催化学报  2020, Vol. 41 Issue (2): 364-373      DOI: S1872-2067(19)63437-6   PDF    
扩展功能
加入收藏夹
复制引文信息
加入引用管理器
Email Alert
RSS
本文作者相关文章
Lulu Li
Peixiao Li
Wei Tan
Kaili Ma
Weixin Zou
Changjin Tang
Lin Dong
Enhanced low-temperature NH3-SCR performance of CeTiOx catalyst via surface Mo modification
Lulu Lia,c, Peixiao Lid, Wei Tanb, Kaili Mab, Weixin Zoub, Changjin Tangb,c, Lin Donga,c     
a. School of the Environment, Nanjing University, Nanjing 210093, Jiangsu, China;
b. School of Chemistry and Chemical Engineering, Nanjing University, Nanjing 210093, Jiangsu, China;
c. Jiangsu Key Laboratory of Vehicle Emissions Control, Center of Modern Analysis, Nanjing University, Nanjing 210093, Jiangsu, China;
d. Emergency Center for Environmental Monitoring at Canal Head of Middle Route of South-to-North Water Transfer Project, Nanyang 473061, Henan, China
* Corresponding author. Changjin Tang, E-mail: tangcj@nju.edu.cn;
Lin Dong, Tel: +86-25-83592290; Fax: +86-25-83317761; E-mail: donglin@nju.edu.cn
This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (21773106, 21707066, 21677069, and 21806077) and the China Postdoctoral Science Foundation (2018M642206)
Abstract: The effect of molybdenum oxide on the activity and durability of CeO2-TiO2 catalyst for NO reduction by NH3 was examined. It was found that the introduction of Mo could improve the low-temperature NH3-SCR activity and SO2/H2O durability of the CeO2-TiO2 catalyst and an optimal loading of Mo was 4 wt.%. The best MoO3/CeO2-TiO2 catalyst displayed over 90% NO conversion from 200℃ to 400℃ and obtained 4-fold increase in NO conversion compared to CeO2-TiO2 at 150℃. The characterization results revealed that the number of Brönsted acid sites over MoO3/CeO2-TiO2 was significantly increased, and the adsorption of nitrate species was dramatically weakened because of the coverage of MoO3, which were favorable for the high NH3-SCR performance. It is believed that the MoO3/CeO2-TiO2 catalyst is a suitable substitute for the NH3-SCR reaction.
© 2020, Dalian Institute of Chemical Physics, Chinese Academy of Sciences.
Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
Key words: DeNOx    CeO2-TiO2 catalyst    MoO3 modification    SO2 poisoning    Surface acidity    
表面Mo修饰提高CeTiOx催化剂低温脱硝性能
李露露a,c, 李佩晓d, 谭伟b, 马凯莉b, 邹伟欣b, 汤常金b,c, 董林a,c     
a. 南京大学环境学院, 江苏南京 210093;
b. 南京大学化学化工学院, 江苏南京 210093;
c. 南京大学现代分析中心, 江苏省机动车尾气污染控制重点实验室, 江苏南京 210093;
d. 南水北调中线渠首环境检测应急中心, 河南南阳 473061
摘要:近年来,以雾霾为代表的大气污染问题严重影响到经济社会的可持续发展.其中,氮氧化物(NOx)的大量排放是导致雾霾天气的重要原因之一.氨选择性催化还原(NH3-SCR)是目前消除氮氧化物的主流技术,低温NH3-SCR更是广泛应用于钢铁、焦化、水泥、玻璃、陶瓷和垃圾焚烧等行业的烟气排放治理.传统的V2O5-WO3/TiO2催化剂活性温度高(300-400℃)且钒具有生物毒性,因此亟待开发环境友好的低温非钒基脱硝催化剂.最近,CeTiOx基催化剂由于在中高温段(250-400℃)表现出优异的脱硝性能而得到广泛关注.然而,该催化剂仍面临低温活性差及抗硫性能差的问题,制约了其工业化应用.研究显示,添加过渡金属可提高CeTiOx基催化剂的脱硝活性和抗硫中毒性能,这主要是因为过渡金属的添加可以有效改善催化剂的氧化还原性能和表面酸性.MoO3作为一种可以提供大量酸性位的氧化物,常被用作助剂改善钒钨钛催化剂的活性.研究显示,MoO3的引入可以促进催化剂中钒物种的分散度以及提高表面酸性.基于此,我们制备了一系列不同Mo含量的MoO3/CeTiOx催化剂,以期提高CeTiOx催化剂的低温脱硝性能及抗SO2中毒能力,并着重研究表面Mo的修饰对CeTiOx催化剂物理化学性质的影响.研究发现,表面Mo修饰可以显著提高CeTiOx的低温催化活性,其脱硝效率在150℃即可达到80%,同时抗SO2中毒能力也得到增强.进一步借助X射线衍射、比表面积测定、氢气程序升温还原、氨气程序升温脱附和X射线光电子能谱等方法对催化剂进行了全面表征分析.结果显示,表面Mo修饰对CeTiOx催化剂物理化学性质的影响与其脱硝性能有着密不可分的关系.首先,钼物种主要是以MoO3的形式存在于CeTiOx表面,其最佳的负载量为4 wt.%.其次,表面Mo的沉积显著提高了催化剂的表面酸量,尤其是Brönsted酸位的数量,而表面酸位的增加有利于催化剂吸附与活化反应物种NH3;同时,表面Mo修饰还减弱了硝酸盐在催化剂表面的吸附,进一步促使NH3-SCR反应按照Eley-Rideal机理顺利进行.最后,该催化剂在H2O和SO2存在的条件下仍具有最佳的脱硝性能,因而有望用于实际含SO2的低温烟气脱硝.
关键词氮氧化物消除    氧化铈-氧化钛催化剂    氧化钼表面修饰    二氧化硫中毒    表面酸性    

