TiO2晶面依赖的Ir-TiOx相互作用对Ir/TiO2催化剂巴豆醛选择性加氢性能的影响

doi:10.1016/S1872-2067(21)63810-X

催化学报 ›› 2021, Vol. 42 ›› Issue (10): 1742-1754.DOI: 10.1016/S1872-2067(21)63810-X

TiO₂晶面依赖的Ir-TiO_x相互作用对Ir/TiO₂催化剂巴豆醛选择性加氢性能的影响

贾爱平^a^,^b, 张云尚^b, 宋通洋^c, 胡一鸣^a, 郑万彬^a, 罗孟飞^a, 鲁继青^a(), 黄伟新^b^,^d()

^a浙江师范大学物理化学研究所, 教育部先进催化材料重点实验室, 浙江金华321004
^b中国科学技术大学化学物理系, 中国科学院能源转换材料重点实验室, 安徽合肥230026
^c华东师范大学化学与分子工程学院, 上海200062
^d洁净能源国家实验室(筹), 辽宁大连116023

收稿日期:2021-01-23 接受日期:2021-02-22 出版日期:2021-10-18 发布日期:2021-06-20
通讯作者: 鲁继青,黄伟新
作者简介:#(0551)63600435; 电子信箱:huangwx@ustc.edu.cn
*电话/传真: (0579)82287325; 电子信箱:jiqinglu@zjnu.cn;
基金资助:
国家自然科学基金(21773212);国家自然科学基金(21525313);国家自然科学基金(91745202);国家自然科学基金(91945301);中国科学院教育部长江学者资助项目

The effects of TiO₂ crystal-plane-dependent Ir-TiO_x interactions on the selective hydrogenation of crotonaldehyde over Ir/TiO₂ catalysts

Aiping Jia^a^,^b, Yunshang Zhang^b, Tongyang Song^c, Yiming Hu^a, Wanbin Zheng^a, Mengfei Luo^a, Jiqing Lu^a(), Weixin Huang^b^,^d()

^aKey Laboratory of the Ministry of Education for Advanced Catalysis Materials, Institute of Physical Chemistry, Zhejiang Normal University, Jinhua 321004, Zhejiang, China
^bHefei National Laboratory for Physical Sciences at the Microscale, Key Laboratory of Surface and Interface Chemistry and Energy Catalysis of Anhui Higher Education Institutes, CAS Key Laboratory of Materials for Energy Conversion, and Department of Chemical Physics, University of Science and Technology of China, Hefei 230026, Anhui, China
^cShanghai Key Laboratory of Green Chemistry and Chemical Processes, School of Chemistry and Molecular Engineering, East China Normal University, Shanghai 200062, China
^dDalian National Laboratory for Clean Energy, Dalian 116023, Liaoning, China

Received:2021-01-23 Accepted:2021-02-22 Online:2021-10-18 Published:2021-06-20
Contact: Jiqing Lu,Weixin Huang
Supported by:
National Natural Science Foundation of China(21773212);National Natural Science Foundation of China(21525313);National Natural Science Foundation of China(91745202);National Natural Science Foundation of China(91945301);Chinese Academy of Sciences, the Changjiang Scholars Program of Ministry of Education of China

