Chinese Journal of Catalysis ›› 2026, Vol. 85: 47-87.DOI: 10.1016/S1872-2067(26)65021-8
• Reviews • Previous Articles Next Articles
Received:2025-09-29
Accepted:2025-11-24
Online:2026-06-18
Published:2026-05-18
Contact:
*E-mail: yu.fang@fjirsm.ac.cn (Y. Fang).About author:Yu Fang (Fujian Institute of Research on the Structure of Matter, Chinese Academy of Sciences) earned his M.S. degree in 2010 from Shanghai Jiao Tong University under the supervision of Professor Yong Cui, and his Ph.D. in 2014 from the University of Tokyo under the guidance of Professor Makoto Fujita. He then conducted postdoctoral research at the University of Tokyo (2014-2015) and later at Texas A&M University (2015-2019), where he worked with Professor Hong-Cai Zhou. In 2019, he returned to China to join the College of Chemistry and Chemical Engineering at Hunan University as a full professor, before moving to his current position at the Fujian Institute of Research on the Structure of Matter (FJIRSM), Chinese Academy of Sciences in 2025.His research focuses on coordination-driven supramolecular self-assembly, with an emphasis on the rational design and synthesis of porous functional materials—such as porous coordination cages (PCCs), metal-organic frameworks (MOFs), and covalent organic frameworks (COFs). He aims to precisely modulate the properties of these materials for applications in energy storage and conversion, catalysis, and biomedical science. Professor Fang has authored numerous publications in high-impact journals including Nature Communications, J. Am. Chem. Soc., Angew. Chem. Int. Ed., with several papers recognized as Highly Cited. He also serves as a Youth Editorial Board Member for Chinese Chemical Lettersand holds several other academic roles.
Jiaying Liu, Yu Fang. Unraveling structure-activity relationships in 2-D covalent organic frameworks for photocatalysis: From molecular engineering to high-performance optimization[J]. Chinese Journal of Catalysis, 2026, 85: 47-87.
Add to citation manager EndNote|Ris|BibTeX
URL: https://www.cjcatal.com/EN/10.1016/S1872-2067(26)65021-8
Fig. 1. (A) COFs bearing azole linkages: Synthetic routes, D-π-A models, and variations. Reprinted with permission from Ref. [52]. Copyright 2023, Wiley. (B) The scheme for the synthesis of H-COF and ODA-COF. Reprinted with permission from Ref. [76]. Copyright 2022, Wiley.
Fig. 2. (A) The design of the three β-ketoenamine COFs with different linker lengths, transient photocurrents and comparison of conversions. Reprinted with permission from Ref. [42]. Copyright 2023, Elsevier. (B) Preparation routes of COFs, steady-state PL spectra of the COF samples, and photocatalytic H2O2 generation under O2 atmosphere in water. Reprinted with permission from Ref. [94]. Copyright 2024, Wiley.
Fig. 3. (A) Nonplanar CTC-COFs: Synthesis, CTC-COF-AB/AA crystal structure views (top/side/front), and optical properties (UV-vis DRS, fluores-cence spectra). Reprinted with permission from Ref. [103]. Copyright 2025, Elsevier. (B) TpbTfb-COF/TroTfb-COF: Synthetic schemes, localized charge distribution, eclipsed adjacent layer stacking, and spectro-scopic/photoelectric properties. Reprinted with permission from Ref. [105]. Copyright 2025, Wiley. (C) Synthesis and structure, time-dependent CO/H2 production, rate comparison, and CO yield/selectivity. Reprinted with permission from Ref. [104]. Copyright 2025, Elsevier.
