催化学报  2020, Vol. 41 Issue (2): 333-340      DOI: S1872-2067(19)63428-5   PDF    
扩展功能
加入收藏夹
复制引文信息
加入引用管理器
Email Alert
RSS
本文作者相关文章
Hang Zhao
Zhangqian Liang
Xiang Liu
Pengyuan Qiu
Hongzhi Cui
Jian Tian
Noble metal-like behavior of plasmonic Bi particles deposited on reduced TiO2 microspheres for efficient full solar spectrum photocatalytic oxygen evolution
Hang Zhao, Zhangqian Liang, Xiang Liu, Pengyuan Qiu, Hongzhi Cui, Jian Tian     
School of Materials Science and Engineering, Shandong University of Science and Technology, Qingdao 266590, Shangdong, China
* Corresponding author. Hongzhi Cui, E-mail: cuihongzhi1965@163.com;
Jian Tian, Tel/Fax: +86-532-86057929; E-mail: jiantian@sdust.edu.cn
The authors are thankful for fundings from the National Natural Science Foundation of China (51872173 and 51772176), Taishan Scholarship of Young Scholars (tsqn201812068), Natural Science Foundation of Shandong Province (ZR2017JL020), Taishan Scholarship of Climbing Plan (tspd20161006), and Key Research and Development Program of Shandong Province (2018GGX102028)
Abstract: Herein, novel plasmonic Bi metal in situ deposited in reduced TiO2 microspheres (Bi@R-TiO2) are fabricated via a bimetallic MOF-derived synthesized strategy by adjusting the synthesizing temperature. Different characterization techniques, including XRD, SEM, TEM, XPS, DRS, PL, EIS, and photocurrent generation, are performed to investigate the structural and optical properties of the as-prepared samples. The results indicate that the Bi particles are generated inside and outside of reduced TiO2 microspheres via the reduction of Ti4+ and Bi3+ by ethylene glycol. When the annealing temperature is controlled at 300 ℃, the corresponding Bi@R-TiO2-300 sample with an appropriate amount of Bi nanoparticles exhibits the highest full solar spectrum photocatalytic oxygen evolution activity (4728.709 μmol h-1 g-1), which is 5.9 and 9.5 times higher than that of pure TiO2 and Bi-Ti bimetal organic frameworks (Bi-Ti-MOFs). Several reasons are suggested for the above results:(1) Bi metal behaves as an "electron acceptor" to accelerate the charge carrier transfer from TiO2 to Bi; (2) The surface plasmon resonance effect of loaded metallic Bi particles can enhance the visible and NIR light absorption capacity; (3) The generation of Ti3+ further narrows the band gap of TiO2.
© 2020, Dalian Institute of Chemical Physics, Chinese Academy of Sciences.
Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
Key words: Bi nanoparticles    Full solar spectrum    O2 evolution    Photocatalysis    Porous microspheres    
具有贵金属行为的等离子Bi纳米颗粒负载到还原TiO2微米球及其高效全光谱光催化产氧
赵行, 梁嫜倩, 刘香, 邱鹏源, 崔洪芝, 田健     
山东科技大学材料科学与工程学院, 山东青岛 266590
摘要:化石燃料的快速消耗导致了严重的环境问题,特别是全球变暖和雾霾.寻找替代传统化石能源的清洁能源是当务之急.光催化水分解技术被认为是将太阳能转化为绿色可再生能源的一种很有前景的方法.作为一种用于光催化的半导体材料,需要满足三个条件:(1)带隙要高于水分解的电压(1.23eV);(2)带边缘位置应跨越氢还原电位和氧氧化电位;(3)在光催化过程中,光催化材料应具有抗光腐蚀的稳定性.然而,水氧化的半反应是非常困难的,主要是涉及到复杂的四电子氧化过程和O-O键形成的高激活能量.TiO2是光催化剂中最重要的材料之一,因为它具有成本低,无毒,光稳定性好等优点。但TiO2的可见光利用率低,载流子复合率高,光催化效率受到严重限制.通过H2还原可以引入Ti3+,还原得到的TiO2带隙变窄,具有较好的可见光催化产氧活性.由于贵金属纳米粒子具有表面等离子体共振(SPR)效应,将贵金属(如金或者银)与TiO2结合是将光催化剂的光吸收边扩展到更长的波长一种有效途径.然而,贵金属的价格限制了它们的商业化,因此需要低成本的金属作为替代品.最近,金属铋(Bi)被证明是贵金属的理想替代品,具有明显的SPR效应,在可见光甚至近红外范围具有优异的光吸收性能.通过光还原,化学还原,水热还原等还原方法,可以方便地获得金属Bi.然而,通过原位沉积的方法将金属Bi纳米粒子直接沉积到半导体表面仍然是一个很大的挑战.本文采用双金属有机骨架衍生的合成策略,通过调节合成温度,将金属Bi原位沉积到还原TiO2微球表面(Bi@R-TiO2).采用X射线衍射,扫描电镜,透射电镜,X射线光电子能谱,漫反射光谱,光致发光光谱,阻抗,光电流响应等表征技术对制备样品的结构和光学性能进行了研究.结果表明,通过乙二醇可以将Ti4+还原为Ti3+得到还原的TiOx,Bi3+同时也被还原为金属Bi.当退火温度控制在300℃时,相应的Bi@R-TiO2-300表现出最高的全光谱光催化产氧活性(4728.709μmol h-1 g-1),分别是的纯TiO2和Bi-Ti双金属有机框架的5.9和9.5倍.这可归因于以下三点:(1)金属Bi作为“电子受体”,加速了TiO2向Bi的载流子转移;(2)负载到还原TiO2表面的金属Bi具有SPR效应可以增强可见光和近红外光的吸收能力;(3)Ti3+的产生进一步减小TiO2的禁带宽度.
关键词铋纳米颗粒    全光谱    产氧    光催化    多孔微米球    

