异质结光催化剂选择性光氧化甲烷为C1含氧化合物

doi:10.1016/S1872-2067(24)60136-1

催化学报 ›› 2024, Vol. 67: 61-70.DOI: 10.1016/S1872-2067(24)60136-1

异质结光催化剂选择性光氧化甲烷为C1含氧化合物

龚汉涛^a^,^b, 邓才豪^a^,^b, 何佩佩^a^,^b, 刘明杰^a^,^b, 蔡翼亮^a^,^b, 杨亦文^a^,^b, 杨启炜^a^,^b, 鲍宗必^a^,^b, 任其龙^a^,^b, 姚思宇^a^,^b(), 张治国^a^,^b()

^a浙江大学化学与生物工程学院, 生物质化工教育部重点实验室, 浙江杭州 310058
^b浙江大学衢州研究院, 浙江衢州 324000

收稿日期:2024-07-07 接受日期:2024-09-06 出版日期:2024-11-30 发布日期:2024-11-30
通讯作者: 姚思宇,张治国
基金资助:
国家自然科学基金(22208290);国家自然科学基金(22288102);国家自然科学基金(22078288);国家自然科学基金(22225802);浙江省重点研发计划(2021C03005)

Selective photooxidation of methane to C1 oxygenates by constructing heterojunction photocatalyst with mild oxidation ability

Hantao Gong^a^,^b, Caihao Deng^a^,^b, Peipei He^a^,^b, Mingjie Liu^a^,^b, Yiliang Cai^a^,^b, Yiwen Yang^a^,^b, Qiwei Yang^a^,^b, Zongbi Bao^a^,^b, Qilong Ren^a^,^b, Siyu Yao^a^,^b(), Zhiguo Zhang^a^,^b()

^aKey Laboratory of Biomass Chemical Engineering of Ministry of Education, College of Chemical and Biological Engineering, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou 310058, Zhejiang, China
^bInstitute of Zhejiang University-Quzhou, Quzhou 324000, Zhejiang, China

Received:2024-07-07 Accepted:2024-09-06 Online:2024-11-30 Published:2024-11-30
Contact: Siyu Yao, Zhiguo Zhang
Supported by:
National Natural Science Foundation of China(22208290);National Natural Science Foundation of China(22288102);National Natural Science Foundation of China(22078288);National Natural Science Foundation of China(22225802);key R&D Program Projects in Zhejiang Province(2021C03005)

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

甲烷作为天然气等含碳资源的关键组分, 除用作燃料外, 将其直接催化转化为高附加值产物(如甲醇和甲基过氧化氢等), 对实现甲烷的高效利用意义重大, 在可持续化学工业中具有重要意义. 然而, 甲烷C‒H键具有高达439 kJ mol^‒1的解离能, 这使得转化条件极为苛刻, 通常需在高温或强酸性环境下进行活化. 光催化半导体材料被广泛应用于在温和条件下甲烷转化, 但较宽的带隙和过正的氧化电位, 易导致氧化产物过度氧化, 从而使产物选择性较低. 鉴于此, 迫切需要开发一种能在温和条件下实现甲烷活化并有效抑制产物过氧化的方法.

