光热协同催化去除挥发性有机化合物和CO的研究进展

doi:10.1016/S1872-2067(20)63721-4

催化学报 ›› 2021, Vol. 42 ›› Issue (7): 1078-1095.DOI: 10.1016/S1872-2067(20)63721-4

光热协同催化去除挥发性有机化合物和CO的研究进展

魏龙福^a, 余长林^a^,^*(), 杨凯^b, 樊启哲^a, 纪红兵^a^,^#()

^a广东石油化工学院环境科学与工程学院, 化学工程学院, 广东省石油化工污染过程与控制重点实验室, 广东茂名525000
^b江西理工大学冶金与化学工程学院, 江西赣州341000

收稿日期:2020-09-14 接受日期:2020-10-09 出版日期:2021-07-18 发布日期:2020-12-10
通讯作者: 余长林,纪红兵
基金资助:
国家自然科学基金(21961160741);国家自然科学基金(21962006);国家自然科学基金(21707055);广东省高等学校珠江学者特聘教授资助计划(2019);广东省教育厅普通高校重点项目(自然)(2019KZDXM010);广东省重点研发计划(2019B110206002);江西省主要学术与学科带头人(20172BCB22018);广东省基础与应用基础研究基金(2019A1515011249);茂名市科技计划项目(2020544);广东石油化工学院科研基金项目(2019rc060);广东省普通高校青年创新人才类项目(2019KQNCX089);茂名市科技专项资金计划项目(2020KJZX024);茂名市科技专项资金计划项目(2020KJZX035)

Recent advances in VOCs and CO removal via photothermal synergistic catalysis

Longfu Wei^a, Changlin Yu^a^,^*(), Kai Yang^b, Qizhe Fan^a, Hongbing Ji^a^,^#()

^aSchool of Environmental Science and Engineering, School of Chemical Engineering, Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Petrochemcial Pollution Processes and Control, Guangdong University of Petrochemical Technology, Maoming 525000, Guangdong, China
^bSchool of Metallurgy and Chemical Engineering, Jiangxi University of Science and Technology, Ganzhou 341000, Jiangxi, China

Received:2020-09-14 Accepted:2020-10-09 Online:2021-07-18 Published:2020-12-10
Contact: Changlin Yu,Hongbing Ji
About author:^# E-mail: jihb@mail.sysu.edu.cn
^* Tel/Fax: +86-668-2923259; E-mail: yuchanglinjx@163.com;
Supported by:
National Natural Science Foundation of China(21961160741);National Natural Science Foundation of China(21962006);National Natural Science Foundation of China(21707055);Project Supported by Guangdong Province Universities and Colleges Pearl River Scholar Funded Scheme (2019);Key Research Project of Natural Science of Guangdong Provincial Department of Education(2019KZDXM010);Guangdong Provincial Key R&D Programme(2019B110206002);Academic and Technical Leaders of the Main Disciplines in Jiangxi Province(20172BCB22018);Guangdong Basic and Applied Basic Research Foundation(2019A1515011249);Science and Technology Planned Project of Maoming(2020544);Research Fund Project of Guangdong University of Petrochemical Technology(2019rc060);Young Innovative Talents Projects in Ordinary Universities in Guangdong Province(2019KQNCX089);Science and Technology Special Plan Project of Maoming(2020KJZX024);Science and Technology Special Plan Project of Maoming(2020KJZX035)

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

随着社会和经济的快速发展, 环境污染和能源短缺等问题, 尤其是空气污染, 已经影响了人类的可持续发展. 挥发性有机化合物(VOCs), 如苯、甲苯、甲醛和丙酮是主要的空气污染物, 它们主要来源于油漆、有机化学品、石油化工产品、药物和工业生产过程. 大多VOCs具有特殊的气味, 而且具有一定的毒性、致畸性和致癌作用, 尤其是苯、甲苯和甲醛等, 会对人类的身体健康产生巨大的负面作用. 因此, 研发新型高效VOCs处理技术迫在眉睫. 除VOCs外, CO也是非常常见的空气污染物, 在室温条件下, 它无色无味, 没有刺激性且易燃易爆. CO主要来源于煤和石油等含碳材料的不完全燃烧. 在日常生活中很容易被排放到大气中. 在室温下, CO分子是非常稳定的, 很难与其它气体分子发生化学反应. 因此, CO的活化和转化是一项具有挑战性的工作.
催化氧化技术是在催化剂存在的条件下进行的氧化反应, 可以将VOCs直接氧化成为无毒无害的CO₂和H₂O, 也可将CO氧化成CO₂. 光催化技术是一种新型的环境友好型技术, 可在常温常压下进行, 反应条件温和、能耗小、操作简单, 成本低, 氧化产物为无毒无害物质, 以及不存在二次污染等优点. 但光催化反应效率较低, 主要通过入射光的能量驱动化学反应. 热催化则通过升温的方法来驱动化学反应. 目前, 热催化剂主要为贵金属型催化剂, 其具有催化活性较高, 选择性较好且不存在二次污染等优点. 但高能耗影响产物的稳定性和选择性, 此外, 贵金属的使用导致成本增加. 光热协同催化可以整合光催化和热催化的优势, 并弥补各自的不足, 形成一种协同效应, 是一种新颖的催化反应.
目前, 关于光催化或热催化高效去除VOCs和CO的综述较多, 但很少有关于光热协同催化高效去除VOCs和CO的综述. 本综述重点讨论光热协同催化高效去除VOCs和CO的最新研究进展. 首先, 介绍了光热协同催化的概况, 如设计光热催化材料和催化反应器等. 其次, 重点介绍苯、甲苯、乙醇、甲醛、乙醛和丙酮等几种典型VOCs的光热协同催化的最新研究进展. 再次, 总结了光热协同催化CO加氢和氧化的最新研究进展. 此外, 还探讨了光热协同催化去除VOCs和CO的可能反应机理. 最后, 对光热协同催化的应用前景进行了展望.

关键词: 挥发性有机化合物, CO, 光催化, 热催化, 光热协同催化

Abstract:

Currently, air pollution is being exacerbated by rapid social, economic, and industrial development. Major air pollutants include volatile organic compounds (VOCs) and CO. Photocatalytic and thermocatalytic technology can be used to convert VOCs and CO into harmless gases effectively. Recently, photothermal synergistic catalysis has aroused much attention because of its higher performance than those of individual photocatalytic and thermocatalytic processes. There have been many reviews on separate photocatalysts and thermocatalysts for the treatment of VOCs and CO, but few reviews have focused on photothermal synergistic catalysis. In this minireview, we concentrate on recent progress into photothermal synergistic catalysis for the efficient removal of VOCs and CO. The treatment of typical VOCs (such as benzene, toluene, ethanol, formaldehyde, acetone, propylene, and propane) and CO are summarized and analyzed. Furthermore, we discuss the use of conventional reactor technology, such as fixed-bed quartz reactors, for VOCs and CO removal. We also discuss the mechanism of the photothermal synergistic catalytic removal of VOCs and CO. Finally, we present perspectives for the photothermal synergistic catalytic removal of VOCs and CO.

Key words: Volatile organic compounds, Carbon monoxide, Photocatalysis, Thermocatalysis, Photothermal synergistic catalysis

魏龙福, 余长林, 杨凯, 樊启哲, 纪红兵. 光热协同催化去除挥发性有机化合物和CO的研究进展[J]. 催化学报, 2021, 42(7): 1078-1095.

