共价有机框架中氢键的构筑: 加速质子耦合电子转移以提升光催化合成过氧化氢性能

doi:10.1016/S1872-2067(26)64975-3

催化学报 ›› 2026, Vol. 84: 274-287.DOI: 10.1016/S1872-2067(26)64975-3

共价有机框架中氢键的构筑: 加速质子耦合电子转移以提升光催化合成过氧化氢性能

孙冉^a, 张雨琦^a, 侯琨格^a, 谭钰杰^a^,^d, 刘新刚^b, 侯剑源^a, 赵玮璇^c, Andrew E. H. Wheatley^d(), 张仁熙^a()

^a 复旦大学环境科学研究所, 先进涂料国家重点实验室, 上海 200433
^b 复旦大学分析测试中心, 上海 200433
^c 河南省科学院光资源与环境科学研究所, 河南郑州 450000
^d 剑桥大学化学系, 剑桥, 英国

收稿日期:2025-09-04 接受日期:2025-10-28 出版日期:2026-05-18 发布日期:2026-04-16
通讯作者: *电子信箱: zrx@fudan.edu.cn (张仁熙),
aehw2@cam.ac.uk (A. Wheatley).
基金资助:
上海市生态环境局科研项目(沪环科[2025]第25号)

Designing hydrogen-bonds in covalent organic frameworks: accelerating proton-coupled electron transfer for enhanced photocatalytic H₂O₂ synthesis

Ran Sun^a, Yuqi Zhang^a, Kunge Hou^a, Yujie Tan^a^,^d, Xingang Liu^b, Jianyuan Hou^a, Weixuan Zhao^c, Andrew E. H. Wheatley^d(), Renxi Zhang^a()

^a State Key Laboratory of Coatings for Advanced Equipment, Institute of Environmental Science, Fudan University, Shanghai 200433, China
^b Center of Analysis and Measurement, Fudan University, Shanghai 200433, China
^c Institute of Light Resources and Environmental Sciences, Henan Academy of Sciences, Zhengzhou 450000, Henan, China
^d Yusuf Hamied Department of Chemistry, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, CB2 1EW, United Kingdom

Received:2025-09-04 Accepted:2025-10-28 Online:2026-05-18 Published:2026-04-16
Contact: *E-mail: zrx@fudan.edu.cn (R. Zhang),
aehw2@cam.ac.uk (A. Wheatley).
Supported by:
Special Projects of the Shanghai Municipal Bureau of Ecology and Environment Scientific Research Project(Huhuanke [2025] 25)

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

过氧化氢(H₂O₂)作为一种重要的绿色氧化剂, 在环境治理与清洁能源领域具有广泛应用. 目前, 其生产仍严重依赖高能耗的蒽醌法, 开发高效、可持续的光催化合成方法具有重要意义.共价有机框架(COFs)因其可调控的孔道结构、高比表面积和优异的光电性能, 在光催化H₂O₂合成中展现出潜力. 然而, 其性能受限于质子耦合电子转移(PCET)过程的动力学迟缓, 尤其是水氧化反应(WOR)与氧还原反应(ORR)之间的质子供需失衡. 传统策略依赖外源质子给体, 不仅增加成本, 也加剧材料腐蚀. 因此, 构建内源性质子传递通道成为突破该瓶颈的关键.

针对上述挑战, 本文创新性地提出了一种基于射频等离子体后修饰的氢键工程策略, 通过在COF骨架中精准构建氢键强度梯度(OH···N与SH···N), 系统研究氢键强度对PCET路径的调控机制与增效原理. 该策略的核心在于利用等离子体技术在温和条件下对COF骨架中的亚胺键(C=N)进行选择性官能化, 分别引入羟基(-OH)和巯基(-SH), 形成具有不同氢键强度的功能化COF材料(OH-COF与SH-COF). 研究结果表明, 适度增强的SH···N氢键不仅可作为“动态质子储库”, 有效缓冲由缓慢WOR过程产生的质子, 还能构建起高效的“质子传递高速通道”, 实现质子的快速迁移与按需释放, 从而协同促进质子迁移与电子传输过程. 实验与理论计算相结合的结果进一步表明, SH-COF中的SH···N氢键能够显著降低直接2e^- ORR路径的反应能垒达19.6%, 同时将4e^- WOR过程的能垒大幅降低49.7%, 并有效抑制高能中间体(如^•O₂^-)的生成, 从而引导反应优先沿高效的直接2e^- ORR路径进行, 极大提升了H₂O₂合成的选择性与效率. SH-COF在纯水条件下、无助剂参与时, 光催化H₂O₂产率高达1963.7 μmol g^-1 h^-1, 分别为OH-COF和原始COF的2.97倍与4.70倍, 展现出卓越的光催化性能. 通过H₂¹⁸O同位素标记实验进一步证实, 所产生的H₂O₂中的氧原子同时来源于水分子和氧气, 为氢键网络促进的PCET协同机制提供了直接证据. 此外, 研究还通过集成晶体轨道哈密顿布居分析, 定量揭示了氢键强度与电荷转移效率之间的内在构效关系, 明确了氢键能量与PCET动力学之间的直接关联, 为理解氢键在光催化多电子反应中的热力学调控作用提供了坚实的理论依据.

