Chinese Journal of Catalysis ›› 2024, Vol. 66: 110-138.DOI: 10.1016/S1872-2067(24)60157-9
• Reviews • Previous Articles Next Articles
Ya’nan Xiaa, Jingqi Chia,*(), Junheng Tanga, Xiaobin Liua,c, Zhenyu Xiaoa,b, Jianping Laia,b, Lei Wanga,b,*(
)
Received:
2024-07-15
Accepted:
2024-09-09
Online:
2024-11-18
Published:
2024-11-10
Contact:
*E-mail: About author:
Jingqi Chi received her B. S. degree and Ph.D. degree from the State Key Laboratory of Heavy Oil Processing, China University of Petroleum (East China). She is currently an associate professor at Qing dao University of Science and Technology. Her research interests focus on the design and synthesis of transition metal-based nanostructures and porous MOFs materials for electrochemical applications.Supported by:
Ya’nan Xia, Jingqi Chi, Junheng Tang, Xiaobin Liu, Zhenyu Xiao, Jianping Lai, Lei Wang. Research progress of anionic vacancies in electrocatalysts for oxygen evolution reaction[J]. Chinese Journal of Catalysis, 2024, 66: 110-138.
Add to citation manager EndNote|Ris|BibTeX
URL: https://www.cjcatal.com/EN/10.1016/S1872-2067(24)60157-9
Fig. 2. Summary of methods for introducing anionic vacancies using different strategies [41??-44]. Reprinted with permission from Ref. [41]. Copyright 2023, Elsevier; Reprinted with permission from Ref. [43]. Copyright 2022, Elsevier; Reprinted with permission from Ref. [44]. Copyright 2018, American Chemical Society.
Fig. 3. (a) Mechanism diagram of phosphorus vacancy formation process. HRTEM images of Fe-Ni2P (b) and intensity maps of P vacancies in the corresponding regions (c) [48]. Reprinted with permission from Ref. [48]. Copyright 2023, John Wiley and Sons. In situ Raman images (d) and the EPR results (e) of the ZnOx. (f) H2O adsorption energy simulations of ZnOx with and without vacancies [49]. Reprinted with permission from Ref. [49]. Copyright 2024, Elsevier. (g) Comparison of EIS images of different samples. (h) Simulation of intermediate adsorption during OER of FeCo2Ni-Ov. (i) Reaction potentials and d-band center for different samples [52]. Reprinted with permission from Ref. [52]. Copyright 2021, Elsevier.
Fig. 4. Schematic synthesis (a) and HRTEM images (b) of Mo(SSe)2-x/G. (c) Gibbs free energy diagrams of H adsorption for different samples [55]. Reprinted with permission from Ref. [55]. Copyright 2023, Elsevier. (d) Schematic preparation of MoSe2-x/ZnSe@C with anionic vacancies and heterojunction. (e) Schematic diagram of the process of preparing vacancies by calcination. (f,g) HRTEM image of MoSe2-x/ZnSe@C, where red circles represent Se vacancies [56]. Reprinted with permission from Ref. [56]. Copyright 2023, John Wiley and Sons.
Fig. 5. (a) Simulation of electrochemical measurement process. (b) XRD plots of different voltage treated NiO. (c) CV polarization curves for different samples [60]. Reprinted with permission from Ref. [60]. Copyright 2020, Elsevier. Mechanistic diagram of the synthesis of HEOs by conventional methods (d) and low-temperature plasma methods (e). (f) Isothermal curves of N2 adsorption and desorption for different samples [61]. Reprinted with permission from Ref. [61]. Copyright 2021, John Wiley and Sons. Schematic distribution of BVO charge carriers (g) without and (h) with oxygen vacancies [62]. Reprinted with permission from Ref. [62]. Copyright 2024, Elsevier.
