催化学报 ›› 2025, Vol. 77: 123-143.DOI: 10.1016/S1872-2067(25)64760-7
Tristan James Sima,1, Yun Ha Songa,1, Jaehee Shima, Gihoon Leea, 李良清b,c, Young Soo Kod, Jungkyu Choia,*()
收稿日期:
2025-04-30
接受日期:
2025-06-18
出版日期:
2025-10-18
发布日期:
2025-10-05
通讯作者:
*电子信箱: jungkyu_choi@korea.ac.kr (J. Choi).
作者简介:
1共同第一作者.
Tristan James Sima,1, Yun Ha Songa,1, Jaehee Shima, Gihoon Leea, Liangqing Lib,c, Young Soo Kod, Jungkyu Choia,*()
Received:
2025-04-30
Accepted:
2025-06-18
Online:
2025-10-18
Published:
2025-10-05
Contact:
*E-mail: jungkyu_choi@korea.ac.kr (J. Choi).
About author:
1Contributed equally to this work.
摘要:
本文研究了浸渍钼的H-MCM-22催化剂在甲烷脱氢芳构化(MDA)反应中制备苯和甲苯等芳烃的性能. 采用水热脱铝减少载体H-MCM-22的Brönsted酸位点数量以提升催化剂的性能, 发现400 oC为最优水热处理温度. 在此条件下制备的Mo/M_400催化剂中, Brönsted酸位点数量减少至适宜水平, 且钼的分布状态与Mo/M相当. 系统考察表明, 适度脱铝显著降低了强Brönsted酸位点含量, 改善了Mo物种的空间分布, 使苯和甲苯生成速率达5.23 mmol·g‒¹·h‒¹, 较原始催化剂(4.73 mmol·g‒¹·h‒¹)提升显著. 积碳分析结果表明, 十元环孔道中积碳沉积减少, 而十二元环超笼可容纳积碳至反应后期, 从而延长了催化寿命. 机理研究表明, Brönsted酸位点与Mo物种的相互作用减弱促进了中间产物C2 (乙烷/乙烯)的稳定转化, 同时抑制了多环芳烃的生成. 与现有文献相比, Mo/M_400的综合性能优于多数报道的Mo基催化剂, 为天然气高效转化提供了新思路.
Tristan James Sim, Yun Ha Song, Jaehee Shim, Gihoon Lee, 李良清, Young Soo Ko, Jungkyu Choi. 脱除MWW沸石骨架铝实现钼浸渍催化剂性能突破:积炭成因及其对甲烷脱氢芳构化影响的系统阐释[J]. 催化学报, 2025, 77: 123-143.
Tristan James Sim, Yun Ha Song, Jaehee Shim, Gihoon Lee, Liangqing Li, Young Soo Ko, Jungkyu Choi. Simple removal of framework aluminum from MWW type zeolites for unprecedented optimal Mo-impregnated catalysts: Systematic elucidation of coke deposition and its impact on methane dehydroaromatization[J]. Chinese Journal of Catalysis, 2025, 77: 123-143.
Fig. 1. BT formation rates of Mo/M and Mo/M_x (x = 200, 250, 300, 350, 400, 450, 500, 600, and 700) as a function of TOS. Solid black squares corresponding to Mo/M are enlarged for visibility. Gray arrows, which denote the changes in performance compared to Mo/M, are added for eye-guidance. All MDA reactions were conducted at 700 °C and atmospheric pressure.
Fig. 2. Characterization of Mo/M and Mo/M_x (x = 400, 500, and 600). (a) XRD patterns. (b) Ar adsorption-desorption isotherms at 87 K (adsorption: solid and desorption: open). (c) H-K pore size distributions from 0.4 to 0.8 nm. (d) BJH pore size distributions from 2 to 10 nm. In (a), for a fair comparison, the simulated XRD patterns of MoO3 and all-silica MWW type zeolite are included at top and bottom, respectively, and inverted red triangles indicate the peaks arising from ɑ-alumina, which was used as an internal standard. MoO3 was obtained by calcining the Mo precursor (ammonium heptamolybdate tetrahydrate) under the same conditions used for the four Mo-impregnated catalysts. In (b) and (c), the solid or open black squares corresponding to Mo/M are enlarged for visibility. In (b), the inset shows a narrower axis for the adsorbed amount. In (c), for clarity, schematics of MCM-22 and its pore network system are provided. The pore size distributions in (c) and (d) were calculated from Ar adsorption branches.
