Chinese Journal of Catalysis ›› 2024, Vol. 66: 20-52.DOI: 10.1016/S1872-2067(24)60123-3
• Reviews • Previous Articles Next Articles
Received:
2024-07-25
Accepted:
2024-08-28
Online:
2024-11-18
Published:
2024-11-10
Contact:
*E-mail: About author:
Jingqi Guan (Jilin University) was invited as a young member of the 6th Editorial Board of Chin. J. Catal. and the 5th Editorial Board of Acta Phys.-Chim. Sin. Prof. Jingqi Guan received his B.A. degree in 2002 and Ph.D. degree in 2007 from Jilin University. He carried out postdoctoral research in the University of California at Berkeley from 2012 to 2013 and in Dalian Institute of Chemical Physics, Chinese Academy of Sciences from 2014 to 2018. His research interests are in engineering single-atom catalysts and 2D materials for electrocatalysis, renewable energy, and biosensors. He has published more than 210 peer-reviewed papers.
Supported by:
Siyu Chen, Jingqi Guan. Structural regulation strategies of nitrogen reduction electrocatalysts[J]. Chinese Journal of Catalysis, 2024, 66: 20-52.
Add to citation manager EndNote|Ris|BibTeX
URL: https://www.cjcatal.com/EN/10.1016/S1872-2067(24)60123-3
Electrocatalyst | Electrolyte | Potential (V vs. RHE) | NH3 yield | Faraday efficiency (%) | Ref. |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Pd-NTA-NF | 0.1 mol L-1 Na2SO4 | -0.15 | 5.45 μg h-1 cm-2 | 20.10 | [ |
La2O3@C | 0.1 mol L-1 Na2SO4 | -0.3 | 20.59 μg h-1 mg-1 | 17.10 | [ |
MoS2 | 0.1 mol L-1 Na2SO4 | -0.5 | 8.08 × 10-11 mol s-1 cm-2 | 1.17 | [ |
FeRu-CNS | 0.1 mol L-1 Na2SO4 | -0.2 | 43.9 μg h-1 mg-1 | 29.30 | [ |
V-C3N4 | 0.1 mol L-1 Na2SO4 | -0.3 | 31.41 μgNH3 h-1 mgcat-1 | 76.53 | [ |
V-NG | 0.1 mol L-1 Na2SO4 | -0.2 | 19.88 μgNH3 h-1 mgcat-1 | 13.69 | [ |
B-Mo2C/NC-50 | 0.5 mol L-1 K2SO4 | -0.5 | 42.9 μg h-1 mg-1 | 36.90 | [ |
FL-MoS2-20 | 1 mol L-1 K2SO4 | -0.5 | 92.95 μg h-1 mg-1 | 20.80 | [ |
AuHNCs | 0.5 mol L-1 LiClO4 | -0.5 | 3.98 μg h-1 cm-2 | 30.20 | [ |
MoO3-x/MXene | 0.5 mol L-1 LiClO4 | -0.4 | 95.8 μg h-1 mg-1 | 21.20 | [ |
Cl-RGO | 0.05 mol L-1 H2SO4 | -0.3 | 0.9 μg h-1 mgcat-1 | 5.97 | [ |
Np-B13C12 | 0.05 mol L-1 H2SO4 | -0.05 | 91.28 μg h-1 mgcat-1 | 35.53 | [ |
2D-C3N4-NV | 0.1 mol L-1 HCl | -0.3 | 17.85μg h-1 mgcat-1 | 10.96 | [ |
D-FeN/C | 0.1 mol L-1 KOH | -0.4 | 24.8 μg h-1 mgcat-1 | 15.80 | [ |
Ru SAs/g-C3N4 | 0.5 mol L-1 NaOH | 0.05 | 23.0 μg mgcat-1 h-1 | 8.30 | [ |
Table 1 Comparison of NRR performance on various electrocatalysts.
