催化学报 ›› 2022, Vol. 43 ›› Issue (12): 3062-3088.DOI: 10.1016/S1872-2067(22)64132-9
张博a, 吴运祯a, 翟潘龙a, 王晨a, 孙立成b,c, 侯军刚a,*()
收稿日期:
2022-04-05
接受日期:
2022-05-13
出版日期:
2022-12-18
发布日期:
2022-10-18
通讯作者:
侯军刚
基金资助:
Bo Zhanga, Yunzhen Wua, Panlong Zhaia, Chen Wanga, Licheng Sunb,c, Jungang Houa,*()
Received:
2022-04-05
Accepted:
2022-05-13
Online:
2022-12-18
Published:
2022-10-18
Contact:
Jungang Hou
About author:
Prof. Jungang Hou is currently a full professor in Dalian University of Technology. He received his PhD degree from Tianjin University. He joined the faculty of University of Science and Technology Beijing and was promoted to associate professor in 2013. He worked in Tohoku University as a fellow of Japan Society for the Promotion of Science from 2014 to 2015. Since 2015, he became a full professor in Dalian University of Technology (DUT). His research interests focus on the development of photocatalysts and electrocatalysts, photocatalytic and electrocatalytic water splitting, CO2/N2 conversion to valuable chemicals and synthesis and applications of nanostructured materials.
Supported by:
摘要:
近年来, 化石能源的过度消耗导致大量的碳排放, 由此引发了温室效应等环境问题, 给人类社会的生存和发展带来巨大挑战. 当前, 通过不同的技术手段(生物催化、有机催化、光催化、电催化以及光电催化)已经能够实现二氧化碳的转化, 从而为减少温室气体排放奠定了良好技术基础. 其中, 电催化二氧化碳还原技术具有生产装置简单、反应条件温和等优点, 是实现碳中和的一种理想途径. 电催化二氧化碳还原技术的核心在于制备出具有高活性、高选择性以及高稳定性的催化剂. 铋基催化剂展现出了极佳的电催化二氧化碳还原性能, 能够在大电流密度下实现甲酸的制备, 同时具有极好的选择性和稳定性, 因此, 成为电催化二氧化碳还原领域的研究热点.
本文综述了铋基材料在电催化二氧化碳还原领域的最新研究进展. 首先介绍了铋基催化剂的种类(单原子、单质、合金、化合物、复合物)、制备方法(模板法、电沉积法、剥离法、湿化学法、MOF衍生法)以及调控策略(形貌工程、缺陷工程、组分调控工程、异质结工程), 讨论了不同合成方法的优缺点和不同改性策略的差异, 旨在阐明如何构建具有高活性、高选择性和高稳定性的铋基催化剂. 同时, 在催化剂的合成、优化与催化剂活性之间架起桥梁, 即通过有效的合成方法和改性策略对催化剂形貌结构和电子结构进行调控, 从而提高材料整体的电催化性能. 为了更加深入地研究反应机理, 对常用的原位表征技术(原位拉曼光谱、原位红外光谱、原位同步辐射光谱)进行了深入讨论. 借助于原位表征技术, 不但能够直接捕捉到催化剂表面和反应中间体之间的相互作用, 还能够对反应过程中的催化剂表面价态和结构进行分析, 对研究反应路径具有重要意义. 此外, 对电催化二氧化碳还原的工业化应用前景进行了探讨. 最后, 对电催化二氧化碳还原领域未来所面临的挑战与机遇进行了展望.
张博, 吴运祯, 翟潘龙, 王晨, 孙立成, 侯军刚. 铋基催化剂的合理设计和电催化二氧化碳转化[J]. 催化学报, 2022, 43(12): 3062-3088.
Bo Zhang, Yunzhen Wu, Panlong Zhai, Chen Wang, Licheng Sun, Jungang Hou. Rational design of bismuth-based catalysts for electrochemical CO2 reduction[J]. Chinese Journal of Catalysis, 2022, 43(12): 3062-3088.
