Chinese Journal of Catalysis ›› 2026, Vol. 83: 24-53.DOI: 10.1016/S1872-2067(26)64988-1
• Reviews • Previous Articles Next Articles
Kaiqiang Xua, Wenjun Zhub, Mahmoud Sayedc,*(
), Sheng Hana,*(
)
Received:2025-09-08
Accepted:2025-10-15
Online:2026-04-18
Published:2026-03-04
Contact:
Mahmoud Sayed, Sheng Han
About author:Mahmoud Sayed received his B.S. (2012), M.S. (2017) in Chemistry from Fayoum University, Egypt, and PhD (2021) from Wuhan University of Technology, China, under supervision of Prof. Jiaguo Yu. Currently, He is a postdoctoral fellow at Prof. Jiaguo Yu’ group at laboratory of solar fuel, China university of geosciences, Wuhan, China. His research interest focuses on the design and integration of photocatalytic materials in energy conversion and environmental applications.Supported by:Kaiqiang Xu, Wenjun Zhu, Mahmoud Sayed, Sheng Han. Design and preparation of 1D-based S-scheme photocatalysts[J]. Chinese Journal of Catalysis, 2026, 83: 24-53.
Add to citation manager EndNote|Ris|BibTeX
URL: https://www.cjcatal.com/EN/10.1016/S1872-2067(26)64988-1
Fig. 1. (a) A schematic illustration of different photophysical actions that happened when incident impinges a photocatalyst: (I) formation of charge carriers by light; (II) electron and holes recombination in bulk; (III) electron and hole recombination at the surface; (IV) consumption of separated electrons and holes in the surface reactions. (b) A schematic diagram of the thermodynamic limitations in photocatalytic reactions.
Fig. 3. Thermodynamic challenges for the liquid-phase Z-scheme mechanism. (a) Proposed mechanism of electron transfer in a liquid-phase Z-scheme system. (b) Thermodynamically more favorable charge-carrier-transfer route.
Fig. 4. Thermodynamic challenges for all-solid-state Z-scheme mechanisms. Proposed electron-transfer route in according to all-solid-state Z-scheme configuration (a) and a thermodynamically more reasonable electron-transfer route (b).
| 1D nanostructure | Advantage | Challenge |
|---|---|---|
| Nanorods | controlled facet exposure, short radial diffusion, good robustness, easier alignment | light absorption depth limits, recombination in core, lower accessible surface area, limited internal functionalization |
| Nanowires | very high surface-to-volume ratio, efficient axial charge transport, good light scattering and waveguiding, stable integration | synthesis control difficulty, surface defects, shading issues, fragility |
| Nanotubes | inner and outer surfaces, short radial thickness, dual-surface functionalization, vertical arrays possible, enhanced light absorption | mechanical collapse, synthesis complexity, mass transport limitations, inner surface traps, shading |
| Nanofibers | high surface area (especially porous), continuous carrier pathways, scalable/easy production (electrospinning), flexibility, good adsorption/diffusion | lower crystallinity, large diameter recombination, random orientation, complex structuring, shading in mats |
| Nanoribbons | tunable edge states and bandgap, large exposed surfaces, good in-plane conduction, integration in hybrid structures, quantum effects | synthesis precision and defect control, edge traps, mechanical fragility, weak absorption if too thin, width diffusion limits |
Table 1 Advantages and challenges of typical 1D nanostructures for S-scheme heterojunction.
