催化学报  2020, Vol. 41 Issue (2): 302-311      DOI: S1872-2067(19)63520-5   PDF    
扩展功能
加入收藏夹
复制引文信息
加入引用管理器
Email Alert
RSS
本文作者相关文章
Zetian He
Sen Liu
Yi Zhong
Daimei Chen
Hao Ding
Jiao Wang
Gaoxiang Du
Guang Yang
Qiang Hao
Preparation of BiPO4/graphene photoelectrode and its photoelectrocatalyitic performance
Zetian Hea, Sen Liua, Yi Zhonga, Daimei Chena, Hao Dinga, Jiao Wangb, Gaoxiang Dua, Guang Yanga, Qiang Haoc     
a. Beijing Key Laboratory of Materials Utilization of Nonmetallic Minerals and Solid Wastes, National Laboratory of Mineral Materials, School of Materials Science and Technology, China University of Geosciences, Beijing 100083, China;
b. Beijing Polytechnic College, Beijing 100042, China;
c. Centre for Technology in Water and Wastewater, School of Civil and Environmental Engineering, University of Technology Sydney, Sydney 2007, Australia
* Corresponding author. Daimei Chen, E-mail: chendaimei@cugb.edu.cn;
Hao Ding, E-mail: dinghao113@126.com
This work was partly supported by the National Natural Science Foundations of China (21577132, 21978276), the Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities (2652018326, 2652018298, 2652018297), and the Beijing Municipal Education Commission Key Science and Technology Project Fund (KZ201910853043)
Abstract: In this work, a two-step electrodeposition method was employed to prepare BiPO4 nanorod/reduced graphene oxide/FTO composite electrodes (BiPO4/rGO/FTO). The BiPO4/rGO/FTO composite electrode showed the higher photoelectrocatalytic (PEC) activity for the removal of methyl orange than pure BiPO4, which was 2.8 times higher than that of BiPO4/FTO electrode. The effects of working voltage and BiPO4 deposition time on the degradation efficiency of methyl orange were investigated. The optimum BiPO4 deposition time was 45 min and the optimum working voltage was 1.2 V. The trapping experiments showed that hydroxyl radicals (·OH) and superoxide radicals (·O2-) were the major reactive species in PEC degradation process. The BiPO4/rGO/FTO composite electrode showed the high stability and its methyl orange removal efficiency remained unchanged after four testing cycles. The reasons for the enhanced PEC efficiency of the BiPO4/rGO/FTO composite electrode was ascribed to the broad visible-light absorption range, the rapid transmission of photogenerated charges, and the mixed BiPO4 phase by the introduction of rGO in the composite electrode films.
© 2020, Dalian Institute of Chemical Physics, Chinese Academy of Sciences.
Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
Key words: Reduced graphene oxide    BiPO4    Fluorine-doped tin oxide    Electrodeposition    Photoelectrocatalysis    Methyl orange    
BiPO4/石墨烯光电极的制备及其光电催化性能
和泽田a, 刘森a, 钟义a, 陈代梅a, 丁浩a, 王佼b, 杜高翔a, 杨光a, 郝强c     
a. 中国地质大学(北京)材料科学与工程学院, 北京 100083, 中国;
b. 北京工业职业技术学院, 北京 100042, 中国;
c. 澳大利亚悉尼科技大学土木与环境工程学院, 悉尼2007, 澳大利亚
摘要:光电催化(PEC)氧化法是一种使用半导体电极材料在光和电的共同作用下处理水中有机污染的有效方法.在PEC工艺中,施加偏压不仅可以利用电催化对有机污染物进行降解,而且在偏压作用下,光生电子-空穴对能够得到有效的分离和传输,从而大大提高了机物污染物的去除速率.尽管PEC技术已经取得了许多重要的突破,但是能量转换效率仍然无法满足实际应用.因此,开发具有优异性能,良好稳定性和低成本的光电极材料是一项具有挑战性的研究工作.本文采用两步电沉积法制备了BiPO4纳米棒/还原氧化石墨烯/FTO复合光电极(BiPO4/rGO/FTO).电镜结果表明,电沉积制得的纳米棒状磷酸铋均匀负载在石墨烯纳米片层表面.采用甲基橙为模型体系,考察了复合光电极的光电催化活性.BiPO4/rGO/FTO复合电极的光电催化降解速率是BiPO4/FTO光电极的2.8倍,显示出优良的光电催化活性.实验进一步研究了工作电压和BiPO4沉积时间对甲基橙光电降解性能的影响.最佳的BiPO4沉积时间为45min,最佳工作电压为1.2V.捕获实验和ESR实验表明羟基自由基(·OH)和超氧化物自由基(·O2-)是该电极的主要活性物种.BiPO4/rGO/FTO复合电极经过四次循环实验后其降解甲基橙效率保持不变,显示出高稳定性,采用光电流,交流阻抗及其荧光测试对其光催化机理进行推测.结果表明该复合光电极具有高PEC活性的主要原因是:石墨烯的引入加快了BiPO4的电子空穴的分离,拓宽了石墨烯的可见光吸收范围;同时,石墨烯诱导产生的BiPO4混合相也进一步促进了光生电子空穴的分离,提高了光电降解活性.
关键词还原氧化石墨烯    BiPO4    FTO    电沉积    光电催化    甲基橙    

