BUC-21/N-K2Ti4O9复合材料光催化去除Cr(VI): 组成上的细微差异导致性能上的巨大差异

doi:10.1016/S1872-2067(20)63629-4

催化学报 ›› 2021, Vol. 42 ›› Issue (2): 259-270.DOI: 10.1016/S1872-2067(20)63629-4

BUC-21/N-K₂Ti₄O₉复合材料光催化去除Cr(VI): 组成上的细微差异导致性能上的巨大差异

王恂^a, 李玉璇^a, 衣晓虹^a, 赵晨^a, 王鹏^a, 邓积光^b^,^*(), 王崇臣^a^,^#()

^a北京建筑大学建筑结构与环境修复功能材料北京重点实验室, 北京100044
^b北京工业大学环境与能源工程学院化学与化工系, 北京100022

收稿日期:2020-03-23 接受日期:2020-05-05 出版日期:2021-02-18 发布日期:2021-01-21
通讯作者: 邓积光,王崇臣
基金资助:
国家自然科学基金(51878023);北京自然科学基金(8202016);北京市属高等学校长城学者培养计划(CIT&TCD20180323);北京市百千万人才工程(2019A22);北京建筑大学研究生创新项目(PG2019038)

Photocatalytic Cr(VI) elimination over BUC-21/N-K₂Ti₄O₉ composites: Big differences in performance resulting from small differences in composition

Xun Wang^a, Yu-Xuan Li^a, Xiao-Hong Yi^a, Chen Zhao^a, Peng Wang^a, Jiguang Deng^b^,^*(), Chong-Chen Wang^a^,^#()

^aBeijing Key Laboratory of Functional Materials for Building Structure and Environment Remediation, School of Environment and Energy Engineering, Beijing University of Civil Engineering and Architecture, Beijing 100044, China
^bDepartment of Chemistry and Chemical Engineering, College of Environmental and Energy Engineering, Beijing University of Technology, Beijing 100022, China

Received:2020-03-23 Accepted:2020-05-05 Online:2021-02-18 Published:2021-01-21
Contact: Jiguang Deng,Chong-Chen Wang
About author:^#E-mail: wangchongchen@bucea.edu.cn, chongchenwang@126.com
^*Tel/Fax: +86-10-61209186; E-mail: jgdeng@bjut.edu.cn;
Supported by:
National Natural Science Foundation of China(51878023);Beijing Natural Science Foundation(8202016);Great Wall Scholars Training Program Project of Beijing Municipality Universities(CIT&TCD20180323);Beijing Talent Project(2019A22);BUCEA Post Graduate Innovation Project(PG2019038)

