可用于高效光催化制氢的Ni-P团簇改性氮化碳材料

doi:10.1016/S1872-2067(19)63343-7

催化学报 ›› 2019, Vol. 40 ›› Issue (6): 867-874.DOI: 10.1016/S1872-2067(19)63343-7

可用于高效光催化制氢的Ni-P团簇改性氮化碳材料

王雅婕, 李瑶, 曹少文, 余家国

武汉理工大学材料复合新技术国家重点实验室, 湖北武汉 430070

收稿日期:2019-01-24 修回日期:2019-03-08 出版日期:2019-06-18 发布日期:2019-04-26
通讯作者: 曹少文, 余家国
基金资助:
国家自然科学基金（21773179，U1705251，21433007）；湖北省自然科学基金（2017CFA031）；武汉理工大学研究生优秀学位论文培育项目（2016-YS-001）.

Ni-P cluster modified carbon nitride toward efficient photocatalytic hydrogen production

Yajie Wang, Yao Li, Shaowen Cao, Jiaguo Yu

State Key Laboratory of Advanced Technology for Materials Synthesis and Processing, Wuhan University of Technology, Wuhan 430070, Hubei, China

Received:2019-01-24 Revised:2019-03-08 Online:2019-06-18 Published:2019-04-26
Contact: S1872-2067(19)63343-7
Supported by:
This work is supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (21773179, U1705251 and 21433007), the Natural Science Foundation of Hubei Province of China (2017CFA031), and the Excellent Dissertation Cultivation Funds of Wuhan University of Technology (2016-YS-001).

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

在过去的几十年里，化石能源的过度消耗导致了全球能源短缺和环境污染，这严重制约着人类社会发展.因此，寻找一种清洁的可再生的能源成为了人们亟待解决的问题.太阳能是地球上最丰富的能源，通过半导体光催化技术把太阳能转化为清洁的氢能是解决能源危机和缓解环境污染最有效的方法之一.石墨相氮化碳（CN）具有合适的能带结构、良好的稳定性、无毒性，且合成方法简单、成本低廉，因而被视为是一种非常有潜力的半导体光催化剂.然而，由于CN在光催化反应过程中光生电子与空穴极易发生复合，严重影响了电子从体相到外表面的转移过程以及随后的光催化质子还原反应，使得CN光催化制氢效率不高.通过负载助催化剂可以有效地促进光生电子和空穴的分离.但是现有的高效助催化剂一般为贵金属，如Pt，Pd和Au等，成本较高，不利于实际应用.因此，寻找高效、稳定且廉价的助催化剂成为光催化领域的挑战之一.本文通过化学镀的方法将Ni-P合金团簇锚定在CN表面，并通过X射线衍射（XRD）、傅里叶变换红外光谱（FTIR）、场发射扫描电子显微镜（FESEM）、透射电子显微镜（TEM）、紫外-可见漫反射光谱（UV-vis DRS）、X射线光电子能谱（XPS）、稳态荧光光谱（PL）、时间分辨荧光光谱（TRPL）、光电化学测试和光催化制氢测试等方法研究了负载Ni-P助催化剂对CN晶体结构、化学组成、微观形貌、吸光能力、电荷转移以及光催化性能的影响.
XRD，FTIR，FESEM和TEM的结果显示，Ni-P均匀紧密地与CN结合在一起.UV-vis DRS测试表明，负载Ni-P提高了材料体系的光吸收能力.XPS结果表明，在复合光催化剂中电子从CN转移到了Ni-P助催化剂上，表明光催化剂和助催化剂之间强的界面相互作用.PL，TRPL和光电化学测试结果表明，与普通CN相比，负载了Ni-P的CN有更小的荧光强度、更短的荧光寿命和更小的电荷转移电阻.这说明负载Ni-P助催化剂提高了CN的电荷转移效率，抑制了光生电子和空穴的复合.因此在光催化制氢反应中，复合光催化剂的氢气产率可高达1506μmol h^-1 g^-1，可以与负载贵金属Pt助催化剂的CN相媲美，并且在9h的循环试验中，产氢性能没有明显下降.综上所述，Ni-P合金团簇在光催化质子还原反应中有望作为贵金属助催化剂的高效、稳定且廉价的替代品.

