Chinese Journal of Catalysis ›› 2026, Vol. 81: 124-135.DOI: 10.1016/S1872-2067(25)64903-5
• Article • Previous Articles Next Articles
Xinyi Wanga,d,1, Chaoqi Wangb,1, Miao Yanga(
), Xiaoguang Wangb(
), Yuezhong Zuob, Zhuangzhuang Zhangb, Yimo Wua,e, Jingfeng Hana, Bing Lia, Wei Huangc, Limin Renc, Yingxu Weia, Xinmei Liud, Peng Tiana, Zhongmin Liua,e(
)
Received:2025-08-15
Accepted:2025-09-22
Online:2026-02-18
Published:2025-12-26
Contact:
*E-mail: yangmiao@dicp.ac.cn (M. Yang),wangxg@dlut.edu.cn (X. Wang),liuzm@dicp.ac.cn (Z. Liu).
About author:1 These authors contributed equally to this work.
Supported by:Xinyi Wang, Chaoqi Wang, Miao Yang, Xiaoguang Wang, Yuezhong Zuo, Zhuangzhuang Zhang, Yimo Wu, Jingfeng Han, Bing Li, Wei Huang, Limin Ren, Yingxu Wei, Xinmei Liu, Peng Tian, Zhongmin Liu. Machine-learning-aided discovery of methanol-to-olefins zeolite catalysts with ultra-high initial selectivity[J]. Chinese Journal of Catalysis, 2026, 81: 124-135.
Add to citation manager EndNote|Ris|BibTeX
URL: https://www.cjcatal.com/EN/10.1016/S1872-2067(25)64903-5
Fig. 1. Schematic for curating the datasets: extracting structural parameters of zeolites from the IZA database, searching for MTO catalytic results of different zeolites from published papers, downloading the papers, and mining text, tables and graphs for reaction conditions and catalytic results.
| Variables | Name of variables/units | Range/counts | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Input variables | catalyst property | Mod. | 0/5463 | |
| 1/1273 | ||||
| AS | 0 (SAPO)/1959 | |||
| 1 (zeolite)/4777 | ||||
| A/T | 0-1 | |||
| FDSi/T/1000Å [ | 12.80-19.70 | |||
| LRS | 8-MR/4159 | |||
| 10-MR/1843 | ||||
| 12-MR/712 | ||||
| 18-MR/22 | ||||
| MDa/Å | 1.27-7.35 | |||
| MDb/Å | 1.49-7.35 | |||
| MDc/Å | 1.53-11.20 | |||
| MDi/Å | 5.25-11.74 | |||
| CD | 1D/436 | |||
| 2D/1421 | ||||
| 3D/4879 | ||||
| CS/µm | 0.02-5.00 | |||
| reaction conditions | RT/°C | 270-700 | ||
| WHSV/h‒1 | 0.35-48.00 | |||
| TOS/min | 0-30156.92 | |||
| Output variables | methanol conversion/% | 0.00-100.00 | ||
| Sethene/% | 0.00-68.61 | |||
| Spropene/% | 0.00-68.90 | |||
| SC2=+C3=/% | 0.00-92.21 | |||
| P/E | 0.00-37.37 | |||
Table 1 The type, name and range of the variables in the MTO database.
| Variables | Name of variables/units | Range/counts | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Input variables | catalyst property | Mod. | 0/5463 | |
| 1/1273 | ||||
| AS | 0 (SAPO)/1959 | |||
| 1 (zeolite)/4777 | ||||
| A/T | 0-1 | |||
| FDSi/T/1000Å [ | 12.80-19.70 | |||
| LRS | 8-MR/4159 | |||
| 10-MR/1843 | ||||
| 12-MR/712 | ||||
| 18-MR/22 | ||||
| MDa/Å | 1.27-7.35 | |||
| MDb/Å | 1.49-7.35 | |||
| MDc/Å | 1.53-11.20 | |||
| MDi/Å | 5.25-11.74 | |||
| CD | 1D/436 | |||
| 2D/1421 | ||||
| 3D/4879 | ||||
| CS/µm | 0.02-5.00 | |||
| reaction conditions | RT/°C | 270-700 | ||
| WHSV/h‒1 | 0.35-48.00 | |||
| TOS/min | 0-30156.92 | |||
| Output variables | methanol conversion/% | 0.00-100.00 | ||
| Sethene/% | 0.00-68.61 | |||
| Spropene/% | 0.00-68.90 | |||
| SC2=+C3=/% | 0.00-92.21 | |||
| P/E | 0.00-37.37 | |||
Fig. 2. (a) Illustration of some inputs including AS (acid strength): 0 for SAPO and 1 for aluminosilicate; A/T (acid density): Si/T for SAPO and Al/T for aluminosilicate (T refers to the sum of framework atoms [T atoms]); Mod.: 1 for modified and 0 for unmodified. (b) The correlation heatmap of all inputs in the MTO dataset.
