Chinese Journal of Catalysis

• Article • Previous Articles     Next Articles

Computational insights and strategic choices of nitrate and nitric oxide electroreduction to ammonia

Pu Guoa, Shaoxue Yangb,*, Huijuan Jinga, Dong Luana, Jun Longa,*, Jianping Xiaoa,c,*   

  1. aState Key Laboratory of Catalysis, Dalian Institute of Chemical Physics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Dalian 116023, Liaoning, China;
    bZhejiang Cancer Hospital, Hangzhou 310022, Zhejiang, China;
    cUniversity of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, China
  • Received:2025-05-14 Accepted:2025-06-25
  • Contact: * E-mail: yangsx@zjcc.org.cn (S. Yang), longjun@dicp.ac.cn (J. Long), xiao@dicp.ac.cn (J. Xiao).
  • Supported by:
    National Key Research and Development Program of China (2023YFA1509103), the National Natural Science Foundation of China (22425207, 22172156, 22402186), the Energy Revolution S&T Program of Yulin Innovation Institute of Clean Energy (YIICE E411050316), the State Key Laboratory of Catalysis (2024SKL-A-016), the DICP (DICP I202314, DICP I202425), and China Postdoctoral Science Foundation (GZC20232584, 2024M763199).

Abstract: Electrochemical nitrate reduction (eNO3RR) and nitric oxide reduction (eNORR) to ammonia have emerged as promising and sustainable alternatives to the traditional Haber-Bosch method for ammonia production, particularly within the recently proposed reverse artificial nitrogen cycle route: N2 → NOx → NH3. Notably, experimental studies have demonstrated that eNORR exhibits superior performance over eNO3RR on Cu6Sn5 catalysts. However, the fundamental mechanisms underlying this difference remain poorly understood. Herein, we performed systematic theoretical calculations to explore the reaction pathways, electronic structure effects, and potential-dependent Faradic efficiency associated with ammonia production via these two distinct electrochemical pathways (eNORR and eNO3RR) on Cu6Sn5. By implementing an advanced ‘adaptive electric field controlled constant potential (EFC-CP)’ methodology combined with microkinetic modeling, we successfully reproduced the experimental observations and identified the key factors affecting ammonia production in both reaction pathways. It was found that eNORR outperforms eNO3RR because it circumvents the *NO2 dissociation and *NO2 desorption steps, leading to distinct surface coverage of key intermediates between the two pathways. Furthermore, the reaction rates were found to exhibit a pronounced dependence on the surface coverage of *NO in eNORR and *NO2 in eNO3RR. Specifically, the facile desorption of *NO2 on the Cu6Sn5 surface in eNO3RR limits the attainable surface coverage of *NO, thereby impeding its performance. In contrast, the eNORR can maintain a high surface coverage of adsorbed *NO species, contributing to its enhanced ammonia production performance. These fundamental insights provide valuable guidance for the rational design of catalysts and the optimization of reaction routes, facilitating the development of more efficient, sustainable, and scalable techniques for ammonia production.

Key words: Reverse ammonia production, Electrocatalysis, Nitric oxide reduction, Nitrate reduction, Constant potential, Density functional theory calculation, Microkinetic modeling