隧道限域与淬火锚定协同构筑原子级分散Cu/MnO2催化剂用于高效催化氧化

doi:10.1016/S1872-2067(26)65177-7

催化学报 ›› 2026, Vol. 89: 477-490.DOI: 10.1016/S1872-2067(26)65177-7

• 论文 • 上一篇

隧道限域与淬火锚定协同构筑原子级分散Cu/MnO₂催化剂用于高效催化氧化

杨金^a, 林家瑾^a, 叶常春^b, 李逸飞^a, 刘淑敏^a, 张改革^a, 刘圣杰^c, 陈光需^a^,^*()

^a华南理工大学环境与能源学院,国家挥发性有机物污染控制工程技术实验室, 广东省大气环境与污染控制重点实验室,广东广州 510006
^b广东工业大学材料与能源学院,广东广州 510006
^c厦门大学化学与化学工程学院,福建厦门 361005

收稿日期:2026-02-27 接受日期:2026-04-28 出版日期:2026-10-18 发布日期:2026-09-01
通讯作者: *电子信箱: cgx08@scut.edu.cn (陈光需).
基金资助:
中国国家重点研发计划(2024YFC3908700);中国国家重点研发计划(2024YFA1509500);广东省基础与应用基础研究基金(2025A1515010458);广东省创新创业研究团队项目(2019ZT08L075);广东省珠江人才计划(2019QN01L159);国家自然科学基金(22508065)

Tunnel-confined and quenching-anchored atomic Cu in transition metal oxides for efficient catalytic oxidation

Jin Yang^a, Jiajin Lin^a, Changchun Ye^b, Yifei Li^a, Shumin Liu^a, Gaige Zhang^a, Shengjie Liu^c, Guangxu Chen^a^,^*()

^aSchool of Environment and Energy,National Engineering Laboratory for VOCs Pollution Control Technology and Equipment, Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Atmospheric Environment and Pollution Control, South China University of Technology, Guangzhou 510006, Guangdong, China
^bSchool of Materials and Energy, Guangdong University of Technology, Guangzhou 510006, Guangdong, China
^cCollege of Chemistry and Chemical Engineering, Xiamen University, Xiamen 361005, Fujian, China

Received:2026-02-27 Accepted:2026-04-28 Online:2026-10-18 Published:2026-09-01
Contact: *E-mail:cgx08@scut.edu.cn(G. Chen).
Supported by:
National Key Research and Development Program of China(2024YFC3908700);National Key Research and Development Program of China(2024YFA1509500);Guangdong Basic and Applied Basic Research Foundation(2025A1515010458);Guangdong Innovative and Entrepreneurial Research Team Program(2019ZT08L075);Guangdong Pearl River Talent Program(2019QN01L159);National Natural Science Foundation of China(22508065)

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

负载型金属催化剂是多相催化体系中的重要组成部分, 但在保持金属原子高度分散的同时实现高负载量和高可及活性位点密度, 仍是该领域面临的关键挑战. 热冲击/淬火策略可通过快速冷却抑制金属物种迁移与团聚, 为构筑高分散金属催化剂提供了有效途径. 然而, 传统金属氧化物载体多具有紧密堆积或刚性晶格结构, 外源金属物种通常只能锚定于表面或近表面区域, 难以充分利用载体内部晶格空间, 导致金属负载量和有效活性位点数量受限.

针对这一问题, 本文提出一种“淬火快速成核—隧道限域锚定”协同策略, 利用α-MnO₂的一维2×2隧道结构为金属原子提供载体内部新增锚定位点, 成功构筑了高密度、抗团聚的原子级分散Cu修饰MnO₂催化剂(MnO₂-QCu). 该催化剂的Cu负载量达到2.6 wt%, 显著高于传统淬火负载型氧化物催化剂. 结构表征结果表明, 淬火过程不仅促进Cu物种在MnO₂表面取代Mn位点, 还进一步激活α-MnO₂隧道内部空间, 使孤立Cu物种以Cu-O-Mn配位结构稳定嵌入MnO₂框架中. 同时, 快速热收缩诱导的晶格畸变和氧空位形成了丰富的Cu-V_O-Mn界面, 调控了局域电子结构, 提高了晶格氧迁移能力和分子氧活化能力. 在CO氧化反应中, MnO₂-QCu表现出优异的低温催化活性和湿态稳定性, 在含水条件下连续运行100 h仍保持稳定转化能力. 机理研究表明, α-MnO₂隧道可作为亚纳米限域反应空间, 提高CO/O₂与活性位点之间的有效相互作用; 同时, Cu-V_O-Mn界面能够协同活化分子氧与晶格氧, 使CO氧化在低温下主要通过Eley-Rideal-like路径加速进行, 并由Mars-van Krevelen路径维持晶格氧循环和界面稳定. 与传统浸渍法制备的Cu/MnO₂催化剂相比, MnO₂-QCu有效避免了稳定碳酸盐物种的积累, 从而降低反应能垒并提升持续催化能力. 此外, 该策略可拓展至Ag, Mg和Ni等多种金属物种的负载, 显示出良好的普适性.