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

近年来, 金属-有机骨架(MOFs)作为一种多相光催化剂因其合成方法多样、活性位点可调等优点被越来越多地应用于光催化还原Cr(VI)、还原CO₂和降解有机污染物等领域. 但多数MOFs被其电导率低、电子与空穴的快速复合以及仅在紫外光下激发下才能表现出光催化活性等缺点限制了其进一步应用. 为此, 与g-C₃N₄、Ag₂CO₃、TiO₂、Bi₂₄O₃₁Br₁₀等半导体、电活性聚合物(PANI)、导体(RGO)、贵金属纳米颗粒(Ag, Pd)等构建复合物是增强MOFs光催化性能的一个有效策略.
本文采用简单的机械球磨法, 以BUC-21和N-K₂Ti₄O₉为前驱体快速制备了一系列BUC-21/N-K₂Ti₄O₉复合材料(记为B1NX, 其中X = 0.2, 0.5, 1, 2, 3和4, 代表N-K₂Ti₄O₉在复合物中的比例). 采用粉末X射线衍射(PXRD)、傅里叶变换红外光谱(FTIR)、扫描电镜(SEM)、透射电镜(TEM)、高倍透射电镜(HRTEM)、紫外-可见漫反射(UV-Vis DRS)和X射线光电子能谱(XPS)等技术对UAC-X复合物的形貌和结构进行了表征. 研究了B1NX在紫外光和白光照射下光催化还原六价铬(Cr(VI))的性能. 探究了不同pH (pH = 2-8)、不同小分子有机酸(柠檬酸、酒石酸和草酸)及共存离子(自来水和湖水中的离子)对光催化还原Cr(VI)的影响. 结果表明, PXRD谱图显示B1NX的衍射峰位置分别与BUC-21和N-K₂Ti₄O₉峰位置完全吻合. SEM、TEM、EDS和HRTEM图片证明在B1NX复合物中BUC-21附着在N-K₂Ti₄O₉表面. 在紫外光照射下40 min后, B1N0.5的光催化活性最高, 还原效率达到100.0%, 且还原速率是BUC-21的1.42倍. 而在白光照射下, 随着N-K₂Ti₄O₉含量的增加, 复合物的光催化活性先增后减. 最佳比例B1N3可在100 min时还原99%的Cr(VI), 远远优于对Cr(VI)几乎无还原能力的BUC-21和N-K₂Ti₄O₉. 这是因为N-K₂Ti₄O₉含量的增加不仅有利于电荷的转移, 也有利于白光的利用. 在紫外光和白光照射下, 随着溶液pH值从2提高到8, 还原效率逐渐降低. 这是因为在酸性条件下H⁺浓度高有利于Cr(VI)还原为Cr(III), 而当pH>6时, Cr³⁺与OH^-形成Cr(OH)₃沉淀附着在催化剂表面, 影响对光的吸收, 降低了光催化效率. 当反应体系中加入草酸、柠檬酸和酒石酸等小分子有机酸时, 光催化速率得到显著提高, 这是由于小分子链烃有机物容易捕捉光生空穴. 共存离子实验表明, 虽然湖水和自来水中的共存离子对B1N0.5和B1N3的还原性能稍有抑制, 但当反应时间延长时, 这种影响可忽略不计. 表观量子效率实验证明B1NX还原Cr(VI)是光诱导过程. 光致发光分析、时间分辨光致发光分析、电化学分析、电子自旋共振(ESR)和活性物质捕获实验显示, B1N0.5和B1N3中BUC-21最低未占轨道(LUMO)上的光生电子转移至N-K₂Ti₄O₉导带, 提高了光生电子和空穴的分离效率, 最终增强了光催化还原Cr(VI)的活性. N-K₂Ti₄O₉的引入也使得BUC-21的光吸收区域拓展至白光, 实现了其实际应用的潜力. 同时, B1N0.5在紫外光照射下和B1N3在白光照射下经过5次光催化循环实验后其还原Cr(VI)效率仍然可达99%, 且PXRD谱图、SEM和TEM图像未见明显变化, 表明其具有稳定性和重复利用性. 综上, BUC-21/N-K₂Ti₄O₉是一种具有应用前景的高效复合型光催化剂.

关键词: BUC-21, N-K₂Ti₄O₉, 光催化, 六价铬, 紫外光和白光

Abstract:

A series of BUC-21/N-K₂Ti₄O₉ composites (B1NX) were facilely fabricated from BUC-21 and N-K₂Ti₄O₉ via ball-milling, and they were fully characterized using various techniques. The photocatalytic reduction of Cr(VI) over the B1NX composites was investigated systematically under various conditions, including different light sources, pH values, hole scavengers, and inorganic ions, in both real lake water and tap water. The BUC-21/N-K₂Ti₄O₉ composites demonstrated remarkable photocatalytic Cr(VI) reduction performance, good reusability, and stability under both UV and white light irradiation. The introduction of N-K₂Ti₄O₉ into BUC-21 not only broadened its light absorption region to white light, but also strongly inhibited the recombination of the photo-generated electrons and holes. Mechanisms of photocatalytic Cr(VI) reduction under both UV light and white light were proposed and verified by electrochemical measurements, active species capture experiments, and ESR measurements.

Key words: BUC-21, N-K₂Ti₄O₉, Photocatalysis, Hexavalent chromium, UV and white light

王恂, 李玉璇, 衣晓虹, 赵晨, 王鹏, 邓积光, 王崇臣. BUC-21/N-K₂Ti₄O₉复合材料光催化去除Cr(VI): 组成上的细微差异导致性能上的巨大差异[J]. 催化学报, 2021, 42(2): 259-270.