Fig. 3. Summary of the AUC for each ML algorithm for classification of methanol conversion. The inset is the performance of classification on the whole dataset given by the stacking classifier.
Fig. 4. Feature importance heuristic given by the DT classifier for methanol conversion and visual structure of the DT. Some of the typical leave notes mentioned have been highlighted with bule solid (with more “low” points) and red dotted line (with more “high” points) circles.
Fig. 5. The performance of 23 ML methods for SC2=+C3= (a) and P/E (b) respectively. Four metrics, MAE, RMSE, R2, and RMSLE were used to evaluate these methods. The ML methods before the gray line are better. The training and test sets of SC2=+C3= (c) and P/E (d) by Stacking Regressor.
Fig. 6. (a) The visual structure of the DT. The numbers below the points are the average values of SC2=+C3=. (b) The feature importance heuristic given by the DT Regressor for SC2=+C3=. (c) SHAP analysis for SC2=+C3=. A color gradient, ranging from blue solid line (low feature values) to pink/red dotted line (high feature values), helps visualize the correlation between feature values and their SHAP values.
| Topology | SAPOs | A/T | Zeolites | A/T | CD |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AEI | SAPO-18 [ | 0‒0.1 | SSZ-39 [ | 0.1 | 3 |
| AWW | AlPO-22 [ AlPO-CJB1 [ | 0 | none | — | 1 |
| AFT | AlPO-52 [ | 0 | SSZ-112 [ | ~0.13 | 3 |
| AFX | SAPO-56 [ | 0.15‒0.2 | SSZ-16 [ | 0.14 | 3 |
| CHA | SAPO-34 [ | 0.05‒0.2 | SSZ-13 [ | 0.02‒0.2, 0 | 3 |
| DDR | none | — | ZSM-58 [ | 0.01‒0.02, 0 | 2 |
| SFW | none | — | SSZ-52 [ | 0.11 | 3 |
Table 2 Lists of the information on materials belonging to the seven topologies.
| Topology | SAPOs | A/T | Zeolites | A/T | CD |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AEI | SAPO-18 [ | 0‒0.1 | SSZ-39 [ | 0.1 | 3 |
| AWW | AlPO-22 [ AlPO-CJB1 [ | 0 | none | — | 1 |
| AFT | AlPO-52 [ | 0 | SSZ-112 [ | ~0.13 | 3 |
| AFX | SAPO-56 [ | 0.15‒0.2 | SSZ-16 [ | 0.14 | 3 |
| CHA | SAPO-34 [ | 0.05‒0.2 | SSZ-13 [ | 0.02‒0.2, 0 | 3 |
| DDR | none | — | ZSM-58 [ | 0.01‒0.02, 0 | 2 |
| SFW | none | — | SSZ-52 [ | 0.11 | 3 |
Fig. 7. (a) MTO catalytic performance of SSZ-13s with different Si/Al ratios at 450 °C, WHSV of 1.0 h−1. (b) The experimental (solid symbols) and predicted (hollow symbols) MTO catalytic performance of STT-100 at 450 °C and WHSV of 1.0 h−1. The predicted lifetime is labeled by the gray dotted line.
