镍铁层状双金属氢氧化物在不同pH电解液体系中的析氧反应

doi:10.1016/S1872-2067(22)64190-1

催化学报 ›› 2023, Vol. 44: 127-138.DOI: 10.1016/S1872-2067(22)64190-1

镍铁层状双金属氢氧化物在不同pH电解液体系中的析氧反应

谢起贤^a, 任丹^b, 柏力晨^c, 格日乐^d, 周雯慧^d, 白璐^e, 谢微^e, 王军虎^d^,^*(), Michael Grätzel^b, 罗景山^a^,^*()

^a南开大学光电子薄膜器件与技术研究所, 天津市光电子薄膜器件与技术重点实验室, 教育部薄膜光电子技术工程研究中心, 新能源转化与存储交叉科学中心, 天津 300350, 中国
^b瑞士洛桑联邦理工学院化学科学与工程研究所, 光子学与界面实验室, 洛桑, 瑞士
^c瑞士洛桑联邦理工学院化学科学与工程研究所, 无机合成与催化实验室, 洛桑, 瑞士
^d中国科学院大连化学物理研究所, 穆斯堡尔谱研究组, 辽宁大连 116023, 中国
^e南开大学化学学院, 先进能源材料化学教育部重点实验室, 天津 300071, 中国

收稿日期:2022-06-13 接受日期:2022-08-04 出版日期:2023-01-18 发布日期:2022-12-08
通讯作者: 王军虎,罗景山
基金资助:
国家重点研发计划(2019YFE0123400);国家重点研发计划(2018YFB1502003);国家自然科学基金优秀青年基金(22122903);天津市杰出青年基金(20JCJQJC00260);“111”项目(B16027);中国国家留学基金委奖学金;“太阳能生物燃料”微生物计划(GRS-080/19);瑞士国家科学基金会早期博士后研究奖学金(P2ELP2_199800);国家自然科学基金中日合作重点项目(21961142006);中国科学院国际合作伙伴计划(121421KYSB20170020)

Investigation of nickel iron layered double hydroxide for water oxidation in different pH electrolytes

Qixian Xie^a, Dan Ren^b, Lichen Bai^c, Rile Ge^d, Wenhui Zhou^d, Lu Bai^e, Wei Xie^e, Junhu Wang^d^,^*(), Michael Grätzel^b, Jingshan Luo^a^,^*()

^aInstitute of Photoelectronic Thin Film Devices and Technology, Key Laboratory of Photoelectronic Thin Film Devices and Technology of Tianjin, Ministry of Education Engineering Research Center of Thin Film Photoelectronic Technology, Renewable Energy Conversion and Storage Center, Nankai University, Tianjin 300350, China
^bLaboratory of Photonics and Interfaces, Institute of Chemical Sciences and Engineering, École Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne (EPFL), 1015 Lausanne, Switzerland
^cLaboratory of Inorganic Synthesis and Catalysis, Institute of Chemical Sciences and Engineering, Ecole Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne (EPFL), 1015 Lausanne, Switzerland
^dCenter for Advanced Mössbauer Spectroscopy, Mössbauer Effect Data Center, Dalian Institute of Chemical Physics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Dalian 116023, Liaoning, China
^eKey Laboratory of Advanced Energy Materials Chemistry (Ministry of Education), College of Chemistry, Nankai University, Tianjin 300071, China

Received:2022-06-13 Accepted:2022-08-04 Online:2023-01-18 Published:2022-12-08
Contact: Junhu Wang, Jingshan Luo
Supported by:
National Key Research and Development Program of China(2019YFE0123400);National Key Research and Development Program of China(2018YFB1502003);Excellent Young Scholar Fund from the National Science Foundation of China(22122903);Tianjin Distinguished Young Scholar Fund(20JCJQJC00260);“111” Project(B16027);scholarship from the China Scholarship Council;Gebert Rüf Stiftung under Microbials scheme ‘Solar-Bio Fuels’(GRS-080/19);Early Postdoc Research Fellowship from the Swiss National Science Foundation(P2ELP2_199800);National Science Foundation of China(21961142006);International Partnership Program of Chinese Academy of Sciences(121421KYSB20170020)

