物相到性能: 碳化钼在逆水煤气变换反应中的先进作用

doi:10.1016/S1872-2067(26)65036-X

催化学报 ›› 2026, Vol. 85: 1-12.DOI: 10.1016/S1872-2067(26)65036-X

• 视角 • 下一篇

物相到性能: 碳化钼在逆水煤气变换反应中的先进作用

Fleur A. E. Bruekers, Tess I. van Benthem, Rajamohanan Sobhana Anju(), N. Raveendran Shiju()

阿姆斯特丹大学范特霍夫分子科学研究所催化工程组, 阿姆斯特丹, 荷兰

收稿日期:2025-09-22 接受日期:2025-12-12 出版日期:2026-06-18 发布日期:2026-05-18
通讯作者: *电子信箱: a.rajamohanansobhana@uva.nl (R. S. Anju),
n.r.shiju@uva.nl (N. R. Shiju).
作者简介:
¹共同第一作者.

Phase to performance: The advancing role of molybdenum carbides in reverse water-gas shift reaction

Fleur A. E. Bruekers, Tess I. van Benthem, Rajamohanan Sobhana Anju(), N. Raveendran Shiju()

Catalysis Engineering Group, Van ‘t Hoff Institute for Molecular Sciences, University of Amsterdam, Science Park 904, 1090GD Amsterdam, The Netherlands

Received:2025-09-22 Accepted:2025-12-12 Online:2026-06-18 Published:2026-05-18
Contact: *E-mail: a.rajamohanansobhana@uva.nl (R. S. Anju),
n.r.shiju@uva.nl (N. R. Shiju).
About author:Dr. Anju Rajamohanan Sobhana (University of Amsterdam), was a Marie Skłodowska-Curie Postdoctoral Fellow at the University of Amsterdam, The Netherlands (2024-2025). Dr. Anju serves as Assistant Professor at NSS College, Ottapalam, India since 2018. She received her Ph.D. degree from the Indian Institute of Technology (IIT) Madras (India) in 2015. She carried out postdoctoral research at Gulf University for Science and Technology (Kuwait), Texas A&M University at Qatar, and Qatar Energy Environment and Research Institute (Qatar). Her research interests mainly focus on organometallic chemistry, boron cluster chemistry, catalysis and CO₂ valorisation. She has published 23 peer-reviewed research articles in leading international journals.
Shiju Raveendran leads the Catalysis Engineering Group at the University of Amsterdam. He earned his Ph.D. in catalysis from the National Chemical Laboratory in Pune, India, and was subsequently awarded a prestigious Royal Society (UK) Postdoctoral Fellowship. He carried out postdoctoral research in both the United Kingdom and the United States before joining the University of Amsterdam as a faculty member. He currently serves as Editor-in-Chief of the Elsevier journal Sustainable Chemistry for Climate Action and is a member of the editorial boards of FlatChem and EnergyChem. His honors include the Amsterdam Science Park Ideas Prize and the J. N. Mukherjee Memorial Award from the Indian Chemical Society, recognizing his societally impactful contributions to Chemical Engineering and Green Chemistry. His research centres on the development of sustainable technologies by integrating reaction engineering, chemistry, and materials science.
¹Contributed equally to this work.

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

碳化钼(MoC_x)具有独特的类贵金属反应活性、优异的热稳定性及规模化制备潜力, 其催化性能超越传统过渡金属, 成为逆水煤气变换(RWGS)反应的高效催化剂. 2024-2025年的最新研究进展显示, 此前未被充分探索的α-MoC相表现出巨大的应用潜力, 其具有高活性和高CO选择性, 且碳化物动态参与到二氧化碳活化过程中. 原位机理研究和物相-活性的构效关系等些研究进展表明, MoC_x可用作RWGS和下游二氧化碳资源化利用的转换平台. 然而, 目前还存在一些关键问题有待解决, 如表面碳空位的确切作用、MoC_x在动态RWGS条件下的长期稳定性、合成方法的规模化潜力, 以及在工业应用中的耐久性等. 本文集中综述了最近进展, 同时概述了将MoC_x催化剂用于循环碳技术和工业二氧化碳利用所面临的当前挑战和未来研究方向.