Fig. 6. (a) Diagram of the mechanism of oxygen vacancy formation in CeO2 [67]. Reprinted with permission from Ref. [67]. Copyright 2024, Elsevier. (b) Mechanistic diagram of oxygen vacancy formation in Co3O4 [70]. Reprinted with permission from Ref. [70]. Copyright 2016, John Wiley and Sons. (c) Single-vacancy OER mechanism diagram [71]. Reprinted with permission from Ref. [71]. Copyright 2024, John Wiley and Sons. (d,e) Multi-vacancies aggregation model diagram [72]. Reprinted with permission from Ref. [72]. Copyright 2023, AIP Publishing. (f) Synergistic model of anionic vacancies and cationic vacancies [73] Reprinted with permission from Ref. [73]. Copyright 2020, John Wiley and Sons.
Fig. 7. (a) EPR spectra of SrTiO3 at different temperatures [74]. Reprinted with permission from Ref. [74]. Copyright 2014, American Chemical Society. (b) EPR spectra of SrTiO3 at different temperatures [75]. Reprinted with permission from Ref. [75]. Copyright 2019, Elsevier. (c) STM image of the alignment status of a single S vacancy in MoS2 [76]. Reprinted with permission from Ref. [76]. Copyright 2020, American Chemical Society. (d) Comparison of the density of states of Mo atoms with different distributions of S vacancies in MoS2. STM image of the alignment status of a single S vacancy in MoS2 (e) and the image of the arrangement status of linear S vacancies in MoS2 (f) [77]. Reprinted with permission from Ref. [77]. Copyright 2017, John Wiley and Sons. (g) ESR plots for different concentrations of phosphorus doping. (h) LSV polarization curves for different PV concentrations [79]. Reprinted with permission from Ref. [79]. Copyright 2022, John Wiley and Sons. (i) CoP charge density difference cross section with and without vacancies [82]. Reprinted with permission from Ref. [82]. Copyright 2023, John Wiley and Sons.
Fig. 9. HRTEM image of F-FeCoPV@IF (a) and magnified image of the corresponding region (b) [89]. Reprinted with permission from Ref. [89]. Copyright 2023, Elsevier. (c) HAADF-STEM image in PtTe2 NSs (upper inset represents Te vacancies at certain line intensities, lower right inset represents Pt and Te atomic columns, lower left inset represents contrast visualization of vacancies in PtTe2 NSs). (d) STM diagram of Cu2O/Au (111). (e) AFM image of the presence of S vacancies in MoS2 sample, pink circle and blue circle representing the impassable current density [94]. Reprinted with permission from Ref. [94]. Copyright 2022, American Chemical Society. (f) ABF-STEM images of P-Pt/STO samples (Red dots indicate oxygen vacancies). (g) The enlarged area of the red dashed box in Figs. 9(f) and (h) the line profile along the dashed arrow in Fig. 9(g) [95]. Reprinted with permission from Ref. [95]. Copyright 2022, Elsevier.
Fig. 10. XPS spectra of N 1s (a) and O 1s (b) of Vo-Co(OH)2/CoN and comparison sample [100]. Reprinted with permission from Ref. [100]. Copyright 2023, Springer Nature. XANES spectral profile of the K-edge of Co (c) and Corresponding K3-weighted EXAFS fitting curves (d) [103]. Reprinted with permission from Ref. [103]. Copyright 2023, Elsevier. (e) EPR curves of O-MoS2 and comparison sample [106]. Reprinted with permission from Ref. [106]. Copyright 2020, Elsevier. (f) Raman spectra of L-Co3O4 and comparison sample [108]. Reprinted with permission from Ref. [108]. Copyright 2021, Elsevier. (g) In situ UV Raman spectra of Ce-LDH materials during calcination at different temperatures. (h) UV Raman spectra of different samples [109]. Reprinted with permission from Ref. [109]. Copyright 2022, Elsevier. (i) Positron annihilation spectra of N-(Zn,en)VO and comparison sample [112]. Reprinted with permission from Ref. [112]. Copyright 2022, John Wiley and Sons.
Sample | τ1 (ps) | τ2 (ps) | τ3 (ps) | I1 (%) | I2 (%) | I3 (%) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
N-(Zn,en)VO | 199 | 374 | 2.332 | 25.0 | 73.1 | 1.9 |
(Zn,en)VO | 201 | 360 | 2.189 | 32.2 | 65.4 | 2.4 |
Table 1 Positron lifetimes and relative intensities of N-(Zn,en)VO and (Zn,en)VO [113] Reprinted with permission from Ref. [113]. Copyright 2024, Elsevier.