| 1D nanostructure | Advantage | Challenge |
|---|---|---|
| Nanorods | controlled facet exposure, short radial diffusion, good robustness, easier alignment | light absorption depth limits, recombination in core, lower accessible surface area, limited internal functionalization |
| Nanowires | very high surface-to-volume ratio, efficient axial charge transport, good light scattering and waveguiding, stable integration | synthesis control difficulty, surface defects, shading issues, fragility |
| Nanotubes | inner and outer surfaces, short radial thickness, dual-surface functionalization, vertical arrays possible, enhanced light absorption | mechanical collapse, synthesis complexity, mass transport limitations, inner surface traps, shading |
| Nanofibers | high surface area (especially porous), continuous carrier pathways, scalable/easy production (electrospinning), flexibility, good adsorption/diffusion | lower crystallinity, large diameter recombination, random orientation, complex structuring, shading in mats |
| Nanoribbons | tunable edge states and bandgap, large exposed surfaces, good in-plane conduction, integration in hybrid structures, quantum effects | synthesis precision and defect control, edge traps, mechanical fragility, weak absorption if too thin, width diffusion limits |
| Photocatalyst | Dimensional structure | Synthesis condition | Application | Ref. |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ZnIn2S4/ZnO | 0D/1D | chemical bath deposition | H2O2 evolution | [ |
| CeO2/ZnO | 0D/1D | solvothermal | CO2 photoreduction | [ |
| Bi2S3/TiO2 | 0D/1D | hydrothermal | CO2 photoreduction | [ |
| Mn0.3Cd0.7S/CuWO4 | 0D/1D | calcination | tetracycline (TC) degradation and H2 evolution | [ |
| BiSI/Ag2S | 0D/1D | precipitation | Cr(VI) removal | [ |
| CuBi2O4/CoO | 0D/1D | solvothermal | TC degradation | [ |
| Cu2O/W18O49 | 0D/1D | wet impregnation | CO2 photoreduction | [ |
| Bi2Sn2O7/Bi4O5I2 | 0D/1D | solvothermal | BPA degradation | [ |
| ZnO/SnIn4S8 | 1D/2D | solvothermal | H2 evolution | [ |
| TiO2/CaIn2S4 | 1D/2D | solvothermal | H2 evolution | [ |
| Co3O4/BiVO4 | 1D/2D | calcination | H2 evolution and N2 photoreduction | [ |
| W18O49/g-C3N4 | 1D/2D | solvothermal | N2 fixation | [ |
| Mo-WO3/In-C3N4 | 1D/2D | calcination | H2O2 evolution | [ |
| CoTiO3/g‐C3N4 | 1D/2D | calcination | CO2 photoreduction | [ |
| Bi2S3/g-C3N4 | 1D/2D | calcination | TC degradation | [ |
| K6Nb10.8O30/Zn2In2S5 | 1D/2D | solvothermal | H2 evolution | [ |
| Sb2S3/Sv-ZnIn2S4 | 1D/2D | oil bath | H2 evolution | [ |
Table 2 Summary of 1D-based S-scheme photocatalysts synthesized by in situ growth methods.
| Photocatalyst | Dimensional structure | Synthesis condition | Application | Ref. |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ZnIn2S4/ZnO | 0D/1D | chemical bath deposition | H2O2 evolution | [ |
| CeO2/ZnO | 0D/1D | solvothermal | CO2 photoreduction | [ |
| Bi2S3/TiO2 | 0D/1D | hydrothermal | CO2 photoreduction | [ |
| Mn0.3Cd0.7S/CuWO4 | 0D/1D | calcination | tetracycline (TC) degradation and H2 evolution | [ |
| BiSI/Ag2S | 0D/1D | precipitation | Cr(VI) removal | [ |
| CuBi2O4/CoO | 0D/1D | solvothermal | TC degradation | [ |
| Cu2O/W18O49 | 0D/1D | wet impregnation | CO2 photoreduction | [ |
| Bi2Sn2O7/Bi4O5I2 | 0D/1D | solvothermal | BPA degradation | [ |
| ZnO/SnIn4S8 | 1D/2D | solvothermal | H2 evolution | [ |
| TiO2/CaIn2S4 | 1D/2D | solvothermal | H2 evolution | [ |
| Co3O4/BiVO4 | 1D/2D | calcination | H2 evolution and N2 photoreduction | [ |
| W18O49/g-C3N4 | 1D/2D | solvothermal | N2 fixation | [ |
| Mo-WO3/In-C3N4 | 1D/2D | calcination | H2O2 evolution | [ |
| CoTiO3/g‐C3N4 | 1D/2D | calcination | CO2 photoreduction | [ |
| Bi2S3/g-C3N4 | 1D/2D | calcination | TC degradation | [ |
| K6Nb10.8O30/Zn2In2S5 | 1D/2D | solvothermal | H2 evolution | [ |
| Sb2S3/Sv-ZnIn2S4 | 1D/2D | oil bath | H2 evolution | [ |
Fig. 6. (a) Schematic illustration of the synthesis process for SS and AS series photocatalysts. (b) TEM image of SS NTs (inset: HRTEM image). TEM image (c), and HRTEM image (d) of 10 AS. (e) HAADF image and EDS mapping of 10 AS. Reprinted with permission from Ref. [86]. Copyright 2022, Elsevier.
