Insight into MgO promoter with low concentration for the carbon-deposition resistance of Ni-based catalysts in the CO2 reforming of CH4

doi:10.1016/S1872-2067(17)62928-0

Chinese Journal of Catalysis ›› 2018, Vol. 39 ›› Issue (1): 88-98.DOI: 10.1016/S1872-2067(17)62928-0

• Articles • Previous Articles Next Articles

Insight into MgO promoter with low concentration for the carbon-deposition resistance of Ni-based catalysts in the CO₂ reforming of CH₄

Xiangdong Feng^a,b, Jie Feng^a,b, Wenying Li^a,b

a Key Laboratory of Coal Science and Technology, Taiyuan University of Technology, Taiyuan 030024, Shanxi, China;
b Training Base of State Key Laboratory of Coal Science and Technology Jointly Constructed by Shanxi Province and Ministry of Science and Technology, Taiyuan University of Technology, Taiyuan 030024, Shanxi, China

Received:2017-07-05 Revised:2017-09-17 Online:2018-01-18 Published:2018-01-19
Contact: 10.1016/S1872-2067(17)62928-0
Supported by:
This work was supported by the National Natural Science Fundation of China (U1361202, 51276120).

Abstract

Abstract:

The CO₂ reforming of CH₄ is studied over MgO-promoted Ni catalysts, which were supported on alumina prepared from hydrotalcite. This presents an improved stability compared with non-promoted catalysts. The introduction of the MgO promoter was achieved through the "memory effect" of the Ni-Al hydrotalcite structure, and ICP-MS confirmed that only 0.42 wt.% of Mg²⁺ ions were added into the Ni-Mg/Al catalyst. Although no differences in the Ni particle size and basicity strength were observed, the Ni-Mg/Al catalyst showed a higher catalytic stability than the Ni/Al catalyst. A series of surface reaction experiments were used and showed that the addition of a MgO promoter with low concentration can promote CO₂ dissociation to form active surface oxygen arising from the formation of the Ni-MgO interface sites. Therefore, the carbon-resistance promotion by nature was suggested to contribute to an oxidative environment around Ni particles, which would increase the conversion of carbon residues from CH₄ cracking to yield CO on the Ni metal surface.

Key words: CO₂ reforming of CH₄, Carbon-deposition resistant, Activation of CO₂, Ni-based catalyst, Low concentration MgO promoter

Xiangdong Feng, Jie Feng, Wenying Li. Insight into MgO promoter with low concentration for the carbon-deposition resistance of Ni-based catalysts in the CO₂ reforming of CH₄[J]. Chinese Journal of Catalysis, 2018, 39(1): 88-98.