Longfu Wei, Changlin Yu, Kai Yang, Qizhe Fan, Hongbing Ji. Recent advances in VOCs and CO removal via photothermal synergistic catalysis[J]. Chinese Journal of Catalysis, 2021, 42(7): 1078-1095.

×
扫码分享

导出引用管理器 EndNote|Ris|BibTeX

链接本文: https://www.cjcatal.com/CN/10.1016/S1872-2067(20)63721-4

https://www.cjcatal.com/CN/Y2021/V42/I7/1078

图/表 25

Fig. 1. Types of synergistic photothermocatalysts. (a) A coupled photocatalyst and thermocatalyst; (b) A dual-function catalyst.

Fig. 2. Schematic of a typical photothermal synergistic catalytic setup. Reprinted with permission from Ref. [63]. Copyright (2015) American Chemical Society.

Table 1 Summary and comparison of the performance of photocatalytic (PC), thermocatalytic (TC), and PTC degradation of VOCs.

Catalyst	VOCs		Light source			PC activity					TC activity						PTC activity							Ref.
Catalyst	VOCs		Light source			T/°C		t/min		C/%	T/°C		t/min		C/%		T/°C			t/min		C/%		Ref.
Anatase TiO₂ {001}	benzene		Hg			RT		65		42	—		—		—		290			65		78		[70]
Rutile TiO₂	benzene		UV			RT		160		50	280		160		18		280			160		70		[71]
TiO₂	benzene		UV			40		60		40	240		60		15		240			60		100		[72]
0.1 wt% Pt/TiO₂	benzene		UV			—		—		—	240		60		89		240			30		100		[72]
TiO₂	benzene		fluorescent black light bulb			—		—		—	140		300		30		140			300		86		[73]
0.1 wt% Pt/TiO₂	benzene		fluorescent black light bulb			—		—		—	70		120		8		70			120		100		[73]
Zr-doped Pt/TiO₂	benzene		UV			50		150		65	200		150		43		200			150		97		[74]
Pt-loaded TiO₂/ZrO₂	benzene		Germicidal lamps			—		—		—	—		—		—		150			960		100		[75]
MnO₂	benzene		Xe			—		—		—	—		—		—		—			30		100		[77]
Co₃O₄	benzene		Xe			—		—		—	—		—		—		—			40		100		[86]
Mn_xFeO_y-70	benzene		Xe			—		—		—	—		—		—		244			25		100		[87]
Catalyst		VOCs		Light source	PC activity							TC activity						PTC activity					Ref.
Catalyst		VOCs		Light source	T/°C		t/min		C/%			T/°C		t/min		C/%		T/°C	t/min		C/%		Ref.
Pt/CeO₂-MM		benzene		Xe	—		—		—			—		—		—		—	25		100		[91]
Pt/BiVO₄/TiO₂		benzene		Xe	30		—		8			80		—		28		80	—		100		[92]
Pt/LaVO₄/TiO₂		benzene		Xe	30		—		12			70		—		20		70	—		100		[94]
Pt-TiO₂/CeO₂-MnO₂		benzene		UV	—		—		—			—		—		—		—	600		94.5		[95]
Pt-TiO₂/Ce-MnO_x		benzene		germicidal lamps	—		—		—			—		—		—		180	720		100		[96]
TiO₂/CeO₂		benzene		Xe	—		—		—			—		—		—		—	60		82		[63]
Co₃O₄/TiO₂		benzene		UV-vis-IR	RT		40		48			240		40		80		—	40		95		[97]
MnO_x/TiO₂		benzene		Xe	40		40		81			300		40		50		—	40		96.5		[98]
CeMn_xO_y/TiO₂		benzene		Xe	40		—		—			—		—		—		250	20		100		[99]
OMS-2		benzene		Xe	RT		25		18			—		—		—		—	30		100		[100]
Mg-OMS-2		benzene		Xe	—		—		—			202		—		50		220	30		97.2		[101]
Fe-OMS-2		benzene		Xe	—		—		—			224		—		50		217	30		98.8		[102]
Ce-OMS-2		benzene		Xe	RT		20		0			180		—		70		—	20		100		[103]
CeO₂/OMS-2		benzene		Xe	—		—		—			180		—		10		—	20		60		[103]
OMS-2/SnO₂		benzene		UV-vis-IR	—		—		—			225		—		50		—	60		88		[104]
Ag/F-SrTiO₃		benzene		Xe	—		—		—			—		—		—		90	360		>95		[105]
Ag/F-SrTiO₃		toluene		Xe	RT		120		50			90		120		14		90	120		85		[105]
Ag/F-SrTiO₃		xylene		Xe	—		—		—			—		—		—		90	360		>95		[105]
Pd-CeO₂		toluene		Xe	177		—		50			222		—		50		227	—		82		[106]
Pt/γ-Al₂O₃		toluene		simulated sunlight	—		—		—			—		—		—		165	20		87		[107]
Mn, Ce and Co oxides/Al₂O₃		toluene		UV	—		—		—			250		300		61		250	300		84		[108]
SiO₂@Pt@ZrO₂		toluene		Xe	RT		60		18			150		60		80		150	60		100		[110]
Pd-Ag@CeO₂		toluene		Xe	—		—		—			130		—		50		88	—		50		[111]
Ag₃PO₄/Ag/SrTiO₃		toluene		Xe	RT		360		90			90		180		13		90	180		92		[112]
Pt-La₂O₃/TiO₂		toluene		Xe	25		—		85			150		—		25		150	—		100		[113]
Pt-rGO-TiO₂		toluene		IR light	—		—		—			—		—		—		—	—		95		[114]
Pt-Na/TiO₂		toluene		Xe	—		—		—			150		—		31		150	—		82		[115]
Ce-OMS-2		toluene		Xe	—		—		—			—		—		—		—	—		—		[103]
CeO₂/LaMnO₃		toluene		IR light	—		—		—			—		—		—		—	—		89		[116]
NiCo₂O₄		toluene		simulated sunlight	—		—		—			—		—		—		—	—		93		[117]
LaSmMnNiO₆		toluene		Xe	—		—		—			—		—		—		275	—		100		[118]
Au/TiO₂		ethanol		Xe	—		—		—			—		—		—		—	—		—		[119]
Pt/TiO₂		ethanol		UV	—		—		—			200		—		18		200	—		100		[120]
MnO_x-CeO₂		formaldehyde		Xe	25		180		42.3			75		180		27.1		75	180		90.4		[121]
MnO_x/Co₃O₄		formaldehyde		Xe	25		180		20			80		180		36		80	180		84		[122]
graphene/MnO₂		formaldehyde		Xe	—		—		—			—		40		80		—	40		88		[123]
BiOI		formaldehyde		Xe	RT		45		70			60		45		37.8		60	45		88.9		[124]
Pt-TiO₂/SiO₂		formaldehyde		UV	—		—		—			—		—		—		107	300		100		[125]
Cr_xO/TiO₂		acetaldehyde		blue LED	—		—		—			—		—		—		60	120		100		[126]
WO_3-_x		acetaldehyde		UV	—		—		—			—		—		—		60	80		100		[127]
OMS-2		acetone		Xe	—		—		—			—		—		—		—	—		—		[100]
Ce-OMS-2		acetone		Xe	—		—		—			—		—		—		—	—		—		[103]
Pt/CeO₂-MM		acetone		Xe	—		—		—			—		—		—		—	20		95		[91]
nano ZnO		acetone		Hg	—		—		—			—		—		—		240	—		100		[129]
Pt/TiO₂/Silica		ethylene		UV	—		—		—			90		—		34		90	—		100		[120]
Pd/TiO₂/Silica		ethylene		UV	—		—		—			90		—		19.2		90	—		100		[130]
Au/TiO₂/Silica		ethylene		UV	—		—		—			90		—		4.5		90	—		94.9		[130]
SS-Co₃O₄		propylene		Xe	—		—		—			—		—		—		—	10		100		[131]
SS-Co₃O₄		propane		Xe	—		—		—			—		—		—		—	15		100		[131]
manganese oxide		propylene		Xe	—		—		—			—		—		—		205	—		90		[132]
manganese oxide		propane		Xe	—		—		—			—		—		—		263	—		90		[132]
Pt/TiO₂-WO₃		propane		UV/Vis	—		—		—			324		—		70		90	—		70		[133]
PtCu/CeO₂		n-pentane		Xe	30		120		5			400		120		80		400	120		95		[134]
LaMnO₃		styrene		Xe	RT		40		25			140		40		68		140	40		96.6		[135]

Table 1 Summary and comparison of the performance of photocatalytic (PC), thermocatalytic (TC), and PTC degradation of VOCs.