关键词: 光催化, 制氢, 助催化剂, Ni-P合金, 电荷转移

Abstract:

Exploring low-cost cocatalyst to take over noble metal cocatalyst is still challenging in the field of photocatalytic proton reduction. Herein, Ni-P alloy clusters are anchored onto the surface of polymeric carbon nitride through a chemical plating method and serve as highly efficient and stable cocatalyst toward photocatalytic proton reduction. An effective role in promoting the charge separation and migration of the photocatalytic system is demonstrated for Ni-P clusters, which essentially enhance the photocatalytic H₂-production rate to a value of 1506 μmol h^-1 g^-1. This performance is comparable to that of the benchmark of Pt-modified carbon nitride. This work highlights that the Ni-P alloy could be a potential alternative to noble metal cocatalyst in the photocatalytic reactions.

Key words: Photocatalysis, Hydrogen production, Cocatalyst, Ni-P alloy, Charge transfer

王雅婕, 李瑶, 曹少文, 余家国. 可用于高效光催化制氢的Ni-P团簇改性氮化碳材料[J]. 催化学报, 2019, 40(6): 867-874.

Yajie Wang, Yao Li, Shaowen Cao, Jiaguo Yu. Ni-P cluster modified carbon nitride toward efficient photocatalytic hydrogen production[J]. Chinese Journal of Catalysis, 2019, 40(6): 867-874.