1 Introduction

Nitrogen oxides (NOx) are major air pollution emission in industrial processes and human activities, which need to be tightly controlled under stringent environmental regulations. Selective catalytic reduction of NO with NH3 (NH3-SCR) over V2O5-WO3/TiO2 catalyst is an efficient and cost-effective technology for eliminating NOx from stationary sources [1-3]. This process, however, can be operated only in a rather high and narrow temperature range of 300–400 ℃ [4, 5]. Unlike the case in a coal-fired power plant, the temperature of NOx-containing exhaust gases from other sources such as glass furnace, metallurgy sintering furnace and cement plant is often lower than 300 ℃ [6-9]. Moreover, the biological toxicity caused by vanadium species also limits the application of vanadium-based DeNOx catalysts. Hence, the design of vanadium-free SCR catalysts that are sufficiently active at low temperature is highly desired.

In the past few years, Ce-based oxides emerged as a promising candidate for vanadium-based NH3-SCR catalysts because of the high oxygen storage capacity (OSC) and facile Ce4+/Ce3+ redox cycle of CeO2 [6, 10-13]. Among them, Ce-Ti mixed oxide catalyst has drawn much attention because of its large surface area and good redox ability [14-16]. For instance, CeO2-TiO2 catalyst for NH3-SCR reaction was first synthesized by Xu et al. [17] and admirable catalytic performance was observed at 275–400 ℃. Afterwards, Gao et al. [18] explored the influence of preparation methods on the NH3-SCR performance of CeO2-TiO2 catalyst and found that the catalyst prepared by single step sol-gel showed better SCR activity. However, the poor low-temperature SCR activity and SO2 durability of these Ce-Ti-based catalysts still limit their practical application. Much effort to improve the low-temperature SCR catalytic performance of Ce-Ti-based catalysts has been made over the last several years. Among them, the introduction of other metal oxides to enhance their SCR activity has received considerable attention. The studies have proved that CeO2-TiO2 incorporated with various metals, such as Mn, W, Cu, Sn and Fe, achieved better NH3-SCR catalytic performance [19-23]. MoO3 was employed to increase the activity of traditional V-based deNOx catalyst [24]. Recently, Jiang et al. [25] prepared Ce-Mo-Ti oxide catalysts by a sol-gel method and found that the addition of Mo could improve the SCR activity of CeO2-TiO2 catalyst and its resistance to SO2 and H2O. Our study found that the incorporation of MoO3 into TiO2 could enhance the low-temperature activity and SO2/H2O resistance of CeO2/TiO2 catalyst by improving the properties of carrier [26]. Li et al. [27, 28] also revealed that the addition of MoO3 has a promoting effect on the activity and arsenic resistance of supported CeO2/TiO2 catalyst. Nevertheless, few studies have focused on supported MoO3/CeTiOx catalysts for NH3-SCR reaction, which were obtained only by deposition of MoO3 on CeTiOx support. Based on these findings, we considered that not only the supported MoO3/CeTiOx could be a novel promising NH3-SCR catalyst with high low-temperature activity and good durability of H2O/SO2, but also surface Mo modification alone is a good strategy to study the promoting effect of Mo on CeTiOx catalyst. Therefore, in this work, we attempted to develop a novel non-vanadium low-temperature NH3-SCR catalyst by only loading MoO3 on CeTiOx support. It was found that the addition of MoO3 has a noticeable promoting effect on the activity of CeO2-TiO2 for the NH3-SCR reaction. On the basis of the characterization results, the reason for the distinct promoting effect of MoO3 has been elucidated.

2 Experimental
2.1 Catalyst preparation

CeTiOx mixed oxides with different Ce/Ti mole ratios (4:1, 1:1, 1:4) were prepared by an inverse co-precipitation method. In a typical synthesis, requisite amounts of ammonium cerium(Ⅳ) nitrate and titanium(Ⅳ) tetrachloride were dissolved in distilled water at room temperature and stirred for 1 h, and then the obtained slurry was added dropwise into excess ammonia (25%) under stirring until pH = 10. The milky solution was kept stirring for another 2 h, followed by aging for 24 h. The obtained precipitate was filtered and washed with deionized water until no pH change or Cl residual (detected by the solution of AgNO3) was detected. The obtained powder was dried at 110 ℃ overnight and then calcined in flowing air at 550 ℃ for 3 h. The MoO3/CeTiOx catalysts were prepared by incipient-wetness impregnating the obtained CeTiOx supports with a proper amount of ammonium molybdate ((NH4)6Mo7O24·4H2O) solution, then dried at 110 ℃ and calcined at 500 ℃ for 3 h. For simplicity, the obtained MoO3/CeTiOx catalysts were denoted as yMo/CT, where y is the mass fraction of the loaded Mo.