Fig. 7. (a) Illustration of the formation route of H-W18O49 NW/MIL-125(Ti) NS S-scheme heterostructures. SEM images (b, c), TEM (d) and HRTEM (e) images of H-W18O49 NW/MIL-125(Ti) NS. STEM image (f) and corresponding W (g), O (h), Ti (i), and C (j) element mappings of H-W18O49 NW/MIL-125(Ti) NS. Reprinted with permission from Ref. [110]. Copyright 2022, Elsevier.
Fig. 8. Morphology and structure of TiO2/CsPbBr3 heterojunction. (a?c) TEM, STEM, and HRTEM images of TC2. (d) EDX spectrum of TC2. (e) HAADF image and EDX elemental mappings of Ti, O, Cs, Pb, and Br elements in TC2. Reprinted with permission from Ref. [111]. Copyright 2020, Nature publication group.
Fig. 9. (a) Schematic illustration of the XPS working principle. (b) Illustration of ISIXPS measurements. Reprinted with permission from Ref. [36]. Copyright 2025, Royal Society of Chemistry. High-resolution XPS spectra of Ti 2p (c) and Bi 4f (d). (e) Schematic diagram of S-scheme charge transfer within the TiO2/Ce2S3 heterojunction. Reprinted with permission from Ref. [90]. Copyright 2024, Elsevier.
Fig. 10. Schematic illustration of the KPFM working principle before (a) and after (b) electrical contact. (c) AFM image of CdS-PT composite. Corresponding surface potential distribution of CdS-PT in darkness (d) and under light irradiation (e). (f) Line-scanning surface potential from point A to B. (g) The schematic illustration of photoirradiation KPFM. Reprinted with permission from Ref. [139]. Copyright 2021, Wiley-VCH.
Fig. 11. (a) Schematic illustrations of the work principles of fs-TA spectroscopy. Reprinted with permission from Ref. [134]. Copyright 2024, American Chemical Society. (b) TEM image of CdS/PDB S-scheme photocatalyst. 2D mapping TA spectra of CdS (c) and CdS/PDB (d). TA spectra signal of CdS (e) and CdS/PDB (f). (g) Illustration of the energy barrier between the HOMO of PDB and CBM of CdS. Normalized decay kinetic curves of CdS (h) and CdS/PDB (i). (j) Decay pathways of photogenerated electrons in CdS/PDB. Reprinted with permission from Ref. [130]. Copyright 2023, Wiley-VCH.