综上, 本研究揭示了隧道结构金属氧化物在激活内部晶格空间、稳定高负载原子级金属物种和构筑高效界面活性位点方面的独特优势, 为高性能负载型金属氧化物催化剂的理性设计提供了新思路. 该类催化剂在汽车尾气净化、挥发性有机物治理及其他低温氧化反应中具有潜在应用价值.

关键词: 原子级分散催化剂, 高负载量, 淬火策略, 隧道结构的二氧化锰, 一氧化碳氧化

Abstract:

Atomic-level dispersed metal catalysts have garnered considerable attention in heterogeneous catalysis due to their ultrahigh atomic efficiency, exceptional catalytic activity, and well-defined active site structures. However, achieving complete atomic-level dispersion of non-precious metals at high mass loadings on metal oxide supports remains a significant challenge. Here, we report the synthesis of a catalyst with highly dispersed 2.6 wt% Cu species on the tunnel-structured α-MnO₂ (MnO₂-QCu) via a quenching strategy. This approach synergistically leverages the rapid nucleation characteristic of quenching and the confinement effect of the α-MnO₂ tunnel structure. Beyond the conventional approach to catalyst loading, the activated tunnel structure of α-MnO₂ can provide additional Cu anchoring sites, effectively increasing the number of accessible catalytically active sites. The resulting MnO₂-QCu exhibits superior activity in CO oxidation, outperforming most reported Mn-based catalysts, and demonstrates excellent durability over 100 h under humid conditions. Mechanistic studies reveal that MnO₂-QCu facilitates the dual activation of lattice and molecular oxygen, while the resulting Cu-V_O-Mn interfaces promote charge transfer and enhance O₂ adsorption and activation, thereby enabling efficient and stable catalytic oxidation. This work offers a general and feasible route to design high-loading single-atom catalysts on oxide supports for energy and environmental applications.

Key words: Atomic-level dispersed catalysts, High mass loading, Quenching strategy, Tunnel-structured MnO₂, CO oxidation

杨金, 林家瑾, 叶常春, 李逸飞, 刘淑敏, 张改革, 刘圣杰, 陈光需. 隧道限域与淬火锚定协同构筑原子级分散Cu/MnO₂催化剂用于高效催化氧化[J]. 催化学报, 2026, 89: 477-490.

Jin Yang, Jiajin Lin, Changchun Ye, Yifei Li, Shumin Liu, Gaige Zhang, Shengjie Liu, Guangxu Chen. Tunnel-confined and quenching-anchored atomic Cu in transition metal oxides for efficient catalytic oxidation[J]. Chinese Journal of Catalysis, 2026, 89: 477-490.

×
扫码分享

导出引用管理器 EndNote|Ris|BibTeX

链接本文: https://www.cjcatal.com/CN/10.1016/S1872-2067(26)65177-7

https://www.cjcatal.com/CN/Y2026/V89/I10/477

图/表 5

Fig. 1. Schematic illustration depicting variations in the anchoring sites of guest metal atoms during quenching, associated with different atomic packing configurations.

Fig. 2. (a) Schematic illustration of the synthesis process of MnO2-QCu via the quenching process. (b,c) TEM images of MnO2-QCu. (d) XRD patterns of pristine MnO2, MnO2-Qwater, and MnO2-QCu. (e) HAADF-STEM image of MnO2-QCu, along with IFFT images corresponding to the (211) I and (202) II lattice planes. (f) Aberration-corrected HAADF-STEM image of MnO2-QCu. (g) Intensity profiles extracted from the green and yellow dashed regions in (f). (h) HAADF-STEM image and corresponding EDX elemental mapping of Mn, O, Cu, and K in MnO2-QCu.

