Chinese Journal of Catalysis ›› 2024, Vol. 63: 16-32.DOI: 10.1016/S1872-2067(24)60080-X
• Reviews • Previous Articles Next Articles
Qinghui Rena, Liang Xub,*(), Mengyu Lva, Zhiyuan Zhangc, Zhenhua Lia,c,*(
), Mingfei Shaoa,c,*(
), Xue Duana,c
Received:
2024-03-06
Accepted:
2024-06-05
Online:
2024-08-18
Published:
2024-08-19
Contact:
*E-mail: XL@buct.edu.cn to (L. Xu), LZH0307@mail.buct.edu.cn (Z. Li), shaomf@mail.buct.edu.cn (M. Shao).
About author:
Liang Xu received her PhD degree in Chemical Engineering and Technology from Beijing University of Chemical Technology (BUCT) (China) in 2019. She did postdoctoral research at the Institute of Chemistry, Chinese Academy of Sciences from 2020 to 2023. Then she served as a lecturer at BUCT. Her research interests mainly focus on the electrocatalytic conversion of CO2/NOx into high value-added chemicals.Supported by:
Qinghui Ren, Liang Xu, Mengyu Lv, Zhiyuan Zhang, Zhenhua Li, Mingfei Shao, Xue Duan. Cation effects in electrocatalytic reduction reactions: Recent advances[J]. Chinese Journal of Catalysis, 2024, 63: 16-32.
Add to citation manager EndNote|Ris|BibTeX
URL: https://www.cjcatal.com/EN/10.1016/S1872-2067(24)60080-X
Fig. 4. (a) CO2RR in a medium containing alkali metal cations (AM+). (b) DFT-MD simulations of CO2 and electrode distances in different electrolytes. Reprinted with permission from Ref. [75], Copyright 2023, Springer Nature. (c) CO2RR product Faradaic efficiency (FE) and total current densities of Cu(OH)2 nanoparticles at -1.0 vs. RHE under various cations conditions. (d) Observation of *CO dynamics in Li+ through TR-SERS. Reprinted with permission from Ref. [76] Copyright 2023, American Chemical Society.
Fig. 5. (a) Free energy profile for the electroreduction of CO2 to CO on the Ag (111) electrode surfaces. (b) CO2 adsorption energy as a function of the field. Reprinted with permission from Ref. [57] Copyright 2016 American Chemical Society. (c) A higher hydrated Cs+ concentration on the outer Helmholtz plane induces a stronger interfacial electric field. (d) Normalized (to Li+) CO partial current density on Ag (110), Ag (111), and polycrystalline Ag (pc-Ag) at -1.0 V vs. RHE) in the presence of different alkali metal cations. Reprinted with permission from Refs. [56] Copyright 2019, Royal Society of Chemistry.
Fig. 6. (a) Effect of the cation radius on the local pH and pKa of cation hydrolysis. (b) The FE for CO increased and that for H2 decreased with increasing cation size owing to decreased polarization. Reprinted with permission from Ref. [77]. Copyright 2016, American Chemical Society. (c) Schematic of the pH test at the Au-electrolyte interface in situ using ATR-SEIRAS. (d) Steady-state pH at the metal-electrolyte interface during the electroreduction of CO2. Reprinted with permission from Ref. [82]. Copyright 2017, American Chemical Society.
Fig. 7. (a) Impact of multivalent cations on HER. (b) Relationship between the performance of CO2RR and HER and the ionic radius and acidity of the cations at high potentials. Reprinted with permission from Ref. [86]. Copyright 2021, American Chemical Society. (c) Schematic of the double layer near cathode in the electrolyte. (d) FE of formic acid on SnO2/C catalyst with different cations. Reprinted with permission from Ref. [79]. Copyright 2022, Springer Nature.