Fig. 3. Acid characterization of the H-MCM-22 support series (M and M_x; x = 400, 500, and 600) and their Mo-impregnated catalysts (Mo/M and Mo/M_x; x = 400, 500, and 600). NH3-TPD profiles (a,b) and Py-adsorption FT-IR spectra (c,d). In (a), the dashed line emphasizes the decrease in acid strength. In (c) and (d), BAS and LAS stand for the Br?nsted acid sites and Lewis acid sites, respectively. Additionally, offset values for absorbance are indicated.
Sample | Based on NH3-TPD analysis | Based on Py-adsorption FT-IR analysis | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Brönsted acid sites a (µmol·g−1) | Lewis acid sites b (µmol·g−1) | Brönsted acid sites c (µmol·g−1) | Lewis acid sites d (µmol·g−1) | ||
M | 636.9 | 59.5 | 519.1 | 97.0 | |
Mo/M | 530.2 | 45.1 | 412.9 | 92.3 | |
M_400 | 536.4 | 46.9 | 452.8 | 122.1 | |
Mo/M_400 | 501.3 | 41.2 | 436.5 | 118.9 | |
M_500 | 405.9 | 45.8 | 308.6 | 116.4 | |
Mo/M_500 | 413.2 | 26.7 | 347.4 | 84.9 | |
M_600 | 311.2 | 20.2 | 224.0 | 108.5 | |
Mo/M_600 | 334.2 | 19.4 | 250.8 | 69.7 |
Table 1 Acid quantifications of Mo/M and Mo/M_x (x = 400, 500, and 600) based on NH3-TPD and Py-adsorption FT-IR analyses.
Sample | Based on NH3-TPD analysis | Based on Py-adsorption FT-IR analysis | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Brönsted acid sites a (µmol·g−1) | Lewis acid sites b (µmol·g−1) | Brönsted acid sites c (µmol·g−1) | Lewis acid sites d (µmol·g−1) | ||
M | 636.9 | 59.5 | 519.1 | 97.0 | |
Mo/M | 530.2 | 45.1 | 412.9 | 92.3 | |
M_400 | 536.4 | 46.9 | 452.8 | 122.1 | |
Mo/M_400 | 501.3 | 41.2 | 436.5 | 118.9 | |
M_500 | 405.9 | 45.8 | 308.6 | 116.4 | |
Mo/M_500 | 413.2 | 26.7 | 347.4 | 84.9 | |
M_600 | 311.2 | 20.2 | 224.0 | 108.5 | |
Mo/M_600 | 334.2 | 19.4 | 250.8 | 69.7 |
Fig. 4. 27Al MAS NMR spectra of the H-MCM-22 support series (M and M_x; x = 400, 500, and 600) (a) and their Mo-impregnated catalysts (Mo/M and Mo/M_x; x = 400, 500, and 600) (b).
Fig. 5. BT formation rates (as in Fig. 1) (a) and CH4 conversions (b) of Mo/M and Mo/M_x (x = 400, 500, and 600). In (a), the naphthalene (naph) formation rates for the corresponding catalysts are shown in the inset. In (b), the inset shows a narrower axis for CH4 conversion. All MDA reactions were conducted at 700 °C and atmospheric pressure for ca. 32 h.
Fig. 6. BT (same as Fig. 5(a) with the initial TOS omitted) and C2 formation rates of Mo/M (a), Mo/M_400 (b), Mo/M_500 (c), and Mo/M_600 (d) as a function of TOS. Shaded orange regions indicate the specific TOS wherein the C2 formation rate decreased. Linear fitting equations of C2 formation rates before the point of decline were calculated for quantitative comparison.
Fig. 7. Mo 3d XPS spectra (a) and H2-TPR profiles (b) of Mo/M and Mo/M_x (x = 400, 500, and 600). In (a), the deconvoluted spectra show typical peaks of the Mo6+ species in the calcined catalysts. Additionally, offset values for intensity are indicated. In (b), the H2-TPR profile of Mo/ITQ-1(C) is also included for comparison.
