Fe稳固的FeOOH@NiOOH电催化剂的大电流极化设计与析氧研究

doi:10.1016/S1872-2067(24)60062-8

催化学报 ›› 2024, Vol. 62: 254-264.DOI: 10.1016/S1872-2067(24)60062-8

Fe稳固的FeOOH@NiOOH电催化剂的大电流极化设计与析氧研究

吕青芸^a^,¹, 张伟伟^a^,¹, 龙志鹏^a, 王建涛^a, 邹星礼^a, 任伟^c, 侯龙^a, 鲁雄刚^a, 赵玉峰^d^,^*(), 余兴^a^,^*(), 李喜^a^,^b^,^*()

^a上海大学先进特种钢国家重点实验室, 上海 200444
^b上海交通大学上海高温先进材料及精密成形技术重点实验室, 上海 200240
^c上海大学量子分子结构国际中心和材料基因组工程研究院, 上海 200444
^d上海大学可持续能源研究所和化学系, 上海 200444

收稿日期:2024-04-07 接受日期:2024-05-26 出版日期:2024-07-18 发布日期:2024-07-10
通讯作者: *电子信箱: yufengzhao@shu.edu.cn (赵玉峰), YX02SHU14@shu.edu.cn (余兴), lx_net@sina.com (李喜).
作者简介:¹共同第一作者.
基金资助:
国家自然科学基金(52004155);国家自然科学基金(52174365);国家自然科学基金(52130204);国家自然科学基金(52334009);上海市科学技术委员会(21DZ1208900);上海市科学技术委员会(19DZ2270200);上海市科学技术委员会(20511107700);国家重点研发计划(2023YFB3506701);国家重点研发计划(2022YFB3706801)

Large-current polarization-engineered FeOOH@NiOOH electrocatalyst with stable Fe sites for large-current oxygen evolution reaction

Qingyun Lv^a^,¹, Weiwei Zhang^a^,¹, Zhipeng Long^a, Jiantao Wang^a, Xingli Zou^a, Wei Ren^c, Long Hou^a, Xionggang Lu^a, Yufeng Zhao^d^,^*(), Xing Yu^a^,^*(), Xi Li^a^,^b^,^*()

^aState Key Laboratory of Advanced Special Steels, Shanghai University, Shanghai 200444, China
^bShanghai Key Laboratory of Advanced High-temperature Materials and Precision Forming, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai 200240, China
^cInternational Centre for Quantum and Molecular Structures, Materials Genome Institute and Department of Physics, Shanghai University, Shanghai 200444, China
^dInstitute for Sustainable Energy and Department of Chemistry, Shanghai University, Shanghai 200444, China

Received:2024-04-07 Accepted:2024-05-26 Online:2024-07-18 Published:2024-07-10
Contact: *E-mail: yufengzhao@shu.edu.cn (Y. Zhao), YX02SHU14@shu.edu.cn (X. Yu), lx_net@sina.com (X. Li).
About author:¹ Contributed equally to this work.
Supported by:
National Natural Science Foundation of China(52004155);National Natural Science Foundation of China(52174365);National Natural Science Foundation of China(52130204);National Natural Science Foundation of China(52334009);Science and Technology Commission of Shanghai Municipality(21DZ1208900);Science and Technology Commission of Shanghai Municipality(19DZ2270200);Science and Technology Commission of Shanghai Municipality(20511107700);National Key R&D Program of China(2023YFB3506701);National Key R&D Program of China(2022YFB3706801)

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

电解水技术是制取高纯度氢气的有效途径, 为传统的氢气生产提供了一种可持续的替代方案. 其中, 开发性能优异的电催化材料是降低电解水制氢成本的关键. 析氧反应(OER)由于涉及多个电子转移而导致的动力学缓慢, 是克服高过电位的主要挑战. 镍铁羟基/氢氧化物(NiFe (oxy)hydroxides)是近期研究的热点, 其在碱性条件下具有极低的OER过电位, 部分材料性能甚至超过了贵金属基催化剂, 如IrO₂和RuO₂. 然而, NiFe (oxy)hydroxides的长期催化稳定性, 尤其是在大电流下的长期催化稳定性, 成为限制其实际应用的主要问题, 这主要是由于铁元素的严重流失导致的. 因此, 如何有效控制和利用电化学溶解/沉积动力学成为稳定铁位点的关键.