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

利用可再生电力驱动水分解提供了一种绿色和可持续的方式来生产氢气(H₂), 而提高水分解效率的关键是开发高效的电催化剂. 作为水分解反应的阴极, 析氢反应(HER)仅需要两电子转移, 目前的研究较为成熟. 相比之下, 析氧反应(OER)因涉及四个电子的转移, 比HER过程更复杂. 在众多析氧催化剂中, 镍铁(NiFe)基电催化剂是碱性电解液体系中最佳的OER催化剂之一, 然而其在中性及近中性体系中活性降低较多, 从而限制了其在中性的海水电解及二氧化碳还原体系中的应用. 目前, 造成NiFe基催化剂在中性体系中性能较差的具体机制尚不清晰. 文献报道, 随着体系pH逐渐降低, NiFe基催化剂析氧性能也会随之变差; 深入研究发现, 碱性体系中更易于形成高价的Ni, Fe物质, 但其是否对催化剂在水分解过程中有影响仍有待进一步研究.

本文将电化学测试与原位光谱技术相结合, 对镍铁层状双金属氢氧化物(NiFe LDH)在不同pH电解液体系中的析氧反应机理进行深入研究. 电化学测试结果表明, 随着pH值逐渐降低, NiFe LDH催化剂的析氧性能逐渐变差. 原位表面增强拉曼光谱结果表明, 不同pH电解液体系中NiOOH和“活性氧”物质的形成与施加的阳极电位有关, 高价Ni物质在高pH电解液中更容易形成, 而在中性及近中性体系中则需要较高的电位才可以形成. 引入原位⁵⁷Fe穆斯堡尔谱以观察稳定阳极电位条件下Fe氧化态的变化, 测试结果表明, 高价的Fe⁴⁺物质在碱性条件容易形成, 而对于中性及近中性体系中, 在高施加电位下仍旧难以形成Fe⁴⁺物质. 为探究高价态Ni, Fe是否影响NiFe基催化剂的析氧性能, 利用电化学活化方法构筑了具有Ni³⁺和Fe⁴⁺物质的NiFe CVA₅₀₀ (500圈CV循环)催化剂, 保证其在不同的pH电解液体系中保持相同的初始反应状态. 在对应pH体系中, 电化学活化的NiFe CVA₅₀₀催化剂相较于原始的NiFe LDH性能有所提升, 但在中性体系中的OER性能仍然低于碱性体系中的性能. 基于电化学及原位光谱测量结果表明, Ni³⁺和Fe⁴⁺物质的形成并不是影响不同pH条件下OER性能的决定性因素. OER电化学性能、动力学研究和甲醇氧化实验结果发现, NiFe LDH在不同pH体系中的析氧反应决速步是不同的, 在碱性电解液体系中, 其决速步是从*O到*OOH, 而中性体系中*OH的形成为决速步. 综上, 本文为阐明NiFe基催化剂在不同pH电解液体系中的OER反应机制提供了新的见解.

关键词: 镍铁层状双金属氢氧化物, 析氧反应, 原位表面增强拉曼光谱, 原位⁵⁷Fe穆斯堡尔光谱

Abstract:

Nickel iron layered double hydroxide (NiFe LDH) is one of the best oxygen evolution reaction (OER) catalysts in alkaline electrolytes. However, it performs poorly in neutral electrolytes, and the detailed mechanism is still unclear. Herein, we introduce electrochemical measurements, operando surface enhanced Raman spectroscopy and operando ⁵⁷Fe Mössbauer spectroscopy to elucidate the mechanism of NiFe LDH for OER process in different pH electrolytes. Our results show that even though there exist Ni³⁺ and Fe⁴⁺ species, the NiFe LDH based electrocatalysts still show worse OER performance in neutral electrolytes than in alkaline conditions. Combining the electrochemical measurements with spectroscopic investigations, we demonstrated that the rate-determining step (RDS) of OER on NiFe LDH based electrocatalysts is from *O to *OOH in alkaline medium while *OH formation is the RDS in neutral conditions. Our work provides new insights into elucidating the OER mechanism in different pH electrolytes.

