W掺杂调控Jahn-Teller效应构建高稳定性W-CoMnP析氢电催化剂

doi:10.1016/S1872-2067(25)64669-9

催化学报 ›› 2025, Vol. 74: 264-278.DOI: 10.1016/S1872-2067(25)64669-9

W掺杂调控Jahn-Teller效应构建高稳定性W-CoMnP析氢电催化剂

安博涵^a^,^b, 李鑫^a^,^b, 刘威龙^a^,^b, 董继鹏^a^,^b, 边锐超^a^,^b, 张璐瑶^a^,^b, 李宁^a^,^b, 高旸钦^a^,^b, 戈磊^a^,^b^,^*()

^a中国石油大学(北京)新能源与材料学院重油加工国家重点实验室, 北京 102249
^b中国石油大学(北京)新能源与材料学院材料科学与工程系, 北京 102249

收稿日期:2025-01-21 接受日期:2025-02-06 出版日期:2025-07-18 发布日期:2025-07-20
通讯作者: *电子信箱: gelei@cup.edu.cn, gelei08@sina.com (戈磊).
基金资助:
国家自然科学基金(52473327);国家自然科学基金(51572295);国家自然科学基金(21273285);国家重点研发计划(2021YFA1501300);国家重点研发计划(2019YFC1907602)

Developing a stable and high-performance W-CoMnP electrocatalyst by mitigating the Jahn-Teller effect through W doping strategy

Bohan An^a^,^b, Xin Li^a^,^b, Weilong Liu^a^,^b, Jipeng Dong^a^,^b, Ruichao Bian^a^,^b, Luyao Zhang^a^,^b, Ning Li^a^,^b, Yangqin Gao^a^,^b, Lei Ge^a^,^b^,^*()

^aState Key Laboratory of Heavy Oil Processing, College of New Energy and Materials, China University of Petroleum Beijing, Beijing 102249, China
^bDepartment of Materials Science and Engineering, College of New Energy and Materials, China University of Petroleum Beijing, Beijing 102249, China

Received:2025-01-21 Accepted:2025-02-06 Online:2025-07-18 Published:2025-07-20
Contact: *E-mail: gelei08@sina.com, gelei@cup.edu.cn (L. Ge).
Supported by:
National Natural Science Foundation of China(52473327);National Natural Science Foundation of China(51572295);National Natural Science Foundation of China(21273285);National Key R&D Program of China(2021YFA1501300);National Key R&D Program of China(2019YFC1907602)

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

近年来, 全球能源危机和碳排放问题日益严峻, 氢燃料因其高能量密度(140 MJ/kg)和零碳排放特性, 被视为替代化石燃料的最佳选择. 其中, 通过电化学水分解制备的绿氢被认为是最环保、最可持续的制氢方式. 然而, 该过程涉及两个半反应, 即析氢反应(HER)和析氧反应(OER), 其中OER反应由于其缓慢的动力学过程, 成为限制能量转换效率的关键瓶颈. 这主要是因为OER涉及四步质子耦合电子转移, 使其反应动力学受限. 通过实验数据和密度泛函理论(DFT)计算的共同证实, 双金属磷化物纳米团簇材料在较高的电子密度下表现出显著的异质结行为.

高效金属磷化物电催化剂的电子调制特性可用于调节OER性能. 然而, 提高整体水分解性能仍然是一项具有挑战性的任务. 锰基材料受姜-泰勒(Jahn-Teller)效应影响, 发生Mn³⁺的自发歧化(2Mn³⁺ → Mn²⁺ + Mn⁴⁺)和Mn²⁺的溶解, 导致活性降低. 本文采用独特的了W掺杂策略来抑制这种影响. 外部首先采用简单的无模板方法制备钴基和锰基前驱体, 然后在合成过渡双金属磷化物时进行W掺杂. 最终获得了W掺杂的双金属磷化物(表示为W-CoMnP). 这种调节深刻影响了W-CoMnP的电子结构, 同时也提高了催化剂的性能. 具体来说, 这种调节导致材料基质中形成配位不饱和的Co和Mn原子, 而这些原子又成为氧分子捕获的关键位点, 促进O-O键的有利合成, 这是OER中的关键步骤, 随后, 被释放的O*原子被嵌入W-CoMnP晶格中的Co原子捕获. 通过与相邻的Co原子配位, 被捕获的O*原子表现出活性Co催化中心, 特别是在较高的自旋电子态下. Bader电荷分析了这些现象, 表明在整个OER过程中, Co催化中心逐渐向更高的氧化态移动. 从碱性溶液中选择性捕获OOH*中间体归因于存在可容纳不成对自旋电子的低能3d轨道. 在平衡CoNi基催化剂与Mn基催化剂的过程中, Mn基催化剂具有自身的多种优势.

