催化学报  2020, Vol. 41 Issue (11): 1692-1697      DOI: 10.1016/S1872-2067(20)63628-2   PDF    
扩展功能
加入收藏夹
复制引文信息
加入引用管理器
Email Alert
RSS
本文作者相关文章
Weiqiang Feng
Hui Chen
Qi Zhang
Ruiqin Gao
Xiaoxin Zou
Lanthanide-regulated oxygen evolution activity of face-sharing IrO6 dimers in 6H-perovskite electrocatalysts
Weiqiang Feng, Hui Chen, Qi Zhang, Ruiqin Gao, Xiaoxin Zou     
State Key Laboratory of Inorganic Synthesis and Preparative Chemistry, College of Chemistry, Jilin University, Changchun 130012, Jilin, China
* Corresponding author. Xiaoxin Zou, E-mail: xxzou@jlu.edu.cn
This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (21771079, 21621001), Fok Ying Tung Education Foundation (161011), the Postdoctoral Innovative Talent Support Program (BX20180120) and the China Postdoctoral Science Foundation (2018M641771), and the 111 Project (B17020)
Abstract: The development of efficient oxygen evolution electrocatalysts with reduced noble metal uses is a critical challenge for the deployment of various advanced energy conversion technologies. Here, a series of lanthanide-contained 6H-perovskites with a formula of Ba3LnIr2O9 (Ln=lanthanides) are investigated as oxygen evolution electrocatalysts, whose active subunits (i.e., face-sharing IrO6 dimers) can be regulated by the lanthanides in terms of catalytic activity. By using density functional theory (DFT) calculations, we establish the theoretical trend in activity for Ba3LnIr2O9 6H-perovskites, the activity of which is correlated with the difference of adsorption free energy (△GO-△GOH) between O* and OH* reaction intermediates. We further establish a volcano curve between △GO-△GOH and the calculated O p-band center. Among the Ba3LnIr2O9 6H-perovskites, Ba3LaIr2O9 locates at the peak of volcano curve, and correspondingly is the most active electrocatalyst due to the optimal O p-band property.
© 2020, Dalian Institute of Chemical Physics, Chinese Academy of Sciences.
Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
Key words: Lanthanide    Perovskite    Oxygen evolution reaction    O p-band center    Electrocatalyst    
镧系元素调控6H相钙钛矿中共面IrO6二聚体的产氧活性
冯尉强, 陈辉, 张琪, 高瑞芹, 邹晓新     
吉林大学化学学院无机合成与制备化学国家重点实验室, 吉林长春 130012
摘要:随着全球气候变暖的加剧和化石能源的日益枯竭,开发清洁无污染的可再生能源变得越来越重要.作为一种清洁无污染、能量密度高的能源载体,氢气被认为是极具应用前景的化石燃料替代品.电解水技术所得氢气纯度高,可以利用风能、太阳能、水能等可再生电能,是未来大规模工业产氢的理想路线之一.电解水过程包括阳极析氧反应和阴极析氢反应两个半反应.其中,阳极析氧反应具有更缓慢的反应动力学,成为水裂解过程的主要限速反应,影响整个电解水器件的效率.质子交换膜电解水技术是目前最先进的电解水技术.寻找在酸性条件下实现高效产氧反应速率的电催化剂对于开发下一代质子交换膜电解水技术具有重要意义.目前,铱的氧化物是在酸性条件下高效、稳定的催化剂.但是,其价格昂贵且资源储量低,不能适合大规模应用.因此,寻找低贵金属含量的高活性产氧催化剂迫在眉睫.本文以一系列含有镧系元素的6H相钙钛矿结构的Ba3LnIr2O9作为研究对象,探究了其在酸性条件下的产氧电催化性能(Ln代表镧系元素).我们发现,镧系元素可以调控Ba3LnIr2O9结构中共面的IrO6八面体活性亚结构单元.基于密度泛函理论(DFT)计算,我们建立了Ba3LnIr2O9系列结构的理论催化活性趋势,并发现其活性受反应中间吸附产物(吸附氧O*和吸附羟基OH*)的吸附自由能之差(△GO-△GOH)的调控.进一步,为了从电子结构方面揭示△GO-△GOH对催化活性的作用规律,我们计算了Ba3LnIr2O9系列的氧p带中心,并利用计算的氧p带中心和△GO-△GOH建立了典型的火山型曲线.其中位于火山型曲线顶点的Ba3LaIr2O9具有优化的氧p带中心和最佳的催化活性.Ba3LaIr2O9是这类Ba3LnIr2O9结构当中最有潜力的产氧催化剂.综上,本文通过DFT计算方法,研究了一系列低贵金属含量的Ba3LnIr2O9钙钛矿的电催化产氧活性,并筛选出了其中活性最优的Ba3LaIr2O9作为有潜力的OER电催化剂.这种通过DFT计算设计高效催化剂的方法有望加快实现各种新能源转换技术用催化剂的更新换代.
关键词镧系元素    钙钛矿    析氧反应    p带中心    电催化剂    