2.2 Catalyst characterization

Powder X-ray diffraction (XRD) was performed on a Shimadzu XRD-6000 power X-ray diffractometer with Cu Kα radiation (λ = 1.5418 ). The data were collected at 2θ = 10°–80° with 8°/min scanning rate. Nitrogen adsorption-desorption isotherms were measured on a Micrometrics ASAP-2020 adsorption analyzer via the Brunauer-Emmett-Teller (BET) method at –196 ℃. The samples (0.1 g) were activated for 4 h at 300 ℃ before each adsorption measurement. X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS) analysis was implemented on a PHI 5000 Versa Probe system at an accelerating power of 15 kW, equipped with monochromatic Al K (1486.6 eV) radiation. The adventitious C 1s peak at 284.6 eV was used as calibration to compensate the charging effect of the binding energies (BE, ± 0.1 eV error) of the samples. H2-temperature-programmed reduction (H2-TPR) was carried out using a H2-Ar mixture (7 vol.% H2) as reducing agent. Typically, 50 mg sample was used in a quartz U-tube reactor for each measurement. NH3-temperature-programmed desorption (NH3-TPD) experiments were performed on a multifunction chemisorption analyzer with a quartz U-tube reactor, detected by a thermal conductivity detector (TCD). Raman spectra were collected on a Spex 1877 D triplemate spectrograph with 2 cm-1 resolution. A 532 nm DPSS diode-pump solid semiconductor laser was used as the excitation source with power output of ca. 5 mW. The in situ DRIFT spectra were collected on a Nicolet Nexus 5700 FTIR spectrometer with a scanning number of 32 at a resolution of 4 cm‒1, and a diffuse reflectance reaction cell (HARRICK) was used. For the experiments of NH3 or NO + O2 adsorption-desorption, the IR cell with sample was saturated with NH3 (1 vol.%) or NO + O2 (500 ppm NO and 5 vol.% O2) for 1 h at room temperature, then the sample was purged with N2 for 30 min, and the spectra were recorded at target temperature by raising the temperature from 50 ℃ to 400 ℃.

2.3 Catalytic performance measurements

The activity tests were carried out on a fixed-bed quartz reactor using a 0.25 g catalyst of 40–60 mesh. The feed gas mixture contained 500 ppm NO, 500 ppm NH3, 5% O2, 6% H2O (when used), 200 ppm SO2 (when used), and Ar as the balance gas. The total flow rate of the feed gas was 200 mL/min, corresponding to a GHSV of 48, 000 mL g1 h–1. The reaction temperature was increased from 100 to 400 ℃. The composition of the gas in the inlet and outlet streams was measured with a quadrupole mass spectrometer (Dycor Dymaxion DM300M, AMETEK) when the catalytic reaction reached steady-state condition at each test temperature point.

3 Results and discussion
3.1 NH3-SCR catalytic performance
3.1.1 Effect of Ce/Ti mole ratio and Mo loading on catalytic activity over Mo/CT catalysts

First, a series of Mo/CfT samples with different Ce/Ti mole ratios (f) were prepared to explore the influence of Ce/Ti molar ratio on NO conversion over Mo/CfT catalysts. Herein, the loading amount of Mo was fixed at 4 wt.%. As shown in Fig. S1, the order of NH3-SCR catalytic activity followed Mo/Ce4TiOx > Mo/Ce1TiOx > Mo/Ce0.25TiOx. The results of the catalytic activities indicated that Mo/CeTiOx catalyst exhibited the optimal NO conversion when the molar ratio of Ce/Ti was 4:1. Then, a series of yMo/Ce4TiOx samples with different Mo loadings were prepared and the NH3-SCR activity was tested. As shown in Fig. 1, activity test results showed that the pristine Ce4TiOx support had rather poor SCR activity in the whole operation temperature range (100–400 ℃) with the maximum NO conversion of 71% at 350 ℃. In contrast, the yMo/Ce4TiOx catalysts displayed much higher SCR activity in the temperature range of 200–400 ℃. Among which, 4Mo/Ce4TiOx sample exhibited a NO conversion of more than 90% within a broad operation temperature window (200–400  ℃) under the GHSV of 48000 mL g1 h–1. Most notably, the addition of Mo significantly increased the activity of Ce4TiOx catalyst in the low-temperature range, obtaining 4-fold increase in NO conversion compared to Ce4TiOx at 150 ℃ (from ca. 20% to ca. 80%). These results indicated that loading Mo on Ce4TiOx surface had a remarkable promoting effect on NH3-SCR activity especially at low temperature and the optimal loading amount was 4 wt.% Mo. Therefore, comparative studies between 4Mo/Ce4TiOx catalyst (Mo/CT for short in the following chapters) and Ce4TiOx support (CT for short) were conducted to elucidate the effect of MoO3 loading on NH3-SCR performance.

Fig. 1. NO conversions on these Mo/CT catalysts with different Mo contents and CT support.
3.1.2 Influence of SO2 and H2O on the NH3-SCR activity over CT and Mo/CT

The existence of sulfur dioxide and water vapor was unavoidable in the industrial application of NH3-SCR catalysts, so it is important to evaluate the influence of SO2 and water on the catalytic performance of our deNOx catalyst. Thus, the SO2 and H2O resistance of the Mo/CT catalyst during NH3-SCR reaction at 250 ℃ was evaluated through a long-time test, and the corresponding results are presented in Fig. 2. When 200 ppm SO2 was injected at 250 ℃ (Fig. 2A), the NO conversion of the Mo/CT catalyst decreased slightly at first and then was kept at about 94% during the test period. Meanwhile, the NH3-SCR activity of the CT sample was also measured in the presence of 200 ppm SO2 as a comparison. The results showed that the NO conversion over CT slowly decreased with an increase in time and was kept at ca. 40% after 24 h. Moreover, when 200 ppm SO2 and 5 vol% H2O were introduced into the reaction gas at the same time (Fig. 2B), the deactivation of the CT sample was much faster than that of Mo/CT. After 24 h, the NO conversion on the CT sample decreased from ca. 56% to ca. 29%, and the decline rate of the activity was 27%. However, the NO conversion over the Mo/CT sample still maintained at about 92%. The above results indicated that the Mo/CT catalyst exhibited above 90% NO conversion in the range of 200–400 ℃ and good H2O/SO2 resistance at 250 ℃ for NH3-SCR reaction. Therefore, the Mo/CT catalyst can be used to remove NOx from stationary pollution sources containing a certain amount of SO2 and H2O vapor because of its great catalytic performance.