综上所述, W-CoMnP材料表现出优异的HER和OER性能, 过电位低至95 mV (η₁₀ HER)和225 mV(η₅₀ OER), 并且可以在1.52 V电压下实现整体水分解, 同时保持24 h的稳定循环. 为了实现商业应用, W-CoMnP被整合到阴离子交换膜(AEM)电解水装置中, 在环境温度条件下实现了连续稳定的氢气生产. 这为未来开发AEM电解水装置的催化剂提供了一种有前途的策略.

关键词: 双金属磷化物, 密度泛函理论计算, 姜-泰勒效应, W掺杂, 阴离子交换膜电解水装置

Abstract:

Manganese-based materials are influenced by the Jahn-Teller effect, causing the spontaneous dismutation of Mn³⁺ (2Mn³⁺ → Mn²⁺ + Mn⁴⁺) and the dissolution of Mn²⁺, which often results in diminished activity. This study uniquely employs a W doping strategy to suppress this effect. Externally, a simple template-free method was initially used to prepare cobalt- and manganese-based precursors, followed by a W doping process during the synthesis of transition bimetallic phosphides. Ultimately, W-doped bimetallic phosphides (W-CoMnP) were obtained. The W-CoMnP material demonstrates excellent HER and OER performance with low overpotentials of 95 mV (η₁₀ HER) and 225 mV (η₅₀ OER), and can achieve overall water splitting at a voltage of 1.52 V while maintaining stable cycling for 24 h. To enable commercial application, W-CoMnP was incorporated into an anion exchange membrane (AEM) electrolysis water device, demonstrating continuous and stable hydrogen production under ambient temperature conditions. This study offers a promising strategy for the future development of catalysts for AEM electrolysis water devices.

Key words: Bimetallic phosphide, Density functional theory calculation, Jiang-Taylor effect, W doping, Anion exchange membrane water electrolysis device

安博涵, 李鑫, 刘威龙, 董继鹏, 边锐超, 张璐瑶, 李宁, 高旸钦, 戈磊. W掺杂调控Jahn-Teller效应构建高稳定性W-CoMnP析氢电催化剂[J]. 催化学报, 2025, 74: 264-278.

Bohan An, Xin Li, Weilong Liu, Jipeng Dong, Ruichao Bian, Luyao Zhang, Ning Li, Yangqin Gao, Lei Ge. Developing a stable and high-performance W-CoMnP electrocatalyst by mitigating the Jahn-Teller effect through W doping strategy[J]. Chinese Journal of Catalysis, 2025, 74: 264-278.

×
扫码分享

导出引用管理器 EndNote|Ris|BibTeX

链接本文: https://www.cjcatal.com/CN/10.1016/S1872-2067(25)64669-9

https://www.cjcatal.com/CN/Y2025/V74/I7/264

图/表 10

Fig. 1. (a) Process flowchart for preparing W-CoMnP. (b) SEM image of W-CoMnP. (c) TEM images of W-CoMnP; (d-f) high resolution HRTEM images of W-CoMnP. (g) SAED image of W-CoMnP. (h-o) EDS elemental mapping images for C, N, O, Co, Mn, P and W separately.

Fig. 2. XRD patterns of W-CoMnP (a), MnP and CoP3 (b), W-MnP and W-CoP3 (c). (d) Raman spectra of W-CoMnP and CoMnP. (e) Infrared spectra of W-CoMnP and CoMnP. (f) SBET image of W-CoMnP and CoMnP. (g) Comparison graph of Co XPS peaks. (h) Comparison graph of Mn XPS peaks. (i) Comparison graph of P XPS peaks.

Fig. 3. (a) The LSV curves of W-CoMnP, CoMnP, W-CoP3, W-MnP, CoP3, MnP and CG. (b) Tafel slops of W-CoMnP, W-CoMnP, W-CoP3, W-MnP, CoP3, MnP and CG. (c) Relevant overpotentials at η10, η50 and η100 of the samples. (d) EIS Impedance of the prepared catalyst. (e) Double layer capacitance Cdl curves. (f) HER stability test of W-CoMnP. (g) Comparison of HER performance with other catalysts. (h) Comparison of HER LSV before and after stability testing.