| Dimensional structure | S-scheme heterojunction | Application | Efficiency | Ref. |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0D/1D | TiO2/Bi2S3 | CO2 photoreduction | CH4 yield = 7.7 μmol·h-1 | [ |
| 0D/1D | Sn-doped TiO2/Bi2S3 | CO2 photoreduction | CH3OH yield = 529 μmol·g-1·h-1 | [ |
| 0D/1D | In2O3/In2S3 | TC degradation | degradation = 83% (60 min) | [ |
| 0D/1D | In2O3/Co2VO4 | CO2 photoreduction | CO and CH4 yields = 15.8 and 22.9 μmol·g-1, respectively | [ |
| 0D/1D | Ta2O5/Ag2S | CO2 photoreduction | CH4 yield = 132.3 μmol·g-1 | [ |
| 0D/1D | CoO/CuBi2O4 | TC degradation | degradation = 89.5% (90 min) | [ |
| 0D/1D | W18O49/Cu2O | CO2 photoreduction | HCOOH yield = 56.42 μmol·g-1·h-1 | [ |
| 0D/1D | AgVO3/CaIn2S4 | tetracycline hydrochloride (TCH) degradation | degradation = 94.1% (80 min) | [ |
| 0D/1D | Bi4O5I2/Bi2Sn2O7 | Bisphenol A (BPA) degradation | BPA complete degraded within 20 min | [ |
| 0D/1D | CdS/NiO | H2 evolution | evolution rate = 7.9 mmol·g-1·h-1 | [ |
| 0D/1D | Bi-MOF/ZnFe2O4 | TC degradation | degradation = 87.4% (60 min) | [ |
| 0D/1D | iCOF/B2O3 | H2O2 evolution | evolution rate = 9.76 mmol·g-1·h-1 | [ |
| 1D/2D | TiO2/BiOBr | Rhodamine B (RhB) degradation | degradation = 98.4% (8 min) | [ |
| 1D/2D | TiO2/Bi2O2CO3 | TC degradation | degradation = 86% (60 min) | [ |
| 1D/2D | TiO2/CaIn2S4 | H2 evolution | evolution rate = 564.7 μmol·g-1·h-1 | [ |
| 1D/2D | ZnO/SnIn4S8 | H2 evolution | evolution rate = 1374.4 μmol·g-1·h-1 | [ |
| 1D/2D | ZnO/CTF | H2O2 evolution | evolution rate = 12000 μmol·g-1·h-1 | [ |
| 1D/2D | Nb2O5/NiO | H2O2 evolution | evolution rate = 0.48 mmol·g-1 | [ |
| 1D/2D | WO3/Zn0.5Cd0.5S | H2 evolution | evolution rate = 715 μmol·g-1·h-1 | [ |
| 1D/2D | H-W18O49/MIL-125(Ti) | CO2 photoreduction | CO yield = 202.37μmol·g-1·h-1 | [ |
| 1D/2D | FeCo2O4/g-C3N4 | H2 evolution | evolution rate = 6303.5 μmol·g-1·h-1 | [ |
| 1D/2D | Bi8(CrO4)O11/g-C3N5 | RhB and TCH degradation | degradation = 94.5% and 93.3% for RhB and TCH within 60min, respectively | [ |
| 1D/2D | Bi2S3/Bi3TiNbO9 | H2O2 evolution | evolution rate = 810 μmol·g-1·h-1 | [ |
| 1D/2D | Sb2S3/ZnIn2S4 | N2 fixation | NH3 yield of 15.96 ± 0.97 mg·L-1 (40 min) | [ |
| 1D/2D | g-C3N4/ZnIn2S4 | U(VI) reduction | U(VI) reduction = 97.4% (22 min) | [ |
Table 3 Recently reported 1D-based S-scheme photocatalysts for different applications.