Electrocatalyst | Electrolyte | Potential (V vs. RHE) | NH3 yield | Faraday efficiency (%) | Ref. |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Pd-NTA-NF | 0.1 mol L-1 Na2SO4 | -0.15 | 5.45 μg h-1 cm-2 | 20.10 | [ |
La2O3@C | 0.1 mol L-1 Na2SO4 | -0.3 | 20.59 μg h-1 mg-1 | 17.10 | [ |
MoS2 | 0.1 mol L-1 Na2SO4 | -0.5 | 8.08 × 10-11 mol s-1 cm-2 | 1.17 | [ |
FeRu-CNS | 0.1 mol L-1 Na2SO4 | -0.2 | 43.9 μg h-1 mg-1 | 29.30 | [ |
V-C3N4 | 0.1 mol L-1 Na2SO4 | -0.3 | 31.41 μgNH3 h-1 mgcat-1 | 76.53 | [ |
V-NG | 0.1 mol L-1 Na2SO4 | -0.2 | 19.88 μgNH3 h-1 mgcat-1 | 13.69 | [ |
B-Mo2C/NC-50 | 0.5 mol L-1 K2SO4 | -0.5 | 42.9 μg h-1 mg-1 | 36.90 | [ |
FL-MoS2-20 | 1 mol L-1 K2SO4 | -0.5 | 92.95 μg h-1 mg-1 | 20.80 | [ |
AuHNCs | 0.5 mol L-1 LiClO4 | -0.5 | 3.98 μg h-1 cm-2 | 30.20 | [ |
MoO3-x/MXene | 0.5 mol L-1 LiClO4 | -0.4 | 95.8 μg h-1 mg-1 | 21.20 | [ |
Cl-RGO | 0.05 mol L-1 H2SO4 | -0.3 | 0.9 μg h-1 mgcat-1 | 5.97 | [ |
Np-B13C12 | 0.05 mol L-1 H2SO4 | -0.05 | 91.28 μg h-1 mgcat-1 | 35.53 | [ |
2D-C3N4-NV | 0.1 mol L-1 HCl | -0.3 | 17.85μg h-1 mgcat-1 | 10.96 | [ |
D-FeN/C | 0.1 mol L-1 KOH | -0.4 | 24.8 μg h-1 mgcat-1 | 15.80 | [ |
Ru SAs/g-C3N4 | 0.5 mol L-1 NaOH | 0.05 | 23.0 μg mgcat-1 h-1 | 8.30 | [ |
Reaction mechanism | Reaction mechanism | Electrocatalyst | Ref. |
---|---|---|---|
Dissociation mechanism | N2 + 2* → 2*N 2*N + 2e- + 2H* → 2*NH 2*NH + 2e- + 2H+ → 2NH3 + 2* | Co/CeN | [ |
Association mechanism (distal pathway) | N2 + * → *N2 *N2 + e- +H+ → *NNH *NNH + e- + H+ → *NNH2 *NNH2 + e- + H* → *N + NH3 *N + e- + H* → *NH *NH + e- + H+ → *NH2 *NH2 + e- + H+ → NH3 + * | PdFe3 | [ |
Association mechanism (alternative path) | N2 + * → *N2 *N2 + e- + H+ → *NNH *NNH + e- + H+ → *NHNH *NHNH + e- + H+ → *NHNH2 *NHNH2 + e- + H+ → *NH2NH2 *NH2NH2 + e- + H+ → *NH2 + NH3 *NH2 + e- + H+ → NH3+ * | C-SiP-NSs | [ |
Association mechanism (enzymatic mechanism) | N2+ * → *NN* *NN* + e- + H* → *NH*N *NH*N + e- + H+ → *NH*NH *NH*NH + e- + H+ → *NH2*NH *NH2*NH + e- + H+ → *NH2*NH2 *NH2*NH2 + e- + H+ → *NH2 + NH3 *NH2 + e- + H+ → NH3 + * | Re@MoS2 | [ |
MvK mechanism | S-N + 3e- + 3H+ → S-NH3 S-NH3 → S-NV + NH3 S-NV + N2 → NΞN-S NΞN-S + 3H+ + 3e- → NH3…N-S NH3…N-S → N-S + NH3 | Fe3Mo3N | [ |
Table 2 Basic processes of different ENRR mechanisms.
