催化学报  2020, Vol. 41 Issue (11): 1754-1760      DOI: 10.1016/S1872-2067(20)63613-0   PDF    
扩展功能
加入收藏夹
复制引文信息
加入引用管理器
Email Alert
RSS
本文作者相关文章
Kai Huang
Shuai Guo
Ruyue Wang
Sen Lin
Naveed Hussain
Hehe Wei
Bohan Deng
Yuanzheng Long
Ming Lei
Haolin Tang
Hui Wu
Two-dimensional MOF/MOF derivative arrays on nickel foam as efficient bifunctional coupled oxygen electrodes
Kai Huanga, Shuai Guoa, Ruyue Wanga,b, Sen Lina,b, Naveed Hussainb, Hehe Weib, Bohan Dengb, Yuanzheng Longb, Ming Leia, Haolin Tangc, Hui Wub     
a. State Key Laboratory of Information Photonics and Optical Communications, School of Science, Beijing University of Posts and Telecommunications, Beijing 100876, China;
b. State Key Laboratory of New Ceramics and Fine Processing, School of Materials Science and Engineering, Tsinghua University, Beijing 100084, China;
c. State Key Laboratory of Advanced Technology for Materials Synthesis and Processing, Wuhan University of Technology, Wuhan 430070, Hubei, China
* Corresponding author. Kai Huang, Tel: +86-10-62282050; E-mail: huang-kai@bupt.edu.cn;
Ming Lei, Tel: +86-10-62282050; E-mail:mlei@bupt.edu.cn;
Haolin Tang, Tel: +86-27-87884448; E-mail: thln@whut.edu.cn
This study is supported by the National Natural Science Foundations of China (51902027, 61874013, 51976143, 61874014, 61674019, 61974011), National Basic Research of China (2015CB932500), Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities (2019RC20) and Fund of State Key Laboratory of Information Photonics and Optical Communications (Beijing University of Posts and Telecommunications, P.R. China)
Abstract: Oxygen electrocatalysis, exemplified by the oxygen reduction reaction (ORR) and oxygen evolution reaction (OER), is central to energy storage and conversion technologies such as fuel cells, metal-air batteries, and water electrolysis. However, highly effective and inexpensive earth-abundant materials are sought after to replace the noble metal-based electrocatalysts currently in use. Recently, metal-organic frameworks (MOFs) and carbon-based MOF derivatives have attracted considerable attention as efficient catalysts due to their exceedingly tunable morphologies, structures, compositions, and functionalization. Here, we report two-dimensional (2D) MOF/MOF derivative coupled arrays on nickel foam as binder-free bifunctional ORR/OER catalysts with enhanced electrocatalytic activity and stability. Their remarkable electrochemical properties are primarily attributed to fully exposed active sites and facilitated charge-transfer kinetics. The coupled and hierarchical nanosheet arrays produced via our growth-pyrolysis-regrowth strategy offer promise in the development of highly active electrodes for energy-related electrochemical devices.
© 2020, Dalian Institute of Chemical Physics, Chinese Academy of Sciences.
Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
Key words: 2D MOFs    Derivative    Coupled arrays    Binder-free    Oxygen electrode    
泡沫镍负载二维金属有机框架及其衍生物耦合阵列用于高活性双效氧电极
黄凯a, 郭帅a, 王茹玥a,b, 林森a,b, 纳韦德·侯赛因b, 魏呵呵b, 邓铂翰b, 龙圆正b, 雷鸣a, 唐浩林c, 伍晖b     
a. 北京邮电大学理学院, 信息光子学与光通信国家重点实验室, 北京 100876;
b. 清华大学材料科学与工程学院, 新型陶瓷与精细加工国家重点实验室, 北京 100084;
c. 武汉理工大学材料复合新技术国家重点实验室, 湖北武汉 430070
摘要:氧电催化一般涉及到氧还原反应(ORR)和氧析出应(OER),是诸如燃料电池,金属空气电池和水电解池等能源转换与存储技术的关键步骤.其中,可充电的金属锌空气电池具有较高的能量密度,开发成本较低,运行安全且环境友好.然而,开发并采用高效,低成本且储量丰富的催化材料代替贵金属基电催化剂,仍旧是现阶段尚未完全解决的问题和挑战.最近,金属有机框架(MOFs)以及碳基的金属有机框架衍生物作为高效电催化剂,因其超乎寻常的形貌,结构,组分和功能性的可调节能力,已经逐渐引起了广泛的关注和研究兴趣.因此,本文报道了一种泡沫镍负载的二维金属有机框架及其衍生物耦合阵列作为无粘结剂型ORR/OER双效催化剂,能够实现高比表面积,高电导率和高双功能性,同时避免了使用有机粘结剂的复杂制备过程和不可避免的电池性能影响.与传统设计不同,本文主要通过集成各司其职的不同功能组分并充分暴露电化学活性面积来提高双效电极的整体活性.电化学测试结果表明,耦合阵列电极(R-NCM)相比于MOFs阵列(NCM)和MOFs衍生物阵列(A-NCM)等对比电极,具有显著提高的双效氧电极性能,氧还原反应的起峰电位约为0.90V,而氧析出反应电流密度达到100mA cm-2时的过电势为319mV.由于其在生长-热裂解-再生长过程中所具有的稳定的站立多级二维纳米片结构,所制备的双效氧电极材料表现出显著增强的双官能团性,电化学活性面积,反应动力学和稳定性,并可进一步用于可充电的金属锌空气电池(ZABs).考虑到制备过程的可行性与简洁性,所提出的生长-热裂解-再生长策略不仅能够用于耦合型分级纳米片阵列结构的合成,还能为设计开发相关能源电化学装置的高活性电极结构提供借鉴.
关键词二维金属有机框架    衍生物    耦合阵列    无粘结剂    氧电极    