Fig. 4. (a) LSV curves of W-CoMnP, CoMnP, W-CoP3, W-MnP, CoP3, MnP and CG. (b) Tafel slops of W-CoMnP, W-CoMnP, W-CoP3, W-MnP, CoP3, MnP and CG. (c) Relevant overpotentials at η50, η100 and η150 of the samples. (d) EIS Impedance of the prepared catalyst. (e) Double layer capacitance Cdl curves. (f) OER stability test of W-CoMnP. (g) Comparison of OER performance with other catalysts. (h) Comparison of OER LSV before and after stability testing.

Fig. 5. (a) Overall water splitting LSV curves of as-prepared catalysts at 1 mol/L KOH. (b) Activity comparison with other electrocatalysts. (c) XRD pattern of W-CoMnP recovered for OER reaction.

Fig. 6. (a) Structural diagram of AEM equipment. (b) Conductivity of W-CoMnP. (c) Internal diagram of AEM equipment electrolysis water operation. (d) LSV curves of catalysts at 1 mol/L KOH in AEM equipment.

Fig. 7. (a) In situ Raman spectra of W-CoMnP in 1 mol/L NaOH. (b) In situ Raman spectroscopy, peak information of W-CoMnP. (c) Explanation of the formation of CoOOH. (d) Schematic representation of the electronic coupling between Co and Mn in W-CoMnP.

Fig. 8. (a) Free energy diagram of HER intermediates at different U values. (b) The reaction pathway of the HER process (U = 0); image is most likely OER mechanism. Gibbs free energy profiles along the reaction pathway of CoMnP (c) and W-CoMnP (d). The differential charge density diagram of W-CoMnP catalyzer (yellow: loss electrons, blue: obtain electrons) of top (e) and slide (f). (g) Schematic diagram of OER process.

Fig. 9. Density of states projected on the d-states of Co in W-CoMnP (a), Mn in W-CoMnP (b), Co in CoMnP (c), and Mn in CoMnP (d). Dashed-dotted lines and the numbers show the position of d-band center. Eg density of states projected on the d-states of Co in W-CoMnP(e), Mn in W-CoMnP (f), Co in CoMnP (g), and Mn in CoMnP (h). (i) The atomic structure of Mn and its typical valence states in cathode materials. (j) Schematic diagrams of Mn 3d orbitals with high-/low-spin Mn3+ ions. (k) Schematic diagram of octahedral Mn based material before and after J-T distortion. (l) The molecular orbital energy diagram of the octahedral Mn based material and the electronic orbitals of Mn2+/Mn3+/Mn4+ ions.

Fig. 10. The trade-off between CoNi based catalysts and Mn based catalysts.