| Dimensional structure | S-scheme heterojunction | Application | Efficiency | Ref. |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0D/1D | TiO2/Bi2S3 | CO2 photoreduction | CH4 yield = 7.7 μmol·h-1 | [ |
| 0D/1D | Sn-doped TiO2/Bi2S3 | CO2 photoreduction | CH3OH yield = 529 μmol·g-1·h-1 | [ |
| 0D/1D | In2O3/In2S3 | TC degradation | degradation = 83% (60 min) | [ |
| 0D/1D | In2O3/Co2VO4 | CO2 photoreduction | CO and CH4 yields = 15.8 and 22.9 μmol·g-1, respectively | [ |
| 0D/1D | Ta2O5/Ag2S | CO2 photoreduction | CH4 yield = 132.3 μmol·g-1 | [ |
| 0D/1D | CoO/CuBi2O4 | TC degradation | degradation = 89.5% (90 min) | [ |
| 0D/1D | W18O49/Cu2O | CO2 photoreduction | HCOOH yield = 56.42 μmol·g-1·h-1 | [ |
| 0D/1D | AgVO3/CaIn2S4 | tetracycline hydrochloride (TCH) degradation | degradation = 94.1% (80 min) | [ |
| 0D/1D | Bi4O5I2/Bi2Sn2O7 | Bisphenol A (BPA) degradation | BPA complete degraded within 20 min | [ |
| 0D/1D | CdS/NiO | H2 evolution | evolution rate = 7.9 mmol·g-1·h-1 | [ |
| 0D/1D | Bi-MOF/ZnFe2O4 | TC degradation | degradation = 87.4% (60 min) | [ |
| 0D/1D | iCOF/B2O3 | H2O2 evolution | evolution rate = 9.76 mmol·g-1·h-1 | [ |
| 1D/2D | TiO2/BiOBr | Rhodamine B (RhB) degradation | degradation = 98.4% (8 min) | [ |
| 1D/2D | TiO2/Bi2O2CO3 | TC degradation | degradation = 86% (60 min) | [ |
| 1D/2D | TiO2/CaIn2S4 | H2 evolution | evolution rate = 564.7 μmol·g-1·h-1 | [ |
| 1D/2D | ZnO/SnIn4S8 | H2 evolution | evolution rate = 1374.4 μmol·g-1·h-1 | [ |
| 1D/2D | ZnO/CTF | H2O2 evolution | evolution rate = 12000 μmol·g-1·h-1 | [ |
| 1D/2D | Nb2O5/NiO | H2O2 evolution | evolution rate = 0.48 mmol·g-1 | [ |
| 1D/2D | WO3/Zn0.5Cd0.5S | H2 evolution | evolution rate = 715 μmol·g-1·h-1 | [ |
| 1D/2D | H-W18O49/MIL-125(Ti) | CO2 photoreduction | CO yield = 202.37μmol·g-1·h-1 | [ |
| 1D/2D | FeCo2O4/g-C3N4 | H2 evolution | evolution rate = 6303.5 μmol·g-1·h-1 | [ |
| 1D/2D | Bi8(CrO4)O11/g-C3N5 | RhB and TCH degradation | degradation = 94.5% and 93.3% for RhB and TCH within 60min, respectively | [ |
| 1D/2D | Bi2S3/Bi3TiNbO9 | H2O2 evolution | evolution rate = 810 μmol·g-1·h-1 | [ |
| 1D/2D | Sb2S3/ZnIn2S4 | N2 fixation | NH3 yield of 15.96 ± 0.97 mg·L-1 (40 min) | [ |
| 1D/2D | g-C3N4/ZnIn2S4 | U(VI) reduction | U(VI) reduction = 97.4% (22 min) | [ |
Fig. 13. Insights into the charge separation within the S-scheme heterojunction. (a) Schematic illustration of the TiO2/Ce2S3 S-scheme heterojunction under UV light irradiation for photocatalytic nitrobenzene hydrogenation. The pseudocolor plots and transient absorption spectra recorded at indicated delay times measured with 350 nm excitation: pure TiO2 nanofibers (b,c) and TiO2/Ce2S3 nanohybrids (TC5) (d,e). (f) Corresponding transient absorption kinetic traces of TiO2 and TC5 at 645 nm within 100 ps. (g) Schematic diagram of S-scheme charge transfer within the TiO2/Ce2S3 heterojunction. Reprinted with permission from Ref. [175]. Copyright 2022, American Chemical Society.
Fig. 14. SEM images of ZnO (a) and ZZS-20 (b) nanofibers. (c) TEM images of ZZS-20. (d) HRTEM images of ZZS-20. (e) HAADF image and EDX elemental mappings of Zn, O, In, and S elements in ZZS-20. Calculated electrostatic potentials of ZnO (f) and ZnIn2S4 (g). (h) Charge density difference of ZnO/ZnIn2S4 (the yellow region signifies the accumulation layer of electrons and the cyan region is the electron depletion layer). (i) Electron transfer mechanism of ZnO/ZnIn2S4 S-scheme heterojunction. (j) Photocatalytic H2O2 evolution performance of different photocatalysts. (k) Stability cycle test of H2O2 production by ZZS-20. Reprinted with permission from Ref. [88]. Copyright 2023, Elsevier.