Fig. 2. SO2 (a) and H2O+SO2 (b) resistance of the CT and Mo/CT catalysts at 250 ℃.
3.2 Catalyst characterization
3.2.1 Structural and textural characteristics (XRD, Raman and BET)

Fig. 3A presents the XRD patterns of CT and Mo/CT catalysts. Both samples exhibited the fluorite type crystalline structure without any phase segregation, characteristics of CeO2 (PDF-ICDD 34-0394) [29]. Furthermore, no diffraction peak attributed to MoO3 was detected in the XRD pattern of Mo/CT catalyst, which indicated that the molybdenum oxide was highly dispersed or presented as amorphous entities on the surface of CT [30]. To get further information of Mo species, Raman characterization was operated. It is well known that in comparison with XRD, Raman is more sensitive to distinguish the dispersion state of Mo. Fig. 3B displays Raman spectra of CT and Mo/CT samples. It shows that the two Raman spectra all exhibited a main band ascribed to the triply degenerate F2g mode of fluorite ceria and no Raman bands corresponding to MoO3 were detected, indicating that MoO3 was indeed present in the form of highly dispersed state on the surface of the CT support [31, 32]. Moreover, the Raman band intensity of the Mo/CT catalyst was weaker than that of the CT support, which also suggested that the highly dispersed MoO3 species on the surface of CT covered the support and weakened the signal [33]. These Raman results are in good agreement with XRD. We also noted that the F2g band of the Mo/CT catalyst shifted slightly from 451 to 444 cm‒1 owing to electronic interactions between MoO3 and CT support.

Fig. 3. XRD (A) and Raman (B) patterns of the CT and Mo/CT samples.

N2 adsorption/desorption isotherms of the samples were collected to understand the textural properties of CT and Mo/CT. It can be observed from Fig. 4A that both samples exibit type-IV isotherms according to IUPAC classification, showing the presence of mesoporous structure [34]. Besides, the H3-type hysteresis loops (P/P0 of 0.4–1.0) manifested the presence of irregular pores, which was revealed by the BJH pore distribution curves (Fig. 4B). Table 1 shows BET surface area and pore structure results of the two catalysts. The specific surface area and total pore volume of CT was 135 m2/g and 0.303 cm3/g, while that of Mo/CT was 101 m2/g and 0.273 cm3/g, respectively. The specific surface area and total pore volume of Mo/CT decreased owing to the blocking effect of the CT support by the deposited molybdenum oxide. However, the ABET values of CT and Mo/CT followed the opposite trend of the corresponding SCR activity. Therefore, we believe that the improvement of the SCR activity over Mo/CT catalyst cannot be attributed to the changes of specific surface area caused by molybdenum addition.

Fig. 4. N2 adsorption/desorption isotherms of the CT and Mo/CT samples (inset is BJH pore distribution curves).
Table 1
The results of BET, XPS, and NH3-TPD.
3.2.2 Surface chemical states analysis (XPS)

XPS experiments were conducted to explore the chemical states of surface species and the types of oxygen species over CT and Mo/CT samples, as presented in Fig. 5. For the Ce 3d XPS spectra in Fig. 5A, the bands labeled μ, μ', μ'', ν, ν' and ν'' represented the 3d104f0 state of Ce4+, whereas u' and v' represented the 3d104f1 state, corresponding to Ce3+ [6, 14]. It can be seen that the redox pair of Ce3+/Ce4+ was observed in the Mo/CT and CT catalysts. According to the area ratio of the peaks representing Ce3+ and Ce4+, the percentage of Ce3+ in the total Ce (Ce3+ and Ce4+) could be calculated. The addition of molybdenum to CT led to the slight increase in the percentage of Ce3+/(Ce3+ + Ce4+), which indicated there was interaction between the oxides of Mo and Ce. With regard to Mo 3d XPS spectra in Fig. 5B, two main peaks owing to Mo 3d5/2 and Mo 3d3/2 were observed at 232.2 and 235.6 eV, which were attributed to MoO3 or Mo6+ oxide [35, 36]. The O 1s XPS information of these samples was presented in Fig. 5C. The peak at 532.1 eV was considered as surface oxygen species (donated as Oα), and the band of Oβ at 529.2 eV was ascribed to lattice oxygen species. The Oα/(Oα + Oβ) ratio of all the samples were calculated by the area integral of Oα and Oβ. It was found that the relative concentration ratio of Oα over Mo/CT catalyst was lower than that of CT (Table 1), suggesting that the number of surface oxygen species decreased after the introduction of molybdenum.