关键词: 碳化钼, ·逆水煤气变换反应, CO₂利用, 催化, CO₂加氢

Abstract:

Molybdenum carbides (MoC_x) are rapidly emerging as efficient catalysts for the reverse water-gas shift (RWGS) reaction, outperforming conventional transition metals with their unique blend of noble-metal-like reactivity, exceptional thermal stability, and scalability. Recent advances in 2024-2025 have unlocked the excellent potential of the previously underexplored α-MoC phase, revealing unprecedented activity, robust CO selectivity, and dynamic carbidic carbon participation in CO₂ activation. These advances, alongside in situ mechanistic insights and phase-activity correlations, make a compelling case for MoC_x as a transformative platform for RWGS and downstream CO₂ valorization. Despite these advances, critical questions remain regarding the precise role of surface carbon vacancies, the long-term stability of MoC_x under dynamic RWGS conditions, the scalability of synthesis methods, and the durability for industrial deployment. This perspective provides the first focused synthesis of recent developments, while outlining current challenges and future research opportunities needed to position MoC_x catalysts at the forefront of circular carbon technologies and industrial CO₂ utilization.

Key words: Molybdenum carbide, Reverse water-gas shift, CO₂ utilization, Catalysis, CO₂ hydrogenation

Fleur A. E. Bruekers, Tess I. van Benthem, Rajamohanan Sobhana Anju, N. Raveendran Shiju. 物相到性能: 碳化钼在逆水煤气变换反应中的先进作用[J]. 催化学报, 2026, 85: 1-12.

Fleur A. E. Bruekers, Tess I. van Benthem, Rajamohanan Sobhana Anju, N. Raveendran Shiju. Phase to performance: The advancing role of molybdenum carbides in reverse water-gas shift reaction[J]. Chinese Journal of Catalysis, 2026, 85: 1-12.

×
扫码分享

导出引用管理器 EndNote|Ris|BibTeX

链接本文: https://www.cjcatal.com/CN/10.1016/S1872-2067(26)65036-X

https://www.cjcatal.com/CN/Y2026/V85/I6/1

图/表 5

Table 1 Summary of the molybdenum carbide catalysts including their crystal structure, catalytic performance (CO rate), and operational conditions (space velocity, temperature). All catalysts were reported at a pressure of 1 bar, except K-Mo2C@γ-Al2O3 reported at 20 bar.

Catalyst (year of publication)	Phase (structure)	Space velocity (mL g_cat^-1 h^-1)	CO rate (mmol g_cat^-1 h^-1)	Temperature (°C)	Ref.
2D-Mo₂C (2021)	(hexagonal)	120000	142.3	430	[18]
β-Mo₂C (2017)	β-Mo₂C (HCP)	300000	720.0	600	[14]
Nanowired β-Mo₂C (2016)	β-Mo₂C (HCP)	36000	61.7	600	[10]
Nanowired α-MoC_1-_x (2016)	cubic α-MoC_1-_x (FCC)	36000	61.7	600	[10]
cubic α-Mo₂C (2024)	α-Mo₂C (FCC)	100000	395.0	600	[13]
α-Mo₂C (2017)	hexagonal α-Mo₂C (hexagonal)	3000	1.7	400	[8]
Co/β-Mo₂C (7.5 wt%) (2014)	β-Mo₂C (HCP)	300000	49.8	300	[15]
Cu/β-Mo₂C (1.3 wt%) (2017)	β-Mo₂C (HCP)	300000	1703.0	600	[14]
Cs-Mo₂C (2019)	β-Mo₂C (HCP)	12000	24.6	600	[16]
1K-Cu/Mo₂C (2021)	β-Mo₂C	84000	176.0	600	[32]
K-Mo₂C@γ-Al₂O₃ (1:4:15) (20 wt%) (2022)	β-Mo₂C	3600	71.2	300	[33]
Mo_xC/SiO₂ (2022)	β-Mo₂C (HCP) & MoC (FCC)	20000	17.0	400	[19]
Mo_xC/Al₂O₃ (2022)	—	20000	14.8	400	[19]
MoC (2024)	hexagonal β-Mo₂C → hexagonal MoC	2840000	7544.6	600	[5]
α-MoC (2025)	α-MoC (FCC)	1800000	926,6	300	[11]
3D printed Mo₂C (10 wt% Mo) (2024)	δ-cubic MoC : η-Mo₃C₂	1187	17.6	600	[34]
Mo_n-Mo₂C cluster (1.3 wt% Mo) (2024)	β-Mo₂C	30000	2,071	400	[35]
Ir-MoO₃ (0.5 wt% Ir) (2024)	cubic α-MoC (FCC)	2000000	17500	600	[36]