1 Introduction

Recently, the rapid consumption of fossil fuel has led to serious environmental issues, especially global warming and haze. It is urgent to find clean energy sources to replace the traditional fossil energy [1-5]. Photocatalytic water splitting was regarded as a promising way to convert solar energy into green and renewable energy. As a semiconductor for spontaneous photocatalysis, there are three requirements should be fulfilled: (1) the band gap should be higher than water decomposition voltage (1.23 eV); (2) the band edge positions should stride the hydrogen and oxygen redox potential, and (3) it ought to be stable against photo corrosion during photocatalysis [6]. However, the half-reaction of water oxidation is tough because of the complex four-electrons redox process and high activation energy for O–O bond formation [7]. Therefore, huge efforts have been made to increase the efficiency of the water oxidation on a variety of catalysts, especially on TiO2, which is perhaps one of the most important materials in photocatalysis due to its natural abundance, low cost, non-toxicity and superior photostability [8]. However, TiO2's photocatalytic efficiency is severely limited because of the low visible light utilization and the high recombination rate of charge carriers [9]. It is known that H2 reduction could introduce Ti3+ [10]. The resultant reduced TiO2 had a narrower band gap [11], which exhibited high activity in visible–light–driven water oxidation [12, 13].

The combination of noble metals (e.g., Au and Ag) with TiO2 is another promising route to extend the light absorption of the photocatalysts to longer wavelength light due to surface plasmon resonance (SPR) effects of noble metal nanoparticles [14]. Whereas, the price of noble metals limits their commercialization, thus call for low-cost metals as substitute [15]. Most recently, semimetal bismuth (Bi) has been demonstrated to be an ideal substitute for noble metals due to its obvious SPR effect in the visible or even NIR range [16]. By in situ reduction routes such as photo-reduction, chemical reduction and hydrothermal reduction, respectively, Bi-based powder can be facilely obtained with significant role of photocatalyst performed in further application [17]. For example, Bi/g-C3N4 showed outstanding visible photocatalytic capability [15]. The enhancement of visible light absorption was considered to be caused by the SPR effect of Bi metal. In addition, the electrical conductivity of these Bi-coupled nanocomposites increases so that the transfer rate of photogenerated carriers can be accelerated by coupling with Bi metal [18]. However, it is still a great challenge to directly deposit Bi metal nanoparticle onto the surface of semiconductors through the in situ deposition route.

In this paper, we report a MOF-derived strategy that metallic Bi particles are in situ deposited inside and outside of reduced TiO2 microspheres (Bi@R-TiO2) via a simple and low energy cost hydrothermal method. In the hydrothermal procedure, ethylene glycol (EG) as a reductant in the reduction of Bi3+ and Ti4+ to metallic Bi and Ti3+, respectively. In the case of the Bi@R-TiO2 composite, the main role of Bi metal is taken as follows: (1) Bi metal behaves as an "electron acceptor" to accelerate the charge carrier transfer from TiO2 to Bi and (2) the composite strongly absorbs visible and NIR light because of the SPR effect of Bi metal. Meanwhile, the generation of Ti3+ further narrows the band gap of TiO2. Based on this, the Bi@R-TiO2 composite demonstrates a superior full solar spectrum photocatalytic oxygen evolution.