综上, 本研究不仅提供了一种快速、绿色的等离子体修饰策略用于COF材料的后合成功能化, 更从机制层面深化了对氢键在光催化多电子反应中作用的理解, 为实现高效、稳定、可持续的光催化H₂O₂合成开辟了新路径.

关键词: 共价有机框架, 氢键, 过氧化氢, 光催化, 氧还原, 质子耦合电子转移

Abstract:

The photocatalytic efficiency of covalent organic frameworks (COFs) toward sustainable H₂O₂ synthesis via oxygen reduction reaction (ORR) is intrinsically constrained by compromised proton-coupled electron transfer (PCET) dynamics, where retarded water oxidation reaction kinetics and exogenous proton donor dependence create a dual kinetic-thermodynamic constraint. This work presents a precision hydrogen‒bond engineering strategy through the radio-frequency plasma modification of COF linkages, establishing a hydrogen‒bond strength gradient (OH···N vs. SH···N) to probe the structure-function interplay that modulates PCET pathways. Systematic investigations reveal that hydrogen‒bond strengthening at imine linkages enables dual functionality: creating both dynamic proton reservoirs and more accessible proton conduction pathways. This synergistic regulation reduces the energy barrier for direct 2e^‒ ORR by 19.6% while suppressing high-energy intermediates in stepwise pathways, as confirmed by experiments and density functional theory calculations. The optimized SH-COF with appropriately stronger hydrogen bonds achieves exceptional photocatalytic H₂O₂ production: 2.97 and 4.70 times that of corresponding OH-COF and pristine COF, respectively. Integrated crystal orbital Hamilton population analysis quantitatively correlates hydrogen‒bond strength with charge transfer efficiency, establishing a relationship between hydrogen‒bond energy and PCET kinetics. Our findings not only demonstrate plasma modification as an effective strategy for post-synthetic hydrogen‒bond tuning but fundamentally advance the understanding of how hydrogen-bond thermodynamics govern PCET mechanisms.

Key words: Covalent organic framework, Hydrogen-bond, Hydrogen peroxide, Photocatalysis, Oxygen reduction reaction, Proton-coupled electron transfer

孙冉, 张雨琦, 侯琨格, 谭钰杰, 刘新刚, 侯剑源, 赵玮璇, Andrew E. H. Wheatley, 张仁熙. 共价有机框架中氢键的构筑: 加速质子耦合电子转移以提升光催化合成过氧化氢性能[J]. 催化学报, 2026, 84: 274-287.

Ran Sun, Yuqi Zhang, Kunge Hou, Yujie Tan, Xingang Liu, Jianyuan Hou, Weixuan Zhao, Andrew E. H. Wheatley, Renxi Zhang. Designing hydrogen-bonds in covalent organic frameworks: accelerating proton-coupled electron transfer for enhanced photocatalytic H₂O₂ synthesis[J]. Chinese Journal of Catalysis, 2026, 84: 274-287.

×
扫码分享

导出引用管理器 EndNote|Ris|BibTeX

链接本文: https://www.cjcatal.com/CN/10.1016/S1872-2067(26)64975-3

https://www.cjcatal.com/CN/Y2026/V84/I5/274

图/表 6

Fig. 1. (a) The synthetic routes to, and molecular structures of, COF, OH-COF and SH-COF. PXRD patterns of COF (b), OH-COF (c), and SH-COF (d) with experimental data and simulated patterns. Pawley refined profiles and corresponding refinement differences are included for comparison.