为克服该挑战, 本文提出了一种大电流极化重构方法来固定活性铁位点. 通过在大电流(1.5 A cm⁻²)下对材料进行表面快速极化重构, 成功制备了FeOOH@NiOOH (eFNO_L)电催化剂. eFNO_L不仅具有稳定的铁位点, 还暴露出高指数晶面, 因此eFNO_L同时展现出较好的OER催化活性和稳定性. 同时, 密度泛函理论计算结果表明, 与具有低指数晶面的FeNiOOH相比, 大电流极化工程制备的分相eFNO_L对铁位点表现出更高的结合能, 可以有效抑制OER过程中的铁流失, 且高指数晶面在改变速率决定步骤和减少吸附能垒上具有更大的优势. 电化学测试结果表明, 经过优化后的eFNO_L催化剂在产生100和500 mA cm⁻²大电流密度仅需234和27 mV的过电位, 并且具有较小的Tafel斜率(35.2 mV dec⁻¹). 由于铁位点结合能的提高, eFNO_L催化剂在500 mA cm⁻²的电流密度下能够稳定催化超过100 h, 且仅有1.5%的性能衰减, 优于近期报道的大多数镍铁基OER催化剂.

综上, 本文为开发高活性和高稳定性能的催化剂提供了一种有效的大电流电化学重构策略, 在电解水制氢领域实现其工业化的大规模应用方面显示出巨大潜力, 有望降低可持续电解水制氢成本.

关键词: 析氧反应, FeOOH@NiOOH, 大电流极化重构, 高指数晶面, 铁位点固定

Abstract:

NiFe-based (oxy)hydroxides are among the most efficient electrocatalysts for the oxygen evolution reaction (OER). However, significant Fe leakage during the OER results in unsatisfactory stability. Herein, a large-current (1.5 A cm⁻²) galvanostatic reconstruction was used to fabricate FeOOH@NiOOH (eFNO_L) with both fixed Fe sites and exposed high-index crystal facets (HIFs). Compared to FeNiOOH with low-index crystal facets, the phase-separated FeOOH@NiOOH showed a higher binding energy towards Fe, and the HIFs significantly improved the catalytic activity of FeOOH. The optimized eFNO_L catalyst exhibits ultralow overpotentials of 234 and 272 mV, yielding substantial current densities of 100 and 500 mA cm⁻², respectively, with a small Tafel slope of 35.2 mV dec⁻¹. Moreover, due to the stabilized Fe sites, its striking stability over 100 h at 500 mA cm⁻² with 1.5% decay outperforms most NiFe-based OER catalysts reported recently. This study provides an effective strategy for developing highly active and stable catalysts via large-current electrochemical reconstruction.

Key words: Oxygen evolution reaction, FeOOH@NiOOH, Large-current electrochemical, reconstruction, High-index crystal facet, Anchor of Fe site

吕青芸, 张伟伟, 龙志鹏, 王建涛, 邹星礼, 任伟, 侯龙, 鲁雄刚, 赵玉峰, 余兴, 李喜. Fe稳固的FeOOH@NiOOH电催化剂的大电流极化设计与析氧研究[J]. 催化学报, 2024, 62: 254-264.

Qingyun Lv, Weiwei Zhang, Zhipeng Long, Jiantao Wang, Xingli Zou, Wei Ren, Long Hou, Xionggang Lu, Yufeng Zhao, Xing Yu, Xi Li. Large-current polarization-engineered FeOOH@NiOOH electrocatalyst with stable Fe sites for large-current oxygen evolution reaction[J]. Chinese Journal of Catalysis, 2024, 62: 254-264.

×
扫码分享

导出引用管理器 EndNote|Ris|BibTeX

链接本文: https://www.cjcatal.com/CN/10.1016/S1872-2067(24)60062-8

https://www.cjcatal.com/CN/Y2024/V62/I7/254

图/表 6

Fig. 1. (a) Schematic preparation of eFNOL. (b) Galvanostatic polarization voltage-time diagram at small (eFNOS) and large currents (eFNOL). (c) XRD spectra of eFNO and 5eFNO. (d) XRD spectra of eFNOL.

Fig. 2. (a) SEM image of eFNOL. (b) TEM image of eFNOL. (c) HRTEM image of 5eFNO. (d?f) HRTEM images of eFNOL. (g) Elemental mapping images of Fe, Ni, and O, and the overlap in eFNOL.