1 Introduction

Accelerating the discovery of new catalysts enabling high activity and cost efficiency is the key to the achievement of many current electrochemical energy conversion technologies toward reducing our dependence on non-renewable resources and mitigating the global warming crisis [1, 2]. In this regard, water splitting technologies have been the center subject of the spotlight. The oxygen evolution reaction (OER)—an anode reaction in water splitting—is severely encumbered by the sluggish kinetics involving four-proton/electron-coupled reaction process [3-6]. Proton exchange membrane (PEM) electrolyzer possesses many advantages compared with the alkaline electrolyzer, such as high loading flexibility, high current densities and voltage efficiency [3-5, 7, 8]. However, the implementation of these advantages is based on the premise of acid-resistant, highly active oxygen evolution electrocatalysts.

Although some electrocatalysts reported recently are found to be active for OER under harsh acidic operation conditions, the state-of-the-art electrocatalyst is still IrO2 due to the trade-off between activity and stability. IrO2 contains high content of expensive, scarce iridium, making it unfeasible for future large-scale commercialization [3-5, 9-14]. Therefore, it is urgent to develop highly active, stable and low-cost OER electrocatalysts. An effective protocol of reducing the usage of noble metal content is diluting the noble metal with earth-abundant materials, such as perovskites, pyrochlores and fluorite-like compounds [13, 15-18]. Recently, 6H-perovskite SrIrO3 is demonstrated by our group to contain 27.1 wt% less iridium than IrO2, but exhibits higher intrinsic catalytic activity for OER in acid [4]. The unique face-sharing IrO6 octahedral dimers (i.e., Ir2O9) are believed to be responsible for the high catalytic activity in this type of perovskites. However, the iridium content is still undesirable in 6H-perovskite SrIrO3, because besides the Ir2O9 dimers, there is another iridium-containing, auxiliary IrO6 octahedra in this structure. Therefore, it is of great interest to find new 6H-perovskites which contain lower iridium content than SrIrO3. A further systematical investigation on 6H-perovskites would be conducive to reveal the fundamental relationship of structural motifs and electrocatalytic activity. Such knowledge is also important for the prediction and rational design of efficient electrocatalysts for OER in acid.

In this work, we propose a class of lanthanide-contained, 6H-perovskites with a general formula of Ba3LnIr2O9 (Ln = lanthanides) as OER electrocatalysts, in which the iridium content reduced by 50.11 wt%–51.26 wt% in comparison with IrO2. We identify Ir2O9 octahedral dimers in this class of 6H-perovskites as the active subunits for OER, and their catalytic activities are regulated by the LnO6 octahedra that directly connects with Ir2O9 octahedral dimers. We further find that the catalytic activity is correlated with the difference of adsorption free energy (∆GO - ∆GOH) between O* and OH* reaction intermediates, and the calculated O p-band center. Finally, Ba3LaIr2O9 is identified as the most active catalyst among 6H-perovskites we studied, thanks to its optimal O p-band property.