Fig. 5. (a) The proposed formation mechanisms of Bi-SAs-NS/C catalyst. Reprinted with permission from Ref. [65]. Copyright 2021, Springer Nature. (b,c) Magnified HAADF-STEM images, (d) Energy dispersive X-ray spectroscopy (EDS) elemental mapping of Bi SACs/NC. Reprinted with permission from Ref. [66]. Copyright 2019, American Chemical Society. (e,f) Magnified HAADF-STEM images of Bi SAs/NC; (g) The corresponding intensity profiles along the line X-Y in (c). Reprinted with permission from Ref. [67]. Copyright 2020, Royal Society of Chemistry.
Fig. 6. (a) Schematic illustration of Bi nanoparticles with grain boundary. Reprinted with permission from Ref. [86]. Copyright 2020, Springer Nature. (b) STEM-EDS elemental mapping of bismuth nitrate nanosheet. (c) TEM of nanosheet. (d,e) TEM and high-resolution TEM images of in situ reduced metallic 2D-Bi nanosheets. Reprinted with permission from Ref. [87]. Copyright 2019, Springer Nature. (f-h) SEM and STEM-HAADF images of Bi2O3 nanotube. Reprinted with permission from Ref. [75]. Copyright 2019, Springer Nature.
Fig. 7. (a) The flow chart of the experimental procedures. (b,c) Bi-Sn nano-alloys for photocatalytic dye degradation and electrochemical CO2 reduction. (d) Bi-Sn binary alloy phase diagram. Reprinted with permission from Ref. [99]. Copyright 2019, Springer Nature. (e,f) Calculated reaction energy profiles for CO2RR to form CO (top) and HCOOH (bottom) on Sn (101) surface and Bi-Sn (101) surface. Reprinted with permission from Ref. [96]. Copyright 2018, Wiely-VCH.
Fig. 8. (a) Schematic of the preparation process. (b) Cross-sectional SEM image. (c-e) Top-view images at different magnifications for the Bi2O3 fractal films. Reprinted with permission from Ref. [112]. Copyright 2020, Wiely-VCH. SEM (f) and TEM (g) images and (h) Elemental maps of C, Bi, and O for Bi2O3@C/HB. Reprinted with permission from Ref. [113]. Copyright 2021, American Chemical Society.
Fig. 9. (a) Illustration the preparation of Bi NP@MWCNTs. (b,d) TEM images. (c) Histograms of particle-size distributions of Bi NP@MWCNTs. Reprinted with permission from Ref. [119]. Copyright 2020, American Chemical Society. (e) SEM image of Bi2O3 nanosheets. (f,g) SEM and TEM images of Bi2S3-Bi2O3 nanosheets. (h) Elemental mapping images of Bi2S3-Bi2O3 nanosheets. Reprinted with permission from Ref. [133]. Copyright 2020, Royal Society of Chemistry.
Fig. 10. (a) Atomic structure of BiOBr and BiOBr-templated Bi catalyst after electroreduction. (b) In situ grazing-incidence wide-angle X-ray scattering (GIWAXS) of BiOBr at open-circuit potential and reducing potential showcasing the catalyst reconfiguration. Reprinted with permission from Ref. [104]. Copyright 2018, Wiely-VCH. (c) SEM image; (d) AFM image of BiOI nanosheets. Reprinted with permission from Ref. [80]. Copyright 2018, Springer-Nature.
Fig. 11. (a) Schematic illustration for the preparation of Bi dendrite electrode. Reprinted with permission from Ref. [138]. Copyright 2017, American Chemical Society.Transient current curves and SEM images of electrodeposited Bi films formed by direct-current 60 s (b), pulse-current 6 cycles (c), and direct-current 120 s (d). Reprinted with permission from Ref. [82]. Copyright 2017, Elsevier Ltd.