Fig. 3. (a) FTIR spectra of eFNOL, eFNOS, eFNO, and FNO. (b) Raman spectra of eFNOL, eFNOS, eFNO, and FNO. XPS spectra of Ni 2p (c) and Fe 2p (d) for eFNOL, eFNOS, 5eFNO, and eFNO. (e) Variation in the concentration of Fe and Ni ions in the electrolyte with time in the galvanostatic polarization processes at large current and small current. (f) Percentages of Ni, Fe, and O in eFNO, eFNOS, and eFNOL. (g) Schematic of the Fe2O3 to FeOOH transformation by galvanostatic polarization at large and small currents.

Fig. 4. OER activity of eFNO, 5eFNO, eFNOL, eFNOS, and RuO2/NF. (a) LSV polarization graphs; (b) Corresponding Tafel plots; (c) Related Cdl; (d) Nyquist plots corresponding to the LSV curves; (e) OER comparison between this work and other NiFe-based OER catalysts at 100 and 500 mA cm?2.

Fig. 5. (a) Overall water splitting stability tests of 5eFNO‖Pt, eFNOL‖Pt, and eFNO‖Pt for 100 h in 1 mol L?1 KOH at 25 °C. (b) The LSV polarization curves of eFNOL‖Pt before and after the stability test. (c) HRTEM image of eFNOL after the stability test. (d) Concentration of Fe ions in the electrolyte at 0, 5, 10, 20, 50, and 100 h during overall water splitting of 5eFNO‖Pt, eFNOL‖Pt, and eFNO‖Pt, respectively. (e) Percentages of Ni, Fe, and O in eFNO, 5eFNO, and eFNOL before and after the stability test. (f) Variations in the relative energy and corresponding crystal structure of FeNiOOH (101), FeOOH (420), and FeOOH (303) after losing an Fe site, respectively. (g) Stability comparisons of our OER catalyst with other catalysts reported in the literature. The x-axis represents the current, the y-axis represents the retention ratio, and the z-axis represents the measurement time.

Fig. 6. (a) Proposed OER mechanism at Fe sites of FeOOH (420). (b) Crystal structure diagram of FeOOH (304), FeOOH (420), and FeNiOOH (101). (c) Gibbs free energy diagrams of FeNiOOH (101), FeOOH (304), and FeOOH (420) for OER.

