Chinese Journal of Catalysis ›› 2021, Vol. 42 ›› Issue (11): 1843-1864.DOI: 10.1016/S1872-2067(21)63833-0
• Review • Previous Articles Next Articles
Received:
2021-02-03
Revised:
2021-02-03
Accepted:
2021-04-20
Online:
2021-11-18
Published:
2021-05-18
Contact:
Bin Dong
About author:
*Tel/Fax: +86-532-86981156; E-mail: dongbin@upc.edu.cnSupported by:
Jing-Yi Xie, Bin Dong. Hollow and substrate-supported Prussian blue, its analogs, and their derivatives for green water splitting[J]. Chinese Journal of Catalysis, 2021, 42(11): 1843-1864.
Add to citation manager EndNote|Ris|BibTeX
URL: https://www.cjcatal.com/EN/10.1016/S1872-2067(21)63833-0
Fig. 1. (a) Three routes for industrial hydrogen production. Reproduced with permission from Ref. [19]. Copyright 2015, Royal Society of Chemistry; (b) Benchmarks for hydrogen- and oxygen-producing electrocatalysts for green water splitting. Reproduced with permission from Ref. [23]. Copyright 2015, American Chemical Society.
Fig. 2. Crystal structures of PB and PBAs. (a) A defect-free PB lattice. Reproduced with permission from Ref. [50]. Copyright 2012, Royal Society of Chemistry. Architectures of insoluble (b) and soluble (c) PB. Reproduced with permission from Ref. [47]. Copyright 2012, KISTI.
Advantages | Disadvantages |
---|---|
Metal centers are tunable | Physical structures are unstable and prone to collapse at high temperatures |
Secondary metallic species can be introduced to PB and PBA systems | |
Many derivatives possible, broadening the range of applications | PB and PBA particles cannot be scaled down to below 100 nm, preventing exposure of more active sites |
Morphologies are tunable | |
Electron density is tunable |
Table 1 Summary of the advantages and disadvantages of PB/PBAs.
Advantages | Disadvantages |
---|---|
Metal centers are tunable | Physical structures are unstable and prone to collapse at high temperatures |
Secondary metallic species can be introduced to PB and PBA systems | |
Many derivatives possible, broadening the range of applications | PB and PBA particles cannot be scaled down to below 100 nm, preventing exposure of more active sites |
Morphologies are tunable | |
Electron density is tunable |
Fig. 3. (a) Schematic showing different strategies for the production of single-shelled boxes of PB/PBAs. I, soft templates; II, hard templates; III, chemical etching; and IV, cation exchange. (b,c) Transmission electron microscopy (TEM) micrographs of single-shelled PB at low and high magnification (synthesized via approach I). Reproduced with permission from Ref. [39]. Copyright 2009, American Chemical Society. (d,e) TEM images of a RbMnFe PBA obtained by approach II. Reproduced with permission from Ref. [95]. Copyright 2012, American Chemical Society. (f,g) Scanning electron microscopy (SEM) and TEM images of Co-Fe PBA single-shelled boxes after etching treatment (obtained by approach III). Reproduced with permission from Ref. [96]. Copyright 2012, Wiley-VCH. (h-j) TEM images showing the transformation of a solid Mn-Fe PBA cube to Co-Fe PBA single-shelled hollow boxes (obtained via approach IV). Reproduced with permission from Ref. [97]. Copyright 2017, Elsevier.
Fig. 4. (a) Schematic of the conversion of solid cubic PB precursor particles to Fe(OH)3/WO3-x·yH2O nanocages via etching. TEM (b) and SEM (c) images of Fe-W PBA. (d-f) SEM/energy dispersive X-ray (EDS) mapping of W, Fe, and O in Fe-W PBA cubes. Reproduced with permission from Ref. [106]. Copyright 2019, Royal Society of Chemistry.