本文通过构建异质结催化剂, 有效抑制了甲烷氧化产物的过氧化, 为光催化甲烷选择性氧化催化剂的设计提供了新思路. 通过组合两种半导体构建异质结是光催化领域的常见策略之一, 不但能够防止单个光催化剂中光生载流子的复合, 还可调节复合材料的氧化还原电位. 针对ZnO过正的价带电位, 以ZnO和AgX(AgBr, AgCl, AgI, Ag₂WO₄, Ag₂MoO₄和Ag₃PO₄)为基础, 设计构建了一系列异质结催化剂, 期望降低ZnO空穴的较强氧化性, 进而抑制甲烷氧化产物的过度氧化. 实验结果表明, 构建的Ag-AgBr/ZnO光催化剂在甲烷选择性氧化反应中表现出较好的催化性能, 在室温下光催化甲烷氧化获得了1499.6 μmol g_cat^‒1 h^‒1的产物产率, 初级氧化产物选择性高达77.9%, 远高于Ag/ZnO和其他Ag-AgX/ZnO催化剂. 能带结构表征结果表明, Ag-AgBr/ZnO催化剂中ZnO和AgBr间构成了II型异质结, 其中ZnO价带中的光生空穴能够转移至AgBr, 而AgBr导带中的光生电子则流向ZnO, 说明该异质结的形成有利于载流子的迁移和分离. 荧光发射光谱中较低的荧光发射峰以及瞬态光电流中更强的光电流强度, 也证明了Ag-AgBr/ZnO相较于Ag/ZnO具有更强的光生载流子分离和迁移能力, 这也是甲烷氧化产物产率得以提升的原因所在. 值得注意的是, AgBr的价带(1.60 eV)比•OH/H₂O的氧化电势(2.30 eV)更负, 这表明Ag-AgBr/ZnO无法将H₂O氧化为•OH. 因此, Ag-AgBr/ZnO能够抑制初级产物被光生空穴或•OH过度氧化. 其他Ag-AgX/ZnO催化剂由于未能形成合适的II型异质结, 无法降低价带空穴的氧化能力, 故而初级氧化产物选择性较差. 在Ag-AgI/ZnO中, AgI和ZnO形成了I型异质结, 虽降低了空穴的氧化性, 提高了初级氧化产物的选择性, 但却不能实现电子空穴的有效分离, 使得产物产率较低. 此外, 电子顺磁共振光谱结果表明, 相对于Ag/ZnO, Ag-AgBr/ZnO抑制了反应中•OH自由基的生成, 提高了•OOH自由基的选择性, 从而提升了•OOH与•CH₃偶联生成CH₃OOH的选择性. 原位傅里叶变换红外光谱结果表明, Ag-AgBr/ZnO上过氧化中间体*CO₂强度较Ag/ZnO明显减弱, 说明AgBr的引入有效抑制了产物的过度氧化. 本文通过构建具有不同异质结构的光催化剂并对比甲烷氧化性能, 揭示了只有构建与甲烷活化电位相匹配的II型异质结构, 同时促进电子空穴的分离并控制价带空穴的氧化能力, 才能实现甲烷高效、高选择性氧化成初级含氧产物.

综上, 高效高选择性光催化剂的设计仍是甲烷选择性转化的重要研究方向. 本文为构建合适的异质结催化剂以实现甲烷高选择性转化为高值含氧化合物提供参考.

关键词: 甲烷选择性氧化, 光催化, 异质结, Ag-AgBr/ZnO催化剂

Abstract:

Selective photocatalytic aerobic oxidation of methane to value-added chemicals offers a promising pathway for sustainable chemical industry, yet remains a huge challenge owing to the consecutive overoxidation of primary products. Here, a type II heterojunction were constructed in Ag-AgBr/ZnO to reduce the oxidation potential of stimulated holes and prevent the undesirable CH₄ overoxidation side reactions. For photocatalytic oxidation of methane under ambient temperature, the products yield of 1499.6 μmol g_cat^-1 h^-1 with a primary products selectivity of 77.9% was achieved over Ag-AgBr/ZnO, which demonstrate remarkable improvement compared to Ag/ZnO (1089.9 μmol g_cat^-1 h^-1, 40.1%). The superior activity and selectivity result from the promoted charge separation and the redox potential matching with methane activation after introducing AgBr species. Mechanism investigation elucidated that the photo-generated holes transferred from the valence band of ZnO to that of AgBr, which prevent H₂O oxidation and enhance the selective generation of •OOH radical.