2 Experimental
2.1 Synthesis

In a typical process, stoichiometric amounts of urea, titanium butoxide and bismuth nitrate pentahydrate in a molar ratio of 3:1:1 were added into 60 mL of EG. To form clean solution, the solution should be stirred at room temperature. After being stirred for 2 h, the mixed suspension was transferred into a 100 mL Teflon-coated autoclave at 160 ℃ for 6 h. The as-prepared Bi-Ti-MOFs were washed thoroughly with ethanol, and then dried at 60 ℃ for 12 h under vacuum. Finally, the obtained products were calcined at temperatures ranging from 200 to 350 ℃ for 5 h in Ar atmosphere at a ramping rate of 10 ℃ min–1 to form the Bi@R-TiO2 composites. For distinguishing the products, Bi@R-TiO2 obtained upon calcination at 200, 250, 300 and 350 ℃ in Ar atmosphere is labeled as Bi@R-TiO2-200, Bi@R-TiO2-250, Bi@R-TiO2-300 and Bi@R-TiO2-350, respectively.

2.2 Characterization

X-ray powder diffraction (XRD) patterns were recorded with a D/Max2500PC X-ray diffractometer with Cu-Kα1 radiation (λ = 0.15406 nm) operated at 40 kV. Scanning electron microscopy (SEM) was performed with a FEI NanoSEM 450 instrument with an energy dispersive X-ray spectroscopy (EDX). Transmission electron microscopy (TEM) and high resolution TEM (HRTEM) were carried out with a FEU G20 transmission electron microscope with an accelerating voltage of 200 kV. X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS) was performed using a Theromo ESCALAB 250Xi spectrometer using Al Kα radiation at a voltage of 1486.6 eV and this instrument was calibrated with the C 1s binding energy of 284.8 eV. The Pore size distribution was measured using the Brunauer Emmett Teller (BET) method as-examined on a Micromeritics ASAP2020 nitrogen adsorption-desorption apparatus. The UV-vis-NIR diffuse reflectance spectra (DRS) of the samples were tested on a UV-vis-NIR spectrophotometer (Hitachi UV-3101) with an integrating sphere attachment within 200–1800 nm range. The photoluminescence (PL) spectra were acquired at room temperature with a FLS920 fluorescence spectrometer under the ultraviolet excitation of 325 nm.

2.3 Photocatalytic activity test

The photocatalytic activity of the prepared samples was evaluated toward the oxygen evolution in a quartz reactor containing 100 mL of deionized water in the presence of sacrificial agent. The photocatalytic tests were tested with 20 mg catalyst dispersed with a mechanical stirring and argon was used as a carrier gas. Deionized water was used as oxygen source and silver nitrate was added as sacrificial agent and electron acceptors with the purpose of exclusively discuss the oxygen evolution reaction. The reaction products were measured on-line by thermal conductivity detectors on a microgas chromatography GC-7920 instruments.

3 Results and discussion

Based on the SEM, XPS and FTIR spectra of Bi-Ti-MOFs (Figs. S1–S3), the preparation process is schematically illustrated in Scheme 1. The Bi-Ti bimetal organic frameworks (Bi-Ti-MOFs) are firstly prepared using a hydrothermal method, which present uniform sphere structures (Fig. S1). Herein, EG is not only utilized as a solvent but also as both a reductive and organic complexing agent. During the solvothermal reaction process, partial Bi3+ are gradually reduced to elemental Bi0 and partial Ti4+ are reduced to Ti3+ to catalyze the growth of Bi-Ti-MOFs, which are confirmed by XPS analyses of Bi-Ti-MOFs shown in Fig. S2. As shown in Fig. S3, peaks centered at 2853.5 and 2920 cm–1 correspond to the symmetry (νs) and anti-symmetry (νas) stretching vibration of C–H bonding in the group of –CH2–. The peaks centered at 3361, 1455, 1069 and 884 cm–1 can be assigned, respectively, to the νOH, δOH, νCO and γOH of C–O and O–H bonding in the group of –CH2–OH. Subsequently, the Bi nanoparticles are uniformly dispersed on the inside and outside of reduced TiO2 microspheres (Fig. S4) after annealing of Bi-Ti-MOFs at 200 to 350 ℃ in Ar.

Scheme1. A schematic of the proposed mechanisms for the design of Bi-Ti bimetal-organic frameworks (Bi-Ti-MOFs) and Bi@R-TiO2-300 composites derived from carbonization of Bi-Ti-MOFs at 300 ℃ under Ar.