Reaction mechanism | Reaction mechanism | Electrocatalyst | Ref. |
---|---|---|---|
Dissociation mechanism | N2 + 2* → 2*N 2*N + 2e- + 2H* → 2*NH 2*NH + 2e- + 2H+ → 2NH3 + 2* | Co/CeN | [ |
Association mechanism (distal pathway) | N2 + * → *N2 *N2 + e- +H+ → *NNH *NNH + e- + H+ → *NNH2 *NNH2 + e- + H* → *N + NH3 *N + e- + H* → *NH *NH + e- + H+ → *NH2 *NH2 + e- + H+ → NH3 + * | PdFe3 | [ |
Association mechanism (alternative path) | N2 + * → *N2 *N2 + e- + H+ → *NNH *NNH + e- + H+ → *NHNH *NHNH + e- + H+ → *NHNH2 *NHNH2 + e- + H+ → *NH2NH2 *NH2NH2 + e- + H+ → *NH2 + NH3 *NH2 + e- + H+ → NH3+ * | C-SiP-NSs | [ |
Association mechanism (enzymatic mechanism) | N2+ * → *NN* *NN* + e- + H* → *NH*N *NH*N + e- + H+ → *NH*NH *NH*NH + e- + H+ → *NH2*NH *NH2*NH + e- + H+ → *NH2*NH2 *NH2*NH2 + e- + H+ → *NH2 + NH3 *NH2 + e- + H+ → NH3 + * | Re@MoS2 | [ |
MvK mechanism | S-N + 3e- + 3H+ → S-NH3 S-NH3 → S-NV + NH3 S-NV + N2 → NΞN-S NΞN-S + 3H+ + 3e- → NH3…N-S NH3…N-S → N-S + NH3 | Fe3Mo3N | [ |
Fig. 2. Schematic diagram of ENRR on the surface of a electrocatalyst. (a) Dissociation mechanism; (b) association distal mechanism; (c) association alternating mechanism; (d) enzymatic mechanism.
Fig. 3. (a) Free energy graph of ENRR on PdFe3@G. Reproduced with permission [62]. Copyright 2023, Wiley-VCH GmbH. (b) Analysis of charge density difference of N2 on SiP. (c) N2 free energy diagram of alternate pathways at the C-SiP NSs zigzag Si site at 0 V. (d) Each step corresponds to the atomic configuration. Reproduced with permission [63]. Copyright 2022, Wiley-VCH GmbH.
Fig. 4. (a) Structure diagram of FeMo-co. (b) A comparison of the distal and alternating pathways, along with a diagram illustrating the differences in intermediates. Reproduced with permission [69]. Copyright 2011, American Chemical Society. (c) Volcanic maps of stepped and flat transition metal surfaces. Reproduced with permission [67]. Copyright 2024, ELSEVIER B.V. and Science Press.
Basic synthesis method | Strength | Weakness | Electrocatalyst | Ref. |
---|---|---|---|---|
Hydrothermal synthesis | simple operation, uniform size, high purity, and controllable morphology | long experiment period, and prone to agglomeration | Fe2(MoO4)3/C | [ |
Sol-gel method | high product purity | the material is prone to deformation during heat treatment, and the composition and morphology of the product are affected by the solvent expulsion | BaCe0.80Gd0.10Sm0.10O3-δ | [ |
Electrospinning technology | it can obtain finer-sized nanofibers with stronger material stability and more functionalities | the parameters of the experiment are very strict | FeNi-Co@CM | [ |
In-situ growth method | mild reaction condition, good catalytic effect, and low production cost | it requires precise control of the catalyst's growth conditions and a thorough understanding of its surface properties | nPd/NF | [ |
Table 3 Basic synthesis methods for ENRR materials.