×
share this article

Add to citation manager EndNote|Ris|BibTeX

URL: https://www.cjcatal.com/EN/10.1016/S1872-2067(17)62928-0

https://www.cjcatal.com/EN/Y2018/V39/I1/88

References

[1] L. Li, N. Zhao, W. Wei, Y. H. Sun, Fuel, 2013, 108, 112-130.
[2] W. Wang, S. P. Wang, X. B. Ma, J. L. Gong, Chem. Soc. Rev., 2011, 40, 3703-3727.
[3] Q. H. Zhu, H. W. Cheng, X. L. Zou, X. G. Lu, Q. Xu, Z. F. Zhou, Chin. J. Catal., 2015, 36, 915-924.
[4] D. L. Li, Y. Nakagawa, K. Tomishige, Appl. Catal. A, 2011, 408, 1-24.
[5] A. P. E. York, T. C. Xiao, M. L. H. Green, J. B. Claridge, Catal. Rev. Sci. Eng., 2007, 49, 511-560.
[6] L. P. Qian, W. J. Cai, L. Zhang, L. Ye, J. Li, M. Tang, B. Yue, H. Y. He, Appl. Catal. B, 2015, 164, 168-175.
[7] B. Bachiller-Baeza, C. Mateos-Pedrero, M. A. Soria, A. Guerrero-Ruiz, U. Rodemerck, I. Rodríguez-Ramos, Appl. Catal. B, 2013, 129, 450-459.
[8] Y. P. Guo, W. Y. Li, J. Feng, Surf. Sci., 2017, 660, 22-30.
[9] Y. Kathiraser, U. Oemar, E. T. Saw, Z. W. Li, S. Kawi, Chem. Eng. J., 2015, 278, 62-78.
[10] J. M. Wei, E. Iglesia, J. Catal., 2004, 224, 370-383.
[11] Y. H. Cui, H. Y. Xu, Q. J. Ge, W. Z. Li, J. Mol. Catal. A, 2006, 243, 226-232.
[12] Y. H. Cui, H. D. Zhang, H. Y. Xu, W. Z. Li, Appl. Catal. A, 2007, 318, 79-88.
[13] Y. A. Zhu, D. Chen, X. G. Zhou, W. K. Yuan, Catal. Today, 2009, 148, 260-267.
[14] V.A. Tsipouriari, X.E. Verykios, Catal. Today, 2001, 64, 83-90.
[15] M. C. J. Bradford, M. A. Vannice, Appl. Catal. A, 1996, 142, 73-96.
[16] H. Özdemir, M. A. Faruk. Öksüzömer, M. Ali. Gürkaynak, Int. J. Hydrogen Energy, 2010, 35, 12147-12160.
[17] X. D. Feng, J. Feng, W. Y. Li, Int. J. Hydrogen Energy, 2017, 42, 3036-3042.
[18] W. Z. Li, Z. K. Zhao, Y. H. Jiao, G. R. Wang, Chin. J. Catal., 2016, 37, 2122-2133.
[19] J. Feng, Y. J. Ding, Y. P. Guo, X. Y. Li, W. Y. Li, Fuel, 2013, 109, 110-115.
[20] L. L. Xu, H. H. Zhao, H. L. Song, L. J. Chou, Int. J. Hydrogen Energy, 2012, 37, 7497-7511.
[21] M. J. Yu, K. K. Zhu, Z. C. Liu, H. P. Xiao, W. Deng, X. G. Zhou, Appl. Catal. B, 2014, 148-149, 177-190.
[22] V. García, J. J. Fernández, W. Ruíz, F. Mondragón, A. Moreno, Catal. Commun., 2009, 11, 240-246.
[23] I. H. Son, S. J. Lee, H. S. Roh, Int. J. Hydrogen Energy, 2014, 39, 3762-3770.
[24] M. Usman, W. M. A. Wan. Daud, H. F. Abbas, Renew. Sust. Energy Rev., 2015, 45, 710-744.
[25] A. E. Castro. Luna, M. E. Iriarte, Appl. Catal. A, 2008, 343, 10-15.
[26] Z. Y. Hou, O. Yokota, T. Tanaka, T. Yashima, Appl. Catal. A, 2003, 253, 381-387.
[27] G. Fornasari, M. Gazzano, D. Matteuzzi, F. Trifirò, A. Vaccari, Appl. Clay Sci., 1995, 10, 69-82.
[28] F. Cavani, F. Trifiro, A. Vaccari, Catal. Today, 1991, 11, 173-301.
[29] K. Takehira, T. Kawabata, T. Shishido, K. Murakami, T. Ohi, D. Shoro, M. Honda, K. Takaki, J. Catal., 2005, 231, 92-104.
[30] O. Lebedeva, D. Tichit, B. Coq, Appl. Catal. A, 1999, 183, 61-71.
[31] J. Pérez-Ramírez, G. Mul, J. A. Moulijn, Vib. Spectrosc., 2001, 27, 75-88.
[32] K. Takehira, T. Shishido, D. Shoro, K. Murakami, M. Honda, T. Kawabata, K. Takaki, Catal. Commun., 2004, 5, 209-213.
[33] H. Özdemir, M. A. F. Öksüzömer, M. A. Gürkaynak, Fuel, 2014, 116, 63-70.
[34] C. E. Daza, A. Kiennemann, S. Moreno, R. Molina, Appl. Catal. A, 2009, 364, 65-74.