The powder XRD measurement can be used to characterize the phase information (Fig. 1). In Bi-Ti-MOFs, the peak at 11.63° can be attributed to graphite oxide. The metal-organic network layers interact with each other through the hydrogen bonding and intermolecular interaction to form a graphite-like layered structure. Upon annealing at 200 ℃ (curve (b)), only the interlayer spacing is slightly enlarged to some extent owing to hydrate evaporation within the Bi-Ti-MOF layer. When the annealing temperature is increased to 250 ℃ (curve (c)), the Bi-Ti-MOF structure starts to decompose into Bi@R-TiO2. All peaks can be perfectly indexed to anatase phase of TiO2 (JCPDS No. 21-1272) and rhombohedral structure of Bi (JCPDS No. 05-0519) [19]. However, there is no diffraction peak of Ti2O3 or Ti3O5 in the Bi@R-TiO2-250 samples, which may be ascribed that the low amount of reduced TiO2. Further increasing the annealing temperature, the XRD diffraction peaks still belong to TiO2 and Bi.

Fig. 1. XRD patterns of Bi-Ti-MOFs (a), Bi@R-TiO2-200 (b), Bi@R-TiO2-250 (c), Bi@R-TiO2-300 (d), and Bi@R-TiO2-350 (e).

In order to better understand the growth of the Bi@R-TiO2 microspheres, XPS of Bi@R-TiO2 microspheres was performed. The survey spectrum in Fig. S5 indicates that the dominant elements are Ti, C, O and Bi in the Bi@R-TiO2 composite. The high-resolution XPS of Bi 4f reveals that the two tiny peaks center at 156.9 and 162.3 eV, which can be assigned to Bi3+ [20]. The two strong peaks at 158.6 and 164.0 eV can be ascribed to the Bi 4f7/2 and Bi 4f5/2 of metallic Bi0, respectively [21]. The probable reason for this phenomenon is probably due to the fact that the amount of oxidation of metallic Bi0 to Bi3+ was very small. This result further demonstrates that the oxide layer exclusively exists on the Bi sphere surface, which could prevent the Bi metal from further oxidation [21]. Similar observation had been reported by Dong et al. [22], which could be attributed to the easy surface oxidation of Bi element in air to form a thin layer of Bi2O3. Fig. 2(b) shows the high resolution XPS scans over Ti 2p peaks. Two XPS peaks at 458.6 and 464.7 eV could be assigned to Ti4+ 2p3/2 and Ti4+ 2p1/2 [23]. Besides, the existence of peaks at 458.3 and 464.2 eV can prove the formation of Ti3+ [24], which is the result of reduction of Ti4+ with the treatment of EG. Because of the presence of Ti3+, the band gap of TiO2 will be narrowed. The asymmetric O 1s signal (Fig. 2(c)) indicates several oxygen species coexist on the surface of the sample. After deconvolution, the O 1s XPS spectrum can be fitted with four peaks corresponding to Bi–O bands (529.5 eV), Ti–O bands (529.9 eV) and surface hydroxyl oxygen (531.5 eV) [25]. For C 1s spectra (Fig. 2(d)), the two strong peaks located at 284.8 and 288.2 eV can be attributed to graphitic –C–C and –C–O functionalities, respectively [26]. The MOFs precursor is calcined at 300 ℃ to form carbon structures.

Fig. 2. Bi 4f (a), Ti 2p (b), O 1s (c), and C 1s (d) XPS spectra of Bi@R-TiO2-300.

The morphologies of the prepared samples were characterized by SEM, TEM, and HRTEM. As is shown in Fig. 3(a), the Bi@R-TiO2-300 still consists of nearly spherical-sharped nanoparticles with the average size of 400 nm. However, the Bi metal can not be directly detected in the SEM images due to its small particle size. To obtain further information about the microstructures of these Bi nanoparticles, TEM analysis was employed. Figs. 3(b) and S4 clearly demonstrates that many uniformly distributed dots with the size of several nm were dispersed on the inside and outside of spheres, which are probably Bi nanoparticles. The lattice fringe spacings of 0.328 and 0.35 nm (Fig. 3(c)), which can be attributed to the (012) plane of Bi and (101) plane of TiO2 [27]. It further indicates that the metallic Bi has successfully distributed on the reduced TiO2 microspheres to form the effective heterojunctions. The EDX mapping of Bi@C-TiOx-300 as shown in Fig. S6 suggests that the Bi, O, C and Ti elements are distributed uniformly in Bi@R-TiO2-300.

Fig. 3. SEM (a), TEM (b), and HRTEM (c) images of Bi@R-TiO2-300.

To further analyze the textural properties of the samples, the isotherms and the pore size distributions are measured by N2 adsorption-desorption measurement (Fig. 4). All the samples show the typical type IV isotherms with H3 hysteresis loops, suggesting the existence of mesopores [28]. As is shown in the Table S1, The BET surface area of the Bi@R-TiO2-300 is up to 156.5 m2 g–1, which is higher than that of other samples. Therefore, such a high specific surface area of Bi@R-TiO2-300 with mesoporous structure would be beneficial for O2 evolution because of its abundant active edge sites to the reactants.