1 Introduction

Photoelectrocatalytic (PEC) oxidation has been regarded as a potential approach of solving the problems of the organic pollution in aqueous solution using different semiconductor electrodes [1-3]. In the PEC process, the applied bias potential not only utilizes the electrochemical degradation of organic compounds but also improves the photocatalytic oxidation by accelerating the separation of electron-hole pairs. Early studies on photoelectrode materials for PEC reactions focused on TiO2. However, TiO2 can only absorb 3%-4% portion of UV light in sunlight due to the wide band gap (3.0-3.2 eV), which results in a very low PEC conversion efficiency. Consequently, a lot of visible-light-response photoelectrodes such as WO3 (2.6 eV), Fe2O3 (2.1 eV), BiVO4 (2.4 eV), have been widely developed to improve the utilization of solar energy [4-10]. Although many decisive breakthroughs have been made after the continuous development of PEC technology, the energy conversion efficiency still cannot match the practical applications. Thus, it is challenging to develop photoelectrodes with excellent performance, high stability and low cost.

In 2010, Zhu et al. [11] reported a new indirect bandgap semiconductor photocatalyst BiPO4 with a band gap of 3.85 eV for the first time. And its photocatalytic degradation of methyl blue (MB) performance was much higher than that of P25. The high photocatalytic activity of BiPO4 was ascribed to its high valence potential and the induction of PO43–, which can promote the effective separation of electron-hole pairs. Due to the excellent photocatalytic oxidation property of BiPO4, it might be a promising material for environmental treatment in the practical applications. However, most of studies, until now, were limited to the traditional powder system photocatalytic technology. Inherent limitations, such as the stability and reuse of the catalysts, were seldom explored [12, 13]. Recently, Zhang et al. [14] prepared BiPO4 photoelectrodes through one-step cathodic electrodeposition approach, and they reported that BiPO4 photoelectrode exhibited the excellent PEC degradation efficiency of organic pollutants. However, BiPO4 can only be excited in the ultraviolet region, which leads to the low utilization efficiency of sunlight. Our early work first prepared BiOI/BiPO4/FTO composite electrode by a simple two-step electrodeposition method to improve the light utilization and the photocatalytic performance. The PEC activity of BiOI/BiPO4/FTO composite electrode for the removal of tetracycline under the visible light was 2.46 times as high as that of the BiPO4/FTO electrode [15]. However, until now, a few papers have been reported about the preparation and properties of BiPO4 or BiPO4 based composite electrode. Searching for a new modification method to improve the PEC activity of BiPO4 electrode is still a challenge and need further study.

Graphene is a two-dimensional material composed of sp2 single-layer hexagonal carbon. Due to unique thermodynamic, electrical, optical and mechanical functions, it has drawn wide attention from many fields. Moreover, its application in the photocatalytic technology has been widely concerned [16-22]. The modification of photocatalytic materials with graphene can enhance the conductivity and improve the photocatalytic activity due to the quicker transfer of electrons. In particular, the combination of semiconductors and graphene is widely recognized as one of the most promising electrodes in photoelectrocatalysis. Furthermore, the deposition of the graphene film on the conductive substrate can further serve a substrate for the uniform growth of the crystal of the photocatalyst material to obtain a graphene-modified composite electrode material. Many graphene-modified photoelectrode semiconductor materials, such as ZnO/rGO, Cu2O/rGO, BiVO4/rGO and Fe2O3/rGO, showed the enhanced anode photocurrent and high PEC conversion efficiency [23-29].

In this work, a BiPO4/rGO/FTO composite photoelectrode was prepared by a simple two-step electrodeposition method. The BiPO4/rGO/FTO composite photoelectrode exhibits higher PEC activity than BiPO4/FTO photoelectrode. The introduction of rGO substrate not only increased the light absorption of BiPO4 but also promoted the separation and transfer of photogenerated electron-holes pairs. The effects of working voltage and the electrodeposition time on the degradation efficiency of methyl orange were investigated. The mechanism of enhancing PEC activity of BiPO4/rGO/FTO composite photoelectrode was discussed. This two-step simple electrodeposition method for the preparation of photoelectrode material might have a potential for scale production, and this composite photoelectrode might be a promising material for the environmental treatment.