Fig. 8. Coke and deactivation analyses of spent Mo/M and Mo/M_x (x = 400, 500, and 600). Accumulated amounts of coke determined from TGA (a) and combined TG and Ar physisorption analyses (b) as a function of reaction time. The amounts of soft and hard coke in (a) were obtained by decoupling the two representative peaks at the low and high temperatures in the TGA profiles shown in Fig. S13. In (a), numerical values (i.e., slopes from linear fittings) are included to signify the estimated accumulation rates (mgcoke·g?1·h?1) of soft coke. (c) Ratios of accumulated amounts of coke in 12-MR pores to that in 10-MR pores as a function of reaction time. Accumulated amounts of coke in the 10-MR or 12-MR pores as a function of reaction time (d1) along with BT and C2 formation rates as shown in Fig. 6 (d2). The accumulated amounts of coke in each pore were determined by multiplying the difference between the fresh and spent catalyst pore volumes to an assumed coke density (i.e., (V10-MR/12-MR,fresh - V10-MR/12-MR,spent) × d1 or 2). Shaded gray regions in (b), (c), and (d1) indicate reaction times during which a change in coke density was assumed to occur. Dashed lines in (d1)-(d2) are included for eye-guidance in which a change in color denotes possible trend changes (orange-to-red and gray-to-black).
Fig. 9. (a) BT yields of Mo/M and Mo/M_x (x = 400, 500, and 600) as a function of TOS fitted by Eq. (1). (b) Deactivation coefficients of Mo/M and Mo/M_x (x = 400, 500, and 600) plotted against the corresponding total amounts of BT produced during the 32-h reaction. The dashed curve is added for eye-guidance.
Sample | ka × 103 ( | ab ( | R2 |
---|---|---|---|
Mo/M | 6.1 ± 0.4 | 12.0 ± 0.8 | 0.98 |
Mo/M_400 | 5.9 ± 0.3 | 7.5 ± 0.4 | 0.97 |
Mo/M_500 | 6.6 ± 0.5 | 14.3 ± 1.1 | 0.98 |
Mo/M_600 | 8.1 ± 1.1 | 21.9 ± 3.0 | 0.98 |
Table 2 Rate constants (k) and deactivation coefficients (a), along with the 95% confidence intervals, extracted by fitting the curves to the BT yields as a function of TOS (Fig. 9(a)) using Eq. (1) [156].
Sample | ka × 103 ( | ab ( | R2 |
---|---|---|---|
Mo/M | 6.1 ± 0.4 | 12.0 ± 0.8 | 0.98 |
Mo/M_400 | 5.9 ± 0.3 | 7.5 ± 0.4 | 0.97 |
Mo/M_500 | 6.6 ± 0.5 | 14.3 ± 1.1 | 0.98 |
Mo/M_600 | 8.1 ± 1.1 | 21.9 ± 3.0 | 0.98 |
Scheme 2. Generalized scheme for the four representative Mo-impregnated catalysts (Mo/M and Mo/M_x; x = 400, 500, and 600). Starting with either pristine or hydrothermally treated H-MCM-22 supports, various effects on the C2 (before decrease) and aromatic (BT and naphthalene) yields and coke formation behaviors (especially in relation to the pore systems, as in Fig. 8(c)) depended on the amount of BAS in each H-MCM-22 support and, simultaneously, the distribution of Mo in the resulting Mo-impregnated catalyst.
Fig. 10. MDA performance of Mo/M and Mo/M_400 (red dashed ellipse) along with those of Mo-impregnated MCM-22 (solid black squares) catalysts prepared in this study and Mo-impregnated MCM-22 (open squares) and ZSM-5 (open circles) catalysts reported in the literature [51,74,76,77,85,107,118,122,128,160-170]. Detailed information about the catalysts and their MDA performance is given in Table S3. For fair comparison, we considered the results obtained after a TOS of ca. 6-7 h. The x- and y-axes correspond to CH4 conversion and BT/benzene selectivity, respectively, and the curves indicate the contour of the BT or benzene yield. Depending on the availability of data, the selectivities can either refer to BT selectivities or benzene selectivity alone. Unless otherwise indicated, data were gathered from MDA reactions having similar conditions employed in this study (ca. 700 °C, 1 atm, and 1500-1800 mL·g?1·h?1). Numbers in parentheses (i.e., (n1, n2)) denote the nominal weight percent loading of Mo (n1) and the Si/Al ratio (n2) of the support. Gray arrows are added to point the change from pristine catalysts to treated ones. Error bars for Mo/M and Mo/M_400 correspond to standard deviations calculated from five runs of MDA.