Key words: Nickel Iron layered double hydroxide, Oxygen evolution reaction, Operando surface enhanced Raman spectroscopy, Operando ⁵⁷Fe M?ssbauer spectroscopy

谢起贤, 任丹, 柏力晨, 格日乐, 周雯慧, 白璐, 谢微, 王军虎, Michael Grätzel, 罗景山. 镍铁层状双金属氢氧化物在不同pH电解液体系中的析氧反应[J]. 催化学报, 2023, 44: 127-138.

Qixian Xie, Dan Ren, Lichen Bai, Rile Ge, Wenhui Zhou, Lu Bai, Wei Xie, Junhu Wang, Michael Grätzel, Jingshan Luo. Investigation of nickel iron layered double hydroxide for water oxidation in different pH electrolytes[J]. Chinese Journal of Catalysis, 2023, 44: 127-138.

×
扫码分享

导出引用管理器 EndNote|Ris|BibTeX

链接本文: https://www.cjcatal.com/CN/10.1016/S1872-2067(22)64190-1

https://www.cjcatal.com/CN/Y2023/V44/I1/127

图/表 5

Fig. 1. Electrochemical OER performance and operado spectroscopic measurements of the pristine NiFe LDH. Cyclic voltammetry curves (a) and Tafel slopes (b) of NiFe LDH tested in the different electrolytes (0.1 mol L?1 KOH, pH = 13; 0.1 mol L?1 BBS, pH = 9.2; 0.1 mol L?1 PBS, pH = 7, the scan rate is 10 mV s?1). The operando SERS of NiFe LDH acquired in the potential range from 1.0?1.7 V vs. RHE in 0.1 mol L?1 KOH (c), 0.1 mol L?1 BBS (d), 0.1 mol L?1 PBS (e) (potential step size is 100 mV); the operando 57Fe Mo?ssbauer spectra of NiFe LDH collected at different pH electrolytes: (f) 1.57 V vs. RHE, 0.1 mol L?1 KOH, pH = 13. (g) 2.17 V vs. RHE, 0.1 mol L?1 BBS, pH 9.2; (h) 2.17 V vs. RHE, 0.1 mol L?1 PBS, pH = 7.

Fig. 2. Spectroscopic characterizations of NiFe CVA500 sample. XPS spectra results of Ni 2p (a), Fe 2p (b), ex-situ Raman spectra (c), and ex-situ 57Fe Mo?ssbauer spectrum (d) of NiFe CVA500.

Fig. 3. Electrochemical OER performance and in-situ/operando spectroscopy measurements of the NiFe CVA500. (a) CV curves of NiFe CVA500 in the different pH electrolytes. (b) Tafel slopes of the NiFe CVA500 samples in the different pH electrolytes; operando Raman spectra of pristine NiFe CVA500 acquired in the potential range 1.0?1.7 V vs. RHE in 0.1 mol L?1 KOH (c), 0.1 mol L?1 BBS (d), and 0.1 mol L?1 PBS (e). The measurements were performed potentiostatically. Operando Mo?ssbauer spectra of NiFe CVA500 collected at high potential in different pH electrolytes: (f) 0.1 mol L?1 PBS, pH = 7.0 (2.17V vs. RHE). (g) 0.1 mol L?1 BBS, pH = 9.2 (2.17 V vs. RHE). (h) 0.1 mol L?1 KOH, pH = 13 (1.77 V vs. RHE).

