多金属氧酸盐材料在二氧化碳电催化还原领域中的研究进展

doi:10.1016/S1872-2067(20)63718-4

催化学报 ›› 2021, Vol. 42 ›› Issue (6): 920-937.DOI: 10.1016/S1872-2067(20)63718-4

多金属氧酸盐材料在二氧化碳电催化还原领域中的研究进展

都京^a,†, 马媛媛^d,†, 谭华桥^a^,^*(), 康振辉^b^,^c^,^#(), 李阳光^a^,^$()

^a东北师范大学化学学院, 多酸科学教育部重点实验室, 吉林长春130024
^b东北师范大学先进材料研究院, 吉林长春130024
^c苏州大学功能纳米与软物质研究院, 江苏省碳基功能材料与器件重点实验室, 江苏苏州215213
^d河北师范大学化学与材料科学学院, 河北石家庄050024

收稿日期:2020-07-22 接受日期:2020-09-03 出版日期:2021-06-18 发布日期:2021-01-30
通讯作者: 谭华桥,康振辉,李阳光
作者简介:
^†共同第一作者.
基金资助:
国家自然科学基金(21671036);国家自然科学基金(21771033);国家自然科学基金(21771132);国家自然科学基金(21901060);国家自然科学基金(51725204);国家自然科学基金(51972216);国家自然科学基金(52041202);中央高校基础研究基金项目(2412018BJ001);中央高校基础研究基金项目(2412018ZD007);中央高校基础研究基金项目(2412018QD005);国家MCF能源研究与开发计划(2018YFE0306105);国家自然科学基金创新研究群体项目(51821002);江苏省自然科学基金(BK20190041);江苏省自然科学基金(BK20190828);广东省重点领域研发计划项目(2019B010933001);苏州纳米科技协同创新中心;江苏省高等学校重点学科建设项目;111计划;吉林省科技发展计划项目(20190201206JC);吉林省教育厅基金项目(JJKH20190268KJ);高等学校博士学科点专项科研基金(20123201110018);多酸科学教育部重点实验室开放项目

Progress of electrochemical CO₂ reduction reactions over polyoxometalate-based materials

Jing Du^a,†, Yuan-Yuan Ma^d,†, Huaqiao Tan^a^,^*(), Zhen-Hui Kang^b^,^c^,^#(), Yangguang Li^a^,^$()

^aKey Laboratory of Polyoxometalate Science of the Ministry of Education, Faculty of Chemistry, Northeast Normal University, Changchun 130024, Jilin, China
^bInstitute of Advanced Materials, Northeast Normal University, Changchun 130024, Jilin, China
^cInstitute of Functional Nano and Soft Materials (FUNSOM), Jiangsu Key Laboratory for Carbon-based Functional Materials and Devices, Soochow University, Suzhou 215123, Jiangsu, China
^dCollege of Chemistry and Material Science, Hebei Normal University, Shijiazhuang 050024, Hebei, China

Received:2020-07-22 Accepted:2020-09-03 Online:2021-06-18 Published:2021-01-30
Contact: Huaqiao Tan,Zhen-Hui Kang,Yangguang Li
About author:^$E-mail: liyg658@nenu.edu.cn
^#E-mail: kangzh@nenu.edu.cn, zhkang@suda.edu.cn;
^*E-mail: tanhq870@nenu.edu.cn;
First author contact:
^†These authors contributed equally.
Supported by:
National Natural Science Foundation of China(21671036);National Natural Science Foundation of China(21771033);National Natural Science Foundation of China(21771132);National Natural Science Foundation of China(21901060);National Natural Science Foundation of China(51725204);National Natural Science Foundation of China(51972216);National Natural Science Foundation of China(52041202);Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities(2412018BJ001);Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities(2412018ZD007);Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities(2412018QD005);National MCF Energy R&D Program(2018YFE0306105);Innovative Research Group Project of the National Natural Science Foundation of China(51821002);Natural Science Foundation of Jiangsu Province(BK20190041);Natural Science Foundation of Jiangsu Province(BK20190828);Key-Area Research and Development Program of Guangdong Province(2019B010933001);Collaborative Innovation Center of Suzhou Nano Science & Technology;Priority Academic Program Development of Jiangsu Higher Education Institutions (PAPD);111 Project;Scientific Development Project of Jilin Province(20190201206JC);Foundation of Jilin Educational Committee(JJKH20190268KJ);Specialized Research Fund for the Doctoral Program of Higher Education(20123201110018);Opening Project of Key Laboratory of Polyoxometalate Science of Ministry of Education

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

随着工业发展和全球人口的持续增长, 人类对化石燃料的消耗日益增加, 从而导致大气中二氧化碳含量的显著增加以及与之相伴的一系列环境问题. 电化学还原二氧化碳制备高附加值的燃料和化学品具有稳定的效率和较高的经济可行性等特点, 目前已成为一种有前景的策略来缓解当前全球面临的能源短缺和气候变暖问题. 然而, 电催化二氧化碳还原过程存在反应能垒高和复杂的多电子/质子耦合过程等不足, 因此, 合理有效的电催化剂设计成为该领域的关键问题. 近年, 理解和明确电化学二氧化碳还原反应过程的活性起源、选择性调控机制和催化反应机理已成为高效电催化剂设计过程中的重要指导原则. 作为一类独特的纳米尺度的金属氧簇, 多金属氧酸盐(多酸)已成为二氧化碳还原领域的热点材料. 尤其是, 多酸明确的结构、优越的电子/质子存储转移能力和二氧化碳吸附活化能力有助于探究二氧化碳还原反应过程中的活性起源和构效机制. 因此, 利用多酸阐明电化学二氧化碳还原反应中的这些关键问题对于开发高效、可实用化的电催化剂意义重大.
本文综述了近年多酸在电催化二氧化碳还原反应中取得的进展, 重点介绍了多酸阴离子均相分子催化剂、多酸基无机-有机杂化材料催化剂、多酸电解质溶液、多酸-纳米复合材料在电催化二氧化碳还原反应中的应用. 利用密度泛函理论结合原位实验证据推测了可能的反应机理, 探讨了多酸对电催化活性和产物选择性的影响, 揭示了电子/质子存储-转移过程和多酸表面修饰工程在电催化二氧化碳还原过程中的重要作用. 最后, 本文还分析了多酸基材料存在的问题与面临的挑战, 并对多酸基材料在二氧化碳还原领域的未来发展进行了展望, 这对理解电催化二氧化碳还原反应中的关键步骤和开发新型高效的电催化二氧化碳还原电催化剂具有启发意义.