Key words: Selective methane oxidation, Photocatalysis, Heterojunction, Ag-AgBr/ZnO catalyst

龚汉涛, 邓才豪, 何佩佩, 刘明杰, 蔡翼亮, 杨亦文, 杨启炜, 鲍宗必, 任其龙, 姚思宇, 张治国. 异质结光催化剂选择性光氧化甲烷为C1含氧化合物[J]. 催化学报, 2024, 67: 61-70.

Hantao Gong, Caihao Deng, Peipei He, Mingjie Liu, Yiliang Cai, Yiwen Yang, Qiwei Yang, Zongbi Bao, Qilong Ren, Siyu Yao, Zhiguo Zhang. Selective photooxidation of methane to C1 oxygenates by constructing heterojunction photocatalyst with mild oxidation ability[J]. Chinese Journal of Catalysis, 2024, 67: 61-70.

×
扫码分享

导出引用管理器 EndNote|Ris|BibTeX

链接本文: https://www.cjcatal.com/CN/10.1016/S1872-2067(24)60136-1

https://www.cjcatal.com/CN/Y2024/V67/I12/61

图/表 5

Fig. 1. Performances evaluation of selective photocatalytic oxidation of methane. (a) catalytic performances of ZnO, Ag/ZnO and a series of Ag-X/ZnO catalysts (AgX = AgCl, AgBr AgI, Ag2WO4, Ag2MoO4, Ag3PO4). (b) Influence of Ag loadings on the photocatalytic methane oxidation reaction over Ag-AgBr/ZnO catalysts. (c) Influence of light source on the photocatalytic methane oxidation reaction.

Fig. 2. (a) XRD spectra of Ag/ZnO and Ag-AgBr/ZnO with different loadings. (b) UV-vis DRS spectra of ZnO, Ag/ZnO and Ag-AgBr/ZnO. HR-TEM (c,d), HADDF (e) and EDX mapping images (f) of Ag-AgBr/ZnO.

Fig. 3. (a) PL spectra of ZnO, Ag/ZnO and Ag-AgBr/ZnO. (b) Photocurrent measurement with ZnO, Ag/ZnO and Ag-AgBr/ZnO as catalysts under light irradiation. Transformed Kubelka-Munk function (c) and XPS valence spectra (d) of AgBr and ZnO. (e) Band structure of ZnO, AgBr, AgCl, AgI, Ag2WO4, Ag2MoO4 and Ag3PO4 catalysts determined by XPS valence spectra and Mott-Schottky plots.

Fig. 4. (a) EPR spectra of ZnO, Ag/ZnO and Ag-AgBr/ZnO under light irradiation for 5 min under O2 dissolved in methanol (left) and O2 dissolved in water (right). DMPO was added to the solution as the radical trapping agent. (b) Intensity of double integral of DMPO-OOH and DMPO-OH in EPR spectra. (c) Product yields after adding scavengers in reaction system for trapping h+, e-, •OH and •OOH, respectively. (d) HCHO yield of photocatalytic oxidation of methanol over Ag/ZnO and Ag-AgBr/ZnO catalysts (10 mg catalyst, 10 mL water, 0.2 μmol CH3OH, 25 ± 3 °C reaction temperature, light source: 300 W Xe lamp (300-1100 nm, light intensity 200 mW cm−2)). In situ DRIFTS spectra for CH4 photooxidation over Ag/ZnO (e) and Ag-AgBr/ZnO (f) during light irradiation time from 1 to 30 min.

Fig. 5. Proposed catalytic mechanism of photocatalytic methane conversion over Ag-AgBr/ZnO.