| Type | Catalyst | Connection | Yield/Activity | Light source |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Linking mode regulation | TZ-COF | thiazole linking | 3.82 μA·cm-2; τ = 5.94 ps; 268 μmol·g-1·h-1 | λ ≤ 800 nm |
| OZ-COF | oxazole linking | 1.26 μA·cm-2; τ = 3.74ps; 220 μmol·g-1·h-1 | λ ≤ 800 nm | |
| IZ-COF | imidazole linking | 0.63 μA·cm-2; τ = 1.8 ps; 102 μmol·g-1·h-1 (H2O2) | λ ≤ 800 nm | |
| H-COF | imine bond | 609 μmol·g-1·h-1 (H2) | λ ≤ 450 nm | |
| ODA-COF | oxadiazole | 2615 μmol·g-1·h-1 (H2) | λ ≤ 800 nm | |
| Pore structure regulation | TpPa-COF | β-ketoenamine COF, short linker | benzylamine oxidation yield 21% | λ ≤ 600 nm |
| TpBD-COF | β-ketoenamine COF, medium linker | benzylamine oxidation yield 78% | λ ≤ 600 nm | |
| TpDT-COF | β-ketoenamine COF, long linker | benzylamine oxidation yield 61% | λ ≤ 600 nm | |
| COF-O | pore alkyl chains + O-substitution | τ = 1.5 ns; 15 μmol·h-1 (H2O2) | λ ≤ 550 nm | |
| COF-C | pore alkyl chains | τ = 1.4 ns; 7.5 μmol·h-1 (H2O2) | λ ≤ 550 nm | |
| Interlayer stacking regulation | TroTfb-COF | Tro backbone with carbonyl (C=O) | τ = 0.91 ns; thioanisole oxidation yield: 98% | λ ≤ 800 nm |
| TpbTfb-COF | no carbonyl modification | τ = 0.087 ns; thioanisole oxidation yield: 10% | λ ≤460 nm | |
| CTC-COF-AA | AA stacking | τ = 0.54 ns; 0.95 μmol·g-1·h-1 (H2) | λ ≤600 nm | |
| CTC-COF-AB | AB stacking | τ = 3.42 ns; 113.6 μmol·g-1·h-1 (H2) | λ ≤ 800 nm | |
| Co-SACs@COF-TzBpy | interlayer charge channels | 8101 μmol·g-1·h-1 (CO); sel.: 97.4% | λ ≤ 800 nm | |
| COF-TzBpy | no cobalt single atoms/channels | 218 μmol·g-1·h-1 (CO) | λ ≤ 800 nm | |
| JNM-7-AA | AA stacking | 87% (CDC) | λ ≤ 1000 nm | |
| JNM-7-ABC | ABC stacking | 1% (CDC) | λ ≤ 800 nm | |
| JNM-8-AA | AA stacking | 99% (CDC) | λ ≤ 1000 nm | |
| JNM-8-ABC | ABC stacking | 20% (CDC) | 87% (CDC) |
Table 3 Comparative analysis of structural design in COFs for enhanced photocatalytic performance.
| Type | Catalyst | Connection | Yield/Activity | Light source |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Linking mode regulation | TZ-COF | thiazole linking | 3.82 μA·cm-2; τ = 5.94 ps; 268 μmol·g-1·h-1 | λ ≤ 800 nm |
| OZ-COF | oxazole linking | 1.26 μA·cm-2; τ = 3.74ps; 220 μmol·g-1·h-1 | λ ≤ 800 nm | |
| IZ-COF | imidazole linking | 0.63 μA·cm-2; τ = 1.8 ps; 102 μmol·g-1·h-1 (H2O2) | λ ≤ 800 nm | |
| H-COF | imine bond | 609 μmol·g-1·h-1 (H2) | λ ≤ 450 nm | |
| ODA-COF | oxadiazole | 2615 μmol·g-1·h-1 (H2) | λ ≤ 800 nm | |
| Pore structure regulation | TpPa-COF | β-ketoenamine COF, short linker | benzylamine oxidation yield 21% | λ ≤ 600 nm |
| TpBD-COF | β-ketoenamine COF, medium linker | benzylamine oxidation yield 78% | λ ≤ 600 nm | |
| TpDT-COF | β-ketoenamine COF, long linker | benzylamine oxidation yield 61% | λ ≤ 600 nm | |
| COF-O | pore alkyl chains + O-substitution | τ = 1.5 ns; 15 μmol·h-1 (H2O2) | λ ≤ 550 nm | |
| COF-C | pore alkyl chains | τ = 1.4 ns; 7.5 μmol·h-1 (H2O2) | λ ≤ 550 nm | |
| Interlayer stacking regulation | TroTfb-COF | Tro backbone with carbonyl (C=O) | τ = 0.91 ns; thioanisole oxidation yield: 98% | λ ≤ 800 nm |
| TpbTfb-COF | no carbonyl modification | τ = 0.087 ns; thioanisole oxidation yield: 10% | λ ≤460 nm | |