Fig. 2. N2 adsorption-desorption isotherms (a), FTIR spectra (b), thermogravimetric analysis (c), and N 1s (d), and C 1s (e) high-resolution XPS spectra of COFs prepared in this work. (f) The S 2p high-resolution XPS spectrum of SH-COF. (g) Water contact angle and image. (h) TEM image of SH-COF. (i) HAADF-STEM electron image and EDS mapping for C, N, S in SH-COF.

Fig. 3. UV-vis DRS spectra (a), Tauc plots (b), VB-XPS data (c), Mott-Schottky plots (d), energy band structures (e), PL emission spectra (f), TRPL spectra (g), transient photocurrent responses (h), and EIS Nyquist curves (i) of COF, OH-COF and SH-COF.

Fig. 4. (a) Time-dependent H2O2 photogeneration over COF, OH-COF and SH-COF in pure H2O without the addition of sacrificial agents and using the reaction conditions: 25 mg photocatalyst, 50 mL H2O, 298 K. (b) Comparison of photocatalytic H2O2 production for COF, OH-COF and SH-COF under different atmospheres (Ar, Air, O2). (c) Wavelength-dependent AQY values and the UV-vis spectrum of SH-COF. (d) Cycling stability of H2O2 production of SH-COF, the concentration of H2O2 obtained in the fifth cycle was still 3708.2 μmol g?1. (e) The comparison of the photocatalytic H2O2 production for SH-COF at different O2 concentrations. (f) The effects of sacrificial reagents on production rate of H2O2 for SH-COF. (g) EPR spectra obtained in the presence of DMPO as an electron-trapping agent. (h) The LSV curves for SH-COF measured on a RDE at different rotating speeds. (i) Electron transfer number (n) obtained by RDE measurements.

Fig. 5. (a) The HOMOs and LUMOs of COF, OH-COF and SH-COF with an iso-surface level of 1.0×10?8 eV ??3. (b) The ICOHP of hydrogen bonds in OH-COF and SH-COF. Bader charges of N and C atoms in the linkage positions of COF (c), OH-COF (d), and SH-COF (e), highlighting the length of hydrogen bonds in OH-COF and SH-COF.

Fig. 6. In-situ DRIFTS spectra of COF (a), OH-COF (b), and SH-COF (c) collected at different irradiation times during the photocatalytic process in an O2 atmosphere. (d) Isotope labeling experiment for SH-COF in H218O system after visible light irradiation for 20 h. (e) The reaction coordinates for 2e- ORR to H2O2 under U = 0 eV. (f) The reaction coordinates for 4e? WOR to O2 under U = 0 eV. (g) A summary of reaction mechanisms.