参考文献

[1]	Q. Li, Y. Ouyang, H. Li, L. Wang, J. Zeng, Angew. Chem. Int. Ed., 2022, 61, e202108069.
[2]	X. Li, C. Wang, J. Tang, Nat. Rev. Mater., 2022, 7, 617-632.
[3]	M. S. A. Sher Shah, C. Oh, H. Park, Y. J. Hwang, M. Ma, J. H. Park, Adv. Sci., 2020, 7, 2001946.
[4]	Z. Liu, B. Xu, Y.-J. Jiang, Y. Zhou, X. Sun, Y. Wang, W. Zhu, ACS Environ. Au, 2023, 3, 252-276.
[5]	Z. Xiao, J. Shen, J. Zhang, D. Li, Y. Li, X. Wang, Z. Zhang, J. Catal., 2022, 413, 20-30.
[6]	C. Xiong, Y. Liang, X. Zhou, C. Xue, H. Ji, Fuel, 2023, 332, 126172.
[7]	A. S. Sharma, V. S. Sharma, H. Kaur, R. S. Varma, Green Chem., 2020, 22, 5902-5936.
[8]	E. Okuyama, K. Umeyama, Y. Saito, M. Yamazaki, M. Satake, Chem. Pharm. Bull., 1993, 41, 1309-1311.
[9]	Y. Liu, L. Wang, F.-S. Xiao, Chem. Res. Chin. Univ., 2022, 38, 671-676.
[10]	H. Song, X. Meng, Z.-J. Wang, H. Liu, J. Ye, Joule, 2019, 3, 1606-1636.
[11]	Y. Jiang, Y. Fan, S. Li, Z. Tang, CCS Chem., 2023, 5, 30-54.
[12]	K. Zheng, Y. Wu, Z. Hu, X. Jiao, L. Li, Y. Zhao, S. Wang, S. Zhu, W. Liu, W. Yan, Y. Sun, Y. Xie, Nano Lett., 2021, 21, 10368-10376.
[13]	X. Cao, T. Han, Q. Peng, C. Chen, Y. Li, Chem. Commun., 2020, 56, 13918-13932.
[14]	B. Wang, S. Albarracín-Suazo, Y. Pagán-Torres, E. Nikolla, Catal. Today, 2017, 285, 147-158.
[15]	A. Riaz, G. Zahedi, J. J. Klemeš J. Cleaner Prod., 2013, 57, 19-37.
[16]	L. Fu, R. Zhang, J. Yang, J. Shi, H. Y. Jiang, J. Tang, Adv. Energy Mater., 2023, 13, 2301118.
[17]	S. V. L. Mahlaba, N. Hytoolakhan Lal Mahomed, A. Govender, J. Guo, G. M. Leteba, P. L. Cilliers, E. van Steen, Angew. Chem. Int. Ed., 2022, 61, e202206841.
[18]	H. Fujisaki, T. Ishizuka, H. Kotani, Y. Shiota, K. Yoshizawa, T. Kojima, Nature, 2023, 616, 476-481.
[19]	J. Xie, R. Jin, A. Li, Y. Bi, Q. Ruan, Y. Deng, Y. Zhang, S. Yao, G. Sankar, D. Ma, J. Tang, Nat. Catal., 2018, 1, 889-896.
[20]	T. Jia, W. Wang, L. Zhang, D. Zeng, J. Wang, W. Wang, Appl. Catal. B, 2024, 340, 123168.
[21]	F. Gu, X. Qin, L. Pang, R. Zhang, M. Peng, Y. Xu, S. Hong, J. Xie, M. Wang, D. Han, D. Xiao, G. Guo, X. Wang, Z. Wang, D. Ma, ACS Catal., 2023, 13, 9509-9514.
[22]	C. Bo, J. Liu, Y. Zhang, H. Chang, X. Zhang, X. Liu, C. Chen, L. Piao, Nano Today, 2023, 52, 101938.
[23]	Y. Jiang, S. Li, X. Fan, Z. Tang, Nano Res., 2023, 16, 12558-12571.