Catalyst	VOCs		Light source			PC activity					TC activity						PTC activity							Ref.
Catalyst	VOCs		Light source			T/°C		t/min		C/%	T/°C		t/min		C/%		T/°C			t/min		C/%		Ref.
Anatase TiO₂ {001}	benzene		Hg			RT		65		42	—		—		—		290			65		78		[70]
Rutile TiO₂	benzene		UV			RT		160		50	280		160		18		280			160		70		[71]
TiO₂	benzene		UV			40		60		40	240		60		15		240			60		100		[72]
0.1 wt% Pt/TiO₂	benzene		UV			—		—		—	240		60		89		240			30		100		[72]
TiO₂	benzene		fluorescent black light bulb			—		—		—	140		300		30		140			300		86		[73]
0.1 wt% Pt/TiO₂	benzene		fluorescent black light bulb			—		—		—	70		120		8		70			120		100		[73]
Zr-doped Pt/TiO₂	benzene		UV			50		150		65	200		150		43		200			150		97		[74]
Pt-loaded TiO₂/ZrO₂	benzene		Germicidal lamps			—		—		—	—		—		—		150			960		100		[75]
MnO₂	benzene		Xe			—		—		—	—		—		—		—			30		100		[77]
Co₃O₄	benzene		Xe			—		—		—	—		—		—		—			40		100		[86]
Mn_xFeO_y-70	benzene		Xe			—		—		—	—		—		—		244			25		100		[87]
Catalyst		VOCs		Light source	PC activity							TC activity						PTC activity					Ref.
Catalyst		VOCs		Light source	T/°C		t/min		C/%			T/°C		t/min		C/%		T/°C	t/min		C/%		Ref.
Pt/CeO₂-MM		benzene		Xe	—		—		—			—		—		—		—	25		100		[91]
Pt/BiVO₄/TiO₂		benzene		Xe	30		—		8			80		—		28		80	—		100		[92]
Pt/LaVO₄/TiO₂		benzene		Xe	30		—		12			70		—		20		70	—		100		[94]
Pt-TiO₂/CeO₂-MnO₂		benzene		UV	—		—		—			—		—		—		—	600		94.5		[95]
Pt-TiO₂/Ce-MnO_x		benzene		germicidal lamps	—		—		—			—		—		—		180	720		100		[96]
TiO₂/CeO₂		benzene		Xe	—		—		—			—		—		—		—	60		82		[63]
Co₃O₄/TiO₂		benzene		UV-vis-IR	RT		40		48			240		40		80		—	40		95		[97]
MnO_x/TiO₂		benzene		Xe	40		40		81			300		40		50		—	40		96.5		[98]
CeMn_xO_y/TiO₂		benzene		Xe	40		—		—			—		—		—		250	20		100		[99]
OMS-2		benzene		Xe	RT		25		18			—		—		—		—	30		100		[100]
Mg-OMS-2		benzene		Xe	—		—		—			202		—		50		220	30		97.2		[101]
Fe-OMS-2		benzene		Xe	—		—		—			224		—		50		217	30		98.8		[102]
Ce-OMS-2		benzene		Xe	RT		20		0			180		—		70		—	20		100		[103]
CeO₂/OMS-2		benzene		Xe	—		—		—			180		—		10		—	20		60		[103]
OMS-2/SnO₂		benzene		UV-vis-IR	—		—		—			225		—		50		—	60		88		[104]
Ag/F-SrTiO₃		benzene		Xe	—		—		—			—		—		—		90	360		>95		[105]
Ag/F-SrTiO₃		toluene		Xe	RT		120		50			90		120		14		90	120		85		[105]
Ag/F-SrTiO₃		xylene		Xe	—		—		—			—		—		—		90	360		>95		[105]
Pd-CeO₂		toluene		Xe	177		—		50			222		—		50		227	—		82		[106]
Pt/γ-Al₂O₃		toluene		simulated sunlight	—		—		—			—		—		—		165	20		87		[107]
Mn, Ce and Co oxides/Al₂O₃		toluene		UV	—		—		—			250		300		61		250	300		84		[108]
SiO₂@Pt@ZrO₂		toluene		Xe	RT		60		18			150		60		80		150	60		100		[110]
Pd-Ag@CeO₂		toluene		Xe	—		—		—			130		—		50		88	—		50		[111]
Ag₃PO₄/Ag/SrTiO₃		toluene		Xe	RT		360		90			90		180		13		90	180		92		[112]
Pt-La₂O₃/TiO₂		toluene		Xe	25		—		85			150		—		25		150	—		100		[113]
Pt-rGO-TiO₂		toluene		IR light	—		—		—			—		—		—		—	—		95		[114]
Pt-Na/TiO₂		toluene		Xe	—		—		—			150		—		31		150	—		82		[115]
Ce-OMS-2		toluene		Xe	—		—		—			—		—		—		—	—		—		[103]
CeO₂/LaMnO₃		toluene		IR light	—		—		—			—		—		—		—	—		89		[116]
NiCo₂O₄		toluene		simulated sunlight	—		—		—			—		—		—		—	—		93		[117]
LaSmMnNiO₆		toluene		Xe	—		—		—			—		—		—		275	—		100		[118]
Au/TiO₂		ethanol		Xe	—		—		—			—		—		—		—	—		—		[119]
Pt/TiO₂		ethanol		UV	—		—		—			200		—		18		200	—		100		[120]
MnO_x-CeO₂		formaldehyde		Xe	25		180		42.3			75		180		27.1		75	180		90.4		[121]
MnO_x/Co₃O₄		formaldehyde		Xe	25		180		20			80		180		36		80	180		84		[122]
graphene/MnO₂		formaldehyde		Xe	—		—		—			—		40		80		—	40		88		[123]
BiOI		formaldehyde		Xe	RT		45		70			60		45		37.8		60	45		88.9		[124]
Pt-TiO₂/SiO₂		formaldehyde		UV	—		—		—			—		—		—		107	300		100		[125]
Cr_xO/TiO₂		acetaldehyde		blue LED	—		—		—			—		—		—		60	120		100		[126]
WO_3-_x		acetaldehyde		UV	—		—		—			—		—		—		60	80		100		[127]
OMS-2		acetone		Xe	—		—		—			—		—		—		—	—		—		[100]
Ce-OMS-2		acetone		Xe	—		—		—			—		—		—		—	—		—		[103]
Pt/CeO₂-MM		acetone		Xe	—		—		—			—		—		—		—	20		95		[91]
nano ZnO		acetone		Hg	—		—		—			—		—		—		240	—		100		[129]
Pt/TiO₂/Silica		ethylene		UV	—		—		—			90		—		34		90	—		100		[120]
Pd/TiO₂/Silica		ethylene		UV	—		—		—			90		—		19.2		90	—		100		[130]
Au/TiO₂/Silica		ethylene		UV	—		—		—			90		—		4.5		90	—		94.9		[130]
SS-Co₃O₄		propylene		Xe	—		—		—			—		—		—		—	10		100		[131]
SS-Co₃O₄		propane		Xe	—		—		—			—		—		—		—	15		100		[131]
manganese oxide		propylene		Xe	—		—		—			—		—		—		205	—		90		[132]
manganese oxide		propane		Xe	—		—		—			—		—		—		263	—		90		[132]
Pt/TiO₂-WO₃		propane		UV/Vis	—		—		—			324		—		70		90	—		70		[133]
PtCu/CeO₂		n-pentane		Xe	30		120		5			400		120		80		400	120		95		[134]
LaMnO₃		styrene		Xe	RT		40		25			140		40		68		140	40		96.6		[135]