1 Introduction

Due to the rapid development of consumer electronics and electric vehicles, an urgent and ever-increasing demand for advanced energy generation and storage systems with high energy and rate densities has emerged. Theoretically, rechargeable metal-air battery technologies offer extremely high energy capacities; zinc-air batteries (ZABs) in particular, are affordable, safe, and eco-friendly [1-3]. However, low efficiency and poor cycling performance hinder the practical application of these technologies. A key, but equally challenging, approach is to design an appropriate porous air electrode structure, with typical requirements of high surface area, high electrical conductivity, and superior bifunctional electrocatalytic activity, for the oxygen reduction reaction (ORR) and oxygen evolution reaction (OER) [4, 5]. Conventionally, most air electrodes are fabricated by bonding noble metal or non-precious powder catalysts onto a current collector using a polymer binder, e.g., Nafion, polyfluortetraethylene polymer, or PVDF; this often involves complex procedures and has a negative impact on overall battery performance [6-8]. The resulting electrode usually lacks direct electric contact with the catalyst and substrate, which hinders ion and electron transport in the systems, causing a high-charge overpotential and low round-trip efficiency owing to electrode polarization [9]. Moreover, the addition of a binder to electrodes leads to undesirable inactive volume and increases side reactions. To address these issues, binder-free bifunctional electrodes that can be utilized directly for rechargeable metal-air batteries are desired.

Diversified metal-organic frameworks (MOFs) and MOF-derived materials have recently attracted considerable interest as promising alternatives to noble metal electrocatalysts, owing to their large surface areas, large pore volumes, uniform pore distributions, and tunable chemical structures [10-12]. Moreover, MOF structures can be either free-standing or supported on various substrates, and can be well-controlled in one-, two-, or three-dimensions simply by varying the constituent geometries of metal ions/centers and organic linkers [13, 14]. To develop MOF-based ORR/OER bifunctional electrodes, various efforts have been made to transfer intrinsic MOFs containing abundant carbon and nitrogen species into transition metal compounds or N-doped nanocarbon hybrid catalysts with improved catalytic performance [15]. Since most MOF-derived nanocarbon/metal oxide catalysts have exhibited unsatisfactory electrochemical activity [16], precise control of pyrolytic conditions to optimize the morphology, structure, and composition is required. However, MOF-derived electrocatalysts formed via high-temperature pyrolysis recently have demonstrated reduced OER performance compared to non-nitrogenous intrinsic MOFs [17]. Therefore, it remains a great challenge to design and fabricate highly active transition metal MOF-based and binder-free bifunctional oxygen electrodes with fast kinetics for four-electron (4 e-) processes [18].

