Chinese Journal of Catalysis ›› 2026, Vol. 85: 1-12.DOI: 10.1016/S1872-2067(26)65036-X
• Perspective • Next Articles
Fleur A. E. Bruekers, Tess I. van Benthem, Rajamohanan Sobhana Anju(
), N. Raveendran Shiju(
)
Received:2025-09-22
Accepted:2025-12-12
Online:2026-06-18
Published:2026-05-18
Contact:
*E-mail: a.rajamohanansobhana@uva.nl (R. S. Anju),About author:Dr. Anju Rajamohanan Sobhana (University of Amsterdam), was a Marie Skłodowska-Curie Postdoctoral Fellow at the University of Amsterdam, The Netherlands (2024-2025). Dr. Anju serves as Assistant Professor at NSS College, Ottapalam, India since 2018. She received her Ph.D. degree from the Indian Institute of Technology (IIT) Madras (India) in 2015. She carried out postdoctoral research at Gulf University for Science and Technology (Kuwait), Texas A&M University at Qatar, and Qatar Energy Environment and Research Institute (Qatar). Her research interests mainly focus on organometallic chemistry, boron cluster chemistry, catalysis and CO2 valorisation. She has published 23 peer-reviewed research articles in leading international journals.1Contributed equally to this work.
Fleur A. E. Bruekers, Tess I. van Benthem, Rajamohanan Sobhana Anju, N. Raveendran Shiju. Phase to performance: The advancing role of molybdenum carbides in reverse water-gas shift reaction[J]. Chinese Journal of Catalysis, 2026, 85: 1-12.
Add to citation manager EndNote|Ris|BibTeX
URL: https://www.cjcatal.com/EN/10.1016/S1872-2067(26)65036-X
| Catalyst (year of publication) | Phase (structure) | Space velocity (mL gcat-1 h-1) | CO rate (mmol gcat-1 h-1) | Temperature (°C) | Ref. |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2D-Mo2C (2021) | (hexagonal) | 120000 | 142.3 | 430 | [ |
| β-Mo2C (2017) | β-Mo2C (HCP) | 300000 | 720.0 | 600 | [ |
| Nanowired β-Mo2C (2016) | β-Mo2C (HCP) | 36000 | 61.7 | 600 | [ |
| Nanowired α-MoC1-x (2016) | cubic α-MoC1-x (FCC) | 36000 | 61.7 | 600 | [ |
| cubic α-Mo2C (2024) | α-Mo2C (FCC) | 100000 | 395.0 | 600 | [ |
| α-Mo2C (2017) | hexagonal α-Mo2C (hexagonal) | 3000 | 1.7 | 400 | [ |
| Co/β-Mo2C (7.5 wt%) (2014) | β-Mo2C (HCP) | 300000 | 49.8 | 300 | [ |
| Cu/β-Mo2C (1.3 wt%) (2017) | β-Mo2C (HCP) | 300000 | 1703.0 | 600 | [ |
| Cs-Mo2C (2019) | β-Mo2C (HCP) | 12000 | 24.6 | 600 | [ |
| 1K-Cu/Mo2C (2021) | β-Mo2C | 84000 | 176.0 | 600 | [ |
| K-Mo2C@γ-Al2O3 (1:4:15) (20 wt%) (2022) | β-Mo2C | 3600 | 71.2 | 300 | [ |
| MoxC/SiO2 (2022) | β-Mo2C (HCP) & MoC (FCC) | 20000 | 17.0 | 400 | [ |
| MoxC/Al2O3 (2022) | — | 20000 | 14.8 | 400 | [ |
| MoC (2024) | hexagonal β-Mo2C → hexagonal MoC | 2840000 | 7544.6 | 600 | [ |
| α-MoC (2025) | α-MoC (FCC) | 1800000 | 926,6 | 300 | [ |
| 3D printed Mo2C (10 wt% Mo) (2024) | δ-cubic MoC : η-Mo3C2 | 1187 | 17.6 | 600 | [ |
| Mon-Mo2C cluster (1.3 wt% Mo) (2024) | β-Mo2C | 30000 | 2,071 | 400 | [ |
| Ir-MoO3 (0.5 wt% Ir) (2024) | cubic α-MoC (FCC) | 2000000 | 17500 | 600 | [ |
Table 1 Summary of the molybdenum carbide catalysts including their crystal structure, catalytic performance (CO rate), and operational conditions (space velocity, temperature). All catalysts were reported at a pressure of 1 bar, except K-Mo2C@γ-Al2O3 reported at 20 bar.