Xun Wang, Yu-Xuan Li, Xiao-Hong Yi, Chen Zhao, Peng Wang, Jiguang Deng, Chong-Chen Wang. Photocatalytic Cr(VI) elimination over BUC-21/N-K₂Ti₄O₉ composites: Big differences in performance resulting from small differences in composition[J]. Chinese Journal of Catalysis, 2021, 42(2): 259-270.

×
扫码分享

导出引用管理器 EndNote|Ris|BibTeX

链接本文: https://www.cjcatal.com/CN/10.1016/S1872-2067(20)63629-4

https://www.cjcatal.com/CN/Y2021/V42/I2/259

图/表 14

Table 1 Ratios of BUC-21 and N-K2Ti4O9 used to prepare the BUC-21/N-K2Ti4O9 composites.

No.	BUC-21/mg	N-K₂Ti₄O₉/mg	Code name
1 2 3 4 5 6	166.7 133.3 100 66.7 50 40	33.3 66.6 100 133.3 150 160	B1N0.2 B1N0.5 B1N1 B1N2 B1N3 B1N4

Fig. 1. (a) PXRD patterns and (b) FTIR spectra of BUC-21, N-K2Ti4O9, and the series of B1NX composites.

Fig. 2. TEM images of (a) pristine BUC-21, (b) pristine N-K2Ti4O9, (c) B1N0.5, and (d) B1N3.

Fig. 3. EDS elemental mappings of (a) B1N0.5 and (b) B1N3.

Fig. 4. HRTEM images of (a) B1N0.5 and (b) B1N3.

Fig. 5. (a) XPS survey spectrum, (b) Zn 2p spectrum, (c) Ti 2p spectrum, (d) O 1s spectrum, and (e) N 1s spectrum of B1N0.5.

Fig. 6. (a) XPS survey spectrum, (b) Zn 2p spectrum, (c) Ti 2p spectrum, (d) O 1s spectrum, and (e) N 1s spectrum of B1N3.

Fig. 7. (a) UV-vis DRS spectra and (b) Eg plots of BUC-21, N-K2Ti4O9, and the series of B1NX composites.

Fig. 8. (a) and (d) Photocatalytic Cr(VI) removal efficiencies of BUC-21, N-K2Ti4O9, and the B1NX composites under UV and white light irradiation, respectively. (b) and (e) Reaction rate constants (k) of the different photocatalysts. (c) and (f) Effect of the initial pH on Cr(VI) removal under UV and white light irradiation, respectively. Conditions: photocatalyst = 0.175 g L-1, Cr(VI) = 10 mg L-1, 200 mL, pH = 2.0.

Fig. 9. (a) and (c) Photocatalytic Cr(VI) elimination over B1N0.5 and B1N3 in the presence of various hole scavengers under UV and white light irradiation, respectively. (b) and (d) Influence of water quality on Cr(VI) removal over B1N0.5 and B1N3. Conditions: Photocatalyst = 0.175 g L-1, Cr(VI) = 10 mg L-1, 200 mL, pH = 2.0.

Fig. 10. (a) and (c) Reusability of B1N0.5 and B1N3 for the reduction of Cr(VI). (b) and (d) PXRD patterns of B1N0.5 and B1N3 before and after the five reactions.

Fig. 11. AQE of Cr(VI) reduction over B1N0.5 (a) and B1N3 (b) under monochromatic light of various wavelengths and the corresponding column chart (c).

Fig. 12. ESR spectra of ?O2- in aqueous dispersions over BUC-21 (a), N-K2Ti4O9 (b), and B1N0.5 (c) under UV irradiation and over BUC-21 (d), N-K2Ti4O9 (e), and B1N3 (f) under white light irradiation.

Fig. 13. (a) Effects of various capture agents on the reduction of Cr(VI) over (a) B1N0.5 and (b) B1N3. (c) Valence band XPS spectra of N-K2Ti4O9. (d) Proposed mechanism of photocatalytic Cr(VI) elimination over BUC-21/N-K2Ti4O9.