Herein, we develop a nickel-foam-supported NiCo-MOF-based oxygen electrode using a growth-pyrolysis-regrowth strategy with well-defined two-dimensional (2D) MOF/MOF derivative coupled arrays and high oxygen electrode catalytic bifunctionality performance. In contrast to traditional and current designs, we explore electrode activity by integrating various functional components and increasing the exposure of active electrochemical area. The 2D MOF/MOF derivative coupled arrays (R-NCM) exhibit an on-set potential of ~0.90 V for the ORR and 100 mA cm-2 at an overpotential of 319 mV for the OER; these values are clearly enhanced relative to those of controlled samples of first-growth NiCo-MOFs (NCM) and their pyrolytic derivative (A-NCM). The overall superior ORR/OER performance results from a significantly increased electrochemical active surface area and enhanced reaction kinetics, as confirmed by double-layer capacitances (Cdl) and charge-transfer resistance measured by cyclic voltammetry (CV) and electrochemical impedance spectroscopy (EIS), respectively.

2 Experimental
2.1 Materials

Nickel acetate (Ni(Ac)2·4H2O, 98%, Sinopharm Chemical Reagent), cobalt nitrate hexahydrate (Co(NO3)2·6H2O, 99%, Sigma-Aldrich), 2, 6-naphthalenedicarboxylic acid dipotassium (C10H6(CO2K), 95%, Sigma-Aldrich), hydrochloric acid (HCl, 37%, Sinopharm Chemical Reagent), and ethanol (C2H6O, 99.7%, Aladdin) were used as received without further purification.

2.2 Synthesis of NiCo-based MOFs (NCMs)

A 2D NCM array on a Ni foam (NF) substrate was grown directly via a facile hydrothermal reaction. Typically, a piece of Ni foam (4 cm ×6 cm × 1.6 mm) was first cleaned to remove surface oils and the oxide layer, using repeated ultrasonic treatment in HCl solution (6 M), followed by acetone and deionized (DI) water. Next, the freshly-cleaned nickel foam was quickly immersed into a prepared reaction system containing 60 mL of DI-water (18 MΩ cm-1), 160 mg of Ni(Ac)2·H2O, 40 mg of Co(NO3)2·6H2O, and 200 mg of organic ligand, 2, 6-naphthalenedicarboxylate tetrahydrate. After further reaction at 60 ℃ for 20 h, the mixture was cooled to room temperature, and the final NCM samples were rinsed with excess DI-water with light ultrasonic treatment, then dried at room temperature.

2.3 Synthesis of annealed (A-NCM) and regrown NiCo-based MOFs (R-NCMs)

The A-NCM samples were directly derived from as-prepared NMC using a typical pyrolysis method, where NMC was annealed in N2 atmosphere at 650 ℃ for 2 h with a ramp rate of 2 ℃ min-1. Next, R-NCM samples were prepared similar to A-NCM samples, with some modifications; the reaction system contained 60 mL of DI-water, 96 mg of Ni(Ac)2·H2O, 24 mg of Co(NO3)2·6H2O, and 120 mg of organic ligand, 2, 6-naphthalenedicarboxylate tetrahydrate.

2.4 Material characterization

Sample morphologies were observed with transmission electron microscopy (TEM, JEM-2100F, Japan) and scanning transmission electron microscopy (FE-SEM, S-4800, Japan) equipped with energy dispersion spectra (EDS) and elemental mapping. X-ray diffraction (XRD) patterns were acquired using a D/MAX 2500 diffractometer (Rigaku, Japan) fitted with Cu Kα radiation. X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS) was conducted on a Thermo Scientific ESCALAB 250Xi with Al Kα (1487.6 eV) as the excitation source and C 1s peak (284.8 eV) as the calibration [19].