Fig. 1. Crystal structures of HCP (A) and FCC (B) like catalysts (Mo: cyan; C: grey). Reprinted with permission from Ref. [17]. Copyright 2016, Elsevier Ltd. (C) Schematic depiction of cubic α-Mo2C (Mo: purple; C: grey). Reprinted with permission from Ref. [13], Copyright © 2024 The Author(s). (D) Schematic depiction of 2D-Mo2C (Mo: blue; C: grey). Reprinted with permission from Ref. [18]. Copyright 2021, The Author(s).

Fig. 2. (A) Carbidic-carbon-participation during the RWGS reaction over α-MoC catalysts. Reprinted with permission from Ref. 39. Copyright 2024, American Chemical Society should read as Reprinted with permission from Ref 35, Copyright © 2024 American Chemical Society. (B) HRETM images of MoC showing the structural evolution with carbon flow during RWGS reaction (top) and superimposition of successive images form the in situ HRTEM sequence (red for high temperature image, green for low temperature image and yellow is the overlap of red and green, bottom) Reprinted with permission from Ref. [11]. Copyright 2024, Wiley-VCH GmbH. (C) Schematic diagram of the positive feedback between catalytic activity and structural evolution of β-Mo2N under RWGS reaction. Reprinted with permission from Ref. [37]. Copyright 2024, The Author(s). (D) In-situ carburization of MoOx leading to the formation of β-Mo2C followed by hexagonal MoC. Reprinted with permission from Ref. [5]. Copyright 2024, Wiley-VCH GmbH. (E) Structural diversity of co-generated Mo species boosting RWGS activity. Reprinted with permission from Ref. [39]. Copyright 2024, American Chemical Society.

Table 2 RWGS pathways over representative Mo-C catalysts.

Catalyst	Dominant RWGS pathway	Remarks
β-Mo₂C (bulk/nanocrystalline) [18]	dissociative	Mo-terminated Mo₂C surfaces favor CO₂ dissociation.
α-Mo₂C (bulk/nanocrystalline) [13]	H₂-assisted redox mechanism	phase purity, weak CO binding, and interstitial O underpin performance
α-MoC (FCC) [11]	carbon cycle	dynamic carbon flux; Bulk-surface-gas exchange of carbon; lattice carbon participation than pure surface dissociation.
α-MoC with MoO_xC_y [36]	carbon cycle (Vacancy mediated)	distinct from classic redox/associative mechanism; CO₂-derived C inserts into Mo-Mo vacancies on MoO_xC_y, forms CO, and the vacancy regenerates by abstracting carbidic C.
In-situ carburized H_xMoO_y→MoC [5]	activation-driven	CO induced in situ carburization under RWGS; very high CO productivity rate
α-MoC_1-_x [10]	associative	formate decomposition mechanism.

Fig. 3. (A) Comparison of CO productivity among molybdenum carbides (star symbol, 1-19) and other catalysts reported in literature (circle symbol, 20-36). (B) Comparison of CO selectivity (above the dashed line) of the different catalysts and the CO2 conversion (below the dashed line) over time on stream. Table S1 shows the performance metrics of the catalysts shown in Fig. 3 [8,10,11,13,15,16,18,19,32-35,43], along with additional state-of-the-art RWGS catalysts [16,44-58].