Basic synthesis method | Strength | Weakness | Electrocatalyst | Ref. |
---|---|---|---|---|
Hydrothermal synthesis | simple operation, uniform size, high purity, and controllable morphology | long experiment period, and prone to agglomeration | Fe2(MoO4)3/C | [ |
Sol-gel method | high product purity | the material is prone to deformation during heat treatment, and the composition and morphology of the product are affected by the solvent expulsion | BaCe0.80Gd0.10Sm0.10O3-δ | [ |
Electrospinning technology | it can obtain finer-sized nanofibers with stronger material stability and more functionalities | the parameters of the experiment are very strict | FeNi-Co@CM | [ |
In-situ growth method | mild reaction condition, good catalytic effect, and low production cost | it requires precise control of the catalyst's growth conditions and a thorough understanding of its surface properties | nPd/NF | [ |
Fig. 8. (a) Schematic diagram of electronic feedback mechanism. Reproduced with permission [85]. Copyright 2023, American Chemical Society. (b) Partial state density of penta-TiP in a 2 × 2 cell. Reproduced with permission [88]. Copyright 2019, Royal Society of Chemistry. (c) The isosurface of the deformed charge density seen from the top view. (d) The deformed charge density of *NNH. Reproduced with permission [90]. Copyright 2018, WILEY-VCH.
Fig. 9. (a) Free energy scale of NH3 released by reducing metal nitrides. Reproduced with permission [93]. Copyright 2015, Royal Society of Chemistry. (b) Magnetic susceptibility of FePPc. (c) Magnetic susceptibility of FeMoPPc. (d) Diagram of N2 binding to transition metal. Reproduced with permission [94]. Copyright 2021, Wiley-VCH GmbH. (e) Calculated projected state density. (f) The charge differential density of N2 adsorbed on B doped C2N. Reproduced with permission [95]. Copyright 2019, Royal Society of Chemistry. (g) State density of absorbed *N2 on 2D C3N4 and 2D C3N4-NV. (h) Differential charge density on 2D C3N4 and 2D C3N4-NV. Reproduced with permission [56]. Copyright 2021, ELSEVIER. (i) PDOS adsorbing B atoms before and after N2 molecules. (j) Electron density difference of N2 molecule at B2 site. Reproduced with permission [55]. Copyright 2021, Wiley-VCH GmbH.
Fig. 10. (a) DOS display of Co, P, N in BPBL-Co-NNH. (b) DOS of P and N in BPBL-NNH. (c) Change in bond length of N2 molecule during reduction. Reproduced with permission [102]. Copyright 2021, ELSEVIER B.V. and Science Press. (d) XRD comparison of phenyldiene and al-phenyldiene exposed for 7 days at 90% relative humidity. (e) Raman spectrogram of phenylene and al-phenylene exposed for 7 days at 90% relative humidity. Reproduced with permission [103]. Copyright 2024, Wiley-VCH GmbH. (f) Schematic diagram of coupling of BP quantum dots with MnO2 nanosheets. Reproduced with permission [104]. Copyright 2020, WILEY-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA, Weinheim.
Fig. 12. (a) Reducing the concentration of protons in bulk solution to limit the rate of proton transfer. (b) Increasing the barrier of proton transfer to the surface to limit the proton transfer rate. (c) Limiting electron transport rates by requiring electrons to pass through thin insulators. (d) The use of light absorbers to provide a slow flow of electrons to limit the electron transport rate. Reproduced with permission [77]. Copyright 2016, American Chemical Society.
Fig. 13. (a) PDOS of Ru atoms on Ru SAs/g-C3N4 and Ru (0001). (b) Reaction free energy path of NRR on Ru (0001). Reproduced with permission [58]. Copyright 2019, WILEY-VCH. (c) Synthetic diagram of FeRu-CNS. (d) Fe-d orbital PDOS in FeN4 and FeRu-CNS. Reproduced with permission [48]. Copyright 2023, Royal Society of Chemistry. (e) Volcanic relationship between △Gmax and △d-p. Reproduced with permission [117]. Copyright 2023, John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd.