2.5 Electrochemical measurements

To evaluate bifunctional electrocatalytic activity, OER and ORR polarization curves were measured at room temperature in 1 M KOH aqueous solution with a typical three-electrode system on an electrochemical workstation (CHI760E, Shanghai, China). All polarization curves were iR-corrected and performed at a scan rate of 5 mV s-1, with a carbon rod as the counter electrode, a saturated AgCl as the reference electrode, and the active material on nickel foam as the working electrode. All potentials were calculated with respect to the reversible hydrogen electrode (RHE), based on the formula: ERHE = EAgCl + 0.059 × pH + 0.197 V. Electrochemical stability was further evaluated by the accelerated durability test (ADT) using cyclic voltammetry (CV) in the ranges 1.1 to 1.7 V for the OER and 0.45 to 1.0 V for the ORR, with a scan rate of 100 mV s-1. Cyclic voltammetry curves were measured under different scan rates to determine the electrochemical surface area (ECSA). Electrochemical impedance spectra (EIS) were measured at 1.6 V for the OER and 0.8 V vs. RHE for the ORR [20, 21].

2.6 Zn-air batteries experiments

The Zn-air battery tests were performed with a homemade cell configuration using a LANBTS BT-2016C system to carry out the cycling test (10 min for each discharge and charge period). The Zn-air battery was assembled using the as-prepared R-NCM, A-NCM, or NCM electrodes as cathodes, and a fresh polished Zn plate (~1 mm thick) as the anode. The alkaline aqueous electrolyte was composed of 0.2 M ZnCl2 and 6 M KOH solutions.

3 Results and discussion

As illustrated in Fig. 1, the synthesis of 2D R-NCM coupled arrays on Ni foam using a growth-pyrolysis-regrowth strategy with Ni2+, Co2+, and 2, 6-naphthalenedicarboxylate tetrahydrate as organic ligand is proposed. Briefly, we fabricate 2D NiCo-based MOFs according to a typical hydrothermal synthesis at 60 ℃, then yield 2D MOF derivatives annealing in N2 atmosphere. During the process, A-NCM turns dark black and R-NCM becomes a mixed black and light green film (Fig. S1), demonstrating the corresponding changes in each step. The morphology of relevant samples was further characterized by SEM and TEM. Compared to the cellular-structured NCM samples formed by vertically grown ultrathin nanosheets (Figs. 2(a) and S2), thicker flakes of stacked nanosheets appeared in A-NCM after annealing (Figs. 2(b) and S3), while denser MOF nanosheets filled the interspaces by regrowth in R-NCM (Fig. 2(c)). The NCM nanosheets have a lateral size of several hundred nanometers (Fig. 2(d)) with a smooth, well-defined morphology. Uniformly distributed nanoparticles (dominated by metallic Ni and Co) were observed on the annealed MOF-derived nanoflakes (Figs. 2(e) and S4). TEM, HR-TEM, and selected-area electron diffraction (SAED) images were collected where NCM and A-NCM appeared simultaneously in order to further determine the configurations of R-NCM (Figs. 2(f)-(m), S5 and S6). In accordance with our design, we confirmed the coexistence of 2D MOFs and MOF derivative coupled nanosheets with metallic Ni, Co, and C phases, as shown in Fig. 2(f) and 2(g). Moreover, the crystalline metal nanoparticles are encased by few-layer graphene, due to Ni nanocrystal catalysis during the annealing process [22-24], with an average diameter of about 10 nm and a homogeneous distribution of various elements.

Fig. 1. Schematic illustration toward realizing 2D Ni/Co-based MOF/MOF derived coupled arrays from pure NF to R-NCM sample. The strategy includes a growth-pyrolysis-regrowth process on the surface of nickel foam substrate.
Fig. 2. Morphological characterization of NCM, A-NCM and R-NCM samples. (a-c) SEM images; (d-f) TEM images; (g) Selected area electron diffraction (SAED) pattern; (h, i) HRTEM images and (j, m) elemental mapping images of R-NCM.