参考文献

[1]	S. Jiao, X. Fu, S. Wang, Y. Zhao, Energy Environ. Sci., 2021, 14, 1722-1770.
[2]	Y. Pan, X. Xu, Y. Zhong, L. Ge, Y. Chen, J. M. Veder, D. Guan, R. O'Hayre, M. Li, G. Wang, H. Wang, W. Zhou, Z. Shao, Nat. Commun., 2020, 11, 2002.
[3]	K. Zhu, X. Zhu, W. Yang, Angew Chem. Int. Ed., 2019, 58, 1252-1265.
[4]	J. Liu, Y. Liu, X. Mu, H. Jang, Z. Lei, S. Jiao, P. Yan, M. G. Kim, R. Cao, Adv. Funct. Mater., 2022, 32, 2204086.
[5]	L. Gao, X. Cui, C. D. Sewell, J. Li, Z. Lin, Chem. Soc. Rev., 2021, 50,8428-8469.
[6]	J. Zhao, J. J. Zhang, Z. Y. Li, X. H. Bu, Small, 2020, 16, 2003916.
[7]	X. Bo, R. K. Hocking, S. Zhou, Y. Li, X. Chen, J. Zhuang, Y. Du, C. Zhao, Energy Environ. Sci., 2020, 13, 4225-4237.
[8]	J. M. P. Martirez, E. A. Carter, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2019, 141, 693-705.
[9]	M. B. Stevens, L. J. Enman, E. H. Korkus, J. Zaffran, C. D. M. Trang, J. Asbury, M. G. Kast, M. C. Toroker, S. W. Boettcher, Nano Res., 2019, 12, 2288-2295.
[10]	J. Jiang, F. Sun, S. Zhou, W. Hu, H. Zhang, J. Dong, Z. Jiang, J. Zhao, J. Li, W. Yan, M. Wang, Nat. Commun., 2018, 9, 2885.
[11]	H. Shin, H. Xiao, W. A. Goddard, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2018, 140, 6745-6748.
[12]	Z. He, J. Zhang, Z. Gong, H. Lei, D. Zhou, N. Zhang, W. Mai, S. Zhao, Y. Chen, Nat. Commun., 2022, 13, 2191.
[13]	C. Xiao, B. A. Lu, P. Xue, N. Tian, Z. Y. Zhou, X. Lin, W. F. Lin, S. G. Sun, Joule, 2020, 4, 2562-2598.
[14]	N. Tian, B.-A. Lu, X.-D. Yang, R. Huang, Y.-X. Jiang, Z.-Y. Zhou, S.-G. Sun, Electrochem. Energy Rev., 2018, 1, 54-83.
[15]	C. Luan, Q. X. Zhou, Y. Wang, Y. Xiao, X. Dai, X. L. Huang, X. Zhang, Small, 2017, 13,1702617.
[16]	Y.-R. Li, M.-X. Li, S.-N. Li, Y.-J. Liu, J. Chen, Y. Wang, Rare Metals, 2021, 40, 3406-3441.
[17]	X. Li, X. Hao, A. Abudula, G. Guan, J. Mater. Chem. A, 2016, 4, 11973-12000.
[18]	F. Dionigi, P. Strasser, Adv. Energy Mater., 2016, 6, 1600621.
[19]	C. Kuai, Z. Xu, C. Xi, A. Hu, Z. Yang, Y. Zhang, C.-J. Sun, L. Li, D. Sokaras, C. Dong, S.-Z. Qiao, X.-W. Du, F. Lin, Nat. Catal., 2020, 3, 743-753.
[20]	E. Fabbri, M. Nachtegaal, T. Binninger, X. Cheng, B. J. Kim, J. Durst, F. Bozza, T. Graule, R. Schaublin, L. Wiles, M. Pertoso, N. Danilovic, K. E. Ayers, T. J. Schmidt, Nat. Mater., 2017, 16, 925-931.
[21]	J. Liu, W. Du, S. Guo, J. Pan, J. Hu, X. Xu, Adv. Sci., 2023, 10, 2300717.
[22]	H. Liu, L. Yang, K. Qiao, X. Zeng, Y. Huang, L. Zheng, D. Cao, Nano Energy, 2020, 76, 105115.
[23]	X. Yan, M. Gu, Y. Wang, L. Xu, Y. Tang, R. Wu, Nano Res., 2020, 13, 975-982.
[24]	J. Chi, L. Guo, J. Mao, T. Cui, J. Zhu, Y. Xia, J. Lai, L. Wang, Adv. Funct. Mater., 2023, 33, 2300625.
[25]	P. E. Blochl, Phys. Rev. B, 1994, 50, 17953-17979.
[26]	G. Kresse, J. Hafner, Phys. Rev. B, 1993, 48, 13115-13118.
[27]	G. Kresse, J. Furthmüller, Comput. Mater. Sci., 1996, 6, 15-50.
[28]	X. Liu, Y. Lin, J. Feng, Phys. Rev. B, 2023, 108, 094405.
[29]	H. Haryadi, E. Suprayoga, E. Suhendi, Mater. Res., 2022, 25, e20210554.
[30]	S. Grimme, J. Comput. Chem., 2006, 27, 1787-1799.
[31]	H. Gong, C. Bao, X. Luo, Y. Yu, W. Yang, Microchem. J., 2024, 198, 110109.
[32]	X. Guo, L. Qiu, M. Li, F. Tian, X. Ren, S. Jie, S. Geng, G. Han, Y. Huang, Y. Song, W. Yang, Y. Yu, Chem. Eng. J., 2024, 483, 149264.
[33]	X. Ren, M. Li, L. Qiu, X. Guo, F. Tian, G. Han, W. Yang, Y. Yu, J. Mater. Chem. A, 2023, 11, 5754-5765.