| CTC-COF-AA | AA stacking | τ = 0.54 ns; 0.95 μmol·g-1·h-1 (H2) | λ ≤600 nm | |
| CTC-COF-AB | AB stacking | τ = 3.42 ns; 113.6 μmol·g-1·h-1 (H2) | λ ≤ 800 nm | |
| Co-SACs@COF-TzBpy | interlayer charge channels | 8101 μmol·g-1·h-1 (CO); sel.: 97.4% | λ ≤ 800 nm | |
| COF-TzBpy | no cobalt single atoms/channels | 218 μmol·g-1·h-1 (CO) | λ ≤ 800 nm | |
| JNM-7-AA | AA stacking | 87% (CDC) | λ ≤ 1000 nm | |
| JNM-7-ABC | ABC stacking | 1% (CDC) | λ ≤ 800 nm | |
| JNM-8-AA | AA stacking | 99% (CDC) | λ ≤ 1000 nm | |
| JNM-8-ABC | ABC stacking | 20% (CDC) | 87% (CDC) |
Fig. 4. (A-D) PXRD patterns of TAPB-TaBr2 COF synthesized in n-BuOH with variation of the water content, acid content, temperature, and time. (E) Optical microscopy images and photographs of TAPB-TaBr2 during synthesis in n-butanol or methanol at different points in time. The white bar is 1 mm. Reprinted with permission from Ref. [105]. Copyright 2024, Wiley.
Fig. 5. Comparison between COF synthesis methods and the conventional solvothermal method. (A) Conventional solvothermal synthetic approach. (B) The organic flux synthesis method. (C) Imide-linked COF monomers used in this study. (D) The structures of imide-linked COFs. Reprinted with permission from Ref. [109]. Copyright 2024, Springer Nature.
Fig. 6. Schematic of D-A TzPm-COF synthesis via microwave assistance. Reaction duration: seconds to minutes. Time dependent morphology of TzPm-COF synthesized in different time scale. Reprinted with permission from Ref. [112]. Copyright 2024, Wiley.
Fig. 7. (A) Ball-milling-assisted acid-catalyzed imine formation for the synthesis of COFs; experimental, Pawley-refined and simulated PXRD patterns (AA stacking) and difference plots. Reprinted with permission from Ref. [115]. Copyright 2025, The Royal Society of Chemistry. (B) Synthesis of COF and PXRD diffraction and space-filling model of TAPT-TA-COF and TAPT-BPA-COF. Reprinted with permission from Ref. [116]. Copyright 2025, Wiley.
Fig. 8. (A) Synthetic scheme of the room-temperature synthesis of vinyl-linked COFs and STM images of a 2D-SAMN. Reprinted with permission from Ref. [118]. Copyright 2023, American Chemical Society. (B) Schematic representation of the different DFTAPB-TFTA-COF polymorphs. Reprinted with permission from Ref. [119]. Copyright 2025, Wiley.
Fig. 9. (A) Synthetic routes of pristine/modified COFs, UV-vis DRS and Tauc plots. Reprinted with permission from Ref. [121]. Copyright 2023, Elsevier. (B) Synthetic scheme of COFs, UV-vis DRS and valence band XPS. Reprinted with permission from Ref. [122]. Copyright 2025, Elsevier.
Fig. 10. (A) Three structurally functionalized COFs: design, synthesis, and investigations on decay kinetics, electron-hole distribution, and charge density difference of Br-, Me-, and Ph-COF. Reprinted with permission from Ref. [124]. Copyright 2024, Elsevier. (B) PXRD patterns of H-, COOH- and SO3H-COF, Zeta-potentials of H-, COOH- and SO3H-COF, PL spec-tra H-, COOH- and SO3H-COF with the excitation wavelength of 400 nm. TRPL decay curves. Reprinted with permission from Ref. [125]. Copyright 2024, Wiley. (C) Synthesis and structures schematics of catalysts, EIS spectra, TR-PL decay profiles and COF energy band schematic. Reprinted with permission from Ref. [126]. Copyright 2025, Elsevier.