The configuration of R-NCM with pristine MOFs and NiCo@C 2D arrays was also confirmed by XRD patterns and XPS spectra, as shown in Fig. 3. After annealing, the original peaks belonging to MOF nanosheets disappear and several new peaks are observed, which are ascribed to the (111), (200), and (220) planes of metallic Ni and C (002), respectively. Consistent with TEM results, organic ligands in MOFs transform into graphene and metal nodes form the nanoparticles, while maintaining their 2D features in both the A-NCM and R-NCM samples. In addition, XPS results were further analyzed to investigate changes in the chemical state of the MOF structure. The XPS survey spectra, shown in Fig. S7, indicate the Ni, Co, C, and O are present, in good agreement with elemental mapping results. As shown in Fig. 3(b) and 3(c), additional characteristic peaks of metallic Ni 2p1/2 (852.9 eV), Ni 2p3/2 (870.4 eV), and Co 2p3/2 (778.7 eV) are observed in R-NCM and A-NCM, which illustrates the reduction of Ni and Co nodes to metallic atoms during pyrolysis [25-30]. Significantly, two evident shifts: Co2+ 2p3/2 peak to lower binding energy and Ni2+ 2p3/2 peak to higher binding energy, are observed for R-NCM compared to NCM. This implies a strong interaction between the Co and Ni species and indicates that the local electronic structure of the Ni centers is modified via partial electron transfer from Ni2+ to Co2+ through the oxygen of the ligand [25-28]. The XPS spectrum of C 1s for NCM (Fig. 3(d)) shows two peaks at 284.8 and 288.4 eV, corresponding to the sp2 hybridized C-C and O=C-O groups, respectively [31]. However, in the A-NCM and R-NCM samples, the peak related to O=C-O groups disappears and a peak assigned to C-O (286.2 eV) emerges [32], which confirms partial loss of oxygen due to carbonization. Disappearance of O=C-O is also observed in O 1s spectra (Fig. 3(e)) after annealing, where typical XPS peak corresponding to Ni-O bond at 530.1 eV is also confirmed for A-NCM and R-NCM [31, 33].

Fig. 3. Structural and compositional characterization of NCM, A-NCM and R-NCM samples. (a) XRD patterns; (b-e) the high-resolution XPS spectra of Ni 2p, Co 2p, C 1s and O 1s.

To test oxygen electrode performance, R-NCM and other controlled samples were immersed directly in 1 M KOH electrolyte as working electrodes. For OER, NCM requires an overpotential (ηOER) of only 313 mV to reach a current density of 100 mA cm-2 (Fig. 4(a)), while A-NCM needs a larger overpotential of 366 mV. This illustrates that the OER performance of NiCo-based MOFs is degraded by annealing, but can be recovered by R-NCM (overpotential of 319 mV), due to the regrown MOF nanosheet array. The Tafel slopes for NCM and R-NCM are 86 mV dec-1 and 78.2 mV dec-1 (Fig. 4(c)), much smaller than those of A-NCM (89.1 mV dec-1) and NF (194.8 mV dec-1), suggesting favorable OER kinetics for R-NCM. During the ORR, A-NCM and R-NCM electrodes exhibit enhanced activity, with an onset potential of 0.90 V and current densities of 91.1 and 82.1 mA cm-2 at 0.45 V, respectively (Fig. 4(b)). This demonstrates that the electrochemical catalytic performance for the ORR improves dramatically after annealing.

Fig. 4. Electrocatalytic properties of R-NCM, A-NCM, NCM and NF for OER and ORR. (a) OER polarization curves (c) the corresponding Tafel plots; (b) ORR polarization curves and (d) the corresponding Tafel plots; (e) OER polarization curves of R-NCM before and after 1000 and 5000 cycles; (f) ORR polarization curves of R-NCM before and after 1000 and 5000 cycles.

In order to better understand the electrochemical reaction kinetics, the corresponding Tafel plots were further analyzed (Fig. 4(d)). A-NCM and R-NCM have much lower Tafel slopes (63.2 and 77.4mV dec-1, respectively) compared to NCM (296.2 mV dec-1) and NF (234.6 mV dec-1), demonstrating their intrinsically favorable activity and kinetics for the ORR after annealing. Therefore, in general, the R-NCM electrode exhibits superior ORR/OER bifunctional electrocatalytic activity than A-NCM, NCM, and other reported results (Table S1). According to previous reports [17, 33], the proposed active sites can be attributed to oxidized Ni metal nodes in MOFs (such as NiO6/NiOOH species); for OER, additional structural vacancies are introduced by trace Co moieties, while the transition metal particle-activated 2D carbon layers impart synergistic effects in MOF derivatives for ORR.