参考文献

[1]	A. Wang, L. Zhang, X. Li, Y. Gao, N. Li, G. Lu, L. Ge. Chin. J. Catal., 2022, 43, 1295-1305.
[2]	S. Li, L. Wang, H. Su, A.N. Hong, Y. Wang, H. Yang, L. Ge, W. Song, J. Liu, T. Ma, X. Bu, P. Feng, Adv. Funct. Mater., 2022, 32, 2200733.
[3]	J. Jiang, F. Li, H. Su, Y. Gao, N. Li, L. Ge, Chin. Chem. Lett., 2022, 33, 4367-4374.
[4]	S. Li, Y. Gao, N. Li, L. Ge, X. Bu, P. Feng, Energy Environ. Sci., 2021, 14, 1897-1927.
[5]	N. T. Suen, S. F. Hung, Q. Quan, N. Zhang, Y. J. Xu, H. M. Chen, Chem. Soc. Rev., 2017, 46, 337-365.
[6]	H. Su, J. Jiang, S. Song, B. An, N. Li, Y. Gao, L. Ge, Chin. J. Catal., 2023, 44, 7-49.
[7]	K. Lai, Y. Sun, N. Li, Y. Gao, H. Li, L. Ge, T. Ma, Adv. Funct. Mater., 2024, 2409031.
[8]	Y. Sun, K. Lai, N. Li, Y. Gao, L. Ge, Appl. Catal. B, 2024, 357, 124302.
[9]	Y. Sun, K. Lai, X. Shi, N. Li, Y. Gao, L. Ge, Appl. Catal. B, 2025, 365, 124907.
[10]	W. Liu, J. Dong, B. An, H. Su, Z. Teng, N. Li, Y. Gao, L. Ge, J. Colloid Interface Sci., 2024, 673, 228-238.
[11]	J. Dong, B. An, W. Liu, H. Su, N. Li, Y. Gao, L. Ge, Chem. Eng. J., 2024, 498, 155102.
[12]	J. Dong, W. Liu, B. An, H. Su, L. Zhang, N. Li, Y. Gao, L. Ge, Sep. Purif. Technol., 2024, 342, 127017.
[13]	N. Chen, Y. M. Lee, Prog. Polym. Sci., 2021, 113, 101345.
[14]	L. Li, J. Su, Y. Qiu, N. Li, Y. Gao, L. Ge, Chin. J. Struct. Chem., 2024, 43,100472.
[15]	W. Liu, Z. Teng, B. An, J. Dong, N. Li, Y. Gao, L. Ge, Chem. Eng. J., 2025, 504, 158932.
[16]	Z. Ge, J. Li, H. Zhang, C. Liu, G. Che, Z. Liu, Adv. Funct. Mater., 2024, 34, 2411024.
[17]	X. Li, L. Zheng, S. Liu, T. Ouyang, S. Ye, Z. Liu, Chin. Chem. Lett., 2022, 33, 4761-4765.
[18]	J. Chen, Q. Long, K. Xiao, T. Ouyang, N. Li, S. Ye, Z. Liu, Sci. Bull., 2021, 66, 1063-1072.
[19]	T. Ouyang, Y. Ye, C. Wu, K. Xiao, Z. Liu, Angew. Chem. Int. Ed., 2019, 58, 4923-4928.
[20]	L. Wan, J. Liu, D. Lin, Z. Xu, Y. Zhen, M. Pang, Q. Xu, B. Wang, Energy Environ. Sci., 2024, 17, 3396-3408.
[21]	Y. Duan, L. L. Wang, W. X. Zheng, X. L. Zhang, X. R. Wang, G. J. Feng, Z. Y. Yu, T. B. Lu, Angew. Chem. Int. Ed., 2024, 63, e202413653.
[22]	J. Zhang, M. Yang, X. Zhu, J. Dang, J. Ma, B. Liu, T. Huang, M. Ouyang, F. Yang, Chem. Eng. J., 2023, 476, 146576.
[23]	J. E. Park, S. Kim, O.-H. Kim, C.-Y. Ahn, M.-J. Kim, S. Y. Kang, T. I. Jeon, J.-G. Shim, D.W. Lee, J. H. Lee, Y.-H. Cho, Y.-E. Sung, Nano Energy, 2019, 58, 158-166.
[24]	P. Yu, F. Wang, T. A. Shifa, X. Zhan, X. Lou, F. Xia, J. He, Nano Energy, 2019, 58, 244-276.
[25]	H. Du, R. M. Kong, X. Guo, F. Qu, J. Li, Nanoscale, 2018, 10, 21617-21624.
[26]	B. Owens-Baird, Y. V. Kolen'ko, K. Kovnir, Chem. Eur. J., 2018, 24, 7298-7311.
[27]	Y. Hua, Q. Xu, Y. Hu, H. Jiang, C. Li, J. Energy Chem., 2019, 37, 1-6.
[28]	D. Li, H. Baydoun, C. N. Verani, S. L. Brock, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2016, 138, 4006-4009.
[29]	S. Liu, B. Wang, X. Zhang, S. Zhao, Z. Zhang, H. Yu, Matter, 2021, 4, 1511-1527.
[30]	P. Yang, D. Gao, Y. Yang, Z. Jia, Y. Li, J. Xia, D. Yi, X. Wang, Y. Yang,, Nano Energy, 2024, 125, 109570.