Fig. 12. (a) Schematic illustration of the scalable preparation of ultrathin Bi nanosheets via a liquid-phase exfoliation process. TEM (b), HRTEM (c) and AFM (d) images of few-layer Bi nanosheets. Reprinted with permission from Ref. [142]. Copyright 2018, Elsevier Ltd. (e) Schematic illustration of the electrochemical exfoliation method used for the preparation of BOCNS; TEM (f) and HRTEM (g) images. (h) SEAD pattern of electrochemically exfoliated BOCNS. Reprinted with permission from Ref. [145]. Copyright 2018, Wiely-VCH.
Fig. 13. (a) Schematic illustration of the fabrication of Bi nanostructure. Reprinted with permission from Ref. [146]. Copyright 2019, Royal Society of Chemistry. (b) Schematic illustration of Bi NPs for CO2RR. Reprinted with permission from Ref. [54]. Copyright 2016, American Chemical Society. (c) Schematic illustration of the synthesis process for Bi2O3-NGQDs. Reprinted with permission from Ref. [148]. Copyright 2018, Wiely-VCH.
Fig. 14. An illustration of a generic MOF, composed of tetrametallic SBUs (cyan polyhedra) linked together by terephthalate (gray). Reprinted with permission from Ref. [149]. Copyright 2019, Royal Society of Chemistry.
Fig. 15. (a) Schematic illustration of the preparation of Bi@C and Bi2O3@C catalysts. (b-d) TEM images of Bi2O3@C catalysts. Reprinted with permission from Ref. [124]. Copyright 2020, Wiely-VCH. (e) Schematic illustration for the preparation of Bi-ene. (f) AFM image; TEM (g) and HRTEM (h) images of Bi-ene. Reprinted with permission from Ref. [153]. Copyright 2020, Wiely-VCH.
Fig. 16. (a) Schematic illustration for the preparation process of the Bi2O3NSs@MCCM. Reprinted with permission from Ref. [156]. Copyright 2019, Wiely-VCH. (b) Schematic illustration for molten salts assisted synthesis of Bi nanosheets. Reprinted with permission from Ref. [157]. Copyright 2020, Wiely-VCH.
Catalyst | Electrolyte | Product | Potential | FE (%) | jpartial (mA cm-2) | Ref. |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Bi-CMEC | [BMIM]BF4 | CO | -1.95 V vs. RHE | 95 | 5.51 | [ |
POD-Bi | 0.5 mol L‒1 KHCO3 | HCOO- | -1.16 V vs. RHE | 95 | 57 | [ |