The stability of the R-NCM electrode was confirmed (presented in Fig. 4(e) and 4(f)); over 5000 CV cycles, negligible degeneration was observed, due to the stable morphology and structure (Fig. S8) [34]. To further confirm the stability of the materials, we also tested the catalytic stabilities of R-NCM electrodes for the ORR and OER using a typical chronoamperometry (CA) method. As shown in Fig. S9, the R-NCM sample exhibits minor degradation after 12 h CA testing, with reductions of ~9% and ~12% in the OER and ORR activity, respectively.

Inspired by the outstanding bifunctional activity and stability of R-NCM, we investigated its practical application by integrating it as an air electrode in a rechargeable zinc-air battery (Figs. S10 and S11). The Zn-air batteries with a R-NCM air cathode exhibited the best discharge ability and highest peak power density of 45.2 mW cm-2. Zinc-air battery performance was evaluated by pulse discharge-charge tests using a current density of 10 mA cm-2 with a fixed capacity of 17.7 mAh (20 min per cycle). The charging-discharging potential gap was maintained at approximately 0.9 V throughout the experiment, after full activation for 50 h, which indicates excellent stability and capacitance for the R-NCM-based battery. In addition, a green LED powered by two battery units integrated in series is displayed as well; this suggests great potential for energy storage applications.

For additional insight, the electrochemical surface area (ECSA) was measured and electrochemical impedance spectroscopy (EIS) were collected, as illustrated in Figs. S12 and S13. Double-layer capacitances (Cdl) were evaluated by cyclic voltammetry (CV) to measure ECSA, with a result of 72.5 mF cm-2 for R-NCM, compared to 6.5 mF cm-2 for A-NCM and 1.5 mF cm-2 for NCM, indicating that R-NCM has more accessible active surface area. The increased ESCA of R-NCM may be attributed to the A-NCM/NCM interfacial structure, which provides more surface-active sites for the ORR and OER. Furthermore, R-NCM and other sample-based catalysts show two semicircles in the high- and low-frequency regions of Nyquist plots, which can be fitted with common equivalent circuits (inset of Fig. S13) with charge-transfer resistance (Rct) and solution resistance (Rs), respectively [35]. Notably, R-NCM not only possesses a smaller Rct of 4.31 Ω for OER, but also Rct of 148 Ω for ORR, in contrast to other samples, which contributes to its optimized activity. Therefore, the prominent activity of R-NCM can be derived from synergistic effects of the 2D metal organic framework and its derivative arrays, favorable charge-transfer kinetics, and increased intrinsic active sites [36-38].

4 Conclusions

In summary, we fabricated an advanced bifunctional oxygen electrode with vertically grown 2D NiCo-based MOFs and their derivatives and evaluated each by their OER and ORR electrocatalytic performance. Due to the robust freestanding and hierarchical structure achieved by the growth-pyrolysis-regrowth process, the resultant R-NCM-based electrode exhibits significantly enhanced bifunctionality, kinetics, and stability as an air-cathode in rechargeable Zn-air batteries. Considering feasibility and simplicity, our design strategy can be extended to the fabrication of other efficient self-supporting electrocatalysts with advanced nanostructures.