Fig. 11. (A) Schematic illustration of COOH-COF, TP-COF, and AOCOF, HAADF-STEM of Co-COF, Transient photocurrent responses of Co-COF, COOH-COF, TP-COF, and AOCOF, Normalized time-resolved PL decay curves. Reprinted with permission from Ref. [131]. Copyright 2025, Wiley. (B) Schematic illustration of synthesis of Cu3-BPY-COF(Ru/Co)-X and eclipsed AA stacking model of Cu3-BPY-COF(Ru/Co)-X. Reprinted with permission from Ref. [132,133]. Copyright 2025, Wiley.
Fig. 16. (A) Construction and physicochemical attributes of the COF series (H, OH, 2OH): synthesis illustration, surface charge density derived from transient photocurrent and dipole moment. Reprinted with permission from Ref. [207]. Copyright 2025, American Chemical Society. (B) In-situ FT-IR spectra of CO2 photoreduction on Cu3-BPY-COF(Ru/Co)-2 and (Ru), and free energy of CO/CH4 pathway on Co/Cu catalytic sites. Reprinted with permission from Ref. [132]. Copyright 2025, Wiley. (C) COFs@Co’s ΔG profiles for CO2 photoreduction to CO and CO2 photoreduction mechanism. Reprinted with permission from Ref. [208]. Copyright 2025, Wiley.
Fig. 17. (A) Trinuclear Cu framework controllable synthesis scheme, U(VI) dark/visible-light removal ratios, and EPR spectra. Reprinted with permission from Ref. [209]. Copyright 2024, Wiley-VCH Verlag. (B) BTz/BT-COF AA-stacked PXRD patterns, steady-state fluorescence spectra post-photocatalysis with varied U(VI) concentrations, bare vs. U-captured BTz-COF transient photocurrent, and BTz-COF’s photocatalytic mechanism. Reprinted with permission from Ref. [211]. Copyright 2025, Elsevier.
Fig. 18. (A) COFs’ real-space hole/electron distributions, electrostatic potential surface, free energy profile, PTHSO2-COF’s photocatalytic H2O2 syn-thesis via ORR pathways, and 2e- two-step ORR and 4e- WOR pathway diagrams. Reprinted with permission from Ref. [214]. Copyright 2025, Wiley. (B) Protonation of the COFs for H2O2 production (40 mL, 10 mg of COF), The performance of HITMS-COF-20H+ and HITMS-COF-21H+ compared with other representative photocatalysts. Reprinted with permission from Ref. [66]. Copyright 2025, American Chemical Society. (C) Hirshfeld charge distribution of COF-BD1/BD2 (gray, blue, red, white spheres denote C, N, O, H atoms respectively), surface ESP maps of COF-BD1/BD2, in XPS spectra of COF-BD2, and in situ ESR spectra of the two COFs. Reprinted with permission from Ref. [215]. Copyright 2025, Wiley.
Fig. 19. (A) Suggested mechanism of C-H bond activation in this research. Reprinted with permission from Ref. [220]. Copyright 2023, Wiley. (B) Urea-COF/Biph-COF synthesis and characterization, Urea-COF PL spectra with/without DHAA, soaked Urea-COF vs. pristine Urea-COF/DHAA FT-IR spectra, and Urea-COF photocatalytic dihydroartemisinic ac-id-to-artemisinin conversion schematic. Reprinted with permission from Ref. [220]. Copyright 2025, Wiley.
Fig. 20. (A) Cu2+/COF-catalyzed β-lactam antibiotic photothermal hydrolysis-decarboxylation schematic, PG (C0 = 1 mmol·L-1)/PAA conc. PG (C0 = 0.1 mmol·L-1) degradation efficacy by Cu2+/COF, PG degradation rates of COF, Cu2+ and catalyst-free system, and PG degradation kinetics of Cu2+/COF dispersion. Reprinted with permission from Ref. [221]. Copyright 2023, National Academy of Sciences. (B) Photocatalytic NH4+ formation over as-prepared samples, Pd2+@Tp-TAPT photocatalytic NH4+ yield for cycling stability, its AQE in N2 fixation, control assays, post-N2-fixation 1H NMR spectra of reaction solutions, and in-situ FT-IR spectra. Reprinted with permission from Ref. [222]. Copyright 2024, Wiley.