Fig. 3. (a) Raman spectra of MnO2, MnO2-Qwater, and MnO2-QCu. (b) EPR spectra of the corresponding catalysts. (c) High-resolution XPS spectra of the O 1s region of various catalysts. (d) Cu 2p XPS spectra of the MnO2-QCu. (e) The infrared Fourier transform spectroscopy of CO adsorption on MnO2 and MnO2-QCu catalysts at 5000 Pa, respectively. XPS spectra of Mn 2p (f) and Mn 3s (g) for MnO2, MnO2-Qwater, and MnO2-QCu. (h) Normalized Mn K-edge XANES spectra, with reference fingerprints indicating different Mn oxidation states. (i) EXAFS spectra of Mn K-edge, highlighting local coordination environments around Mn. (j) Normalized Cu K-edge XANES spectra of MnO2-QCu compared with reference compounds (Cu foil, Cu2O, and CuO). (k) EXAFS spectra at the Cu K-edge, revealing the local structure of Cu species in MnO2-QCu.

Fig. 4. (a) Light-off curves for the CO oxidation reaction over MnO2, MnO2-Qwater, and MnO2-QCu. (Reaction condition: 1 vol% CO, 16 vol% O2 balanced with N2, total flow rate = 50 mL min-1, WHSV = 60000 mL gcat-1 h-1). (b) Apparent activation energies of various catalysts (WHSV = 300000 mL gcat-1 h-1). (c) Long-term stability test of CO oxidation at 120 °C for 70 h. (d) Light-off curves for the CO oxidation reaction under humid conditions (Reaction conditions: 5 vol% H2O, 1 vol% CO, 16 vol% O2 balanced with N2, total flow rate = 50 mL min-1, WHSV = 60000 mL gcat-1 h-1). (e) Comparison of T100 values across various catalysts under dry versus humid conditions. (f) Water tolerance assessment of MnO2-QCu during CO oxidation with periodic addition of 5 vol% H2O.

Fig. 5. (a) H2-TPR profiles of MnO2, MnO2-Qwater, and MnO2-QCu. (b) EPR spectra of superoxide O2-? species captured by DMPO as a spin-trapping agent. (c) CO-TPD profiles of MnO2, MnO2-Qwater and MnO2-QCu catalysts. (d) CO-TPSR curves showing CO2 formation over time. (e) CO-TPSR curves showing CO2 release and carbonate decomposition over temperature. In-situ time-resolved infrared spectra of CO adsorption on MnO2 (f) and MnO2-QCu (g) measured under 5 vol% CO at 5000 Pa. In-situ DRIFTS spectra collected during CO oxidation on MnO2 (h) and MnO2-QCu (i) under a flow of 1 vol% CO and 16 vol% O2 in N2 at different temperatures. (j) The proposed mechanisms for CO oxidation on the MnO2-QCu catalyst. (k) Schematic of CO oxidation over Cu-loaded MnO2 frameworks.