[35] Y. X. Pan, C. J. Liu, L. Cui, Catal. Lett., 2008, 123, 96-101.
[36] J. Z. Guo, J. Gao, B. H. Chen, Z. Y. Hou, J. H. Fei, H. Lou, X. M. Zheng, Int. J. Hydrogen Energy, 2009, 34, 8905-8911.
[37] F. F. de. Sousa, H. S. A. de. Sousa, A. C. Oliveira, M. C. C. Junior, A. P. Ayala, E. B. Barros, B. C. Viana, J. M. Filho, A. C. Oliveira, Int. J. Hydrogen Energy, 2012, 37, 3201-3212.
[38] C. Z. Wang, N. N. Sun, N. Zhao, W. Wei, J. Zhang, T. J. Zhao, Y. H. Sun, C. G. Sun, H. Liu, C. E. Snape, ChemCatChem, 2014, 6, 640-648.
[39] Y. X. Pan, C. J. Liu, P. Shi, J. Power Sources, 2008, 176, 46-53.
[40] J. Xu, M. Saeys, J. Catal., 2006, 242, 217-226.
[41] C. Xie, Y. S. Chen, Y. Li, X. X. Wang, C. S. Song, Appl. Catal. A, 2011, 394, 32-40.
[42] A. E. Abasaeed, A. S. Al-Fatesh, M. A. Naeem, A. A. Ibrahim, A. H. Fakeeha, Int. J. Hydrogen Energy, 2015, 40, 6818-6826.
[43] J. I. Di. Cosimo, V. K. Díez, M. Xu, E. Iglesia, C. R. Apesteguía, J. Catal., 1998, 178, 499-510.
[44] G. Xu, K. Shi, Y. Gao, H. Xu, Y. Wei, J. Mol. Catal. A, 1999, 147, 47-54.
[45] S. H. Seok, S. H. Choi, E. D. Park, S. H. Han, J. S. Lee, J. Catal., 2002, 209, 6-15.
[46] A. N. J. Van. Keulen, K. Seshan, J. H. B. J. Hoebink, J. R. H. Ross, J. Catal., 1997, 166, 306-314.
[47] J. J. Guo, H. Lou, L. Y. Mo, X. M. Zheng, J. Mol. Catal. A, 2010, 316, 1-7.
[48] Y. Schuurman, C. Marquez-Alvarez, V. C. H. Kroll, C. Mirodatos, Catal. Today, 1998, 46, 185-192.
[49] M. C. J. Bradford, M. A. Vannice, Appl. Catal. A, 1996, 142, 97-122.
[50] N. N. Sun, X. Wen, F. Wang, W. C. Peng, N. Zhao, F. K. Xiao, W. Wei, Y. H. Sun, J. T. Kang, Appl. Surf. Sci., 2011, 257, 9169-9176.
[51] J. G. Zhang, H. Wang, A. K. Dalai, Appl. Catal. A, 2008, 339, 121-129.
[52] J. H. Kim, D. J. Suh, T. J. Park, K. L. Kim, Appl. Catal. A, 2000, 197, 191-200.
[53] Z. Y. Hou, J. Z. Gao, J. Z. Guo, D. Liang, H. Lou, X. M. Zheng, J. Catal., 2007, 250, 331-341.
[54] S. M. Stagg-Williams, F. B. Noronha, G. Fendley, D. E. Resasco, J. Catal., 2000, 194, 240-249.
[55] J. R. Rostrup-Nielsen, J. Catal., 1984, 85, 31-43.
[56] F. Besenbacher, I. Chorkendorff, B. S. Clausen, B. Hammer, A. M. Molenbroek, J. K. Nörskov, I. Stensgaard, Science, 1998, 279, 1913-1915.
[57] J. H. Fei, Z. Y. Hou, X. M. Zheng, T. Yashima, Catal. Lett., 2004, 98, 241-245.
[58] F. B. Noronha, E. C. Fendley, R. R. Soares, W. E. Alvarez, D. E. Resasco, Chem. Eng. J., 2001, 82, 21-31.
[59] K. Tomishige, Y. G. Chen, K. Fujimoto, J. Catal., 1999, 181, 91-103.
[60] H. Milberg, A. Juan, N. Amadeo, B. Irigoyen, J. Mol. Catal. A, 2010, 315, 171-177.

Insight into MgO promoter with low concentration for the carbon-deposition resistance of Ni-based catalysts in the CO₂ reforming of CH₄

PDF (PC)

Knowledge

Abstract

Cite this article

share this article

share this article

References

Related Articles 2

Recommended Articles

Metrics

[1]	Weizuo Li, Zhongkui Zhao, Yanhua Jiao, Guiru Wang. Morphology effect of zirconia support on the catalytic performance of supported Ni catalysts for dry reforming of methane [J]. Chinese Journal of Catalysis, 2016, 37(12): 2122-2133.
[2]	ZHAO Jiaojiao, YU Yunbo, HAN Xue, HE Hong. Fuel reforming over Ni-based catalysts coupled with selective catalytic reduction of NO_x [J]. Chinese Journal of Catalysis, 2013, 34(7): 1407-1417.