Fig. 3. (a) Change in benzene concentration with time; (b) CO2 production rate from benzene in photocatalytic, thermocatalytic, and photothermocatalytic systems. Reprinted with permission from Ref. [70]. Copyright (2016) Elsevier.

Fig. 5. Scanning electron microscopy images (a,b) and high-resolution transmission electron microscopy image (c) of R-MnO2-HS; (d) CO2 concentration and benzene conversion (concentration/initial concentration (C/C0)) over R-MnO2-HS and TiO2 (P25) catalysts under full solar spectrum irradiation. Reprinted with permission from Ref. [77]. Copyright (2019) American Chemical Society.

Fig. 6. Schematic of photothermal synergistic catalysis for benzene oxidation on the Pt/LaVO4/TiO2 catalyst.

Fig. 7. Schematic of photothermal synergistic catalysis for benzene oxidation over TiO2/CeO2 (a) and Co3O4/TiO2 (b) catalysts. (a) Reprinted with permission from Ref. [63]. Copyright 2015, American Chemical Society; (b) Reprinted with permission from Ref. [97]. Copyright (2018) American Chemical Society.

Fig. 8. Schematic of photothermal synergistic catalysis over the OMS-2 catalyst. Reprinted with permission from Ref. [100]. Copyright (2015) Elsevier.

Fig. 9. (a) UV-vis absorption spectra of the catalysts; (b) Schematic illustration of photothermal synergistic catalysis for VOCs on Ag/F-codoped SrTiO3 catalysts. Reprinted with permission from Ref. [105]. Copyright (2018) American Chemical Society.

Fig. 10. Schematic of photothermal synergistic catalysis for VOCs degradation over a Pt/γ-Al2O3 catalyst. Reprinted with permission from Ref. [107]. Copyright (2018) American Chemical Society.

Fig. 11. (a) Synthesis of core/shell SiO2@Pt@ZrO2 nanostructures; (b) High-resolution transmission electron microscopy image of the SiO2@Pt@ZrO2 catalyst; (c) Schematic of photothermal synergistic catalysis over the SiO2@Pt@ZrO2 catalyst for VOCs removal. Reprinted with permission from Ref. [110]. Copyright (2019) American Chemical Society.

Fig. 12. Schematic of photothermal synergistic catalytic VOCs degradation over the Ag3PO4/Ag/SrTiO3 catalyst. Reprinted with permission from Ref. [112]. Copyright (2019) American Chemical Society.

Fig. 13. Schematic of the photothermal synergistic catalytic degradation of VOCs over the Pt-rGO-TiO2 catalyst. Reprinted with permission from Ref. [114]. Copyright (2018) Elsevier.

Fig. 14. (a) UV-vis diffuse reflectance spectroscopy spectra of the prepared samples; (b) Toluene conversion over the ACo2O4 catalysts under simulated sunlight irradiation. Reprinted with permission from Ref. [117]. Copyright (2019) Elsevier.

Fig. 15. Schematic of photothermal synergistic catalysis for ethanol oxidation over the Au/TiO2 catalyst. Reprinted with permission from Ref. [119]. Copyright (2016) American Chemical Society.

Fig. 16. (a) Change in CO2 concentration during the photothermocatalytic degradation of formaldehyde over CoxMny catalysts at 40 °C; (b) Formaldehyde degradation rates under different reaction conditions over Co1Mn1 catalyst. Reprinted with permission from Ref. [122]. Copyright (2016) Elsevier.

Fig. 17. Schematic of photothermal synergistic catalysis for ethanol oxidation on the WO3-x catalyst. Reprinted with permission from Ref. [127]. Copyright (2017) Elsevier.

Fig. 18. Schematic of photothermal synergistic catalysis for VOCs oxidation on the PtCu/CeO2 catalyst. Reprinted with permission from Ref. [134]. Copyright (2019) Elsevier.

Fig. 19. Electron transfer and Fermi level of the Au/TiO2-C3N4 catalyst under visible light irradiation. Reprinted with permission from Ref. [140]. Copyright (2016) Royal Society of Chemistry.

Fig. 20. Schematic of photothermal synergistic catalysis for CO methanation on Ru/TiO2 catalyst under the UV light irradiation. Reprinted with permission from Ref. [142]. Copyright (2014) Elsevier.

Fig. 21. Schematic of photothermal synergistic catalytic FTS on the Ru/graphene catalyst. Reprinted with permission from Ref. [145]. Copyright (2015) American Chemical Society.

Fig. 22. Reaction route for photothermal synergistic catalytic CO oxidation over the Pd/CeO2 catalyst under visible light illumination. Reprinted with permission from Ref. [106]. Copyright (2016) American Chemical Society.

Fig. 23. Scheme 1. Applications of photothermal synergistic catalysis for the efficient removal of VOCs. PTC: photothermal synergistic catalysis.

Fig. 24. Scheme 2. Applications of photothermal synergistic catalysis for efficient removal of CO.