Fig. 4. Electrochemical response to methanol of pristine NiFe LDH in different electrolytes (0.5 mol L?1 KOH/BBS/PBS with and without 0.5 mol L?1 methanol). CV curves for NiFe LDH in different electrolytes: (a) 0.5 mol L?1 KOH; (c) 0.5 mol L?1 BBS; (e) 0.5 mol L?1 PBS. Schematic energy profile for the NiFe based electrocatalysts for OER process in different pH conditions: (b) the alkaline condition; (d) the near neutral condition; (f) the neutral condition. The inset Figure shows enlarged CV curves at the low current region, and the scan rate is 50 mV s?1 (the solid line is with 0.5 mol L?1 methanol, and the dashed line is without methanol).

Fig. 5. Proposed mechanism of NiFe LDH electrocatalyst for OER in different pH electrolytes.

参考文献

[1]	C. Roy, B. Sebok, S. B. Scott, E. M. Fiordaliso, J. E. Sørensen, A. Bodin, D. B. Trimarco, C. D. Damsgaard, P. C. K. Vesborg, O. Hansen, I. E. L. Stephens, J. Kibsgaard, I. Chorkendorff, Nat. Catal., 2018, 1, 820-829.
[2]	W. Zhang, Y. Wu, J. Qi, M. Chen, R. Cao, Adv. Energy Mater., 2017, 7, 1602547.
[3]	K. Zhu, X. Zhu, W. Yang, Angew. Chem. Int. Ed., 2019, 58, 1252-1265.
[4]	X. Zhang, H. Xu, X. Li, Y. Li, T. Yang, Y. Liang, ACS Catal., 2016, 6, 580-588.
[5]	H. Li, C. Tsai, A. L. Koh, L. Cai, A. W. Contryman, A. H. Fragapane, J. Zhao, H. S. Han, H. C. Manoharan, F. Abild-Pedersen, J. K. Nørskov, X. Zheng, Nat. Mater., 2016, 15, 48-53.
[6]	H. S. Park, J. Yang, M. K. Cho, Y. Lee, S. Cho, S. D. Yim, B. S. Kim, J. H. Jang, H. K. Song, Nano Energy, 2019, 55, 49-58.
[7]	J. Qi, W. Zhang, R. Xiang, K. Liu, H.-Y. Wang, M. Chen, Y. Han, R. Cao, Adv. Sci., 2015, 2, 1500199.
[8]	X. Lu, C. Zhao, Nat. Commun., 2015, 6, 6616.
[9]	P. Zhang, L. Li, D. Nordlund, H. Chen, L. Fan, B. Zhang, X. Sheng, Q. Daniel, L. Sun, Nat. Commun., 2018, 9, 381.
[10]	J. Xie, H. Qu, F. Lei, X. Peng, W. Liu, L. Gao, P. Hao, G. Cui, B. Tang, J. Mater. Chem. A, 2018, 6, 16121-16129.
[11]	R. Chen, S.-F. Hung, D. Zhou, J. Gao, C. Yang, H. Tao, H. B. Yang, L. Zhang, L. Zhang, Q. Xiong, H. M. Chen, B. Liu, Adv. Mater., 2019, 31, 1903909.
[12]	X. Zhang, Y. Zhao, Y. Zhao, R. Shi, G. I. N. Waterhouse, T. Zhang, Adv. Energy Mater., 2019, 9, 1900881.
[13]	C. Liang, P. Zou, A. Nairan, Y. Zhang, J. Liu, K. Liu, S. Hu, F. Kang, H. J. Fan, C. Yang, Energy Environ. Sci., 2020, 13, 86-95.
[14]	C. Andronescu, S. Barwe, E. Ventosa, J. Masa, E. Vasile, B. Konkena, S. Möller, W. Schuhmann, Angew. Chem. Int. Ed., 2017, 56, 11258-11262.
[15]	M. Gong, H. Dai, Nano Res., 2015, 8, 23-39.
[16]	S. Anantharaj, K. Karthick, M. Venkatesh, T,. V. S. V. Simha, A. S. Salunke, L. Ma, H. Liang, S. Kundu, Nano Energy, 2017, 39, 30-43.