参考文献

[1]	C. -C. Wang, X.-D. Du, J. Li, X.-X. Guo, P. Wang, J. Zhang, Appl. Catal. B, 2016,193, 198-216.
[2]	X. Yuan, H. Wang, J. Wang, G. Zeng, X. Chen, Z. Wu, L. Jiang, T. Xiong, J. Zhang, H. Wang, Catal. Sci. Technol., 2018,8, 1545-1554.
[3]	Q. Zeng, Y. Huang, H. Wang, L. Huang, L. Hu, H. Zhong, Z. He, J. Hazard. Mater., 2020,383, 121199.
[4]	Q. Sun, X. Hu, S. Zheng, J. Zhang, J. Sheng, Environ. Pollut., 2019,245, 53-62.
[5]	B. Wu, D. Peng, S. Hou, B. Tang, C. Wang, H. Xu, Environ. Pollut., 2018,240, 717-724.
[6]	Z. Ren, D. Kong, K. Wang, W. Zhang, J. Mater. Chem. A, 2014,2, 17952-17961.
[7]	Y. Gao, W. Sun, W. Yang, Q. Li, J. Mater. Sci. Technol., 2018,34, 961-968.
[8]	J. Geng, F. Gu, J. Chang, J. Hazard. Mater., 2019,375, 174-181.
[9]	H. Wang, X. Yuan, Y. Wu, X. Chen, L. Leng, H. Wang, H. Li, G. Zeng, Chem. Eng. J., 2015,262, 597-606.
[10]	J. Xu, C. Liu, J. Niu, Y. Zhu, B. Zang, M. Xie, M. Chen, J. Alloy. Compd., 2019,815, 152492.
[11]	Q. Xu, R. Li, C. Wang, D. Yuan, J Alloy Compd., 2017,723, 441-447.
[12]	M. Y. Akram, M. U. Hameed, N. Akhtar, S. Ali, I. Maitlo, X.-Q. Zhu, N. Jun, J. Hazard. Mater., 2019,366, 723-731.
[13]	C. -C. Wang, Y.-S. Ho, Scientometrics, 2016,109, 481-513.
[14]	X. -D. Du, C.-C. Wang, J. Zhong, J.-G. Liu, Y.-X. Li, P. Wang, J. Environ. Chem. Eng., 2017,5, 1866-1873.
[15]	M. Li, Y. Liu, C. Shen, F. Li, C.-C. Wang, M. Huang, B. Yang, Z. Wang, J. Yang, W. Sand, J. Hazard. Mater., 2019, 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2019.121840.
[16]	S. Chavan, J. G. Vitillo, D. Gianolio, O. Zavorotynska, B. Civalleri, S. r. Jakobsen, M. H. Nilsen, L. Valenzano, C. Lamberti, K. P. Lillerud, Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys., 2012,14, 1614-1610.
[17]	N. Chang, X.-P. Yan, J. Chromatogr. A, 2012,1257, 116-124.
[18]	X. -F. Zhang, Y. Feng, Z. Wang, M. Jia, J. Yao, J. Membr. Sci., 2018,568, 10-16.
[19]	S. -W. Lv, J.-M. Liu, C.-Y. Li, N. Zhao, Z.-H. Wang, S. Wang, Chem. Eng. J., 2019,375, 122111.
[20]	X. Qiao, Y. Han, D. Tian, Z. Yang, J. Li, S. Zhao, Sens. Actuators B, 2019,286, 1-8.
[21]	H. Wang, X. Yuan, G. Zeng, Y. Wu, Y. Liu, Q. Jiang, S. Gu, Adv. Colloid Interface Sci., 2015,221, 41-59.
[22]	L. Shen, W. Wu, R. Liang, R. Lin, L. Wu, Nanoscale, 2013,5, 9374-9382.