2 Experimental
2.1 Preparation of rGO/FTO electrodes

All the used chemicals were analytical reagents. All electrochemical deposition experiments were carried out with an electrochemical workstation (CHI760E, Shanghai Huachen Instrument Co., Ltd.). The resistance of the fluorine-doped tin oxide (FTO) glass resistor was 15 ohms and its area was 5 × 2.5 cm2. FTO glass modification was performed according to the following steps. FTO glass was soaked in ethanol for ultrasonic cleaning for 30 min, soaked in 10% dilute nitric acid for 30 min, and then thoroughly washed with the mixture of ethanol and distilled water, and dried at 60 ℃ in an oven. The electrolyte of graphene oxide was prepared according to the following steps. The graphene oxide powder was ultrasonically dispersed in 100 mL of ultrapure water to configure a solution having a concentration of 2 mg/mL. Then, a certain amount of LiClO4 was added to reach a concentration of 0.12 M. Electrodeposition of rGO/FTO electrode was performed according to the following steps. rGO/FTO electrode material was prepared by electrodeposition reduction in a three-electrode system with saturated calomel electrode (SCE) as the reference electrode, FTO as working electrode, and Pt wire as the counter electrode. The rGO/FTO composite electrode material was obtained by electrodeposition for 150 s at a bias voltage of -1.5 V.

2.2 Preparation of BiPO4/rGO/FTO electrode

BiPO4 precursor electrolyte solution was prepared according to the following steps. The electrodeposition process of this composite electrode is shown in Fig. 1. Firstly, 10 mM ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid was dissolved into 100 mL of distilled water and then 10 mM lanthanum nitrate pentahydrate was added to adjust the pH to below 1. After that, 100 mM sodium phosphate decahydrate was added to adjust the pH to 1 and then 50 mL of 30% hydrogen peroxide was added. BiPO4/rGO/FTO was prepared by the two-step electrodeposition method as following steps. In the three-electrode system, the saturated calomel electrode, the as prepared rGO/FTO electrode and the Pt wire were respectively used as the reference electrode, the working electrode, and the counter electrode. Before the electrodeposition of BiPO4, the rGO/FTO electrode was rinsed with distilled water. The BiPO4/rGO/FTO electrodes were prepared by electrodeposition of BiPO4 precursor at a bias of -0.15 V for different deposition time. The obtained different BiPO4/rGO/FTO electrodes were denoted as BiPO4/rGO/FTO-x min (x = 30, 45 and 60 min), respectively. For the comparison, the BiPO4/FTO electrode was prepared by direct electrodeposition of BiPO4 precursor on the surface of FTO under the same conditions.

Fig. 1. Flow chart for the preparation of BiPO4/rGO/FTO electrode.
2.3 Characterization

The crystal structure of the electrode material was characterized by a German Bruker D8 Advance X-ray powder diffractometer (XRD). The Cu target with λ = 1.5418 has an instrument power of 3 kV, a voltage of 40 kV, a current of 20 mA, and a scan range of 10° to 70°. With the SU8010 cold field emission scanning electron microscope (SEM), under the acceleration voltage of the electron beam of 100 kV, the microscopic morphology of the electrode material was characterized. The morphology and crystal structure of the electrode material was characterized by an FEI Tecnai G2 F30 field emission transmission electron microscope (TEM) under an accelerating voltage of 200 kV. The Hitachi U-3900 UV-Vis spectrophotometer was used for the characterization of UV-vis diffuse reflectance spectra of the materials. The optical properties of the catalyst were characterized by the FLS980 fluorescence spectrometer (Edinburgh, UK) with an excitation wavelength of 225 nm. The Raman spectra of the materials were characterized by HORIBA HR 800 laser confocal micro-Raman spectroscopy. The elemental composition of the material was characterized by an X-ray photoelectron spectrometer (PHI Quantern, Japanese).

2.4 Catalytic performance test

The photoelectric synergistic performance of materials was explored with an electrochemical workstation (CHI760E, Shanghai Huachen Instrument Co., Ltd.). In the three-electrode system, the saturated calomel electrode, the Pt wire and the BiPO4/rGO/FTO electrode were used as the reference electrode, the counter electrode and the working electrode. With 10 ppm MB as an organic pollutant model, the PEC performance of the catalytic substrate was investigated. The light source was an ultraviolet lamp with an output intensity of 10 W. The change in the concentration of the MB solution was detected with a Hitachi U-3900 UV-vis spectrophotometer under an absorption wavelength of 464 nm. The volume of methyl orange solution in the quartz reactor was 100 mL and the effective area of ​​the BiPO4/rGO/FTO electrode was 5 cm2. The effect of deposition time of BiPO4 on the PEC activity of composite electrode materials was investigated under a certain bias voltage. The effects of different working voltages on the PEC activity of the electrodes were investigated. The photocatalytic, electrocatalytic and photoelectrocatalytic removal efficiencies of the methyl orange solution by BiPO4/rGO/FTO electrodes were studied. Electrochemical tests such as transient response photocurrent density, electrochemical impedance spectroscopy and linear sweep volt-ampere curve were explored in the same three-electrode system with an electrochemical workstation. The electrolyte solution was 100 mL of 0.1 M Na2SO4.

3 Results and discussion
3.1 Morpholog and structure

The SEM images of rGO/FTO, BiPO4/FTO and BiPO4/rGO/FTO photoelectrode are shown in Fig. 2. Layered ultrathin graphene films, formed by the reduction of graphene oxide under a certain negative bias, were uniformly deposited on the FTO glass sheet (Fig. 2(a)). Pure BiPO4 nanorods were deposited on FTO glass (Fig. 2(b)). The morphology of pure BiPO4 shows the regular nanorod with a length of 1-2 μm and a diameter of 400-600 nm. In Fig. 2(c) and 2(d), BiPO4 nanorods with the length at the range of 2-2.5 μm and the diameter distribution range of 1.5-2 μm were uniformly distributed on the rGO nanosheets. Compared with the pure BiPO4 nanorods, the BiPO4 nanorods in the composite became larger and irregular, and the ratio of length to diameter was increased. This fact showed that introduction of rGO affected the growth of BiPO4 crystals.

