镓离子掺杂和硫空位调控的In2S3增强可见光下光催化生成过氧化氢

doi:10.1016/S1872-2067(23)64555-3

催化学报 ›› 2023, Vol. 55: 253-264.DOI: 10.1016/S1872-2067(23)64555-3

镓离子掺杂和硫空位调控的In₂S₃增强可见光下光催化生成过氧化氢

李锋^a^,^b, 唐小龙^a^,^b, 胡卓锋^c, 黎相明^d, 李方^a, 谢宇^e, 江燕斌^a^,^b^,^*(), 余长林^a^,^*()

^a广东石油化工学院化学工程学院, 广东茂名 525000
^b华南理工大学化学与化工学院, 广东广州 510000
^c中山大学环境科学与工程学院, 广东省环境污染控制与修复技术重点实验室, 广东广州 510006
^d广东石油化工学院材料科学与工程学院, 广东茂名 525000
^e南昌航空大学环境与化学工程学院, 江西南昌 330063

收稿日期:2023-09-29 接受日期:2023-10-30 出版日期:2023-12-18 发布日期:2023-12-07
通讯作者: *电子邮箱: cebjiang@scut.edu.cn (江燕斌), yuchanglinjx@163.com (余长林).
基金资助:
国家自然科学基金(22272034);国家自然科学基金(22102034);广东省基础与应用基础研究基金(202201011695);广东省基础与应用基础研究基金(2022A1515011900);广东省基础与应用基础研究基金(2023A1515012948);广东省高校珠江学者资助计划(2019);广东省高校环境与能源绿色催化创新团队(2022KCXTD019);江西省双千人才计划;茂名市绿色化工研究院扬帆应用创新项目(MMGCIRI-2022YFJH-Y-002);茂名市科技项目(2020KJZX035)

Boosting the hydrogen peroxide production over In₂S₃ crystals under visible light illumination by gallium ions doping and sulfur vacancies modulation

Feng Li^a^,^b, Xiaolong Tang^a^,^b, Zhuofeng Hu^c, Xiangming Li^d, Fang Li^a, Yu Xie^e, Yanbin Jiang^a^,^b^,^*(), Changlin Yu^a^,^*()

^aSchool of Chemical Engineering, Guangdong University of Petrochemical Technology, Maoming 525000, Guangdong, China
^bSchool of Chemistry and Chemical Engineering, South China University of Technology, Guangzhou 510000, Guangdong, China
^cSchool of Environmental Science and Engineering, Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Environmental Pollution Control and Remediation Technology, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou 510006, Guangdong, China
^dSchool of Materials Sciences and Technology, Guangdong University of Petrochemical Technology, Maoming 525000, Guangdong, China
^eCollege of Environment and Chemical Engineering, Nanchang Hangkong University, Nanchang 330063, Jiangxi, China

Received:2023-09-29 Accepted:2023-10-30 Online:2023-12-18 Published:2023-12-07
Contact: *E-mail: cebjiang@scut.edu.cn (Y. Jiang), yuchanglinjx@163.com (C. Yu).
Supported by:
National Natural Science Foundation of China(22272034);National Natural Science Foundation of China(22102034);Guangdong Basic and Applied Basic Research Foundation(202201011695);Guangdong Basic and Applied Basic Research Foundation(2022A1515011900);Guangdong Basic and Applied Basic Research Foundation(2023A1515012948);Guangdong Province Universities and Colleges Pearl River Scholar Funded Scheme(2019);Environment and Energy Green Catalysis Innovation Team of Colleges and Universities of Guangdong Province(2022KCXTD019);Jiangxi Province “Double Thousand Plan”;Yangfan Applied Innovation Project of Maoming Green Chemical Industry Research Institute(MMGCIRI-2022YFJH-Y-002);Science and Technology Project of Maoming(2020KJZX035)

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

过氧化氢(H₂O₂)是一种绿色氧化剂, 广泛用于日常生活和工业中. 传统的蒽醌法制备H₂O₂的工艺流程繁琐, 并且大量使用有机溶剂, 对环境很不友好; 小规模H₂O₂生产一般采用H₂和O₂直接合成, 但是也存在高温、高压下使用氢气的安全隐患. 人工光催化合成H₂O₂原料(水和氧气)易得且太阳能清洁可再生, 是一个非常有前景的策略. 然而, 在光催化过程中, 电子-空穴对(e^‒-h⁺)的高复合率大大抑制了氧还原反应(ORR)生成H₂O₂的效率.