Fig. 14. (a,b) PDOS of Fe2(DOBDC) and Fe2Cl2(BBTA) before and after doping Mo. (c) PDOS of Mo, coordination atoms and *NN after N2 adsorption on Mo (II)-Fe2F2(BBTA), Mo (II)-Fe2Cl2(BBTA) and Mo(II)-Fe2Br2(BBTA). (d) Enhanced N2 activation diagram. (e) Charge transfer diagram of Fe-X-Mo. Reproduced with permission [120]. Copyright 2022, American Chemical Society. (f,g) N2 adsorbs to the Bader charge structure of B-Mo2C and β-Mo2C. Reproduced with permission [50]. Copyright 2022, Wiley-VCH GmbH.
Fig. 15. (a) State density and d-band center diagram of MoS2 at different VS concentrations. (b) △G and *N-*N bond lengths as d-band center functions. Reproduced with permission [51]. Copyright 2023, Elsevier B.V. (c) Difference in charge density of N2 adsorbed on MoO3/MXene and MoO3-x/MXene. (d) εd of Mo-3d in MoO3/MXene and MoO3-x/MXene. (e) Charge density differences. (f) NH3 yield of MoO3/MXene, MoO3-x/MXene, MoO3 and MoO3-x. Reproduced with permission [53]. Copyright 2021, Wiley-VCH GmbH.
Fig. 16. (a) AES spectral N signals of Ni/CeN and CeN before and after the NRR. Reproduced with permission [126]. Copyright 2020, American Chemical Society. (b,c) PDOS of Fe atoms in D states and N atoms in p states of FeN4-C and D-FeN4-C. (d) Schematic diagram of electron density differences between nitrogen-containing intermediates at FeN4-C and D-FeN4-C. Reproduced with permission [57]. Copyright 2022, Wiley-VCH GmbH.
Fig. 17. (a,b) The d orbital PDOS of Rh in Rh@SnO2 and Rh (111). Reproduced with permission [131]. Copyright 2022, American Chemical Society. (c) Change of work function on NPG@SnS2 and SnS2 (101) surfaces. (d) The energy of *H on S and on Sn. (e) Total accumulation of charge in the SnS2 layer and total consumption in the NPG layer. (f) Charge dissipation and accumulation on a single atom. (g) Overall shift of charge density from NPG layer to SnS2 layer. Reproduced with permission [132]. Copyright 2021, American Chemical Society.
Fig. 19. (a) The d orbital changes of Ti before and after N2 adsorption at 2.5% tensile strain. (b) The relationship between N-N distance and charge transfer (CT). (c) Relationship between △E*(N2) and the adsorption energies of *NNH, *NNH2, *N, *NH and *NH3. Reproduced with permission [138]. Copyright 2023, Wiley-VCH GmbH.
Fig. 20. (a) OV-BP-BiVO4 hyacanthosphere heterogenous combination diagram. (b,c) XRD comparison of OV-BP-BiVO4, BP-BIVO4 and BP. (d) XPS comparison diagram of V 2p in OV-BP-BiVO4, BP-BIVO4 and BP. Reproduced with permission [143]. Copyright 2022, Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Fig. 21. (a) Diagram of BP/FeP4 heterostructure preparation. (b) Adsorption diagram of N2 and H in BP/FeP4 heterostructure. Reproduced with permission [144]. Copyright 2022, Wiley-VCH GmbH.
Fig. 22. (a) Application of Ru/Mo2C-NCNTs in Li-N2 cells. (b) Complete discharge/charging curve of Ru/Mo2C-NCNTs. (c) Cyclic diagram of Ru/Mo2C-NCNTs. (d) Characterization of Ru/Mo2C-NCNTs compared with other electrocatalysts. Reproduced with permission [146]. Copyright 2022, Elsevier B.V.