Fig. 2. SEM images of rGO/FTO (a), BiPO4/FTO (b), rGO/BiPO4/FTO (c, d).

In order to further explore the crystal structure of the electrode material, the prepared BiPO4/rGO/FTO materials were characterized by XRD. It can be seen that the characteristic peak of graphene oxide at 2θ = 11° is absent in pure rGO/FTO, indicating that the graphene oxide was reduced into the rGO during electrodeposition (Fig. 3). The major characteristic peaks of BiPO4 such as (100), (101), (110), (200) and (102) were observed in the XRD patterns, which were consistent with the standard PDF card of hexagonal BiPO4 (JCPDS No. 15-0766). For the BiPO4/rGO/FTO composite photoelectrode, the characteristic peaks of monoclinic phases BiPO4 at (011), (111), (200), (120), (202), (220) and (022) (JCPDS No. 15-0767) can also be observed, indicating that the formation of mixture crystal structure of hexagonal and monoclinic phases in this composite electrode. This fact shows that the introduction of rGO might affect the crystal growth of BiPO4, resulting in the phase transfer from hexagonal crystal to monoclinic crystal.

Fig. 3. XRD patterns of rGO/FTO, BiPO4/FTO and BiPO4/rGO/FTO electrodes.

The TEM and HRTEM images of BiPO4/rGO/FTO composite photoelectrodes were shown in Fig. 4. BiPO4 nanorods were uniformly deposited on the layer rGO film. The lattice fringes of BiPO4 were observed in HRTEM images of the BiPO4/rGO/FTO composite photoelectrode (Fig. 4(c)). The diffraction speckle pattern obtained by Fourier transform (Fig. 4(d)) showed that the lattice spacings correspond to (111), (220) and (022) of monoclinic phase of BiPO4 crystal were respectively 0.3514, 0.2383, and 0.2328 nm, which were consistent with XRD results.

Fig. 4. TEM (a, b), HRTEM (c) images, and Fourier transform spectra (d) of BiPO4/rGO/FTO electrode.

The Raman spectra of GO, rGO, BiPO4 and BiPO4/rGO/FTO composite photoelectrodes were shown in Fig. 5. The characteristic peaks of graphene (D peak and G peak) occurred at 1342 and 1587 cm‒1 in the Raman spectra of GO and rGO. The D peak indicated the formation of defects in the associated graphite layer structure due to the introduction of oxygen-containing functional groups, whereas the G band indicated the symmetry and crystallinity of graphene. Compared with GO, rGO showed the higher ID/IG ratio, indicating that GO was reduced to rGO during electrodeposition. The O-Bi-O vibration peak of BiPO4 appeared at 238 cm‒1, and the vibration peaks of PO43+ were observed at 350, 562, 569, and 1093 cm‒1. The composite electrode showed the vibration peak of PO43+ in BiPO4 at 607 and 1098 cm‒1 and the characteristic D peak and G peak of rGO at 1342 and 1587 cm‒1, indicating that two materials of rGO and BiPO4 were well combined in the BiPO4/rGO/FTO composite photoelectrode. Moreover, the value of ID/IG was further increased indicating that the reduction degree of graphene was further improved during the electrodeposition process of BiPO4. These changes increased the conductivity of rGO, accelerated the transfer of photogenerated charges of BiPO4 and enhanced the PEC activity consequently. In addition, the G peak of graphene in the BiPO4/rGO/FTO electrode shifted from 1587 to 1591 cm‒1, indicating that a strong chemical interaction occurred between rGO and BiPO4.

Fig. 5. Raman spectra of GO, rGO, BiPO4/rGO and BiPO4 electrodes.