Fig. 21. (A) Measured electronic band alignments of the acid-treated COF variants. Reprinted with permission from Ref. [241]. Copyright 2025, Wiley. (B) COF-JLUs UV-vis DRS spectra, Tauc plots, COF-JLU45 Mott-Schottky plots, COF-JLUs band structure schematic, their photocatalytic H2 evolution under visible light and AM 1.5, and COF-JLU45 photocata-lytic H2 evolution profiles with varied dosages. Reprinted with permission from Ref. [229]. Copyright 2025, Wiley. (C) The PL spectra results (λex = 420 nm) and photocatalytic performances of C2-COF and C2-COF-BF2. Reprinted with permission from Ref. [242]. Copyright 2025, Science China Press.
| Catalyst | Light source | Yield/Activity | Τ (ns) |
|---|---|---|---|
| OH-COF | λ ≤ 600 nm | 154 μmol·g-1·h-1 (CO) | 2.78 |
| H-COF | λ ≤ 500 nm | 37 μmol·g-1·h-1 (CO) | 1.04 |
| 2OH-COF | λ ≤ 650 nm | 41 μmol·g-1·h-1 (CO) | 1.45 |
| Cu3-BPY-COF(Ru/Co)-2 | 400 ≤ λ ≤ 800 nm | 31.5 μmol·g-1·h-1 (CH₄) | — |
| Cu3-BPY-COF(Ru/Co)-1 | 400 ≤ λ ≤ 800 nm | 9 μmol·g-1·h-1 (CH₄) | — |
| Cu3-BPY-COF(Ru/Co)-3 | 400 ≤ λ ≤ 800 nm | 14.3 μmol·g-1·h-1 (CH₄) | — |
| Cu₃-BPY-COF(Ru) | 400 ≤ λ ≤ 800 nm | 2.1 μmol·g-1·h-1 (CH₄) | — |
| COF-E@Co | λ ≤ 800 nm | 21.74 mmol·g-1·h-1 (CO) | 0.2 |
| COF-M@Co | λ ≤ 800 nm | ≈14.2 mmol·g-1·h-1 (CO) | — |
| COF-B@Co | λ ≤ 800 nm | ≈13.4 mmol·g-1·h-1 (CO) | — |
| COF-B | λ ≤ 800 nm | ≈ 0 (CO) | 0.28 |
| COF-M | λ ≤ 800 nm | ≈ 0 (CO) | 0.38 |
| COF-E | λ ≤ 800 nm | ≈ 0 (CO) | 0.32 |
| Cu3-PA-COF-AA | λ ≤ 800 nm | 93.6%(U(VI)) | 3.96 |
| Cu3-PA-COF-ABC | λ ≤ 800 nm | 42.0%(U(VI)) | 3.74 |
| BTz-COF | λ ≤ 800 nm | 34.53 μmol·h-1 (U(VI)) | 0.72 |
| BT-COF | λ ≤ 800 nm | 2.85 μmol·h-1 (U(VI)) | 0.58 |
| PTH-SO2-COF | λ ≤ 800 nm | 7755 μmol·g-1·h-1 (H2O2) | 1.57 |
| PTH-S-COF | λ ≤ 800 nm | 1077 μmol·g-1·h-1(H2O2) | 1.55 |
| HITMS-COF-20H⁺ | λ ≤ 750 nm | 1957 μmol·g-1·h-1(H2O2) | — |
| HITMS-COF-20 | λ ≤ 540 nm | 452 μmol·g-1·h-1 (H2O2) | 0.66 |
| HITMS-COF-21H⁺ | λ ≤ 760 nm | 1315 μmol·g-1·h-1 (H2O2) | — |
| HITMS-COF-21 | λ ≤ 550 nm | 391 μmol·g-1-1·h-1 (H2O2) | 0.37 |
| COF-BD2 | λ ≤ 8 00 nm | 5211 μmol·g-1·h-1 (H2O2) | 4.14 ps |
| COF-BD1 | λ ≤ 800 nm | 3065 μmol·g-1·h-1 (H2O2) | 3.73 ps |
| Cu2+/Py-Bpy-COF | λ ≤ 800 nm | 1mmo·L-1 antibiotic: complete hydrolysis (10 min) | 2.57 ps |
| Pd2+@Tp-TAPT | λ ≤ 800 nm | 10 × 10-6 phenol: 99.9% degradation (15 min) | 4.02 |
| Tp-TAPT | λ ≤ 800 nm | 10 × 10-6 phenol: 99.9% degradation (58 min) | 1.54 |
| N-BT_F-ac | λ ≤ 800 nm | 14.0 mmol·h-1·g-1 (H2) | 2.85 |