Fig. 5. XPS spectra of Ce 3d (A), Mo 3d (B) and O 1s (C).
3.2.3 Redox properties

The redox properties of an NH3-SCR catalyst always play an important role in the NH3-SCR catalytic performance [37-39]. Thus, H2-TPR was carried out to evaluate the redox properties of CT and Mo/CT catalysts. As shown in Fig. 6, three reduction peaks were observed for the two samples, which were assigned to the reduction of the surface oxygen species of ceria (α), the reduction of surface Ce4+ (β), and the reduction of bulk of Ce4+ (γ), respectively [29, 40, 41]. In addition, the reduction of the well dispersed Mo species and surface Ti4+ was also likely to be included in peak β [28]. It is worth noting that loading Mo could slightly affect the reduction temperature for peak β. The β peak moved to higher temperature, from 570 ℃ for CT to 582 ℃ for Mo/CT, which was caused by the coverage of molybdenum oxides. Similar results were also obtained for vanadium and tungsten dispersed on CeO2 [42]. At the same time, the area of peak α over the Mo/CT sample attributed to the reduction of surface oxygen species obviously declined because of the loading of Mo. This phenomenon illustrated that Mo loaded on CT could decrease the number of labile surface oxygen and defect sites, leading to low reducibility of the catalysts. This deduction can be supported by the results of XPS spectra shown in Fig. 5. It is clear that the Oα signal representing surface chemisorbed oxygen was much higher for CT than for Mo/CT. These results were also in line with the observations of Li et al. [35]. In brief, the H2-TPR result manifested that the reducibility of Mo/CT was restrained compared with CT. According to the above characterization results and NH3-SCR activity in Fig. 1, the experiments of NH3-TPD and in situ DRIFTS were carried out to explore the reason for better catalytic activity of Mo/CT. The results may be more relevant for assessing the catalytic performance of the NH3-SCR catalysts because they were obtained under conditions very close to or even identical with those of the catalytic reaction.

Fig. 6. H2-TPR profiles of the CT and Mo/CT samples.
3.3 Adsorption properties
3.3.1 NH3-TPD

Surface acid properties of NH3-SCR catalysts are another crucial aspect affecting the catalytic activity apart from the redox property. Accordingly, NH3-TPD and in situ NH3 adsorption experiments were employed to evaluate the adsorption behavior of NH3 on the surface of CT and Mo/CT catalysts. First, the NH3-TPD experiment was performed to probe the number of acid sites in the CT and Mo/CT catalysts, and the corresponding results are shown in Fig. 7. It can be seen that the NH3-TPD profiles of CT and Mo/CT catalysts both exhibited four desorption peaks in the temperature range of measurements, which are labeled as Ⅰ, Ⅱ, Ⅲ, and Ⅳ. The Peak Ⅰ around 150 ℃ was assigned to the desorption of physisorbed NH3 species. Peak Ⅱ was attributed to weak acid sites, and the peaks Ⅲ and Ⅳ were ascribed to strong acid sites [14, 43]. The quantitative analysis results of NH3-TPD are summarized in Table 1. It shows that the total acidity of CT and Mo/CT was 0.49 and 0.68 mg/g, respectively. Evidently, the Mo/CT catalyst exhibited a remarkably increased total acid amount compared with CT, which suggested that Mo surface modification can effectively improve the surface acidity of Mo/CT catalyst to promote the adsorption of NH3 molecules, and finally enhance the NH3-SCR activity.

Fig. 7. NH3-TPD profiles of the CT and Mo/CT samples.
3.3.2 NH3-adsorption in situ DRIFTS

NH3-TPD can determine the total number of acid sites, but it fails to distinguish Brönsted acid sites and Lewis acid sites on catalyst surface. To ascertain the nature of acid sites and acquire more information of the increased acidity, NH3 adsorption in situ DRIFTS was carried out, and the corresponding results are depicted in Fig. 8. For the CT catalyst in Fig. 8A, after NH3 adsorption and N2 purge, several bands were detected in the range of 1000–2000 cm‒1. The bands at 1579 and 1181 cm‒1 were ascribed to coordinated NH3 bound to Lewis acid sites, and the weak band at 1440 cm‒1 could be related to the NH4+ species on Brönsted acid sites [19, 28, 44]. For the Mo/CT catalyst in Fig. 8B, the in situ DRIFT spectra of NH3 adsorption were obviously different from that of the CT catalyst. In addition to the band at 1183 cm-1 attributed to the coordinated NH3 linked to Lewis acid sites, a new band at 1672 cm‒1 assigned to NH4+ species bound to Brönsted acid sites was observed [18, 45, 46]. Moreover, the intensity of the band at 1433 cm‒1 ascribed to the NH4+ species bound to Br nsted acid sites was much stronger than that of the CT catalyst. With the temperature rising, all bands became weaker and the band intensity of Brönsted acid sites (1440, 1433, 1672 cm‒1) decreased faster than that of Lewis acid sites. This phenomenon indicated that NH3 bonded to Lewis acid sites was more stable than that bonded to Brönsted acid sites on catalyst surface. Combining with the NH3-TPD results, the weak acid should be related to the Brönsted acid and the strong acid was related to the Lewis acid. This meant that the loading of Mo could result in more Brönsted acid sites on the Mo/CT catalyst surface, and similar results were found on CeO2-MoO3 catalyst in Li's work [35]. Moreover, we can find that the area ratio of Brönsted acid sites to total acid sites over Mo/CT was much higher than that on CT in the low-temperature range (< 300 ℃) (Fig. S2). And, Mo/CT displayed the higher NO conversion in the same temperature range (Fig. 1). These phenomena suggested that the larger number of Brönsted acid sites caused by Mo addition played an important role in the improvement of catalytic activity in the low-temperature range over the Mo/CT catalyst for NH3-SCR reaction in the present work.