[23]	P. Li, M. Guo, Q. Wang, Z. Li, C. Wang, N. Chen, C.-C. Wang, C. Wan, S. Chen, Appl. Catal. B, 2019,259, 118107.
[24]	J. Qiu, X. Zhang, Y. Feng, X. Zhang, H. Wang, J. Yao, Appl. Catal. B, 2018,231, 317-342.
[25]	Z. Wang, L. Song, Y. Wang, X.-F. Zhang, D. Hao, Y. Feng, J. Yao, Chem. Eng. J., 2019,371, 138-144.
[26]	X. Wang, W. Liu, H. Fu, X.-H. Yi, P. Wang, C. Zhao, C.-C. Wang, W. Zheng, Environ. Pollut., 2019,249, 502-511.
[27]	Y.-C. Zhou, P. Wang, H. Fu, C. Zhao, C.-C. Wang, Chin. Chem. Lett., 2020, 10.1016/j.cclet.2020.02.048.
[28]	Q. Mu, W. Zhu, X. Li, C. Zhang, Y. Su, Y. Lian, P. Qi, Z. Deng, D. Zhang, S. Wang, X. Zhu, Y. Peng, Appl. Catal. B, 2020,262, 118144.
[29]	W. Chen, B. Han, C. Tian, X. Liu, S. Liang, H. Deng, Z. Lin, Appl. Catal. B, 2019,244, 996-1003.
[30]	X. Zhang, J. Wang, X.-X. Dong, Y.-K. Lv, Chemosphere, 2020,242, 125144.
[31]	Y. Li, Y. Fang, Z. Cao, N. Li, D. Chen, Q. Xu, J. Lu, Appl. Catal. B, 2019,250, 150-162.
[32]	L. Luo, Y. Wang, S. Huo, P. Lv, J. Fang, Y. Yang, B. Fei, Int. J. Hydrogen Energy, 2019,44, 30965-30973.
[33]	Z. Wang, Z. Jin, G. Wang, B. Ma, Int. J. Hydrogen Energy, 2018,43, 13039-13050.
[34]	C. -C. Wang, X.-H. Yi, P. Wang, Appl. Catal. B, 2019,247, 24-48.
[35]	H. Wang, X. Yuan, Y. Wu, G. Zeng, X. Chen, L. Leng, H. Li, Appl. Catal. B, 2015, 174-175, 445-454.
[36]	Y. -C. Zhou, X.-Y. Xu, P. Wang, H. Fu, C. Zhao, C.-C. Wang, Chin. J. Catal., 2019,40, 1912-1923.
[37]	C.-C. Wang, X. Wang, W. Liu, Chem. Eng. J., 2020, 2020, 10.1016/j.cej.2019.123601.
[38]	C. Zhao, Z. Wang, X. Li X.-H. Yi H. Chu X. Chen C.-C. Wang, Chem. Eng. J., 2020, 10.1016/j.cej.2019.123431
[39]	D. -D. Chen, X.-H. Yi, C. Zhao, H. Fu, P. Wang, C.-C. Wang, Chemosphere, 2020,245, 125659.
[40]	S. Zhang, Y. Wang, Z. Cao, J. Xu, J. Hu, Y. Huang, C. Cui, H. Liu, H. Wang, Chem. Eng. J., 2020,381, 122771.
[41]	Q. Li, S. Gong, H. Zhang, F. Huang, L. Zhang, S. Li, Chem. Eng. J., 2019,371, 26-33.
[42]	S. Zheng, P. Yang, F. Zhang, D.-L. Chen, W. Zhu, Chem. Eng. J., 2017,328, 977-987.
[43]	F. -X. Wang, X.-H. Yi, C.-C. Wang, J. G. Deng, Chin. J. Catal., 2017,38, 2141-2149.
[44]	X. -H. Yi, F.-X. Wang, X.-D. Du, P. Wang, C.-C. Wang, Appl. Organomet. Chem., 2019,33, e4621.
[45]	W. Cui, S. Ma, L. Liu, J. Hu, Y. Liang, J. Mol. Catal. A, 2012,359, 35-41.
[46]	S. Li, X. Wang, Q. He, Q. Chen, Y. Xu, H. Yang, M. Lü, F. Wei, X. Liu, Chin. J. Catal., 2016,37, 367-377.