参考文献

[1]	S. Mitchell, R. Qin, N. Zheng, J. Pérez-Ramírez, Nat. Nanotechnol., 2021, 16, 129-139.
[2]	X. Li, S. Mitchell, Y. Fang, J. Li, J. Pérez-Ramíre, J. Lu, Nat. Rev. Chem., 2023, 7, 754-767.
[3]	T. Liu, S. Yang, J. Guan, J. Niu, Z. Zhang, F. Wang, Small Methods, 2022, 6, 2101156.
[4]	C. Ye, J. Liu, Q. Zhang, X. Jin, Y. Zhao, Z. Pan, G. Chen, Y. Qiu, D. Ye, L. Gu, G. I. N. Waterhouse, L. Guo, S. Yang, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2021, 143, 14169-14177.
[5]	S. Liu, Y. Shen, Y. Zhang, B. Cui, S. Xi, J. Zhang, L. Xu, S. Zhu, Y. Chen, Y. Deng, W. Hu, Adv. Mater., 2022, 34, 2106973.
[6]	Y. Chong, T. Chen, Y. Li, J. Lin, W.-H. Huang, C.-L. Chen, X. Jin, M. Fu, Y. Zhao, G. Chen, J. Wei, Y. Qiu, G. I. N. Waterhouse, D. Ye, Z. Lin, L. Guo, Environ. Sci. Technol., 2023, 57, 5831-5840.
[7]	Y. Chong, T. Chen, B. Zhou, Y. Li, W.-H. Huang, C.-L. Chen, J. Wei, K. Yan, Y. Qiu, G. Chen, D. Ye, ACS Catal., 2024, 14, 7201-7212.
[8]	P. Wu, T. Chen, X. Jin, S. Zhao, Y. Chong, Y. Li, J. Lin, A. Li, Y. Zhao, Y. Qiu, D. Ye, J. Hazard. Mater., 2022, 433, 128765.
[9]	C. Ye, B. Liu, Q. Li, M. Yu, Y. Liu, Z. Tai, Z. Pan, Y. Qiu, Small, 2024, 20, 2309856.
[10]	C. Ye, Z. Pan, Q. Zhang, F. Yin, Y. Wang, Y. Li, G. Chen, J. Li, Y. Qiu, G. I. N. Waterhouse, L. Gu, Z. Lin, L. Guo, Energy Environ. Sci., 2024, 17, 332-343.
[11]	A. Li, Q. Zhang, S. Zhao, Y. Chong, P. Wu, Y. Li, X. Jin, G. Chen, Y. Qiu, S. Yang, D. Ye, Nano Res., 2022, 15, 7071-7080.
[12]	T. Li, Q. Xu, M. Waqar, H. Yang, W. Gong, J. Yang, J. Zhong, Z. Liu, Energy Storage Mater., 2023, 55, 64-72.
[13]	Y. Yuan, K. He, J. Lu, Angew. Chem. Int. Ed., 2024, 63, e202316055.
[14]	S. Rong, P. Zhang, F. Liu, Y. Yang, ACS Catal., 2018, 8, 3435-3446.
[15]	Y. Yuan, K. He, B. W. Byles, C. Liu, K. Amine, J. Lu, E. Pomerantseva, R. Shahbazian-Yassar, Chem, 2019, 5, 1793-1805.
[16]	C. Lin, J.-L. Li, X. Li, S. Yang, W. Luo, Y. Zhang, S.-H. Kim, D.-H. Kim, S. S. Shinde, Y.-F. Li, Z.-P. Liu, Z. Jiang, J.-H. Lee, Nat. Catal., 2021, 4, 1012-1023.
[17]	H. Huang, H. Feng, Z. He, Y. Huang, J. Xu, C. Hu, Z. Chen, Z. Yang, W. Zhang, ACS Nano, 2024, 18, 25601-25613.
[18]	X. Ji, H. Luo, W. Dong, L. Yang, J. Guo, S. Cheng, Electrochim. Acta, 2023, 449, 142172.
[19]	L. Zeng, H. Liang, Y. Wang, X. Ying, B. Qiu, J. Pan, Y. Zhang, W. Wen, X. Wang, Q. Gu, J. Li, K. Shi, Y. Shen, Q. Liu, Z. Liu, Energy Environ. Sci., 2025, 18, 284-299.
[20]	Z. Morgan Chan, D. A. Kitchaev, J. Nelson Weker, C. Schnedermann, K. Lim, G. Ceder, W. Tumas, M. F. Toney, D. G. Nocera, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A., 2018, 115, E5261-E5268.
[21]	J.-R. Li, W.-P. Zhang, H. Xiao, M. Tian, C. He, Chin. J. Catal., 2026, 83, 388-399.