Sample | τ1 (ps) | τ2 (ps) | τ3 (ps) | I1 (%) | I2 (%) | I3 (%) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
N-(Zn,en)VO | 199 | 374 | 2.332 | 25.0 | 73.1 | 1.9 |
(Zn,en)VO | 201 | 360 | 2.189 | 32.2 | 65.4 | 2.4 |
Fig. 11. Schematic representation of the role of anionic vacancies in OER [114]. Reprinted with permission from Ref. [114]. Copyright 2020, John Wiley and Sons.
Fig. 12. (a) TEM images of RuO2@Co3O4 samples. (b) Differential charge density images of RuO2@Co3O4 samples. (c) Density of d-orbital states for different samples [115]. Reprinted with permission from Ref. [115]. Copyright 2024, Elsevier. (d) LSV polarization curves for OER of different samples. (e) Gibbs free energy diagrams of the OER process for different sample models. (f) Projected density of d-orbital states for different samples [116]. Reprinted with permission from Ref. [116]. Copyright 2024, Elsevier. (g) Plots of the heterogeneous interface model and vacancy distribution for Co9Se8/FeNiSe. (h) LSV curve of Co9Se8/FeNiSe [117]. Reprinted with permission from Ref. [117]. Copyright 2024, Elsevier.
Fig. 13. (a) LSV polarization curves of NiFe LDHs samples with oxygen vacancies. (b) Conductivity versus potential curves for different samples [118]. Reprinted with permission from Ref. [118]. Copyright 2023, American Chemical Society. (c) Nyquist plots for different samples. (d) Ea values for different samples [119]. Reprinted with permission from Ref. [119]. Copyright 2022, John Wiley and Sons. (e) LSV polarization curves of different samples. (f) Differential charge density images of NiFe2O4-Vo-P samples. (g) OER Gibbs free energy of different samples at different potentials [120]. Reprinted with permission from Ref. [120]. Copyright 2023, Elsevier.
Fig. 14. (a) Tafel slopes for different samples. (b) Geometrical configuration of different samples. (c) Free energy diagrams of the HER process for different samples [121]. Reprinted with permission from Ref. [121]. Copyright 2021, Elsevier. (d) OER LSV polarization curves for different samples. (e) XPS plots of O 1s from different samples [122]. Reprinted with permission from Ref. [122]. Copyright 2022, American Chemical Society. (f) DOS plots of different samples [123]. Reprinted with permission from Ref. [123]. Copyright 2022, John Wiley and Sons. (g) Relationship between Sr and O vacancies in the OER process. (h) Difference in adsorption energy of OH* intermediates between samples [124]. Reprinted with permission from Ref. [124]. Copyright 2023, Elsevier.
Fig. 15. Three mechanisms of OER two-dimensional activity diagram AEM (a), LOM-OVSM (b) and LOM-SMSM (c). (d) Comparison of theoretical and actual overpotential [125]. (e) OER mechanism diagram for Ni0.3Fe0.7-LDH@NF (LOM). (f) Schematic diagram of OER relative performance of different catalysts. (g) OER free energy barrier diagram of different surfaces of NiFe-LDH by LOM [126]. Reprinted with permission from Ref. [126]. Copyright 2023, Elsevier.
Fig. 16. (a) Water molecular adsorption and charge density of NiCo2O4 sample with oxygen vacancy. (b) LSV polarization curve of different NiCo2O4 nanosheets. (c) XRD of NiCo2O4 nanosheets with oxygen vacancies and bulk NiCo2O4 [138]. (d) O 1s XPS spectra of pristine and reduced Co3O4 nanosheets (e) Polarization curves of as-prepared O-vacancy-rich Co3O4 (O-Co3O4) with other catalysts. (f) The calculated OER free energy of the Co3O4 structure with/without oxygen vacancy [145]. Reprinted with permission from Ref. [145]. Copyright 2017, John Wiley and Sons. (g) Comparison of OER LSV curves of Co0.025-NiFe-LDH/NF and NiFe-LDH/NF. (h) O 1s XPS spectra of Co0.025-NiFe-LDH/NF and NiFe-LDH. (i) Partial density of states of Co0.025-NiFe-LDH (left) and NiFe-LDH (right) [135]. Reprinted with permission from Ref. [135]. Copyright 2021, Elsevier.