Catalyst | Reaction | |Current density (mA cm-2)|/Selectivity (%)/FE (%) | Ref. | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
No added cations | Li+ | Na+ | K+ | Cs+ | |||
Ag GDE | CO2 to CO | 5.5/8 | 22/30 | 27/62 | 28/65 | 32/75 | [ |
Ag | CO2 to CO | - | - | 97/85 | 276/94 | 315/98 | [ |
Cu | CO2 to C2 | - | 4.7 | 5.1 | 6.6 | 8.5 | [ |
Au | CO2 to CO | - | 0.11 | 0.25 | 0.58 | 0.82 | [ |
Au | CO2 to CO | - | 0.76 | 0.9 | 0.98 | 1.6 | [ |
Ag | CO2 to CO | - | 3.8 | 4.9 | 6.6 | 8.3 | [ |
Cu | CO to C2 | - | 2.9/37 | 5.7/50 | 9.2/58 | 13/55 | [ |
Au | CO2 to CO | - | 0.03/3.1 | 0.79/19.5 | 1.02/50.2 | 1.04/49.1 | [ |
Ag | CO2 to CO | - | 3.5/81 | 8.6/91 | 12.1/97 | 12.5/98 | [ |
SnO2/C | CO2 to formic acid | - | 25.2 | 40.5 | 59.9 | 81.0 | [ |
Sn | NO3- to NH3 | - | 15 | 21 | 22 | 39 | [ |
Heat-carbon black | O2 to H2O2 | - | 0.53/76 | - | 0.74/90 | 1.27/93 | [ |
Pt | O2 to H2O2 | - | 0.64 | 0.79 | 0.90 | 0.56 | [ |
Carbon nanotube | O2 to H2O2 | 0.6/4.1 | - | 0.89/36.6 | - | - | [ |
Reduced graphene oxide | O2 to H2O2 | 5.7/10 | - | 150/41.4 | - | - | [ |
Pt5Gd | O2 to H2O2 | - | 4.8 | 2.7 | 2.5 | 2.0 | [ |
Pt (111) | O2 to H2O2 | - | 1.1 | 3.3 | 4.7 | 5.0 | [ |
TiO2 a | Oxalic acid to glycollic acid | 100/63.7 | 190/84.8 (Al3+) | 69.8 | 69.0 | 66.0 (Mg2+) | [ |
Table 1 The impact of cation species and concentration on electroreduction reactions activity.
Catalyst | Reaction | |Current density (mA cm-2)|/Selectivity (%)/FE (%) | Ref. | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
No added cations | Li+ | Na+ | K+ | Cs+ | |||
Ag GDE | CO2 to CO | 5.5/8 | 22/30 | 27/62 | 28/65 | 32/75 | [ |
Ag | CO2 to CO | - | - | 97/85 | 276/94 | 315/98 | [ |
Cu | CO2 to C2 | - | 4.7 | 5.1 | 6.6 | 8.5 | [ |
Au | CO2 to CO | - | 0.11 | 0.25 | 0.58 | 0.82 | [ |
Au | CO2 to CO | - | 0.76 | 0.9 | 0.98 | 1.6 | [ |
Ag | CO2 to CO | - | 3.8 | 4.9 | 6.6 | 8.3 | [ |
Cu | CO to C2 | - | 2.9/37 | 5.7/50 | 9.2/58 | 13/55 | [ |
Au | CO2 to CO | - | 0.03/3.1 | 0.79/19.5 | 1.02/50.2 | 1.04/49.1 | [ |
Ag | CO2 to CO | - | 3.5/81 | 8.6/91 | 12.1/97 | 12.5/98 | [ |
SnO2/C | CO2 to formic acid | - | 25.2 | 40.5 | 59.9 | 81.0 | [ |
Sn | NO3- to NH3 | - | 15 | 21 | 22 | 39 | [ |
Heat-carbon black | O2 to H2O2 | - | 0.53/76 | - | 0.74/90 | 1.27/93 | [ |
Pt | O2 to H2O2 | - | 0.64 | 0.79 | 0.90 | 0.56 | [ |
Carbon nanotube | O2 to H2O2 | 0.6/4.1 | - | 0.89/36.6 | - | - | [ |
Reduced graphene oxide | O2 to H2O2 | 5.7/10 | - | 150/41.4 | - | - | [ |
Pt5Gd | O2 to H2O2 | - | 4.8 | 2.7 | 2.5 | 2.0 | [ |
Pt (111) | O2 to H2O2 | - | 1.1 | 3.3 | 4.7 | 5.0 | [ |
TiO2 a | Oxalic acid to glycollic acid | 100/63.7 | 190/84.8 (Al3+) | 69.8 | 69.0 | 66.0 (Mg2+) | [ |
Catalyst | Reaction | |Current density (mA cm-2)|/Selectivity (%)/FE (%) | Ref. | |
---|---|---|---|---|
Low concentration of M+ | High concentration of M+ | |||