关键词: 多金属氧酸盐, 电催化, 二氧化碳还原, 电子转移, 机理

Abstract:

Electrochemical CO₂ reduction to value-added fuels and chemicals is recognized as a promising strategy to alleviate energy shortages and global warming owing to its high efficiency and economic feasibility. Recently, understanding the activity origin, selectivity regulation, and reaction mechanisms of CO₂reduction reactions (CO₂RRs) has become the focus of efficient electrocatalyst design. Polyoxometalates (POMs), a unique class of nanosized metal-oxo clusters, are promising candidates for the development of efficient CO₂RR electrocatalysts and, owing to their well-defined structure, remarkable electron/proton storage and transfer ability, and capacities for adsorption and activation of CO₂, are ideal models for investigating the activity origin and reaction mechanisms of CO₂RR electrocatalysts. In this review, we focus on the activity origin and mechanism of CO₂RRs and survey recent advances that were achieved by employing POMs in electrocatalytic CO₂RRs. We highlight the significant roles of POMs in the electrocatalytic CO₂RR process and the main factors influencing selectivity regulation and catalytic CO₂RR performance, including the electrolyte, electron-transfer process, and surface characteristics. Finally, we offer a perspective of the advantages and future challenges of POM-based materials in electrocatalytic CO₂ reduction that could inform new advancements in this promising research field.

Key words: Polyoxometalate, Electrocatalysis, CO₂ reduction, Electron transfer, Mechanism

都京, 马媛媛, 谭华桥, 康振辉, 李阳光. 多金属氧酸盐材料在二氧化碳电催化还原领域中的研究进展[J]. 催化学报, 2021, 42(6): 920-937.

Jing Du, Yuan-Yuan Ma, Huaqiao Tan, Zhen-Hui Kang, Yangguang Li. Progress of electrochemical CO₂ reduction reactions over polyoxometalate-based materials[J]. Chinese Journal of Catalysis, 2021, 42(6): 920-937.

×
扫码分享

导出引用管理器 EndNote|Ris|BibTeX

链接本文: https://www.cjcatal.com/CN/10.1016/S1872-2067(20)63718-4

https://www.cjcatal.com/CN/Y2021/V42/I6/920

图/表 17

Scheme 1. The various features of POMs including an adjustable structure, modifiability, electrochemical redox properties, and catalytic activity.

Table 1 Electrochemical potentials of reactions that may occur during electrocatalytic CO2 reduction in aqueous solutions.

Possible half-reactions in electrochemical CO₂RRs	Electrode potentials (V vs. SHE)
CO₂ (g) + e^- → ^*COO^-	-1.90
CO₂ (g) + 2H⁺ + 2e^- → CO (g) + H₂O (l)	-0.52
CO₂ (g) + 8H⁺ + 8e^- → CH₄ (g) + 2H₂O (l)	-0.24
2CO₂ (g) + 12H⁺ + 12e^- → C₂H₄ (g) + 4H₂O (l)	-0.34
CO₂ (g) + 2H⁺ + 2e^- → HCOOH (l)	-0.61
CO₂ (g) + 4H⁺ + 4e^- → HCHO (l) + H₂O (l)	-0.51
CO₂ (g) + 6H⁺ (l) + 6e^- → CH₃OH (l) + H₂O (l)	-0.38
2H⁺ + 2e^- → H₂ (g)	-0.42

Fig. 1. Kinetic volcano plot for CO evolution at a 0.35 V overpotential from the (211) step of TMs. The TMs fall along a trendline that does not pass over the top of the volcano. However, the noble metals occupy near-optimum positions along this trend line. The speci?c CO evolution current for the ChCODH II and MbCODH enzyme models is comparable or better than those of the noble metals. Reprinted with the permission of Ref. [75]. Copyright 2013, American Chemical Society.

Scheme 2. The fascinating properties of POMs informing the potential application of POM-based materials in electrochemical CO2 reduction reactions.

Fig. 2. (a) Visible spectra of tetraheptylammonium salts of (I) α-[SiW11O39Co(OH2)]6-, (II) α-[SiW11O39Co(_)]6-, and (III) a-[SiW11O39Co(CO2)]6- in toluene. (b) Infrared spectrum of the tetraheptylammonium salt of α-[SiW11O39Co(CO2)]6- in CCl4. The two peaks marked with arrows appear after the CO2 is bubbled, and are assigned to vibrations of CO2 complexed to cobalt. (c) Difference spectrum between α-[SiW11O39Co(CO2)]6- and α-[SiW11O39Co(_)]6-. The peak at 2335 cm-1 originates from the CO2 gas dissolved in the solvent. (d) 13C NMR spectra of 0.1 M α-[SiW11O39Co(CO2)]6- in toluene at temperatures from -40 °C to + 35 °C. (e-h) Proposed hypothetical bonding modes for CO2 with cobalt in α-[SiW11O39Co(CO2)]6-, stabilized by hydrogen bonding utilizing both hydrogen atoms from water. Reprinted with the permission of Ref. [88]. Copyright 1998, American Chemical Society (ACS).

Fig. 3. Synthesis of the organometallic derivative [α-H2PW11O39{RhIIICp*(OH2)}]3- (the POM skeleton is displayed in polyhedral representation). Reprinted with the permission of Ref. [98]. Copyright 2019 WILEY-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA, Weinheim.

Fig. 4. (a) Structural representation of Mn(III), Ni(II), and Zn(II) μ-(meso-5,10,15,20-tetra(pirydil)porphyrin)tetrakis{bis(bipyridine)chloride ruthenium(II)}; Linear sweep voltammogram of bare ITO electrode (b), [MnIIITRP]5+/[SiW12O40]4- multilayer modi?ed electrode (c) [ZnIITRP]4+/[SiW12O40]4- multilayer modi?ed electrode (d) and [NiIITRP]4+/[SiW12O40]4- multilayer modi?ed electrode the in presence (solid line) and absence (dash line) of CO2 and 0.1 M NaClO4 solution at 5 mV s-1 (e). Reprinted with the permission of Ref. [100]. Copyright 2013 Elsevier Ltd.

Table 2 Electrocatalytic CO2RR activity and products of [MTRP]/[SiW12O40]/ITO electrodes.

Electrode	Products and TOF (s^-1)
Electrode	CO	HCOOH	CH₃OH
[Mn^IIITRP]^5-/[SiW₁₂O₄₀]^4-/ITO	N.D.^a	0.48 ^b	0.023
[Zn^IITRP]^5-/[SiW₁₂O₄₀]^4-/ITO	0.0037	N.D. ^a	8.2
[Ni^IITRP]^5-/[SiW₁₂O₄₀]^4-/ITO	0.24	0.083	N.D. ^a

Fig. 5. (a) Schematic illustration of the structures of M-PMOFs (M = Co, Fe, Ni, Zn). M-PMOFs consist of 4-connection TCPP linkers and zigzag POM chains; (b) Linear sweep voltammetry (LSV) curves of M-PMOFs; (c) Faradaic ef?ciencies for CO; (d) Durability test of Co-PMOF at a potential of -0.8 V vs. RHE. Reprinted with the permission of Ref. [37]. Copyright 2018, Springer Nature.