Fig. 17. (a) Fourier transform filtered atomic resolution images of different diffraction points. (b) Represents the different atomic intensity distribution images in (a). (c) Polarization curves for different samples. (d) Raman spectra of different samples. (e) Gibbs free energy for the Co9S8-ZnS model at U = 0 [146]. Reprinted with permission from Ref. [146]. Copyright 2022, American Chemical Society. (f) EPR images of different samples. (g) Polarization curves for different samples. (h) Adsorption model of Vs-(Fe, Ni)3S4. (i) Gibbs free energy of different samples during OER at Fe and Ni sites [147]. Reprinted with permission from Ref. [147]. Copyright 2024, Elsevier.
Fig. 18. (a) HRTEM images of CoXPV@NC samples. (b) Mechanism diagram of P vacancy formation in CoXPV@NC samples. (c) In-situ Raman spectra of CoXPV@NC samples [148]. Reprinted with permission from Ref. [148]. Copyright 2020, Elsevier. (d) EPR images of samples at different reduction times. (e) Comparison of LSV curves of different samples. (f) XPS curve of O 1s of samples after OER [152]. Reprinted with permission from Ref. [152]. Copyright 2021, Elsevier. (g) OER polarization curves for LSV. (h) Application resistance diagrams for different samples. (i) Comparative OER kinetic studies of different samples [155]. Reprinted with permission from Ref. [155]. Copyright 2023, John Wiley and Sons.
Fig. 19. (a) Comparison of polarization curves standardized by ECSA. (b) Comparison of total DOS for different samples. (c) OER Gibbs free energy of FeOOH and Se2(2C)-FeOOH [82]. Reprinted with permission from Ref. [82]. Copyright 2023, John Wiley and Sons. (d) R-space Ag K-edge EXAFS spectra of AgSA-NiSe2. (e) In situ Raman spectroscopy of AgSA-NiSe2 samples. (f) Free energy diagrams of NiSe2 and AgSA-NiSe2 OER processes [166]. Reprinted with permission from Ref. [166]. Copyright 2024, Elsevier. (g) Local HRTEM of Mo-Co9Se8@NiSe/NF-60 sample. (h) Comparison of EPR images of different samples. (i) Comparison of LSV polarization curves of different samples. (j) Comparison of d-band centers for different samples [168]. Reprinted with permission from Ref. [168]. Copyright 2023, Royal Society of Chemistry.
Fig. 20. (a) Comparison of EPR of different samples. (b) HRTEM images of o-CoTe2?P@HPC/CNTs samples. (c) Comparison of LSV of OER for different samples [170]. Reprinted with permission from Ref. [170]. Copyright 2020, American Chemical Society. (d) Top and side views of the G/BNNs sample and the corresponding charge density distribution. (e) Energy band structure of G/BNNs. (f) Comparison of LSV of OER for different samples [171]. Reprinted with permission from Ref. [171]. Copyright 2023, John Wiley and Sons.