Ag | CO2 to CO/formate | 6.2 (CO, 0.5 mol L‒1 KAc) 92.3 (formate, 0.5 mol L‒1 KAc) | 31.8 (CO, 10 mol L‒1 KAc) 66.4 (formate, 10 mol L‒1 KAc) | [ |
Cu | CO2 to CO/formate | 70.8 (CO, 0.5 mol L‒1 KAc) 8.7 (formate, 0.5 mol L‒1 KAc) | 28.7 (CO, 10 mol L‒1 KAc) 39.3 (formate, 10 mol L‒1 KAc) | [ |
Cu | CO2 to CO/C2H4 | 46.6 (CO, 0.05 mol L‒1 KOH) 8.7 (C2H4, 0.05 mol L‒1 KOH) | 2.5 (CO, 1 mol L‒1 KOH) 10.7 (C2H4, 1 mol L‒1 KOH) | [ |
CuNNAs CuNNs a | CO2 to C2 | 20.0 (CuNNAs as catalyst) | 59.0 (CuNNs as catalyst) | [ |
Au needle/Au particles a | CO2 to CO | 15.0 (Au needle as catalyst) | 98.6 (Au particles as catalyst) | [ |
Pd NTs/Pd@ArS-Pd4S NTs a | Alkyne to alkene | 51.7/70.6 (Pd NTs as catalyst) | 65.7/89.6 (Pd@ArS-Pd4S NTs as catalyst) | [ |
BiNCs | N2 to NH3 | 9.8 (0.2 mol L‒1 K+) | 66.5 (1.2 mol L‒1 K+) | [ |
heat-treated carbon black | O2 to H2O2 | 1.16 (0.1 mol L‒1 KCl) | 3.75 (0.5 mol L‒1 KCl) | [ |
Pt (111) | O2 to H2O2 | 4.3 (0.02 mol L‒1 methanesulfonic acid) | 0.8 (0.2 mol L‒1 methanesulfonic acid) | [ |
Table 2 Effect of cation concentration on electroreduction reaction activity.
Catalyst | Reaction | |Current density (mA cm-2)|/Selectivity (%)/FE (%) | Ref. | |
---|---|---|---|---|
Low concentration of M+ | High concentration of M+ | |||
Ag | CO2 to CO/formate | 6.2 (CO, 0.5 mol L‒1 KAc) 92.3 (formate, 0.5 mol L‒1 KAc) | 31.8 (CO, 10 mol L‒1 KAc) 66.4 (formate, 10 mol L‒1 KAc) | [ |
Cu | CO2 to CO/formate | 70.8 (CO, 0.5 mol L‒1 KAc) 8.7 (formate, 0.5 mol L‒1 KAc) | 28.7 (CO, 10 mol L‒1 KAc) 39.3 (formate, 10 mol L‒1 KAc) | [ |
Cu | CO2 to CO/C2H4 | 46.6 (CO, 0.05 mol L‒1 KOH) 8.7 (C2H4, 0.05 mol L‒1 KOH) | 2.5 (CO, 1 mol L‒1 KOH) 10.7 (C2H4, 1 mol L‒1 KOH) | [ |
CuNNAs CuNNs a | CO2 to C2 | 20.0 (CuNNAs as catalyst) | 59.0 (CuNNs as catalyst) | [ |
Au needle/Au particles a | CO2 to CO | 15.0 (Au needle as catalyst) | 98.6 (Au particles as catalyst) | [ |
Pd NTs/Pd@ArS-Pd4S NTs a | Alkyne to alkene | 51.7/70.6 (Pd NTs as catalyst) | 65.7/89.6 (Pd@ArS-Pd4S NTs as catalyst) | [ |
BiNCs | N2 to NH3 | 9.8 (0.2 mol L‒1 K+) | 66.5 (1.2 mol L‒1 K+) | [ |
heat-treated carbon black | O2 to H2O2 | 1.16 (0.1 mol L‒1 KCl) | 3.75 (0.5 mol L‒1 KCl) | [ |
Pt (111) | O2 to H2O2 | 4.3 (0.02 mol L‒1 methanesulfonic acid) | 0.8 (0.2 mol L‒1 methanesulfonic acid) | [ |
Fig. 8. (a) Relationship between adsorption K+ and reaction current density, and tip electric field intensity. (b) Current on different catalysts with a thin TiO2 insulator layer at a bias of -1 V. Reprinted with permission from Ref. [58]. Copyright 2016, Springer Nature. (c) Concentration of K+ and electric field at the tips of different nanoneedles. (d) The performance of CuNNs and CuNNAs. Reprinted with permission from Refs. [100]. Copyright 2022, American Chemical Society. (e) Mechanism of the CO2RR over the F-modified Cu catalyst. Reprinted with permission from Ref. [115]. Copyright 2020, Springer Nature.