[22]	T. Gao, M. Glerup, F. Krumeich, R. Nesper, H. Fjellvåg, P. Norby, J. Phys. Chem. C, 2008, 112, 13134-13140.
[23]	S. Cheng, L. Yang, D. Chen, X. Ji, Z.-J. Jiang, D. Ding, M. Liu, Nano Energy, 2014, 9, 161-167.
[24]	L. Wu, Z. Wang, J. Liu, C. Liu, X. Li, Y. Zhang, W. Wang, J. Ma, Z. Sun, Appl. Catal. B, 2024, 343, 123526.
[25]	Y. Wei, Z. Ma, B. Liu, J. Yang, D. Wu, Y. Zhang, Y. Zhang, C. C. Xu, R. Nie, Chem. Sci., 2024, 15, 20338-20345.
[26]	C. Chen, M. Shi, Y. Zhao, C. Yang, L. Zhao, C. Yan, Chem. Eng. J., 2021, 422, 130375.
[27]	J. Mei, Y. Wu, R. Zhang, G. Xu, H. Zhou, Y. Chen, Z. Tang, Y. Li, M. Lin, D. Xia, Appl. Catal. B, 2025, 365, 124953.
[28]	S. Wang, S. Yao, F. Zhang, K. Ji, Y. Ji, J. Li, W. Fu, Y. Liu, J. Yang, R. Liu, J. Xie, Z. Yang, Y.-M. Yan, Angew. Chem. Int. Ed., 2025, 64, e202415997.
[29]	G. Ou, Y. Xu, B. Wen, R. Lin, B. Ge, Y. Tang, Y. Liang, C. Yang, K. Huang, D. Zu, R. Yu, W. Chen, J. Li, H. Wu, L.-M. Liu, Y. Li, Nat. Commun., 2018, 9, 1302.
[30]	Q. Lian, L. Hu, D. Ma, Y. Jiao, D. Xia, Y. Huang, Z. Tang, W. Qu, H. Zhao, C. He, D. D. Gang, Adv. Funct. Mater., 2022, 32, 2205054.
[31]	Y. Fang, X. Chi, L. Li, J. Yang, S. Liu, X. Lu, W. Xiao, L. Wang, Z. Luo, W. Yang, S. Hu, J. Xiong, S. Hoang, H. Deng, F. Liu, L. Zhang, P. Gao, J. Ding, Y. Guo, ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces, 2020, 12, 7091-7101.
[32]	R. Ye, L. Ma, J. Mao, X. Wang, X. Hong, A. Gallo, Y. Ma, W. Luo, B. Wang, R. Zhang, M. S. Duyar, Z. Jiang, J. Liu, Nat. Commun., 2024, 15, 2159.
[33]	L. Kang, B. Wang, A. T. Güntner, S. Xu, X. Wan, Y. Liu, S. Marlow, Y. Ren, D. Gianolio, C. C. Tang, V. Murzin, H. Asakura, Q. He, S. Guan, J. J. Velasco-Vélez, S. E. Pratsinis, Y. Guo, F. R. Wang, Angew. Chem. Int. Ed., 2021, 60, 14420-14428.
[34]	A. Chen, X. Yu, Y. Zhou, S. Miao, Y. Li, S. Kuld, J. Sehested, J. Liu, T. Aoki, S. Hong, M. F. Camellone, S. Fabris, J. Ning, C. Jin, C. Yang, A. Nefedov, C. Wöll, Y. Wang, W. Shen, Nat. Catal., 2019, 2, 334-341.
[35]	F. Liu, M. Zeng, Y. Li, Y. Yang, M. Mao, X. Zhao, Adv. Funct. Mater., 2016, 26, 4518-4526.
[36]	T. Gan, X. Chen, X. Chu, P. Jing, S. Shi, Z. Zhang, W. Zhang, J. Li, S. Zhang, M. Pavanello, D. Wang, G. Liu, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2024, 146, 16549-16557.
[37]	D. Wu, L. M. Housel, S. T. King, Z. R. Mansley, N. Sadique, Y. Zhu, L. Ma, S. N. Ehrlich, H. Zhong, E. S. Takeuchi, A. C. Marschilok, D. C. Bock, L. Wang, K. J. Takeuchi, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2022, 144, 23405-23420.
[38]	A. Zhang, R. Zhao, L. Hu, R. Yang, S. Yao, S. Wang, Z. Yang, Y.-M. Yan, Adv. Energy Mater., 2021, 11, 2101412.
[39]	J. Wang, W. Guo, M. Sun, G. Zhang, Y. Meng, Q. Zhang, Energy Environ. Sci., 2025, 18, 960-971.