本文提出了在合成In₂S₃的金属有机框架(MOF)前驱体中加入Ga³⁺离子(IGS5), 并将IGS5在管式炉中在Ar保护下焙烧, 调控S空位, 制得具有高活性的Ga³⁺离子掺杂和S空位调控的In₂S₃光催化剂. 通过X射线粉末衍射和X射线光电子能谱证明了成功掺杂Ga³⁺离子. 扫描电镜、透射电镜和氮气等温吸附脱附曲线结果表明, Sv-IGS-90 (焙烧90 min)为介孔材料. 紫外-可见漫反射光谱结果表明, 所有催化剂均可吸收部分可见光, 结合莫特肖特基曲线结果, 说明催化剂的导带、价带位置均满足光催化生成H₂O₂的最低要求. 采用光致发光光谱、时间分辨光致发光光谱、光电流强度曲线和电化学阻抗曲线研究了催化剂的载流子分离和重组行为. 电子顺磁共振谱结果表明, Sv-IGS-90中存在S空位, 结合O₂程序升温解吸结果, 可以推断S空位可以促进O₂的吸附. 计算了ORR每一步所需的热力学自由能, 结果表明, Ga³⁺离子和S空位协同作用可以提高2e^‒ ORR的选择性并促进O₂的吸附与活化. 制备的Sv-IGS5-90在异丙醇:水为1:9体系中(10 vol%)连续照射(λ ≥ 420 nm)1 h后, H₂O₂浓度达到352.58 μmol L^‒1, 是纯In₂S₃的7.5倍, 450 nm处的表观量子产率为4.64%. 对Sv-IGS5-90光催化产H₂O₂的机理进行了深入研究, DMPO •O₂^‒, DMPO •OH和TEMP ¹O₂信号峰表明, •O₂^‒, •OH, ¹O₂, e^‒和h⁺均参与到整个反应, 说明O₂生成H₂O₂的途径为单电子ORR, •O₂^‒首先被氧化成¹O₂, 然后生成H₂O₂.

综上, 利用S空位调控和Ga³⁺离子掺杂的策略可有效提高In₂S₃催化剂光催化产H₂O₂性能, 为设计高性能的光催化生产H₂O₂的材料提供一定参考.

关键词: 光催化, 硫化铟, 过氧化氢, 硫空位, 镓离子

Abstract:

Hydrogen peroxide (H₂O₂) is a green oxidant that is widely used in daily life and industry. Artificial photocatalytic synthesis of H₂O₂ is a green and sustainable scheme, but the high complexation rate of electron-hole pairs during photocatalysis and the low activation capacity of the catalyst for O₂ greatly inhibit the oxygen reduction reaction. Herein, the first synergistic modification of In₂S₃ using ion doping and vacancy modulation is used in this paper. An In₂S₃-based photocatalyst containing S vacancies and Ga³⁺ ions is designed and synthesized. After continuous irradiation under visible light (λ ≥ 420 nm) for 1 h, the H₂O₂ concentration of the system reaches 352.58 μmol L^-1, which is 7.5 times than that of pure In₂S₃, and the apparent quantum yield at 450 nm is 4.64%. Appropriate concentrations of S vacancies promoted O₂ adsorption, and theoretical calculations demonstrates that Ga³⁺ ions and S vacancies synergistically promote O₂ activation and more favorable for 2e^- oxygen reduction reaction. All these phenomena facilitate H₂O₂ generation. Furthermore, ESR analysis and radical trapping experiments show that the interaction between superoxide anion radicals (•O₂^-), singlet oxygen (¹O₂), h⁺, and proton donor (isopropanol) in the solution phase plays a key role in the photocatalytic synthesis of H₂O₂, which has been largely neglected in previous studies. We suggest that the S vacancy-regulated Ga³⁺ ion-doped In₂S₃ catalyst could provide a reference for the design of high-performance materials for the photocatalytic production of hydrogen peroxide.