Catalysts | Vacancy | Performance | Ref. |
---|---|---|---|
Ru/d-NiFe LDH | OV | 220 mV/10 mA cm-2 | [ |
Co3O4 | OV | 320 mV/10 mA cm-2 | [ |
300-h/Co/CC | OV | 280 mV/10 mA cm-2 | [ |
Ni0.3Fe0.7-LDH@NF | OV | 184 mV/10 mA cm-2 | [ |
S-CeO2 | OV | 190 mV/10 mA cm-2 | [ |
N-ZnCo2O4-δ-350 | OV | 406 mV/10 mA cm-2 | [ |
v-NiFe LDH | OV | 210 mV/10 mA cm-2 | [ |
NiCoPi | OV | 254 mV/10 mA cm-2 | [ |
Co(OH)2/WOx | OV | 208 mV/10 mA cm-2 | [ |
Ni-S-5 | OV | 142 mV/10 mA cm-2 | [ |
CoMoO4-Ov | OV | 296 mV/10 mA cm-2 | [ |
HEOs-Ov | OV | 284 mV/10 mA cm-2 | [ |
Sr2Co2O5 | OV | 370 mV/10 mA cm-2 | [ |
2D d-MHOFs | OV | 207 mV/10 mA cm-2 | [ |
VO-Cubic-Co3O4 | OV | 375 mV/10 mA cm-2 | [ |
β-FeOOH | OV | 232 mV/10 mA cm-2 | [ |
Fe1Co1Ox | OV | 225 mV/10 mA cm-2 | [ |
Co3O4 | OV | 367 mV/10 mA cm-2 | [ |
MNC | OV | 250 mV/10 mA cm-2 | [ |
Fe2O3@CeO2-OV | OV | 172 mV/10 mA cm-2 | [ |
Fe-Ni2P(PV) | PV | 290 mV/10 mA cm-2 | [ |
V-doped NiCoP | PV | 246 mV/10 mA cm-2 | [ |
D-Ni5P4|Fe | PV | 217 mV/10 mA cm-2 | [ |
CoP-B1 | PV | 297 mV/10 mA cm-2 | [ |
Fe-Ni2P | PV | 190 mV/10 mA cm-2 | [ |
Ni2P/Cu3P | PV | 370 mV/10 mA cm-2 | [ |
VP-Co-MoP@MXene | PV | 265 mV/10 mA cm-2 | [ |
Fe-Ni2P-VP | PV | 289 mV/10 mA cm-2 | [ |
NiFe(OH)x/NiPx/NF | PV | 220 mV/10 mA cm-2 | [ |
Co0.68Fe0.32P-60 | PV | 259 mV/10 mA cm-2 | [ |
P-NiS2-500 | SV | 340 mV/10 mA cm-2 | [ |
P-CoS | SV | 280 mV/10 mA cm-2 | [ |
SV-Ni3S2-xPx-4 | SV | 216 mV/10 mA cm-2 | [ |
Bi2S3 | SV | 374 mV/10 mA cm-2 | [ |
H-VS-Co3S4 | SV | 270 mV/10 mA cm-2 | [ |
Ru-FeNi2S4 | SV | 253 mV/10 mA cm-2 | [ |
VS-Ni3S2/MoS2 | SV | 180 mV/10 mA cm-2 | [ |
Co9S8-ZnS/NTC | SV | 290 mV/10 mA cm-2 | [ |
d-PtSe2 | SeV | 310 mV/10 mA cm-2 | [ |
Co0.85Se1-x@C | SeV | 231 mV/10 mA cm-2 | [ |
A-NiSe2|P | SeV | 272 mV/10 mA cm-2 | [ |
CoSe2 | SeV | 284 mV/10 mA cm-2 | [ |
o-CoTe2|P@HPC/CNTs | TeV | 241 mV/10 mA cm-2 | [ |
Table 2 Summary of OER catalysts optimized for different anionic vacancies.
Catalysts | Vacancy | Performance | Ref. |
---|---|---|---|
Ru/d-NiFe LDH | OV | 220 mV/10 mA cm-2 | [ |
Co3O4 | OV | 320 mV/10 mA cm-2 | [ |
300-h/Co/CC | OV | 280 mV/10 mA cm-2 | [ |
Ni0.3Fe0.7-LDH@NF | OV | 184 mV/10 mA cm-2 | [ |
S-CeO2 | OV | 190 mV/10 mA cm-2 | [ |
N-ZnCo2O4-δ-350 | OV | 406 mV/10 mA cm-2 | [ |
v-NiFe LDH | OV | 210 mV/10 mA cm-2 | [ |
NiCoPi | OV | 254 mV/10 mA cm-2 | [ |
Co(OH)2/WOx | OV | 208 mV/10 mA cm-2 | [ |
Ni-S-5 | OV | 142 mV/10 mA cm-2 | [ |
CoMoO4-Ov | OV | 296 mV/10 mA cm-2 | [ |
HEOs-Ov | OV | 284 mV/10 mA cm-2 | [ |
Sr2Co2O5 | OV | 370 mV/10 mA cm-2 | [ |
2D d-MHOFs | OV | 207 mV/10 mA cm-2 | [ |
VO-Cubic-Co3O4 | OV | 375 mV/10 mA cm-2 | [ |
β-FeOOH | OV | 232 mV/10 mA cm-2 | [ |
Fe1Co1Ox | OV | 225 mV/10 mA cm-2 | [ |