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

α,β-不饱和醇是一类重要的精细化学品, 主要通过α,β-不饱和醛选择性加氢获得. 由于α,β-不饱和醛分子中含有共轭的C=C键和C=O键, 且后者键能更大, 在热力学和动力学上均不利于C=O键的选择性加氢生成α,β-不饱和醇. 因此, 提高α,β-不饱和醛中C=O的加氢选择性是催化领域中一项挑战性的课题. 巴豆醛属于典型的α,β-不饱和醛, 研究其选择性加氢生成巴豆醇具有广泛的代表意义; Ir负载在具有还原性载体(如TiO₂)上时, 表现出很好的C=O加氢选择性, 因此, 成为近年来的研究热点. 由于暴露不同晶面的TiO₂具有不同的形貌和电子结构, 因此研究Ir-TiO₂相互作用的晶面依赖性及其对巴豆醛选择性加氢反应的影响具有重要意义.
本文以分别暴露{101}、{100}和{001}晶面的锐钛矿TiO₂纳米晶为载体, 制备了负载型Ir/TiO₂催化剂, 系统研究了催化剂经过不同的预处理过程(在不同温度下H₂还原和O₂再氧化)后对巴豆醛的气相选择性加氢的性能. 利用高分辨透射电镜、原位X射线光电子能谱和原位漫反射红外光谱及氨程序升温脱附等技术研究发现, 预处理条件显著改变了Ir-TiO_x的相互作用, 包括Ir金属的几何、电子性质及催化剂表面酸性. 这种相互作用与TiO₂的暴露晶面密切相关, 从而改变了不同Ir/TiO₂催化剂上不同加氢反应行为. 研究结果表明, 经300 °C预还原的Ir/TiO₂-{101}催化剂催化性能最好, 在80 °C下初始反应速率为166.1 μmol g-Ir^‒1 s^‒1, 巴豆醇的生成转化频率为0.022 s^‒1. 与其他催化剂相比, Ir/TiO₂-{101}催化剂表面Ir⁰浓度最高, 表面酸度适中, 因此表现出最佳的催化性能. 同时Ir-TiO_x界面在反应中的协同作用, 对H₂和巴豆醛分子中C=O键的吸附和活化起到了关键作用. 然而当催化剂经过400 °C的H₂预还原后, 由于产生了强的金属-载体相互作用使得TiO_x对Ir粒子进行了包裹从而导致Ir-TiO_x界面缺失, 因而催化剂催化巴豆醛加氢性能降低. 本文为理解金属-载体相互作用对巴豆醛选择性加氢反应的影响提供了新的见解, 并为设计高性能α,β-不饱和醛选择性加氢催化剂提供了理论依据.

关键词: 加氢反应, α,β-不饱和醛, Ir/TiO₂, 金属-载体相互作用, 表面酸性

Abstract:

Three supported Ir/TiO₂ catalysts, containing anatase TiO₂ nanocrystals with predominantly exposed {101}, {100}, and {001} planes, were subjected to various pre-treatments (H₂ reduction at different temperatures and O₂ re-oxidation) and then tested in the vapor phase selective hydrogenation of crotonaldehyde. The pre-treatments significantly altered the Ir-TiO_x interactions, including the morphologies and electronic properties of the Ir species and their surface acidity. These interactions were also closely related to the crystal planes of TiO₂, which further supported the observed reaction behaviors of the various Ir/TiO₂ catalysts. The best performance was obtained using the Ir/TiO₂-{101} catalyst pre-reduced at 300 °C, owing to its higher Ir⁰ surface concentration and moderate surface acidity compared to the other catalysts. Moreover, these findings indicated the synergistic role of the Ir-TiO_x interface in the reaction, as the interfacial sites were responsible for the adsorption/activation of H₂ and the C=O bond in the crotonaldehyde molecule. However, pre-reduction at 400 °C resulted in partial encapsulation of the Ir particles by TiO_x via strong metal-support interactions, which is unfavorable for the catalytic reaction owing to the loss of Ir-TiO_x interfacial sites.

Key words: Hydrogenation, α,β-unsaturated aldehyde, Ir/TiO₂, Metal-support interactions, Surface acidity

贾爱平, 张云尚, 宋通洋, 胡一鸣, 郑万彬, 罗孟飞, 鲁继青, 黄伟新. TiO₂晶面依赖的Ir-TiO_x相互作用对Ir/TiO₂催化剂巴豆醛选择性加氢性能的影响[J]. 催化学报, 2021, 42(10): 1742-1754.

Aiping Jia, Yunshang Zhang, Tongyang Song, Yiming Hu, Wanbin Zheng, Mengfei Luo, Jiqing Lu, Weixin Huang. The effects of TiO₂ crystal-plane-dependent Ir-TiO_x interactions on the selective hydrogenation of crotonaldehyde over Ir/TiO₂ catalysts[J]. Chinese Journal of Catalysis, 2021, 42(10): 1742-1754.

×
扫码分享

导出引用管理器 EndNote|Ris|BibTeX

链接本文: https://www.cjcatal.com/CN/10.1016/S1872-2067(21)63810-X

https://www.cjcatal.com/CN/Y2021/V42/I10/1742

图/表 12

Scheme 1. CRAL hydrogenation reaction pathways.

Fig. 1. HRTEM images and Ir particle size distributions for the Ir/TiO2-{101}, Ir/TiO2-{100}, and Ir/TiO2-{001} catalysts after the reduction pre-treatment at 200 °C (a1-a3), 300 °C (b1-b3), 400 °C (c1-c3), and reduction at 400 °C followed by re-oxidation at 300 °C (d1-d3).