Key words: Photocatalysis, Indium sulfide, Hydrogen peroxide, Sulfur vacancy, Gallium ion

李锋, 唐小龙, 胡卓锋, 黎相明, 李方, 谢宇, 江燕斌, 余长林. 镓离子掺杂和硫空位调控的In₂S₃增强可见光下光催化生成过氧化氢[J]. 催化学报, 2023, 55: 253-264.

Feng Li, Xiaolong Tang, Zhuofeng Hu, Xiangming Li, Fang Li, Yu Xie, Yanbin Jiang, Changlin Yu. Boosting the hydrogen peroxide production over In₂S₃ crystals under visible light illumination by gallium ions doping and sulfur vacancies modulation[J]. Chinese Journal of Catalysis, 2023, 55: 253-264.

×
扫码分享

导出引用管理器 EndNote|Ris|BibTeX

链接本文: https://www.cjcatal.com/CN/10.1016/S1872-2067(23)64555-3

https://www.cjcatal.com/CN/Y2023/V55/I12/253

图/表 6

Fig. 1. XRD patterns of all samples: (a) 10°-60°; (b) 10°-25° magnification. High-resolution XPS spectra of IGS5 and Sv-IGS5-90: (c) S 2p; (d) In 3d; (e) Ga 3d.

Fig. 2. (a) N2 adsorption-desorption isotherms for IGS5 and Sv-IGS5. (b) HRTEM magnification-amplified for Sv-IGS5-90. (c) ESR spectra for IGS5 and Sv-IGS5. (b) TG mapping for IGS5 and Sv-IGS5-90. (d) O2-TPD curves of IGS5 and Sv-IGS5-90.

Fig. 3. Energy diagram during the generation of H2O2 via O2 reduction of In2S3 (a) and Sv-IGS5-90 (b). Structure of In2S3 (c) and Sv-IGS5-90 (d) adsorbing *O2, *OOH, *H2O2, *O and *OH.

Fig. 4. All Samples for UV-vis DRS spectra (a) and (αhν)2 curves and band gap width (inset) (b). (c) TRPL spectra for In2S3, IGS5, and Sv-IGS5-90. Comparison of photocurrents (d) and EIS spectra (e) of the all samples. (f) LSV curves for In2S3, IGS5, and Sv-IGS5-90.

Fig. 5. (a) Concentration of H2O2 produced by sample catalyzed for 1 h under visible light. (b) Comparison of H2O2 production over Sv-IGS5-90 and other photocatalysts reported in the past two years. (c) The formation (Kf) and decomposition (Kd) rate constant for H2O2 over samples. (d) H2O2 production by Sv-IGS5-90 in continuous light for 40 h. (e) Sv-IGS5-90 cycle of six H2O2 yield variations. The IS in Fig. 4(c) refers to In2S3.

Fig. 6. (a) DMPO-?O2? ESR spectra of In2S3, IGS5 and Sv-IGS5-90. (b) TEMP-1O2 ESR spectra of Sv-IGS5-90. (c) DMPO-?OH ESR spectra of Sv-IGS5-90. (d) The mechanism of Sv-IGS5-90 photocatalytic generation of H2O2.

