有机电化学-电流驱动未来

doi:10.1016/S1872-2067(22)64197-4

催化学报

• •

有机电化学-电流驱动未来

周鹤洋^a, 唐海涛^a,*, 何卫民^b,*

^a广西师范大学化学与药学学院, 省部共建药用资源化学与药物分子工程国家重点实验室, 广西桂林541004;
^b南华大学化学化工学院, 湖南衡阳421001

收稿日期:2022-09-27 接受日期:2022-09-27
基金资助:
中央引导地方科技发展资金项目(桂科ZY21195014); 广西自然科学基金杰出青年基金项目(2021GXNSFFA220005); 国家自然科学基金(22061003, 22161008).

Organic electrochemistry-current transfer future

He-Yang Zhou^a, Hai-Tao Tang^a,*, Wei-Min He^b,*

^aState Key Laboratory for Chemistry and Molecular Engineering of Medicinal Resources, School of Chemistry and Pharmaceutical Sciences of Guangxi Normal University, Guilin 541004, Guangxi, China;
^bSchool of Chemistry and Chemical Engineering, University of South China, Hengyang 421001, Hunan, China

Received:2022-09-27 Accepted:2022-09-27
Contact: ^*E-mail: httang@gxnu.edu.cn (H. Tang), weiminhe@usc.edu.cn (W. He)
About author:Wei-Min He obtained Ph.D. degree from Hunan University in 2012 and is currently a Professor at University of South China. His research interest are development of green & sustainable technology in organic synthesis. Hai-Tao Tang received his Ph.D. degree from Xiamen University in 2017 and is currently an Associate Professor at Guangxi University. His current research interests focus on electrochemical synthesis and heterogeneous catalysis
Supported by:
Guangxi Natural Science Foundation of China (2021GXNSFFA220005), the Central Government Guides Local Science and Technology Development Fund Projects (guike ZY21195014) and the National Natural Science Foundation of China (22061003, 22161008).

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 电化学中最基本的作用力是电子-原子核之间的静电吸引力, 它通过施加电势使电子加入或脱离与原子核的相互作用, 因而, 它是最经典的氧化还原化学. 1800年第一个电池Volta Pile的发明实现了电子在电路中的流动, 标志着有机电化学的开端. 自19世纪以来, 在科技革命的浪潮中, 有机电化学合成取得了巨大发展, 例如美国Manuel M. Baizer教授研究的丙烯腈电解还原二聚合成己二腈实现了工业化生产; 纳尔科化学公司随后实现了四乙基铅的电化学工业化合成. 这两个工业化案例的成功, 使有机电化学合成进入了快速发展期. 氧化还原是化学反应中的三大基本反应之一, 对其进行研究, 能极大地促进人类社会的发展. 近年, 有机合成工作者通过电化学策略代替传统氧化还原试剂实现了一系列氧化脱氢交叉偶联、还原偶联、金属介导的C‒H键活化、不对称合成反应, 极大地丰富了复杂化合物的合成方法库.

关键词: 有机电化学合成, 电子转移, 氧化还原反应

Abstract: The electrostatic attraction between electrons and nuclei is the most fundamental force in electrochemistry. It causes electrons to enter or quit interactions with nuclei by providing potential. As a result, it is the most basic redox chemistry. Organic electrochemistry has made achievements in oxidative hydrogen evolution coupling and sacrificial anode electroreduction in recent years due to its green and efficient capacity to create reactive intermediates. This paper primarily describes the fields of optimizing electrode materials, developing new electrolytic catalysts, paired electrolysis, photoelectrocatalysis, bioelectrosynthesis, and artificial intelligence-assisted electrosynthesis from the perspectives of reaction mechanism optimization and interdisciplinary combination.

Key words: Organic electrochemical synthesis, Electron transfer, Redox reaction

周鹤洋, 唐海涛, 何卫民. 有机电化学-电流驱动未来[J]. 催化学报, DOI: 10.1016/S1872-2067(22)64197-4.

He-Yang Zhou, Hai-Tao Tang, Wei-Min He. Organic electrochemistry-current transfer future[J]. Chinese Journal of Catalysis, DOI: 10.1016/S1872-2067(22)64197-4.