[31]	L. Naderi, S. Shahrokhian, Chem. Eng. J., 2023, 456, 141088.
[32]	Q. Liu, Y. Luo, W. Chen, Y. Yan, L. Xue, W. Zhang, Chem. Eng. J., 2018, 347, 455-461.
[33]	X. Sun, S. Zhao, A. Bachmatiuk, M. H. Rummeli, S. Gorantla, M. Zeng, L. Fu, Small, 2020, 16, 2001484.
[34]	B. An, J. Li, X. Wu, W. Li, Y. Li, L. Sun, H. Mi, Q. Zhang, C. He, X. Ren, Nanoscale, 2020, 12, 21770-21779.
[35]	M. Kurek, M. Carnoy, P. E. Larsen, L. H. Nielsen, O. Hansen, T. Rades, S. Schmid, A. Boisen, Angew. Chem. Int. Ed., 2017, 56, 3901-3905.
[36]	J. Gu, L. Sun, Y. Zhang, Q. Zhang, X. Li, H. Si, Y. Shi, C. Sun, Y. Gong, Y. Zhang,, Chem. Eng. J., 2020, 385, 123454.
[37]	M. Pi, T. Wu, D. Zhang, S. Chen, S. Wang, Nanoscale, 2016, 8, 19779-19786.
[38]	B. An, R. Bian, J. Dong, W. Liu, H. Su, N. Li, Y. Gao, L. Ge, Chem. Eng. J., 2024, 485, 149903.
[39]	Y. Z. Zhang, Y. Wang, Y. L. Xie, T. Cheng, W. Y. Lai, H. Pang, W. Huang, Nanoscale, 2014, 6, 14354-14359.
[40]	J. Li, F. Dou, J. Gong, Y. Gao, Y. Hua, K. Sielicki, D. Zhang, E. Mijowska, X. Chen, ACS Appl. Nano Mater., 2023, 6, 1171-1180.
[41]	X. Hong, C. Deng, G. Wang, X. Wang, W. Dong, Chem. Eng. J., 2023, 451, 139036.
[42]	H. Roh, H. Jung, H. Choi, J.W. Han, T. Park, S. Kim, K. Yong, Appl. Catal.B, 2021, 297, 120434.
[43]	J. Loh, J. Foo, F. Yap, H. Liang, W. Ong, Chin. J. Catal., 2024, 58, 37-85.
[44]	Y. Guo, S. Li, W. Abebe, J. Wang, L. Shi, D. Liu, S. Zhao, Chin. J. Catal., 2024, 67, 21-53.
[45]	T. Zhao, B. Gong, G. Xu, J. Jiang, L. Zhang, Chin. J. Catal., 2024, 61, 269-280.
[46]	Q. Xue, Z. Wang, Y. Ding, F. Li, Y. Chen, Chin. J. Catal., 2023, 45, 6-16.
[47]	X. Tong, Y. Li, N. Pang, Y. Qu, C. Yan, D. Xiong, S. Xu, L. Wang, P. K. Chu, Chem. Eng. J., 2021, 425, 130455.
[48]	B. An, W. Liu, J. Dong, N. Li, Y. Gao, L. Ge, Chin. J. Catal., 2024, 65, 113-125.
[49]	L. Guo, J. Chi, T. Cui, J. Zhu, Y. Xia, H. Guo, J. Lai, L. Wang, Adv. Energy Mater., 2024, 31, 2400975.
[50]	W. D. Chemelewski, H. C. Lee, J. F. Lin, A. J. Bard, C. B. Mullins, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2014, 136, 2843-2850.
[51]	M. W. Louie, A. T. Bell, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2013, 135, 12329-12337.
[52]	N. Xue, Z. Lin, P. Li, P. Diao, Q. Zhang, ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces, 2020, 12, 28288-28297.
[53]	J. Chen, L. Zhang, J. Li, X. He, Y. Zheng, S. Sun, X. Fang, D. Zheng, Y. Luo, Y. Wang, J. Zhang, L. Xie, Z. Cai, Y. Sun, A. A. Alshehri, Q. Kong, C. Tang, X. Sun, J. Mater. Chem. A, 2023, 11, 1116-1122.
[54]	L. Li, L. Zhang, L. Gou, S. Wei, X. Hou, L. Wu, Chem. Eng. J., 2023, 454, 140292.
[55]	B. Lan, Y. Xiang, X. Luo, D. Wu, L. Zhang, J. Duan, M. Guo, Y. Ito, Y. Liu, Chem. Eng. J., 2022, 430, 132886.
[56]	M. T. Ahsan, Z. Ali, D. Qiu, B. Zhang, J. J. Wang, Y. Hou, Small, 2024, 20, 2402275.
[57]	Y. Zheng, H. Xie, J. Li, K. S. Hui, Z. Yu, H. Xu, D. A. Dinh, Z. Ye, C. Zha, K. N. Hui, Adv. Energy Mater., 2024, 14, 2400461.