参考文献

[1]	L. Wang, J. Zhang, Y. Zhang, H. Yu, Y. Qu, J. Yu, Small, 2022, 18, 2104561.
[2]	H. Hou, X. Zeng, X. Zhang, Angew. Chem. Int. Ed., 2020, 59, 17356-17376.
[3]	S. Fukuzumi, Joule, 2017, 1, 689-738.
[4]	Y. Shiraishi, T. Takii, T. Hagi, S. Mori, Y. Kofuji, Y. Kitagawa, S. Tanaka, S. Ichikawa, T. Hirai, Nat. Mater., 2019, 18, 985-993.
[5]	Z. Teng, Q. Zhang, H. Yang, K. Kato, W. Yang, Y.-R. Lu, S. Liu, C. Wang, A. Yamakata, C. Su, B. Liu, T. Ohno, Nat. Catal., 2021, 4, 374-384.
[6]	F. Li, Q. Y. He, F. Li, X. L. Tang, C. L. Yu, Prog. Chem., 2023, 35, 330-349.
[7]	J. Sun, Y. Wu, Angew. Chem. Int. Ed., 2020, 59, 10904-10908.
[8]	R. Ciriminna, L. Albanese, F. Meneguzzo, M. Pagliaro, ChemSusChem, 2016, 9, 3374-3381.
[9]	Y. Zhang, L. Zhang, D. Zeng, W. Wang, J. Wang, W. Wang, W. Wang, Chin. J. Catal., 2022, 43, 2690-2698.
[10]	H. Lu, X. Li, S. A. Monny, Z. Wang, L. Wang, Chin. J. Catal., 2022, 43, 1204-1215.
[11]	Q. You, C. Zhang, M. Cao, B. Wang, J. Huang, Y. Wang, S. Deng, G. Yu, Appl. Catal. B, 2023, 321, 121941.
[12]	B. Liu, J. Du, G. Ke, B. Jia, Y. Huang, H. He, Y. Zhou, Z. Zou, Adv. Funct. Mater., 2022, 32, 2111125.
[13]	X. Zhang, P. Ma, C. Wang, L. Gan, X. Chen, P. Zhang, Y. Wang, H. Li, L. Wang, X. Zhou, K. Zheng, Energy Environ Sci., 2022, 15, 830-842.
[14]	X. Chen, Y. Kuwahara, K. Mori, C. Louis, H. Yamashita, J. Mater. Chem. A, 2021, 9, 2815-2821.
[15]	Y. Kondo, K. Hino, Y. Kuwahara, K. Mori, H. Yamashita, J. Mater. Chem. A, 2023, 11, 9530-9537.
[16]	D. Chen, W. Chen, Y. Wu, L. Wang, X. Wu, H. Xu, L. Chen, Angew. Chem. Int. Ed., 2023, 62, e202217479.
[17]	X. Di, X. Lv, H. Wang, F. Chen, S. Wang, G. Zheng, B. Wang, Q. Han, Chem. Eng. J., 2023, 455, 140124.
[18]	Y. Yang, B. Cheng, J. Yu, L. Wang, W. Ho, Nano Res., 2023, 16, 4506-4514
[19]	C. Xia, L. Yuan, H. Song, C. Zhang, Z. Li, Y. Zou, J. Li, T. Bao, C. Yu, C. Liu, Small, 2023, 19, 2300292.
[20]	Z. Jiang, Y. Zhang, L. Zhang, B. Cheng, L. Wang, Chin. J. Catal., 2022, 43, 226-233.
[21]	X. Dang, S. Wu, H. Zhao, ACS Sustainable Chem. Eng., 2022, 10, 4161-4172.
[22]	Z. Tian, C. Han, Y. Zhao, W. Dai, X. Lian, Y. Wang, Y. Zheng, Y. Shi, X. Pan, Z. Huang, H. Li, W. Chen, Nat. Commun., 2021, 12, 2039.
[23]	S. M. Ghoreishian, K. S. Ranjith, B. Park, S.-K. Hwang, R. Hosseini, R. Behjatmanesh-Ardakani, S. M. Pourmortazavi, H. U. Lee, B. Son, S. Mirsadeghi, Y.-K. Han, Y. S. Huh, Chem. Eng. J., 2021, 419, 129530.