Fig. 6. (a) Schematic diagram of the reaction mechanism induced by POM-MnL; (b) TEM image of SiW12-MnL/KB (inset: HR-TEM image of SiW12-MnL/KB, scale bar: 5 nm); (c) The CV curves for MnL/KB, CsSiW12/KB, and SiW12-MnL/KB in 0.5 mol L-1 N2-saturated KHCO3 at a 0.05 V s-1 scan rate; (d) The LSV curves of SiW12-MnL/KB and MnL/KB in 0.5 M N2-(black curve) or CO2-(red curve) saturated KHCO3 electrolyte; (e) The FE for CO at di?erent potentials for MnL/KB and SiW12-MnL/KB (the line is drawn only to guide the eye); (f) The FEs for CO and H2 at the overpotential of the highest FE for CO of MnL/KB and POM-MnL/KB. Reprinted with the permission of Ref. [101]. Copyright 2020, Royal Society of Chemistry (RSC).

Fig. 7. Square reaction scheme representing the interaction between the reduced forms of [α-SiW12O40]4- and CO2 during electrochemical reduction. [α-SiW12O40]4- is represented as SiW4- for convenience. Reprinted with the permission of Ref. [102]. Copyright 2016 WILEY‐VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA, Weinheim.

Fig. 8. The Faradaic e?ciencies of products of In cathode in SiW9V3 (a) and SiW11Mn (b) electrolyte. (c) XPS spectra of In 3d for the indium electrode before and after electrolysis with 1 and 12 h. (d) XPS spectra of W 4f for the indium electrode after 1 h electrolysis. (e) The FTIR spectroscopy characterization for the 2 mM SiW9V3-0.1 M Na2SO4 electrolyte during electrolysis, in which the peak at 2071 cm-1 corresponds to the adsorbed CO*. (f) Current density with electrolysis time at different potential for 1 h; The inset is the current density with electrolysis time at -1.15 V vs. Ag/AgCl for 12 h. Reprinted with the permission of Refs. [103,104]. Copyright 2020 Elsevier Ltd.

Fig. 9. (a) SEM images of Ag-PMo nanocomposite-modi?ed ITO glasses; (b) TEM images of Ag-PMo nanocomposites, inset: Schematic diagram of Ag-PMo catalytic CO2 reduction; (c) Comparison of cyclic voltammograms obtained at an Ag-PMo nanocomposite-modi?ed GC electrode in DMF (0.1 M [n-Bu4N]PF6) with 0.5% (v/v) added H2O under a CO2 (black line) or a N2b(red line) atmosphere (Scan rate: 100 mV s-1); (d) Potentiostatic i-t curves obtained at an Ag-PMo nanocomposite modified GC electrode in DMF (0.1 M [n-Bu4N]PF6) with 0.5% (v/v) added water under CO2 or N2 atmospheres. Applied potential: -1.9 V vs. Fc0/+. Reprinted with the permission of Ref. [105]. Copyright 2018, American Chemical Society.

Fig. 10. (a) SEM image of the film deposited on an FTO electrode in aqueous 0.25 M HNO3 solutions containing 1.0 mM Bi(NO3)3; (b) Atomic force microscopy (AFM) image and height profile of Bi-PMo nanosheets; (c) Raman spectra of Bi-PMo nanosheets before (black) and after electrolysis (red), and H3PMo12O40 (blue); (d,e) High-resolution XPS spectra recorded for Mo 3d and Bi 4f regions of the Bi-PMo nanosheets; (f) Cyclic voltammograms obtained for Bi-PMo nanosheet (solid lines) and Bi nano-dendrite (dash lines) modified GC electrodes in CO2-(black) or N2-(red) saturated 0.5 M NaHCO3 aqueous solutions, scan rate: 0.1 V s-1; (g) Faradaic efficiencies for formate produced on Bi-PMo nanosheets (black) and Bi nano-dendrites (red) at various applied potentials in CO2-saturated 0.5 M NaHCO3 solutions; (h) Long term stability study of Bi-PMo nanosheets during controlled potential electrolysis at -0.86 V vs. RHE in a CO2-saturated 0.5 M NaHCO3 solution; (i) Tafel plots obtained for Bi-PMo nanosheets (black) and Bi nano-dendrites (red). Reprinted with the permission of Ref. [106]. Copyright 2019 Wiley‐VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA, Weinheim.

Table 3 Performance of major POM-based electrocatalysts and other representative electrocatalysts used in electrocatalytic CO2RRs.

Electrocatalyst	Electrolyte	Potential	Principal product	FE (%)	TON	Ref.
(TOA)₆[α-SiW₁₁O₃₉Co(_)]	CH₂Cl₂	-1.5 V vs. Hg₂Cl₂/Hg	CO	18	—	[97]
(TBA)₃[H₂PW₁₁O₃₉{Rh^IIICp^*(OH₂)}]	CH₃CN	-1.8 V vs. Hg₂Cl₂/Hg	HCOOH	4.5	0.8	[98]
[Cp*Rh^III(bpy)Cl]⁺	CH₃CN	-1.8 V vs. Hg₂Cl₂/Hg	HCOOH	60	18	[98]
[Mn(III)TRP]⁵⁺/[SiW₁₂O₄₀]^4-/ITO	0.1 M NaClO₄	-0.8 V vs. Ag/AgCl	HCOOH	—	1.06 × 10⁴	[100]
[Zn(II)TRP]⁴⁺/[SiW₁₂O₄₀]^4-/ITO	0.1 M NaClO₄	-0.8 V vs. Ag/AgCl	Methanol	—	1.76 × 10⁵	[100]
[Ni(II)TRP]⁵⁺/[SiW₁₂O₄₀]^4-/ITO	0.1 M NaClO₄	-0.8 V vs. Ag/AgCl	CO	—	3.85 × 10³	[100]
[Ni(II)TRP]⁵⁺	DMF	-0.8 V vs. SHE	CO	—	—	[107]
Co-PMOF	0.5 M KHCO₃	-0.8 V vs. RHE	CO	98.7	7693	[37]
Fe-PMOF	0.5 M KHCO₃	-0.8 V vs. RHE	CO	28.8	—	[37]
Ni-PMOF	0.5 M KHCO₃	-0.8 V vs. RHE	CO	18.5	—	[37]
Zn-PMOF	0.5 M KHCO₃	-0.8 V vs. RHE	CO	0.95	—	[37]
Co-TMCP	0.5 M KHCO₃	-0.9 V vs. RHE	CO	~50	—	[37]
MOF-525(Co)	0.5 M KHCO₃	-0.8 V vs. RHE	CO	47.9	—	[37]
CoPPC/CNT	0.5 M KHCO₃	-0.58 V vs. RHE	CO	~90	—	[108]
SiW₁₂-MnL/KB	0.5 M KHCO₃	-0.72 V vs. RHE	CO	95	—	[101]
PW₁₂-MnL/KB	0.5 M KHCO₃	-0.72 V vs. RHE	CO	80	—	[101]
PMo₁₂-MnL/KB	0.5 M KHCO₃	-0.52 V vs. RHE	CO	65	—	[101]
MnL/KB	0.5 M KHCO₃	-0.72 V vs. RHE	CO	65	—	[101]
[Mn(L)(CO)₃Br (MnL)	CH₃CN	-1.7 V vs. Ag/Ag⁺	CO	85	34	[109]
AgNC@BSA	1 mM [Bu₄N]₄[α-SiW₁₂O₄₀] in DMF	-2.32 V vs. Fc^0/+	CO	75.6	—	[102]
Ag-PMo	DMF	-1.9 vs. Fc^0/+	CO	90 ± 5	—	[105]
Ag/N-doped graphene/carbon foam	0.1 M KHCO₃	-0.6 V vs. RHE	Ethanol	85.2	—	[110]
Ag QDDCs	0.5 M KHCO₃	-0.3 V vs. RHE	CO	95	—	[111]
Indium sheet	2 mM SiW₉V₃ + 0.1 M Na₂SO₄	-1.15 vs. Ag/AgCl	CH₃COOH	96.5	—	[103]
Indium sheet	2 mM SiW₁₁Mn+ 0.1 M Na₂SO₄	-1.0 V vs. RHE	CH₃COOH	72.1	—	[104]
In₂O₃-rGO	0.1 M KHCO₃	-1.2 V vs. RHE	HCOOH	84.6	—	[112]
Sulfur-doped indium	0.5 M KHCO₃	-0.98 V vs. RHE	HCOOH	93	—	[113]
Bi-PMo nanosheets	0.5 M KHCO₃	-0.86 V vs. RHE	CH₃COOH	93	—	[105]
Bi nano-dendrites	0.5 M KHCO₃	-0.96 V vs. RHE	CH₃COOH	81	—	[105]
Bi nanoﬂakes	0.1 M KHCO₃	-0.6 V vs. RHE	HCOOH	~100	—	[114]