Ultrathin BiNS | 0.5 mol L‒1 NaHCO3 | HCOO- | -1 V vs. RHE | 100 | 12.5 | [ |
BiNS | 0.05 mol L‒1 H2SO4 + 3 mol L‒1 KCl | HCOO- | -1.23 V vs. RHE | 92.2 | 237.1 | [ |
Bi nanosheets | 0.1 mol L‒1 KHCO3 | HCOO- | -1.1 V vs. RHE | 86 | 14.2 | [ |
Bi@NPC | 0.1 mol L‒1 KHCO3 | HCOO- | -1.5 V vs. SCE | 92 | 14.4 | [ |
Cu foam@BiNW | 0.5 mol L‒1 NaHCO3 | HCOO- | -0.69 V vs. RHE | 95 | 15 | [ |
BNTs | 0.5 mol L‒1 NaHCO3 | HCOO- | -1 V vs. RHE | 97 | NA | [ |
NTD-Bi | 1 mol L‒1 KOH | HCOO- | -0.58 V vs. RHE | 98 | 205.8 | [ |
ED-Bi dendrites/BP | 0.5 mol L‒1 KHCO3 | HCOOH | -1 V vs. RHE | 92 | 35 | [ |
BiOx/C | 0.5 mol L‒1 NaHCO3 | HCOO- | -1.13 V vs. RHE | 93.4 | 16.1 | [ |
Bi2O3-5h | 0.5 mol L‒1 KHCO3 | HCOOH | -0.9 V vs. RHE | 91 | 8 | [ |
f-Bi2O3 | 0.1 mol L‒1 KHCO3 | HCOO- | -1.2 V vs. RHE | 87 | NA | [ |
Bi2O3NSs@MCCM | 0.1 mol L‒1 KHCO3 | HCOOH | -1.256 V vs. RHE | 93.8 | 15 | [ |
AgBi-500 | 0.1 mol L‒1 KHCO3 | HCOO- | -0.7 V vs. RHE | 94.3 | 12.52 | [ |
CuBi | 0.5 mol L‒1 KHCO3 | HCOOH | -1.2 V vs. RHE | 90.86 | 35 | [ |
BiSn-CF | 0.5 mol L‒1 KHCO3 | HCOO- | -1.14 V vs. RHE | 96 | 43.2 | [ |
Bi NP@MWCNTs | 0.5 mol L‒1 KHCO3 | HCOO- | -1.5 V vs. SCE | 95.2 | 10.18 | [ |
Bi/rGO | 0.1 mol L‒1 KHCO3 | HCOOH | -0.8 V vs. RHE | 98 | NA | [ |
Bi2O3@C-800 | 0.5 mol L‒1 KHCO3 | HCOO- | -0.28 V vs. RHE | 93 | 200 | [ |
Bi SAs/NC | 0.1 mol L‒1 KHCO3 | CO | -0.5 V vs. RHE | 97 | 3.9 | [ |
Mp-Bi | 0.5 mol L‒1 NaHCO3 | HCOO- | -0.9 V vs. RHE | 100 | 15 | [ |
SD-Bi | 0.5 mol L‒1 KHCO3 | HCOO- | -0.75 V vs. RHE | 84 | 5 | [ |
Bi-MoP nanosheets | 0.5 mol L‒1 NaHCO3 | HCOO- | -0.86 V vs. RHE | 93 | 30 | [ |
Bi dendrite | 0.5 mol L‒1 KHCO3 | HCOO- | -0.74 V vs. RHE | 89 | 2.7 | [ |
Bi nanoflake | 0.1 mol L‒1 KHCO3 | HCOO- | -0.6 V vs. RHE | 100 | NA | [ |
Bi-B | 0.5 mol L‒1 NaHCO3 | HCOO- | -1.8 V vs. SCE | 96.4 | 15.2 | [ |
BOCNS | 0.5 mol L‒1 NaHCO3 | HCOO- | -0.7 V vs. RHE | 85 | 9.35 | [ |
Bi45/GDE | 0.5 mol L‒1 KHCO3 | HCOO- | -1.45 V vs. SCE | 90 | 1.5 | [ |
Bi2O3-NGQDS | 0.5 mol L‒1 KHCO3 | HCOO- | -0.9 V vs. RHE | 98.1 | 18.1 | [ |
Table 1 The performance of Bi-based catalysts for CO2RR.