Fig. 5. (a) Formation and subsequent morphological changes of NiS nanocages with holes in the centers of the faces. (b,c) Field-emission (FE)SEM images of NiS nanoframes. (d) TEM of a NiS particle. Reproduced with permission from Ref. [87]. Copyright 2015, Wiley-VCH. FESEM images (e) of single-crystalline KCoFe nanoframes; TEM image (f), selected area electron diffraction pattern (g), and high-resolution TEM images (h) showing the morphology and structure of a single KCoFe nanoframe. Reproduced with permission from Ref. [113]. Copyright 2017, AAAS. (i) Schematic of the formation of Ni-Co PBA nanocages with corner holes; FESEM (j) and TEM (k,l) images of Ni-Co PBA; FESEM (m) and TEM (n,o) images of Ni-Co oxide derivatives. Reproduced with permission from Ref. [114]. Copyright 2016, Wiley-VCH. (p) Schematic of the formation of Co-PBA cages; SEM (q) and TEM (r,s) images of Co-PBA cages; SEM (t) and TEM (u,v) images of cobaltosic oxide nanocages. Reproduced with permission from Ref. [88]. Copyright 2016, Royal Society of Chemistry.
Fig. 6. Nanocage with corner holes. (a) Schematic of the reaction process of hierarchical multi-shelled (approach A) and multicompositional (approach B) metal-oxide microboxes prepared from metal-organic framework templates. TEM images of Fe(OH)3 microboxes prepared from 0.02 (b) and 0.2 (c) M NaOH solution at room temperature; (d) TEM images of hierarchical Fe(OH)3 microboxes having a single shell prepared in 0.2 M NaOH solution in 80 °C; (e-g) TEM images of hierarchical Fe(OH)3 microboxes having multi-shells prepared in 2-4 M NaOH solution at 80 °C. Reproduced with permission from Ref. [91]. Copyright 2016, American Chemical Society. (h,i) SEM and TEM of yolk-shell PB. Reproduced with permission from Ref. [92]. Copyright 2019, Elsevier. (j,k) High-magnification SEM and TEM images of MnFe-PBA. Reproduced with permission from Ref. [90]. Copyright 2019, Elsevier.
Fig. 7. FESEM images of PBA-coated cobaltous hydroxide on NF after growth for 20 min (a), 1 h (b), 3 h (c), and 6 h (d); (e) Changes in the pH of solutions of 30 × 10-3 M K3Fe(CN)6 and cobaltous hydroxide during deposition on a NF electrode from 0 to 11 h. Reproduced with permission from Ref. [21]. Copyright 2019, Wiley-VCH. SEM images of Cu-FePBA/CF before (f) and after (g) acid etching; (h) TEM image of hollow acid-etched Cu-FePBA/CF; SEM images of PB/Fe (i), SnFePBA/Sn (j), ZnFePBA/Zn (k), NiFePBA/NF (l) samples, and APB/Fe (m), ASnFePBA/Sn (n), AZnFePBA/Zn (o), and ANiFePBA/NF (p) samples etched with acid. Reproduced with permission from Ref. [122]. Copyright 2019, Wiley-VCH.
Fig. 9. (a) SEM image of NiFeII-PBA obtained from NF calcined at 400 °C; (b) Linear sweep voltammetry curves in 1.0 M KOH containing NiFeII-PBA annealed from 300 to 800 °C. Reproduced with permission from Ref. [151]. Copyright 2018, American Chemical Society. (c) Schematic showing the thermal decomposition of small PB cubes, small hollow PB cubes, and large hollow PB cubes. Reproduced with permission from Ref. [152]. Copyright 2012, American Chemical Society. FESEM images of PBA cubes grown on different substrates. (d) Co3O4 nanosheets; (e) Ni(OH)2 nanoparticles; (f) NiCo2(OH)x nanosheets; (g) Co(OH)F nanowires; (h) MnO2 nanosheets; (i) Cu(OH)2 nanowires. Reproduced with permission from Ref. [21]. Copyright 2019, Wiley-VCH.
Fig. 10. (a) Schematic illustration of the shape-controlled synthesis of PBAs; (b) FESEM images of Mn1.0Fe0.8Co1.2O4; (c) Linear sweep voltammetry (LSV) curves obtained during the OER using MnxFe1.8-xCo1.2O4. Reproduced with permission from Ref. [155]. Copyright 2016, Royal Society of Chemistry; (d) Schematic of the low-temperature air plasma treatment of Co-PBA; (e) OER LSV of pristine and plasma-treated Co-PBA samples under industry-compatible conditions. Reproduced with permission from Ref. [156]. Copyright 2018, Wiley-VCH.