参考文献

[1]	Y. Ma, H. Sun, Q. Wang, L. Sun, Z. Liu, Y. Xie, Q. Zhang, C. Su, D. Fan, Appl. Catal. B, 2023, 335, 122878.
[2]	C. Dong, Y. Yang, X. Hu, Y. Cho, G. Jang, Y. Ao, L. Wang, J. Shen, J. H. Park, K. Zhang, Nat. Commun., 2022, 13, 4982.
[3]	Z. Yong, T. Ma, Angew. Chem. Int. Ed., 2023, 62, e202308980.
[4]	H. Hou, X. Zeng, X. Zhang, Angew. Chem. Int. Ed., 2020, 59, 17356-17376.
[5]	D. N. Ampong, E. Effah, E. A. Tsiwah, A. Kumar, E. Agyekum, E. N. A. Doku, O. Issaka, F. O. Agyemang, K. Mensah-Darkwa, R. K. Gupta, Coord. Chem. Rev., 2024, 519, 216121.
[6]	W. Zhao, L. Luo, M. Cong, X. Liu, Z. Zhang, M. Bahri, B. Li, J. Yang, M. Yu, L. Liu, Y. Xia, N. D. Browning, W.-H. Zhu, W. Zhang, A. I. Cooper, Nat. Commun., 2024, 15, 6482.
[7]	Y. Tang, W. Wang, J. Ran, C. Peng, Z. Xu, W. Chu, Energy Environ. Sci., 2024, 17, 6482-6498.
[8]	A. Hayat, Z. Ajmal, A. Y. A. Alzahrani, S. Ben Moussa, M. Khered, N. Almuqati, A. Alshammari, Y. Al-Hadeethi, H. Ali, Y. Orooji, Coord. Chem. Rev., 2025, 522, 216218.
[9]	T. Freese, J. T. Meijer, B. L. Feringa, S. B. Beil, Nat. Catal., 2023, 6, 553-558.
[10]	E. C. M. Tse, C. J. Barile, N. A. Kirchschlager, Y. Li, J. P. Gewargis, S. C. Zimmerman, A. Hosseini, A. A. Gewirth, Nat. Mater., 2016, 15, 754-759.
[11]	C. Sun, Y. Han, H. Guo, R. Zhao, Y. Liu, Z. Lin, Z. Xiao, Z. Sun, M. Luo, S. Guo, Adv. Mater., 2025, 37, 2502990.
[12]	Z. Li, K. Tong, H. Dong, Y. Li, K. Wang, T. Ding, Y. Yun, Y. Zhou, M. Zhu, Angew. Chem. Int. Ed., 2025, 64, e202502390.
[13]	S. Wu, X. Quan, ACS EST Eng., 2022, 2, 1068-1079.
[14]	R. Zhang, H. Xu, Z. Huang, J. Zhang, L. Liu, Z. Ma, Z. Zhang, K. Wang, P. Liu, H. Liu, X. Zheng, Adv. Funct. Mater., 2025, 35, 2420504.
[15]	C. Meng, Y. Zhao, W. Zhu, T. Ben, Small, 2025, 21, 2409238.
[16]	S. He, F. Huang, Q. Wu, P. Zhang, Y. Xiong, J. Yang, R. Zhang, F. Wang, L. Chen, T. L. Liu, F. Li, Angew. Chem. Int. Ed., 2021, 60, 25839-25845.
[17]	L. F. Cotter, B. P. Rimgard, G. A. Parada, J. M. Mayer, L. Hammarström, J. Phys. Chem. A, 2021, 125, 7670-7684.
[18]	Q. Zhu, L. Shi, Z. Li, G. Li, X. Xu, Angew. Chem. Int. Ed., 2024, 63, e202408041.
[19]	C. Wang, H. Li, F. Shen, S. Ge, X. Zhang, J. Ma, K. Zhang, J. Qian, B. Pan, Appl. Catal. B, 2025, 361, 124672.
[20]	Z. Sun, X. Zang, Q. Zhou, M. Ohashi, K. N. Houk, J. Zhou, Y. Tang, Nat. Catal., 2025, 8, 218-228.
[21]	K. Saito, M. Mandal, H. Ishikita, Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys., 2020, 22, 25467-25473.
[22]	K. R. Yang, K. V. Lakshmi, G. W. Brudvig, V. S. Batista, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2021, 143, 8324-8332.