Table 1 Physical properties of the various Ir-based catalysts.

Catalysts	d_VA^a /nm	Ir⁰/Ir^δ⁺ molar ratio ^b	Ir/Ti molar ratio		Surface Cl/Ti molar ratio ^e
Catalysts	d_VA^a /nm	Ir⁰/Ir^δ⁺ molar ratio ^b	Bulk ^c	Surface ^d	Calcined	Pre-treated
Ir/TiO₂-{101}-H200	1.0	1.5	0.012	0.038	0.037	0.012
Ir/TiO₂-{101}-H300	1.3	5.9	0.012	0.042	0.037	0.008
Ir/TiO₂-{101}-H400	1.4	3.0	0.012	0.036	0.037	0.002
Ir/TiO₂-{101}-H400+O300	1.5	0.4	0.012	0.039	0.037	0.001
Ir/TiO₂-{100}-H200	0.9	0.5	0.013	0.048	0.042	0.015
Ir/TiO₂-{100}-H300	1.3	2.5	0.013	0.055	0.042	0.007
Ir/TiO₂-{100}-H400	1.6	2.0	0.013	0.051	0.042	0.003
Ir/TiO₂-{100}-H400+O300	2.3	0.4	0.013	0.038	0.042	0.002
Ir/TiO₂-{001}-H200	1.3	0.7	0.012	0.044	0.042	0.016
Ir/TiO₂-{001}-H300	1.4	2.9	0.012	0.056	0.038	0.008
Ir/TiO₂-{001}-H400	1.5	2.3	0.012	0.050	0.038	0.003
Ir/TiO₂-{001}- H400+O300	2.0	0.7	0.012	0.037	0.038	0.002

Fig. 2. XPS spectra of the Ir 4f core level of the pre-treated Ir/TiO2-{101} (a), Ir/TiO2-{100} (b), and Ir/TiO2-{001} (c) catalysts.

Fig. 3. In situ DRIFTS of CO adsorption on the pre-treated Ir/TiO2-{101} (a), Ir/TiO2-{100} (b), and Ir/TiO2-{001} (c) catalysts at 30 °C.

Fig. 4. EPR spectra of Ir/TiO2-{101} (a), Ir/TiO2-{100} (b), and Ir/TiO2-{001} (c) catalysts after conducting the various pre-treatments at 130 K. (Note: similar sample weights (~30 ± 1 mg) were used).

Fig. 5. NH3-TPD profiles of the pre-treated Ir/TiO2-{101} (a), Ir/TiO2-{100} (b), and Ir/TiO2-{001} (c) catalysts.

Fig. 6. A comparison between the CRAL conversion, selectivity to CROL, CRAL reaction rates, and TOFs (turnover frequencies for CROL formation based on Ir dispersion) over the pre-treated Ir/TiO2-{101} (a,d), Ir/TiO2-{100} (b,f), and Ir/TiO2-{001} (c,e) catalysts after 30 min on stream. Reaction conditions: catalyst weight = 4.0 ± 0.1 mg; T = 80 °C; total flow rate = 26 mL min-1; CRAL concentration = 1 mol%.

Fig. 7. FTIR spectra of CRAL desorption at elevated temperatures from the pre-treated Ir/TiO2-{101} (a), Ir/TiO2-{100} (b), and Ir/TiO2-{001} (c) catalysts between 1200 and 1800 cm-1.

Fig. 8. CRAL hydrogenation over the various pre-reduced Ir/TiO2-{101} (a), Ir/TiO2-{100} (b), and Ir/TiO2-{001} (c) catalysts at 30 °C between 1200 and 1800 cm-1.

Fig. 9. Evolution of the Ir particle size (a), Ir0/Irδ+ molar ratio (b), surface acidity (c), CRAL reaction rate (d), and TOF (e) of CROL formation for Ir/TiO2; (f) Selectivity to CROL over the pre-treated Ir/TiO2 catalysts.

Scheme 2. Proposed reaction mechanism for crotonaldehyde hydrogenation over the Ir/TiO2 catalysts.