Fig. 11. (a) Schematic of the synthesis of FeP/HCNB. (b) TEM images of FeP/HCNB. Reproduced with permission from Ref. [159]. Copyright 2019, Elsevier. (c) Schematic of the synthesis of Fe-CoP nanocages. Reproduced with permission from Ref. [160]. Copyright 2020, Elsevier. (d) Schematic of the synthesis of porous Fe-CoP/NF; (e) Controlled-current electrolysis current density traces at different current densities for Fe-CoP/NF in alkaline media; (f) LSV curves of corresponding catalysts. Reproduced with permission from Ref. [161]. Copyright 2018, Wiley-VCH.
Fig. 12. (a) Schematic of the synthesis of Ni(OH)2, NiO, and Ni-P porous nanoplates from a NiNi-PBA; (b) TEM image of Ni-P porous nanoplates; (c) LSV curves of Ni-P, Ni(OH)2 and NiO porous nanoplates in alkaline media. Reproduced with permission from Ref. [166]. Copyright 2016, Royal Society of Chemistry. (d) Schematic of the synthesis of N-doped C/Ni5P4/Fe3P hollow cubes; (e) High-resolution TEM images of N-doped C/Ni5P4/Fe3P hollow cubes; (f) LSV plots of SiO2-coated N-doped C/Ni5P4/Fe3P hollow cubes and other samples for comparison. Reproduced with permission from Ref. [167]. Copyright 2017, Royal Society of Chemistry.
Fig. 13. SEM (a) and high-resolution TEM (b) images of hollow Co3S4@MoS2 heterostructures; (c) Polarization curves of Co3S4@MoS2, MoS2, Co3S4, and RuO2 electrodes for the OER in 1.0 M KOH; (d) Polarization curves of Co3S4@MoS2, MoS2, Co3S4, and Pt/C electrodes for the HER in a 1 M KOH solution. Reproduced with permission from Ref. [181]. Copyright 2018, Elsevier. (e) Schematic display of the synthesis of (Ni,Co)Se-GA for water splitting electrocatalysis. (Ni,Co)Se2-GA decorated on Ni foam for OER (f) and HER (g) electrocatalysis in 1.0 M KOH solution, as well as (Ni,Co)Se2, GA, and RuO2 for comparison. Reproduced with permission from Ref. [183]. Copyright 2017, American Chemical Society. (h) Fabrication steps for Co9S8@NC hybrid composites; (i) LSV plots of Co9S8. Reproduced with permission from Ref. [170]. Copyright 2018, Royal Society of Chemistry.
Fig. 14. (a) Schematic of the construction of Ti-Fe mixed sulfide nanoboxes; (b) TEM images of the Ti-Fe PBA nanoboxes; LSV curves (c), and chronopotentiometry (d) of the c-Ti-Fe-S nanobox catalyst. Reproduced with permission from Ref. [184]. Copyright 2018, Royal Society of Chemistry.
Fig. 15. (a) Schematic of the fabrication of carbon-coated hollow mesoporous FeP microcubes; (b) high-resolution TEM image of carbon-coated hollow mesoporous FeP@C microcube; (c) Polarization curves of Pt/C, carbon-coated hollow mesoporous FeP microcubes, FeP nanoparticles, and carbon-coated hollow Fe3O4 microcubes in acidic media. Reproduced with permission from Ref. [191]. Copyright 2016, Royal Society of Chemistry. (d) Schematic of the preparation of Co@Co-N/rGO. (e) LSV curves for different catalysts in 1 M KOH solution. Reproduced with permission from Ref. [192]. Copyright 2019, Elsevier. (f) Schematic of the preparation of O-CNT/NiFe. Reproduced with permission from Ref. [193]. Copyright 2020, American Chemical Society.
Fig. 16. (a,b) Schematic of the preparation of hollow and bamboo-like structures at various annealing temperatures. (c) LSV plots of the encapsulated nanostructures in 0.1 M KOH. Reproduced with permission from Ref. [194]. Copyright 2016, Royal Society of Chemistry. (d,e) Schematic display of the ultrafast microwave-assisted preparation of M@NC/rGO, as well as a corresponding TEM image; (f) IR-Corrected polarization curves of FeNi@NC/RGO, FeNi/HRGO, FeNi@NC, and IrO2. Reproduced with permission from Ref. [195]. Copyright 2018, Royal Society of Chemistry.
Fig. 17. Schematic of HER (left) and OER (right) polarization curves for water electrolysis. The cathode (ηc) and anode (ηa) potentials require the same current density (j).