[23]	S. Dai, L.-M. Funk, F. R. von Pappenheim, V. Sautner, M. Paulikat, B. Schröder, J. Uranga, R. A. Mata, K. Tittmann, Nature, 2019, 573, 609-613.
[24]	C. Wang, Z. Wang, H. Sun, S. Yao, Z. Liu, M. Lv, F. Li, Z. Lv, X. Hu, W. Zhou, J. Fan, H. Wang, L. Liu, Appl. Catal. B, 2025, 366, 125006.
[25]	A. Shokri, Y. Wang, G. A. O’Doherty, X.-B. Wang, S. R. Kass, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2013, 135, 17919-17924.
[26]	X. Zhang, Y. Liu, S. Feng, X. Gu, M. Zhou, H. Wang, J. Hua, Appl. Catal. B, 2025, 366, 125013.
[27]	L. Zhang, Q.-H. Zhu, Y.-R. Zhou, S.-L. Wang, J. Fu, J.-Y. Liu, G.-H. Zhang, L. Ma, G. Tao, G.-H. Tao, L. He, Nat. Commun., 2023, 14, 8181.
[28]	N. A. Rejali, M. Dinari, Y. Wang, Chem. Commun., 2023, 59, 11631-11647.
[29]	Y. Wang, J. Fu, J. Xu, H. Hu, D. Ho, ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces, 2023, 15, 12232-12239.
[30]	X. Sun, J. Bao, K. Li, M. D. Argyle, G. Tan, H. Adidharma, K. Zhang, M. Fan, P. Ning, Adv. Funct. Mater., 2021, 31, 2006287.
[31]	S. Kandambeth, D. B. Shinde, M. K. Panda, B. Lukose, T. Heine, R. Banerjee, Angew. Chem. Int. Ed., 2013, 52, 13052-13056.
[32]	D. Wei, W. Zhao, Z. Tian, Y. Zhi, Y. Zhang, X. Liu, ACS Appl. Polym. Mater., 2024, 6, 14688-14694.
[33]	L. D. Tran, D. C. Moore, B. C. Patra, J. Choi, C. M. Hampton, M. E. Loveday, D. D. Bhagwandin, I. Renggli, C. Muratore, L. F. Drummy, D. Zhao, N. R. Glavin, L. A. Baldwin, Adv. Funct. Mater., 2024, 34, 2402208.
[34]	W. Zhang, L. Chen, S. Dai, C. Zhao, C. Ma, L. Wei, M. Zhu, S. Y. Chong, H. Yang, L. Liu, Y. Bai, M. Yu, Y. Xu, X.-W. Zhu, Q. Zhu, S. An, R. S. Sprick, M. A. Little, X. Wu, S. Jiang, Y. Wu, Y.-B. Zhang, H. Tian, W.-H. Zhu, A. I. Cooper, Nature, 2022, 604, 72-79.
[35]	Z. Zhou, M. Sun, Y. Zhu, P. Li, Y. Zhang, M. Wang, Y. Shen, Appl. Catal. B, 2023, 334, 122862.
[36]	L. Bi, J. Xiao, Y. Song, T. Sun, M. Luo, Y. Wang, P. Dong, Y. Zhang, Y. Yao, J. Liao, S. Wang, S. Chou, Carbon Energy, 2024, 6, e544.
[37]	B. Zhu, R. Luo, C. Hou, Y. Gao, Y. Zhang, K. Wang, L. Zhang, J. Luo, Chem. Eng. J., 2024, 497, 154885.
[38]	H. Li, Y. Li, X. Lv, C. Liu, N. Zhang, J. Zang, P. Yue, Y. Gao, C. Liu, Y. Li, Adv. Mater., 2025, 37, 2415126.
[39]	W. Wu, Z. Li, S. Liu, D. Zhang, B. Cai, Y. Liang, M. Wu, Y. Liao, X. Zhao, Angew. Chem. Int. Ed., 2024, 63, e202404563.
[40]	Z. Luo, S. Zhu, H. Xue, W. Yang, F. Zhang, F. Xu, W. Lin, H. Wang, X. Chen, Angew. Chem. Int. Ed., 2025, 64, e202420217.
[41]	X. Zhang, Z. Xiao, L. Jiao, H. Wu, Y.-X. Tan, J. Lin, D. Yuan, Y. Wang, Angew. Chem. Int. Ed., 2024, 63, e202408697.
[42]	Y. Li, T. Hu, R. Chen, R. Xiang, Q. Wang, Y. Zeng, C. He, Chem. Eng. J., 2020, 398, 125566.