[24]	Y. Zhang, S.-J. Park, J. Mater. Chem. A, 2018, 6, 20304-20312.
[25]	H. Chen, Y. Xing, S. Liu, Y. Liang, J. Fu, L. Wang, W. Wang, Chem. Eng. J., 2023, 462, 142038.
[26]	K. Zhang, M. Zhou, K. Yang, C. Yu, P. Mu, Z. Yu, K. Lu, W. Huang, W. Dai, J. Hazard. Mater., 2022, 423, 127172.
[27]	Y. Li, Y. Zhao, H. Nie, K. Wei, J. Cao, H. Huang, M. Shao, Y. Liu, Z. Kang, J. Mater. Chem. A, 2021, 9, 515-522.
[28]	X. Ma, W. Li, H. Li, M. Dong, X. Li, L. Geng, H. Fan, Y. Li, H. Qiu, T. Wang, J. Colloid Interface Sci., 2022, 617, 284-292.
[29]	X. Yuan, L. Jiang, J. Liang, Y. Pan, J. Zhang, H. Wang, L. Leng, Z. Wu, R. Guan, G. Zeng, Chem. Eng. J., 2019, 356, 371-381.
[30]	H. Xu, Y. Wang, X. Dong, N. Zheng, H. Ma, X. Zhang, Appl. Catal. B, 2019, 257, 117932.
[31]	Y. Zhang, Y. Li, X. Xin, Y. Wang, P. Guo, R. Wang, B. Wang, W. Huang, A. J. Sobrido, X. Li, Nat. Energy., 2023, 8, 504-514.
[32]	J. Feng, Z. Yang, S. He, X. Niu, T. Zhang, A. Ding, H. Liang, X. Feng, Chemosphere, 2018, 212, 114-123.
[33]	H. Xie, Y. Zheng, X. Guo, Y. Liu, Z. Zhang, J. Zhao, W. Zhang, Y. Wang, Y. Huang, ACS Sustainable Chem. Eng., 2021, 9, 6788-6798.
[34]	X. Li, J. Zhang, F. Zhou, H. Zhang, J. Bai, Y. Wang, H. Wang, Chin. J. Catal., 2018, 39, 1090-1098.
[35]	Z. Yu, K. Yang, C. Yu, K. Lu, W. Huang, L. Xu, L. Zou, S. Wang, Z. Chen, J. Hu, Y. Hou, Y. Zhu, Adv. Funt. Mater., 2022, 32, 2111999.
[36]	Z. He, Y. Wang, X. Dong, N. Zheng, H. Ma, X. Zhang, RSC Adv., 2019, 9, 21646-21652.
[37]	S. Wu, H. Yu, S. Chen, X. Quan, ACS Catal., 2020, 10, 14380-14389.
[38]	S. Wang, B. Y. Guan, Y. Lu, X. W. D. Lou, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2017, 139, 17305-17308.
[39]	Y.-Z. Zhang, C. Liang, H.-P. Feng, W. Liu, Chem. Eng. J., 2022, 446, 137379.
[40]	L. Li, Z. Hu, J. C. Yu, Angew. Chem. Int. Ed., 2020, 59, 20538-20544.
[41]	Z. Hu, Y. Lu, M. Liu, X. Zhang, J. Cai, J. Mater. Chem. A, 2021, 9, 338-348.
[42]	Z. Hu, J. Gong, Z. Ye, Y. Liu, X. Xiao, J. C. Yu, J. Catal., 2020, 384, 88-95.
[43]	L. Li, Z. Hu, Y. Kang, S. Cao, L. Xu, L. Yu, L. Zhang, J. C. Yu, Nat. Commun., 2023, 14, 1890.
[44]	H. Li, C. Tsai, A. L. Koh, L. Cai, A. W. Contryman, A. H. Fragapane, J. Zhao, H. S. Han, H. C. Manoharan, F. Abild-Pedersen, J. K. Nørskov, X. Zheng, Nat. Mater., 2016, 15, 48-53.