2 Computational methods

The first-principle calculations are conducted by using plane-wave pseudopotential approach within the framework of density functional theory (DFT) as implemented in the Vienna Ab Initio Simulation Package (VASP) [19, 20]. The generalized gradient approximation formulated by Perdew, Burke, and Ernzerhof (PBE) is used as the exchange-correlation functional [21]. The electron-core interactions are described with the frozen-core projected augmented wave pseudopotentials [20]. A 400 eV cut-off energy for plane-wave basis set is used for all calculations. The convergence threshold for energy is set to 10-4 eV and for force is 0.05 eV/Å. 5×5×5 and 5×5×1 Monkhorst-Pack k-point grid is employed for the geometric optimization of bulk and slab models, respectively [22]. An 11×11×1 k-point grid is employed for projected density of states (PDOS) calculations. The correction of the van der Waals (vdW) interactions is considered by introducing DFT-D2 method [23]. The dipolar correction is included and the symmetrization is switched off for the calculations of the slab models. The crystal orbital Hamiltonian population (COHP) is calculated to analyze the chemical bonding of adjacent Ir atoms in Ir2O9 octahedral dimers, which has been implemented in the LOBSTER program [24-26]. Negative -COHP value indicates antibonding states, while the positive -COHP value means bonding states. The Fermi level is set to 0 eV.

O 2p-band center (ε2p) relative to the Fermi level was obtained by using the below equation [27]:

where ε is the energy referring to E - EFermi, and n2p (ε) is the projected density of states (PDOS) for O-2p orbital.

All the theoretical models of Ba3LnIr2O9 are assumed as P63/mmc space group, according to the structure reported by Doi et al. [28]. After optimization, by cleaving these optimized structures through the (001) plane, the corresponding slab models were obtained, with a 20 Å vacuum space to prevent the interaction between periodic images. All slab models have the thickness of six octahedral layers, and the upper 1/3 layers in the model are fully relaxed while the remaining kept frozen during the calculations.

The Gibbs free energy of each step for OER is computed according to the equation ΔG = ΔE + ΔZPE - TΔS. The ΔE is the energy differences obtained by DFT calculations. The values of ΔZPE are determined by the vibrational frequencies calculations and the values of TΔS are obtained from the standard tables for the gas phase molecules. The entropy for the adsorbate at the surface active site is assumed to be zero and the influence of temperature on the enthalpy is neglected in our calculations. Moreover, an external bias U is imposed on each step by introducing – eU in the calculation of free energy. Then, the reaction free energy of each elementary step can be expressed as following Eqs. (1-4) [19-21, 23]:

(1)
(2)
(3)
(4)

where EH2O and EH2 are the computed total energies for H2O and H2 molecules, respectively. The free energy of O2 is obtained from the reaction H2O → 1/2O2 + H2 by using the experimental free energy change of 2.46 eV per water molecule. E(*), E(HO*), E(O*) and E(HOO*) represent energies of the clean surface and oxygen-containing intermediate species adsorbed on the surface, respectively.

3 Results and discussion

The crystal structure of Ba3LnIr2O9 6H-perovskite adopts space group P63/mmc. As shown in Fig. 1(a), there are face-shared Ir2O9 octahedral dimers, which are alternatively connected with LnO6 octahedra in a corner-shared mode along the c-axis. Electron location function (ELF) was calculated to analyze the bonding characteristic of Ir-Ir bonds in the Ir2O9 octahedral dimers of Ba3LaIr2O9. Fig. 1(b) reveals that there is metallic feature between the Ir–Ir bonds in the Ir2O9 octahedral dimers. Additionally, we further investigate the Ir–Ir bonds of Ba3LnIr2O9 by calculating the crystal orbital Hamiltonian population (COHP). As shown in Fig. 1(c), there are two sharp peaks in the bonding state area below the Fermi level, indicating the strong interaction of Ir–Ir bonding in Ir2O9 octahedral dimers. The density of states (DOS) (Fig. 1(d)) shows a wide overlap between Ir 5d and O 2p orbitals, suggesting the strong orbital hybridization of Ir 5d and O 2p orbital in Ba3LaIr2O9. The DOS is cross the Fermi level, indicating the metallic behavior of Ba3LaIr2O9.