[43]	L. Liu, X. Xie, Y. Li, X. Hu, B. Long, G.-J. Deng, T. Song, Appl. Catal. B, 2026, 381, 125821.
[44]	Z. Liu, L. Gong, G. Gao, J. Wang, H. Pan, X. Yang, B. Yu, Q. Xu, W. Liu, X. Chen, D. Qi, K. Wang, J. Jiang, Energy Storage Mater., 2025, 74, 103931.
[45]	P.-K. Zhou, Z. Yu, T. Zeng, C. Zhang, Y. Huang, Q. Chen, C. Lin, L. Zhao, X. Chen, Nano Lett., 2025, 25, 5891-5898.
[46]	Z. Yu, F. Yu, M. Xu, S. Feng, J. Qiu, J. Hua, Adv. Sci., 2025, 12, 2415194.
[47]	X. Zhang, J. Zhang, J. Miao, X. Wen, C. Chen, B. Zhou, M. Long, Chem. Eng. J., 2023, 466, 143085.
[48]	X. Yang, Z.-X. Pan, J.-Y. Yue, X. Li, G. Liu, Q. Xu, G. Zeng, Small, 2024, 20, 2405907.
[49]	S. Mao, J.-W. Shi, G. Sun, Y. Zhang, X. Ji, Y. Lv, B. Wang, Y. Xu, Y. Cheng, Chem. Eng. J., 2021, 404, 126533.
[50]	C.-Q. Han, J.-X. Guo, S. Sun, Z.-Y. Wang, L. Wang, X.-Y. Liu, Small, 2024, 20, 2405887.
[51]	Y. Lu, Y. Guo, S. Zhang, L. Li, R. Jiang, D. Zhang, J. C. Yu, J. Wang, ACS Nano, 2024, 18, 20435-20448.
[52]	L. Wang, C. Han, S. Gao, J.-X. Jiang, Y. Zhang, ACS Catal., 2025, 15, 5683-5693.
[53]	Q. Huang, H. Zhang, H. Yang, Z. Yu, Z. Xu, Z. Li, Z. Gao, J.-P. Zou, Appl. Catal. B, 2025, 362, 124721.
[54]	K. Wang, Y. Zhong, W. Dong, Y. Xiao, S. Ren, L. Li, Angew. Chem. Int. Ed., 2023, 62, e202304611.
[55]	Y. Lin, J. Zou, X. Wu, S. Tong, Q. Niu, S. He, S. Luo, C. Yang, Nano Lett., 2024, 24, 6302-6311.
[56]	Y. Chen, Y. Guo, T. Wang, S. Ji, H. Shao, M. Lin, S. Seki, N. Yan, D. Jiang, Nat. Commun., 2025, 16, 6495.
[57]	Y. Yang, J. Liu, M. Gu, B. Cheng, L. Wang, J. Yu, Appl. Catal. B, 2023, 333, 122780.
[58]	Y. Liu, W. Zhou, W. L. Teo, K. Wang, L. Zhang, Y. Zeng, Y. Zhao, Chem, 2020, 6, 3172-3202.
[59]	Q. Zhang, J. Zhou, H. Zhang, C. Qi, Q. Zhou, R. Guo, H. Yang, T. Xing, M. Wang, M. Wu, W. Wu, Adv. Funct. Mater., 2024, 34, 2401579.
[60]	Y. Luo, B. Zhang, C. Liu, D. Xia, X. Ou, Y. Cai, Y. Zhou, J. Jiang, B. Han, Angew. Chem. Int. Ed., 2023, 62, e202218456.
[61]	Z. Weng, Y. Lin, B. Han, X. Zhang, Q. Guo, Y. Luo, X. Ou, Y. Zhou, J. Jiang, J. Hazard. Mater., 2023, 448, 130869.
[62]	Q. Rong, X. Chen, Q. Cheng, Z. Huang, S. He, ACS Sustainable Chem. Eng., 2024, 12, 13306-13315.
[63]	Q. Xie, A. Chen, X. Li, C. Xu, S. Bi, W. Zhang, J. Tang, C. Pan, F. Zhang, G. Yu, Chem. Sci., 2025, 16, 2215-2221.
[64]	P. Dong, X. Xu, T. Wu, R. Luo, W. Kong, Z. Xu, S. Yuan, J. Zhou, J. Lei, Angew. Chem. Int. Ed., 2024, 63, e202405313.
[65]	X. Zhan, Y. Jin, C. Qu, H. Liu, R. Jiang, Q. Zhi, D. Qi, K. Wang, B. Han, H. Pan, J. Jiang, Adv. Funct. Mater., 2025, 35, 2415629.
[66]	T. Yang, D. Zhang, A. Kong, Y. Zou, L. Yuan, C. Liu, S. Luo, G. Wei, C. Yu, Angew. Chem. Int. Ed., 2024, 63, e202404077.