The XPS broad spectra of BiPO4/FTO and BiPO4/rGO/FTO photoelectrodes and the narrow spectra of Bi 4f, O 1s and C 1s are shown in Fig. 6. The peaks of Bi, P, O, C and other elements were observed in the wide spectra of two electrode materials (Fig. 6(a)). The two peaks of 159.4 and 164.7 eV in the BiPO4/FTO electrode respectively represented the Bi 4f7/2 and Bi 4f5/2 peaks of the Bi-O bond (Fig. 6(b)). In the BiPO4/rGO/FTO composite electrode, the peaks of Bi-O bond shifted to 160.1 and 165.4 eV, respectively. The increase in Bi3+ binding energy in BiPO4/rGO/FTO composite photoelectrodes might be ascribed to the transfer of the outer electrons of BiPO4 to rGO. It suggested that the electron cloud density of BiPO4 was decreased. In the O 1s narrow spectra of BiPO4/rGO/FTO and BiPO4/FTO photoelectrodes, the peaks at 530 and 532 eV (Fig. 6(c)) corresponded to Bi-O and C-O peaks. In the narrow spectrum of C 1s of the BiPO4/FTO and BiPO4/rGO/FTO composite photoelectrodes, the peaks at 284.8 and 286.6 eV corresponded to the C-C and C-O bonds, respectively. However, it was odd that the peak of the C-O bond occurred in the BiPO4/FTO photoelectrode. It was conjectured that some residual organic matters in EDTA did not removed clearly. Furthermore, compared with the BiPO4/FTO electrode, the peak areas of the C-C and C-O bonds increased, which was due to the present of rGO in the composite. The O 1s narrow spectra of BiPO4/rGO/FTO and BiPO4/FTO photoelectrode at 530 and 532 eV were ascribed to Bi-O and C-O peak, respectively (Fig. 6(d)). Similarly, the C-O peak at 532.5 eV in the BiPO4/FTO electrode was mainly ascribed to residual organic matters in EDTA during the synthesis of photoelectrode. The Bi-O peak area at 530.8 eV was decreased in the BiPO4/rGO/FTO composite photoelectrode, whereas the C-O peak area at 532.5 eV was increased because the introduction of rGO could give occasion to the increase of the content of C-O bond.

Fig. 6. XPS broad spectra (a), Bi 4f (b), O 1s (c), and C 1s (d) spectra of BiPO4/FTO and BiPO4/rGO/FTO electrodes.

The UV-vis diffuse reflectance spectra (DRS) of BiPO4/FTO photoelectrode and BiPO4/rGO/FTO composite photoelectrode under the different disposition time was shown in Fig. 7. BiPO4 had light absorption only in the ultraviolet region and the absorption edge was about 375 nm. When the BiPO4 nanorods were electrodeposited on the substrate of the rGO, the UV-vis diffuse absorption edge of the BiPO4/rGO/FTO composite photoelectrode was red-shifted. In the composite electrode, the light absorption intensity and range varied with BiPO4 electrodeposition time. When deposition time of BiPO4 was 45 min, the obtained BiPO4/rGO/FTO composite photoelectrode had the largest redshift range and photoresponse range, which improve the visible absorption of BiPO4/FTO photoelectrode.

Fig. 7. UV-vis diffuse reflectance spectra of BiPO4/rGO/FTO and BiPO4/FTO photoelectrodes.
3.2 Photoelectrochemical performance

In order to explore the effects of rGO and the BiPO4 deposition time on the PEC activity of the BiPO4 nanorod photoelectrode, the PEC degradation experiments were carried out with 10 ppm methyl orange as the model pollutant and 10 W UV lamp as the light source. The BiPO4/rGO/FTO composite electrode had a much better degradation effect on methyl orange than the BiPO4/FTO photoelectrode under a constant applied bias voltage of 1.2 V (Fig. 8(a)), indicating that the introduction of film greatly enhanced the PEC degradation activity of BiPO4 nanorods. As given in Fig. 8(b), the degradation reaction rate constant reactions of methyl orange by BiPO4/rGO/FTO composite electrode under the different deposition time. All the composite photoelectrodes have the higher PEC activity than BiPO4 nanorod photoelectrode. When the BiPO4 deposition time was 45 min, the BiPO4/rGO/FTO electrode had the optimal reaction rate constant (k = 0.281), which was 4.3 times higher than that of the BiPO4/FTO electrode (k = 0.065). Further increasing the loading of BiPO4, the reaction rate began to decrease. The reason is that the overloading of BiPO4 might affect the light absorption of the underlying material and thus decreased the PEC activity.

Fig. 8. PEC activity (a) and reaction rate constants (b) of BiPO4/FTO and BiPO4/rGO/FTO composite photoelectrodes under different deposition time.

It was given that the effect of working voltage on the PEC activity of BiPO4/rGO/FTO–45 min composite photoelectrode under different applied operating voltages. The operating voltage varied from 0.6 to 1.4 V. The removal rate of methyl orange increased at first and then decreased as the operating voltage increased. At the applied working voltage of 1.2 V, the BiPO4/rGO/FTO composite photoelectrode had the optimum removal rate of methyl orange, indicating that 1.2 V was the optimum applied operating voltage for the PEC degradation. In the PEC degradation of pollutants, the applied bias voltage was one of the important factors affecting the degradation performance. The bias voltage could promote the transfer of photogenerated electrons to the platinum wire electrode through the external circuit. The electrons were effectively separated from holes in space, thus enhancing the quantum efficiency of photoelectroncatalysts. When the applied voltage reaches a certain value, the composite photoelectrode of the photogenerated electrons experienced directional movement and most of the photogenerated electrons were separated from holes to form a saturated photocurrent resulting in optimal photoelectric catalytic efficiency. When the voltage exceeded the optimum value, the space charge layer and the Hertz layer of the catalyst might be redistributed due to excessive working bias voltage, thus reducing photo-generated carriers and the PEC activity.

Fig. 9. PEC activity (a) and kinetic curves (b) of BiPO4/rGO/FTO–45 min electrode under the different external working voltage.