[47]	F. Wang, Y. T. Zhang, Y. Xu, X. Wang, S. Li, H. Yang, X. Liu, F. Wei, J. Environ. Chem. Eng., 2016,4, 3364-3373.
[48]	Q. Chen, Q. He, M. Lv, X. Liu, J. Wang, J. Lv, Appl. Surf. Sci., 2014,311, 230-238.
[49]	M. R. Allen, A. Thibert, E. M. Sabio, N. D. Browning, D. S. Larsen, F. E. Osterloh, Chem. Mater., 2014,22, 1220-1228.
[50]	D. Mitoraj, H. Kisch, Angew. Chem. Int. Ed., 2008,47, 9975-9978.
[51]	Y. -X. Li, H. Fu, P. Wang, C. Zhao, W. Liu, C.-C. Wang, Environ. Pollut., 2020,256, 113417.
[52]	S. Ouyang, J. Ye, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2011,133, 7757-7763.
[53]	X. H. Yi, S.-Q. Ma, X. D. Du, C. Zhao, H. Fu, P. Wang, C. C. Wang, Chem. Eng. J., 2019,375, 121944.
[54]	W. Fang, T. Z. Yong, Y. Xu, W. Xing, S. Li, H. Yang, X. Liu, F. Wei, J. Environ. Chem. Eng., 2016,4, 3364-3373.
[55]	Y. Xu, C. Qi, H. Yang, M. Lv, Q. He, X. Liu, F. Wei, Mater. Sci. Semicon. Proc., 2015,36, 115-123.
[56]	Q. Chen, Q. He, M. Lv, X. Liu, W. Jin, J. Lv, Appl. Surf. Sci., 2014,311, 230-238.
[57]	S. Li, X. Wang, Q. Chen, Q. He, M. Lv, X. Liu, J. Lv, F. Wei, RSC Adv., 2015,5, 53198-53206.
[58]	M. Sun, Y. Fang, S. Sun, Y. Wang, RSC Adv., 2016,6, 12272-12279.
[59]	X. Liu, Z. Xing, Y. Zhang, Z. Li, X. Wu, S. Tan, X. Yu, Q. Zhu, W. Zhou, Appl. Catal. B, 2017,201, 119-127.
[60]	Z. Jiang, W. Wei, D. Mao, C. Chen, Y. Shi, X. Lv, J. Xie, Nanoscale, 2015,7, 784-797.
[61]	X. -D. Du, X.-H. Yi, P. Wang, J. G. Deng, C.-C. Wang, Chin. J. Catal., 2019,40, 70-79.
[62]	C. E. Barrera-Díaz, V. Lugo-Lugo, B. Bilyeu, J. Hazard. Mater., 2012, 223-224, 1-12.
[63]	C. J. Murphy, J. M. Buriak, Chem. Mater., 2015,27, 4911-4913.
[64]	Q. Liu, C. Zeng, L. Ai, Z. Hao, J. Jiang, Appl. Catal. B, 2018,224, 38-45.
[65]	X. -D. Du, X.-H. Yi, P. Wang, W. Zheng, J. Deng, C.-C. Wang, Chem. Eng. J., 2019,356, 393-399.
[66]	S. Lin, L. Liu, J. Hu, Y. Liang, W. Cui, J. Mol. Struct., 2015,1081, 260-267.
[67]	J. -C. Wang, J. Ren, H.-C. Yao, L. Zhang, J.-S. Wang, S.-Q. Zang, L.-F. Han, Z.-J. Li, J. Hazard. Mater., 2016,311, 11-19.
[68]	G. Dong, L. Zhang, J. Phys. Chem. C, 2013,117, 4062-4068.
[69]	X. Hu, H. Ji, F. Chang, Y. Luo, Catal. Today, 2014,224, 34-40.
[70]	L. Wang, G. Zhou, Y. Tian, L. Yan, M. Deng, B. Yang, Z. Kang, H. Sun, Appl. Catal. B, 2019,244, 262-271.