[24]	L. Xiong, J. Tang, Adv. Energy Mater., 2021, 11, 2003216.
[25]	L. Buzzetti, G. E. M. Crisenza, P. Melchiorre, Angew. Chem. Int. Ed., 2019, 58, 3730-3747.
[26]	S. Wu, L. Wang, J. Zhang, J. Photochem. Photobiol. C, 2021, 46, 100400.
[27]	Q. Zhou, X. Tan, X. Wang, Q. Zhang, C. Qi, H. Yang, Z. He, T. Xing, M. Wang, M. Wu, W. Wu, ACS Catal., 2024, 14, 955-964.
[28]	W. Zhou, X. Qiu, Y. Jiang, Y. Fan, S. Wei, D. Han, L. Niu, Z. Tang, J. Mater. Chem. A, 2020, 8, 13277-13284.
[29]	L. Luo, Z. Gong, Y. Xu, J. Ma, H. Liu, J. Xing, J. Tang, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2021, 144, 740-750.
[30]	S. Zhu, X. Li, Z. Pan, X. Jiao, K. Zheng, L. Li, W. Shao, X. Zu, J. Hu, J. Zhu, Y. Sun, Y. Xie, Nano Lett., 2021, 21, 4122-4128.
[31]	X. Chen, Y. Li, X. Pan, D. Cortie, X. Huang, Z. Yi, Nat. Commun., 2016, 7, 12273.
[32]	X. Wu, Q. Zhang, W. Li, B. Qiao, D. Ma, S. L. Wang, ACS Catal., 2021, 11, 14038-14046.
[33]	H. Song, H. Huang, X. Meng, Q. Wang, H. Hu, S. Wang, H. Zhang, W. Jewasuwan, N. Fukata, N. Feng, J. Ye, Angew. Chem. Int. Ed., 2022, 62, e202215057.
[34]	X. Cai, S. Fang, Y. H. Hu, J. Mater. Chem. A, 2021, 9, 10796-10802.
[35]	C. Bo, L. Zhang, X. Liu, H. Chang, Y. Sun, X. Zhang, T. Tan, L. Piao, Nano Res., 2023, 17, 2473-2480.
[36]	Y. Sun, C. Bo, Z. Cheng, X. Zhang, J. Liu, L. Piao, Nano Res., 2023, 16, 12942-12948.
[37]	X. Wu, Y. Zeng, H. Liu, J. Zhao, T. Zhang, S. L. Wang, Nano Res., 2021, 14, 4584-4590.
[38]	K. Villa, S. Murcia-López, T. Andreu, J. R. Morante, Appl. Catal. B, 2015, 163, 150-155.
[39]	K. Villa, S. Murcia-López, J. R. Morante, T. Andreu, Appl. Catal. B, 2016, 187, 30-36.
[40]	L. Luo, X. Han, K. Wang, Y. Xu, L. Xiong, J. Ma, Z. Guo, J. Tang, Nat. Commun., 2023, 14, 2690.
[41]	Y. Jiang, S. Li, S. Wang, Y. Zhang, C. Long, J. Xie, X. Fan, W. Zhao, P. Xu, Y. Fan, C. Cui, Z. Tang, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2023, 145, 2698-2707.
[42]	Q. Zhou, X. Wang, T. Xing, M. Wang, M. Wu, W. Wu, J. Catal., 2024, 429, 115289.
[43]	L. Luo, L. Fu, H. Liu, Y. Xu, J. Xing, C.-R. Chang, D.-Y. Yang, J. Tang, Nat. Commun., 2022, 13, 2930.
[44]	M. Huang, S. Zhang, B. Wu, X. Yu, Y. Gan, T. Lin, F. Yu, Y. Sun, L. Zhong, ChemSusChem, 2022, 15, e202200548.