Fig. 9. (a) ΔG*NNH on Bi (012), (110), and (104) facets with and without K+ cations. (b) Nitrogen reduction current density (jN), HER current density (jH), and total current density (jT) at different c(K+) values. (c) FE of NRR with different c(K+) values. Reprinted with permission from Ref. [102]. Copyright 2019. Springer Nature. Influence of different electrolytes on concentration of N species (d) and selectivity (e). Reprinted with permission from Ref. [12]. Copyright 2023, Elsevier B.V.
Fig. 10. (a) Conversions of 4-ethynylaniline and selectivity of 4-vinylaniline at -1.1 V vs. Hg/HgO. (b) ECSA-normalized linear sweep voltammetry (LSV) curves. (c) EPR trapping of hydrogen (*) and carbon (#) radicals. Reprinted with permission from Ref. [101]. Copyright 2022, American Association for the Advancement of Science. (d) Productivities and FEs of GA over TiO2 in 0.2 mol L-1 OX with different metal salts. (e) The adsorption of OX and GO over pure TiO2 and TiO2-Al3+ by electrochemical adsorbate-stripping measurements. (f) EPR trapping of hydrogen (#) radicals. Reprinted with permission from Ref. [88]. Copyright 2023, American Chemical Society.
Fig. 11. (a) Schematic of noncovalent bonding between hydrated alkali metal cations and surface-bound OH species. Reprinted with permission from Ref. [123]. Copyright 2009, Springer Nature. (b) Schematic of H+ repulsion by Na+. (c) Polarization curve of ORR for Pt/C supported on a glassy carbon electrode in O2-saturated 0.1 and 0.2 mol L?1 NaOH. Reprinted with permission from Ref. [125]. Copyright 2016 American Chemical Society. (d) The long-term galvanostatic charge-discharge profile of zinc-air cells assembled with different electrolytes. Reprinted with permission from Ref. [130]. Copyright 2021, American Chemical Society.
Fig. 12. Schematic of SHINERS. (a,b) Electromagnetic field distribution of SHINs on a Pd/Au substrate. Reprinted with permission from Ref. [135] Copyright 2021, Springer Nature. (c,d) Schematic illustration of ATR-SEIRAS. Reprinted with permission from Ref. [94]. Copyright 2020, American Chemical Society. Reprinted with permission from Ref. [111]. Copyright 2019, Elsevier Ltd. (e) Schematic illustration of the LICT. Reprinted with permission from Ref. [139]. Copyright 2022, John Wiley and Sons.
|
[1] | Zichao Huang, Tinghui Yang, Yingbing Zhang, Chaoqun Guan, Wenke Gui, Min Kuang, Jianping Yang. Enhancing selectivity in acidic CO2 electrolysis: Cation effects and catalyst innovation [J]. Chinese Journal of Catalysis, 2024, 63(8): 61-80. |
[2] | Nan Mu, Tingting Bo, Yugao Hu, Ruixin Xu, Yanyu Liu, Wei Zhou. Single-atom catalysts based on polarization switching of ferroelectric In2Se3 for N2 reduction [J]. Chinese Journal of Catalysis, 2024, 63(8): 244-257. |
[3] | Chunguang Chen, Jinfeng Zhang, Hailiang Chu, Lixian Sun, Graham Dawson, Kai Dai. Chalcogenide-based S-scheme heterojunction photocatalysts [J]. Chinese Journal of Catalysis, 2024, 63(8): 81-108. |
[4] | Yunying Huo, Cong Guo, Yongle Zhang, Jingyi Liu, Qiao Zhang, Zhiting Liu, Guangxing Yang, Rengui Li, Feng Peng. Realizing efficient electrochemical oxidation of 5-hydroxymethylfurfural on a freestanding Ni(OH)2/nickel foam catalyst [J]. Chinese Journal of Catalysis, 2024, 63(8): 282-291. |