参考文献

[1]	X. Lan, T. Wang, ACS Catal., 2020,10, 2764-2790.
[2]	P. Gallezot, D. Richard, Catal. Rev. Sci. Eng., 1998,40, 81-126.
[3]	P. Mäki-Arvela, J. Hájek, T. Salmi, D. Y. Murzin, Appl. Catal. A, 2005,292, 1-49.
[4]	C. Mohr, H. Hofmeister, J. Radnik, P. Claus, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2003,125, 1905-1911.
[5]	Y. Tan, X. Liu, L. Zhang, F. Liu, A. Wang, T. Zhang, Chin. J. Catal., 2021, 470-481.
[6]	A. Dandekar, M. A. Vannice, J. Catal., 1999,183, 344-354.
[7]	P. Reyes, M. C. Aguirre, I. Melián-Cabrera, M. L. Granados, J. L. G. Fierro, J. Catal., 2002,208, 229-237.
[8]	Y. Mueanngern, Y. Baker, A. Quinn, L R. Baker, Catal. Sci. Technol., 2016,6, 6824-6835.
[9]	B. Campo, C. Petit, M. A. Volpe, J. Catal., 2008,254, 71-78.
[10]	F. Delbecq, Y. Li, D. Loffreda, J. Catal., 2016,334, 68-78.
[11]	Y. Mueanngern, X. Yang, Y. Tang, F. Tao, L. R. Baker, J. Phys. Chem. C, 2017,121, 13765-13776.
[12]	H. Y. Zheng, G. Q. Xie, X. X. Wang, L. Y. Jin, M. F. Luo, Acta. Phys. Chim. Sin., 2010,26, 3273-3277.
[13]	G. Kennedy, G. Melaet, H. L. Han, W. T. Ralston, G. A. Somorjai, ACS Catal., 2016,6, 7140-7147.
[14]	M. Aoun, A. Benamar, M. Chater. Chin. J. Catal., 2011,32, 1185-1190.
[15]	M. Dhanagopal, D. Divakar, R. A. Valentine, M. R. Viswanathan, S. Thiripuranthagan, Chin. J. Catal., 2010,31, 1200-1208.
[16]	C. J. Stephenson, C. L. Whitford, P. C.Stair, O. K. Farha, J. T. Hupp, ChemCatChem, 2016,8, 855-860.
[17]	M. Tamura, K. Tokonami, Y. Nakagawa, K. Tomishige, ACS Catal., 2016,6, 3600-3609.
[18]	J. F. Yuan, C. Q. Luo, Q. Yu, A. P. Jia, G. S. Hu, J. Q. Lu, M. F. Luo. Catal. Sci. Technol., 2016,6, 4294-4305.
[19]	Y. M. Xu, W. B. Zheng, Y. M. Hu, C. Tang, A. P. Jia, J. Q. Lu, J. Catal., 2020,381, 222-233.
[20]	S. Tian, W. Gong, W. Chen, N. Lin, Y. I. Zhu, Q. Feng, Q. Xu, Q. Fu, C. Chen, J. Luo, W. Yan, H. Zhao, D. Wang, Y. Li. ACS Catal., 2019,9, 5223-5230.
[21]	W. Lin, H. Cheng, X. Li, C. Zhang, F. Zhao, M. Arai, Chin. J. Catal., 2018,39, 988-996.
[22]	J. J. Martinez, H. Rojas, G. Borda, P. Reyes, Chemical Industries, Boca Raton, FL,United States, 2009,123, 117-125.
[23]	P. Reyes, H. Rojas, J. L. G. Fierro, J. Mol. Catal. A, 2003,203, 203-211.
[24]	P. Chen, J. Lu, G. Xie, G. Hu, L. Zhu, L. Luo, W. Huang, M. Luo, Appl. Catal. A, 2012, 236-242.
[25]	H. A. Rojas, J. J. Martínez, G. Díaz, A. Gómez-Cortés, Appl. Catal. A, 2015,503, 196-202.
[26]	M. Albert Vannice, B. SEN, J. Catal., 1989,115, 65-78.
[27]	T. W. van Deelen, C. H. Mejía, K. P. de Jong, Nat. Catal., 2019,2, 955-970.
[28]	L. C. Liu, C. Y. Ge, W. X. Zou, X. R. Gu, F. Gao, L. Dong, Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys., 2015,17, 5133-5140.