Co3O4 | OV | 367 mV/10 mA cm-2 | [ |
MNC | OV | 250 mV/10 mA cm-2 | [ |
Fe2O3@CeO2-OV | OV | 172 mV/10 mA cm-2 | [ |
Fe-Ni2P(PV) | PV | 290 mV/10 mA cm-2 | [ |
V-doped NiCoP | PV | 246 mV/10 mA cm-2 | [ |
D-Ni5P4|Fe | PV | 217 mV/10 mA cm-2 | [ |
CoP-B1 | PV | 297 mV/10 mA cm-2 | [ |
Fe-Ni2P | PV | 190 mV/10 mA cm-2 | [ |
Ni2P/Cu3P | PV | 370 mV/10 mA cm-2 | [ |
VP-Co-MoP@MXene | PV | 265 mV/10 mA cm-2 | [ |
Fe-Ni2P-VP | PV | 289 mV/10 mA cm-2 | [ |
NiFe(OH)x/NiPx/NF | PV | 220 mV/10 mA cm-2 | [ |
Co0.68Fe0.32P-60 | PV | 259 mV/10 mA cm-2 | [ |
P-NiS2-500 | SV | 340 mV/10 mA cm-2 | [ |
P-CoS | SV | 280 mV/10 mA cm-2 | [ |
SV-Ni3S2-xPx-4 | SV | 216 mV/10 mA cm-2 | [ |
Bi2S3 | SV | 374 mV/10 mA cm-2 | [ |
H-VS-Co3S4 | SV | 270 mV/10 mA cm-2 | [ |
Ru-FeNi2S4 | SV | 253 mV/10 mA cm-2 | [ |
VS-Ni3S2/MoS2 | SV | 180 mV/10 mA cm-2 | [ |
Co9S8-ZnS/NTC | SV | 290 mV/10 mA cm-2 | [ |
d-PtSe2 | SeV | 310 mV/10 mA cm-2 | [ |
Co0.85Se1-x@C | SeV | 231 mV/10 mA cm-2 | [ |
A-NiSe2|P | SeV | 272 mV/10 mA cm-2 | [ |
CoSe2 | SeV | 284 mV/10 mA cm-2 | [ |
o-CoTe2|P@HPC/CNTs | TeV | 241 mV/10 mA cm-2 | [ |
Fig. 21. Prospective images of anionic vacancies on OER catalysts [211?-213]. Reprinted with permission from Ref. [212]. Copyright 2023, John Wiley and Sons. Reprinted with permission from Ref. [213]. Copyright 2024, American Chemical Society.
|
[1] | Minfei Xie, Xing Ji, Huaying Meng, Nanbing Jiang, Zhenyu Luo, Qianqian Huang, Geng Sun, Yunhuai Zhang, Peng Xiao. The role of titanium at the interface of hematite photoanode in multisite mechanism: Reactive site or cocatalyst site? [J]. Chinese Journal of Catalysis, 2024, 64(9): 77-86. |
[2] | Hong-Rui Zhu, Hui-Min Xu, Chen-Jin Huang, Zhi-Jie Zhang, Qi-Ni Zhan, Ting-Yu Shuai, Gao-Ren Li. Recent advances of the catalysts for photoelectrocatalytic oxygen evolution and CO2 reduction reactions [J]. Chinese Journal of Catalysis, 2024, 62(7): 53-107. |
[3] | Qingyun Lv, Weiwei Zhang, Zhipeng Long, Jiantao Wang, Xingli Zou, Wei Ren, Long Hou, Xionggang Lu, Yufeng Zhao, Xing Yu, Xi Li. Large-current polarization-engineered FeOOH@NiOOH electrocatalyst with stable Fe sites for large-current oxygen evolution reaction [J]. Chinese Journal of Catalysis, 2024, 62(7): 254-264. |
[4] | Yuanlong Tan, Yafeng Zhang, Ya Gao, Jingyuan Ma, Han Zhao, Qingqing Gu, Yang Su, Xiaoyan Xu, Aiqin Wang, Bing Yang, Guo-Xu Zhang, Xiao Yan Liu, Tao Zhang. Redox-driven surface generation of highly active Pd/PdO interface boosting low-temperature methane combustion [J]. Chinese Journal of Catalysis, 2024, 60(5): 242-252. |