Table 3 Performance of major POM-based electrocatalysts and other representative electrocatalysts used in electrocatalytic CO2RRs.

Electrocatalyst	Electrolyte	Potential	Principal product	FE (%)	TON	Ref.
(TOA)₆[α-SiW₁₁O₃₉Co(_)]	CH₂Cl₂	-1.5 V vs. Hg₂Cl₂/Hg	CO	18	—	[97]
(TBA)₃[H₂PW₁₁O₃₉{Rh^IIICp^*(OH₂)}]	CH₃CN	-1.8 V vs. Hg₂Cl₂/Hg	HCOOH	4.5	0.8	[98]
[Cp*Rh^III(bpy)Cl]⁺	CH₃CN	-1.8 V vs. Hg₂Cl₂/Hg	HCOOH	60	18	[98]
[Mn(III)TRP]⁵⁺/[SiW₁₂O₄₀]^4-/ITO	0.1 M NaClO₄	-0.8 V vs. Ag/AgCl	HCOOH	—	1.06 × 10⁴	[100]
[Zn(II)TRP]⁴⁺/[SiW₁₂O₄₀]^4-/ITO	0.1 M NaClO₄	-0.8 V vs. Ag/AgCl	Methanol	—	1.76 × 10⁵	[100]
[Ni(II)TRP]⁵⁺/[SiW₁₂O₄₀]^4-/ITO	0.1 M NaClO₄	-0.8 V vs. Ag/AgCl	CO	—	3.85 × 10³	[100]
[Ni(II)TRP]⁵⁺	DMF	-0.8 V vs. SHE	CO	—	—	[107]
Co-PMOF	0.5 M KHCO₃	-0.8 V vs. RHE	CO	98.7	7693	[37]
Fe-PMOF	0.5 M KHCO₃	-0.8 V vs. RHE	CO	28.8	—	[37]
Ni-PMOF	0.5 M KHCO₃	-0.8 V vs. RHE	CO	18.5	—	[37]
Zn-PMOF	0.5 M KHCO₃	-0.8 V vs. RHE	CO	0.95	—	[37]
Co-TMCP	0.5 M KHCO₃	-0.9 V vs. RHE	CO	~50	—	[37]
MOF-525(Co)	0.5 M KHCO₃	-0.8 V vs. RHE	CO	47.9	—	[37]
CoPPC/CNT	0.5 M KHCO₃	-0.58 V vs. RHE	CO	~90	—	[108]
SiW₁₂-MnL/KB	0.5 M KHCO₃	-0.72 V vs. RHE	CO	95	—	[101]
PW₁₂-MnL/KB	0.5 M KHCO₃	-0.72 V vs. RHE	CO	80	—	[101]
PMo₁₂-MnL/KB	0.5 M KHCO₃	-0.52 V vs. RHE	CO	65	—	[101]
MnL/KB	0.5 M KHCO₃	-0.72 V vs. RHE	CO	65	—	[101]
[Mn(L)(CO)₃Br (MnL)	CH₃CN	-1.7 V vs. Ag/Ag⁺	CO	85	34	[109]
AgNC@BSA	1 mM [Bu₄N]₄[α-SiW₁₂O₄₀] in DMF	-2.32 V vs. Fc^0/+	CO	75.6	—	[102]
Ag-PMo	DMF	-1.9 vs. Fc^0/+	CO	90 ± 5	—	[105]
Ag/N-doped graphene/carbon foam	0.1 M KHCO₃	-0.6 V vs. RHE	Ethanol	85.2	—	[110]
Ag QDDCs	0.5 M KHCO₃	-0.3 V vs. RHE	CO	95	—	[111]
Indium sheet	2 mM SiW₉V₃ + 0.1 M Na₂SO₄	-1.15 vs. Ag/AgCl	CH₃COOH	96.5	—	[103]
Indium sheet	2 mM SiW₁₁Mn+ 0.1 M Na₂SO₄	-1.0 V vs. RHE	CH₃COOH	72.1	—	[104]
In₂O₃-rGO	0.1 M KHCO₃	-1.2 V vs. RHE	HCOOH	84.6	—	[112]
Sulfur-doped indium	0.5 M KHCO₃	-0.98 V vs. RHE	HCOOH	93	—	[113]
Bi-PMo nanosheets	0.5 M KHCO₃	-0.86 V vs. RHE	CH₃COOH	93	—	[105]
Bi nano-dendrites	0.5 M KHCO₃	-0.96 V vs. RHE	CH₃COOH	81	—	[105]
Bi nanoﬂakes	0.1 M KHCO₃	-0.6 V vs. RHE	HCOOH	~100	—	[114]

Fig. 11. The DFT calculation and proposed reaction mechanism. (a) The free energy diagrams of CO2 reduction to CO for POM (orange), Co-TCPP (green), and Co-PMOF (pink). The rate-determining step and the corresponding free energy of each material are indicated (Note that an asterisk represents a surface-active site for reaction); (b) Comparison of the free energy of each elementary reaction (ΔG1, ΔG2, and ΔG3 represent the free energy of *COOH formation, *CO formation, and CO desorption, respectively) during CO2RRs for Co-PMOF, Fe-PMOF, Ni-PMOF, and Zn-PMOF, respectively; (c,d) Proposed mechanism scheme for the CO2RRs on Co-PMOF (POMs as electron-donors, porphyrins as charge transfer ligands, and TMs as electron-acceptors). Reprinted with the permission of Ref. [37]. Copyright 2018, Springer Nature.