W掺杂调控Jahn-Teller效应构建高稳定性W-CoMnP析氢电催化剂

Developing a stable and high-performance W-CoMnP electrocatalyst by mitigating the Jahn-Teller effect through W doping strategy

RichHTML

PDF

Supporting Information

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

扫码分享

图/表 10

参考文献

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

[1]	李爽, 林海莉, 贾雪梅, 金昕, 汪钱龙, 李馨悦, 陈士夫, 曹静. 双金属Ni_xFe₂₋_xP修饰的RP用于增强光催化苯甲醇氧化耦合产H₂[J]. 催化学报, 2025, 70(3): 363-377.
[2]	Dae-Hwan Lim, Aadil Bathla, Hassan Anwer, Sherif A. Younis, Danil W. Boukhvalov, Ki-Hyun Kim. 氮掺杂对环境空气中TiO₂纳米催化剂抗甲醛光催化矿化的影响[J]. 催化学报, 2024, 59(4): 303-323.
[3]	潘劲康, 张艾彩珺, 张莉华, 董鹏玉. 由质子化D-A型聚合物和MoS₂构建S型异质结实现高效光催化析氢[J]. 催化学报, 2024, 58(3): 180-193.
[4]	杨艳玲, 韩沛杰, 张元宝, 林敬东, 万绍隆, 王勇, 刘海超, 王帅. 用于间甲酚高效加氢脱氧制芳烃的负载型W₂C纳米催化剂的活性位研究[J]. 催化学报, 2024, 67(12): 91-101.
[5]	安博涵, 刘威龙, 董继鹏, 李宁, 高旸钦, 戈磊. 原子轨道调节的MOF衍生结构的双功能双金属磷化物用于促进高效的整体水分解[J]. 催化学报, 2024, 65(10): 113-125.
[6]	井会娟, 龙军, 李欢, 傅笑言, 肖建平. 电催化硝酸盐还原合成氨电势相关性的计算见解[J]. 催化学报, 2023, 48(5): 205-213.
[7]	赵志月, 蒋志伟, 黄一哲, Mebrouka Boubeche, Valentina G. Matveeva, Hector F. Garces, 罗惠霞, 严凯. 富空穴CoSi合金无溶剂无碱醇氧化[J]. 催化学报, 2023, 48(5): 175-184.
[8]	李楠, 王传义, 章柯, 吕海钦, 苑明哲, Detlef W. Bahnemann. 光催化转化低浓度NO的进展与展望[J]. 催化学报, 2022, 43(9): 2363-2387.
[9]	Ernest Pahuyo Delmo, 王忆安, 王菁, 朱尚乾, 李铁怀, 秦雪苹, 田一博, 赵青蓝, Juhee Jang, 王一诺, 谷猛, 张莉莉, 邵敏华. 金属有机框架-离子液体混合催化剂用于电化学还原二氧化碳生成甲烷[J]. 催化学报, 2022, 43(7): 1687-1696.
[10]	高海峡, 刘康, 罗涛, 陈羽, 胡俊华, 傅俊伟, 刘敏. 单原子Co位点的CO₂还原反应路径:局部配位环境的影响[J]. 催化学报, 2022, 43(3): 832-838.
[11]	王森, 李志凯, 秦张峰, 董梅, 李俊汾, 樊卫斌, 王建国. H-ZSM-5分子筛不同孔道处的酸位在甲醇制烯烃反应中的催化作用[J]. 催化学报, 2021, 42(7): 1126-1136.
[12]	钟静萍, 黄科薪, 许文涛, 唐华果, Muhammad Waqas, 樊友军, 王睿翔, 陈卫, 王沂轩. 导电共聚物衍化新策略制备硫、氮共掺杂碳纳米管及其对改善PtCu纳米晶分散性与甲醇电催化氧化的促进作用[J]. 催化学报, 2021, 42(7): 1205-1215.
[13]	吴倩, 高庆平, 孙丽梅, 郭焕美, 台夕市, 李丹, 刘莉, 凌崇益, 孙旭平. CeO₂修饰Ni₃S₂纳米片用于高效电催化析氧[J]. 催化学报, 2021, 42(3): 482-489.
[14]	马晓旭, 邱盟峯, 葛亮, 李晓岩, 李亚军, 吴莉, 鲍红丽. 酞菁铁催化烯烃自由基膦叠氮化反应: 利用叠氮快速转移合成膦叠氮的温和方法[J]. 催化学报, 2021, 42(10): 1634-1640.
[15]	Ya-Qiong Su, Long Zhang, Valery Muravev, Emiel J. M. Hensen. 过渡金属掺杂铈中晶格氧的活化[J]. 催化学报, 2020, 41(6): 977-984.