参考文献

[1]	K. Vikrant, K. H. Kim, W. X. Peng, S. B. Ge, Y. S. Ok, Chem. Eng. J., 2020,387, 123943.
[2]	W. X. Zou, B. Gao, Y. S. Ok, L. Dong, Chemosphere, 2019,218, 845-859.
[3]	Z. Shayegan, F. Haghighat, C. S. Lee, Chem. Eng. J., 2019,357, 533-546.
[4]	Y. Lyu, C. T. Li, X. Y. Du, Y. C. Zhu, Y. D. Zhang, S. H. Li, Fuel, 2020,262, 116610.
[5]	J. Lee, J. Lee, S. H. Lim, J. Hazard. Mater., 2020,392, 122145.
[6]	C. Q. Li, Z. M. Sun, A. K. Song, X. B. Dong, S. L. Zheng, D. D. Dionysiou, Appl. Catal. B, 2018,236, 76-87.
[7]	D. Wang, L. Nie, X. Shao, H. B. Yu, Sci. Total Environ., 2017, 603-604, 57-65.
[8]	P. Zhao, Y. H. Cheng, C. C. Lin, Y. L. Cheng, Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res., 2016,23, 3799-3808.
[9]	F. J. Lu, S. H. Li, B. X. Shen, J. W. Zhang, L. J. Liu, X. Q. Shen, R. X. Zhao, J. Hazard. Mater., 2020,384, 121428.
[10]	T. Guo, X. S. Li, J. Q. Li, Z. Peng, L. Xu, J. G. Dong, P. Cheng, Z. Zhou, Chemosphere, 2018,194, 139-146.
[11]	Z. X. Zhang, Z. Jiang, W. F. Shangguan, Catal. Today, 2016,264, 270-278.
[12]	V. T. D Hien, C. Lin, V. C. Thanh, N. T. K. Oanh, B. X. Thanh, C. E. Weng, C. S. Yuan, E. R. Rene, J. Environ. Manage., 2019,247, 401-412.
[13]	S. H. Zhang, J. P. You, C. Kennes, Z. W. Cheng, J. X. Ye, D. Z. Chen, J. M. Chen, L. D. Wang, Chem. Eng. J., 2018,334, 2625-2637.
[14]	Y. J. Shu, M. He, J. Ji, H. B. Huang, S. W. Liu, D. Y. C Leung, J. Hazard. Mater., 2019,364, 770-779.
[15]	R. Gao, D. P. Yan, Chem. Commun., 2017,53, 5408-5411.
[16]	V. K. Tomera, S. Duhan, J. Mater. Chem. A, 2016,4, 1033-1043.
[17]	Y. J. Shu, Y. Xu, H. B. Huang, J. Ji, S. M. Liang, M .Y. Wu, D. Y. C. Leung, Chemosphere, 2018,208, 550-558.
[18]	A. Fujishima, K. Honda, Nature, 1972,238, 37-38.
[19]	X. Li, C. Y. Liu, D. Y. Wu, J. Z. Li, P. W. Huo, H. Q. Wang, Chin. J. Catal., 2019,40, 928-939.
[20]	L. F. Wei, C. L. Yu, Q. H. Zhang, H. Liu, Y. Wang, J. Mater. Chem. A, 2018,6, 22411-22436.
[21]	S. J. Xie, Y. Wang, Q. H. Zhang, W. P. Deng, Y. Wang, Chem. Commun., 2015,51, 3430-3433.
[22]	Q. G. Zhai, S. J. Xie, W. Q. Fan, Q. H. Zhang, Y. Wang, W. P. Deng, Y. Wang, Angew. Chem. Int. Ed., 2013,52, 5776-5779.
[23]	S. B. Wang, B. Y. Guan, X. W. D Lou, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2018,140, 5037-5040.
[24]	R. Long, Y. Li, Y. Liu, S. M. Chen, X. S. Zheng, C. Gao, C. H. He, N. S. Chen, Z. M. Qi, L. Song, J. Jiang, J. F. Zhu, Y. J. Xiong, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2017,139, 4486-4492.
[25]	Y. X. Pan, Y. You, S. Xin, Y .T. Li, G. T. Fu, Z. M. Cui, Y. L. Men, F. F. Cao, S. H. Yu, J. B. Goodenough, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2017,139, 4123-4129.
[26]	X. Li, J. G. Yu, M. Jaronie, X. B. Chen, Chem. Rev., 2019,119, 3962-4179.
[27]	Z. Li, Y. Qi, W. Y. Wang, D. Li, Z. Li, Y. A. Xiao, G. Y. Han, J. R. Shen, C. Li, Chin. J. Catal., 2019,40, 486-494.
[28]	L. C. Wang, S. Cao, K. Guo, Z. J. Wu, Z. Ma, L. Y. Piao, Chin. J. Catal., 2019,40, 470-475.
[29]	X. M. Xiang, L. J. Chou, X. H. Li, Chin. J. Catal., 2018,39, 407-412.
[30]	W. J. Zhang, Y. Hu, C. Z. Yan, D. C. Hong, R. P. Chen, X. L. Xue, S. Y. Yang, Y. X. Tian, Z. X. Tie, Z. Jin, Nanoscale, 2019,11, 9053-9060.
[31]	J. X. Xu, Y. H. Qi, C. Wang, L. Wang, Appl. Catal. B, 2019,241, 178-186.
[32]	S. S. Chen, T. Hisatomi, G. J. Ma, Z. Wang, Z. H. Pan, T. Takata, K. Domen, Chin. J. Catal., 2019,40, 1668-1672.
[33]	J. Yuan, J. Wen, Y. Zhong, X. Li, Y. Fang, S. Zhang, W. Liu, J. Mater. Chem. A, 2015,3, 18244-18255.
[34]	R. B. Wei, Z. L. Huang, G. H. Gu, Z. Wang, L. X. Zeng, Y. B. Chen, Z. Q. Liu, Appl. Catal. B, 2018,231, 101-107.
[35]	Y. J. Xiao, X. Y. Guo, J. X. Liu, L. F. Liu, F. X. Zhang, C. Li, Chin. J. Catal., 2019,40, 1339-1344.
[36]	N. C. Zheng, T. Ouyang, Y. B. Chen, Z. Wang, D. Y. Chen, Z. Q. Liu, Catal. Sci. Technol., 2019,9, 1357-1364.
[37]	Y. J. Wang, Y. Li, S. W. Cao, J. G. Yu, Chin. J. Catal., 2019,40, 867-874.
[38]	H. Wang, X. M. Wang, R. T. Chen, H. F. Zhang, X. L. Wang, J. H. Wang, J. Zhang, L. C. Mu, K. F. Wu, F. T. Fan, X. Zong, C. Li, ACS Energy Lett., 2019,4, 40-47.
[39]	X. M. Wang, W. G. Ma, Z. Q. Xu, H. Wang, W. J. Fan, X. Zong, C. Li, Nano Energy, 2018,48, 500-509.
[40]	X. Zong, H. J. Yan, G. P. Wu, G. J. Ma, F. Y. Wen, L. Wang, C. Li, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2008,130, 7176-7177.
[41]	P. Chen, H. Wang, H. J. Liu, Z. L. Ni, J. Y. Li, Y. Zhou, F. Dong, Appl. Catal. B, 2019,242, 19-30.
[42]	X. J. Zou, C. Y. Yuan, Y. Y. Dong, H. Ge, J. Ke, Y. B. Cui, Chem. Eng. J., 2020,379, 122380.
[43]	Y. X. Ji, A. Mattsson, G. A. Niklasson, C. G. Granqvist, L. Österlund, Joule, 2019,3, 2457-2471.
[44]	R. Y. Zhang, T. Ran, Y. H. Cao, L. Q. Ye, F. Dong, Q. Zhang, L. Z. Yuan, Y. Zhou, Chem. Eng. J., 2020,382, 123029.
[45]	A. H. Mamaghani, F. Haghighat, C. S. Lee, J. Photochem. Photobiol. A, 2019,378, 156-170.
[46]	C. L. Yu, H. B. He, X. Q. Liu, J. L. Zeng, Z. Liu, Chin. J. Catal., 2019,40, 1212-1221.
[47]	K. Yang, X. X. Li, D. B. Zeng, F. Y. Chen, C. L. Yu, K. L. Zhang, W. Y. Huang, Chin. J. Catal., 2019,40, 796-818.
[48]	J. F. Li, C. Y. Zhong, J. R. Huang, Y. B. Chen, Z. Wang, Z. Q. Liu, J. Colloid Interface Sci., 2019,553, 758-767.
[49]	S. He, K. Xiao, X. Z. Chen, T. Li, T. Ouyang, Z. Wang, M. L. Guo, Z. Q. Liu, J. Colloid Interface Sci., 2019,557, 644-654.
[50]	C. L. Yu, D. B. Zeng, Q. Z. Fan, K. Yang, J. L. Zeng, L. F. Wei, J. H. Yi, H. B. Ji, Environ. Sci.: Nano, 2020,7, 286-303.