[17]	L. Trotochaud, S. L. Young, J. K. Ranney, S. W. Boettche, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2014, 136, 6744-6753.
[18]	X. Xu, F. Song, X. Hu, Nat. Commun., 2016, 7, 12324.
[19]	N. Han, F. Zhao, Y. Li, J. Mater. Chem. A, 2015, 3, 16348-16353.
[20]	J. Luo, D. A. Vermaas, D. Bi, A. Hagfeldt, W. A. Smith, M. Grätzel, Adv. Energy Mater., 2016, 6, 1600100.
[21]	J. Luo, J.-H. Im, M. T. Mayer, M. Schreier, M. K. Nazeeruddin, N.-G. Park, S. D. Tilley, H. J. Fan, M. Grätzel, Science, 2014, 345, 1593-1596.
[22]	F. Dionigi, P. Strasser. Adv. Energy Mater., 2016, 6, 1600621.
[23]	M. Görlin, J. Ferreira de Araújo, H. Schmies, D. Bernsmeier, S. Dresp, M. Gliech, Z. Jusys, P. Chernev, R. Kraehnert, H. Dau, P. Strasser, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2017, 139, 2070-2082.
[24]	A. M. Smith, L. Trotochaud, M. S. Burke, S. W. Boettcher, Chem. Commun., 2015, 51, 5261-5263.
[25]	B. Zhang, Y. H. Lui, H. Ni, S. Hu, Nano Energy, 2017, 38, 553-560.
[26]	S. Dresp, F. Dionigi, M. Klingenhof, P. Strasser, ACS Energy Lett., 2019, 4, 933-942.
[27]	J. Li, Y. Kuang, Y. Meng, X. Tian, W.-H. Hung, X. Zhang, A. Li, M. Xu, W. Zhou, C.-S. Ku, C.-Y. Chiang, G. Zhu, J. Guo, X. Sun, H. Dai, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2020, 142, 7276-7282.
[28]	M. Görlin, M. Gliech, J. F. de Araújo, S. Dresp, A. Bergmann, P. Strasser, Catal. Today, 2016, 262, 65-73.
[29]	B. J. Trześniewski, O. Diaz-Morales, D. A. Vermaas, A. Longo, W. Bras, M. T. M. Koper, W. A. Smith, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2015, 137, 15112-15121.
[30]	X. P. Zhang, A. Chandra, Y. M. Lee, R. Cao, K. Ray, W. Nam, Chem. Soc. Rev., 2021, 50, 4804-4811.
[31]	J. H. Shah, Q. X. Xie, Z. C. Kuang, R. L. Ge, W. H. Zhou, D. R. Liu, A. I. Rykov, X. N. Li, J. S. Luo, J. H. Wang, J. H. Wang, J. Electrochem., 2022, 28, 2108541.
[32]	D. A. Corrigan, R. S. Conell, C. A. Fierro, D. A. Scherson, J. Phys. Chem., 1987, 91, 5009-5011.
[33]	Y. C. Chen, L. Dang, H. Liang, W. Bi, J. B. Gerken, S. Jin, E. E. Alp, S. S. Stahl, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2015, 137, 15090-15093.
[34]	Z. Kuang, S. Liu, X. Li, M. Wang, X. Ren, J. Ding, R. Ge, W. Zhou, A. I. Rykov, M. T. Sougrati, P. E. Lippens, Y. Huang, J. Wang, J Energy Chem., 2021, 57, 212-218.
[35]	L. Yang, L. Xie, R. Ge, R. Kong, Z. Liu, G. Du, A. M. Asiri, Y. Yao, Y. Luo, ACS Appl. Mater. Inter., 2017, 9, 19502-19506.
[36]	B. Zhang, Y. H. Lui, L. Zhou, X. Tang, S. Hu, J. Mater. Chem. A, 2017, 5, 13329-13335.
[37]	Y. Dong, S. Komarneni, F. Zhang, N. Wang, M. Terrones, W. Hu, W. Huang, Appl. Catal. B, 2019, 263, 118343.