Fig. 8. NH3 adsorption in situ DRIFTS of (A) CT and (B) Mo/CT catalyst.
3.3.3 NO + O2-adsorption in situ DRIFTS

The in situ DRIFT experiments of NO + O2 co-adsorption were also employed to probe the surface adsorption the NOx species over the two catalysts. For the CT catalyst (Fig. 9A), several vibration bands attributed to adsorbed nitrate species were observed when it was exposed to NO + O2. According to the literature, the band at 1630 cm‒1 was ascribed to bridging bidentate nitrates, the bands at 1605 and 1217 cm‒1 were attributed to bridging monodentate nitrates, the band located at 1580 cm‒1 was assigned to bidentate nitrates, and the bands at 1530 and 1278 cm‒1 were assigned to monodentate nitrates. For the Mo/CT catalyst (Fig. 9B), when NO + O2 were introduced into the DRIFTS cell at 150 ℃, some bands attributed to adsorbed NOx species were also observed: bridged nitrates (1628, 1601, and 1227 cm‒1), monodentate nitrates (1524 and 1271 cm‒1), and bidentate nitrates (1577 cm‒1) [47-52]. The bands at 1349 cm‒1 attributed to ionic nitrate also appeared [53-55]. Compared with the NO + O2 spectra of the CT and Mo/CT samples, it is worth noting that the intensity of adsorbed NOx species on Mo/CT was significantly weaker than that on CT. Moreover, with increasing temperature, the band intensities of adsorbed NOx species became weaker gradually. Especially, the adsorbed NOx species on the Mo/CT catalyst disappeared completely at 300 ℃. The above results suggested that the highly dispersed molybdenum on Mo/CT not only resulted in more Brönsted acid sites formed on the catalyst surface, but also reduced the thermal stability of the inactive nitrate species, leaving more active sites available for the adsorption of NH3, both of which were favorable for the promotion of SCR activity.

Fig. 9. NO + O2 adsorption in situ DRIFTS of (A) CT and (B) Mo/CT catalysts.
3.4 Interaction with reactants (NH3 + NO + O2 co-adsorption in situ DRIFTS)

To investigate the reaction mechanism of NH3-SCR reaction over the CT and Mo/CT catalysts, in situ DRIFTS of NH3 + NO + O2 co-adsorption was performed, and the results are displayed in Fig. 10. When the CT sample was exposed to the NH3 + NO + O2 mixed gas at room temperature, bidentate nitrate (1563 cm‒1), monodentate nitrate (1520 and 1278 cm‒1), and bridging nitrate (1624 and 1228 cm‒1) were observed over the catalyst. Furthermore, combining the results of NH3 adsorption in situ DRIFTS, the band at 1444 cm‒1 related to NH4+ ions bonded on Brönsted acid sites was also detected. Along with the rise of temperature, the band of Brönsted acid sites disappeared at 200 ℃ due to the desorption of NH3 and the reaction between the adsorbed NH3 species and NOx species. More importantly, some interesting phenomena about adsorbed NOx species were observed during the heating process. The band of monodentate nitrate (1278 cm‒1) disappeared at 200 ℃ because of its poor thermal stability, and the band intensity of bidentate nitrate (1563 cm‒1) and bridging nitrate (1624 and 1228 cm‒1) increased with increasing temperature first and then decreased with a further increase in temperature, which was related to the reaction between the adsorbed NOx and NH3 species, as well as the transformation and dissociation of the adsorbed NOx species. However, these bidentate and bridging nitrates did not disappear even at 400 ℃ owing to the strong adsorption. With regard to the Mo/CT catalyst, the bands of bridging nitrate (1626 and 1227 cm‒1), bidentate nitrate (1600 and 1565 cm‒1), monodentate nitrate (1515 and 1262 cm‒1), and Brönsted acid (1433 cm‒1) were also detected at corresponding positions. And the variation of these bands was similar to that of the CT catalyst with an increase in temperature. More significantly, however, a new band at 1342 cm‒1 was observed, which was attributed to the intermediate species generated by the reaction of the adsorbed NH3 and NOx species [56]. This may be one reason that the Mo/CT catalyst displayed better catalytic performance than the CT catalyst for NH3-SCR reaction.

Fig. 10. NH3 + NO + O2 adsorption in situ DRIFTS of (A) CT and (B) Mo/CT catalysts.
4 Conclusions

A novel Mo-promoted CeO2-TiO2 catalyst has been developed for the selective catalytic reduction of NO by NH3, which showed high deNOx efficiency from 150 to 400 ℃. The redox properties and surface acidity of the MoO3/CeO2-TiO2 catalyst were affected markedly by the addition of Mo species, thereby modified the adsorption of NH3 and NOx on the catalyst surface. The improvement of SCR activity over MoO3/CeO2-TiO2 may be directly correlated to the increase in the number of Brönsted acid sites and weakly adsorbed NOx species, as opposed to a decrease in the BET surface area and a change in the redox properties. Our results can provide a scientific reference for the development of CeO2-based catalysts for practical applications.