Fig. 12. (a) Computed frontier orbitals (compositions and energies) for MnL, SiW12-MnL, PW12-MnL, and PMo12-MnL (the green lines represent the unoccupied molecular orbitals (MO) contributed by MnL in POM-MnL); (b) The electronic con?gurations for the di?erent reduction degree states of SiW12-MnL, PW12-MnL, and PMo12-MnL; (c) The transient photovoltage curves of powder POM-MnL and MnL; (d) Potential energy surfaces for H+ and CO2 addition to the respective active CO2 and H adducts. Reprinted with the permission of Ref. [101]. Copyright 2020, Royal Society of Chemistry (RSC).

参考文献

[1]	J. Fu, K. Jiang, X. Qiu, J. Yu, M. Liu, Mater. Today, 2020,32, 222-243.
[2]	Z. J. Wang, H. Song, H. Liu, J. Ye, Angew. Chem. Int. Ed., 2020,59, 8016-8035.
[3]	L. Liu, L. Zhou, B. Vaughn, J. B. Miller, W. A. Brand, M. Rothe, L. Xia, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 2014,119, 5602-5612.
[4]	D. Li, M. Kassymova, X. Cai, S.-Q. Zang, H.-L. Jiang, Coord. Chem. Rev., 2020,412, 213262-213277.
[5]	R. S. Nowak, S. F. Zitzer, D. Babcock, V. Smith-Longozo, T. N. Charlet, J. S. Coleman, J. R. Seemann, S. D. Smith, Ecology, 2004,85, 93-99.
[6]	L. Cao, K. Caldeira, Geophys. Res. Lett., 2008,35, L19609.
[7]	X. Duan, J. Xu, Z. Wei, J. Ma, S. Guo, S. Wang, H. Liu, S. Dou, Adv. Mater., 2017,29, 1701784.
[8]	Z. Sun, T. Ma, H. Tao, Q. Fan, B. Han, Chem, 2017,3, 560-587.
[9]	N. S. Spinner, J. A. Vega, W. E. Mustain, Catal. Sci. Technol., 2012,2, 19-28.
[10]	C. Song, Catal. Today, 2006,115, 2-32.
[11]	A. Mustafa, B. G. Lougou, Y. Shuai, Z. Wang, H. Tan, J. Energy Chem., 2020,49, 96-123.
[12]	M. C. J. Bradford, M. A. Vannice, E. Ruckenstein, Catal. Rev. Sci. Eng., 1999,41, 1-42.
[13]	T.-L. Chen, W. Jiang, A.-L. Shen, Y.-H. Chen, S.-Y. Pan, P.-C. Chiang, Ind. Eng. Chem. Res., 2020,59, 7140-7150.
[14]	A. M. Appel, J. E. Bercaw, A. B. Bocarsly, H. Dobbek, D. L. DuBois, M. Dupuis, J. G. Ferry, E. Fujita, R. Hille, P. J. Kenis, C. A. Kerfeld, R. H. Morris, C. H. Peden, A. R. Portis, S. W. Ragsdale, T. B. Rauchfuss, J. N. Reek, L. C. Seefeldt, R. K. Thauer, G. L. Waldrop, Chem. Rev., 2013,113, 6621-6658.
[15]	Y. Xia, Z. Tian, T. Heil, A. Meng, B. Cheng, S. Cao, J. Yu, M. Antonietti, Joule, 2019,3, 2792-2805.
[16]	A. J. Carrillo, A. H. Bork, T. Moser, E. Sediva, Z. D. Hood, J. L. M. Rupp, Adv. Energy Mater., 2019,9, 1803886.
[17]	J. Huang, M. Mensi, E. Oveisi, V. Mantella, R. Buonsanti, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2019,141, 2490-2499.
[18]	Z. Yin, G. T. R. Palmore, S. Sun, Trends Chem., 2019,1, 739-750.
[19]	N. Han, P. Ding, L. He, Y. Li, Y. Li, Adv. Energy Mater., 2019,10, 1902338.
[20]	D. Salvatore, C. P. Berlinguette, ACS Energy Lett., 2019,5, 215-220.
[21]	W. Zhang, C. Huang, Q. Xiao, L. Yu, L. Shuai, P. An, J. Zhang, M. Qiu, Z. Ren, Y. Yu, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2020,142, 11417-11427.
[22]	X. Zhao, L. Du, B. You, Y. Sun, Catal. Sci. Technol., 2020,10, 2711-2720.
[23]	S. Liang, N. Altaf, L. Huang, Y. Gao, Q. Wang, J. CO₂ Util., 2020,35, 90-105.
[24]	F.-Y. Gao, R.-C. Bao, M.-R. Gao, S.-H. Yu, 2020,8, 15458-15478.
[25]	J. Resasco, A. T. Bell, Trends Chem., 2020,2, 825-836.
[26]	O. G. Sánchez, Y. Y. Birdja, M. Bulut, J. Vaes, T. Breugelmans, D. Pant, Curr. Opin. Green Sust., 2019,16(s1), 47-56.
[27]	M. Bourrez, F. Molton, S. Chardon-Noblat, A. Deronzier, Angew. Chem. Int. Ed., 2011,50, 9903-9906.
[28]	A. Sinopoli, N. T. La Porte, J. F. Martinez, M. R. Wasielewski, M. Sohail, Coord. Chem. Rev., 2018,365, 60-74.
[29]	M. Stanbury, J.-D. Compain, S. Chardon-Noblat, Coord, Chem. Rev., 2018,361, 120-137.
[30]	J. Schneider, H. Jia, K. Kobiro, D. E. Cabelli, J. T. Muckerman, E. Fujita, Energy Environ. Sci., 2012,5, 9502-9510.
[31]	M. Isaacs, J. C. Canales, M. J. Aguirre, G. Estiú, F. Caruso, G. Ferraudi, J. Costamagna, Inorg. Chim. Acta, 2002,339, 224-232.
[32]	J. Costamagna, G. Ferraudi, J. Canales, J. Vargas, Coord. Chem. Rev., 1996,148, 221-248.
[33]	M. Rudolph, S. Dautz, E.-G. Jäger, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2000,122, 10821-10830.
[34]	H. Liu, J. Chu, Z. Yin, X. Cai, L. Zhuang, H. Deng, Chem, 2018,4, 1696-1709.
[35]	S. Lin, C. S. Diercks, Y. B. Zhang, N. Kornienko, E. M. Nichols, Y. Zhao, A. R. Paris, D. Kim, P. Yang, O. M. Yaghi, C. J. Chang, Science, 2015,349, 1208-1213.
[36]	P. L. Cheung, S. K. Lee, C. P. Kubiak, Chem. Mater., 2019,31, 1908-1919.
[37]	Y. R. Wang, Q. Huang, C. T. He, Y. Chen, J. Liu, F. C. Shen, Y. Q. Lan, Nat. Commun., 2018,9, 4466.
[38]	I. Hod, M. D. Sampson, P. Deria, C. P. Kubiak, O. K. Farha, J. T. Hupp, ACS Catal., 2015,5, 6302-6309.