Fig. 19. (a) Schematic demonstration of the formation of Co-PBA/CdS (beaded structure); (b) EDS elemental mapping of Co, N, Cd, and S in Co-PBA/CdS synthesized at relatively low temperatures with 82.6 wt% Co-PBA (PB-Co/CdS-LT-3); (c,d) Photocatalytic hydrogen evolution rates and catalytic durability of PB-Co/CdS-LT-3. Reproduced with permission from Ref. [254]. Copyright 2021, American Chemical Society.
Fig. 20. (a) Schematic demonstration of two-step sulfidation for the synthesis of CdS frame-in-cage particles; TEM images of Cd-PBA cubes (b), Cd-PBA cube-in-CdS cage particles (c), and CdS frame-in-cage particles (d); (e) PHE rates of CdS cubes, CdS cages, and CdS frame-in-cage particles. Reproduced with permission from Ref. [258]. Copyright 2020, Wiley-VCH.
Catalyst | Sacrificial reagent | PHE rate (μmol h-1 g-1) | Ref. |
---|---|---|---|
PB-Co/CdS-LT-3 | Lactic acid | 57228 | [ |
CdS frame-in-cage particles | Na2S and Na2SO3 | 13600 | [ |
g-C3N4-7% Fe2N | TEOA | 88.7 | [ |
CdS-YS | Na2S and Na2SO3 | 3051.4 | [ |
FNS@ZIS-2 | — | 10465 | [ |
Cd0.5Zn0.5S | Na2SO3 and Na2S | 4341.6 | [ |
PBA-TiO2 (Janus) | TEOA and NaIO3 | 198 | [ |
Table 2 Summary of the PHE performances of representative PBA-derived photocatalysts.
Catalyst | Sacrificial reagent | PHE rate (μmol h-1 g-1) | Ref. |
---|---|---|---|
PB-Co/CdS-LT-3 | Lactic acid | 57228 | [ |
CdS frame-in-cage particles | Na2S and Na2SO3 | 13600 | [ |
g-C3N4-7% Fe2N | TEOA | 88.7 | [ |
CdS-YS | Na2S and Na2SO3 | 3051.4 | [ |
FNS@ZIS-2 | — | 10465 | [ |
Cd0.5Zn0.5S | Na2SO3 and Na2S | 4341.6 | [ |
PBA-TiO2 (Janus) | TEOA and NaIO3 | 198 | [ |
Electrocatalyst | j (mA cm-2) | η (mV) | Tafel slope (mV dec-1) | Electrolyte | Ref. |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Co3S4@MoS2 | 10 | 136 | 74 | 1 M KOH | [ |
(Ni,Co)Se2-GA | 10 | 128 | 70 | 1 M KOH | [ |
P-Co0.9Ni0.9Fe1.2 NCs | 10 | 200.7 | 50.5 | 1 M KOH | [ |
nPBA@Co(OH)2/NF | 10 | 290 | 130 | 1 M KOH | [ |
Fe-CoxP NCs | 10 | 127 | 55 | 0.5 M H2SO4 | [ |
P-S-24 | 10 | 61 | 67 | 1 M KOH | [ |
MoS2-NiNi PBA | 10 | 144 | 39.5 | 0.5 M H2SO4 | [ |
CNBO-NSs | 10 | 140 | 116 | 1 M KOH | [ |
NCF-MOF | 10 | 270 | 114 | 0.1 M KOH | [ |
FeP/GA | 10 | 150 | 65 | 0.5 M H2SO4 | [ |
10 | 240 | 142 | 1 M KOH | ||
MoS2-NiNi PBA | 10 | 144 | 39.5 | 0.5 M H2SO4 | [ |
Co@NG-acid | 10 | 200 | 112 | 1 M KOH | [ |
FeCo | 10 | 149 | 77 | 1 M KOH | [ |
NCF-MOF | 10 | 270 | 114 | 0.1 M KOH | [ |
Ni-Co-P-300 | 10 | 150 | 60.6 | 1 M KOH | [ |
Fe-CoP HTPAs | 10 | 98 | 90 | 1 M KOH | [ |
MoP@PC | 10 | 51 | 45 | 0.5 M H2SO4 | [ |
FeP/GA | 10 | 150 | 65 | 1 M KOH | [ |
(Ni,Co)Se2-GA | 10 | 128 | 79 | 1 M KOH | [ |
Fe-CoxP NCs | 10 | 125 | 55 | 0.5 M H2SO4 | [ |
Ni-Co-MoS2 | 10 | 155 | 51 | 0.5 M H2SO4 | [ |
Ni-Fe-P | 10 | 98 | 50 | 1 M KOH | [ |
Ni2P/NiCoP@NCCs | 10 | 116 | 79 | 1 M KOH | [ |
Co0.6Fe0.4P | 10 | 133 | 61 | 1 M KOH | [ |
Co@Co-N/rGO | 10 | 180 | 43 | 1 M KOH | [ |
FeP NPs | 10 | 115 | 56 | 1 M KOH | [ |
Mn0.6Co0.4P-rGO | 10 | 54 | 63 | 1 M KOH | [ |
Fe-CoP | 10 | 78 | 92 | 1 M KOH | [ |
Table 3 Summary of the HER activities of several PB/PBAs-based electrocatalysts in different electrolytes.