In order to prove the photoelectric synergy of BiPO4/rGO/FTO composite photoelectrode, the photocatalytic, electrocatalytic and photoelectrocatalytic activities of this composite material were compared. After the 10 ppm methyl orange solution was irradiated for 5 h with a 10 W UV lamp without the catalyst, the pollutant concentration was not significantly changed, indicating that the self-degradation of methyl orange solution under the irradiation of UV lamp could be ruled out (Fig. 10(a)). The photocatalytic degradation rate of methyl orange by BiPO4/rGO/FTO composite photoelectrode was only about 20% after 5 h under UV light irradiation. The electro-catalysis degradation rate of methyl orange was about 50% after 5 h under the bias voltage of 1.2 V. The PEC degradation efficiency of methyl orange in BiPO4/rGO/FTO composite photoelectrode was increased to about 80%. However, the reaction rate constant of the BiPO4/rGO/FTO composite photoelectrode was 0.281 k/h–1, which was about 2 times higher than the electrocatalytic reaction rate constant and 5 times higher than photocatalytic reaction rate constant (Fig. 10(b)). The reaction kinetic constants indicated that the PEC degradation rate of methyl orange had the synergistic effect for the removal of organic compounds [30].

Fig. 10. Photocatalytic, electrocatalytic and photoelectrocatalytic activities (a) of BiPO4/rGO/FTO composite photoelectrodes and reaction rate constants (b).
3.3 Enhancement mechanism of the photoelectrocatalytic performance

To further demonstrate the enhancement effect of photogenerated electrons on the synergistic catalytic performance, transient photocurrent response and electrochemical impedance spectroscopy (EIS) tests were performed. The photocurrent response intensity of the BiPO4/FTO photoelectrode was about 0.1 mA/cm2 (Fig. 11(a)). The BiPO4/rGO/FTO–45 min composite photoelectrode had the optimal photocurrent response intensity of about 0.4 mA/cm2, which was 4 times that of the BiPO4 electrode. The EIS (Fig. 11(b)) also showed that the BiPO4/rGO/FTO–45 min composite photoelectrode had the smallest internal resistance and efficient electron transfer. The results were consistent with the PEC activities of prepared electrodes. The composite electrodes had a stronger light absorption intensity and a wider light absorption range than the pure BiPO4 electrode. The rGO film as a conductive medium could increase the conductivity of the electrode and accelerate the electron-hole separation, thus enhancing the catalytic activity of the photoelectric composite electrode material.

Fig. 11. Transient photocurrent response diagram and (b) electrochemical impedance spectra of BiPO4/FTO, BiPO4/rGO/FTO–30 min, BiPO4/rGO/FTO–45 min, and BiPO4/rGO/FTO–60 min electrodes.

Based on the linear electrochemical voltammetric curve (LSV), the photoelectrochemical properties of various electro-optical materials were compared and shown in Fig. 12. The pure BiPO4/FTO nanorod photoelectrode had the lowest photocurrent density under UV light in the bias voltage range of 0‒1.8 V. The introduction of the rGO film significantly increased the photocurrent response density of the photoelectrode, indicating that graphene accelerated the separation of photogenerated carriers. The results of LSV were agreed with the photocurrent density results.

Fig. 12. Linear sweep voltammetry curves of BiPO4/FTO, BiPO4/rGO/FTO–30 min, BiPO4/rGO/FTO–45 min and BiPO4/rGO/FTO–60 min electrodes under UV light irradiation.

As shown in Fig. 13, the BiPO4/FTO thin film electrode had the strongest PL peak. After the combination of rGO (BiPO4/rGO/FTO), the PL peak intensities were greatly reduced, indicating that the rGO film accelerated the separation and transfer of electron-hole pairs due to its excellent conductivity. The BiPO4/rGO/FTO–45 min composite photoelectrode had the lowest PL peak and the lowest electron-hole recombination efficiency, indicating the highest PEC activity.

Fig. 13. PL spectra of BiPO4/FTO, BiPO4/rGO/FTO-30 min, BiPO4/rGO/FTO-45 min, and BiPO4/rGO/FTO-60 min electrodes.

The main active species during the degradation process were determined by free radical trapping experiments, and then the mechanism of photoelectric synergistic catalysis could be indirectly inferred. The degradation experiments were carried out under a 10W UV lamp and a bias voltage of 1.2 V. Methanol (MA), isopropanol (IPA) and p-benzoquinone (BQ) were used as the traps for the hole (h+), hydroxyl radical (OH) and superoxide radical (O2-) trapping agent, respectively. There was no significant decrease in the removal efficiency of methyl orange by BiPO4/rGO/FTO composite photoelectrode after adding methanol (Fig. 14), indicating that holes (h+) did not directly participate in the degradation of methyl orange and was not the main active species in the PEC reaction. However, the degradation efficiency of BiPO4/rGO/FTO composite photoelectrode decreased significantly after adding IPA, indicating that OH was a main active species in the PEC reaction process. The removal efficiency of methyl orange by BiPO4/rGO/FTO composite photoelectrode decreased significantly after the addition of p-benzoquinone, indicating that O2- was another main active species in the PEC reaction process. From the above results, it could be inferred that holes did not directly play a role in the degradation of methyl orange. These active substances (OH and O2-) dominated the photovoltaic synergistic catalytic reaction during the catalytic process.