BUC-21/N-K₂Ti₄O₉复合材料光催化去除Cr(VI): 组成上的细微差异导致性能上的巨大差异

Photocatalytic Cr(VI) elimination over BUC-21/N-K₂Ti₄O₉ composites: Big differences in performance resulting from small differences in composition

RichHTML

PDF

Supporting Information

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

扫码分享

图/表 14

参考文献

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

[1]	赵彬彬, 钟威, 陈峰, 王苹, 别传彪, 余火根. 高晶化g-C₃N₄光催化剂: 合成、结构调控和光催化产氢[J]. 催化学报, 2023, 52(9): 127-143.
[2]	唐小龙, 李锋, 李方, 江燕斌, 余长林. 单原子催化剂在光催化和电催化合成过氧化氢中的研究进展[J]. 催化学报, 2023, 52(9): 79-98.
[3]	蔡铭洁, 刘艳萍, 董珂欣, 陈晓波, 李世杰. 漂浮型Bi₂WO₆/C₃N₄/碳布S型异质结光催化材料用于高效净化水体环境[J]. 催化学报, 2023, 52(9): 239-251.
[4]	王思恺, 闵祥婷, 乔波涛, 颜宁, 张涛. 单原子催化: 追寻催化领域的“圣杯”[J]. 催化学报, 2023, 52(9): 1-13.
[5]	江梓聪, 程蓓, 张留洋, 张振翼, 别传彪. 氧化锌基梯型异质结光催化剂[J]. 催化学报, 2023, 52(9): 32-49.
[6]	刘博文, 蔡家杰, 张建军, 谭海燕, 程蓓, 许景三. MOF/CdS梯型光催化剂同时进行苯甲醇氧化和析氢反应及其机理研究[J]. 催化学报, 2023, 51(8): 204-215.
[7]	宋明明, 宋相海, 刘鑫, 周伟强, 霍鹏伟. ZnIn₂S₄/MOF-808微球结构S型异质结光催化剂的制备及其光还原CO₂性能研究[J]. 催化学报, 2023, 51(8): 180-192.
[8]	邵秀丽, 李可, 李静萍, 程强, 王国宏, 王楷. 揭示NiS@Ta₂O₅纳米纤维中梯型电荷转移路径及光催化CO₂转化性能[J]. 催化学报, 2023, 51(8): 193-203.
[9]	李嘉明, 李源, 王小田, 杨直雄, 张高科. TiO₂上原子分散的Fe位点促进光催化CO₂还原: 增强的催化活性、 DFT计算和机制洞察[J]. 催化学报, 2023, 51(8): 145-156.
[10]	阎菲, 张由子, 刘思碧, 邹睿卿, Jahan B Ghasemi, 李炫华. 供体-受体型卟啉基金属有机框架实现有效电荷分离高效光催化析氢[J]. 催化学报, 2023, 51(8): 124-134.
[11]	孙利娟, 王伟康, 路平, 刘芹芹, 王乐乐, 唐华. 纳米高熵合金实现光催化剂肖特基势垒的调控用于光催化制氢与苯甲醇氧化耦合反应[J]. 催化学报, 2023, 51(8): 90-100.
[12]	刘海峰, 黄祥, 陈加藏. 电子态调控促进氢气无损耗纯化中CO的光致富集和氧化[J]. 催化学报, 2023, 51(8): 49-54.
[13]	袁鑫, 范海滨, 刘杰, 覃龙州, 王剑, 段秀, 邱江凯, 郭凯. 连续流技术在光氧化还原催化转化的最新进展[J]. 催化学报, 2023, 50(7): 175-194.
[14]	刘德法, 孙彬, 白硕杰, 高婷婷, 周国伟. 双助催化剂Ag/Ti₃C₂/TiO₂分层花状微球用于增强光催化产氢活性[J]. 催化学报, 2023, 50(7): 273-283.
[15]	肖汉至, 于博, 颜思顺, 章炜, 李茜茜, 鲍莹, 罗书平, 叶剑衡, 余达刚. 可见光催化二氧化碳参与非活化烯烃1,3-双羧基化反应[J]. 催化学报, 2023, 50(7): 222-228.