[29]	M. H. Cao, Z. Y. Tang, Q. P. Liu, Y. Xu, M. Chen, H.P. Lin, Y. Y. Li, E. Gross, Q. Zhang, Nano Lett., 2016,16, 5298-5302.
[30]	F. Ammari, J. Lamotte, R. Touroude, J. Catal., 2004,221, 32-42.
[31]	M. Englisch, A. Jentys, J. A. Lercher, J. Catal., 1997,166, 25-35.
[32]	A. P. Jia, Y. S. Zhang, T. Y. Song, Z. H. Zhang, C. Tang, Y. M. Hu, W. B. Zheng, M. F. Luo, J. Q. Lu, W. X. Huang, J. Catal., 2021,395, 10-22.
[33]	S. Chen, A. M. Abdel-Mageed, D. Li, J. Bansmann, S. Cisneros, J. Biskupek, W. Huang, R. J. Behm, Angew. Chem. Int. Ed., 2019,58, 10732-10736.
[34]	L. Liu, X. Gu, Y. Cao, X. Yao, L. Zhang, C. Tang, F. Gao, L. Dong, ACS Catal., 2013,3, 2768-2775.
[35]	X. Han, Q. Kuang, M. Jin, Z. Xie, L. Zheng, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2009,131, 3152-3153.
[36]	Y. Liu, Z. Wang, W. Wang, W. Huang, J. Catal., 2014,310, 16-23.
[37]	S. J. Tauster, S. C. Fung, R. L. Garten, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 1978,100, 170-175.
[38]	M. Lazzeri, A. Vittadini, A. Sellon, Phys. Rev. B, 2001,63, 155409.
[39]	Y. M. López-De Jesús, A. Vicente, G. Lafaye, P. Marécot, C. T. Williams, J. Phys. Chem. C, 2008,112, 13837-13845.
[40]	F. J. C. M. Toolenar, A. G. T. M. Bastein, V. Ponec, J. Catal., 1983,82, 35-44.
[41]	C. R. Guerra, J. H. Schulman, Surf. Sci., 1967,7, 229-249.
[42]	D. Li, S. Chen, R. You, Y. Liu, M. Yang, T. Cao, K. Qian, Z. Zhang, J. Tian, W. Huang, J. Catal., 2018,368, 163-171.
[43]	M. Okumura, J. M. Coronado, J. Soria, M. Haruta, J. C. Conesa, J. Catal., 2001,203, 168-174.
[44]	D. Li, R. You, M. Yang, Y. Liu, K. Qian, S. Chen, T. Cao, Z. Zhang, J. Tian, W. Huang, J. Phys. Chem. C, 2019,123, 10367-10376.
[45]	L. Zhu, G. S. Hu, J. Q. Lu, G. Q. Xie, P. Chen, M. F. Luo, Catal. Commun., 2012,21, 5-8.
[46]	X. Hong, B. Li, Y. Wang, J. Lu, G. Hu, M. Luo, Appl. Surf. Sci., 2013,270, 388-394.
[47]	A. Sepúlveda-Escribano, F. Coloma, F. Rodríguez-Reinoso, J. Catal., 1998,178, 649-657.
[48]	B. A. Riguetto, C. E. C. Rodrigues, M. A. Morales, E. Baggio-Saitovitch, L. Gengembre, E. Payen, C. M. P. Marques, J. M. C. Bueno, Appl. Catal. A, 2007,318, 70-78.
[49]	F. Ammari, J. Lamotte, R. Touroude, J. Catal., 2004,221, 32-42.
[50]	T. Kim, J. Kim, H. C. Song, D. Kim, B. Jeong, J. Lee, J. W. Shin, R. Ryoo, J. Y. Park, ACS Catal., 2020,10, 10459-10467.
[51]	C. H. Wu, C. Liu, D. Su, H. L. Xin, H. T. Fang, B. E. S. Zhang, C. B. Murray, M. B. Salmeron, Nat. Catal., 2019,2, 78-85.
[52]	J. Kim, W. H. Park, W. H. Doh, S.W. Lee, M. C. Noh, J.-J. Gallet, F. Bournel, H. Kondoh, K. Mase, Y. Jung, B. S. Mun, J. Y. Park, Sci. Adv., 2018, 4, eaat3151.