Fig. 4. N2 adsorption-desorption isotherms and the corresponding pore size distribution curves (inset) of pure TiO2 (a), Bi@R-TiO2-200 (b), Bi@R-TiO2-250 (c), Bi@R-TiO2-300 (d), and Bi@R-TiO2-350 (e).

The adsorption properties of the samples were analyzed by UV-vis-NIR absorption spectroscopy. As is shown in Fig. 5, compared with pure TiO2, the photoabsorption of Bi@R-TiO2 samples undergo distinct enhancement in the entire visible and NIR light region which is due to SPR effect of the loading Bi and introduction of Ti3+. The Bi@R-TiO2-200 and Bi@R-TiO2-250 show poor light absorption due to the low amount of Bi [29]. The Bi@R-TiO2-300 exhibits the best light absorption, which should be attributed to the suitable loading amount of Bi [30]. However, the Bi@R-TiO2-350 exhibits a relatively poor visible-light absorption compared with Bi@R-TiO2-300 due to the much bigger Bi particles. The band gap energy of pure TiO2 could be simulated from the formula (αhν)1/2∝hν − Eg, where α, h, ν, and Eg are absorption coefficient, Planck's constant, light frequency, and band gap energy, respectively (Fig. S7(a)). The fitted band gap energy of pure TiO2 is about 3.1 eV. The band gap energy of pure TiO2 XPS valence band spectra is performed to determine the valence band energy. As is shown in Fig. S7(b), the valence band (VB) potential of pure TiO2 (V = +2.79 eV) is below the water oxidation levels (V=+1.23 eV) (Fig. S7(c)). On the basis of the band gaps obtained from the UV-vis-NIR diffuse reflection spectra, the conduction band (CB) edges can be estimated to be –0.31 eV for pure TiO2 (Fig. S7(c)).

Fig. 5. UV-vis-NIR diffuse reflectance spectra of TiO2, Bi@R-TiO2-200, Bi@ TiO2-250, Bi@ TiO2-300 and Bi@ TiO2-350.

The photoelectrochemical (PEC) analysis has been carried on investigating the charge carrier separation and transfer process of the samples, which are closely related to the photocatalytic performance of photocatalysts [31]. As is shown in Fig. 6(a), it is clear that the Bi@R-TiO2-300 exhibits the higher photocurrent density than that of TiO2 under light illumination, which suggests that the introduction of metallic Bi has a significant effect on the electronic properties of Bi@R-TiO2-300. This result indicates that the electron-hole transfer and separation process will be significantly enhanced in the Bi@R-TiO2-300. Fig. 6(b) illustrates the comparison of the electrochemical impedance (EIS) measurements of the Bi@R-TiO2-300 and TiO2. As previously reported, a smaller arc size on an EIS Nyquist plot indicates a smaller charge-transfer resistance on the electrode surface and a higher separation efficiency of electron-hole pairs [32]. Clearly, the impedance values of composites in the dark are obviously larger than those under light illumination, which is ascribed to the enhanced electron conductivity under light irradiation [33]. Furthermore, the arc radius of Bi@R-TiO2-300 are smaller than that of TiO2 under light illumination, implying that the Bi@R-TiO2-300 possesses the lower charge transfer resistance and the higher electron mobility. The reason is that the existence of metallic Bi plays a key role as an electron trap in facilitating the separation of photogenerated electrons and holes [21]. Then the recombination of photogenerated electron-hole pairs is inhibited and the photocatalytic activity is improved finally.

Fig. 6. The transient photocurrent density (a) and the Nyquist diagram (b) of the electrochemical impedance spectra (EIS) at open circuit potential vs. SEC of the samples in the dark and under light irradiation.

To investigate the separation of photoinduced charge carriers, steady-state and time-resolved PL spectroscopy is carried out. In general, a lower steady-state PL intensity implies a longer lifetime and higher separation efficiency of photo-generated charge carriers, leading to higher photocatalytic activity [34]. As shown in Fig. 7(a), pure TiO2 has a fast recombination of photoinduced electron-hole pairs. When the metallic Bi load on the reduced TiO2 spheres, the PL is drastically quenched (Fig. 7(a)). The recombination of the photo-induced charge carriers can be restrained by the SPR effect of the Bi nanospheres. An increased lifetime of charge carriers can be observed in Fig. 7(b), which is in agreement with the steady-state PL measurement results. The intensity-average lifetimes (τ) of Bi@R-TiO2-300 is 2.59 ns, which is higher than that of TiO2 (2.43 ns). It is reasonable that the increased lifetime of Bi@R-TiO2-300 composites is related to the charge-separation efficiency.