[5] | Xinyu Chen, Cong-Cong Zhao, Jing Ren, Bo Li, Qianqian Liu, Wei Li, Fan Yang, Siqi Lu, YuFei Zhao, Li-Kai Yan, Hong-Ying Zang. An oxygen-vacancy-rich polyoxometalate-aided Ag-based heterojunction electrocatalyst for nitrogen fixation [J]. Chinese Journal of Catalysis, 2024, 62(7): 209-218. |
[6] | Ziwen Mei, Kejun Chen, Yao Tan, Qiuwen Liu, Qin Chen, Qiyou Wang, Xiqing Wang, Chao Cai, Kang Liu, Junwei Fu, Min Liu. Proton feeding from defect-rich carbon support to cobalt phthalocyanine for efficient CO2 electroreduction [J]. Chinese Journal of Catalysis, 2024, 62(7): 190-197. |
[7] | Shujiao Yang, Pengfei Jiang, Kaihang Yue, Kai Guo, Luna Yang, Jinxiu Han, Xinyang Peng, Xuepeng Zhang, Haoquan Zheng, Tao Yang, Rui Cao, Ya Yan, Wei Zhang. Manganese pyrophosphate with multiple coordinated water molecules for electrocatalytic water oxidation [J]. Chinese Journal of Catalysis, 2024, 62(7): 166-177. |
[8] | Hong-Rui Zhu, Hui-Min Xu, Chen-Jin Huang, Zhi-Jie Zhang, Qi-Ni Zhan, Ting-Yu Shuai, Gao-Ren Li. Recent advances of the catalysts for photoelectrocatalytic oxygen evolution and CO2 reduction reactions [J]. Chinese Journal of Catalysis, 2024, 62(7): 53-107. |
[9] | Zhenlin Chen, Jing Xue, Lei Wu, Kun Dang, Hongwei Ji, Chuncheng Chen, Yuchao Zhang, Jincai Zhao. Synergistic photoelectric and thermal effect for efficient nitrate reduction on plasmonic Cu photocathodes [J]. Chinese Journal of Catalysis, 2024, 62(7): 219-230. |
[10] | Qing Liu, Xue-Feng Cheng, Jin-Yan Huo, Xiao-Fang Liu, Huilong Dong, Hongbo Zeng, Qing-Feng Xu, Jian-Mei Lu. Manipulating the interactions between N-intermediates and one-dimensional conjugated coordination polymers to boost electroreduction of nitrate to ammonia [J]. Chinese Journal of Catalysis, 2024, 62(7): 231-242. |
[11] | Jieyu Liu, Haiqiang Guo, Yulin Xiong, Xing Chen, Yifu Yu, Changhong Wang. Rational design of Pt-anchored single-atom alloy electrocatalysts for NO-to-NH3 conversion by density functional theory and machine learning [J]. Chinese Journal of Catalysis, 2024, 62(7): 243-253. |
[12] | Rui Chen, Xiang Fang, Dongfang Zhang, Lanqi He, Yinlong Wu, Chenghua Sun, Kun Wang, Shuqin Song. In-situ construction of three-dimensional ordered cobalt-nitrogen- carbon nanotubes integrated self-supporting electrode for efficiently electrocatalyzing oxygen reduction reaction [J]. Chinese Journal of Catalysis, 2024, 61(6): 237-246. |
[13] | Wangyan Gou, Yichen Wang, Mingkai Zhang, Xiaohe Tan, Yuanyuan Ma, Yongquan Qu. A review on fundamentals for designing stable ruthenium-based catalysts for the hydrogen and oxygen evolution reactions [J]. Chinese Journal of Catalysis, 2024, 60(5): 68-106. |
[14] | Guangtong Hai, Zhongheng Fu, Xin Liu, Xiubing Huang. Recent progress in electrocatalytic reduction of nitrogen to ammonia [J]. Chinese Journal of Catalysis, 2024, 60(5): 107-127. |
[15] | Chang’an Wang, Ying Ouyang, Yibin Luo, Xinru Gao, Hongyi Gao, Ge Wang, Xingtian Shu. Review on recent advances in phase change materials for enhancing the catalytic process [J]. Chinese Journal of Catalysis, 2024, 60(5): 128-157. |
Viewed | ||||||
Full text |
|
|||||
Abstract |
|
|||||