Fig. 15. (a) Preparation route of p-CNQDs/VO-ZnO composite. (b) EPR spectra of ZnO, g-C3N4/VO-ZnO, and p-CNQDs/VO-ZnO. (c) UV-vis DRS of ZnO, p-CNQDs, and p-CNQDs/VO-ZnO composites. (d) ΔGH* values of g-C3N4/VO-ZnO and p-CNQDs/VO-ZnO. Reprinted with permission from Ref. [183]. Copyright 2022, Elsevier.
Fig. 16. (a) Schematic illustration for synthesis of Cu2O/W18O49 heterojunction. (b) XRD patterns of W18O49, 20% Cu:W, 40% Cu:W, 60% Cu:W, 80% Cu:W and the corresponding amplified XRD pattern (right). SEM images of W18O49 (c) and Cu2O/W18O49 (d). (e) HRTEM image of W18O49. TEM (f) and HRTEM (g) images of Cu2O/W18O49. (h) Photocatalytic CO2 reduction performance over Cu2O/W18O49 heterojunction with different composition. (i) Comparison with the contrast samples. Reprinted with permission from Ref. [94]. Copyright 2025, Elsevier.
Fig. 17. (a) Schematic Illustration of assembly fiber heterojunction photocatalysts. TEM image (b) and HRTEM image (c) of AFSP heterojunction. 2D transient absorption surface plots of Ta2O5 (d) and ASTO-2 (g). Transient absorption signals of Ta2O5 (e) and ASTO-2 (h). The decay signals of Ta2O5 and ASTO-2 monitored at 460 nm (f) and 500 nm (i) (inset of schematic diagram of charge transfer within the ASTO heterojunction). Reprinted with permission from Ref. [153]. Copyright 2023, Wiley‐VCH.
Fig. 18. In-situ irradiation XPS spectra of Ni 2p (a), O 1s (b), Cd 3d (c), and S 2p (d) in 15%NiO/CdS. KFPM images under darkness condition (e) and visible-light irradiation condition (f). (g) Surface photovoltage distribution under dark and visible-light irradiation of 15%NiO/CdS. (h) IEF formation and electron transfer of NiO/CdS. Reprinted with permission from Ref. [155]. Copyright 2024, Elsevier.
Fig. 19. (a) Photocatalytic H2-production plots. (b) Photocatalytic H2-production rate of different samples. (c) Cycling stability of the MCS/W-6. (d) UV-vis DRS spectrum and AQY of the MCS/W-6 photocatalyst at 380, 450, 500 and 550 nm. (e) Schematic diagram of the S-scheme charge-transfer mechanism in the MCS/W heterojunction system. Reprinted with permission from Ref. [194]. Copyright 2022, Elsevier.
Fig. 20. TEM (a,b) and HRTEM (c) images of the CPB/AgBr heterojunction. (d) EDX elemental mappings of Cs, Pb, Br and Ag elements in the CPB/AgBr heterojunction. ESR spectra of DMPO-⋅OH (e) and DMPO-⋅O2− (f) in the presence of CsPbBr3 NCs, AgBr and the CPB/AgBr heterojunction. (g) CO and CH4 evolution over CsPbBr3 NCs, AgBr and the CPB/AgBr heterojunctions after 4 h of photocatalytic reaction. (h) Recycling tests with four 4 h cycles. Reprinted with permission from Ref. [195]. Copyright 2022, Elsevier.