[51]	D. B. Zeng, K. Yang, C. L. Yu, F. Y. Chen, X. X. Li, Z. Wu, H. Liu, Appl. Catal. B, 2018,237, 449-463.
[52]	M. R. Shariati, A. Samadi-Maybodi, A. H. Colagar, J. Mater. Chem. A, 2018,6, 20433-20443.
[53]	Z. B. Xiang, Y. Wang, P. Ju, Y. Long, D. Zhang, J. Alloys Compd., 2017,721, 622-627.
[54]	J. T. Zhang, X. Liu, X. Y. Wang, L. L. Mu, M. M. Yuan, B. K. Liu, H. Z. Shi, J. Hazard. Mater., 2018,359, 1-8.
[55]	Y. B. Jin, J. T. Long, X. Ma, T. H. Zhou, Z. Z. Zhang, H. X. Lin, J. L. Long, X. X. Wang, Appl. Catal. B, 2019,256, 117873.
[56]	S. M. Lam, J. A. Quek, J. C. Sin, J. Photochem. Photobiol. A, 2018,353, 171-184.
[57]	J. Ji, Y. Xu, H. B. Huang, M. He, S. L. Liu, G. Y. Liu, R. J. Xie, Q. Y. Feng, Y. J. Shu, Y. J. Zhan, R. M. Fang, X. G. Ye, D. Y. C Leung, Chem. Eng. J., 2017,327, 490-499.
[58]	Z. B. Rui, X. Q. Yang, J. F. Chen, H. B. Ji, CIESC Journal, 2018,69, 4947-4958.
[59]	D. S. Selishchev, N. S. Kolobov, A. A. Pershin, D. V. Kozlov, Appl. Catal. B, 2017,200, 503-513.
[60]	W. Han, J. G. Deng, S. H. Xie, H. G. Yang, H. X. Dai, C. T. Au, Ind. Eng. Chem. Res., 2014,53, 3486-3494.
[61]	S. Zhao, K. Z. Li, S. Jiang, J. H. Li, Appl. Catal. B, 2016,181, 236-248.
[62]	K. Yang, Y. J. Zhang, C. Meng, F. F. Cao, X. Chen, X. Z. Fu, D. W. Dai, C. L. Yu, Appl. Surf. Sci., 2017,391, 635-644.
[63]	M. Zeng, Y. Z. Li, M. Y. Mao, J. L. Bai, L. Ren, X. J. Zhao, ACS Catal., 2015,5, 3278-3286.
[64]	J. Chen, Z. S. Chen, X. Y. Zhang, X. F. Li, L. H. Yu, D. Z. Li, Appl. Catal. B, 2017,210, 379-385.
[65]	M. B. H Abadia, H. Shirkhanloob, J. Rakhtshahc, Arab. J. Chem., 2020,13, 1741-1751.
[66]	H. X. Wen, L. Y. Yuan, C. X. Wei, Y. Zhao, Y. Qian, P. Ma, S. M. Ding, X. Yang, X. L. Wang, Environ. Toxicol. Phar., 2016,45, 265-273.
[67]	K. Li, B. Peng, T. Peng, ACS Catal., 2016,6, 7485-7527.
[68]	W. Yuan, L. Cheng, Y. An, S. Lv, H. Wu, X. Fan, Y. Zhang, X. Guo, J. Tang, Adv. Sci., 2018,5, 1700870.
[69]	M. Ge, C. Cao, J. Huang, S. Li, Z. Chen, K. Zhang, S. S Al-Deyabd, Y. Lai, J. Mater. Chem. A, 2016,4, 6772-6801.
[70]	L. Ren, M. Y. Mao, Y. Z. Li, L. Lan, Z. Zhang, X. J. Zhao, Appl. Catal. B, 2016,198, 303-310.
[71]	X. X. Wang, D. W. Zeng, C. S. Xie, Mater. Lett., 2015,139, 336-339.
[72]	Y. Z. Li, J. C. Huang, T. Peng, J. Xu, X. J. Zhao, ChemCatChem, 2010,2, 1082-1087.
[73]	X. Z. Fu, W. A. Zeltner, M. A. Anderson, Appl. Catal. B, 1995,6, 209-224.
[74]	G. P. Wang, W. Qiu, C. J. Ren, J. J. Chai, W. Dong, Y. Q. Chen, M. C. Gong, Chin. J. Catal., 2009,30, 913-918.
[75]	C. J. Ren, X. J. Liu, G. P. Wang, S. Miao, Y. Q. Chen, J. Mol. Catal. A, 2012,358, 31-37.
[76]	J. T. Hou, L. L. Liu, Y. Z. Li, M. Y. Mao, H. Q. Lv, X. J. Zhao, Environ. Sci. Technol., 2013,47, 13730-13736.
[77]	Y. Yang, Y. Z. Li, M. Y. Mao, M. Zeng, X. J. Zhao, ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces, 2017,9, 2350-2357.
[78]	C. Gao, Q. Q. Meng, K. Zhao, H. J. Yin, D. W. Wang, J. Guo, S. L. Zhao, L. Chang, M. He, Q. X. Li, H. J. Zhao, X. J. Huang, Y. Gao, Z. Y. Tang, Adv. Mater., 2016,28, 6485-6490.
[79]	L. Wang, J. W. Wan, Y. S. Zhao, N. L. Yang, D. Wang, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2019,141, 2238-2241.
[80]	W. Y. Chen, B. Han, C. Tian, X. M. Liu, S. J. Liang, H. Deng, Z. Lin, Appl. Catal. B, 2019,244, 996-1003.
[81]	A. Gasparotto, D. Barreca, D. Bekermann, A. Devi, R. A. Fischer, P. Fornasiero, V. Gombac, O. I. Lebedev, C. Maccato, T. Montini, G. V. Tendeloo, E. Tondello, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2011,133, 19362-19365.
[82]	J. Liu, J. Ke, Y. Li, B. J. Liu, L. D. Wang, H. N. Xiao, S. B. Wang, Appl. Catal. B, 2018,236, 396-403.
[83]	X. W. Xie, Y. Li, Z. Q. Liu, M. Haruta, W. J. Shen, Nature, 2009,458, 746-749.
[84]	L. H. Hu, Q. Peng, Y. D. Li, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2008,130, 16136-16137.
[85]	X. Y. Wang, Y. Liu, T. H. Zhang, Y. J. Luo, Z. X. Lan, K. Zhang, J. C. Zuo, L. L. Jiang, R. H. Wang, ACS Catal., 2017,7, 1626-1636.
[86]	L. Lan, Z. K. Shi, Q. Zhang, Y. Z. Li, Y. Yang, S. W. Wu, X. J. Zhao, J. Mater. Chem. A, 2018,6, 7194-7205.
[87]	C. Chen, Y. Z. Li, Y. Yang, Q. Zhang, J. C. Wu, X. Xie, Z. K. Shi, X. J. Zhao, Environ. Sci.: Nano, 2019,6, 1233-1245.
[88]	D. Kumar, A. Lee, T. Lee, M. Lim, D. K. Lim, Nano Lett., 2016,16, 1760-1767.
[89]	B. H. Wu, D. Y. Liu, S. Mubeen, T. T. Chuong, M. Moskovits, G. D. Stucky, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2016,138, 1114-1117.
[90]	J. S. Duchene, B. C. Sweeny, A. C Johnston-Peck, D. Su, E. A. Stach, W. D. Wei, Angew. Chem. Int. Ed., 2014,53, 7887-7891.
[91]	M. Y. Mao, Y. Z. Li, H. Q. Lv, J. T. Hou, M. Zeng, L. Ren, H. Huang, X. J. Zhao, Environ. Sci.: Nano, 2017,4, 373-384.
[92]	J. L. Fang, Z. S. Chen, Q. Zheng, D. Z. Li, Catal. Sci. Technol., 2017,7, 3303-3311.
[93]	H. Huang, D. Li, Q. Lin, W. Zhang, Y. Shao, Y. Chen, M. Sun, X. Fu, Environ. Sci. Technol., 2009,43, 4164.
[94]	J. L. Fang, D. Z. Li, Y. Shao, J. H. Hu, J. Mater. Chem. A, 2016,4, 14213-14221.
[95]	C. J. Ren, T. Zou, G. Q. Chen, Y. Q. Chen, M. C. Gong, Chin. J. Catal., 2006,27, 1048-1050.
[96]	C. J. Ren, L. N. Zhou, Y. W. Duan, Y. Q. Chen, J. Rare Earths, 2012,30, 1106-1111.
[97]	Z. K. Shi, L. Lan, Y. Z. Li, Y. Yang, Q. Zhang, J. C. Wu, G .Q. Zhang, X. J. Zhao, ACS Sustainable Chem. Eng., 2018,6, 16503-16514.