[38]	X. Zheng, B. Zhang, P. De Luna, Y. Liang, R. Comin, O. Voznyy, L. Han, F. P. García de Arquer, M. Liu, C. T. Dinh, T. Regier, J. J. Dynes, S. He, H. L. Xin, H. Peng, D. Prendergast, X. Du, E. H. Sargent, Nat. Chem., 2018, 10, 149-154.
[39]	J. Zhang, J. Liu, L. Xi, Y. Yu, N. Chen, S. Sun, W. Wang, K. M. Lange, B. Zhang, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2018, 140, 3876-3879.
[40]	I. C. Man, H. Y. Su, F. Calle-Vallejo, H. A. Hansen, J. I. Martínez, N. G. Inoglu, J. Kitchin, T. F. Jaramillo, J. K. Nørskov, J. Rossmeisl, ChemCatChem, 2011, 3, 1159-1165.
[41]	L. Demourgues-Guerlou, L. Fournès, C. Delmas, J Solid State Chem., 1995, 114, 6-14.
[42]	D. Friebel, M. W. Louie, M. Bajdich, K. E. Sanwald, Y. Cai, A. M. Wise, M.-J. Cheng, D. Sokaras, T.-C. Weng, R. Alonso-Mori, R. C. Davis, J. R. Bargar, J. K. Nørskov, A. Nilsson, A. T. Bell, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2015, 137, 1305-1313.
[43]	S. Anantharaj, S. Noda, M. Driess, P. W. Menezes, ACS Energy Lett., 2021, 6, 1607-1611.
[44]	H. Zhang, X. Li, A. Hähnel, V. Naumann, C. Lin, S. Azimi, S. L. Schweizer, A. W. Maijenburg, R. B. Wehrspohn, Adv. Funct. Mater., 2018, 28, 1706847.
[45]	D. Zhou, S. Wang, Y. Jia, X. Xiong, H. Yang, S. Liu, J. Tang, J. Zhang, D. Liu, L. Zheng, Y. Kuang, X. Sun, B. Liu, Angew. Chem. Int. Ed., 2019, 131, 746-750.
[46]	M. Merrill, M. Worsley, A. Wittstock, J. Biener, M. Stadermann, J. Electroanal. Chem., 2014, 717, 177-188.
[47]	S. Lee, L. Bai, X. Hu, Angew. Chem. Int. Ed., 2020, 59, 8072-8077.
[48]	E. Sediva, T. Defferriere, N. H. Perry, H. L. Tuller, J. L. M. Rupp, Adv. Mater., 2019, 31, 1902493.
[49]	B. M. Hunter, W. Hieringer, J. R. Winkler, H. B. Gray, A. M. Müller, Energy Environ. Sci., 2016, 9, 1734-1743.
[50]	D. Zhou, Z. Cai, Y. Bi, W. Tian, M. Luo, Q. Zhang, Q. Zhang, Q. Xie, J. Wang, Y. Li, Y. Kuang, X. Duan, M. Bajdich, S. Siahrostami, X. Sun, Nano Res., 2018, 11, 1358-1368.
[51]	Z. Qiu, C. W. Tai, G. A. Niklasson, T. Edvinsson, Energy Environ. Sci., 2019, 12, 572-581.
[52]	M. W. Louie, A. T. Bell, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2013, 135, 12329-12337.
[53]	B. P. Payne, M. C. Biesinger, N. S. McIntyre, J. Electron. Spectrosc., 2012, 185, 159-166.
[54]	Q. Zhou, Y. Chen, G. Zhao, Y. Lin, Z. Yu, X. Xu, X. Wang, H. K. Liu, W. Sun, S. X. Dou, ACS Catal., 2018, 8, 5382-5390.
[55]	Q. Tu, W. Liu, M. Jiang, W. Wang, Q. Kang, P. Wang, W. Zhou, F. Zhou, ACS Appl. Energy Mater., 2021, 4, 4630-4637.
[56]	R. T. Gao, D. He, L. Wu, K. Hu, X. Liu, Y. Su, L. Wang, Angew. Chem. Int. Ed., 2020, 59, 6213-6218.
[57]	L. Bai, S. Lee, X. Hu, Angew. Chem. Int. Ed., 2021, 60, 3095-3103.