Fig. 14. Active species trapping experiment for the degradation of methyl orange with the BiPO4/rGO/FTO–45 min electrodes.

Based on the experimental results, the mechanism of the BiPO4/rGO/FTO electrode for the enhancement of the PEC activity was tentatively explained and shown in the Fig. 15. A large number of electron-hole pairs were generated in BiPO4 under the UV light irradiation. As a good electron conductor, graphene rapidly transferred the photogenerated electrons to the FTO. The applied bias voltage formed an electric field to transfer electrons through the FTO glass to the Pt electrode, further accelerating electron-hole separation and transfer. A large number of photogenerated electrons were accumulated on the Pt electrode and reacted with adsorbed oxygen molecules to produce O2- active species, which ultimately degraded organic pollutants. Correspondingly, the photogenerated holes generated by BiPO4 could react with water molecules in the solution to produce another active species OH. The OH has strong oxidizing properties and can rapidly degrade pollutants. On the other hand, the introduction of rGO led to the BiPO4 transition from the hexagonal phase to the monoclinic phase. The formation of a mixed crystal phase contributed to the separation of electrons and holes. In addition, graphene had a conjugated structure with a large π bond, which helped to increase the adsorption of pollutants on the catalyst surface and accelerated the photocatalytic oxidation reaction. The PEC activity of the BiPO4/rGO/FTO composite photoelectrode finally enhanced [31].

Fig. 15. Photoelectrocatalysis mechanism of BiPO4/rGO/FTO electrodes.
3.4 Stability of BiPO4/rGO/FTO electrodes

A cyclic experiment was carried out in a static system to further investigate the stability of the BiPO4/rGO/FTO electrode in the degradation process of methyl orange. From Fig. 16, the photoelectric catalytic oxidation effect of the BiPO4/rGO/FTO electrode did not decrease significantly after four cycles of degradation reaction of 20 h, indicating that the BiPO4/rGO/FTO electrode had the good stability.

Fig. 16. Cycle stablity test of methyl orange degradation with the BiPO4/rGO/FTO–45 min electrodes.
4 Conclusions

In this work, BiPO4/rGO/FTO composite photoelectrodes were prepared by a simple two-step electrodeposition method. The composite photoelectrodes had the excellent photoelectrocatalysis performance compared to the BiPO4/FTO electrode, Graphene, as a good electron conductor, could accelerate the separation and transfer of electrons-hole pairs and improve light absorption of BiPO4/FTO electrode. In addition, the introduction of rGO led to the formation of mixture phase of BiPO4, further promoting the separation of photogenerated charges. Free radical inactivation experiments showed that OH and O2- might be the main active species in the photoelectrocatalytic degradation process. The composite electrode material exhibited extremely high stability and its photoelectric synergistic catalytic oxidation effect was not decreased significantly after four cycles of degradation reaction for 20 h. The prepared composite electrode has great application prospects in the field of photoelectrocatalytic oxidation for practical water purification.

Acknowledgment

This work was partly supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (21577132, 21978276), the Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities (2652018326, 2652018298, 2652018297), and the Beijing Municipal Education Commission Key Science and Technology Project Fund (KZ201910853043).