[39]	F. N. Al-Rowaili, A. Jamal, M. S. Ba Shammakh, A. Rana, ACS Sustain. Chem. Eng., 2018,6, 15895-15914.
[40]	E. Zhang, T. Wang, K. Yu, J. Liu, W. Chen, A. Li, H. Rong, R. Lin, S. Ji, X. Zheng, Y. Wang, L. Zheng, C. Chen, D. Wang, J. Zhang, Y. Li, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2019,141, 16569-16573.
[41]	Y. N. Gong, L. Jiao, Y. Qian, C. Y. Pan, L. Zheng, X. Cai, B. Liu, S. H. Yu, H. L. Jiang, Angew. Chem. Int. Ed., 2020,59, 2705-2709.
[42]	X. Su, X. F. Yang, Y. Huang, B. Liu, T. Zhang, Acc Chem. Res., 2019,52, 656-664.
[43]	S. Sen, D. Liu, G. T. R. Palmore, ACS Catal., 2014,4, 3091-3095.
[44]	D. Gao, H. Zhou, F. Cai, J. Wang, G. Wang, X. Bao, ACS Catal., 2018,8, 1510-1519.
[45]	Y. Hori, K. Kikuchi, A. Murata, S. Suzuki, Chem. Lett., 1986, 897-898.
[46]	J. He, N. J. J. Johnson, A. Huang, C. P. Berlinguette, ChemSusChem, 2018,11, 48-57.
[47]	J. Shao, Y. Wang, D. Gao, K. Ye, Q. Wang, G. Wang, Chin. J. Catal., 2020,41, 1393-1400.
[48]	Y. Wang, L. Cao, N. J. Libretto, X. Li, C. Li, Y. Wan, C. He, J. Lee, J. Gregg, H. Zong, D. Su, J. T. Miller, T. Mueller, C. Wang, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2019,141, 16635-16642.
[49]	K. Zhao, Y. Liu, X. Quan, S. Chen, H. Yu, ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces, 2017,9, 5302-5311.
[50]	L. Liu, N. Tian, L. Huang, Y.-H. Hong, A.-Y. Xie, F.-Y. Zhang, C. Xiao, Z.-Y. Zhou, S.-G. Sun, Chin. J. Catal., 2016,37, 1070-1075.
[51]	J. Xu, X. Li, W. Liu, Y. Sun, Z. Ju, T. Yao, C. Wang, H. Ju, J. Zhu, S. Wei, Y. Xie, Angew. Chem. Int. Ed., 2017,56, 9121-9125.
[52]	S. Siahrostami, K. Jiang, M. Karamad, K. Chan, H. Wang, J. Nørskov, ACS Sustain. Chem. Eng., 2017,5, 11080-11085.
[53]	X. Liu, L. Dai, Nat. Rev. Mater., 2016,1, 16064.
[54]	I. V. Kozhevnikov, Chem. Rev., 1998,98, 171-198.
[55]	S. An, J.-C. Liu, H. Zhang, L. Wu, B. Qi, Y.-F. Song, Sci. China Chem., 2019,62, 159-161.
[56]	K. V. Avramidou, F. Zaccheria, S. A. Karakoulia, K. S. Triantafyllidis, N. Ravasio, Mol. Catal., 2017,439, 60-71.
[57]	J. T. Rhule, C. L. Hill, D. A. Judd, R. F. Schinazi, Chem. Rev., 1998,98, 327-358.
[58]	T. Yamase, Chem. Rev., 1998,98, 307-326.
[59]	L. Chen, W. L. Chen, X. L. Wang, Y. G. Li, Z. M. Su, E. B. Wang, Chem. Soc. Rev., 2019,48, 260-284.
[60]	J. Paul, P. Page, P. Sauers, K. Ertel, C. Pasternak, W. Lin, M. Kozik, in: T. Yamase, M. T. Pope, eds., Polyoxometalate Chemistry for Nano-Composite Design, Springer US, Boston, MA, 2002, 205-215.
[61]	W. H. Fang, L. Zhang, J. Zhang, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2016,138, 7480-7483.
[62]	Z. Huang, W. Luo, L. Ma, M. Yu, X. Ren, M. He, S. Polen, K. Click, B. Garrett, J. Lu, K. Amine, C. Hadad, W. Chen, A. Asthagiri, Y. Wu, Angew. Chem. Int. Ed., 2015,54, 15181-15185.
[63]	M. N. Sokolov, I. V. Kalinina, E. V. Peresypkina, E. Cadot, S. V. Tkachev, V. P. Fedin, Angew. Chem. Int. Ed., 2008,47, 1465-1468.
[64]	J. Kang, B. Xu, Z. Peng, X. Zhu, Y. Wei, D. R. Powell, Angew. Chem. Int. Ed., 2005,117, 7062-7065.
[65]	L. Vilà-Nadal, L. Cronin, Nat. Rev. Mater., 2017,2, 17054.
[66]	M. Sadakane, E. Steckhan, Chem. Rev., 1998,98, 219-238.
[67]	M.-Y. Wang, R. Ma, L.-N. He, Sci. China Chem., 2016,59, 507-516.
[68]	B. Yu, B. Zou, C.-W. Hu, J. CO₂ Util., 2018,26, 314-322.
[69]	Y. Cao, Q. Chen, C. Shen, L. He, Molecules, 2019,24, 2069.
[70]	Y. Zhang, J. Liu, S.-L. Li, Z.-M. Su, Y.-Q. Lan, Energy Chem, 2019,1, 100021.
[71]	J. Schneider, H. Jia, J.T. Muckerman, E. Fujita, Chem. Soc. Rev., 2012,41, 2036-2051.
[72]	Y. Hori, H. Wakebe, T. Tsukamoto, O. Koga, Electrochim. Acta, 1994,39, 183-1839.
[73]	R. Kortlever, J. Shen, K. J. Schouten, F. Calle-Vallejo, M. T. Koper, J. Phys. Chem. Lett., 2015,6, 4073-4082.
[74]	J.-P. Jones, G. K. S. Prakash, G. A. Olah, Israel J. Chem., 2014,54, 1451-1466.
[75]	H. A. Hansen, J. B. Varley, A. A. Peterson, J. K. Norskov, J. Phys. Chem. Lett., 2013,4, 388-392.
[76]	D. C. Lacy, C. C. L. McCrory, J. C. Peters, Inorg. Chem., 2014,53, 4980-4988.
[77]	X. Cui, J. Wang, B. Liu, S. Ling, R. Long, Y. Xiong, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2018,140, 16514-16520.
[78]	L. D. Chen, M. Urushihara, K. Chan, J. K. Nørskov, ACS Catal., 2016,6, 7133-7139.
[79]	M. L. Clark, A. Ge, P. E. Videla, B. Rudshteyn, C. J. Miller, J. Song, V. S. Batista, T. Lian, C. P. Kubiak, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2018,140, 17643-17655.
[80]	Y. Yang, L. Ohnoutek, S. Ajmal, X. Zheng, Y. Feng, K. Li, T. Wang, Y. Deng, Y. Liu, D. Xu, V. K. Valev, L. Zhang, J. Mater. Chem. A, 2019,7, 11836-11846.