×
扫码分享

导出引用管理器 EndNote|Ris|BibTeX

链接本文: https://www.cjcatal.com/CN/10.1016/S1872-2067(19)63343-7

https://www.cjcatal.com/CN/Y2019/V40/I6/867

参考文献

[1] J. Qi, W. Zhang, R. Cao, Adv. Energy Mater., 2018, 8, 1701620.
[2] J. Yan, P. Verma, Y. Kuwahara, K. Mori, H. Yamashita, Small Methods, 2018, 2, 1800212.
[3] W. Zhang, W. Gao, X. Zhang, Z. Li, G. Lu, Appl. Surf. Sci., 2018, 434, 643-668.
[4] X. Zheng, Y. Yang, S. Chen, L. Zhang, Chin. J. Catal., 2018, 39, 379-389.
[5] Q. Xu, L. Zhang, J. Yu, S. Wageh, A. A. Al-Ghamdi, M. Jaroniec, Mater. Today, 2018, 21, 1042-1063.
[6] J. K. Stolarczyk, S. Bhattacharyya, L. Polavarapu, J. Feldmann, ACS Catal., 2018, 8, 3602-3635.
[7] J. Y. Xu, X. Tong, P. Yu, G. E. Wenya, T. McGrath, M. J. Fong, J. Wu, Z. M. Wang, Adv. Sci, 2018, 5, 1800221.
[8] S. Cao, J. Yu, J. Photochem. Photobio. C, 2016, 27, 72-99.
[9] J. Xiong, J. Di, J. Xia, W. Zhu, H. Li, Adv. Funct. Mater., 2018, 28, 1801983.
[10] K. Qi, B. Cheng, J. Yu, W. Ho, Chin. J. Catal., 2017, 38, 1936-1955.
[11] W. J. Ong, L. L. Tan, Y. H. Ng, S. T. Yong, S. P. Chai, Chem. Rev., 2016, 116, 7159-7329.
[12] X. Wang, G. Zhang, Z. A. Lan, Angew. Chem. Int. Ed., 2016, 55, 15712-15727.
[13] M. Z. Rahman, C. B. Mullins, K. Davey, Adv. Sci., 2018, 5, 1800820.
[14] B. Zhu, L. Zhang, B. Cheng, J. Yu, Appl. Catal. B, 2018, 224, 983-999.
[15] A. Savateev, S. Pronkin, J. D. Epping, M. G. Willinger, C. Wolff, D. Neher, M. Antonietti, D. Dontsova, ChemCatChem, 2017, 9, 167-174.
[16] H. Ou, L. Lin, Y. Zheng, P. Yang, Y. Fang, X. Wang, Adv. Mater., 2017, 29, 1700008.
[17] G. Zhang, G. Li, Z. A. Lan, L. Lin, A. Savateev, T. Heil, S. Zafeiratos, X. Wang, M. Antonietti, Angew. Chem. Int. Ed., 2017, 56, 13445-13449.
[18] S. Guo, Z. Deng, M. Li, B. Jiang, C. Tian, Q. Pan, H. Fu, Angew. Chem. Int. Ed., 2016, 55, 1830-1834.
[19] S. Cao, Q. Huang, B. Zhu, J. Yu, J. Power Sources, 2017, 351, 151-159.
[20] Y. Wang, S. Zhao, Y. Zhang, J. Fang, Y. Zhou, S. Yuan, C. Zhang, W. Chen, Appl. Surf. Sci., 2018, 440, 258-265.
[21] J. Jiang, S. Cao, C. Hu, C. Chen, Chin. J. Catal., 2017, 38, 1981-1989.
[22] C. Yang, W. Teng, Y. Song, Y. Cui, Chin. J. Catal., 2018, 39, 1615-1624.
[23] Z. Dong, Y. Wu, N. Thirugnanam, G. Li, Appl. Surf. Sci., 2018, 430, 293-300.
[24] J. Fu, Q. Xu, J. Low, C. Jiang, J. Yu, Appl. Catal. B, 2019, 243, 556-565.
[25] C. Yin, L. Cui, T. Pu, X. Fang, H. Shi, S. Kang, X. Zhang, Appl. Surf. Sci., 2018, 456, 464-472.
[26] J. Fu, J. Yu, C. Jiang, B. Cheng, Adv. Energy Mater., 2018, 8, 1701503.
[27] Z. Qin, W. Fang, J. Liu, Z. Wei, Z. Jiang, W. Shangguan, Chin. J. Catal., 2018, 39, 472-478.
[28] I. F. Teixeira, E. C. M. Barbosa, S. C. E. Tsang, P. H. C. Camargo, Chem. Soc. Rev., 2018, 47, 7783-7817.
[29] S. Cao, J. Low, J. Yu, M. Jaroniec, Adv. Mater., 2015, 27, 2150-2176.
[30] X. Jin, L. Zhang, X. Fan, J. Tian, M. Wang, J. Shi, Appl. Catal. B, 2018, 237, 888-894.
[31] S. Cao, J. Jiang, B. Zhu, J. Yu, Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys., 2016, 18, 19457-19463.