References
[1]
D. Ji, L. Fan, L. Li, S. Peng, D. Yu, J. Song, S. Ramakrishna, S. Guo, Adv. Mater., 2019, 31, 1808267. DOI:10.1002/adma.201808267
[2]
J. Yi, P. Liang, X. Liu, K. Wu, Y. Liu, Y. Wang, Y. Xia, J. Zhang, Energy Environ. Sci., 2018, 11, 3075-3095. DOI:10.1039/C8EE01991F
[3]
D. Stock, S. Dongmo, J. Janek, D. Schröder, ACS Energy Lett., 2019, 4, 1287-1300. DOI:10.1021/acsenergylett.9b00510
[4]
D. U. Lee, J. Y. Choi, K. Feng, H. W. Park, Z. Chen, Adv. Energy Mater., 2014, 4, 1301389. DOI:10.1002/aenm.201301389
[5]
X. Liu, Y. Yuan, J. Liu, B. Liu, X. Chen, J. Ding, X. Han, Y. Deng, C. Zhong, W. Hu, Nat. Commun., 2019, 10, 4767. DOI:10.1038/s41467-019-12627-2
[6]
S. Liu, Z. Wang, C. Yu, Z. Zhao, X. Fan, Z. Ling, J. Qiu, J. Mater. Chem. A, 2013, 1, 12033-12037. DOI:10.1039/c3ta13069j
[7]
T. V. Pham, H. P. Guo, W. B. Luo, S. L. Chou, J. Z. Wang, H. K. Liu, J. Mater. Chem. A, 2017, 5, 5283-5289. DOI:10.1039/C6TA10751F
[8]
W. B. Luo, X. W. Gao, D. Q. Shi, S. L. Chou, J. Z. Wang, H. K. Liu, Small, 2016, 12, 3031-3038. DOI:10.1002/smll.201600699
[9]
Z. Khan, S. Park, S. M. Hwang, J. Yang, Y. Lee, H. K. Song, Y. Kim, H. Ko, NPG Asia Mater., 2016, 8, e294. DOI:10.1038/am.2016.104
[10]
Q. Ren, H. Wang, X. F. Lu, Y. X. Tong, G. R. Li, Adv. Sci., 2018, 5, 1700515. DOI:10.1002/advs.201700515
[11]
H. Wang, Q. L. Zhu, R. Zou, Q. Xu, Chem, 2017, 2, 52-80. DOI:10.1016/j.chempr.2016.12.002
[12]
B. Zhu, D. Xia, R. Zou, Coord. Chem. Rev., 2018, 376, 430-448. DOI:10.1016/j.ccr.2018.07.020
[13]
J. Liu, D. Zhu, C. Guo, A. Vasileff, S. Z. Qiao, Adv. Energy Mater., 2017, 7, 1700518. DOI:10.1002/aenm.201700518
[14]
K. Shen, X. Chen, J. Chen, Y. Li, ACS Catal., 2016, 6, 5887-5903. DOI:10.1021/acscatal.6b01222
[15]
H. Furukawa, K. E. Cordova, M. O' Keeffe, O. M. Yaghi, Science, 2013, 341, 1230444. DOI:10.1126/science.1230444
[16]
B. Y. Xia, Y. Yan, N. Li, H. B. Wu, X. W. D. Lou, X. Wang, Nat. Energy, 2016, 1, 15006. DOI:10.1038/nenergy.2015.6
[17]
J. Duan, S. Chen, C. Zhao, Nat. Commun., 2017, 8, 15341. DOI:10.1038/ncomms15341
[18]
W. Cheng, X. Zhao, H. Su, F. Tang, W. Che, H. Zhang, Q. Liu, Nat. Energy, 2019, 4, 115-122. DOI:10.1038/s41560-018-0308-8
[19]
K. Huang, L. Zhang, T. Xu, H. Wei, R. Zhang, X. Zhang, B. Ge, M. Lei, J. Y. Ma, L. M. Liu, H. Wu, Nat. Commun., 2019, 10, 606. DOI:10.1038/s41467-019-08484-8
[20]
X. He, S. Z. Luan, L. Wang, R. Y. Wang, P. Du, Y. Y. Xu, H. J. Yang, Y. G. Wang, K. Huang, M. Lei, Mater. Lett., 2019, 244, 78-82. DOI:10.1016/j.matlet.2019.01.144
[21]