Catalyst | Electrolyte | Product | Potential | FE (%) | jpartial (mA cm-2) | Ref. |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Bi-CMEC | [BMIM]BF4 | CO | -1.95 V vs. RHE | 95 | 5.51 | [ |
POD-Bi | 0.5 mol L‒1 KHCO3 | HCOO- | -1.16 V vs. RHE | 95 | 57 | [ |
Ultrathin BiNS | 0.5 mol L‒1 NaHCO3 | HCOO- | -1 V vs. RHE | 100 | 12.5 | [ |
BiNS | 0.05 mol L‒1 H2SO4 + 3 mol L‒1 KCl | HCOO- | -1.23 V vs. RHE | 92.2 | 237.1 | [ |
Bi nanosheets | 0.1 mol L‒1 KHCO3 | HCOO- | -1.1 V vs. RHE | 86 | 14.2 | [ |
Bi@NPC | 0.1 mol L‒1 KHCO3 | HCOO- | -1.5 V vs. SCE | 92 | 14.4 | [ |
Cu foam@BiNW | 0.5 mol L‒1 NaHCO3 | HCOO- | -0.69 V vs. RHE | 95 | 15 | [ |
BNTs | 0.5 mol L‒1 NaHCO3 | HCOO- | -1 V vs. RHE | 97 | NA | [ |
NTD-Bi | 1 mol L‒1 KOH | HCOO- | -0.58 V vs. RHE | 98 | 205.8 | [ |
ED-Bi dendrites/BP | 0.5 mol L‒1 KHCO3 | HCOOH | -1 V vs. RHE | 92 | 35 | [ |
BiOx/C | 0.5 mol L‒1 NaHCO3 | HCOO- | -1.13 V vs. RHE | 93.4 | 16.1 | [ |
Bi2O3-5h | 0.5 mol L‒1 KHCO3 | HCOOH | -0.9 V vs. RHE | 91 | 8 | [ |
f-Bi2O3 | 0.1 mol L‒1 KHCO3 | HCOO- | -1.2 V vs. RHE | 87 | NA | [ |
Bi2O3NSs@MCCM | 0.1 mol L‒1 KHCO3 | HCOOH | -1.256 V vs. RHE | 93.8 | 15 | [ |
AgBi-500 | 0.1 mol L‒1 KHCO3 | HCOO- | -0.7 V vs. RHE | 94.3 | 12.52 | [ |
CuBi | 0.5 mol L‒1 KHCO3 | HCOOH | -1.2 V vs. RHE | 90.86 | 35 | [ |
BiSn-CF | 0.5 mol L‒1 KHCO3 | HCOO- | -1.14 V vs. RHE | 96 | 43.2 | [ |
Bi NP@MWCNTs | 0.5 mol L‒1 KHCO3 | HCOO- | -1.5 V vs. SCE | 95.2 | 10.18 | [ |
Bi/rGO | 0.1 mol L‒1 KHCO3 | HCOOH | -0.8 V vs. RHE | 98 | NA | [ |
Bi2O3@C-800 | 0.5 mol L‒1 KHCO3 | HCOO- | -0.28 V vs. RHE | 93 | 200 | [ |
Bi SAs/NC | 0.1 mol L‒1 KHCO3 | CO | -0.5 V vs. RHE | 97 | 3.9 | [ |
Mp-Bi | 0.5 mol L‒1 NaHCO3 | HCOO- | -0.9 V vs. RHE | 100 | 15 | [ |
SD-Bi | 0.5 mol L‒1 KHCO3 | HCOO- | -0.75 V vs. RHE | 84 | 5 | [ |
Bi-MoP nanosheets | 0.5 mol L‒1 NaHCO3 | HCOO- | -0.86 V vs. RHE | 93 | 30 | [ |
Bi dendrite | 0.5 mol L‒1 KHCO3 | HCOO- | -0.74 V vs. RHE | 89 | 2.7 | [ |
Bi nanoflake | 0.1 mol L‒1 KHCO3 | HCOO- | -0.6 V vs. RHE | 100 | NA | [ |
Bi-B | 0.5 mol L‒1 NaHCO3 | HCOO- | -1.8 V vs. SCE | 96.4 | 15.2 | [ |
BOCNS | 0.5 mol L‒1 NaHCO3 | HCOO- | -0.7 V vs. RHE | 85 | 9.35 | [ |
Bi45/GDE | 0.5 mol L‒1 KHCO3 | HCOO- | -1.45 V vs. SCE | 90 | 1.5 | [ |
Bi2O3-NGQDS | 0.5 mol L‒1 KHCO3 | HCOO- | -0.9 V vs. RHE | 98.1 | 18.1 | [ |
Fig. 17. TEM images (a,b), AFM image (c), LSV curves (d), FEformate (e) and jformate (f) for Bi-ene-NW. Reprinted with permission from Ref. [163]. Copyright 2021, Royal Society of Chemistry. LSV curves (g), FEformate (h) and the calculation (i) of ECSA for BiNSs with different thickness. Reprinted with permission from Ref. [164]. Copyright 2020, Springer Nature.