[32] J. Kosco, I. McCulloch, ACS Energy Lett., 2018, 3, 2846-2850.
[33] S. Cao, H. Li, T. Tong, H. C. Chen, A. Yu, J. Yu, H. M. Chen, Adv. Funct. Mater., 2018, 28, 1802169.
[34] J. Bai, B. Lu, Q. Han, Q. Li, L. Qu, ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces, 2018, 10, 38066-38072.
[35] S. Cao, B. Shen, Q. Huang, Z. Chen, Appl. Surf. Sci., 2018, 442, 361-367.
[36] X. Han, D. Xu, L. An, C. Hou, Y. Li, Q. Zhang, H. Wang, Appl. Catal. B, 2019, 243, 136-144.
[37] Z. Qin, Y. Chen, Z. Huang, J. Su, L. Guo, J. Mater. Chem. A, 2017, 5, 19025-19035.
[38] K. He, J. Xie, X. Luo, J. Wen, S. Ma, X. Li, Y. Fang, X. Zhang, Chin. J. Catal., 2017, 38, 240-252.
[39] N. Li, J. Zhou, Z. Sheng, W. Xiao, Appl. Surf. Sci., 2018, 430, 218-224.
[40] R. Shen, J. Xie, X. Lu, X. Chen, X. Li, ACS Sustain. Chem. Eng., 2018, 6, 4026-4036
[41] J. Sun, L. Duan, Q. Wu, W. Yao, Chem. Eng. J., 2018, 332, 449-455.
[42] R. Shen, J. Xie, H. Zhang, A. Zhang, X. Chen, X. Li, ACS Sustain. Chem. Eng., 2018, 6, 816-826.
[43] Q. Zhao, J. Sun, S. Li, C. Huang, W. Yao, W. Chen, T. Zeng, Q. Wu, Q. Xu, ACS Catal., 2018, 8, 11863-11874.
[44] R. Shen, J. Xie, Y. Ding, S. Y. Liu, A. Adamski, X. Chen, X. Li, ACS Sustain. Chem. Eng., 2019, 7, 3243-3250.
[45] J. Zhang, W. Yao, C. Huang, P. Shi, Q. Xu, J. Mater. Chem. A, 2017, 5, 12513-12519.
[46] X. C. Wang, K. Maeda, A. Thomas, K. Takanabe, G. Xin, J. M. Carlsson, K. Domen, M. Antonietti, Nat. Mater., 2009, 8, 76-80.
[47] Y. Kang, Y. Yang, L. C. Yin, X. Kang, G. Liu, H. M. Cheng, Adv. Mater., 2015, 27, 4572-4577.
[48] J. Wen, J. Xie, H. Zhang, A. Zhang, Y. Liu, X. Chen, X. Li, ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces, 2017, 9, 14031-14042.
[49] Q. Han, B. Wang, Y. Zhao, C. Hu, L. Qu, Angew. Chem. Int. Ed., 2015, 54, 11433-11437.
[50] H. Ou, P. Yang, L. Lin, M. Anpo, X. Wang, Angew. Chem. Int. Ed., 2017, 56, 10905-10910.
[51] B. Zhu, P. Xia, W. Ho, J. Yu, Appl. Surf. Sci., 2015, 344, 188-195.
[52] W. Wan, S. Yu, F. Dong, Q. Zhang, Y. Zhou, J. Mater. Chem. A, 2016, 4, 7823-7829.
[53] Y. Kang, Y. Yang, L. C. Yin, X. Kang, L. Wang, G. Liu, H. M. Cheng, Adv. Mater., 2016, 28, 6471-6477.
[54] W. Zhao, Y. Guo, S. Wang, H. He, C. Sun, S. Yang, Appl. Catal. B, 2015, 165, 335-343.
[55] J. Xiao, Y. Xie, F. Nawaz, Y. Wang, P. Du, H. Cao, Appl. Catal. B, 2016, 183, 417-425.
[56] Q. Xu, C. Jiang, B. Cheng, J. Yu, Dalton trans., 2017, 46, 10611-10619.
[57] H. Zhao, S. Sun, P. Jiang, Z. J. Xu, Chem. Eng. J., 2017, 315, 296-303.
[58] J. F. Moulder, W. F. Stickle, P. E. Sobol, K. D. Bomben, Handbook of X-Ray Photoelectron Spectroscopy, Perkin-Elmer Corporation, Eden Prairie, MN, USA 1992, 85.
[59] J. F. Moulder, W. F. Stickle, P. E. Sobol, K. D. Bomben, Handbook of X-Ray Photoelectron Spectroscopy, Perkin-Elmer Corporation, Eden Prairie, MN, USA 1992, 59.
[60] M. Green, Z. Liu, R. Smedley, H. Nawaz, X. Li, F. Huang, X. Chen, Mater. Today Phys., 2018, 5, 78-86.
[61] M. Green, L. Tian, P. Xiang, J. Murowchick, X. Tan, X. Chen, Mater. Today Nano, 2018, 1, 1-7.