Fig. 21. (a) HRTEM and HAADF images of MAPB-TCOF. (b) Mapping images of C, N, Pb, and Br elements in MAPB-T-COF. EPR spectra of ·O2- in the presence of T-COF (c), MAPB (d), and MAPB-T-COF (e) under different conditions. (f) Signal comparison of ·O2- on MAPB-T-COF, T-COF, and MAPB under light illumination. (g) Signal comparison of ·O2- on MAPB-T-COF, T-COF, and MAPB with the addition of 4-MBT with blue LED illumination. (h) EPR spectra of ·O2- in the presence of MAPB-TCOF with various thiophenols. Reprinted with permission from Ref. [197]. Copyright 2023, American Chemical Society.
Fig. 22. Scheme illustration for the synthesis of Bi3TiNbO9/Bi2S3 heterojunction (a) and TEM (b) and SAED (c) images of the Bi3TiNbO9/Bi2S3. (d) Atomic-level HRTEM image of the Bi3TiNbO9 of dashed box area in (b). (e,f) TEM image of pristine Bi2S3 and its HAADF-STEM image of dashed box area in (e). (g,h) The corresponding lattice distances of the Bi3TiNbO9 and Bi2S3 in (d) and (f), respectively. (i) Photocatalytic performances of Bi3TiNbO9, Bi2S3, Bi3TiNbO9+Bi2S3, and Bi3TiNbO9/Bi2S3 heterojunction under simulated sunlight. (j) Schematic illustration of energy band arrangement of Bi3TiNbO9/Bi2S3 heterojunction upon illumination. (k) Photocatalytic H2O2 evolution performance of the Bi3TiNbO9/Bi2S3 with continuous 13 cycles (1 h foreach cycle) under simulated sunlight. Reprinted with permission from Ref. [164]. Copyright 2024, Wiley‐VCH.
Fig. 23. (a) Schematic diagram for the preparation of WO3?x/In2S3 heterostructures. (b) FESEM images of WO3?x nanofibers at different magnifications. (c) FESEM, (d?f) HRTEM images of WO3?x/In2S3 hybrid nanofibers. (g) HAADF image and EDX elemental mappings of W, O, In and S elements in WO3?x/In2S3 nanostructures. Gibbs free energy diagram of: CO2 photoreduction over In2S3 (002) surface (h) and H2O photooxidation over WO3?x (001) surface (i). Reprinted with permission from Ref. [208]. Copyright 2024, Wiley-VCH.
|
| [1] | Ziyi Liao, Lan Jiang, Yang Yang, Lin Wang, Weiyou Yang, Huilin Hou. Alkali-cyano dual-tailored g-C3N4/BiOCl S-scheme heterojunctions for highly efficient visible-light-driven H2O2 photosynthesis in pure water [J]. Chinese Journal of Catalysis, 2026, 83(4): 143-161. |
| [2] | Peng Liu, Lian Duan, Baopeng Yang, Mingwei Sun, Gen Chen, Xiaohe Liu, Min Liu, Ning Zhang. Tuning surface electronic structure of (CuGa)xZn1‒2xGa2S4 photocatalyst for efficient nitrate-to-ammonia conversion [J]. Chinese Journal of Catalysis, 2026, 83(4): 172-182. |
| [3] | Yixin Li, Jianhao Qiu, Guanglu Xia, Qiying Liu, Biyao Fang, Meng Liu, Chen Chen, Jianfeng Yao. Hollow tubular In2O3 modified carbon nitride for photocatalytic high-yield cleavage of lignin C-C bonds under 395 nm light [J]. Chinese Journal of Catalysis, 2026, 83(4): 209-218. |
| [4] | Jinhe Li, Xiaxi Yao, Xiaohui Yu, Xiaosong Zhou, Wei Ren, Lele Wang, Weikang Wang, Qinqin Liu. Simultaneous value-added utilization of photogenerated electrons and holes via plasmon-exciton-phonon synergy in Mo2N QDs/ZnIn2S4 heterojunction [J]. Chinese Journal of Catalysis, 2026, 83(4): 219-230. |