Fig. 1. (a) Crystal structure of Ba3LnIr2O9 series, the yellow and blue arrows point at the face-sharing Ir2O9 dimers and LnO6 octahedra, respectively; ELF image (b) and COHP (c) of Ir–Ir bond in Ba3LaIr2O9, (d) Density of states for Ba3LaIr2O9.

We investigate oxygen evolution activities of this class of 6H-perovskites according to adsorbate evolution mechanism (Fig. 2), which is a four-electron transfer pathway for OER proposed by Rossmeisl et al. [29, 30]. The four-electron transfer pathway for OER in acid can be expressed as below Eqs. of (5)–(8):

Fig. 2. Schematic of the adsorbate evolution mechanism for OER in acid.
(5)
(6)
(7)
(8)

where* represents surface active site. The HO*, O* and HOO* are the adsorbed intermediates on the surface active site. ∆GOH, ∆GO and ∆GOOH are the Gibbs adsorption energies of these intermediates, respectively. The most thermodynamically unfavorable reaction step for OER is defined as potential-determining step (PDS) (i.e., max{∆G(1–4)}/e). The theoretical overpotential is then expressed as the difference between the potential required by PDS and the equilibrium potential, 1.23 V.

We construct the theoretical models by cleaving the (001) plane of Ba3LnIr2O9 bulk structure to obtain the corresponding surface slabs with three possible atom-exposed surfaces (Fig. 3(a)), including the surface with exposed Ln atoms (labelled as surface Ln), the surface with exposed Ir-I atoms (labelled as surface Ir-I) and the surface with exposed Ir-II atoms (labelled as surface Ir-II). Ir-I and Ir-II represent the iridium atoms in IrO6 octahedra that indirectly and directly connect to the LnO6 octahedra, respectively. We calculate surface energies of the three possible surfaces (Fig. 3(b)), and find that the surface energies of the surface Ir-I and surface Ir-II are similar and smaller than that of surface Ln. This result indicates that the two iridium-containing surfaces are more favorable to be exposed, compared with the surface Ln. In addition, the surface Ln is found to be unable to adsorb oxygen-involved intermediates, indicating that the surface Ln cannot serve as the catalytic active surface for OER. Thus, we next discuss the catalytic activities of the surface Ir-I and surface Ir-II in a detailed way.

Fig. 3. (a) Three possible surface models of 6H-perovskite Ba3LnIr2O9 series by cleaving the (001) plane. The surface Ln, surface Ir-I and surface Ir-II are presented from the left to the right; (b) Surface energy scatter plot for 6H-perovskite Ba3LnIr2O9 series with different lanthanides with respect to surface Ln, surface Ir-I and surface Ir-II, respectively; (c) Gibbs free energy diagrams of Ba3LaIr2O9 for OER with additional potential of 1.23 V regarding to the surface Ir-I and surface Ir-II.