References
[1]
S. Chai, G. Zhao, Y. N. Zhang, Y. Wang, F. Nong, Environ. Sci. Technol., 2012, 46, 10182-10190. DOI:10.1021/es3021342
[2]
T. Li, X. Li, Q. Zhao, Y. Shi, W. Teng, Appl. Catal. B, 2014, 156, 362-370.
[3]
C. Zhai, M. Zhu, D. Bin, H. Wang, Y. Du, C. Wang, P. Wang, ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces, 2014, 6, 17753-17761. DOI:10.1021/am504263e
[4]
P. Chatchai, A. Y. Nosaka, Y. Nosaka, Electrochim. Acta, 2013, 94, 314-319. DOI:10.1016/j.electacta.2013.01.152
[5]
H. Zheng, J. Z. Ou, M. S. Strano, R. B. Kaner, A. Mitchell, K. Kalantar-zadeh, Adv. Funct. Mater, 2011, 21, 2175-2196. DOI:10.1002/adfm.201002477
[6]
X. Zhang, D. Chandra, M. Kajita, H. Takahashi, L. Dong, A. Shoji, K. Saito, T. Yui, M. Yagi, Int. Hydrogen J. Energy, 2014, 39, 20736-20743. DOI:10.1016/j.ijhydene.2014.06.062
[7]
X. F. Wu, Y. Sun, H. Li, Y. J. Wang, C. X. Zhang, J.-R. Zhang, J. Z. Su, Y. W. Wang, Y. Zhang, C. Wang, M. Zhang, Alloys J. Compd., 2018, 740, 1197-1203. DOI:10.1016/j.jallcom.2018.01.100
[8]
Z. Liu, Q. Song, M. Zhou, Z. Guo, J. Kang, H. Yan, Chem. Eng. J., 2019, 374, 554-563. DOI:10.1016/j.cej.2019.05.191
[9]
D. Chen, Z. Liu, ChemSusChem, 2018, 11, 3438-3448. DOI:10.1002/cssc.201801614
[10]
Y. Li, Z. Liu, J. Zhang, Z. Guo, Y. Xin, L. Zhao, J. Alloys Compd., 2019, 790, 493-501. DOI:10.1016/j.jallcom.2019.03.178
[11]
C. S. Pan, Y. F. Zhu, Environ. Sci. Technol., 2010, 44, 5570-5574. DOI:10.1021/es101223n
[12]
T. K. Kim, M. N. Lee, S. H. Lee, Y. C. Park, C. K. Jung, J. H. Boo, Thin Solid Films, 2005, 475, 171-177. DOI:10.1016/j.tsf.2004.07.021
[13]
Y. Zhang, B. Shen, H. Huang, H. Ying, B. Fei, F. Lv, Appl. Surf. Sci., 2014, 319, 272-277. DOI:10.1016/j.apsusc.2014.07.052
[14]
Y. F. Zhang, M. Sillanpaa, S. Obregon, G. Cobn, J. Mol. Catal. A, 2015, 402, 92-99. DOI:10.1016/j.molcata.2015.03.011
[15]
S. Liu, M. Y. Zhao, Z. T. He, Y. Zhong, H. Ding, D. M. Chen, Chin. J. Catal., 2019, 40, 446-457. DOI:10.1016/S1872-2067(18)63186-9
[16]
N. C Zheng, T. Ouyang, Y. Chen, Z. Wang, D. Y. Chen, Z. Q. Liu, Catal. Sci. Technol., 2019, 9, 1357-1364. DOI:10.1039/C8CY02206B
[17]
Z. Liu, E. Lei, J. Ya, Y. Xing, Appl. Surf. Sci., 2009, 255, 6415-6420.
[18]
X. Zhao, H. Liu, J. Qu, Appl. Surf. Sci., 2011, 257, 4621-4624. DOI:10.1016/j.apsusc.2010.12.099
[19]
G. Yang, D. Chen, H. Ding, J. Feng, J. Z. Zhang, Y. Zhu, S. Hamid, D. W. Bahnemann, Appl. Catal. B, 2017, 219, 611-618. DOI:10.1016/j.apcatb.2017.08.016
[20]
Y. Li, X. Wu, W. Ho, K. Lv, Q. Li, M. Li, S. C. Lee, Chem. Eng. J., 2018, 336, 200-210. DOI:10.1016/j.cej.2017.11.045
[21]
Z. Zhou, Y. Li, K. Lv, X. Wu, Q. Li, J. Luo, Mater. Sci. Semicond. Process, 2018, 75, 334-341. DOI:10.1016/j.mssp.2017.11.011
[22]
K. Lv, S. Fang, L. Si, Y. Xia, W. Ho, M. Li, Appl. Surf. Sci., 2017, 391, 218-227. DOI:10.1016/j.apsusc.2016.03.195
[23]
S. K. Mandal, K. Dutta, S. Pal, S. Mandal, A. Naskar, P. K. Pal, T. S. Bhattacharya, A. Singha, R. Saikh, S. De, D. Jana, Mater. Chem. Phys., 2019, 223, 456-465. DOI:10.1016/j.matchemphys.2018.11.002
[24]
M. Li, G. H Xu, Z. Y. Guan, Y. Wang, H. Yu, Y. Yu, Sci. Total Environ., 2019, 664, 230-239. DOI:10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.02.027
[25]
D. Chen, J. Yang, Y. Zhu, Y. Zhang, Y. Zhu, Appl. Catal. B, 2018, 233, 202-212. DOI:10.1016/j.apcatb.2018.04.004
[26]
D. Chen, Z. Wang, T. Ren, H. Ding, W. Yao, R. Zong, Y. Zhu, J. Phys. Chem. C, 2014, 118, 15300-15307. DOI:10.1021/jp5033349
[27]
Z. M. Zhang, C. T. Gao, Y. X. Li, W. Han, W. Fu, Y. He, E. Xie, Nano Energy, 2016, 30, 892-899. DOI:10.1016/j.nanoen.2016.08.059
[28]
Y. Lan, Z. Liu, Z. Guo, X. Li, L. Zhao, L. Zhan, M. Zhang, Dalton Trans., 2018, 47, 12181-12187. DOI:10.1039/C8DT02581A
[29]
D. Chen, Z. Liu, Z. Guo, W. Yan, Y. Xin, J. Mater. Chem. A, 2018, 6, 20393-20401. DOI:10.1039/C8TA07503D
[30]
D. Cao, Y. B. Wang, M. Qiao, X. Zhao, J. Catal., 2018, 360, 240-249. DOI:10.1016/j.jcat.2018.01.017
[31]
C. S. Pan, Y. F. Zhu, J. Mater. Chem., 2011, 21, 4235-4241. DOI:10.1039/c0jm03655b