[34]	Y. Wang, S. Bao, X. Liu, L. Qiu, J. Sheng, W. Yang, Y. Yu, Chem. Eng. J., 2023, 477, 147050.
[35]	L. Li, F. Tian, L. Qiu, F. Wu, W. Yang, and Y. Yu, Catalysts, 2023, 13, 1497.
[36]	H. J. Liu, S. Zhang, W. Y. Yang, N. Yu, C. Y. Liu, Y. M. Chai, B. Dong, Adv. Funct. Mater., 2023, 33, 2303776.
[37]	C. Liu, N. Zhang, Y. Li, R. Fan, W. Wang, J. Feng, C. Liu, J. Wang, W. Hao, Z. Li, Z. Zou, Nat. Commun., 2023, 14, 4266.
[38]	X. Cao, P. Wen, R. Ma, Y. Liu, S. Sun, Q. Ma, P. Zhang, Y. Qiu, Chem. Eng. J., 2022, 449, 137792.
[39]	F. Meng, S. A. Morin, S. Jin, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2011, 133, 8408-8411.
[40]	Y. J. Lee, S. K. Park, Small, 2022, 18, 2200586.
[41]	Z. Y. Wang, B. Zhang, S. Liu, G. R. Li, T. Yan, X. P. Gao, Adv. Funct. Mater., 2022, 32, 2200893.
[42]	X. Zhang, Z. Zhang, H. Li, R. Gao, M. Xiao, J. Zhu, M. Feng, Z. Chen, Adv. Energy Mater., 2022, 12, 2201461.
[43]	M. Srivastava, M. Elias Uddin, J. Singh, N. H. Kim, J. H. Lee, J. Alloys Compd., 2014, 590, 266-276.
[44]	A. Pendashteh, J. Palma, M. Anderson, R. Marcilla, Appl. Catal. B, 2017, 201, 241-252.
[45]	Y. Sun, J. Wu, Y. Xie, X. Wang, K. Ma, Z. Tian, Z. Zhang, Q. Liao, W. Zheng, Z. Kang, Y. Zhang, Adv. Funct. Mater., 2022, 32, 2207116.
[46]	J. Yuan, X. Cheng, C. Lei, B. Yang, Z. Li, K. Luo, K. H. Koko Lam, L. Lei, Y. Hou, K. K. Ostrikov, Engineering, 2021, 7, 1306-1312.
[47]	J. Feng, M. Chen, P. Zhou, D. Liu, Y.-Y. Chen, B. He, H. Bai, D. Liu, W. F. Ip, S. Chen, D. Liu, W. Feng, J. Ni, H. Pan, Mater. Today Energy, 2022, 27, 101005.
[48]	L. Peng, N. Yang, Y. Yang, Q. Wang, X. Xie, D. Sun-Waterhouse, L. Shang, T. Zhang, G. I. N. Waterhouse, Angew Chem. Int. Ed., 2021, 60, 24612-24619.
[49]	M. Cai, Q. Zhu, X. Wang, Z. Shao, L. Yao, H. Zeng, X. Wu, J. Chen, K. Huang, S. Feng, Adv. Mater., 2023, 35, 2209338.
[50]	Q. lv, B. Yao, W. Zhang, L. She, W. Ren, L. Hou, Y. Fautrelle, X. Lu, X. Yu, X. Li, Chem. Eng. J., 2022, 446, 137420.
[51]	B. Singh, P. Mannu, Y. C. Huang, R. Prakash, S. Shen, C. L. Dong, A. Indra, Angew Chem. Int. Ed., 2022, 61, e202211585.
[52]	J. Hu, I. Lo, G. Chen, Sep. Purif. Technol., 2007, 58, 76-82.
[53]	Y. Wang, B. Liu, X. Shen, H. Arandiyan, T. Zhao, Y. Li, M. Garbrecht, Z. Su, L. Han, A. Tricoli, C. Zhao, Adv. Energy Mater., 2021, 11, 202003759.
[54]	Z. Yang, B. Zhang, C. Yan, Z. Xue, T. Mu, Appl. Catal. B, 2023, 330, 122590.
[55]	H. Liu, S. Zhu, Z. Cui, Z. Li, S. Wu, Y. Liang, Nanoscale, 2021, 13, 1759-1769.
[56]	D. Friebel, M. W. Louie, M. Bajdich, K. E. Sanwald, Y. Cai, A. M. Wise, M. J. Cheng, D. Sokaras, T. C. Weng, R. Alonso-Mori, R. C. Davis, J. R. Bargar, J. K. Norskov, A. Nilsson, A. T. Bell, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2015, 137, 1305-1313.
[57]	B. Wu, S. Gong, Y. Lin, T. Li, A. Chen, M. Zhao, Q. Zhang, L. Chen, Adv. Mater., 2022, 34, e2108619.
[58]	K. Wang, H. Du, S. He, L. Liu, K. Yang, J. Sun, Y. Liu, Z. Du, L. Xie, W. Ai, W. Huang, Kinetically Controlled, Adv. Mater., 2021, 33, e2005587.
[59]	M. Chen, Y. Zhang, J. Chen, R. Wang, B. Zhang, B. Song, P. Xu, Small, 2024, 10.1002/smll.202309371.
[60]	R. Hou, X. Yang, L. Su, W. Cen, L. Ye, D. Sun, Nanoscale, 2023, 15, 18858-18863.
[61]	X. Rong, J. Parolin, A. M. Kolpak, ACS Catal., 2016, 6, 1153-1158.
[62]	A. Grimaud, A. Demortière, M. Saubanère, W. Dachraoui, M. Duchamp, M.-L. Doublet, J.-M. Tarascon, Nat. Energy, 2016, 2, 16189.