We calculate the theoretical overpotentials of Ba3LnIr2O9 series for OER for the surface Ir-I and surface Ir-II. Note that several Ba3LnIr2O9 perovskites (Ln = Pm, Eu, Yb) fail to adsorb the oxygen-containing intermediates, and thereby they are not included in our following discussion. We find that: (1) the PDS is the second step (i.e., ∆GO - ∆GOH) and third step (i.e., ∆GOOH - ∆GO) for the surface Ir-II and the surface Ir-I, respectively; (2) The overpotentials of Ba3LnIr2O9 series at surface Ir-II are significantly lower than those of the surface Ir-I (Fig. S1, Table S1 and Table S2 in the Supporting Information). The surface Ir-II of Ba3LnIr2O9 6H-perovskites exhibits excellent catalytic activity due to their small theoretical overpotential (ƞ) of < 0.5 V, which is smaller than that of IrO2 (ƞ = 0.59 V) [31]. For example, for Ba3LaIr2O9, the overpotential of the surface Ir-II for OER is 0.35 V, while the overpotential of the surface Ir-I for OER is 0.62 V (Fig. 3(c)). The superior activity of the surface Ir-II is due to the optimized adsorption free energy of O* intermediates, which results in a good balance between the second and the third steps involved in the OER. By contrast, the adsorption free energy of O* intermediates for the surface Ir-I is too strong compared with the surface Ir-II, leading to a higher potential needed for the third step for OER.

Considering the similar properties of lanthanides, Ba3LnIr2O9 is an ideal material system to reveal the underlying effects on the activity regularity. We correlate the overpotentials of surface Ir-II and surface Ir-I of Ba3LnIr2O9 with ∆GO - ∆GOH, a catalytic activity descriptor for OER. For the surface Ir-I, there is not a volcano plot relationship between ∆GO - ∆GOH and catalytic activity (Fig. S2 in the Supporting Information), suggesting that lanthanides do not have a regular influence on the surface Ir-I active sites. In contrast, for the surface Ir-II, a volcano plot is well constructed on the basis of theoretical overpotentials and activity descriptor, ∆GO - ∆GOH. As shown in Fig. 4, the Ba3LnIr2O9 all locate at the right side of the volcano plot, which suggests that the PDS is the second step—the deprotonation of OH* immediate to form O* immediate. The left side of the volcano plot suggests the PDS is the third step (i.e., the formation of OOH* intermedicate). It can be seen that the Ba3LaIr2O9 locates at the top peak of this volcano plots, suggesting the optimal catalytic activity for OER is realized by Ba3LnIr2O9. This result further demonstrates that the catalytic activity of the surface Ir-II can be regulated by varying lanthanides in the LnO6 octahedra to achieve the optimized ∆GO - ∆GOH. Among the series of Ba3LnIr2O9, it is believed that the most promising candidate catalyst for OER is Ba3LaIr2O9.

Fig. 4. The negative theoretical overpotential as a function of the ∆GO – ∆GOH for Ba3LnIr2O9 series.

In order to reveal the influence of electronic properties of Ba3LnIr2O9 on ∆GO - ∆GOH, we calculate the O p-bands of Ba3LnIr2O9. As shown in Fig. 5, a volcano curve trend is presented by the calculated O p-band center relative to Fermi level versus negative ∆GO - ∆GOH. The ∆GO - ∆GOH decreases with the O p-band center closer to Fermi level in the left side of the volcano curve, while the ∆GO - ∆GOH increases in the right side of the volcano curve when the O p-band center closer to the Fermi level. The above results indicate that a good electrocatalyst in Ba3LnIr2O9 requires an O p-band center neither too far nor too close to the Fermi level, which gives an optimized ∆GO - ∆GOH, and thereby a good electrocatalytic activity. It is worth noting that Ba3LaIr2O9 locates at the top peak of the volcano curves. This material has a moderate O p-band center and the minimum ∆GO - ∆GOH value, which refers to the optimal activity for OER.

Fig. 5. The volcano curves of the negative ∆GO – ∆GOH versus the calculated O p-band centers relative to Fermi level for Ba3LnIr2O9 series.

Apart from the activity of Ba3LnIr2O9, the thermodynamic stability is another important prerequisite factor for consideration. Therefore, we calculate the decomposition enthalpy of Ba3LaIr2O9 into the corresponding binary compounds. The decomposition enthalpy is defined as the energy difference between the decomposed products and the Ba3LaIr2O9 perovskite. The positive value of decomposition entropy means the endothermic reaction and thus difficult decomposition of Ba3LaIr2O9. Ba3LaIr2O9 has good thermodynamic stability with fairly large positive value of 3.79 eV. This result suggests that the Ba3LaIr2O9 is screened to be a promising candidate for OER, and its catalytic performance is worth exploring experimentally.