K. Huang, J. Liu, L. Wang, G. Chang, R. Wang, M. Lei, Y. Wang, Y. He, Appl. Surf. Sci., 2019, 487, 1145-1151. DOI:10.1016/j.apsusc.2019.05.183
[22]
K. S. Kim, Y. Zhao, H. Jang, S. Y. Lee, J. M. Kim, K. S. Kim, J. H. Ahn, P. Kim, J. Y. Choi, B. H. Hong, Nature, 2009, 457, 706-710. DOI:10.1038/nature07719
[23]
A. Reina, X. Jia, J. Ho, D. Nezich, H. Son, V. Bulovic, M. S. Dresselhaus, J. Kong, Nano Lett., 2008, 9, 30-35.
[24]
Z. Sun, Z. Yan, J. Yao, E. Beitler, Y. Zhu, J. M. Tour, Nature, 2010, 468, 549-552. DOI:10.1038/nature09579
[25]
M. Yu, S. Zhou, Z. Wang, J. Zhao, J. Qiu, Nano Energy, 2018, 44, 181-190. DOI:10.1016/j.nanoen.2017.12.003
[26]
C. Tang, N. Cheng, Z. Pu, W. Xing, X. Sun, Angew. Chem. Int. Ed., 2015, 54, 9351-9355. DOI:10.1002/anie.201503407
[27]
L. Fan, P. F. Liu, X. Yan, L. Gu, Z. Z. Yang, H. G. Yang, S. Qiu, X. Yao, Nat. Commun., 2016, 7, 10667. DOI:10.1038/ncomms10667
[28]
S. Zhao, Y. Wang, J. Dong, C. T. He, H. Yin, P. An, K. Zhao, X. Zhang, C. Gao, L. Zhang, J. Lv, J. Wang, J. Zhang, A. M. Khattak, N. A. Khan, Z. Wei, J. Zhang, S. Liu, H. Zhao, Z. Tang, Nat. Energy, 2016, 1, 16184. DOI:10.1038/nenergy.2016.184
[29]
C. Bai, A. Li, X. Yao, H. Liu, Y. Li, Green Chem, 2016, 18, 1061-1069. DOI:10.1039/C5GC02082D
[30]
P. Tan, B. Chen, H. Xu, W. Cai, W. He, M. Ni, Appl. Catal. B, 2019, 241, 104-112. DOI:10.1016/j.apcatb.2018.09.017
[31]
J. Ou, Y. Zhang, L. Chen, Q. Zhao, Y. Meng, Y. Guo, D. Xiao, J. Mater. Chem. A, 2015, 3, 6534-6541. DOI:10.1039/C4TA06614F
[32]
G. Zhang, C. Li, J. Liu, L. Zhou, R. Liu, X. Han, H. Huang, H. Hu, Y. Liu, Z. Kang, J. Mater. Chem. A, 2014, 2, 8184-8189. DOI:10.1039/c4ta00677a
[33]
M. Zhang, Q. Dai, H. Zheng, M. Chen, L. Dai, Adv. Mater., 2018, 30, 1705431. DOI:10.1002/adma.201705431
[34]
K. Huang, R. Wang, H. Wu, H. Wang, X. He, H. Wei, S. Wang, R. Zhang, M. Lei, W. Guo, B. Ge, H. Wu, J. Mater. Chem. A, 2019, 7, 25779-25784. DOI:10.1039/C9TA07469D
[35]
X. Yan, L. Tian, M. He, X. Chen, Nano Lett., 2015, 15, 6015-6021. DOI:10.1021/acs.nanolett.5b02205
[36]
H. Sun, Y. Lian, C. Yang, L. Xiong, P. Qi, Q. Mu, X. Zhao, J. Guo, Z. Deng, Y. Peng, Energy Environ. Sci., 2018, 11, 2363-2371. DOI:10.1039/C8EE00934A
[37]
H. Qiao, Y. Yang, X. Dai, H. Zhao, J. Yong, L. Yu, X. Luan, M. Cui, X. Zhang, X. Huang, Electrochim. Acta, 2019, 318, 430-439. DOI:10.1016/j.electacta.2019.06.084
[38]
V. K. Abdelkader-Fernández, D. M. Fernandes, S. S. Balula, L. Cunha-Silva, M. J. Pérez-Mendoza, F. J. López-Garzón, M. F. Pereira, C. Freire, ACS Appl. Energy Mater., 2019, 2, 1854-1867. DOI:10.1021/acsaem.8b02010