[81]	Y. Wang, P. Han, X. Lv, L. Zhang, G. Zheng, Joule, 2018,2, 2551-2582.
[82]	D. Kim, J. Resasco, Y. Yu, A. M. Asiri, P. Yang, Nat. Commun., 2014,5, 4948.
[83]	A. Eilert, F. Cavalca, F. S. Roberts, J. Osterwalder, C. Liu, M. Favaro, E. J. Crumlin, H. Ogasawara, D. Friebel, L. G. Pettersson, A. Nilsson, J. Phys. Chem. Lett., 2017,8, 285-290.
[84]	K. Chan, C. Tsai, H. A. Hansen, J. K. Nørskov, ChemCatChem, 2014,6, 1899-1905.
[85]	A. S. Varela, M. Kroschel, T. Reier, P. Strasser, Catal. Today, 2016,260, 8-13.
[86]	D. M. Weekes, D. A. Salvatore, A. Reyes, A. Huang, C. P. Berlinguette, Acc. Chem. Res., 2018,51, 910-918.
[87]	D. Gao, H. Zhou, F. Cai, D. Wang, Y. Hu, B. Jiang, W.-B. Cai, X. Chen, R. Si, F. Yang, S. Miao, J. Wang, G. Wang, X. Bao, Nano Res., 2017,10, 2181-2191.
[88]	S. H. Szczepankiewicz, C. M. Ippolito, B. P. Santora, T. J. Van De Ven, G. A. Ippolito, L. Fronckowiak, F. Wiatrowski, T. Power, M. Kozik, Inorg. Chem., 1998,37, 4344-4352.
[89]	G. Gao, F. Li, L. Xu, X. Liu, Y. Yang, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2008,130, 10838-10839.
[90]	D. L. Long, R. Tsunashima, L. Cronin, Angew. Chem. Int. Ed., 2010,49, 1736-1758.
[91]	K. Watenpaugh, C. N. Caughlan, Chem. Comm., 1967, 76-77.
[92]	Y. Lv, J. Cheng, A. Steiner, L. Gan, D. S. Wright, Angew. Chem. Int. Ed., 2014,53, 1934-1938.
[93]	P. Yang, U. Kortz, Acc. Chem. Res., 2018,51, 1599-1608.
[94]	N. I. Gumerova, A. Rompel, Nat. Rev. Chem., 2018,2, 0112.
[95]	L. MacDonald, J. C. McGlynn, N. Irvine, I. Alshibane, L. G. Bloor, B. Rausch, J. S. J. Hargreaves, L. Cronin, Sustain. Energy Fuels, 2017,1, 1782-1787.
[96]	B. Rausch, M. D. Symes, G. Chisholm, L. Cronin, Science, 2014,345, 1326-1330.
[97]	M. Girardi, S. Blanchard, S. Griveau, P. Simon, M. Fontecave, F. Bedioui, A. Proust, Eur. J. Inorg. Chem., 2015,2015, 3642-3648.
[98]	M. Girardi, D. Platzer, S. Griveau, F. Bedioui, S. Alves, A. Proust, S. Blanchard, Eur. J. Inorg. Chem., 2019,2019, 387-393.
[99]	J.-X. Liu, X.-B. Zhang, Y.-L. Li, S.-L. Huang, G.-Y. Yang, Coord. Chem. Rev., 2020,414, 213260.
[100]	M. García, M. J. Aguirre, G. Canzi, C. P. Kubiak, M. Ohlbaum, M. Isaacs, Electrochim. Acta, 2014,115, 146-154.
[101]	J. Du, Z.-L. Lang, Y.-Y. Ma, H.-Q. Tan, B.-L. Liu, Y.-H. Wang, Z.-H. Kang, Y.-G. Li, Chem. Sci., 2020,11, 3007-3015.
[102]	S. X. Guo, D. R. MacFarlane, J. Zhang, ChemSusChem, 2016,9, 80-87.
[103]	B. Zha, C. Li, J. Li, J. Catal., 2020,382, 69-76.
[104]	C. Li, B. Zha, J. Li, J. CO₂ Util., 2020,38, 299-305.
[105]	S. X. Guo, F. Li, L. Chen, D. R. MacFarlane, J. Zhang, ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces, 2018,10, 12690-12697.
[106]	S. X. Guo, Y. Zhang, X. Zhang, C. D. Easton, D. R. MacFarlane, J. Zhang, ChemSusChem, 2019,12, 1091-1100.
[107]	H. E. Toma, K. Araki, Coord. Chem. Rev., 2000,196, 307-329.
[108]	N. Han, Y. Wang, L. Ma, J. Wen, J. Li, H. Zheng, K. Nie, X. Wang, F. Zhao, Y. Li, J. Fan, J. Zhong, T. Wu, D. J. Miller, J. Lu, S.-T. Lee, Y. Li, Chem, 2017,3, 652-664.
[109]	M. Bourrez, F. Molton, S. Chardon-Noblat, A. Deronzier, Angew. Chem. Int. Ed., 2011,50, 9903-9906.
[110]	K. Lv, Y. Fan, Y. Zhu, Y. Yuan, J. Wang, Y. Zhu, Q. Zhang, J. Mater. Chem. A, 2018,6, 5025-5031.
[111]	M. Liu, M. Liu, X. Wang, S. M. Kozlov, Z. Cao, P. De Luna, H. Li, X. Qiu, K. Liu, J. Hu, C. Jia, P. Wang, H. Zhou, J. He, M. Zhong, X. Lan, Y. Zhou, Z. Wang, J. Li, A. Seifitokaldani, C. T. Dinh, H. Liang, C. Zou, D. Zhang, Y. Yang, T.-S. Chan, Y. Han, L. Cavallo, T.-K. Sham, B.-J. Hwang, E. H. Sargent, Joule, 2019,3, 1703-1718.
[112]	Z. Zhang, F. Ahmad, W. Zhao, W. Yan, W. Zhang, H. Huang, C. Ma, J. Zeng, Nano Lett., 2019,19, 4029-4034.
[113]	W. Ma, S. Xie, X.-G. Zhang, F. Sun, J. Kang, Z. Jiang, Q. Zhang, D.-Y. Wu, Y. Wang, Nat. Commun., 2019,10, 892.
[114]	S. Kim, W. J. Dong, S. Gim, W. Sohn, J. Y. Park, C. J. Yoo, H. W. Jang, J.-L. Lee, Nano Energy, 2017,39, 44-52.
[115]	D. Wang, L. L. Liu, J. Jiang, L. J. Chen, J. W. Zhao, Nanoscale, 2020,12, 5705-5718.
[116]	N. Li, J. Liu, B.-X. Dong, Y.-Q. Lan, Angew. Chem. Int. Ed., 2020, doi: 10.1002/anie.202008054
[117]	A. S. Cherevan, S. P. Nandan, I. Roger, R. Liu, C. Streb, D. Eder, Adv. Sci., 2020,7, 1903511.
[118]	X.-B. Han, D.-X. Wang, E. Gracia-Espino, Y.-H. Luo, Y.-Z. Tan, D.-F. Lu, Y.-G. Li, T. Wågberg, E.-B. Wang, L.-S. Zheng, Chin. J. Catal., 2020,41, 853-857.
[119]	D. X. Liu, B. Wang, H. G. Li, S. F. Huang, M. M. Liu, J. Wang, Q. J. Wang, J. J. Zhang, Y. F. Zhao, Nano Energy, 2019,58, 277-283.
[120]	J. Zhang, Q. A. Huang, J. Wang, J. Wang, J. J. Zhang, Y. F. Zhao, Chin. J. Catal., 2020,41, 783-798.