Fig. 7. (a) Steady-state photoluminescence (PL) and (b) time-resolved fluorescence decay spectra of Bi@R-TiO2-300 and TiO2, λex = 325 nm.

The photocatalytic O2 evolution over pure TiO2, Bi-Ti-MOFs and Bi@R-TiO2 synthesized at different temperatures without using any noble-metal co-catalyst was tested under simulated solar light irradiation. As is shown in the Fig. 8(a), pure TiO2 and Bi-Ti-MOFs have only little O2 evolution activity. As expected, metallic Bi deposition on the reduced TiO2 spheres further improved the photocatalytic activity of the composite. The photocatalytic activity increases with the increasing annealing temperature from 200 to 300 ℃, which can be attributed to the improved light absorption (Fig. 5). However, with the annealing temperature increasing to 350 ℃, the photocatalytic activity decreased, which is probably due to the formation of Bi2O3 covering the active sites (Bi) of Bi@R-TiO2, which block the light absorption and electron transfer [35]. The Bi@R-TiO2-300 exhibits the most efficient photocatalytic performance (4728.709 μmol h–1 g–1), which is ∼5.9 and 9.4 times higher than that of pure TiO2 and Bi-Ti-MOFs (Fig. 8(b)). This evidence apparently demonstrates that the photocatalytic activities of Bi@R-TiO2 are highly improved by the modification of metallic Bi. Thus, the discovery that metallic Bi could behave as a superior non-noble-metal-based cocatalyst is of great significance. The photocatalytic O2 evolution activity of Bi@R-TiO2-300 is measured under a prolonged simulated solar light irradiation for 15 h (Fig. S8), and no obvious decay of photocatalytic activity is discerned, suggesting exceptional photocatalytic stability during the photocatalytic O2 evolution. The high-resolution peaking-fitting XPS spectra of Bi 1s of Bi@R-TiO2-300 after cycling under simulated solar light irradiation are measured. As shown in Fig. S9, there is almost no change in Bi3+ (Bi2O3) XPS peaks of Bi@R-TiO2-300 before cycling and after cycling, which further confirms the excellent stability of Bi metal in Bi@R-TiO2-300.

Fig. 8. Time course (a) and rate of O2 evolution (b) over pure TiO2, Bi@R-TiO2-200, Bi@R-TiO2-250, Bi@R-TiO2-300, Bi@R-TiO2-350, and Bi-Ti-MOFs with 0.01 mol/L AgNO3 aqueous solution under simulated solar light irradiation.

On the basis of the results and discussion above, a possible photocatalytic mechanism for the Bi@R-TiO2 composites was proposed and schematically exhibited in Scheme 2. First, the SPR effect of metallic Bi propels the Bi@R-TiO2 samples to absorb more visible and NIR light, as demonstrated in UV-vis-NIR DRS (Fig. 5). Second, Ti3+ ions in the Bi@R-TiO2 composites form sublevel states below the CB of TiO2, which reduce the band gap of TiO2 and make the electrons of Bi@R-TiO2 composites can be excited by the visible light. Third, the Fermi level (vs. NHE) of metallic Bi is approximately –0.17 eV [36], which is more positive than the CB of pure TiO2 (–0.31 eV). The metallic Bi was deposited on the inside and outside of TiO2 microspheres and functioned as an electron acceptors, which played an important role in the electron transfer [37, 38]. The electrons transfer from CB of TiO2 to metallic Bi, which reduces the recombination of electron-hole pairs and increases the lifetime of charge carriers in TiO2. The holes in the VB can react with H2O to form O2. The equation is as follows:

Scheme2. Schematic of the photocatalytic mechanism of Bi@R-TiO2 composites under full solar spectrum light irradiation.
(1)
4 Conclusions