Fig. 23. (a) Octahedral d orbital splitting process. Reproduced with permission [150]. Copyright 2024, Wiley-VCH GmbH. (b-d) PDOS of N2 molecules with different adsorption structures in Fe@Mo2CS2. (e,f) The difference in charge density between vertical and horizontal adsorption structures of N2 molecules in Fe@Mo2CS2. (g) Gibbs free energy of N2 molecule in horizontal adsorption configuration. Reproduced with permission [149]. Copyright 2022, The Royal Society of Chemistry.
Fig. 24. (a) Schematic diagram of FeSA-NSC-900 synthesis. (b,c) FeN4 and FeN3S1 PDOS diagram. (d) Molecular orbital diagram of N2 in FeN4 and FeN3S1 and spin configuration of Fe. Reproduced with permission [151]. Copyright 2022, Wiley-VCH GmbH.
Fig. 25. (a) Schematic diagram of solid-solution two-phase interface. (b) Diagram of gas-solid-liquid three-phase interface. (c) Schematic diagram of some NRR devices. (d) Ammonia yield and FE of Pd/ACC catalysts at different potentials. Reproduced with permission [154]. Copyright 2019, Haiyan Science and Technology Review Publishing. (e,f) Hydrophilic and hydrophobic interface diagram. Reproduced with permission [155]. Copyright 2020, Wiley-VCH GmbH.
Fig. 27. (a,b) Schematic diagram of working electrode crystal deposition without EtOH and LiBF4. Reproduced with permission [160]. Copyright 2024, The Royal Society of Chemistry. (c) Recovery test using Ni as cathode. Reproduced with permission [161]. Copyright 2024, Elsevier B.V. (d) The ESP of THF molecule was determined by DFT. (e) Probability distribution diagram of linear ether on lithium plate. Reproduced with permission [162]. Copyright 2023, American Chemical Society.
Fig. 28. (a-d) Diagram of unseparated cell (NS), liquid-liquid cell (L-L), gas-liquid (G-L) cell, and gas-gas (G-G) cell. (e) Diagram of a three-chamber cell (G-L-L).
Fig. 29. (a) FE at -0.8 V vs. NHE. (b-d) Diagram of binding energy and bond distance of N2 molecule under different anions. (e) Ammonia yields at -0.8 V vs. NHE. Reproduced with permission [173]. Copyright 2017, The Royal Society of Chemistry. (f) Schematic diagram of electrocatalytic synthesis of ammonia and acetone in ionic liquids. (g) Ammonia yield and FE. (h) Acetone yield and FE. Reproduced with permission [174]. Copyright 2021, The Royal Society of Chemistry.
Fig. 30. (a) Effects of different interface structures on NRR. Reproduced with permission [165]. Copyright 2022, The Royal Society of Chemistry. (b) Fe1.0HTNs used to simulate the human "alveolar" diagram. Reproduced with permission [177]. Copyright 2021, The Royal Society of Chemistry. (c) Diagram of the superoxygenophilic electrode and the corresponding three-phase reaction region. Reproduced with permission [180]. Copyright 2022, Elsevier B.V.