参考文献

[1] M. D. Karkas, O. Verho, E. V. Johnston, B. Åkermark,Chem. Rev., 2014, 114, 11863-12001.
[2] M. Shao, Q. Chang, J. P. Dodelet, R. Chenitz,Chem. Rev., 2016, 116, 3594-3657.
[3] Y. Kawamata, P. S. Baran,Joule, 2020, 4, 701-704.
[4] T. H. Meyer, I. Choi, C. Tian, L. Ackermann,Chem, 2020, 6, 2484-2496.
[5] S. H. Shi, Y. Liang, N. Jiao,Chem. Rev., 2021, 121, 485-505.
[6] Y. Yuan, A. Lei,Acc. Chem. Res., 2019, 52, 3309-3324.
[7] Y. Yuan, J. Yang, A. Lei,Chem. Soc. Rev., 2021, 50, 10058-10086.
[8] P. Xiong, H. C. Xu,Acc. Chem. Res., 2019, 52, 3339-3350.
[9] X. Chang, Q. Zhang, C. Guo,Angew. Chem. Int. Ed., 2020, 59, 12612-12622.
[10] L. Li, Y. Li, N. Fu, L. Zhang, S. Luo,Angew. Chem. Int. Ed., 2020, 59, 14347-14351.
[11] L. F. T.Novaes, J. Liu, Y. Shen, L. Lu, J. M. Meinhardt, S. Lin,Chem. Soc. Rev., 2021, 50, 7941-8002.
[12] S. Lips, S. R. Waldvogel,ChemElectroChem, 2019, 6, 1649-1660.
[13] B. K. Peters, K. X. Rodriguez, S. H. Reisberg, S. B. Beil, D. P. Hickey, Y. Kawamata, M. Collins, J. Starr, L. Chen, S. Udyavara, K. Klunder, T. J. Gorey, S. L. Anderson, M. Neurock, S. D. Minteer, P. S. Baran,Science, 2019, 363, 838-845.
[14] F. Wang, S. S. Stahl,Acc. Chem. Res., 2020, 53, 561-574.
[15] X. Cheng, A. Lei, T. S. Mei, H. C. Xu, K. Xu, C. Zeng,CCS Chem., 2022, 4, 1120-1152.
[16] Y. Q. Huang, Z. J. Wu, L. Zhu, Q. Gu, X. Lu, S. L. You, T. S. Mei,CCS Chem., 2022, 4, 3181-3189.
[17] A. A.Folgueiras-Amador, A. E. Teuten, M. Salam-Perez, J. E. Pearce, G. Denuault, D. Pletcher, P. J. Parsons, D. C. Harrowven, R. C. D. Brown,Angew. Chem. Int. Ed., 2022, 61, e202203694.
[18] C. Y. Cai, Y. T. Zheng, J. F. Li, H. C. Xu,J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2022, 144, 11980-11985.
[19] Y. Kawamata, J. C. Vantourout, D. P. Hickey, P. Bai, L. Chen, Q. Hou, W. Qiao, K. Barman, M. A. Edwards, A. F.Garrido-Castro, J. N. deGruyter, H. Nakamura, K. Knouse, C. Qin, K. J. Clay, D. Bao, C. Li, J. T. Starr, C. Garcia-Irizarry, N. Sach, H. S. White, M. Neurock, S. D. Minteer, P. S. Baran,J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2019, 141, 6392-6402.
[20] L. Zhang, X. Hu,Chem. Sci., 2020, 11, 10786-10791.
[21] Y. Dvorkin, M. A. Modestino, A. I. Silverman,iScience, 2022, 23, 101337.
[22] S. Rodrigo, D. Gunasekera, J. P. Mahajan, L. Luo,Curr. Opin. Electrochem., 2021, 28, 100712.
[23] Y. Liu, B. Shi, Z. Liu, R. Gao, C. Huang, H. Alhumade, S. Wang, X. Qi, A. Lei,J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2021, 143, 20863-20872.
[24] L. Zeng, H. Li, J. Hu, D. Zhang, J. Hu, P. Peng, S. Wang, R. Shi, J. Peng, C. W. Pao, J. L. Chen, J. F. Lee, H. Zhang, Y. H. Chen, A. Lei,Nat. Catal., 2020, 3, 438-445.
[25] B. R. Walker, S. Manabe, A. T. Brusoe, C. S. Sevov,J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2021, 143, 6257-6265
[26] J. P. Barham, B. Kçnig,Angew. Chem. Int. Ed., 2020, 59, 11732-11747.
[27] T. Shen, T. H. Lambert, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2021, 143, 23, 8597-8602.
[28] C. Y. Cai, X. L. Lai, Y. Wang, H. H. Hu, J. Song, Y. Yang, C. Wang, H. C. Xu,Nat. Catal., 2022, 5, 943-951.
[29] Y. J. Chen, W. H. Deng, J. D. Guo, R. N. Ci, C. Zhou, B. Chen, X. B. Li, X. N. Guo, R. Z. Liao, C. H. Tung, L. Z. Wu, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2022, 144, 37, 17261-17268.
[30] H. Chen, R. Cai, J. Patel, F. Dong, H. Chen, S. D. Minteer,J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2019, 141, 4963-4971.
[31] H. Chen, O. Simoska, K. Lim, M. Grattieri, M. Yuan, F. Dong, Y. S. Lee, K. Beaver, S. Weliwatte, E. M. Gaffney, S. D. Minteer,Chem. Rev., 2020, 120, 12903-12993.
[32] V. Rosso, J. Albrecht, F. Roberts, J. M. Janey,React. Chem. Eng., 2019, 4, 1646-1657.