[58]	R. L. Doyle, I. J. Godwin, M. P. Brandon, M. E. G. Lyons, Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys., 2013, 15, 13737-13783.
[59]	S. Klaus, Y. Cai, M. W. Louie, L. Trotochaud, A. T. Bell, J. Phys. Chem. C, 2015, 119, 7243-7254.
[60]	S. Corby, M. G. Tecedor, S. Tengeler, C. Steinert, B. Moss, C. A. Mesa, H. F. Heiba, A. A. Wilson, B. Kaiser, W. Jaegermann, L. Francas, S. Gimenez, J. R. Durrant, Sustain. Energy Fuels, 2020, 4, 5024-5030.
[61]	J. Kwon, H. Han, S. Jo, S. Choi, K. Y. Chung, G. Ali, K. Park, U. Paik, T. Song, Adv. Energy Mater., 2021, 11, 2100624.
[62]	L. Francàs, S. Corby, S. Selim, D. Lee, C. A. Mesa, R. Godin, E. Pastor, I. E. L. Stephens, K. S. Choi, J. R. Durrant, Nat. Commun., 2019, 10, 5208.
[63]	L. Francàs, S. Selim, S. Corby, D. Lee, C. A. Mesa, E. Pastor, K. S. Choi, J. R. Durrant, Chem. Sci., 2021, 12, 7442-7452.
[64]	H. B. Tao, Y. Xu, X. Huang, J. Chen, L. Pei, J. Zhang, J. G. Chen, B. Liu, Joule, 2019, 3, 1498-1509.
[65]	X. Cui, P. Xiao, J. Wang, M. Zhou, W. Guo, Y. Yang, Y. He, Z. Wang, Y. Yang, Y. Zhang, Angew. Chem. Int. Ed., 2017, 129, 4559-4564.
[66]	X. P. Zhang, H. Y. Wang, H. Zheng, W. Zhang, R. Cao, Chin. J. Catal., 2021, 42, 1253-1268.
[67]	X. Li, X. P. Zhang, M. Guo, B. Lv, K. Guo, X. Jin, W. Zhang, Y. M. Lee, S. Fukuzumi, W. Nam, R. Cao, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2021, 143, 14613-14621.
[68]	X. Ren, T. Wu, Y. Sun, Y. Li, G. Xian, X. Liu, C. Shen, J. Gracia, H. J. Gao, H. Yang, Z. J. Xu, Nat. Commun., 2021, 12, 2608.
[69]	L. Bai, C.-S. Hsu, D. T. L. Alexander, H. M. Chen, X. Hu, Nat. Energy, 2021, 6, 1054-1066.
[70]	M. Görlin, P. Chernev, J. Ferreira de Araújo, T. Reier, S. Dresp, B. Paul, R. Krähnert, H. Dau, P. Strasser. Oxygen Evolution Reaction Dynamics, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2016, 138, 5603-5614.
[71]	V. Fidelsky, M. C. Toroker, Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys., 2017, 19, 7491-7497.
[72]	Y. Hao, Y. Li, J. Wu, L. Meng, J. Wang, C. Jia, T. Liu, X. Yang, Z. P. Liu, M. Gong, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2021, 143, 1493-1502.
[73]	M. B. Stevens, C. D. M. Trang, L. J. Enman, J. Deng, S. W. Boettcher, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2017, 139, 11361-11364.
[74]	M. S. Burke, L. J. Enman, A. S. Batchellor, S. Zou, S. W. Boettcher, Chem. Mater., 2015, 27, 7549-7558.
[75]	F. Song, L. Bai, A. Moysiadou, S. Lee, C. Hu, L. Liardet, X. Hu, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2018, 140, 7748-7759.
[76]	Z. Zhang, C. Feng, X. Li, C. Liu, D. Wang, R. Si, J. Yang, S. Zhou, J. Zeng, Nano Lett., 2021, 21, 4795-4801.