参考文献

[1]	M. Ronda-Lloret, G. Rothenberg, N. R. Shiju, ChemSusChem, 2019, 12, 3896-3914.
[2]	V. S. Marakatti, M. Ronda-Lloret M,. Krajčí B,. Joseph C,. Marini J. J., Delgado F,. Devred N. R., Shiju E. M. Gaigneaux, Catal. Sci. Technol., 2022, 12, 686-706.
[3]	M. Gonz lez-Castaño, B. Dorneanu, H. Arellano-García, React. Chem. Eng., 2021, 6, 954-976.
[4]	T. Mathew, S. S. Saju, S. N. Raveendran, in: Engineering Solutions for CO₂ Conversion, T. R. Reina, H. Arellano-García, J. A. Odriozola, eds., Wiley-VCH, Weinheim, 2021, 281-316.
[5]	X. Du R,. Li H,. Xin Y,. Fan C,. Liu X,. Feng J,. Wang C,. Dong C,. Wang D,. Li Q,. Fu X. Bao, Angew. Chem. Int. Ed., 2024, 63, e202411761.
[6]	X. Cao, H. Bai, W. Wu, H. Bao, Y. Li, Int. J. Hydrog. Energy, 2022, 47, 38517-38523.
[7]	A. De Zanet, S. A. Kondrat, Johns. Matthey Technol. Rev., 2022, 66, 285-315.
[8]	X. Liu C,. Kunkel P,. Ramírez de la Piscina N,. Homs F,. Viñes F. Illas, ACS Catal., 2017, 7, 4323-4335.
[9]	H. H. Hwu, J. G. Chen, Chem. Rev., 2005, 105, 185-212.
[10]	J. Gao Y,. Wu C,. Jia Z,. Zhong F,. Gao Y,. Yang B. Liu, Catal. Commun., 2016, 84, 147-150.
[11]	M. Zhang, Y. Zhu, J. Yan, J. Xie, T. Yu, M. Peng, J. Zhao, Y. Xu, A. Li, C. Jia, L. He, M. Wang, W. Zhou, R. Wang, H. Jiang, C. Shi, J. Rodriguez, D. Ma, Angew. Chem. Int. Ed., 2025, 64, e202418645.
[12]	Q. Rong, W. Ding, G. Liu, X. Fu, Y. Shi, Z. Zhang, Z. Yao, RSC Adv., 2025, 15, 8346-8353.
[13]	M. Ahmadi Khoshooei, X. Wang, G. Vitale, F. Formalik, K. O. Kirlikovali, R. Q. Snurr, P. Pereira-Almao, O. K. Farha, Science, 2024, 384, 540-546.
[14]	X. Zhang, X. Zhu, L. Lin, S. Yao, M. Zhang, X. Liu, X. Wang, Y.-W. Li, C. Shi, D. Ma, ACS Catal., 2017, 7, 912-918.
[15]	M. D. Porosoff, X. Yang J. A., Boscoboinik J. G. Chen, Angew. Chem. Int. Ed., 2014, 53, 6705-6709.
[16]	Q. Zhang, L. Pastor-Pérez, S. Gu, T. Ramirez Reina, Catalysts, 2020, 10, 955.
[17]	Y. Ma G,. Guan X,. Hao J,. Cao A. Abudula, Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev., 2017, 75, 1101-1129.
[18]	H. Zhou, Z. Chen, E. Kountoupi, A. Tsoukalou, P. M. Abdala, P. Florian, A. Fedorov, C. R. Müller, Nat. Commun., 2021, 12, 5510.
[19]	A. Pajares, X. Liu, J. R. Busacker, P. Ramírez de la Piscina, N. Homs, Nanomaterials, 2022, 12, 3165.
[20]	Y. Xu Y,. Yang M,. Wu X,. Yang X,. Bie S,. Zhang Q,. Li Y,. Zhang C,. Zhang R. E., Przekop B,. Sztorch D,. Brzakalski H. Zhou, Acta Phys.-Chim. Sin., 2024, 40, 2304003.
[21]	T. Wang, S. Wang, Y.-W. Li, J. Wang, H. Jiao, J. Phys. Chem. C, 2012, 116, 6340-6348.