[45]	N. Feng, H. Lin, H. Song, L. Yang, D. Tang, F. Deng, J. Ye, Nat. Commun., 2021, 12, 4652.
[46]	S. Wei, X. Zhu, P. Zhang, Y. Fan, Z. Sun, X. Zhao, D. Han, L. Niu, Appl. Catal. B, 2021, 283, 119661.
[47]	H. Song, X. Meng, S. Wang, W. Zhou, X. Wang, T. Kako, J. Ye, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2019, 141, 20507-20515.
[48]	C. Wang, X. Li, Y. Ren, H. Jiao, F. R. Wang, J. Tang, ACS Catal., 2023, 13, 3768-3774.
[49]	H. Song, X. Meng, S. Wang, W. Zhou, S. Song, T. Kako, J. Ye, ACS Catal., 2020, 10, 14318-14326.
[50]	Y. Liu, R. Wang, C. K. Russell, P. Jia, Y. Yao, W. Huang, M. Radosz, K. A. M. Gasem, H. Adidharma, M. Fan, Coord. Chem. Rev., 2022, 470, 214691.
[51]	L. Zhang, J. Zhang, H. Yu, J. Yu, Adv. Mater., 2022, 34, 2107668.
[52]	J. Zhai, B. Zhou, H. Wu, S. Jia, M. Chu, S. Han, W. Xia, M. He, B. Han, Chem. Sci., 2022, 13, 4616-4622.
[53]	S. Stoll, A. Schweiger, J. Magn. Resonance, 2006, 178, 42-55.
[54]	Y. Zhu, R. Zhu, L. Yan, H. Fu, Y. Xi, H. Zhou, G. Zhu, J. Zhu, H. He, Appl. Catal. B, 2018, 239, 280-289.
[55]	B. Yu, L. Cheng, S. Dai, Y. Jiang, B. Yang, H. Li, Y. Zhao, J. Xu, Y. Zhang, C. Pan, X. M. Cao, Y. Zhu, Y. Lou, Adv. Sci., 2023, 10, 2302143.
[56]	Q. Zhou, X. Wang, X. Tan, Q. Zhang, H. Yang, T. Xing, M. Wang, M. Wu, W. Wu, Nano Res., 2023, 10.1007/s12274-023-6323-5.
[57]	Q. Ahsanulhaq, A. Umar, Y. B. Hahn, Nanotechnology, 2007, 18, 115603.
[58]	L. Dai, X. L. Chen, W. J. Wang, T. Zhou, B. Q. Hu, J. Phys.-Condes. Matter, 2003, 15, 2221-2226.
[59]	Y. Xu, D. Wu, Q. Zhang, P. Rao, P. Deng, M. Tang, J. Li, Y. Hua, C. Wang, S. Zhong, C. Jia, Z. Liu, Y. Shen, L. Gu, X. Tian, Q. Liu, Nat. Commun., 2024, 15, 564.
[60]	Y. Cao, W. Yu, C. Han, Y. Yang, Z. Rao, R. Guo, F. Dong, R. Zhang, Y. Zhou, Angew. Chem. Int. Ed., 2023, 62, e202302196.
[61]	Z. Zhang, J. Zhang, Y. Zhu, Z. An, X. Shu, H. Song, W. Wang, Z. Chai, C. Shang, S. Jiang, Y. Jing, L. Zheng, J. He, Chem. Catal., 2022, 2, 1440-1449.
[62]	C. Han, Y. Cao, W. Yu, Z. Huang, F. Dong, L. Ye, S. Yu, Y. Zhou, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2023, 145, 8609-8620.
[63]	H. Du, X. Li, Z. Cao, S. Zhang, W. Yu, F. Sun, S. Wang, J. Zhao, J. Wang, Y. Bai, J. Yang, P. Yang, B. Jiang, H. Li, Appl. Catal. B, 2023, 324, 122291.