| Catalyst (year of publication) | Phase (structure) | Space velocity (mL gcat-1 h-1) | CO rate (mmol gcat-1 h-1) | Temperature (°C) | Ref. |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2D-Mo2C (2021) | (hexagonal) | 120000 | 142.3 | 430 | [ |
| β-Mo2C (2017) | β-Mo2C (HCP) | 300000 | 720.0 | 600 | [ |
| Nanowired β-Mo2C (2016) | β-Mo2C (HCP) | 36000 | 61.7 | 600 | [ |
| Nanowired α-MoC1-x (2016) | cubic α-MoC1-x (FCC) | 36000 | 61.7 | 600 | [ |
| cubic α-Mo2C (2024) | α-Mo2C (FCC) | 100000 | 395.0 | 600 | [ |
| α-Mo2C (2017) | hexagonal α-Mo2C (hexagonal) | 3000 | 1.7 | 400 | [ |
| Co/β-Mo2C (7.5 wt%) (2014) | β-Mo2C (HCP) | 300000 | 49.8 | 300 | [ |
| Cu/β-Mo2C (1.3 wt%) (2017) | β-Mo2C (HCP) | 300000 | 1703.0 | 600 | [ |
| Cs-Mo2C (2019) | β-Mo2C (HCP) | 12000 | 24.6 | 600 | [ |
| 1K-Cu/Mo2C (2021) | β-Mo2C | 84000 | 176.0 | 600 | [ |
| K-Mo2C@γ-Al2O3 (1:4:15) (20 wt%) (2022) | β-Mo2C | 3600 | 71.2 | 300 | [ |
| MoxC/SiO2 (2022) | β-Mo2C (HCP) & MoC (FCC) | 20000 | 17.0 | 400 | [ |
| MoxC/Al2O3 (2022) | — | 20000 | 14.8 | 400 | [ |
| MoC (2024) | hexagonal β-Mo2C → hexagonal MoC | 2840000 | 7544.6 | 600 | [ |
| α-MoC (2025) | α-MoC (FCC) | 1800000 | 926,6 | 300 | [ |
| 3D printed Mo2C (10 wt% Mo) (2024) | δ-cubic MoC : η-Mo3C2 | 1187 | 17.6 | 600 | [ |
| Mon-Mo2C cluster (1.3 wt% Mo) (2024) | β-Mo2C | 30000 | 2,071 | 400 | [ |
| Ir-MoO3 (0.5 wt% Ir) (2024) | cubic α-MoC (FCC) | 2000000 | 17500 | 600 | [ |
Fig. 1. Crystal structures of HCP (A) and FCC (B) like catalysts (Mo: cyan; C: grey). Reprinted with permission from Ref. [17]. Copyright 2016, Elsevier Ltd. (C) Schematic depiction of cubic α-Mo2C (Mo: purple; C: grey). Reprinted with permission from Ref. [13], Copyright © 2024 The Author(s). (D) Schematic depiction of 2D-Mo2C (Mo: blue; C: grey). Reprinted with permission from Ref. [18]. Copyright 2021, The Author(s).
Fig. 2. (A) Carbidic-carbon-participation during the RWGS reaction over α-MoC catalysts. Reprinted with permission from Ref. 39. Copyright 2024, American Chemical Society should read as Reprinted with permission from Ref 35, Copyright © 2024 American Chemical Society. (B) HRETM images of MoC showing the structural evolution with carbon flow during RWGS reaction (top) and superimposition of successive images form the in situ HRTEM sequence (red for high temperature image, green for low temperature image and yellow is the overlap of red and green, bottom) Reprinted with permission from Ref. [11]. Copyright 2024, Wiley-VCH GmbH. (C) Schematic diagram of the positive feedback between catalytic activity and structural evolution of β-Mo2N under RWGS reaction. Reprinted with permission from Ref. [37]. Copyright 2024, The Author(s). (D) In-situ carburization of MoOx leading to the formation of β-Mo2C followed by hexagonal MoC. Reprinted with permission from Ref. [5]. Copyright 2024, Wiley-VCH GmbH. (E) Structural diversity of co-generated Mo species boosting RWGS activity. Reprinted with permission from Ref. [39]. Copyright 2024, American Chemical Society.