共价有机框架中氢键的构筑: 加速质子耦合电子转移以提升光催化合成过氧化氢性能

Designing hydrogen-bonds in covalent organic frameworks: accelerating proton-coupled electron transfer for enhanced photocatalytic H₂O₂ synthesis

RichHTML

PDF

Supporting Information

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

扫码分享

图/表 6

参考文献

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

[1]	张宝龙, 孙彬, 刘兴朋, 刘文宇, 顾少楠, 周国伟. 缺陷工程促进TiO₂/Zn_0.5Cd_0.5S S型异质结电荷转移实现高效光催化析氢[J]. 催化学报, 2026, 84(5): 117-129.
[2]	陈榕兴, 权永康, 蔡伟龙, 吴永豪, 黄剑莹, 赖跃坤. 氰氧共功能化氮化碳中的协同能带和电子工程用于高效光催化合成H₂O₂[J]. 催化学报, 2026, 84(5): 250-260.
[3]	陈杨林, 方瑞明, 赵慧博, 封敏君, 侯卫东, Tze Chien Sum, Wen Liu, 王亮, Lydia Helena Wong, 薛灿. 褐色聚合氮化碳纳米线双极光催化体系实现生物多元醇氧化与CO₂还原协同产CO[J]. 催化学报, 2026, 84(5): 214-225.
[4]	刘文宁, 安丽, 王金明, 李如玥, 牟洁, 龙永德, 曲丹, 刘弈畅, 胡宇翔, 汪夏燕, 蒋宁, 孙再成. 第三主族金属诱导的p-d轨道杂化提升Pd基金属烯在锌空气电池中的氧还原性能[J]. 催化学报, 2026, 84(5): 144-158.
[5]	韩怡雯, 刘润雨, 张雨昕, 叶磊, Phuc T. T. Nguyen, 龚天军, 吕学斌, 傅尧, 颜宁. 单原子锚定的中空纳米反应器中构建内建电场以实现高效塑料光热重整[J]. 催化学报, 2026, 84(5): 301-313.
[6]	刘梦梦, 张妍, 谢禹成, 潘广学, 操海群, 叶盛. TiO₂相结工程促进吡虫啉杀虫剂的界面吸附和催化[J]. 催化学报, 2026, 84(5): 359-367.
[7]	吴静尧, 吕昱静, 赵强, 王朔, 汪颖, 温娜, 丁正新, 张子重, 龙金林. 共价有机框架的电子-质子双重奏: 高效催化氧气直接还原生成过氧化氢[J]. 催化学报, 2026, 84(5): 288-300.
[8]	张勇, 朱文君, 赵艳艳, 张淑敏. 用于高效光催化产H₂O₂的S型In₂S₃/HOF异质结[J]. 催化学报, 2026, 84(5): 261-273.
[9]	谢可慧, 刘从学, 耿琰, 阚京兰, 王广博, 董育斌. 苯并三噻吩基共价有机框架连接结构调控实现高效光合成H₂O₂[J]. 催化学报, 2026, 83(4): 271-281.
[10]	谢文奥, 贾治芳, 舒畅, 王婷霞, 席建红, 蔡佳轩, 宋向阳, 车瑜, 王笑颜, 王科伟, 谭必恩. 氰基功能化的共价有机框架通过微环境调节增强光催化性能制备过氧化氢[J]. 催化学报, 2026, 83(4): 282-293.
[11]	R. Kavitha, C. Manjunatha, S. Girish Kumar. 基于氧化锌的S型异质结: 设计原理、制备方法及光催化活性[J]. 催化学报, 2026, 83(4): 54-95.
[12]	李思娴, 段有雨, 梁新元, 李宇涵, 张蝶青. 光催化活性位点的原子结构解析与调控: 从精准识别到理性设计[J]. 催化学报, 2026, 83(4): 1-23.
[13]	庄玉娟, 陈庆军, 林兴恩, 孟令伟, 胡富望, 余新涛, Geoffrey I. N. Waterhouse, 彭立山. 通过Fe-N-C层介导的5d-3d/2p耦合增强Pt/C催化剂在质子交换膜燃料电池中氧还原反应的稳定性研究[J]. 催化学报, 2026, 83(4): 308-318.
[14]	唐克山, 邓莞沂, 王宁远, 夏阳, 吴新鹤, 杨恒. 富含氧空位的三嗪基-COF/TiO₂ S-型异质结用于高效光催化CO₂还原[J]. 催化学报, 2026, 83(4): 244-257.
[15]	许凯强, 朱文君, Mahmoud Sayed, 韩生. 一维S型光催化剂的设计与制备[J]. 催化学报, 2026, 83(4): 24-53.

共价有机框架中氢键的构筑: 加速质子耦合电子转移以提升光催化合成过氧化氢性能

Designing hydrogen-bonds in covalent organic frameworks: accelerating proton-coupled electron transfer for enhanced photocatalytic H2O2 synthesis

RichHTML

PDF

Supporting Information

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

扫码分享

图/表 6

参考文献

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

Designing hydrogen-bonds in covalent organic frameworks: accelerating proton-coupled electron transfer for enhanced photocatalytic H₂O₂ synthesis