| N-BT_H-ac | λ ≤ 800 nm | 10.1 mmol h-1·g-1 (H2) | 2.40 |
| C-BT_F-ac | λ ≤ 800 nm | 6.8 mmol h-1·g-1 (H2) | 6.76 |
| N-BT_2F-ac | λ ≤ 800 nm | 8.0 mmol h-1·g-1 (H2) | 3.28 |
| COF-JLU45 | λ ≤ 800 nm | 216.9 mmol·g-1·h-1 (H2) | 2.26 |
| COF-JLU44 | λ ≤ 800 nm | 24.0 mmol·g-1·h-1 (H2) | 1.66 |
| C2-COF-BF | λ ≤ 700 nm | 20 μmol·h-1·mg-1 (H2) | 1.12 |
| C2-COF | λ ≤ 600 nm | 6.5 μmol·h-1·mg-1 (H2) | 0.9 |
| NQ-COF E5-O | λ ≤ 800 nm | model reaction: 93% | 4.1 |
| NQ-COF | λ ≤ 800 nm | model reaction: 14% | 10.2 |
| Urea-COF | λ ≤ 800 nm | drug synthesis: 71% | — |
| Biph-COF | λ ≤ 800 nm | drug synthesis: 9% | — |
Table 4 Assessment of the catalytic efficacy of 2-D COF-based materials.
| Catalyst | Light source | Yield/Activity | Τ (ns) |
|---|---|---|---|
| OH-COF | λ ≤ 600 nm | 154 μmol·g-1·h-1 (CO) | 2.78 |
| H-COF | λ ≤ 500 nm | 37 μmol·g-1·h-1 (CO) | 1.04 |
| 2OH-COF | λ ≤ 650 nm | 41 μmol·g-1·h-1 (CO) | 1.45 |
| Cu3-BPY-COF(Ru/Co)-2 | 400 ≤ λ ≤ 800 nm | 31.5 μmol·g-1·h-1 (CH₄) | — |
| Cu3-BPY-COF(Ru/Co)-1 | 400 ≤ λ ≤ 800 nm | 9 μmol·g-1·h-1 (CH₄) | — |
| Cu3-BPY-COF(Ru/Co)-3 | 400 ≤ λ ≤ 800 nm | 14.3 μmol·g-1·h-1 (CH₄) | — |
| Cu₃-BPY-COF(Ru) | 400 ≤ λ ≤ 800 nm | 2.1 μmol·g-1·h-1 (CH₄) | — |
| COF-E@Co | λ ≤ 800 nm | 21.74 mmol·g-1·h-1 (CO) | 0.2 |
| COF-M@Co | λ ≤ 800 nm | ≈14.2 mmol·g-1·h-1 (CO) | — |
| COF-B@Co | λ ≤ 800 nm | ≈13.4 mmol·g-1·h-1 (CO) | — |
| COF-B | λ ≤ 800 nm | ≈ 0 (CO) | 0.28 |
| COF-M | λ ≤ 800 nm | ≈ 0 (CO) | 0.38 |
| COF-E | λ ≤ 800 nm | ≈ 0 (CO) | 0.32 |
| Cu3-PA-COF-AA | λ ≤ 800 nm | 93.6%(U(VI)) | 3.96 |
| Cu3-PA-COF-ABC | λ ≤ 800 nm | 42.0%(U(VI)) | 3.74 |
| BTz-COF | λ ≤ 800 nm | 34.53 μmol·h-1 (U(VI)) | 0.72 |
| BT-COF | λ ≤ 800 nm | 2.85 μmol·h-1 (U(VI)) | 0.58 |
| PTH-SO2-COF | λ ≤ 800 nm | 7755 μmol·g-1·h-1 (H2O2) | 1.57 |
| PTH-S-COF | λ ≤ 800 nm | 1077 μmol·g-1·h-1(H2O2) | 1.55 |
| HITMS-COF-20H⁺ | λ ≤ 750 nm | 1957 μmol·g-1·h-1(H2O2) | — |
| HITMS-COF-20 | λ ≤ 540 nm | 452 μmol·g-1·h-1 (H2O2) | 0.66 |
| HITMS-COF-21H⁺ | λ ≤ 760 nm | 1315 μmol·g-1·h-1 (H2O2) | — |
| HITMS-COF-21 | λ ≤ 550 nm | 391 μmol·g-1-1·h-1 (H2O2) | 0.37 |
| COF-BD2 | λ ≤ 8 00 nm | 5211 μmol·g-1·h-1 (H2O2) | 4.14 ps |
| COF-BD1 | λ ≤ 800 nm | 3065 μmol·g-1·h-1 (H2O2) | 3.73 ps |
| Cu2+/Py-Bpy-COF | λ ≤ 800 nm | 1mmo·L-1 antibiotic: complete hydrolysis (10 min) | 2.57 ps |
| Pd2+@Tp-TAPT | λ ≤ 800 nm | 10 × 10-6 phenol: 99.9% degradation (15 min) | 4.02 |
| Tp-TAPT | λ ≤ 800 nm | 10 × 10-6 phenol: 99.9% degradation (58 min) | 1.54 |
| N-BT_F-ac | λ ≤ 800 nm | 14.0 mmol·h-1·g-1 (H2) | 2.85 |