[22]	X. Yao Z,. Wei J,. Mei X,. Guo X. Tian, RSC Adv., 2025, 15, 460-466.
[23]	C. de Oliveira, D. R. Salahub, H. A. de Abreu, H. A. Duarte, J. Phys. Chem. C, 2014, 118, 25517-25524.
[24]	J. Guo Y,. Feng C,. Tang L,. Wang X,. Qing Q,. Yang X. Ren, Materials, 2022, 15, 4719.
[25]	J. Zhang, K. Feng, Z. Li, B. Yang, B. Yan, K.-H. Luo, JACS Au, 2023, 3, 2736-2748.
[26]	C. F. Holder, J. R. Morse P. M., Barboun A. R., Shabaev J. W., Baldwin H. D. Willauer, Catal. Sci. Technol., 2023, 13, 2685-2695.
[27]	J. G. Chen, Chem. Rev., 1996, 96, 1477-1498.
[28]	M. D. Porosoff, J. W. Baldwin X,. Peng G,. Mpourmpakis H. D. Willauer, ChemSusChem, 2017, 10, 2408-2415.
[29]	J. R. Morse, M. Juneau, J. W. Baldwin, M. D. Porosoff, H. D. Willauer, J. CO₂ Util., 2020, 35, 38-46.
[30]	Q. Yang, V. A. Kondratenko, S. A. Petrov, D. E. Doronkin, E. Saraçi, H. Lund, A. Arinchtein, R. Kraehnert, A. S. Skrypnik, A. A. Matvienko, E. V. Kondratenko, Angew. Chem. Int. Ed., 2022, 61, e202116517.
[31]	A. G. Galallah, M. K. Albolkany, A. E. Rashed, W. Sadik, A.-G. El-Demerdash, A. A. El-Moneim, J. Environ. Chem. Eng., 2024, 12, 113380.
[32]	J. Xu X,. Gong R,. Hu Z.-W., Liu Z.-T. Liu, Mol. Catal., 2021, 516, 111954.
[33]	J. R. Morse, C. F. Holder J. W., Baldwin H. D. Willauer, Energies, 2022, 15, 7109.
[34]	A. Pajares, J. Andrade-Arvizu, D. Jain, M. Monai, J. Lefevere, P. R. de la Piscina, N. Homs, B. Michielsen, Chem. Eng. J., 2024, 482, 149048.
[35]	S. Cao Z,. Guan Y,. Ma B,. Xu J,. Ma W,. Chu R,. Zhang G,. Giambastiani Y. Liu, ACS Catal., 2024, 14, 10939-10950.
[36]	X. Sun J,. Yu H,. Zada Y,. Han L,. Zhang H,. Chen W,. Yin J. Sun, Nat. Chem., 2024, 16, 2044-2053.
[37]	H. Xin R,. Li L,. Lin R,. Mu M,. Li D,. Li Q,. Fu X. Bao, Nat. Commun., 2024, 15, 3100.
[38]	X. Li J,. Wan M,. Sun Y,. Zhang Z,. Yang X,. Wang J,. Zhu Y,. Ma Z,. Zhao Y. Yang, Ind. Eng. Chem. Res., 2025, 64, 9939-9950.
[39]	Qin C,. Ma W. W., Wang K,. Xu H,. Yan D,. Xiao C. J., Jia Q,. Fu D. Ma, Nat Commun., 2022, 13(1), 5800.
[40]	M. Ronda-Lloret, V. S. Marakatti, W. G. Sloof, J. J. Delgado, A. Sepúlveda-Escribano, E. V. Ramos-Fernandez, G. Rothenberg, N. R. Shiju, ChemSusChem, 2020, 13, 6401-6408.
[41]	M. Ronda-Lloret, L. Yang, M. Hammerton, V. S. Marakatti, M. Tromp, Z. Sofer, A. Sepúlveda-Escribano, E. V. Ramos-Fernandez, J. J. Delgado, G. Rothenberg, T. Ramirez Reina, N. R. Shiju, ACS Sustainable Chem. Eng., 2021, 9, 4957-4966.
[42]	X. Sun J,. Yu S,. Cao A,. Zimina B. B., Sarma J.-D., Grunwaldt H,. Xu S,. Li Y,. Liu J. Sun, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2022, 144, 22589-22598.