Electrocatalyst | j (mA cm-2) | η (mV) | Tafel slope (mV dec-1) | Electrolyte | Ref. |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Co3S4@MoS2 | 10 | 136 | 74 | 1 M KOH | [ |
(Ni,Co)Se2-GA | 10 | 128 | 70 | 1 M KOH | [ |
P-Co0.9Ni0.9Fe1.2 NCs | 10 | 200.7 | 50.5 | 1 M KOH | [ |
nPBA@Co(OH)2/NF | 10 | 290 | 130 | 1 M KOH | [ |
Fe-CoxP NCs | 10 | 127 | 55 | 0.5 M H2SO4 | [ |
P-S-24 | 10 | 61 | 67 | 1 M KOH | [ |
MoS2-NiNi PBA | 10 | 144 | 39.5 | 0.5 M H2SO4 | [ |
CNBO-NSs | 10 | 140 | 116 | 1 M KOH | [ |
NCF-MOF | 10 | 270 | 114 | 0.1 M KOH | [ |
FeP/GA | 10 | 150 | 65 | 0.5 M H2SO4 | [ |
10 | 240 | 142 | 1 M KOH | ||
MoS2-NiNi PBA | 10 | 144 | 39.5 | 0.5 M H2SO4 | [ |
Co@NG-acid | 10 | 200 | 112 | 1 M KOH | [ |
FeCo | 10 | 149 | 77 | 1 M KOH | [ |
NCF-MOF | 10 | 270 | 114 | 0.1 M KOH | [ |
Ni-Co-P-300 | 10 | 150 | 60.6 | 1 M KOH | [ |
Fe-CoP HTPAs | 10 | 98 | 90 | 1 M KOH | [ |
MoP@PC | 10 | 51 | 45 | 0.5 M H2SO4 | [ |
FeP/GA | 10 | 150 | 65 | 1 M KOH | [ |
(Ni,Co)Se2-GA | 10 | 128 | 79 | 1 M KOH | [ |
Fe-CoxP NCs | 10 | 125 | 55 | 0.5 M H2SO4 | [ |
Ni-Co-MoS2 | 10 | 155 | 51 | 0.5 M H2SO4 | [ |
Ni-Fe-P | 10 | 98 | 50 | 1 M KOH | [ |
Ni2P/NiCoP@NCCs | 10 | 116 | 79 | 1 M KOH | [ |
Co0.6Fe0.4P | 10 | 133 | 61 | 1 M KOH | [ |
Co@Co-N/rGO | 10 | 180 | 43 | 1 M KOH | [ |
FeP NPs | 10 | 115 | 56 | 1 M KOH | [ |
Mn0.6Co0.4P-rGO | 10 | 54 | 63 | 1 M KOH | [ |
Fe-CoP | 10 | 78 | 92 | 1 M KOH | [ |
Electrocatalyst | j (mA cm-2) | η (mV) | Tafel slope (mV dec-1) | Electrolyte | Ref. |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Co3S4@MoS2 | 10 | 280 | 43 | 1 M KOH | [ |
(Ni,Co)Se2-GA | 10 | 250 | 70 | 1 M KOH | [ |
Co9S8@NC-800 | 10 | ≈302 | 67 | 0.1 M KOH | [ |
Fe-CoP/NF | 10 | 190 | 36 | 1 M KOH | [ |
P-Co0.9Ni0.9Fe1.2 NCs P-S-NiFe NCs P-NiFe-800 NPs CoP/NC | 10 10 10 10 | 273.1 270 270.1 350 | 46.9 35 39 57 | 1 M KOH 1 M KOH 1 M KOH 1 M KOH | [ [ [ [ |
Fe-CoP cage Ni-Co PBA cages NiFe/NF nPBA@Co(OH)2/NF CuFe oxide/CF (Ni,Co)Se2 (NiFe)PS3 P-S-24 FCN-40-P NiFe(OH)x/CP | 10 10 80 20 20 10 10 10 100 10 10 | 300 380 270 270 270 300 278 275 268 265 261 | 35.2 50 28 33 46 68 65 41.7 27 52 33.8 | 1 M KOH 1 M KOH 1 M KOH 0.1 M KOH 1 M KOH 1 M KOH 1 M KOH 1 M KOH 1 M KOH 1 M KOH 1 M KOH | [ [ [ [ [ [ [ [ [ [ |