4 Conclusions

We have presented a new family of lanthanide-contained, 6H-perovskites with largely reduced iridium content as electrocatalysts for OER in acid. The face-shared Ir2O9 octahedral dimers in this class of 6H-perovskites are the active subunits for OER, and their catalytic activities can be regulated by the LnO6 octahedra. Among 6H-perovskites we studied, Ba3LaIr2O9 is identified as the most promising candidate toward OER, with small theoretical overpotentials. Experimental efforts should be encouraged to synthesize this prospective, highly active oxygen evolution electrocatalyst.

References
[1]
A. Grimaud, K. J. May, C. E. Carlton, Y.-L. Lee, M. Risch, W. T. Hong, J. Zhou, Y. Shao-Horn, Nat. Commun., 2013, 4, 2439. DOI:10.1038/ncomms3439
[2]
Z. W. Seh, J. Kibsgaard, C. F. Dickens, I. Chorkendorff, J. K. Nörskov, T. F. Jaramillo, Science, 2017, 355, eaad4998.. DOI:10.1126/science.aad4998
[3]
C. Shang, C. Cao, D. Yu, Y. Yan, Y. Lin, H. Li, T. Zheng, X. Yan, W. Yu, S. Zhou, J. Zeng, Adv. Mater., 2019, 31, 1805104..
[4]
L. Yang, G. Yu, X. Ai, W. Yan, H. Duan, W. Chen, X. Li, T. Wang, C. Zhang, X. Huang, J.-S. Chen, X. Zou, Nat. Commun., 2018, 9, 5236.. DOI:10.1038/s41467-018-07678-w
[5]
Y. Lin, Z. Tian, L. Zhang, J. Ma, Z. Jiang, B. J. Deibert, R. Ge, L. Chen, Nat. Commun., 2019, 10, 1-13. DOI:10.1038/s41467-018-07882-8
[6]
L. Huang, Y. Zou, D. Chen, S. Wang, Chin. J. Catal., 2019, 40, 1822-1840. DOI:10.1016/S1872-2067(19)63284-5
[7]
J. Lim, S. Yang, C. Kim, C. W. Roh, Y. Kwon, Y. T. Kim, H. Lee, Chem. Commun., 2016, 52, 5641-5644. DOI:10.1039/C6CC00053C
[8]
T. Fujigaya, Y. Shi, J. Yang, H. Li, K. Ito, N. Nakashima, J. Mater. Chem. A, 2017, 5, 10584-10590. DOI:10.1039/C7TA01318C
[9]
X. Li, W. Xue, R. Mo, S. Yang, H. Li, J. Zhong, Chin. J. Catal., 2019, 40, 1576-1584. DOI:10.1016/S1872-2067(19)63414-5
[10]
O. Diaz-Morales, S. Raaijman, R. Kortlever, P. J. Kooyman, T. Wezendonk, J. Gascon, W. T. Fu, M. T. M. Koper, Nat. Commun., 2016, 7, 12363.. DOI:10.1038/ncomms12363
[11]
Y. Chen, H. Li, J. Wang, Y. Du, S. Xi, Y. Sun, M. Sherburne, J. W. Ager, A. C. Fisher, Z. J. Xu, Nat. Commun., 2019, 10, 572. DOI:10.1038/s41467-019-08532-3
[12]
P. E. Pearce, C. Yang, A. Iadecola, J. Rodriguez-Carvajal, G. Rousse, R. Dedryvère, A. M. Abakumov, D. Giaume, M. Deschamps, J.-M. Tarascon, A. Grimaud, Chem. Mater., 2019, 31, 5845-5855. DOI:10.1021/acs.chemmater.9b01976
[13]
Z. Zhou, W. Q. Zaman, W. Sun, L. Cao, M. Tariq, J. Yang, Chem. Commun., 2018, 54, 4959-4962. DOI:10.1039/C8CC02008F