有机电化学-电流驱动未来

Organic electrochemistry-current transfer future

PDF

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

[1]	欧伟, 邱春天, 苏陈良. 光、电催化合成氘代化学品和药物分子研究综述[J]. 催化学报, 2022, 43(4): 956-970.
[2]	高学庆, 刘肖梦, 杨树姣, 张伟, 林海平, 曹睿. 黑磷夹层氧化钴纳米片构筑电催化水氧化的仿生通道[J]. 催化学报, 2022, 43(4): 1123-1130.
[3]	S. Wageh, Ahmed A. Al-Ghamdi, Omar A. Al-Hartomy, Maged F. Alotaibi, 王临曦. CdS/聚合物梯形产氢光催化剂及其原位光照电子转移机制[J]. 催化学报, 2022, 43(3): 586-588.
[4]	王黎, 李雨坤, 吴超, 李鑫, 邵国胜, 张鹏. 追踪SrTiO₃/CoP/Mo₂C纳米纤维中的电荷转移路径以增强光催化产生太阳燃料[J]. 催化学报, 2022, 43(2): 507-518.
[5]	张建军, 杨高元, 何博文, 程蓓, 李佑稷, 梁桂杰, 王临曦. CdS/Pt异质结光催化剂光解水的电子转移动力学[J]. 催化学报, 2022, 43(10): 2530-2538.
[6]	黄睿, 温蕴周, 彭慧胜, 张波. 解耦质子-电子传输促进Ru-Pb二元电催化剂上的OER动力学[J]. 催化学报, 2022, 43(1): 130-138.
[7]	曾辉炎, 曾衍铨, 漆俊, 顾龙, 洪恩纳, 司锐, 杨纯臻. 析氧反应中催化剂-电解质界面的质子动力学研究[J]. 催化学报, 2022, 43(1): 139-147.
[8]	王中明, 王洪, 王笑笑, 陈旬, 于岩, 戴文新, 付贤智. 通过调节反应物气体吸附电子转移行为实现热驱动ZnO光催化CO还原和H₂氧化反应[J]. 催化学报, 2021, 42(9): 1538-1552.
[9]	都京, 马媛媛, 谭华桥, 康振辉, 李阳光. 多金属氧酸盐材料在二氧化碳电催化还原领域中的研究进展[J]. 催化学报, 2021, 42(6): 920-937.
[10]	蒋军生, 韦何磊, 谭爱东, 司锐, 张伟德, 余宇翔. 碳辅助金属配合物热解法制备高含量Fe-N₄单原子催化剂用于氧还原反应[J]. 催化学报, 2021, 42(5): 753-761.
[11]	吴凡, 贺雷, 李文翠, 路饶, 王阳, 陆安慧. 氮化硼负载的高分散Au-CuO_x纳米颗粒用于低温CO氧化[J]. 催化学报, 2021, 42(3): 388-395.
[12]	徐佳佳, 朱志国, 苏婷, 廖卫平, 邓昌亮, 郝冬梅, 赵玉潮, 任万忠, 吕宏缨. Fe-Anderson型多金属氧酸盐和苯磺酸基低共熔溶剂仿生体系的构建及其柴油绿色氧化脱硫[J]. 催化学报, 2020, 41(5): 868-876.
[13]	杨凯, 李笑笑, 余长林, 曾德彬, 陈范云, 张开莲, 黄微雅, 纪红兵. 异质/同质相结高效光催化的研究进展:以相变构建为例[J]. 催化学报, 2019, 40(6): 796-818.
[14]	王苹, 徐顺秋, 陈峰, 余火根. Ni纳米粒子作为电子转移剂和NiS_x作为产氢界面活性位协同增强TiO₂光催化制氢性能[J]. 催化学报, 2019, 40(3): 343-351.
[15]	张国亭, 边长亮, 雷爱文. 可见光参与的氧化偶联反应研究进展[J]. 催化学报, 2015, 36(9): 1428-1439.