Fig. 18. (a) Chronoamperometric tests at different potentials in 1 mol L?1 KHCO3 and 1 mol L?1 KOH. (b) Polarization curves of nanotube-derived Bi (NTD-Bi) in 1 mol L?1 KHCO3 and 1 mol L?1 KOH. (c) Free-energy for formate production on ideal and defective surfaces. (d) The corresponding calculated polarization curves of CO2RR. Reprinted with permission from Ref. [75]. Copyright 2019, Springer Nature. (e) Free-energy for *OCHO and *COOH intermediate generation on defective Bi (001) facet. (f) Free-energy for *OCHO intermediate generation on ideal and defective Bi (001) facet. Reprinted with permission from Ref. [175]. Copyright 2020, Elsevier Ltd.
Fig. 19. (a) LSV curves in Ar-saturated or CO2-saturated 0.1 mol L?1 KHCO3. (b) FEs of various products at different applied potentials on Bi(B). Reprinted with permission from Ref. [181]. Copyright 2021, Wiley-VCH. FE of formate (c) and partial current density (d) of formate for S-BiOC. (e) Schematic illustration for the role of S-doping to promote the reduction of CO2 to formate. Reprinted with permission from Ref. [182]. Copyright 2021, Elsevier Ltd.
Fig. 20. (a) Current densities and FEformate at different potentials. (b) Tafel Slope over Bi-C/723 and bulk Bi for CO2RR. Reprinted with permission from Ref. [200]. Copyright 2021, Royal Society of Chemistry. jformate (c) and FEformate (d) at different potentials for Bi2S3-Bi2O3 NSs. Reprinted with permission from Ref. [196]. Copyright 2022, Wiely-VCH. LSV curves (e) and FEs (f) of products for Bi/Bi(Sn)Ox NWs. Reprinted with permission from Ref. [203]. Copyright 2021, American Chemical Society.
Fig. 21. (a) Potential-dependent operando Raman spectra of the CeO2/BiOCl. (b,c) Potential-dependent operando Raman spectra of the CeO2/BiOCl at different wavenumber region. Reprinted with permission from Ref. [132]. Copyright 2021, Oxford University Press. (d) In situ ATR-IR spectra collected under different applied potentials. Reprinted with permission from Ref. [153]. Copyright 2020, Wiely-VCH. (e,f) Operando XANES spectra of Bi L3-edge and corresponding Fourier transform of EXAFS spectrum as a function of electrochemical bias and with electroreduction time under electrochemical CO2 reduction conditions. Reprinted with permission from Ref. [152]. Copyright 2020, Elsevier Ltd. (g) STS map at + 283 mV of 1 BL=Bi2Te3 island showing the step edge. Reprinted with permission from Ref. [206]. Copyright 2012, American Physical Society. (h) DFT band-structure calculation and ARPES band dispersionthrough the Brillouin zon. (i) Differential conductivity of fully-planar bismuthene at different distances to the edge. Reprinted with permission from Ref. [207]. Copyright 2017, Science.
Fig. 22. (a) Sketch of the modules used in technical photosynthesis of 1-butanol and 1-hexanol from CO2 and H2O. Reprinted with permission from Ref. [208]. Copyright 2018, Springer-Nature. (b) Schematic illustration of the CO2 reduction cell with solid electrolyte. Reprinted with permission from Ref. [87]. Copyright 2019, Springer-Nature. (c) Schematic illustration of the flow cell configuration. Reprinted with permission from Ref. [75]. Copyright 2019, Springer-Nature. (d) Schematic illustration of the membrane electrode assembly. Reprinted with permission from Ref. [209]. Copyright 2021, American Chemical Society.
|
No related articles found! |
阅读次数 | ||||||
全文 |
|
|||||
摘要 |
|
|||||