References
[1]
C. X. Li, M. Q. Shen, J. Q. Wang, J. Wang, Y. P. Zhai, Ind. Eng. Chem. Res., 2018, 57, 8424-8435. DOI:10.1021/acs.iecr.8b01031
[2]
J. K. Lai, I. E. Wachs, ACS Catal., 2018, 8, 6537-6551. DOI:10.1021/acscatal.8b01357
[3]
T. F. Xu, X. D. Wu, Y. X. Gao, Q. W. Lin, J. F. Hu, D. Weng, Catal. Commun., 2017, 93, 33-36. DOI:10.1016/j.catcom.2017.01.021
[4]
T. H. Vuong, J. Radnik, J. Rabeah, U. Bentrup, M. Schneider, H. Atia, U. Armbruster, W. Grünert, A. Brückner, ACS Catal., 2017, 7, 1693-1705. DOI:10.1021/acscatal.6b03223
[5]
I. Song, S. Youn, H. Lee, S. G. Lee, S. J. Cho, D. H. Kim, Appl. Catal. B, 2017, 210, 421-431. DOI:10.1016/j.apcatb.2017.04.016
[6]
G. Gao, J. W. Shi, C. Liu, C. Gao, Z. Y. Fan, C. M. Niu, Appl. Surf. Sci., 2017, 411, 338-346. DOI:10.1016/j.apsusc.2017.03.164
[7]
C. Liu, G. Gao, J. W. Shi, C. He, G. D. Li, N. Bai, C. M. Niu, Catal. Commun., 2016, 86, 36-40. DOI:10.1016/j.catcom.2016.08.003
[8]
Z. Y. Sheng, D. R. Ma, D. Q. Yu, X. Xiao, B. J. Huang, L. Yang, S. Wang, Chin. J. Catal., 2018, 39, 821-830. DOI:10.1016/S1872-2067(18)63059-1
[9]
W. Li, C. Zhang, X. Li, P. Tan, A. L. Zhou, Q. Y. Fang, G. Chen, Chin. J. Catal., 2018, 39, 1653-1663. DOI:10.1016/S1872-2067(18)63099-2
[10]
S. Zhang, S. J. Liu, W. S. Hu, X. B. Zhu, R. Y. Qu, W. H. Wu, C. H. Zheng, X. Gao, Appl. Surf. Sci., 2019, 466, 99-109. DOI:10.1016/j.apsusc.2018.09.261
[11]
L. Kang, L. Han, J. He, H. Li, T. Yan, G. Chen, J. Zhang, L. Shi, D. Zhang, Environ. Sci. Technol., 2019, 53, 938-945. DOI:10.1021/acs.est.8b05637
[12]
L. Han, M. Gao, C. Feng, L. Shi, D. Zhang, Environ. Sci. Technol., 2019, 53, 5946-5956. DOI:10.1021/acs.est.9b01217
[13]
L. Han, M. Gao, J. Y. Hasegawa, S. Li, Y. Shen, H. Li, L. Shi, D. Zhang, Environ. Sci. Technol., 2019, 53, 6462-6473. DOI:10.1021/acs.est.9b00435
[14]
L. Zhang, L. L. Li, Y. Cao, Y. Xiong, S. G. Wu, J. F. Sun, C. J. Tang, F. Gao, L. Dong, Catal Sci. Technol., 2015, 5, 2188-2196. DOI:10.1039/C4CY01412J
[15]
D. W. Kwon, S. C. Hong, Appl. Surf. Sci., 2015, 356, 181-190. DOI:10.1016/j.apsusc.2015.08.073
[16]
X. L. Li, Y. H. Li, S. S. Deng, T. A. Rong, Catal. Commun., 2013, 40, 47-50. DOI:10.1016/j.catcom.2013.05.024
[17]
W. Q. Xu, Y. B. Yu, C. B. Zhang, H. He, Catal. Commun., 2008, 9, 1453-1457. DOI:10.1016/j.catcom.2007.12.012
[18]
X. Gao, Y. Jiang, Y. C. Fu, Y. Zhong, Z. Y. Luo, K. F. Cen, Catal. Commun., 2010, 11, 465-469. DOI:10.1016/j.catcom.2009.11.024
[19]
Z. Liu, J. Zhu, J. Li, L. Ma, S. I. Woo, ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces, 2014, 6, 14500-14508. DOI:10.1021/am5038164
[20]
W. P. Shan, F. D. Liu, H. He, X. Y. Shi, C. B. Zhang, Appl. Catal. B, 2012, 115-116, 100-106. DOI:10.1016/j.apcatb.2011.12.019
[21]
X. Gao, X. S. Du, L. W. Cui, Y. C. Fu, Z. Y. Luo, K. F. Cen, Catal. Commun., 2010, 12, 255-258. DOI:10.1016/j.catcom.2010.09.029
[22]
M. E. Yu, C. T. Li, G. M. Zeng, Y. Zhou, X. N. Zhang, Y. E. Xie, Appl. Surf. Sci., 2015, 342, 174-182. DOI:10.1016/j.apsusc.2015.03.052
[23]
Z. M. Liu, Y. X. Liu, B. H. Chen, T. L. Zhu, L. L. Ma, Catal. Sci. Technol., 2016, 6, 6688-6696. DOI:10.1039/C5CY02278A
[24]
Y. Qiu, B. Liu, J. Du, Q. Tang, Z. H. Liu, R. L. Liu, C. Y. Tao, Chem. Eng. J., 2016, 294, 264-272. DOI:10.1016/j.cej.2016.02.094
[25]
Y. Jiang, Z. M. Xing, X. C. Wang, S. B. Huang, Q. Y. Liu, J. S. Yang, J. Ind. Eng. Chem., 2015, 29, 43-47. DOI:10.1016/j.jiec.2015.04.023
[26]
L. L. Li, W. Tan, X. Q. Wei, Z. X. Fan, A. N. Liu, K. Guo, K. L. Ma, S. H. Yu, C. Y. Ge, C. J. Tang, L. Dong, Catal. Commun., 2018, 114, 10-14. DOI:10.1016/j.catcom.2018.05.015
[27]
X. Li, X. Li, J. Li, J. Hao, J. Hazard. Mater., 2016, 318, 615-622. DOI:10.1016/j.jhazmat.2016.07.058
[28]