[45]	X. Sun, X. Luo, X. Zhang, J. Xie, S. Jin, H. Wang, X. Zheng, X. Wu, Y. Xie, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2019, 141, 3797-3801.
[46]	L. Yang, A. Li, T. Dang, Y. Wang, L. Liang, J. Tang, Y. Cui, Z. Zhang, Appl. Surf. Sci., 2023, 612, 155848.
[47]	X. Zheng, X. He, H. Peng, J. Wen, S. Lv, Bioresour. Technol., 2021, 334, 125238.
[48]	Z. Liu, J. Tian, C. Yu, Q. Fan, X. Liu, Chin. J. Catal., 2022, 43, 472-484.
[49]	Q. Li, T. Zhao, M. Li, W. Li, B. Yang, D. Qin, K. Lv, X. Wang, L. Wu, X. Wu, J. Sun, Appl. Catal. B, 2019, 249, 1-8.
[50]	S. Cao, Y. Wu, J. Hou, B. Zhang, Z. Li, X. Nie, L. Sun, Adv. Energy. Mater., 2020, 10, 1902935.
[51]	J. Zhao, C. Fu, K. Ye, Z. Liang, F. Jiang, S. Shen, X. Zhao, L. Ma, Z. Shadike, X. Wang, J. Zhang, K. Jiang, Nat. Commun., 2022, 13, 685.
[52]	X. Guo, S. Lin, J. Gu, S. Zhang, Z. Chen, S. Huang, ACS Catal., 2019, 9, 11042-11054.
[53]	M. M. Montemore, M. A. van Spronsen, R. J. Madix, C. M. Friend, Chem. Rev., 2018, 118, 2816-2862.
[54]	X. Tang, F. Li, F. Li, Y. Jiang, C. Yu, Chin. J. Catal., 2023, 52, 79-98.
[55]	X. Li, J. Zhu, B. Sun, Q. Yuan, H. Li, Z. Ma, T. Xu, X. Chen, M. Fu, J. Mater. Chem. A, 2023, 11, 1503-1510.
[56]	Y. Shao, J. Hu, T. Yang, X. Yang, J. Qu, Q. Xu, C. M. Li, Carbon, 2022, 190, 337-347.
[57]	H. Song, Q. Zhang, D. Hu, Z. Sun, Y. Han, H. Meng, T. Sun, X. Zhang, Sep. Purif. Technol., 2022, 287, 120585.
[58]	J. Wang, Y. Wang, M. Yu, G. Li, S. Zhang, Q. Zhong, J. Colloid Interface Sci., 2022, 611, 71-81.
[59]	Y. Liu, C. Chen, Y. He, Z. Zhang, M. Li, C. Li, X.-B. Chen, Y. Han, Z. Shi, Small, 2022, 18, 2201556.
[60]	Y. Liu, Y. Zheng, W. Zhang, Z. Peng, H. Xie, Y. Wang, X. Guo, M. Zhang, R. Li, Y. Huang, J. Mater. Sci. Technol., 2021, 95, 127-135.
[61]	X. Han, B. Lu, X. Huang, C. Liu, S. Chen, J. Chen, Z. Zeng, S. Deng, J. Wang, Appl. Catal. B, 2022, 316, 121587.
[62]	M. Kou, Y. Wang, Y. Xu, L. Ye, Y. Huang, B. Jia, H. Li, J. Ren, Y. Deng, J. Chen, Y. Zhou, K. Lei, L. Wang, W. Liu, H. Huang, T. Ma, Angew. Chem. Int. Ed., 2022, 61, e202200413.
[63]	J. Luo, C. Fan, L. Tang, Y. Liu, Z. Gong, T. Wu, X. Zhen, C. Feng, H. Feng, L. Wang, L. Xu, M. Yan, Appl. Catal. B, 2022, 301, 120757.
[64]	M. Gu, Y. Yang, L. Zhang, B. Zhu, G. Liang, J. Yu, Appl. Catal. B, 2023, 324, 122227.
[65]	Y. Yang, C. Zhang, D. Huang, G. Zeng, J. Huang, C. Lai, C. Zhou, W. Wang, H. Guo, W. Xue, R. Deng, M. Cheng, W. Xiong, Appl. Catal. B, 2019, 245, 87-99.