| Catalyst | Dominant RWGS pathway | Remarks |
|---|---|---|
| β-Mo2C (bulk/nanocrystalline) [ | dissociative | Mo-terminated Mo2C surfaces favor CO2 dissociation. |
| α-Mo2C (bulk/nanocrystalline) [ | H2-assisted redox mechanism | phase purity, weak CO binding, and interstitial O underpin performance |
| α-MoC (FCC) [ | carbon cycle | dynamic carbon flux; Bulk-surface-gas exchange of carbon; lattice carbon participation than pure surface dissociation. |
| α-MoC with MoOxCy [ | carbon cycle (Vacancy mediated) | distinct from classic redox/associative mechanism; CO2-derived C inserts into Mo-Mo vacancies on MoOxCy, forms CO, and the vacancy regenerates by abstracting carbidic C. |
| In-situ carburized HxMoOy→MoC [ | activation-driven | CO induced in situ carburization under RWGS; very high CO productivity rate |
| α-MoC1-x [ | associative | formate decomposition mechanism. |
Table 2 RWGS pathways over representative Mo-C catalysts.
| Catalyst | Dominant RWGS pathway | Remarks |
|---|---|---|
| β-Mo2C (bulk/nanocrystalline) [ | dissociative | Mo-terminated Mo2C surfaces favor CO2 dissociation. |
| α-Mo2C (bulk/nanocrystalline) [ | H2-assisted redox mechanism | phase purity, weak CO binding, and interstitial O underpin performance |
| α-MoC (FCC) [ | carbon cycle | dynamic carbon flux; Bulk-surface-gas exchange of carbon; lattice carbon participation than pure surface dissociation. |
| α-MoC with MoOxCy [ | carbon cycle (Vacancy mediated) | distinct from classic redox/associative mechanism; CO2-derived C inserts into Mo-Mo vacancies on MoOxCy, forms CO, and the vacancy regenerates by abstracting carbidic C. |
| In-situ carburized HxMoOy→MoC [ | activation-driven | CO induced in situ carburization under RWGS; very high CO productivity rate |
| α-MoC1-x [ | associative | formate decomposition mechanism. |
Fig. 3. (A) Comparison of CO productivity among molybdenum carbides (star symbol, 1-19) and other catalysts reported in literature (circle symbol, 20-36). (B) Comparison of CO selectivity (above the dashed line) of the different catalysts and the CO2 conversion (below the dashed line) over time on stream. Table S1 shows the performance metrics of the catalysts shown in Fig. 3 [8,10,11,13,15,16,18,19,32-35,43], along with additional state-of-the-art RWGS catalysts [16,44-58].
|
| [1] | Wei Zhong, Yiyao Gan, Jingtao Wang, Peiyi Yang, Aiyun Meng, Yaorong Su. Achieving near-equilibrium Had adsorption/desorption by introducing asymmetric S-Re-Se modules in a-ReSxSe2-x cocatalysts for enhanced photocatalytic H2 evolution [J]. Chinese Journal of Catalysis, 2026, 85(6): 322-332. |
| [2] | Yuxi Ren, Baorong Xu, Yu Jin, Hang Xiao, Ranran Niu, Wei Liu, Honghui Ou, Guidong Yang. Homojunction-driven d-band engineering in NiMoO4 for selective electrochemical nitrogen reduction to ammonia [J]. Chinese Journal of Catalysis, 2026, 85(6): 216-225. |
| [3] | Polina Lavrik, Jurjen Cazemier, Mohamed N. Hedhili, Sudheesh K. Veeranmaril, Abdallah Nassereddine, Antonio Aguilar-Tapia, Marina Chernova, Jean-Louis Hazemann, Alla Dikhtiarenko, Javier Ruiz-Martínez. Relationship between palladium nuclearity and catalytic activity and selectivity in acetylene semi-hydrogenation [J]. Chinese Journal of Catalysis, 2026, 85(6): 384-393. |