[43]	S. Akmach, A. Jiang, M. Ashirwadam, S. S. El Kaddouri, D. Kaliaguine, S. A. Simakov,J. CO₂ Util., 2026, 105, 103327.
[44]	X. Li J,. Lin L,. Li Y,. Huang X,. Pan S. E., Collins Y,. Ren Y,. Su L,. Kang X,. Liu Y,. Zhou H,. Wang A,. Wang B,. Qiao X,. Wang T. Zhang, Angew. Chem. Int. Ed., 2020, 59, 19983-19989.
[45]	A. M. Bahmanpour, F. Héroguel M,. Kılıç C. J., Baranowski L,. Artiglia U,. Röthlisberger J. S., Luterbacher O. Kröcher, ACS Catal., 2019, 9, 6243-6251.
[46]	H.-X. Liu, S.-Q. Li, W.-W. Wang, W.-Z. Yu, W.-J. Zhang, C. Ma, C.-J. Jia, Nat. Commun., 2022, 13, 867.
[47]	Y. A. Daza, D., Maiti R. A., Kent V. R., Bhethanabotla J. N. Kuhn, Catal. Today, 2015, 258, 691-698.
[48]	B. Liang, H. Duan, X. Su, X. Chen, Y. Huang, X. Chen, J. J. Delgado, T. Zhang, Catal. Today, 2017, 281, 319-326.
[49]	Y. Li Z,. Zhao W,. Lu H,. Zhu F,. Sun B,. Mei Z,. Jiang Y,. Lyu X,. Chen L,. Guo T,. Wu X,. Ma Y,. Meng Y. Ding, Appl. Catal. B, 2023, 324, 122298.
[50]	L.-X. Wang, E. Guan, Z. Wang, L. Wang, Z. Gong, Y. Cui, Z. Yang, C. Wang, J. Zhang, X. Meng, P. Hu, X.-Q. Gong, B. C. Gates, F.-S. Xiao, ACS Catal., 2020, 10, 9261-9270.
[51]	C.-S. Chen, W.-H. Cheng, S.-S. Lin, Catal. Lett., 2000, 68, 45-48.
[52]	J.-N. Park, E. W. McFarland, J. Catal., 2009, 266, 92-97.
[53]	L. Yang, L. Pastor-Pérez, J. J. Villora-Pico, A. Sepúlveda-Escribano, F. Tian, M. Zhu, Y.-F. Han, T. Ramirez Reina, ACS Sustainable Chem. Eng., 2021, 9, 12155-12166.
[54]	S. Li Y,. Xu H,. Wang B,. Teng Q,. Liu Q,. Li L,. Xu X,. Liu J. Lu, Angew. Chem. Int. Ed., 2023, 62, e202218167.
[55]	W. Li G,. Zhang X,. Jiang Y,. Liu J,. Zhu F,. Ding Z,. Liu X,. Guo C. Song, ACS Catal., 2019, 9, 2739-2751.
[56]	H. Kang, L. Zhu, S. Li, S. Yu, Y. Niu, B. Zhang, W. Chu, X. Liu, S. Perathoner, G. Centi, Y. Liu, Nat. Catal., 2023, 6, 1062-1072.
[57]	L. Wang, S. Zhang, Y. Liu, J. Rare Earths, 2008, 26, 66-70.
[58]	X. Chen, X. Su, H. Duan, B. Liang, Y. Huang, T. Zhang, Catal. Today, 2017, 281, 312-318.
[59]	A. B. Dongil, Q. Zhang L,. Pastor-Pérez T,. Ramírez-Reina A,. Guerrero-Ruiz I. Rodríguez-Ramos, Catalysts, 2020, 10, 1213.
[60]	Y. Zhou, W. Huang, X. Zhang, M. Wang, L. Zhang, J. Shi, Chem., 2017, 23, 17029-17036.
[61]	G. Vitale, M. L. Frauwallner, C. E. Scott, P. Pereira-Almao, Appl. Catal. A, 2011, 408, 178-186.
[62]	E. K. Athanassiou, R. N. Grass W. J. Stark, Aerosol Sci. Technol., 2010, 44, 161-172.
[63]	R. Mueller, L. Mädler, S. E. Pratsinis, Chem. Eng. Sci., 2003, 58, 1969-1976.