多金属氧酸盐材料在二氧化碳电催化还原领域中的研究进展

Progress of electrochemical CO₂ reduction reactions over polyoxometalate-based materials

RichHTML

PDF

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

扫码分享

图/表 17

参考文献

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

[1]	唐小龙, 李锋, 李方, 江燕斌, 余长林. 单原子催化剂在光催化和电催化合成过氧化氢中的研究进展[J]. 催化学报, 2023, 52(9): 79-98.
[2]	张季, 俞爱民, 孙成华. 非金属掺杂石墨烯异核双原子催化剂氮还原特性研究[J]. 催化学报, 2023, 52(9): 263-270.
[3]	胡金念, 田玲婵, 王海燕, 孟洋, 梁锦霞, 朱纯, 李隽. MXene负载3d金属单原子高效氮还原电催化剂的理论筛选[J]. 催化学报, 2023, 52(9): 252-262.
[4]	洪岩, 王琦, 阚子旺, 张禹烁, 郭晶, 李思琦, 刘松, 李斌. 电化学氮还原氨反应催化剂的最新研究进展[J]. 催化学报, 2023, 52(9): 50-78.
[5]	刘勇, 赵晓丽, 隆昶, 王晓艳, 邓邦为, 李康璐, 孙艳娟, 董帆. 原位构筑动态Cu/Ce(OH)_x界面用于高活性、高选择性和高稳定性硝酸盐还原合成氨[J]. 催化学报, 2023, 52(9): 196-206.
[6]	高晖, 张恭, 程东方, 王永涛, 赵静, 李晓芝, 杜晓伟, 赵志坚, 王拓, 张鹏, 巩金龙. 构建Cu台阶位促进电催化CO₂还原制醇类化学品的研究[J]. 催化学报, 2023, 52(9): 187-195.
[7]	孙丽娟, 于晓慧, 唐丽永, 王伟康, 刘芹芹. 构建K₃PW₁₂O₄₀/CdS核壳S型异质结实现同步太阳能光催化分解水和选择性苯甲醇氧化反应[J]. 催化学报, 2023, 52(9): 164-175.
[8]	张雯, 宋彩彩, 王嘉蔚, 蔡舒婷, 高梦语, 冯有祥, 鲁统部. 双向主客体作用促进水溶液中选择性光催化CO₂还原与醇氧化[J]. 催化学报, 2023, 52(9): 176-186.
[9]	邹心仪, 顾均. 酸性条件下二氧化碳高效电还原策略[J]. 催化学报, 2023, 52(9): 14-31.
[10]	邵秀丽, 李可, 李静萍, 程强, 王国宏, 王楷. 揭示NiS@Ta₂O₅纳米纤维中梯型电荷转移路径及光催化CO₂转化性能[J]. 催化学报, 2023, 51(8): 193-203.
[11]	周波, 石建巧, 姜一民, 肖磊, 逯宇轩, 董帆, 陈晨, 王特华, 王双印, 邹雨芹. 强化脱氢动力学实现超低电池电压和大电流密度下抗坏血酸电氧化[J]. 催化学报, 2023, 50(7): 372-380.
[12]	李慧杰, 池漫洲, 辛兴, 王瑞杰, 刘天府, 吕红金, 杨国昱. 异金属取代的多金属氧酸盐@光响应型金属-有机框架用于高选择性光催化CO₂还原[J]. 催化学报, 2023, 50(7): 343-351.
[13]	王元男, 王立娜, 张可新, 徐靖尧, 武倩楠, 谢周兵, 安伟, 梁宵, 邹晓新. 钙钛矿氧化物在水裂解反应中的电催化研究[J]. 催化学报, 2023, 50(7): 109-125.
[14]	周纳, 王家志, 张宁, 王志, 王恒国, 黄岗, 鲍迪, 钟海霞, 张新波. 富含缺陷的Cu@CuTCNQ复合材料增强电催化硝酸盐还原成氨[J]. 催化学报, 2023, 50(7): 324-333.
[15]	李轩, 蒋兴星, 孔艳, 孙建桔, 胡琪, 柴晓燕, 杨恒攀, 何传新. GaN/In₂O₃的界面工程用于高效电催化CO₂还原制备甲酸[J]. 催化学报, 2023, 50(7): 314-323.

多金属氧酸盐材料在二氧化碳电催化还原领域中的研究进展

Progress of electrochemical CO2 reduction reactions over polyoxometalate-based materials

RichHTML

PDF

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

扫码分享

图/表 17

参考文献

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

Progress of electrochemical CO₂ reduction reactions over polyoxometalate-based materials