V. Bavykina, T. A. Wezendonk, M. Makkee, J. Gascon, F. Kapteijn, Chem. Rev., 2017, 117, 9804-9838. DOI:10.1021/acs.chemrev.6b00816
[4]
S. Dang, H. Yang, P. Gao, H. Wang, X. Li, W. Wei, Y. Sun, Catal. Today, 2018. DOI:10.1016/j.cattod.2018.04.021
[5]
S. G. Jadhav, P. D. Vaidya, B. M. Bhanage, J. B. Joshi, Chem. Eng. Res. Des., 2014, 92, 2557-2567. DOI:10.1016/j.cherd.2014.03.005
[6]
J. Artz, T. E. Müller, K. Thenert, J. Kleinekorte, R. Meys, A. Sternberg, A. Bardow, W. Leitner, Chem. Rev., 2018, 118, 434-504. DOI:10.1021/acs.chemrev.7b00435
[7]
A. Goeppert, M. Czaun, J. P. Jones, G. K. Surya Prakash, G. A. Olah, Chem. Soc. Rev., 2014, 43, 7995-8048. DOI:10.1039/C4CS00122B
[8]
J. Wang, G. Li, Z. Li, C. Tang, Z. Feng, H. An, H. Liu, T. Liu, C. Li, G. Li, Sci. Adv., 2017, 3, e1701290. DOI:10.1126/sciadv.1701290
[9]
F. Studt, I. Sharafutdinov, F. Abild-Pedersen, C. F. Elkjær, J. S. Hummelshøj, S. Dahl, I. Chorkendorff, J. K. Nørskov, Nat. Chem., 2014, 6, 320-324. DOI:10.1038/nchem.1873
[10]
H. Bahruji, M. Bowker, G. Hutchings, N. Dimitratos, P. Wells, E. Gibson, W. Jones, C. Brookes, D. Morgan, G. Lalev, J. Catal., 2016, 343, 133-146. DOI:10.1016/j.jcat.2016.03.017
[11]
X. Jiang, N. Koizumi, X. Guo, C. Song, Appl. Catal. B, 2015, 170-171.
[12]
O. Martin, A. J. Martín, C. Mondelli, S. Mitchell, T. F. Segawa, R. Hauert, C. Drouilly, D. Curulla-Ferré, J. Pérez-Ramírez, Angew. Chem. Int. Ed., 2016, 55, 6261-6265. DOI:10.1002/anie.201600943
[13]
I. A. Fisher, A. T. Bell, J. Catal., 1997, 172, 222-237. DOI:10.1006/jcat.1997.1870
[14]
I. A. Fisher, H. C. Woo, A. T. Bell, Catal. Lett., 1997, 44, 11-17. DOI:10.1023/A:1018916806816
[15]
K. T. Jung, A. T. Bell, Catal. Lett., 2002, 80, 63-68. DOI:10.1023/A:1015326726898
[16]
C. Schild, A. Wokaun, A. Baiker, J. Mol. Catal., 1990, 63, 243-254. DOI:10.1016/0304-5102(90)85147-A
[17]
J. Weigel, R. A. Koeppel, A. Baiker, A. Wokaun, Langmuir, 1996, 12, 5319-5329. DOI:10.1021/la9506990
[18]
S. Kattel, B. Yan, Y. Yang, J. G. Chen, P. Liu, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2016, 138, 12440-12450. DOI:10.1021/jacs.6b05791
[19]
K. Larmier, W. C. Liao, S. Tada, E. Lam, R. Verel, A. Bansode, A. Urakawa, A. Comas-Vives, C. Copéret, Angew. Chem. Int. Ed., 2017, 56, 2318-2323. DOI:10.1002/anie.201610166
[20]
S. Tada, K. Larmier, R. Buchel, C. Copéret, Catal. Sci. Technol., 2018, 8, 2056-2060. DOI:10.1039/C8CY00250A
[21]
S. Tada, F. Watanabe, K. Kiyota, N. Shimoda, R. Hayashi, M. Takahashi, A. Nariyuki, A. Igarashi, S. Satokawa, J. Catal., 2017, 351, 107-118. DOI:10.1016/j.jcat.2017.04.021
[22]
S. Tada, A. Katagiri, K. Kiyota, T. Honma, H. Kamei, A. Nariyuki, S. Uchida, S. Satokawa, J. Phys. Chem. C, 2018, 122, 5430-5442. DOI:10.1021/acs.jpcc.7b11284
[23]
S. Tada, S. Kayamori, T. Honma, H. Kamei, A. Nariyuki, K. Kon, T. Toyao, K. I. Shimizu, S. Satokawa, ACS Catal., 2018, 7809-7819.
[24]
E. Lam, K. Larmier, P. Wolf, S. Tada, O. V. Safonova, C. Copéret, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2018, 40, 10530-10535.
[25]
J. C. Frost, Nature, 1988, 334, 577-580. DOI:10.1038/334577a0
[26]
S. Foraita, J. L. Fulton, Z. A. Chase, A. Vjunov, P. Xu, E. Baráth, D. M. Camaioni, C. Zhao, A. J. Lercher, Chem. Eur. J., 2015, 21, 2423-2434. DOI:10.1002/chem.201405312
[27]
Y. H. Wang, W. G. Gao, H. Wang, Y. E. Zheng, W. Na, K. Z. Li, RSC Adv., 2017, 7, 8709-8717. DOI:10.1039/C6RA28305E
[28]
I. Ro, Y. Liu, M. R. Ball, D. H. K. Jackson, J. P. Chada, C. Sener, T. F. Kuech, R. J. Madon, G. W. Huber, J. A. Dumesic, ACS Catal., 2016, 6, 7040-7050. DOI:10.1021/acscatal.6b01805
[29]
C. Copéret, A. Comas-Vives, M. P. Conley, D. P. Estes, A. Fedorov, V. Mougel, H. Nagae, F. Núñez-Zarur, P. A. Zhizhko, Chem. Rev., 2016, 116, 323-421. DOI:10.1021/acs.chemrev.5b00373
[30]
K. W. Terry, C. G. Lugmair, T. D. Tilley, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 1997, 119, 9745-9756. DOI:10.1021/ja971405v
[31]
C. Copéret, F. Allouche, K. W. Chan, M. P. Conley, M. F. Delley, A. Fedorov, I. B. Moroz, V. Mougel, M. Pucino, K. Searles, K. Yamamoto, P. A. Zhizhko, Angew. Chem. Int. Ed., 2017, 57, 6398-6440.
[32]
A. Roussey, P. Gentile, D. Lafond, E. Martinez, V. Jousseaume, C. Thieuleux, C. Coperet, J. Mater. Chem. C, 2013, 1, 1583-1587. DOI:10.1039/c2tc00796g
[33]
K. Larmier, S. Tada, A. Comas-Vives, C. Copéret, J. Phys. Chem. Lett., 2016, 7, 3259-3263. DOI:10.1021/acs.jpclett.6b01328
[34]
O. Muller, M. Nachtegaal, J. Just, D. Lutzenkirchen-Hecht, R. Frahm, J. Synchrotron Radiat., 2016, 23, 260-266. DOI:10.1107/S1600577515018007