FeCoP-400 NixCo3-xO4/NF Fe-Co-F-400 Fe-NiO/CC CNBO-NSs NCF-MOF CoSe2 NBs O-NiFe@C-600 | 100 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 | 303 261 287 250 218 300 320 335 300 | 33.8 50 88 38.3 47 60 119 54.2 56.72 | 1 M KOH 1 M KOH 1 M KOH 1 M KOH 1 M KOH 1 M KOH 0.1 M KOH 1 M KOH 1 M KOH | [ [ [ [ [ [ [ [ |
CoFe@NC-NCNT-H | 10 | 380 | 99.6 | 0.1 M KOH | [ |
Table 4 Summary of the OER activities of PB/PBAs-based electrocatalysts in different electrolytes.
Electrocatalyst | j (mA cm-2) | η (mV) | Tafel slope (mV dec-1) | Electrolyte | Ref. |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Co3S4@MoS2 | 10 | 280 | 43 | 1 M KOH | [ |
(Ni,Co)Se2-GA | 10 | 250 | 70 | 1 M KOH | [ |
Co9S8@NC-800 | 10 | ≈302 | 67 | 0.1 M KOH | [ |
Fe-CoP/NF | 10 | 190 | 36 | 1 M KOH | [ |
P-Co0.9Ni0.9Fe1.2 NCs P-S-NiFe NCs P-NiFe-800 NPs CoP/NC | 10 10 10 10 | 273.1 270 270.1 350 | 46.9 35 39 57 | 1 M KOH 1 M KOH 1 M KOH 1 M KOH | [ [ [ [ |
Fe-CoP cage Ni-Co PBA cages NiFe/NF nPBA@Co(OH)2/NF CuFe oxide/CF (Ni,Co)Se2 (NiFe)PS3 P-S-24 FCN-40-P NiFe(OH)x/CP | 10 10 80 20 20 10 10 10 100 10 10 | 300 380 270 270 270 300 278 275 268 265 261 | 35.2 50 28 33 46 68 65 41.7 27 52 33.8 | 1 M KOH 1 M KOH 1 M KOH 0.1 M KOH 1 M KOH 1 M KOH 1 M KOH 1 M KOH 1 M KOH 1 M KOH 1 M KOH | [ [ [ [ [ [ [ [ [ [ |
FeCoP-400 NixCo3-xO4/NF Fe-Co-F-400 Fe-NiO/CC CNBO-NSs NCF-MOF CoSe2 NBs O-NiFe@C-600 | 100 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 | 303 261 287 250 218 300 320 335 300 | 33.8 50 88 38.3 47 60 119 54.2 56.72 | 1 M KOH 1 M KOH 1 M KOH 1 M KOH 1 M KOH 1 M KOH 0.1 M KOH 1 M KOH 1 M KOH | [ [ [ [ [ [ [ [ |
CoFe@NC-NCNT-H | 10 | 380 | 99.6 | 0.1 M KOH | [ |
|
[1] | Xuli Li, Ning Li, Yangqin Gao, Lei Ge. Design and applications of hollow-structured nanomaterials for photocatalytic H2 evolution and CO2 reduction [J]. Chinese Journal of Catalysis, 2022, 43(3): 679-707. |
[2] | Guodong Li, Yongjie Qin, Yu Wu, Lei Pei, Qi Hu, Hengpan Yang, Qianling Zhang, Jianhong Liu, Chuanxin He. Nitrogen and sulfur dual-doped high-surface-area hollow carbon nanospheres for efficient CO2 reduction [J]. Chinese Journal of Catalysis, 2020, 41(5): 830-838. |
Viewed | ||||||
Full text |
|
|||||
Abstract |
|
|||||