| [5] | R. Kavitha, C. Manjunatha, S. Girish Kumar. ZnO-based S-scheme heterojunction: Design principles, preparation methods and photocatalytic activity [J]. Chinese Journal of Catalysis, 2026, 83(4): 54-95. |
| [6] | Sixian Li, Youyu Duan, Xinyuan Liang, Yuhan Li, Dieqing Zhang. Decoding the atomic architecture of photocatalytic active sites: From precise identification to rational design principles [J]. Chinese Journal of Catalysis, 2026, 83(4): 1-23. |
| [7] | Keshan Tang, Wanyi Deng, Ningyuan Wang, Yang Xia, Xinhe Wu, Heng Yang. Triazine-based COF/TiO2 S-scheme heterojunction with oxygen vacancies for efficient photocatalytic CO2 reduction [J]. Chinese Journal of Catalysis, 2026, 83(4): 244-257. |
| [8] | Ke-Hui Xie, Cong-Xue Liu, Yan Geng, Jing-Lan Kan, Guang-Bo Wang, Yu-Bin Dong. Efficient H2O2 photosynthesis through linker engineering of benzotrithiophene-based covalent organic frameworks [J]. Chinese Journal of Catalysis, 2026, 83(4): 271-281. |
| [9] | Haonan Li, Wa Gao, Kangli Ma, Jian Lei, Olim Ruzimuradov, Akhtam Samiev, Ya Chen, Jingxiang Low, Yue Li. Interfacial Ni-N bond in g-C3N4/CoNi2S4 for enhanced photocatalytic CO2 conversion [J]. Chinese Journal of Catalysis, 2026, 82(3): 266-277. |
| [10] | Wanggang Zhang, Haochen Xie, Hongliang Wang, Rufeng Tian, Lei Liu, Jian Wang, Yiming Liu. Atomic-level lattice matching in hexagonal WO3/TiO2 S-scheme heterojunctions for high-efficiency selective photoelectrocatalytic glycerol-to-dihydroxyacetone conversion [J]. Chinese Journal of Catalysis, 2026, 82(3): 161-173. |
| [11] | Chunyuan Chen, Zhongliao Wang, Ying Ma, Bo Weng, Shifu Chen, Sugang Meng. Synergistic effect of S-doping and nitrogen-vacancy engineering on 2D/3D S-scheme photocatalyst for efficient photosynthesis of H2O2 [J]. Chinese Journal of Catalysis, 2026, 82(3): 278-291. |
| [12] | Congcong Wang, Yongkang Quan, Suili Shi, Guorong Wang, Zhiliang Jin. Self-assembling 3D/2D ZnIn2S4/CN-NH4 to construct S-scheme heterojunctions for the efficient production of H2O2 in pure water [J]. Chinese Journal of Catalysis, 2026, 81(2): 259-271. |
| [13] | Zhe Zhang, Guixu Pan, Wei Zhu, Keyu Zhang, Guijie Liang, Shihan Wang, Ning Wang, Yan Xing, Yunfeng Li. Multi-intermolecular forces strengthen interfacial carrier mobility in poly (barbituric acid) all-organic heterojunction systems for efficient solar-to-hydrogen conversion [J]. Chinese Journal of Catalysis, 2026, 81(2): 284-298. |
| [14] | Xiong Wang, Chao Peng, Yongkang Xiao, Ziye Zhang, Huiping Zheng, Wenjie Yue, Sheng Tian, Xingsheng Hu, Weifan Shao, Guanghui Chen, Binghao Wang, Huijuan Wang, Mingming Yin, Jinxin Li, Yang Li, Lang Chen, Shuangfeng Yin. Surface engineering enhancing activity and stability of Bi2WO6-x for selective C-H bond photooxidation [J]. Chinese Journal of Catalysis, 2026, 81(2): 246-258. |
| [15] | Na Tian, Chaofan Yuan, Tong Zhou, Wenying Yu, Yinghui Wang, Na Zhang, Yihe Zhang, Hongwei Huang. Defect-coordinated Au nanoparticles in carbon nitride for efficient piezo-photocatalytic hydrogen peroxide production [J]. Chinese Journal of Catalysis, 2026, 81(2): 272-283. |
| Viewed | ||||||
|
Full text |
|
|||||
|
Abstract |
|
|||||