| [4] | Jia Ruan, Wenjing Chen, Ziqian Li, Peng Hu, Cheng-Yong Su. Intermolecular asymmetric dearomative photocycloaddition of (benzo)furans with excited alkenes via cage-confined catalysis [J]. Chinese Journal of Catalysis, 2026, 85(6): 346-355. |
| [5] | Jing-Yu Li, Yi-Jun Xu. Regioselective ring-opening of epoxides triggered by light [J]. Chinese Journal of Catalysis, 2026, 85(6): 34-46. |
| [6] | Lanlan Chen, Li Sheng, Yanan Zhou, Qiquan Luo, Zhenyu Li, Wenhua Zhang, Jinlong Yang. Unraveling the superiority of Ni1-MoS2 single-atom catalyst in CO2 hydrogenation to methanol: A DFT combined microkinetic study [J]. Chinese Journal of Catalysis, 2026, 85(6): 143-152. |
| [7] | Ksenia A. Kokina, Anton S. Konopatsky, Ekaterina S. Chikanova, Danil V. Barilyuk, Tatyana O. Teplakova, Denis V. Leybo, Ekaterina V. Sukhanova, Zakhar I. Popov, Alexey Y. Antonov, Olga A. Boeva, Sergey A. Efimov, Dmitry V. Shtansky. Does high-entropy oxide (CrMnFeCoNi)3O4 catalyst require support to improve performance in CO2 hydrogenation? [J]. Chinese Journal of Catalysis, 2026, 85(6): 168-181. |
| [8] | Syeda Sidra Bibi, Sheraz Ahmed, Heuntae Jo, Jaehoon Kim. Turning methanation into chain growth: Na-induced mechanistic bifurcation on Co-ZrOx catalyst [J]. Chinese Journal of Catalysis, 2026, 85(6): 394-411. |
| [9] | Jintao Dong, Rui Zhang, Zhishuai Wang, Shengqun Cao, Lina Li, Gaopeng Liu, Bin Wang, Yixuan Gao, Jiexiang Xia. Construction of S-scheme MnO2/BiOCl heterojunction boosting photocatalytic low-concentration peroxymonosulfate activation for contaminants removal [J]. Chinese Journal of Catalysis, 2026, 85(6): 310-321. |
| [10] | Jinhai Yu, Yingdi Hao, Yingzhi Ren, Beibei Zhao, Ge Ma, Zihao Guo, Yan Zhang, Xiaoqiang Huang. Radical hydroazidation of alkene enabled by synergistic photobiocatalysis combining ene-reductase with an organophotocatalyst [J]. Chinese Journal of Catalysis, 2026, 85(6): 88-95. |
| [11] | Alexey S. Galushko, Ilya V. Chepkasov, Ruslan R. Shaydullin, Daniil A. Boiko, Alexander G. Kvashnin, Artem M. Abakumov, Valentine P. Ananikov. Reactive gas modulation alters metal nanostructures nuclearity and boosts catalytic activity [J]. Chinese Journal of Catalysis, 2026, 84(5): 324-336. |
| [12] | Shican Jiang, Mingyu Yi, Zuozheng Liu, Abhishek Dutta Chowdhury. Linking catalyst synthesis strategies to CO2-modified Fischer-Tropsch performance in iron-carbon systems [J]. Chinese Journal of Catalysis, 2026, 84(5): 236-249. |
| [13] | Mingtao Chu, Huimin Zhang, Bianqing Ren, Jing Cao, Teng Zhang, Ping Song, Zizhun Wang, Ce Han, Weilin Xu. Amorphous-crystalline heterostructured RuMoNiN/Ni-MoO2 for highly efficient and stable alkaline hydrogen evolution reaction [J]. Chinese Journal of Catalysis, 2026, 84(5): 96-105. |
| [14] | Jingyao Wu, Yujing Lv, Qiang Zhao, Shuo Wang, Ying Wang, Na Wen, Zhengxin Ding, Zizhong Zhang, Jinlin Long. Electron-proton duet in covalent organic frameworks for efficient direct oxygen reduction to hydrogen peroxide [J]. Chinese Journal of Catalysis, 2026, 84(5): 288-300. |
| [15] | Zhiyao Liu, Tangkang Liu, Chuan Qin, Guoliang Liu, Anmin Zheng. Zirconia-mediated interfacial catalysis for CO2 hydrogenation [J]. Chinese Journal of Catalysis, 2026, 84(5): 1-24. |
| Viewed | ||||||
|
Full text |
|
|||||
|
Abstract |
|
|||||