Fe稳固的FeOOH@NiOOH电催化剂的大电流极化设计与析氧研究

Large-current polarization-engineered FeOOH@NiOOH electrocatalyst with stable Fe sites for large-current oxygen evolution reaction

RichHTML

PDF

Supporting Information

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

扫码分享

图/表 6

参考文献

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

[1]	朱鸿睿, 徐慧民, 黄陈金, 张志杰, 詹麒尼, 帅婷玉, 李高仁. 光电催化析氧和CO₂还原反应催化剂的研究进展[J]. 催化学报, 2024, 62(7): 53-107.
[2]	郭静雅, 刘炜, 商文喆, 司端惠, 朱超, 胡金文, 辛存存, 程旭升, 张松林, 宋俗禅, 王秀云, 史彦涛. 完全暴露的碳基电极边缘-平面位点用于高效水氧化[J]. 催化学报, 2024, 60(5): 272-283.
[3]	Adel Al-Salihy, 梁策, Abdulwahab Salah, Abdel-Basit Al-Odayni, 卢子昂, 陈孟新, 刘倩倩, 徐平. 用于提升全水解性能的超低含量Ru掺杂NiMoO₄@Ni₃(PO₄)₂核壳纳米结构[J]. 催化学报, 2024, 60(5): 360-375.
[4]	罗健颖, 傅捷, 叶丰铭, 梁汉锋, 王伟俊. 释放多孔纳米结构的活力: 可持续电催化水分解[J]. 催化学报, 2024, 58(3): 37-85.
[5]	王潇涵, 田汉, 余旭, 陈立松, 崔香枝, 施剑林. 非晶相电催化剂在电解水领域的研究进展[J]. 催化学报, 2023, 51(8): 5-48.
[6]	韩璟怡, 管景奇. 通过表面镧改性和体相锰掺杂协助钴尖晶石酸性下析氧[J]. 催化学报, 2023, 51(8): 1-4.
[7]	张光颖, 刘旭, 张欣欣, 梁志坚, 邢耕宇, 蔡斌, 沈迪, 王蕾, 付宏刚. P修饰提高Fe-N-C的氧反应活性用于高稳定的锌-空气电池[J]. 催化学报, 2023, 49(6): 141-151.
[8]	詹麒尼, 帅婷玉, 徐慧民, 黄陈金, 张志杰, 李高仁. 单原子催化剂的合成及其在电化学能量转换中的应用[J]. 催化学报, 2023, 47(4): 32-66.
[9]	张志普, 卢珊珊, 张兵, 史艳梅. 揭示硫掺杂的碳材料在水电氧化过程中活性苯醌基团及惰性硫残留物的形成[J]. 催化学报, 2023, 47(4): 129-137.
[10]	吴尧, 杨杰夫, 郑媚, 胡点轶, Teddy Salim, 汤碧珺, 刘政, 李述周. 直接化学气相沉积法制备二维钴铁氧体用于高效析氧反应[J]. 催化学报, 2023, 55(12): 265-277.
[11]	杨竣皓, 安露露, 王双, 张辰浩, 罗官宇, 陈应泉, 杨会颖, 王得丽. 层状双氢氧化物基电解水催化剂的缺陷工程调控策略[J]. 催化学报, 2023, 55(12): 116-136.
[12]	吴立清, 梁庆, 赵家仪, 朱娟, 贾宏男, 张伟, 蔡苹, 罗威. 铋掺杂的二氧化钌催化剂用于高效酸性水氧化[J]. 催化学报, 2023, 55(12): 182-190.
[13]	白雪, 韩璟怡, 陈思雨, 牛效迪, 管景奇. 双杂原子配位提高单原子锰位点的析氧活性[J]. 催化学报, 2023, 54(11): 212-219.
[14]	万凯, 罗江水, 刘文博, 张婷, Jordi Arbiol, 张漩, Palaniappan Subramanian, 傅志勇, Jan Fransaer. 金属有机框架衍生的阳离子调控金属硫化物增强析氧反应活性[J]. 催化学报, 2023, 54(11): 290-297.
[15]	张宁, 杜家毅, 周纳, 王德鹏, 鲍迪, 钟海霞, 张新波. 高价金属钽掺杂无定型氧化铱用于酸性氧析出反应[J]. 催化学报, 2023, 53(10): 134-142.