[98]	Y. Ma, Y. Z. Li, M. Y. Mao, J. T. Hou, M. Zeng, X. J. Zhao, J. Mater. Chem. A, 2015,3, 5509-5516.
[99]	H. H. Liu, Y. Z. Li, Y. Yang, M. Y. Mao, M. Zeng, L. Lan, L. Yun, X. J. Zhao, J. Mater. Chem. A, 2016,4, 9890-9899.
[100]	M. Y. Mao, Y. Z. Li, J. T. Hou, M. Zeng, X. J. Zhao, Appl. Catal. B, 2015, 174-175, 496-503.
[101]	S. M. Fang, Y. Z. Li, Y. Yang, J. Chen, H. H. Liu, X. J. Zhao, Environ. Sci.: Nano, 2017,4, 1798-1807.
[102]	J. Chen, Y. Z. Li, S. M. Fang, Y. Yang, X. J. Zhao, Chem. Eng. J., 2018,332, 205-215.
[103]	J. T. Hou, Y. Z. Li, M. Y. Mao, Y. Z. Yue, G. N. Greaves, X. J. Zhao, Nanoscale, 2015,7, 2633-2640.
[104]	X. Xie, Y. Z. Li, Y. Yang, C. Chen, Q. Zhang, Appl. Surf. Sci., 2018,462, 590-597.
[105]	W. K. Ji, T. Shen, J. J. Kong, Z. B. Rui, Y. X. Tong, Ind. Eng. Chem. Res., 2018,57, 12766-12773.
[106]	J. S. Zou, Z. C. Si, Y. D. Cao, R. Ran, X. D. Wu, D. Weng, J. Phys. Chem. C, 2016,120, 29116-29125.
[107]	S. C. Cai, J. J. Li, E. Q. Yu, X. Chen, J. Chen, H. P. Jia, ACS Appl. Nano Mater., 2018,1, 6368-6377.
[108]	E. Akarsu, E. Arpaç, J. Hazard. Mater., 2019,365, 331-339.
[109]	S. Hu, B. J.Liu, J. M. Feng, C. Zong, K. Q. Lin, X. Wang, D. Y. Wu, B. Ren, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2018,140, 13680-13686.
[110]	C. L. Jiang, H. Wang, S. Z. Lin, F. Ma, Y. Q. Wang, H. B. Ji, Ind. Eng. Chem. Res., 2019,58, 16450-16458.
[111]	J. Gao, Z. C. Si, Y. F. Xu, L. P. Liu, Y. Y. Zhang, X. D. Wu, R. Ran, D. Weng, J. Phys. Chem. C, 2019,123, 1761-1769.
[112]	W. K. Ji, Z. B. Rui, H. B. Ji, Ind. Eng. Chem. Res., 2019,58, 13950-13959.
[113]	X. Zhong, J. Sun, S. X. Liu, J. Inorg. Mater., 2011,26, 1175-1180.
[114]	J. J. Li, S. C. Cai, E. Q. Yu, B. Weng, X. Chen, J. Chen, H. P. Jia, Y. J. Xu, Appl. Catal. B, 2018,233, 260-271.
[115]	Y. Y. Zhang, Z. S. Si, J. Gao, Y. X. Liu, L. P. Liu, X. D. Wu, R. Ran, D. Weng, Appl. Surf. Sci., 2019,469, 246-252.
[116]	J. J. Li, E. Q. Yu, S. C. Cai, X. Chen, J. Chen, H. P. Jia, Y. J. Xu, Appl. Catal. B, 2019,240, 141-152.
[117]	X. Chen, S. C. Cai, E. Q. Yu, J. J. Li, J. Chen, H. P. Jia, Appl. Surf. Sci., 2019,484, 479-488.
[118]	Y. R. Tang, Y. W. Tao, Q. Wang, Z. R. Zhu, W. Q. Zhang, X. Li, A. J. Xie, S. P. Luo, J. Mater. Res., 2019,34, 3439-3449.
[119]	T. H. Tan, J. Scott, Y. H. Ng, R. A. Taylor, K. F Aguey-Zinsou, R. Amal, ACS Catal., 2016,6, 1870-1879.
[120]	J. C Kennedy III, A. K. Datye, J. Catal., 1998,179, 375-389.
[121]	D. Jiang, W. Z. Wang, L. Zhang, R. H. Qiu, S. M. Sun, Y. L. Zheng, Appl. Catal. B, 2015,165, 399-407.
[122]	Y. L. Zheng, W. Z. Wang, D. Jiang, L. Zhang, Chem. Eng. J., 2016,284, 21-27.
[123]	J. L. Wang, G. K. Zhang, P. Y. Zhang, Appl. Catal. B, 2018,239, 77-85.
[124]	Y. C. Huang, H. X. Hu, S. X. Wang, M. S. Balogun, H. B. Ji, Y. X. Tong, Appl. Catal. B, 2017,218, 700-708.
[125]	K. Nakano, E. Obuchi, M. Nanri, Chem. Eng. Res. Des., 2004,82, 297-301.
[126]	X. F. Peng, C. H. Wang, Y. Y. Li, H. Ma, F. Yu, G. S. Che, J. Y. Yan, X. T. Zhang, Y. C. Liu, Catal. Today, 2019,335, 286-293.
[127]	Y. Y. Li, C. C. Wang, H. Zheng, F. X. Wan, F. Yu, X. T. Zhang, Y. C. Liu, Appl. Surf. Sci., 2017,391, 654-661.
[128]	L. Luo, Y. Z. Li, J. T. Hou, Y. Yang, Appl. Surf. Sci., 2014,319, 332-338.
[129]	W. Xie, Y. Z. Li, W. Q. Shi, L. Zhao, X. J. Zhao, P. F. Fang, F. Zheng, S. J. Wang, Chem. Eng. J., 2012,213, 218-224.
[130]	C. Hu, L. Y. Lin, X. X. Hu, J. Environ. Sci., 2006,18, 76-82.
[131]	Y. L. Zheng, W. Z. Wang, D. Jiang, L. Zhang, X. M. Li, Z. Wang, J. Mater. Chem. A, 2016,4, 105-112.
[132]	Y. L. Zheng, W. Z. Wang, D. Jiang, L. Zhang, X. M. Li, Z. Wang, Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys., 2016,18, 18180-18186.
[133]	L. L. Kang, X. Y. Liu, A. Q. Wang, L. Li, Y. J. Ren, X. Y. Li, X. L. Pan, Y. Y. Li, X. Zong, H. Liu, A. I. Frenkel, T. Zhang, Angew. Chem. Int. Ed., 2020,59, 12909-12916.
[134]	J. J. Kong, G. Y. Li, M. C. Wen, J. Y. Chen, H. L. Liu, T. C. An, J. Catal., 2019,370, 88-96.
[135]	J. Y. Chen, Z. G. He, G. Y. Li, T. C. An, H. X. Shi, Y. Z. Li, Appl. Catal. B, 2017,209, 146-154.
[136]	H. X. Zhong, Y. Wei, Y. Z. Yue, L. H. Zhang, Y. Liu, Nanotechnology, 2016,27, 135701.
[137]	J. Xu, X. M. Li, X. Wu, W. Z. Wang, R. Fan, X. K. Liu, H. L. Xu, J. Phys. Chem. C, 2016,120, 12666-12672.
[138]	Z. R. Lou, D. C. Yuan, F. Y. Zhang, Y. C. Wang, Y. G. Li, L. P. Zhu, Nano Energy, 2019,62, 653-659.
[139]	F. Liu, M. Zeng, Y. Z. Li, Y. Yang, M. Y. Mao, X. J. Zhao, Adv. Funct. Mater., 2016,26, 4518-4526.
[140]	K. Yang, C. Meng, L. L. Lin, X. Y. Peng, X. Chen, X. X. Wang, W. X. Dai, X. Z. Fu, Catal. Sci. Technol., 2016,6, 829-839.
[141]	R. A. Dagle, Y. Wang, G. G. Xia, J. J. Strohm, J. Holladay, D. R. Palo, Appl. Catal. A, 2007,326, 213-218.
[142]	X. H. Lin, K. Yang, R. R. Si, X. Chen, W. X. Dai, X. Z. Fu, Appl. Catal. B, 2014,147, 585-591.
[143]	X. H. Lin, L. L. Lin, K. Huang, X. Chen, W. X. Dai, X. Z. Fu, Appl. Catal. B, 2015, 168-169, 416-422.
[144]	K. Cheng, B. Gu, X. L. Liu, J. C. Kang, Q. H. Zhang, Y. Wang, Angew. Chem. Int. Ed., 2016,55, 4725-4728.
[145]	X. N. Guo, Z. F. Jiao, G. Q. Jin, X. Y. Guo, ACS Catal., 2015,5, 3836-3840.
[146]	Y. S. Wang, Y. F. Zhao, J. J. Liu, Z. H. Li, G. I. N Waterhouse, R. Shi, X. D. Wen, T. R. Zhang, Adv. Energy Mater., 2020,10, 1902860.
[147]	S. Y. Yu, T. Zhang, Y. H. Xie, Q. H. Wang, X. C. Gao, R. F. Zhang, Y. L. Zhang, H. Q. Su, Int. J. Hydrogen Energy, 2015,40, 870-877.