可用于高效光催化制氢的Ni-P团簇改性氮化碳材料

Ni-P cluster modified carbon nitride toward efficient photocatalytic hydrogen production

PDF

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

扫码分享

参考文献

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

[1]	赵彬彬, 钟威, 陈峰, 王苹, 别传彪, 余火根. 高晶化g-C₃N₄光催化剂: 合成、结构调控和光催化产氢[J]. 催化学报, 2023, 52(9): 127-143.
[2]	唐小龙, 李锋, 李方, 江燕斌, 余长林. 单原子催化剂在光催化和电催化合成过氧化氢中的研究进展[J]. 催化学报, 2023, 52(9): 79-98.
[3]	蔡铭洁, 刘艳萍, 董珂欣, 陈晓波, 李世杰. 漂浮型Bi₂WO₆/C₃N₄/碳布S型异质结光催化材料用于高效净化水体环境[J]. 催化学报, 2023, 52(9): 239-251.
[4]	王思恺, 闵祥婷, 乔波涛, 颜宁, 张涛. 单原子催化: 追寻催化领域的“圣杯”[J]. 催化学报, 2023, 52(9): 1-13.
[5]	江梓聪, 程蓓, 张留洋, 张振翼, 别传彪. 氧化锌基梯型异质结光催化剂[J]. 催化学报, 2023, 52(9): 32-49.
[6]	刘博文, 蔡家杰, 张建军, 谭海燕, 程蓓, 许景三. MOF/CdS梯型光催化剂同时进行苯甲醇氧化和析氢反应及其机理研究[J]. 催化学报, 2023, 51(8): 204-215.
[7]	乔蔚, 于立策, 常进法, 杨甫林, 冯立纲. MoSe₂纳米片耦合Pt纳米颗粒用于高效双功能催化甲醇辅助水电解制氢[J]. 催化学报, 2023, 51(8): 113-123.
[8]	宋明明, 宋相海, 刘鑫, 周伟强, 霍鹏伟. ZnIn₂S₄/MOF-808微球结构S型异质结光催化剂的制备及其光还原CO₂性能研究[J]. 催化学报, 2023, 51(8): 180-192.
[9]	李晓娟, 祁明雨, 李婧宇, 谭昌龙, 唐紫蓉, 徐艺军. PdS修饰的ZnIn₂S₄复合材料用于可见光催化硫醇偶联制备二硫化物同时产氢[J]. 催化学报, 2023, 51(8): 55-65.
[10]	邵秀丽, 李可, 李静萍, 程强, 王国宏, 王楷. 揭示NiS@Ta₂O₅纳米纤维中梯型电荷转移路径及光催化CO₂转化性能[J]. 催化学报, 2023, 51(8): 193-203.
[11]	李嘉明, 李源, 王小田, 杨直雄, 张高科. TiO₂上原子分散的Fe位点促进光催化CO₂还原: 增强的催化活性、 DFT计算和机制洞察[J]. 催化学报, 2023, 51(8): 145-156.
[12]	阎菲, 张由子, 刘思碧, 邹睿卿, Jahan B Ghasemi, 李炫华. 供体-受体型卟啉基金属有机框架实现有效电荷分离高效光催化析氢[J]. 催化学报, 2023, 51(8): 124-134.
[13]	孙利娟, 王伟康, 路平, 刘芹芹, 王乐乐, 唐华. 纳米高熵合金实现光催化剂肖特基势垒的调控用于光催化制氢与苯甲醇氧化耦合反应[J]. 催化学报, 2023, 51(8): 90-100.
[14]	刘海峰, 黄祥, 陈加藏. 电子态调控促进氢气无损耗纯化中CO的光致富集和氧化[J]. 催化学报, 2023, 51(8): 49-54.
[15]	袁鑫, 范海滨, 刘杰, 覃龙州, 王剑, 段秀, 邱江凯, 郭凯. 连续流技术在光氧化还原催化转化的最新进展[J]. 催化学报, 2023, 50(7): 175-194.