|
[1] | 庹杰, 盛振腾, 龚贤晨, 杨琪, 吴鹏, 徐浩. ZnCeZrOx/MCM-22择形催化二氧化碳加氢耦合甲苯甲基化反应[J]. 催化学报, 2025, 73(6): 174-185. |
[2] | Jangeon Roh, Kihun Nam, Yong Hyun Lim, Yeseul Hwang, Hae Won Ryu, Kyoungmin Kim, Gyeongmin Seok, Yangho Jeong, Jong Hun Kang, Jungyeop Lee, Jong-Ki Jeon, Do Heui Kim. 二氧化硅壳层包覆NiO与Mo/HZSM-5物理混合对甲烷脱氢芳构化的促进作用[J]. 催化学报, 2025, 71(4): 220-233. |
[3] | 王畅, 颜婷婷, 戴卫理. Y/Beta催化剂上丙酮制异丁烯反应的失活机理[J]. 催化学报, 2024, 64(9): 133-142. |
[4] | 苟王燕, 王译晨, 张铭凯, 谈晓荷, 马媛媛, 瞿永泉. 设计稳定的钌基析氢和析氧反应催化剂的基本原理[J]. 催化学报, 2024, 60(5): 68-106. |
[5] | Enara Fernandez, Laura Santamaria, Irati García, Maider Amutio, Maite Artetxe, Gartzen Lopez, Javier Bilbao, Martin Olazar. 不同固定床位置生物质热解挥发物蒸汽催化重整反应中焦炭的形成和演化[J]. 催化学报, 2023, 48(5): 101-116. |
[6] | 林杉帆, 郅玉春, 张文娜, 袁小帅, 张成伟, 叶茂, 徐舒涛, 魏迎旭, 刘中民. 氢转移反应对分子筛催化甲醇和二甲醚动态自催化反应历程的贡献: 深入理解甲醛的生成机理和作用机制[J]. 催化学报, 2023, 46(3): 11-27. |
[7] | 王冶, 韩晶峰, 王男, 李冰, 杨淼, 吴一墨, 江子潇, 魏迎旭, 田鹏, 刘中民. SAPO-14催化的甲醇制丙烯反应: 反应机理与失活[J]. 催化学报, 2022, 43(8): 2259-2269. |
[8] | 王梦茹, 王奕, 牟效玲, 林荣和, 丁云杰. 1,3-丁二烯选择性加氢催化剂的设计策略以及构效关系[J]. 催化学报, 2022, 43(4): 1017-1041. |
[9] | 吕宏伟, 国文馨, 陈敏, 周煌, 吴宇恩. 热稳定单原子催化剂的理性构筑: 从原子级结构到实际应用[J]. 催化学报, 2022, 43(1): 71-91. |
[10] | 任栎, 王博文, 陆琨, 彭如斯, 关业军, 蒋金刚, 徐浩, 吴鹏. 脱铝丝光分子筛应用于MTP反应: Al的落位和晶体形貌的影响[J]. 催化学报, 2021, 42(7): 1147-1159. |
[11] | 雷念, 苗治理, 刘菲, 王华, 潘晓丽, 王爱琴, 张涛. 甘油氢解反应中Pt/WO3/Al2O3催化剂的失活行为[J]. 催化学报, 2020, 41(8): 1261-1267. |
[12] | 周吉彬, 赵建平, 张今令, 张涛, 叶茂, 刘中民. 积碳失活催化剂的再生[J]. 催化学报, 2020, 41(7): 1048-1061. |
[13] | 于东霓, 戴卫理, 武光军, 关乃佳, 李兰冬. 分子筛稳定的Cu物种催化乙醇脱氢制乙醛[J]. 催化学报, 2019, 40(9): 1375-1384. |
[14] | 常化振, 史传宁, 李明冠, 张涛, 王驰中, 江莉龙, 王秀云. 不同阳离子(NH4+,Na+,K+,Ca2+)溴化物对商用SCR催化剂化学中毒影响机制研究[J]. 催化学报, 2018, 39(4): 710-717. |
[15] | Leyla Vafi, Ramin Karimzadeh. 增强LPG催化裂化催化剂ZSM-5稳定性的新方法:脱铝和负载硅[J]. 催化学报, 2016, 37(4): 628-635. |
阅读次数 | ||||||
全文 |
|
|||||
摘要 |
|
|||||