光热协同催化去除挥发性有机化合物和CO的研究进展

Recent advances in VOCs and CO removal via photothermal synergistic catalysis

RichHTML

PDF

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

扫码分享

图/表 25

参考文献

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

[1]	赵彬彬, 钟威, 陈峰, 王苹, 别传彪, 余火根. 高晶化g-C₃N₄光催化剂: 合成、结构调控和光催化产氢[J]. 催化学报, 2023, 52(9): 127-143.
[2]	唐小龙, 李锋, 李方, 江燕斌, 余长林. 单原子催化剂在光催化和电催化合成过氧化氢中的研究进展[J]. 催化学报, 2023, 52(9): 79-98.
[3]	胡金念, 田玲婵, 王海燕, 孟洋, 梁锦霞, 朱纯, 李隽. MXene负载3d金属单原子高效氮还原电催化剂的理论筛选[J]. 催化学报, 2023, 52(9): 252-262.
[4]	蔡铭洁, 刘艳萍, 董珂欣, 陈晓波, 李世杰. 漂浮型Bi₂WO₆/C₃N₄/碳布S型异质结光催化材料用于高效净化水体环境[J]. 催化学报, 2023, 52(9): 239-251.
[5]	高晖, 张恭, 程东方, 王永涛, 赵静, 李晓芝, 杜晓伟, 赵志坚, 王拓, 张鹏, 巩金龙. 构建Cu台阶位促进电催化CO₂还原制醇类化学品的研究[J]. 催化学报, 2023, 52(9): 187-195.
[6]	王思恺, 闵祥婷, 乔波涛, 颜宁, 张涛. 单原子催化: 追寻催化领域的“圣杯”[J]. 催化学报, 2023, 52(9): 1-13.
[7]	张雯, 宋彩彩, 王嘉蔚, 蔡舒婷, 高梦语, 冯有祥, 鲁统部. 双向主客体作用促进水溶液中选择性光催化CO₂还原与醇氧化[J]. 催化学报, 2023, 52(9): 176-186.
[8]	江梓聪, 程蓓, 张留洋, 张振翼, 别传彪. 氧化锌基梯型异质结光催化剂[J]. 催化学报, 2023, 52(9): 32-49.
[9]	赵磊, 张震, 朱昭昭, 李平波, 蒋金霞, 杨婷婷, 熊佩, 安旭光, 牛晓滨, 齐学强, 陈俊松, 吴睿. 缺陷氮掺杂碳耦合Co-N₅单原子位点用于高效锌-空气电池[J]. 催化学报, 2023, 51(8): 216-224.
[10]	刘博文, 蔡家杰, 张建军, 谭海燕, 程蓓, 许景三. MOF/CdS梯型光催化剂同时进行苯甲醇氧化和析氢反应及其机理研究[J]. 催化学报, 2023, 51(8): 204-215.
[11]	宋明明, 宋相海, 刘鑫, 周伟强, 霍鹏伟. ZnIn₂S₄/MOF-808微球结构S型异质结光催化剂的制备及其光还原CO₂性能研究[J]. 催化学报, 2023, 51(8): 180-192.
[12]	邵秀丽, 李可, 李静萍, 程强, 王国宏, 王楷. 揭示NiS@Ta₂O₅纳米纤维中梯型电荷转移路径及光催化CO₂转化性能[J]. 催化学报, 2023, 51(8): 193-203.
[13]	殷楠, 陈伟斌, 杨勇, 唐钲, 李攀杰, 张潇月, 唐兰勤, 王天宇, 王阳, 周勇, 邹志刚. 具有高效激子解离和明确反应位点的Tröger碱基三维多孔芳基有机骨架及其光催化近单一选择性CO₂转化[J]. 催化学报, 2023, 51(8): 168-179.
[14]	李嘉明, 李源, 王小田, 杨直雄, 张高科. TiO₂上原子分散的Fe位点促进光催化CO₂还原: 增强的催化活性、 DFT计算和机制洞察[J]. 催化学报, 2023, 51(8): 145-156.
[15]	阎菲, 张由子, 刘思碧, 邹睿卿, Jahan B Ghasemi, 李炫华. 供体-受体型卟啉基金属有机框架实现有效电荷分离高效光催化析氢[J]. 催化学报, 2023, 51(8): 124-134.