Z. M. Liu, S. X. Zhang, J. H. Li, L. L. Ma, Appl. Catal. B, 2014, 144, 90-95. DOI:10.1016/j.apcatb.2013.06.036
[29]
Z. Y. Fei, Y. R. Yang, M. H. Wang, Z. L. Tao, Q. Liu, X. Chen, M. F. Cui, Z. X. Zhang, J. H. Tang, X. Qiao, Chem. Eng. J., 2018, 353, 930-939. DOI:10.1016/j.cej.2018.07.198
[30]
Z. M. Liu, H. Su, J. H. Li, Y. Li, Catal. Commun., 2015, 65, 51-54. DOI:10.1016/j.catcom.2015.02.028
[31]
W. Yu, J. Zhu, L. Qi, C. Sun, F. Gao, L. Dong, Y. Chen, J. Colloid Interfaces Sci., 2011, 364, 435-442. DOI:10.1016/j.jcis.2011.08.022
[32]
J. Zhu, F. Gao, L. H. Dong, W. J. Yu, L. Qi, Z. Wang, L. Dong, Y. Chen, Appl. Catal. B, 2010, 95, 144-152. DOI:10.1016/j.apcatb.2009.12.021
[33]
X. J. Yao, T. T. Kong, L. Chen, S. M. Ding, F. M. Yang, L. Dong, Appl. Surf. Sci., 2017, 420, 407-415. DOI:10.1016/j.apsusc.2017.05.156
[34]
X. J. Yao, K. L. Ma, W. X. Zou, S. G. He, J. B. An, F. M. Yang, L. Dong, Chin. J. Catal., 2017, 38, 146-159. DOI:10.1016/S1872-2067(16)62572-X
[35]
Y. Peng, R. Qu, X. Zhang, J. Li, Chem. Commun., 2013, 49, 6215-6217. DOI:10.1039/c3cc42693a
[36]
X. L. Hu, Q. Shi, H. Zhang, P. F. Wang, S. H. Zhan, Y. Li, Catal. Today, 2017, 297, 17-26. DOI:10.1016/j.cattod.2017.06.015
[37]
X. X. Wang, Y. Shi, S. J. Li, W. Li, Appl. Catal. B, 2018, 220, 234-250. DOI:10.1016/j.apcatb.2017.08.021
[38]
Y. R. Yang, M. H. Wang, Z. L. Tao, Q. Liu, Z. Y. Fei, X. Chen, Z. X. Zhang, J. H. Tang, M. F. Cui, X. Qiao, Catal. Sci. Technol., 2018, 8, 6396-6406. DOI:10.1039/C8CY01313F
[39]
H. Liu, Z. X. Fan, C. Z. Sun, Appl. Catal. B, 2019, 244, 671-683. DOI:10.1016/j.apcatb.2018.12.001
[40]
X. J. Yao, R. D. Zhao, L. Chen, J. Du, C. Y. Tao, F. M. Yang, L. Dong, Appl. Catal. B, 2017, 208, 82-93. DOI:10.1016/j.apcatb.2017.02.060
[41]
Y. Li, Y. Wan, Y. P. Li, S. H. Zhan, Q. X. Guan, Y. Tian, Appl. Catal. A, 2016, 528, 150-160. DOI:10.1016/j.apcata.2016.10.001
[42]
Z. L. Wu, A. J. Rondinone, L. N. Ivanov, S. H. Overbury, J. Phys. Chem. C, 2011, 115, 25368-25378. DOI:10.1021/jp2084605
[43]
Y. Xiong, C. J. Tang, X. J. Yao, L. Zhang, L. L. Li, X. B. Wang, Y. Deng, F. Gao, L. Dong, Appl. Catal. A, 2015, 495, 206-216. DOI:10.1016/j.apcata.2015.01.038
[44]
K. Liu, F. D. Liu, L. J. Xie, W. P. Shan, H. He, Catal. Sci. Technol., 2015, 5, 2290-2299. DOI:10.1039/C4CY01550A
[45]
Y. Peng, K. Z. Li, J. H. Li, Appl. Catal. B, 2013, 140-141, 483-492. DOI:10.1016/j.apcatb.2013.04.043
[46]
S. M. Lee, K. H. Park, S. C. Hong, Chem. Eng. J., 2012, 195-196, 323-331. DOI:10.1016/j.cej.2012.05.009
[47]
X. M. Wang, X. Y. Li, Q. D. Zhao, W. B. Sun, M. Tade, S. M. Liu, Chem. Eng. J., 2016, 288, 216-222. DOI:10.1016/j.cej.2015.12.002
[48]
X. J. Yao, L. Chen, J. Cao, F. M. Yang, W. Tan, L. Dong, Ind. Eng. Chem. Res., 2018, 57, 12407-12419. DOI:10.1021/acs.iecr.8b02830
[49]
F. D. Liu, H. He, Catal. Today, 2010, 153, 70-76. DOI:10.1016/j.cattod.2010.02.043
[50]
T. Zhang, R. Y. Qu, W. K. Su, J. H. Li, Appl. Catal. B, 2015, 176-177, 338-346. DOI:10.1016/j.apcatb.2015.04.023
[51]
W. Shan, F. Liu, H. He, X. Shi, C. Zhang, Chem. Commun., 2011, 47, 8046-8048. DOI:10.1039/c1cc12168e
[52]
X. L. Li, Y. H. Li, J. Mol. Catal. A, 2014, 386, 69-77. DOI:10.1016/j.molcata.2014.02.016
[53]
K. B. Nam, D. W. Kwon, S. C. Hong, Appl. Catal. A, 2017, 542, 55-62. DOI:10.1016/j.apcata.2017.05.017
[54]
J. Liu, X. Y. Li, Q. D. Zhao, J. Ke, H. N. Xiao, X. J. Lv, S. M. Liu, M. Tadé, S. B. Wang, Appl. Catal. B, 2017, 200, 297-308. DOI:10.1016/j.apcatb.2016.07.020
[55]
S. P. Ding, F. D. Liu, X. Y. Shi, K. Liu, Z. H. Lian, L. J. Xie, H. He, ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces, 2015, 7, 9497-9506. DOI:10.1021/acsami.5b00636
[56]
Z. R. Ma, X. D. Wu, Z. C. Si, D. Weng, J. Ma, T. F. Xu, Appl. Catal. B, 2015, 179, 380-394. DOI:10.1016/j.apcatb.2015.05.038