| N-BT_H-ac | λ ≤ 800 nm | 10.1 mmol h-1·g-1 (H2) | 2.40 |
| C-BT_F-ac | λ ≤ 800 nm | 6.8 mmol h-1·g-1 (H2) | 6.76 |
| N-BT_2F-ac | λ ≤ 800 nm | 8.0 mmol h-1·g-1 (H2) | 3.28 |
| COF-JLU45 | λ ≤ 800 nm | 216.9 mmol·g-1·h-1 (H2) | 2.26 |
| COF-JLU44 | λ ≤ 800 nm | 24.0 mmol·g-1·h-1 (H2) | 1.66 |
| C2-COF-BF | λ ≤ 700 nm | 20 μmol·h-1·mg-1 (H2) | 1.12 |
| C2-COF | λ ≤ 600 nm | 6.5 μmol·h-1·mg-1 (H2) | 0.9 |
| NQ-COF E5-O | λ ≤ 800 nm | model reaction: 93% | 4.1 |
| NQ-COF | λ ≤ 800 nm | model reaction: 14% | 10.2 |
| Urea-COF | λ ≤ 800 nm | drug synthesis: 71% | — |
| Biph-COF | λ ≤ 800 nm | drug synthesis: 9% | — |
|
| [1] | Polina Lavrik, Jurjen Cazemier, Mohamed N. Hedhili, Sudheesh K. Veeranmaril, Abdallah Nassereddine, Antonio Aguilar-Tapia, Marina Chernova, Jean-Louis Hazemann, Alla Dikhtiarenko, Javier Ruiz-Martínez. Relationship between palladium nuclearity and catalytic activity and selectivity in acetylene semi-hydrogenation [J]. Chinese Journal of Catalysis, 2026, 85(6): 384-393. |
| [2] | Jingyao Wu, Yujing Lv, Qiang Zhao, Shuo Wang, Ying Wang, Na Wen, Zhengxin Ding, Zizhong Zhang, Jinlin Long. Electron-proton duet in covalent organic frameworks for efficient direct oxygen reduction to hydrogen peroxide [J]. Chinese Journal of Catalysis, 2026, 84(5): 288-300. |
| [3] | Zhiyao Liu, Tangkang Liu, Chuan Qin, Guoliang Liu, Anmin Zheng. Zirconia-mediated interfacial catalysis for CO2 hydrogenation [J]. Chinese Journal of Catalysis, 2026, 84(5): 1-24. |
| [4] | Yu Gu, Shujia Zhang, Minglu Xu, Hao Yan, Minghao Zhou, Lei Wang, Hui Shi. Dehydroaromatization of methane and methane co-aromatization process with propane: Reaction mechanism, catalyst design, carbon deposition and process optimization [J]. Chinese Journal of Catalysis, 2026, 84(5): 25-60. |
| [5] | Haifeng Fan, Di Xu, Ting Zeng, Guoqiang Hou, Yangyang Li, Siyi Huang, Yanfei Xu, Zheng Wang, Xinhua Gao, Xiang-Kui Gu, Mingyue Ding. Highly efficient electron-enriched Y2O3‒x-Ni interfaces boosting low-temperature CO2 methanation [J]. Chinese Journal of Catalysis, 2026, 84(5): 200-213. |
| [6] | Yong Zhang, Wenjun Zhu, Yanyan Zhao, Shumin Zhang. In2S3/HOF S-scheme heterojunction for enhanced photocatalytic H2O2 production [J]. Chinese Journal of Catalysis, 2026, 84(5): 261-273. |
| [7] | Ke-Hui Xie, Cong-Xue Liu, Yan Geng, Jing-Lan Kan, Guang-Bo Wang, Yu-Bin Dong. Efficient H2O2 photosynthesis through linker engineering of benzotrithiophene-based covalent organic frameworks [J]. Chinese Journal of Catalysis, 2026, 83(4): 271-281. |