镍铁层状双金属氢氧化物在不同pH电解液体系中的析氧反应

Investigation of nickel iron layered double hydroxide for water oxidation in different pH electrolytes

RichHTML

PDF

Supporting Information

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

扫码分享

图/表 5

参考文献

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

[1]	王潇涵, 田汉, 余旭, 陈立松, 崔香枝, 施剑林. 非晶相电催化剂在电解水领域的研究进展[J]. 催化学报, 2023, 51(8): 5-48.
[2]	韩璟怡, 管景奇. 通过表面镧改性和体相锰掺杂协助钴尖晶石酸性下析氧[J]. 催化学报, 2023, 51(8): 1-4.
[3]	张光颖, 刘旭, 张欣欣, 梁志坚, 邢耕宇, 蔡斌, 沈迪, 王蕾, 付宏刚. P修饰提高Fe-N-C的氧反应活性用于高稳定的锌-空气电池[J]. 催化学报, 2023, 49(6): 141-151.
[4]	詹麒尼, 帅婷玉, 徐慧民, 黄陈金, 张志杰, 李高仁. 单原子催化剂的合成及其在电化学能量转换中的应用[J]. 催化学报, 2023, 47(4): 32-66.
[5]	张志普, 卢珊珊, 张兵, 史艳梅. 揭示硫掺杂的碳材料在水电氧化过程中活性苯醌基团及惰性硫残留物的形成[J]. 催化学报, 2023, 47(4): 129-137.
[6]	吴尧, 杨杰夫, 郑媚, 胡点轶, Teddy Salim, 汤碧珺, 刘政, 李述周. 直接化学气相沉积法制备二维钴铁氧体用于高效析氧反应[J]. 催化学报, 2023, 55(12): 265-277.
[7]	杨竣皓, 安露露, 王双, 张辰浩, 罗官宇, 陈应泉, 杨会颖, 王得丽. 层状双氢氧化物基电解水催化剂的缺陷工程调控策略[J]. 催化学报, 2023, 55(12): 116-136.
[8]	吴立清, 梁庆, 赵家仪, 朱娟, 贾宏男, 张伟, 蔡苹, 罗威. 铋掺杂的二氧化钌催化剂用于高效酸性水氧化[J]. 催化学报, 2023, 55(12): 182-190.
[9]	白雪, 韩璟怡, 陈思雨, 牛效迪, 管景奇. 双杂原子配位提高单原子锰位点的析氧活性[J]. 催化学报, 2023, 54(11): 212-219.
[10]	万凯, 罗江水, 刘文博, 张婷, Jordi Arbiol, 张漩, Palaniappan Subramanian, 傅志勇, Jan Fransaer. 金属有机框架衍生的阳离子调控金属硫化物增强析氧反应活性[J]. 催化学报, 2023, 54(11): 290-297.
[11]	张宁, 杜家毅, 周纳, 王德鹏, 鲍迪, 钟海霞, 张新波. 高价金属钽掺杂无定型氧化铱用于酸性氧析出反应[J]. 催化学报, 2023, 53(10): 134-142.
[12]	韩璟怡, 管景奇. 单原子催化剂大数据库[J]. 催化学报, 2023, 44(1): 1-3.
[13]	苏慧, 姜静, 宋少佳, 安博涵, 李宁, 高旸钦, 戈磊. 过渡金属硫化物相关电催化剂的设计与应用研究[J]. 催化学报, 2023, 44(1): 7-49.
[14]	蒋婷婷, 谢伟伟, 耿仕鹏, 李如春, 宋树芹, 王毅. 构建氧空位调控的钼酸钴纳米片用于高效催化析氧反应[J]. 催化学报, 2022, 43(9): 2434-2442.
[15]	乔玉彦, 潘艳秋, 张江威, 王彬, 武婷婷, 范文俊, 曹雨程, Rashid Mehmood, 张飞, 章福祥. 多碳界面工程用于促进NiFe纳米复合电催化剂的产氧反应[J]. 催化学报, 2022, 43(9): 2354-2362.