In summary, Bi cocatalysts are in situ deposited on the inside and outside of reduced TiO2 microspheres (Bi@R-TiO2 composites) with outstanding full solar spectrum photocatalytic oxygen evolution activity are fabricated via using a bimetallic MOF-derived synthesized strategy by adjusting the synthesizing temperature. During the hydrothermal process, Ti4+ is reduced to Ti3+ to form reduced TiO2 microspheres and Bi3+ is reduced to metallic Bi nanoparticles by EG and then deposited on the reduced TiO2 microspheres. The introduction of Ti3+ reduces the bandgap of TiO2 and extends the visible light absorption of TiO2. Metallic Bi also has a positive effect on the morphology as well as the optical and electronic properties of TiO2. SPR effects of Bi nanoparticles enhance the visible and NIR light absorption of Bi@R-TiO2. The electrons excited by reduced TiO2 would transfer to metallic Bi, which promotes the separation of charge carriers. Among the as-synthesized samples, the Bi@R-TiO2-300 sample with an appropriate amount of Bi nanoparticles exhibits the most efficient full solar spectrum photocatalytic oxygen evolution activity (4728.709 μmol h–1 g–1), which is 5.9 and 9.4 times higher than that of pure TiO2 and Bi-Ti-MOFs. This work not only provides new insights into the in situ fabrication of Bi/semiconductor nanocomposites but also opens a new avenue for the modification of photocatalysts with non-noble metal as cocatalyst to achieve a highly enhanced performance.

Acknowledgments

The authors are thankful for fundings from the National Natural Science Foundation of China (51872173 and 51772176), Taishan Scholarship of Young Scholars (tsqn201812068), Natural Science Foundation of Shandong Province (ZR2017JL020), Taishan Scholarship of Climbing Plan (tspd20161006), and Key Research and Development Program of Shandong Province (2018GGX102028).