物相到性能: 碳化钼在逆水煤气变换反应中的先进作用

Phase to performance: The advancing role of molybdenum carbides in reverse water-gas shift reaction

RichHTML

PDF

Supporting Information

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

扫码分享

图/表 5

参考文献

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

[1]	李昊聪, 张明, 杨恒博, 陈晓岚, 吕琪妍, 屈凌波, 於兵. 基于催化量电子供体-受体复合物自由基接力选择性地实现烯烃氰烷基双官能化[J]. 催化学报, 2026, 86(7): 244-253.
[2]	刘均炎, 邵涛, 彭珣, 刘升卫. 配体-缺陷协同催化剂局部增强CO₂浓度实现高效低浓度CO₂电化学还原[J]. 催化学报, 2026, 86(7): 265-276.
[3]	王超, 冯坤, 唐梁书语, 章伍军, 周沐宇, 李佳璐, 邵天雨, 沈炎宾, 钟俊, 苏韧. 水系电催化氨氧化反应中MOFs活性位点的原位演变[J]. 催化学报, 2026, 86(7): 171-180.
[4]	王德志, 杨松华, 杨刘熠懿, 彭需发, 刘芳洋, 费浩, 吴壮志. 高效电催化固氮: 基于轨道耦合差异化响应解耦竞争反应[J]. 催化学报, 2026, 86(7): 181-190.
[5]	Jianwei Jiang, Minji Kang, Jeongcheol Shin, Kiyoung Park, Sungho Yoon. 具有磁性回收性能的钴纳米颗粒催化剂用于高选择性高性能环氧化合物羰基化制备β-内酯[J]. 催化学报, 2026, 86(7): 89-98.
[6]	刘小虎, 李守杰, 毛佳宁, 陈奥辉, 董笑, 韦懿恒, 夏嘉雨, 朱桓毅, 王晓童, 徐子然, 李桂花, 宋艳芳, 魏伟, 陈为. 透散电极原位重构AgZn₃用于安培级CO₂电还原[J]. 催化学报, 2026, 86(7): 201-211.
[7]	谢浩东, 佛雨萌, 张宏伟, 徐华, 张逍, 郭盈铄, 李润泽, 张若霖, 刘贵林, 贾希成, 李家州, 张玉明, 荆湄赞, 宋卫余, 罗文豪, 吴志杰. Sn-MFI沸石负载PtIn合金催化剂高效催化甘油氧化制乳酸[J]. 催化学报, 2026, 86(7): 99-111.
[8]	马明宇, 刘棕阳, 袁阔, 刘哲源, 王嘉新, 林清清, 钟地长, 鲁统部. 自光敏金属配合物用于光催化析氢[J]. 催化学报, 2026, 86(7): 375-383.
[9]	张权, 马鹤津, 韩若冰, 杨统林, 陈真会, 祝淼洋, 时佳维, 蔡卫卫, 杨方麒, 杨泽惠. 镧掺杂诱导晶格膨胀NiSe催化剂用于高效尿素氧化辅助电解水制氢[J]. 催化学报, 2026, 86(7): 254-264.
[10]	李晗溪, 罗振东, 薛强, 支云飞, 杜骏, 周旭凯. 基于Povarov环化的共价有机框架孔道与电荷动力学调控及其光催化产氢增强[J]. 催化学报, 2026, 86(7): 363-374.
[11]	张淑敏, 许第发, 朱文君. 设计具有选择性氧反应活性的光催化剂用于太阳能驱动的甲烷偶联[J]. 催化学报, 2026, 86(7): 5-8.
[12]	刘晓洁, 余治甫, 李奇, 王阳, 毕鑫泽, 霍凯旋, 李丁尧, 苑志昂, 闫怡帆, 李士斌, 鲁宜武, 刘强, 王文行, 吴明铂. 铁基催化剂热催化CO₂加氢制乙醇: 水管理和铁基碳化物/氧化物比例的关键作用[J]. 催化学报, 2026, 86(7): 112-124.
[13]	余旭, 田汉, 于子怡, 孔繁涛, 王敏, 申如香, 崔香枝, 施剑林. WO_2.72调控的Ru团簇增强双位点吸附用于高效抗CO阴离子交换膜燃料电池[J]. 催化学报, 2026, 86(7): 302-314.
[14]	高华, 朱勇, 温志兵, 赵冉, 陈治, 王思瑶, 何双霖, 彭况, 唐逸文, 孙立成, 李斐. 酞菁铁纳米片在染料敏化光催化体系中实现高效、高选择性CO₂转化[J]. 催化学报, 2026, 86(7): 350-362.
[15]	曹晨, 崔诗锐, 石峰, 李彦琴, 赵春阳, 胡伟, 李泽龙, 唐瑜. 镧介导的铱单原子分散及酸性析氧反应中的动态氧补充[J]. 催化学报, 2026, 86(7): 236-243.