[40]	Y. Fang, Q. Zhang, H. Zhang, X. Li, W. Chen, J. Xu, H. Shen, J. Yang, C. Pan, Y. Zhu, J. Wang, Z. Luo, L. Wang, X. Bai, F. Song, L. Zhang, Y. Guo, Angew. Chem. Int. Ed., 2022, 61, e202212273.
[41]	B. Feng, D. Feng, Y. Pei, B. Zong, M. Qiao, W. Li, Chin. J. Catal., 2025, 76, 96-107.
[42]	Y. Yang, G. Wu, J. Jiang, W. Zhang, S. Liu, R. Yu, F. Liu, A. Du, L. Dai, X. Mao, Q. Qin, Adv. Mater., 2024, 36, 2409697.
[43]	C.-H. Wu, C. Liu, D. Su, H. L. Xin, H.-T. Fang, B. Eren, S. Zhang, C. B. Murray, M. B. Salmeron, Nat. Catal., 2019, 2, 78-85.
[44]	Q. Fu, W.-X. Li, Y. Yao, H. Liu, H.-Y. Su, D. Ma, X.-K. Gu, L. Chen, Z. Wang, H. Zhang, B. Wang, X. Bao, Science, 2010, 328, 1141-1144.
[45]	Y. Zhao, J. Jiang, Y. Zou, P. Wang, X. Li, X. Liu, T. Zhu, Chin. J. Catal., 2025, 76, 173-184.
[46]	C. Wang, X.-K. Gu, H. Yan, Y. Lin, J. Li, D. Liu, W.-X. Li, J. Lu, ACS Catal., 2017, 7, 887-891.
[47]	R. Zhang, Q. Chen, Y.-T. Hu, L. Yang, Z. Chen, C.-W. Wang, Y.-H. Qin, ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces, 2023, 15, 58476-58486.
[48]	Y. A. May, S. Wei, W.-Z. Yu, W.-W. Wang, C.-J. Jia, Langmuir, 2020, 36, 11196-11206.
[49]	W. Song, K. He, C. Li, R. Yin, Y. Guo, A. Nie, Y. Li, K. Yang, M. Zhou, X. Lin, Z.-J. Wang, Q. Ren, S. Zhu, T. Xu, S. Liu, H. Jin, J.-J. Lv, S. Wang, Y. Yuan, Adv. Mater., 2024, 36, 2312566.
[50]	L. Liu, A. Corma, Nat. Rev. Mater., 2021, 6, 244-263.
[51]	F. He, M. Lopez-Haro, T. Chen, C. Marini, X. Dou, Q.-M. Wang, L. Liu, Nat. Synth., 2026, 5, 761-774.
[52]	Y. Li, L. Guo, M. Du, C. Tian, G. Zhao, Z. Liu, Z. Liang, K. Hou, J. Chen, X. Liu, L. Jiang, B. Nan, L. Li, Nat. Commun., 2024, 15, 5598.
[53]	B. Nan, L. Li, Y. Li, L. Guo, M. Du, Z. Liu, X. Tao, C. Tian, Z. Liang, Y. Zhang, C. Ma, L. Shen, R. Si, L. Li, Appl. Catal. B, 2023, 334, 122818.
[54]	J. Yu, Y. Yang, M. Zhang, B. Song, Y. Han, S. Wang, Z. Ren, L. Wang, P. Yin, L. Zheng, X. Zhang, M. Wei, ACS Catal., 2024, 14, 1281-1291.
[55]	H. Wang, M. S. Bootharaju, J. H. Kim, Y. Wang, K. Wang, M. Zhao, R. Zhang, J. Xu, T. Hyeon, X. Wang, S. Song, H. Zhang, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2023, 145, 2264-2270.
[56]	H. Yang, X. Wang, Q. Liu, A. Huang, X. Zhang, Y. Yu, Z. Zhuang, G. Li, Y. Li, Q. Peng, X. Chen, H. Xiao, C. Chen, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2023, 145, 6658-6670.
[57]	X. Wang, Z. Li, X. Li, C. Gao, Y. Pu, X. Zhong, J. Qian, M. Zeng, X. Chu, Z. Chen, C. Redshaw, H. Zhou, C. Sun, T. Regier, G. King, J. J. Dynes, B. Zhang, Y. Zhu, G. Li, Y. Peng, N. Wang, Y. A. Wu, Adv. Mater., 2024, 36, 2412570.
[58]	Y. Wang, M. Wang, X. Jin, A. Bohan, B. Nan, L. Li, L. Zhang, J. Shi, Appl. Catal. B, 2024, 353, 124110.