|
| [1] | Xin Song, Zhonghua Li, Li Sheng, Yang Liu. Spin density symmetry breaking-mediated hydrogen evolution in single-atom catalysts [J]. Chinese Journal of Catalysis, 2026, 80(1): 213-226. |
| [2] | Mansurbek Urol ugli Abdullaev, Woosong Jeon, Yun Kang, Juhwan Noh, Jung Ho Shin, Hee-Joon Chun, Hyun Woo Kim, Yong Tae Kim. Data-driven framework based on machine learning and optimization algorithms to predict oxide-zeolite-based composite and reaction conditions for syngas-to-olefin conversion [J]. Chinese Journal of Catalysis, 2025, 74(7): 211-227. |
| [3] | Qianli Ma, Hong Nie, Ping Yang, Jianqiang Liu, Hongyi Gao, Wei Wang, Songtao Dong. Insights into Structure-Activity Relationships between Y Zeolites and their n-C10 Hydrocracking Performances via Machine Learning Approaches [J]. Chinese Journal of Catalysis, 2025, 71(4): 187-196. |
| [4] | Zihao Jiao, Chengyi Zhang, Ya Liu, Liejin Guo, Ziyun Wang. Graph neural network-driven prediction of high-performance CO2 reduction catalysts based on Cu-based high-entropy alloys [J]. Chinese Journal of Catalysis, 2025, 71(4): 197-207. |
| [5] | Tao Ban, Jian-Wei Wang, Xi-Yang Yu, Hai-Kuo Tian, Xin Gao, Zheng-Qing Huang, Chun-Ran Chang. Machine learning-assisted screening of SA-FLP dual-active-site catalysts for the production of methanol from methane and water [J]. Chinese Journal of Catalysis, 2025, 70(3): 311-321. |
| [6] | Borong Lu, Chunmei Lv, Ying Xie, Kai Zhu, Ke Ye, Xiaojin Li. Construction of Ni2P/CoP interface for highly efficient electrolysis of urea-assisted hydrogen production at industrial current densities [J]. Chinese Journal of Catalysis, 2025, 69(2): 163-175. |
| [7] | Nan Mu, Tingting Bo, Yugao Hu, Ruixin Xu, Yanyu Liu, Wei Zhou. Single-atom catalysts based on polarization switching of ferroelectric In2Se3 for N2 reduction [J]. Chinese Journal of Catalysis, 2024, 63(8): 244-257. |
| [8] | Jieyu Liu, Haiqiang Guo, Yulin Xiong, Xing Chen, Yifu Yu, Changhong Wang. Rational design of Pt-anchored single-atom alloy electrocatalysts for NO-to-NH3 conversion by density functional theory and machine learning [J]. Chinese Journal of Catalysis, 2024, 62(7): 243-253. |
| [9] | Yan Duan, Mifeng Xue, Bin Liu, Man Zhang, Yuchen Wang, Baojun Wang, Riguang Zhang, Kai Yan. Integration of theory prediction and experimental electrooxidation of glycerol on NiCo2O4 nanosheets [J]. Chinese Journal of Catalysis, 2024, 57(2): 68-79. |
| [10] | Kai Fan, Qinming Wu, Shuo Liu, Haiyu Kong, Sen Wang, Eduard Kunkes, Trees De Baerdemaeker, Andrei-Nicolae Parvulescu, Nils Bottke, Toshiyuki Yokoi, Dirk E. De Vos, Xiangju Meng, Weiping Zhang, Feng-Shou Xiao. Adjusting Al location in the framework of ITH zeolites for catalytic conversion of methanol to olefins [J]. Chinese Journal of Catalysis, 2024, 56(1): 114-121. |
| [11] | Yuzhuo Chen, Hao Wang, Bing Lu, Ni Yi, Liang Cao, Yong Wang, Shanjun Mao. Fine-structure sensitive deep learning framework for predicting catalytic properties with high precision [J]. Chinese Journal of Catalysis, 2023, 50(7): 284-296. |
| [12] | Shuaiqi Meng, Zhongyu Li, Peng Zhang, Francisca Contreras, Yu Ji, Ulrich Schwaneberg. Deep learning guided enzyme engineering of Thermobifida fusca cutinase for increased PET depolymerization [J]. Chinese Journal of Catalysis, 2023, 50(7): 229-238. |
| [13] | Runze Liu, Xue Shao, Chang Wang, Weili Dai, Naijia Guan. Reaction mechanism of methanol-to-hydrocarbons conversion: Fundamental and application [J]. Chinese Journal of Catalysis, 2023, 47(4): 67-92. |
| [14] | Lijing Wang, Tianyi Yang, Bo Feng, Xiangyu Xu, Yuying Shen, Zihan Li, Arramel , Jizhou Jiang. Constructing dual electron transfer channels to accelerate CO2 photoreduction guided by machine learning and first-principles calculation [J]. Chinese Journal of Catalysis, 2023, 54(11): 265-277. |
| [15] | Xiao-Tian Li, Lin Chen, Cheng Shang, Zhi-Pan Liu. Selectivity control in alkyne semihydrogenation: Recent experimental and theoretical progress [J]. Chinese Journal of Catalysis, 2022, 43(8): 1991-2000. |
| Viewed | ||||||
|
Full text |
|
|||||
|
Abstract |
|
|||||