|
[1] | Nan Mu, Tingting Bo, Yugao Hu, Ruixin Xu, Yanyu Liu, Wei Zhou. Single-atom catalysts based on polarization switching of ferroelectric In2Se3 for N2 reduction [J]. Chinese Journal of Catalysis, 2024, 63(8): 244-257. |
[2] | Shiwen Du, Fuxiang Zhang. General applications of density functional theory in photocatalysis [J]. Chinese Journal of Catalysis, 2024, 61(6): 1-36. |
[3] | Guangtong Hai, Zhongheng Fu, Xin Liu, Xiubing Huang. Recent progress in electrocatalytic reduction of nitrogen to ammonia [J]. Chinese Journal of Catalysis, 2024, 60(5): 107-127. |
[4] | Chenyu Du, Jianping Sheng, Fengyi Zhong, Ye He, Vitaliy P. Guro, Yanjuan Sun, Fan Dong. Rational design and mechanistic insights of advanced photocatalysts for CO2-to-C2+ production: Status and challenges [J]. Chinese Journal of Catalysis, 2024, 60(5): 25-41. |
[5] | Jie Wang, Yihe Chen, Yuda Wang, Hao Zhao, Jinyu Ye, Qingqing Cheng, Hui Yang. Manipulating the electronic state of ruthenium to boost highly selective electrooxidation of ethylene to ethylene glycol in acid [J]. Chinese Journal of Catalysis, 2024, 60(5): 376-385. |
[6] | Ya’nan Xia, Jingqi Chi, Junheng Tang, Xiaobin Liu, Zhenyu Xiao, Jianping Lai, Lei Wang. Research progress of anionic vacancies in electrocatalysts for oxygen evolution reaction [J]. Chinese Journal of Catalysis, 2024, 66(11): 110-138. |
[7] | Ziyuan Xiu, Wei Mu, Xin Zhou, Xiaojun Han. Mild polarization electric field in ultra-thin BN-Fe-graphene sandwich structure for efficient nitrogen reduction [J]. Chinese Journal of Catalysis, 2024, 65(10): 126-137. |
[8] | Ji Zhang, Aimin Yu, Chenghua Sun. Theoretical insights into heteronuclear dual metals on non-metal doped graphene for nitrogen reduction reaction [J]. Chinese Journal of Catalysis, 2023, 52(9): 263-270. |
[9] | Liyuan Gong, Ying Wang, Jie Liu, Xian Wang, Yang Li, Shuai Hou, Zhijian Wu, Zhao Jin, Changpeng Liu, Wei Xing, Junjie Ge. Reshaping the coordination and electronic structure of single atom sites on the right branch of ORR volcano plot [J]. Chinese Journal of Catalysis, 2023, 50(7): 352-360. |
[10] | Yuannan Wang, Lina Wang, Kexin Zhang, Jingyao Xu, Qiannan Wu, Zhoubing Xie, Wei An, Xiao Liang, Xiaoxin Zou. Electrocatalytic water splitting over perovskite oxide catalysts [J]. Chinese Journal of Catalysis, 2023, 50(7): 109-125. |
[11] | Jiao Wang, Fangfang Zhu, Biyi Chen, Shuang Deng, Bochen Hu, Hong Liu, Meng Wu, Jinhui Hao, Longhua Li, Weidong Shi. B atom dopant-manipulate electronic structure of CuIn nanoalloy delivering wide potential activity over electrochemical CO2RR [J]. Chinese Journal of Catalysis, 2023, 49(6): 132-140. |
[12] | Cheng-Feng Du, Erhai Hu, Hong Yu, Qingyu Yan. Strategies for local electronic structure engineering of two-dimensional electrocatalysts [J]. Chinese Journal of Catalysis, 2023, 48(5): 1-14. |
[13] | Runze Liu, Xue Shao, Chang Wang, Weili Dai, Naijia Guan. Reaction mechanism of methanol-to-hydrocarbons conversion: Fundamental and application [J]. Chinese Journal of Catalysis, 2023, 47(4): 67-92. |
[14] | Qi-Ni Zhan, Ting-Yu Shuai, Hui-Min Xu, Chen-Jin Huang, Zhi-Jie Zhang, Gao-Ren Li. Syntheses and applications of single-atom catalysts for electrochemical energy conversion reactions [J]. Chinese Journal of Catalysis, 2023, 47(4): 32-66. |
[15] | Dan-Qing Liu, Bingxing Zhang, Guoqiang Zhao, Jian Chen, Hongge Pan, Wenping Sun. Advanced in-situ electrochemical scanning probe microscopies in electrocatalysis [J]. Chinese Journal of Catalysis, 2023, 47(4): 93-120. |
Viewed | ||||||
Full text |
|
|||||
Abstract |
|
|||||