| [8] | Donghua Li, Hongyin Hu, Jinye Zhou, Hanyun Miao, Yu Wu, Jinyan Wang, Baochun Guo, Mingliang Du, Shuanglong Lu. Steering product selectivity via metallic site-dependent pathways in porphyrin-based covalent organic frameworks for electrocatalytic nitrite reduction [J]. Chinese Journal of Catalysis, 2026, 83(4): 258-270. |
| [9] | Wenao Xie, Zhifang Jia, Chang Shu, Tingxia Wang, Jianhong Xi, Jiaxuan Cai, Xiangyang Song, Yu Che, Xiaoyan Wang, Kewei Wang, Bien Tan. Cyano-functionalized covalent organic frameworks for enhanced photocatalytic hydrogen peroxide production via microenvironment engineering [J]. Chinese Journal of Catalysis, 2026, 83(4): 282-293. |
| [10] | Rumeng Zhang, Muke Lin, Yimu Jiao, Cheng Chen, Mengling Hu, Hao Zhou, Dehua Xia. Fe(III)-mediated self-sustaining photo-Fenton system on metal-free pyridine-COF: Interfacial electron transfer for water purification [J]. Chinese Journal of Catalysis, 2026, 82(3): 225-237. |
| [11] | Bolin Yang, Fei Jin, Zhiliang Jin. Efficient photocatalytic hydrogen production by a heterojunction strategy with covalent organic frameworks loaded with non-precious-metal semiconductors [J]. Chinese Journal of Catalysis, 2026, 81(2): 172-184. |
| [12] | Qinghua Liu, Peiqing Cai, Hengshuai Li, Xue-Yang Ji, Dafeng Zhang, Xipeng Pu. Visible-light-driven hydrogen evolution over CdS/CuWO4 S-Scheme heterojunctions: Dual synergistic enhancement via interfacial charge transfer and photothermal activation [J]. Chinese Journal of Catalysis, 2026, 81(2): 299-309. |
| [13] | Jiaping Lu, Chao Lin, Chao Li, Hongjie Shi, Nengyi Liu, Wandong Xing, Sibo Wang, Guigang Zhang, Teng-Teng Chen, Xiong Chen. Bipyridine-integrated bisoxazole-based donor-acceptor covalent organic framework for enhanced photocatalytic H2O2 synthesis [J]. Chinese Journal of Catalysis, 2026, 81(2): 185-194. |
| [14] | Fan Dang, Chunli Ai, Chi Ma, Zeyu Jiang, Jicheng Liu, Mingjiao Tian, Mingzhuo Zhang, Chi He. Advances in metal oxide catalysts for efficient VOCs oxidation: Synthesis strategy and catalytic mechanism [J]. Chinese Journal of Catalysis, 2026, 81(2): 97-123. |
| [15] | Shaodan Wang, Heng Yang, Lijun Xue, Jianjun Zhang, Shuxin Ouyang, Lili Wen. S-scheme heterojunctions of metal-doped ZnIn2S4/TpPa-1: Regulating H adsorption/desorption and internal electric field for boosted dual-functional photocatalysis [J]. Chinese Journal of Catalysis, 2026, 80(1): 159-173. |
| Viewed | ||||||
|
Full text |
|
|||||
|
Abstract |
|
|||||