异质结光催化剂选择性光氧化甲烷为C1含氧化合物

Selective photooxidation of methane to C1 oxygenates by constructing heterojunction photocatalyst with mild oxidation ability

RichHTML

PDF

Supporting Information

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

扫码分享

图/表 5

参考文献

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

[1]	毛思航, 赫荣安, 宋少青. S型异质结界面超快电子转移促进人工光合成[J]. 催化学报, 2024, 64(9): 1-3.
[2]	付辉, 田金, 张倩倩, 郑昭科, 程合峰, 刘媛媛, 黄柏标, 王朋. 钴单原子修饰的石墨烯助催化剂用于提高卤化物钙钛矿光催化CO₂还原活性[J]. 催化学报, 2024, 64(9): 143-151.
[3]	刘方璇, 孙彬, 刘子妍, 魏英勤, 高婷婷, 周国伟. 空位工程调控中空结构ZnO/ZnS S型异质结用于高效光催化产氢[J]. 催化学报, 2024, 64(9): 152-165.
[4]	林铮, 谢婉婷, 朱梦静, 汪长春, 郭佳. 二氧化硅支撑的平行堆叠排列手性共价有机框架促进光催化析氢[J]. 催化学报, 2024, 64(9): 87-97.
[5]	陈春光, 张金锋, 褚海亮, 孙立贤, Graham Dawson, 代凯. 硫族化物基S型异质结光催化剂[J]. 催化学报, 2024, 63(8): 81-108.
[6]	赵艳艳, 杨春燕, 张淑敏, 孙国太, 朱必成, 王临曦, 张建军. 飞秒瞬态吸收光谱研究ZnSe QDs/COF S型异质结光催化产H₂O₂中载流子传输机理[J]. 催化学报, 2024, 63(8): 258-269.
[7]	王福林, 李祥伟, 卢康强, 周漫, 余长林, 杨凯. S型CuInS₂@CoS₂异质结促进电荷转移以实现高效光催化CO₂还原[J]. 催化学报, 2024, 63(8): 190-201.
[8]	王金龙, 刘东妮, 李铭洋, 谷骁一, 吴仕群, 张金龙. 通过金属空位工程促进CO₂光还原[J]. 催化学报, 2024, 63(8): 202-212.
[9]	张棋祺, 苗慧, 王俊, 孙涛, 刘恩周. In_2.77S₄/K⁺掺杂g-C₃N₄自组装S型异质结光催化H₂O和O₂合成H₂O₂[J]. 催化学报, 2024, 63(8): 176-189.
[10]	厉超, 王朔, 刘媛, 黄细河, 庄严, 吴舒鸿, 汪颖, 温娜, 吴凯丰, 丁正新, 龙金林. 共价有机框架双电场叠加实现高效光催化产氢[J]. 催化学报, 2024, 63(8): 164-175.
[11]	陈昕煜, 赵聪聪, 任静, 李波, 刘倩倩, 李葳, 杨帆, 陆思琦, 赵宇飞, 颜力楷, 臧宏瑛. 富含氧空位的由多金属氧簇辅助的银基异质结用于高效电催化固氮[J]. 催化学报, 2024, 62(7): 209-218.
[12]	任卫杰, 李宁, 常青, 武杰, 杨金龙, 胡胜亮, 康振辉. 通过碳点从共价三嗪框架中提取光生空穴用于光合作用产过氧化氢[J]. 催化学报, 2024, 62(7): 178-189.
[13]	陈晓, 杜云梅, 杨宇, 刘康, 赵晋灵, 夏晓丹, 王磊. 安培级电流密度下淬火优化CoPS纳米棒的晶型/非晶型比例以促进肼辅助的全水分解[J]. 催化学报, 2024, 62(7): 265-276.
[14]	赵万成, 马加朋, 田栋, 康宝涛, 夏方诠, 成婧, 吴亚军, 王梦遥, 武刚. 集成有CNTs和Ni-Ni(OH)₂异质结构的电解析氢自支撑薄膜催化剂[J]. 催化学报, 2024, 62(7): 287-295.
[15]	梁腾, 李雨彤, 徐帅, 姚宇欣, 许荣萍, 边辑, 张紫晴, 井立强. 电荷迁移方向调控的BiVO₄量子点/苝四羧酸Z型异质结与纳米金修饰在人工光合成H₂O₂中的协同作用[J]. 催化学报, 2024, 62(7): 277-286.