TiO₂晶面依赖的Ir-TiO_x相互作用对Ir/TiO₂催化剂巴豆醛选择性加氢性能的影响

The effects of TiO₂ crystal-plane-dependent Ir-TiO_x interactions on the selective hydrogenation of crotonaldehyde over Ir/TiO₂ catalysts

RichHTML

PDF

Supporting Information

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

扫码分享

图/表 12

参考文献

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

[1]	张华阳, 田文婕, 段晓光, 孙红旗, 黄应平, 方艳芬, 王少彬. 金属基载体支撑的单原子催化剂用于光催化还原反应[J]. 催化学报, 2022, 43(9): 2301-2315.
[2]	李鹏, 赵国强, 程宁燕, 夏力学, 李晓宁, 陈亚平, 劳梦梦, 程振祥, 赵焱, 徐迅, 姜银珠, 潘洪革, 窦士学, 孙文平. 过渡金属单原子功能化碳载体促进碱性氢电催化反应动力学[J]. 催化学报, 2022, 43(5): 1351-1359.
[3]	王可, 何仕辉, 林云志, 陈旬, 戴文新, 付贤智. 氧空位修饰的暴露TiO₂{001}的Ru/TiO₂增强光热协同CO₂甲烷化活性和稳定性[J]. 催化学报, 2022, 43(2): 391-402.
[4]	赵东越, 杨岳溪, 高中楠, 尹萌欣, 田野, 张静, 姜政, 于晓波, 李新刚. 贫燃/富燃循环气氛下原位活化Pd负载钙钛矿催化剂促进NO_x还原消除[J]. 催化学报, 2021, 42(5): 795-807.
[5]	王伟银, 林露, 齐海峰, 曹文秀, 李志, 陈少华, 邹晓轩, 陈铁红, 唐南方, 宋卫余, 王爱琴, 罗文豪. MIL-53 (Al)衍生的Rh单原子催化剂在间氯硝基苯选择性加氢制间氯苯胺反应中的应用[J]. 催化学报, 2021, 42(5): 824-834.
[6]	高玉仙, 张振华, 李兆瑞, 黄伟新. 从头开始理解形貌依赖的CuO_x-CeO₂相互作用[J]. 催化学报, 2020, 41(6): 1006-1016.
[7]	廖文敏, 赵培培, 岑丙横, 贾爱平, 鲁继青, 罗孟飞. Co-Cr-O复合氧化物上丙烷低温完全氧化:结构效应、反应动力学和原位光谱研究[J]. 催化学报, 2020, 41(3): 442-453.
[8]	杨慧敏, 陈耀, 覃勇. 原子层沉积方法在设计制备高效电催化剂中的应用[J]. 催化学报, 2020, 41(2): 227-241.
[9]	李露露, 李佩晓, 谭伟, 马凯莉, 邹伟欣, 汤常金, 董林. 表面Mo修饰提高CeTiO_x催化剂低温脱硝性能[J]. 催化学报, 2020, 41(2): 364-373.
[10]	孙晓颖, 刘美君, 黄瑶瑶, 李波, 赵震. 单原子铂和氮化硼载体之间电子作用及其对丙烷脱氢反应催化性能的影响[J]. 催化学报, 2019, 40(6): 819-825.
[11]	姚小江, 曹俊, 陈丽, 亢科科, 陈阳, 田密, 杨复沫. MnO_x/CeO₂纳米棒催化剂在低温NH₃-SCR反应中的阳离子(Zr⁴⁺,Al³⁺,Si⁴⁺)掺杂效应[J]. 催化学报, 2019, 40(5): 733-743.
[12]	常化振, 史传宁, 李明冠, 张涛, 王驰中, 江莉龙, 王秀云. 不同阳离子(NH₄⁺,Na⁺,K⁺,Ca²⁺)溴化物对商用SCR催化剂化学中毒影响机制研究[J]. 催化学报, 2018, 39(4): 710-717.
[13]	陈磊, 翁鼎, 汪家道, 翁端, 曹丽. WO₃改性CeO₂-TiO₂催化剂的低温NH₃-NO/NO₂ SCR活性和机理研究[J]. 催化学报, 2018, 39(11): 1804-1813.
[14]	张豫, 叶陈良, 郭翠梨, 甘长娜, 佟昕檬. In-Cu/SiO₂催化剂用于醋酸甲酯加氢反应制乙醇[J]. 催化学报, 2018, 39(1): 99-108.
[15]	韩冰, 郎睿, 乔波涛, 王爱琴, 张涛. 单原子催化的最新进展[J]. 催化学报, 2017, 38(9): 1498-1507.