隧道限域与淬火锚定协同构筑原子级分散Cu/MnO₂催化剂用于高效催化氧化

Tunnel-confined and quenching-anchored atomic Cu in transition metal oxides for efficient catalytic oxidation

RichHTML

PDF

Supporting Information

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

扫码分享

图/表 5

参考文献

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

[1]	杜晓蕊, 黄一珂, 潘晓丽, 江训柱, 苏杨, 杨静怡, 郭亚琳, 韩冰, 文承彦, 王晨光, 乔波涛. “自上而下”构筑TiO₂与Pt纳米簇之间的活性界面I: 再分散过程和机制[J]. 催化学报, 2024, 58(3): 237-246.
[2]	杜晓蕊, 黄一珂, 潘晓丽, 江训柱, 苏杨, 杨静怡, 郭亚琳, 韩冰, 文承彦, 王晨光, 乔波涛. “自上而下”构筑TiO₂与Pt纳米簇之间的活性界面II: 催化一氧化碳氧化反应性能和机理[J]. 催化学报, 2024, 58(3): 247-254.
[3]	刘海峰, 黄祥, 陈加藏. 电子态调控促进氢气无损耗纯化中CO的光致富集和氧化[J]. 催化学报, 2023, 51(8): 49-54.
[4]	Yanan Gao, Fu-Kuo Chiang, Shaojie Li, Long Zhang, Peng Wang, Emiel J. M. Hensen. α-Fe₂O₃形貌对Au/α-Fe₂O₃催化一氧化碳氧化反应性能的影响[J]. 催化学报, 2021, 42(4): 658-665.
[5]	吴凡, 贺雷, 李文翠, 路饶, 王阳, 陆安慧. 氮化硼负载的高分散Au-CuO_x纳米颗粒用于低温CO氧化[J]. 催化学报, 2021, 42(3): 388-395.
[6]	Ya-Qiong Su, Long Zhang, Valery Muravev, Emiel J. M. Hensen. 过渡金属掺杂铈中晶格氧的活化[J]. 催化学报, 2020, 41(6): 977-984.
[7]	Valentín Briega-Martos, Enrique Herrero, Juan M. Feliu. Pt单晶电极上氧和过氧化氢还原反应研究进展[J]. 催化学报, 2020, 41(5): 732-738.
[8]	路饶, 贺雷, 王阳, 高新芊, 李文翠. 镍掺杂对氧化铝纳米片负载金催化剂在CO氧化反应中的促进作用[J]. 催化学报, 2020, 41(2): 350-356.
[9]	赵佳华, 束远, 张鹏飞. CTAB辅助的机械化学法合成介孔Fe₃O₄和Au@Fe₃O₄催化剂[J]. 催化学报, 2019, 40(7): 1078-1084.
[10]	郇伟伟, 李洁, 嵇家辉, 邢明阳. 二氧化铈促进钴氧化物表面氧化一氧化碳的原位表征研究[J]. 催化学报, 2019, 40(5): 656-663.
[11]	韩冰, 郎睿, 唐海莲, 徐嘉, 顾向奎, 乔波涛, 刘景月. 铑/氧化锌单原子催化剂的优异CO氧化反应性能[J]. 催化学报, 2019, 40(12): 1847-1853.
[12]	石文, 高彤彤, 张历云, 马彦爽, 刘忠文, 张炳森. 铁氧化物纳米棒负载金纳米颗粒催化剂载体表面结构调控对CO氧化的影响[J]. 催化学报, 2019, 40(12): 1884-1894.
[13]	王丽, 路小清, 王维, 詹望成, 郭杨龙, 郭耘. Pd-Cu-Cl_x/Al₂O₃催化剂对CO氧化的稳定性[J]. 催化学报, 2018, 39(9): 1560-1567.
[14]	谭媛, 刘华, 刘晓艳, 王爱琴, 刘昌俊, 张涛. 常压低温等离子体有效去除催化CO氧化的金原子团簇的保护剂[J]. 催化学报, 2018, 39(5): 929-936.
[15]	王凌翔, 王亮, 张建, 王海, 肖丰收. 通过CeO_x修饰提高金纳米颗粒在CO氧化反应中的催化活性和耐久性[J]. 催化学报, 2018, 39(10): 1608-1614.