镓离子掺杂和硫空位调控的In₂S₃增强可见光下光催化生成过氧化氢

Boosting the hydrogen peroxide production over In₂S₃ crystals under visible light illumination by gallium ions doping and sulfur vacancies modulation

RichHTML

PDF

Supporting Information

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

扫码分享

图/表 6

参考文献

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

[1]	赵彬彬, 钟威, 陈峰, 王苹, 别传彪, 余火根. 高晶化g-C₃N₄光催化剂: 合成、结构调控和光催化产氢[J]. 催化学报, 2023, 52(9): 127-143.
[2]	唐小龙, 李锋, 李方, 江燕斌, 余长林. 单原子催化剂在光催化和电催化合成过氧化氢中的研究进展[J]. 催化学报, 2023, 52(9): 79-98.
[3]	蔡铭洁, 刘艳萍, 董珂欣, 陈晓波, 李世杰. 漂浮型Bi₂WO₆/C₃N₄/碳布S型异质结光催化材料用于高效净化水体环境[J]. 催化学报, 2023, 52(9): 239-251.
[4]	王思恺, 闵祥婷, 乔波涛, 颜宁, 张涛. 单原子催化: 追寻催化领域的“圣杯”[J]. 催化学报, 2023, 52(9): 1-13.
[5]	江梓聪, 程蓓, 张留洋, 张振翼, 别传彪. 氧化锌基梯型异质结光催化剂[J]. 催化学报, 2023, 52(9): 32-49.
[6]	刘博文, 蔡家杰, 张建军, 谭海燕, 程蓓, 许景三. MOF/CdS梯型光催化剂同时进行苯甲醇氧化和析氢反应及其机理研究[J]. 催化学报, 2023, 51(8): 204-215.
[7]	宋明明, 宋相海, 刘鑫, 周伟强, 霍鹏伟. ZnIn₂S₄/MOF-808微球结构S型异质结光催化剂的制备及其光还原CO₂性能研究[J]. 催化学报, 2023, 51(8): 180-192.
[8]	邵秀丽, 李可, 李静萍, 程强, 王国宏, 王楷. 揭示NiS@Ta₂O₅纳米纤维中梯型电荷转移路径及光催化CO₂转化性能[J]. 催化学报, 2023, 51(8): 193-203.
[9]	李嘉明, 李源, 王小田, 杨直雄, 张高科. TiO₂上原子分散的Fe位点促进光催化CO₂还原: 增强的催化活性、 DFT计算和机制洞察[J]. 催化学报, 2023, 51(8): 145-156.
[10]	程璐, 陈许宁, 胡培君, 曹宵鸣. 双氧水对于单核铜分子筛催化甲烷直接氧化制甲醇反应性能的利弊[J]. 催化学报, 2023, 51(8): 135-144.
[11]	阎菲, 张由子, 刘思碧, 邹睿卿, Jahan B Ghasemi, 李炫华. 供体-受体型卟啉基金属有机框架实现有效电荷分离高效光催化析氢[J]. 催化学报, 2023, 51(8): 124-134.
[12]	孙利娟, 王伟康, 路平, 刘芹芹, 王乐乐, 唐华. 纳米高熵合金实现光催化剂肖特基势垒的调控用于光催化制氢与苯甲醇氧化耦合反应[J]. 催化学报, 2023, 51(8): 90-100.
[13]	刘海峰, 黄祥, 陈加藏. 电子态调控促进氢气无损耗纯化中CO的光致富集和氧化[J]. 催化学报, 2023, 51(8): 49-54.
[14]	袁鑫, 范海滨, 刘杰, 覃龙州, 王剑, 段秀, 邱江凯, 郭凯. 连续流技术在光氧化还原催化转化的最新进展[J]. 催化学报, 2023, 50(7): 175-194.
[15]	刘德法, 孙彬, 白硕杰, 高婷婷, 周国伟. 双助催化剂Ag/Ti₃C₂/TiO₂分层花状微球用于增强光催化产氢活性[J]. 催化学报, 2023, 50(7): 273-283.