[14]
S. Geiger, O. Kasian, M. Ledendecker, E. Pizzutilo, A. M. Mingers, W. T. Fu, O. Diaz-Morales, Z. Li, T. Oellers, L. Fruchter, A. Ludwig, K. J. J. Mayrhofer, M. T. M. Koper, S. Cherevko, Nat. Catal., 2018, 1, 508-515. DOI:10.1038/s41929-018-0085-6
[15]
C. C. L. McCrory, S. Jung, I. M. Ferrer, S. M. Chatman, J. C. Peters, T. F. Jaramillo, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2015, 137, 4347-4357. DOI:10.1021/ja510442p
[16]
H.-S. Oh, H. N. Nong, T. Reier, A. Bergmann, M. Gliech, J. Ferreira de Araújo, E. Willinger, R. Schlögl, D. Teschner, P. Strasser, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2016, 138, 12552-12563. DOI:10.1021/jacs.6b07199
[17]
H. N. Nong, H.-S. Oh, T. Reier, E. Willinger, M.-G. Willinger, V. Petkov, D. Teschner, P. Strasser, Angew. Chem. Int. Ed., 2015, 54, 2975-2979. DOI:10.1002/anie.201411072
[18]
S. Park, Y. Shao, J. Liu, Y. Wang, Energy Environ. Sci., 2012, 5, 9331-9344. DOI:10.1039/c2ee22554a
[19]
G. Kresse, J. Furthmüller, Phys. Rev. B, 1996, 54, 11169-11186. DOI:10.1103/PhysRevB.54.11169
[20]
G. Kresse, D. Joubert, Phys. Rev. B, 1999, 59, 1758-1775.
[21]
J. P. Perdew, K. Burke, M. Ernzerhof, Phys. Rev. Lett., 1996, 77, 3865-3868. DOI:10.1103/PhysRevLett.77.3865
[22]
H. J. Monkhorst, J. D. Pack, Phys. Rev. B, 1976, 13, 5188-5192. DOI:10.1103/PhysRevB.13.5188
[23]
S. Grimme, J. Comput. Chem., 2006, 27, 1787-1799. DOI:10.1002/jcc.20495
[24]
V. L. Deringer, A. L. Tchougré, R. Dronskowski, J. Phys. Chem. A, 2011, 115, 5461-5466. DOI:10.1021/jp202489s
[25]
S. Maintz, V. L. Deringer, A. L. Tchougréeff, R. Dronskowski, J. Comput. Chem., 2013, 34, 2557-2567. DOI:10.1002/jcc.23424
[26]
S. Maintz, V. L. Deringer, A. L. Tchougréeff, R. Dronskowski, J. Comput. Chem., 2016, 37, 1030-1035. DOI:10.1002/jcc.24300
[27]
J. H. Montoya, A. D. Doyle, J. K. Nörskov, A. Vojvodic, Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys., 2018, 20, 3813-3818. DOI:10.1039/C7CP06539F
[28]
Y. Doi, Y. Hinatsu, J. Phys. Condens. Matter, 2004, 16, 2849-2860. DOI:10.1088/0953-8984/16/16/009
[29]
I. C. Man, H.-Y. Su, F. Calle-Vallejo, H. A. Hansen, J. I. Martínez, N. G. Inoglu, J. Kitchin, T. F. Jaramillo, J. K. Nørskov, J. Rossmeisl, ChemCatChem, 2011, 3, 1159-1165. DOI:10.1002/cctc.201000397
[30]
F. Shi, X. Zhu, W. Yang, Chin. J. Catal., 2020, 41, 390-403. DOI:10.1016/S1872-2067(19)63514-X
[31]
J. Rossmeisl, Z.-W. Qu, H. Zhu, G.-J. Kroes, J. K. Nörskov, J. Electroanal. Chem., 2007, 607, 83-89. DOI:10.1016/j.jelechem.2006.11.008