References
[1]
Y. Cheng, G. Yang, H. Jiang, S. Zhao, Q. Liu, Y. Xie, ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces, 2018, 10, 38880-38891. DOI:10.1021/acsami.8b12883
[2]
Y. Ma, L. Yin, G. Cao, Q. Huang, M. He, W. Wei, H. Zhao, D. Zhang, M. Wang, T. Yang, Small, 2018, 14, 1703613. DOI:10.1002/smll.201703613
[3]
Y. Wang, W. Wei, X. Liu, Y. Gu, Sol. Energy Mater. Sol. Cells, 2012, 98, 129-145. DOI:10.1016/j.solmat.2011.10.003
[4]
P. Li, X. Duan, Y. Kuang, Y. Li, G. Zhang, W. Liu, X. Sun, Adv. Energy Mater., 2018, 8, 1703341. DOI:10.1002/aenm.201703341
[5]
L. Hang, T. Zhang, Y. Sun, D. Men, X. Lyu, Q. Zhang, W. Cai, Y. Li, J. Mater. Chem. A, 2018, 6, 19555-19562. DOI:10.1039/C8TA07773H
[6]
J. Guo, Y. Li, S. Zhu, Z. Chen, Q. Liu, D. Zhang, W. Moon, D. M. Song, RSC Adv., 2012, 1356-1363.
[7]
A. R. Parent, R. H. Crabtree, G.W. Brudvig, Chem. Soc. Rev., 2013, 42, 2247-2252. DOI:10.1039/C2CS35225G
[8]
K. Hashimoto, H. Irie, A. Fujishima, Assoc. Asia Pacific Phys. Soc. Bull., 2007, 17, 12-29.
[9]
Y. Li, X. Deng, J. Tian, Z. Liang, H. Cui, Appl. Mater. Today, 2018, 13, 217-227. DOI:10.1016/j.apmt.2018.09.004
[10]
G. Wang, H. Wang, Y. Ling, Y. Tang, X. Yang, R. C. Fitzmorris, C. Wang, J. Z. Zhang, Y. Li, Nano Lett., 2011, 11, 3026-3033. DOI:10.1021/nl201766h
[11]
F. Zuo, L. Wang, T. Wu, Z. Zhang, D. Borchardt, P. Feng, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2010, 132, 11856-11857. DOI:10.1021/ja103843d
[12]
J. Yan, Y. Zhang, S. Liu, G. Wu, L. Li, N. Guan, J. Mater. Chem. A, 2015, 3, 21434-21438. DOI:10.1039/C5TA07003A
[13]
M. Tian, H. Wang, D. Sun, W. Peng, W. Tao, Int. J. Hydrogen Energy, 2014, 39, 13448-13453. DOI:10.1016/j.ijhydene.2014.04.036
[14]
K. H. Leong, B. L. Gan, S. Ibrahim, P. Saravanan, Appl. Surf. Sci., 2014, 319, 128-135. DOI:10.1016/j.apsusc.2014.06.153
[15]
F. Dong, Z. Zhao, Y. Sun, Y. Zhang, S. Yan, Z. Wu, Environ. Sci. Technol., 2015, 49, 12432-12440. DOI:10.1021/acs.est.5b03758
[16]
X. Li, W. Zhang, W. Cui, J. Li, Y. Sun, G. Jiang, H. Huang, Y. Zhang, F. Dong, Chem. Eng. J., 2019, 370, 1366-1375. DOI:10.1016/j.cej.2019.04.003
[17]
Y. Sun, J. Liao, F. Dong, S. Wu, L. Sun, Chin. J. Catal., 2019, 4, 362-370.
[18]
J. Li, W. Zhang, M. Ran, Y. Sun, H. Huang, F. Dong, Appl. Catal. B, 2019, 243, 313-321. DOI:10.1016/j.apcatb.2018.10.055
[19]
Z. Wang, S. Yan, Y. Sun, T. Xiong, F. Dong, W. Zhang, Appl. Catal. B, 2017, 214, 148-157. DOI:10.1016/j.apcatb.2017.05.040
[20]
U. W. Hamm, D. Kramer, R. S. Zhai, D. M. Kolb, Electrochim. Acta, 1998, 43, 2969-2978. DOI:10.1016/S0013-4686(98)00037-1
[21]
X. Li, Y. Sun, T. Xiong, G. Jiang, Y. Zhang, Z. Wu, F. Dong, J. Catal., 2017, 352, 102-112. DOI:10.1016/j.jcat.2017.04.025
[22]
F. Dong, T. Xiong, Y. Sun, Z. Zhao, Y. Zhou, X. Feng, Z. Wu, Chem. Commun., 2014, 50, 10386-10389. DOI:10.1039/C4CC02724H
[23]
S. Q. Saied, J. L. Sullivan, T. Choudhury, C. G. Pearce, Vacuum, 1988, 38, 917-922. DOI:10.1016/0042-207X(88)90492-7
[24]
J. Yin, Z. Xing, J. Kuang, Z. Li, M. Li, J. Jiang, S. Tan, Q. Zhu, W. Zhou, J. Alloys Compd., 2018, 750, 659-668. DOI:10.1016/j.jallcom.2018.04.083
[25]
H. Xu, X. Hu, H. Yang, Y. Sun, C. Hu, Y. Huang, Adv. Energy Mater., 2015, 5, 1401882. DOI:10.1002/aenm.201401882
[26]
Y. Min, K. Zhang, W. Zhao, F. Zheng, Y. Chen, Y. Zhang, Chem. Eng. J., 2012, 193-194, 203-210.
[27]
Z. Zhao, W. Zhang, X. Lv, Y. Sun, F. Dong, Y. Zhang, Environ. Sci. Nano, 2016, 3, 1306-1317. DOI:10.1039/C6EN00341A
[28]
[29]
Z. D. Huang, T. T. Zhang, H. Lu, T. Masese, K. Yamamoto, R. Q. Liu, X. J. Lin, X. M. Feng, X. M. Liu, D. Wang, Y. Uchimoto, Y. W. Ma, Energy Storage Mater., 2018, 13, 329-339. DOI:10.1016/j.ensm.2017.08.012
[30]
M. Vila, A. Rivera-Calzada, E. Salas-Colera, G. R. Castro, C. Díaz-Guerra, Phys. Status Solidi. A, 2018, 215, 1800186. DOI:10.1002/pssa.201800186
[31]
X. Hu, X. Liu, J. Tian, Y. Li, H. Cui, Catal. Sci. Technol., 2017, 7, 4193-4205. DOI:10.1039/C7CY01349C
[32]
Z. Liang, X. Bai, P. Hao, Y. Guo, Y. Xue, J. Tian, H. Cui, Appl. Catal. B, 2019, 243, 711-720. DOI:10.1016/j.apcatb.2018.11.017
[33]
B. Sun, Y. Qian, Z. Liang, Y. Guo, Y. Xue, J. Tian, H. Cui, Sol. Energy Mater. Sol. Cells, 2019, 195, 309-317. DOI:10.1016/j.solmat.2019.03.030
[34]
M. Schvartzman, V. Sidorov, D. Ritter, Y. Paz, Semicond. Sci. Technol., 2001, 16, L68. DOI:10.1088/0268-1242/16/10/103
[35]
R. He, S. Cao, P. Zhou, J. Yu, Chin. J. Catal., 2014, 35, 989-1007. DOI:10.1016/S1872-2067(14)60075-9
[36]
F. Dong, Q. Li, Y. Sun, W. K. Ho, ACS Catal., 2014, 4, 4341-4350. DOI:10.1021/cs501038q
[37]
J. Tian, J. Li, N. Wei, X. Xu, H. Cui, H. Liu, Ceram. Int., 2016, 42, 1611-1617. DOI:10.1016/j.ceramint.2015.09.112
[38]
H. Cheng, B. Huang, P. Wang, Z. Wang, Z. Lou, J. Wang, X. Qin, X. Zhang, Y. Dai, Chem. Commun., 2011, 47, 7054-7056. DOI:10.1039/c1cc11525a