[5] | Adel Al-Salihy, Ce Liang, Abdulwahab Salah, Abdel-Basit Al-Odayni, Ziang Lu, Mengxin Chen, Qianqian Liu, Ping Xu. Ultralow Ru-doped NiMoO4@Ni3(PO4)2 core-shell nanostructures for improved overall water splitting [J]. Chinese Journal of Catalysis, 2024, 60(5): 360-375. |
[6] | Jingya Guo, Wei Liu, Wenzhe Shang, Duanhui Si, Chao Zhu, Jinwen Hu, Cuncun Xin, Xusheng Cheng, Songlin Zhang, Suchan Song, Xiuyun Wang, Yantao Shi. Engineering fully exposed edge-plane sites on carbon-based electrodes for efficient water oxidation [J]. Chinese Journal of Catalysis, 2024, 60(5): 272-283. |
[7] | Lili Chen, Yanheng Hao, Jianyi Chu, Song Liu, Fenghua Bai, Wenhao Luo. Electrocatalytic nitrate reduction to ammonia: A perspective on Fe/Cu-containing catalysts [J]. Chinese Journal of Catalysis, 2024, 58(3): 25-36. |
[8] | Jian Yiing Loh, Joel Jie Foo, Feng Ming Yap, Hanfeng Liang, Wee-Jun Ong. Unleashing the versatility of porous nanoarchitectures: A voyage for sustainable electrocatalytic water splitting [J]. Chinese Journal of Catalysis, 2024, 58(3): 37-85. |
[9] | Yingjie Guo, Shilong Li, Wasihun Abebe, Jingyang Wang, Lei Shi, Di Liu, Shenlong Zhao. Non-derivatized metal-organic framework nanosheets for water electrolysis: Fundamentals, regulation strategies and recent advances [J]. Chinese Journal of Catalysis, 2024, 67(12): 21-53. |
[10] | Siyu Chen, Jingqi Guan. Structural regulation strategies of nitrogen reduction electrocatalysts [J]. Chinese Journal of Catalysis, 2024, 66(11): 20-52. |
[11] | Long Song, Jingqi Chi, Junheng Tang, Xiaobin Liu, Zhenyu Xiao, Zexing Wu, Lei Wang. Anode design principles for efficient seawater electrolysis and inhibition of chloride oxidation [J]. Chinese Journal of Catalysis, 2024, 66(11): 53-75. |
[12] | Zhaoping Shi, Ziang Wang, Hongxiang Wu, Meiling Xiao, Changpeng Liu, Wei Xing. High-density Ir single sites from rapid ligand transformation for efficient water electrolysis [J]. Chinese Journal of Catalysis, 2024, 66(11): 223-232. |
[13] | Huan Liu, Shaoxiong He, Jiafu Qu, Yahui Cai, Xiaogang Yang, Chang Ming Li, Jundie Hu. Dual-channel redox reactions for photocatalytic H2-evolution coupled with photoreforming oxidation of waste materials [J]. Chinese Journal of Catalysis, 2024, 65(10): 1-39. |
[14] | Yi Wang, Shuo Wang, Yunfan Fu, Jiaqi Sang, Yipeng Zang, Pengfei Wei, Hefei Li, Guoxiong Wang, Xinhe Bao. Synergistic catalytic conversion of nitrate into ammonia on copper phthalocyanine and FeNC two-component catalyst [J]. Chinese Journal of Catalysis, 2024, 56(1): 104-113. |
[15] | Yan Hong, Qi Wang, Ziwang Kan, Yushuo Zhang, Jing Guo, Siqi Li, Song Liu, Bin Li. Recent progress in advanced catalysts for electrochemical nitrogen reduction reaction to ammonia [J]. Chinese Journal of Catalysis, 2023, 52(9): 50-78. |
Viewed | ||||||
Full text |
|
|||||
Abstract |
|
|||||