原位重构构建Cu-In2O3富电子界面实现低电位下高选择性CO2还原转化为CO

doi:10.1016/S1872-2067(26)65017-6

催化学报 ›› 2026, Vol. 85: 117-129.DOI: 10.1016/S1872-2067(26)65017-6

原位重构构建Cu-In₂O₃富电子界面实现低电位下高选择性CO₂还原转化为CO

阳斌^a^,¹, Ouardia Akdim^b^,¹, 袁成成^a, 李睿娜^a, 余罗^a, Hermenegildo García^c, 余家国^a(), Graham J. Hutchings^b(), 邝攀勇^a^,^b()

^a 中国地质大学(武汉)材料与化学学院, 太阳燃料实验室, 湖北武汉 430078, 中国
^b 卡迪夫大学化学学院, 马克斯普朗克-卡迪夫多相催化基础研究中心, 卡迪夫市, 英国
^c 瓦伦西亚理工大学, 化学技术研究所, 西班牙

收稿日期:2025-10-09 接受日期:2025-11-27 出版日期:2026-06-18 发布日期:2026-05-18
通讯作者: *电子信箱: kuangpanyong@cug.edu.cn (邝攀勇),
Hutchings@cardiff.ac.uk (G. J. Hutchings),
yujiaguo93@cug.edu.cn (余家国).
作者简介:
¹共同第一作者.
基金资助:
国家重点研发计划(2022YFE0115900);国家自然科学基金(22272153);国家自然科学基金(22479132);国家自然科学基金(22238009);国家自然科学基金(U23A20102);国家自然科学基金(22361142704);湖北省自然科学基金(2022CFA001);湖北省重点研发计划(2023BAB113)

In-situ reconstructed Cu-In₂O₃ electron-rich interfaces facilitate high selective CO₂-to-CO conversion at low potentials

Bin Yang^a^,¹, Ouardia Akdim^b^,¹, Chengcheng Yuan^a, Ruina Li^a, Luo Yu^a, Hermenegildo García^c, Jiaguo Yu^a(), Graham J. Hutchings^b(), Panyong Kuang^a^,^b()

^a Laboratory of Solar Fuel, Faculty of Materials Science and Chemistry, China University of Geosciences, Wuhan 430078, Hubei, China
^b Max Planck-Cardiff Centre on the Fundamentals of Heterogeneous Catalysis FUNCAT, Cardiff Catalysis Institute, School of Chemistry, Cardiff University, Translational Research Hub, Maindy Road, CF24 4HQ, Cardiff, UK
^c Instituto Universitario de Tecnología Química, (CSIC-UPV), Universitat Politècnica de València, Valencia, Spain

Received:2025-10-09 Accepted:2025-11-27 Online:2026-06-18 Published:2026-05-18
Contact: *E-mail: kuangpanyong@cug.edu.cn (P. Kuang),
Hutchings@cardiff.ac.uk (G. J. Hutchings),
yujiaguo93@cug.edu.cn (J. Yu).
About author:
¹Contributed equally to this work.
Supported by:
National Key Research and Development Program of China(2022YFE0115900);National Natural Science Foundation of China(22272153);National Natural Science Foundation of China(22479132);National Natural Science Foundation of China(22238009);National Natural Science Foundation of China(U23A20102);National Natural Science Foundation of China(22361142704);Natural Science Foundation of Hubei Province of China(2022CFA001);Key R&D Program Projects in Hubei Province(2023BAB113)

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

随着温室气体排放问题日益严峻, 电催化二氧化碳还原(CO₂RR)成为实现人工碳循环的重要途径之一. 将CO₂高选择性地还原为一氧化碳(CO)具备重要应用价值, CO是合成气与高附加值化学品合成的关键前驱体. 然而, CO₂还原面临COOH中间体形成动力学缓慢和竞争性析氢反应(HER)两大挑战. 金、银等贵金属催化性能优异但成本高昂; 铜基催化剂资源丰富、价格低廉, 但在低过电位下CO选择性低, 且HER占主导严重竞争消耗电子. 近年来, 构建金属-金属氧化物异质结构被证明是提升CO选择性的有效策略, 其中铜铟复合材料展现出潜力, 然而其界面协同作用的电子起源与低电位下高选择性机理尚不明确. 因此, 探究界面电子作用如何影响低电位下高CO选择性是本文的核心科学问题.

本研究致力于通过动态原位重构策略, 构建具有富电子界面的Cu/In₂O₃电催化剂, 以实现高效、高选择性的CO₂至CO转化. 研究重点在于探究重构后Cu-In₂O₃界面的电子结构特征及其对关键反应中间体(COOH, CO)形成与转化的影响机制, 从而揭示低电位下高CO选择性的本质原因, 为解决低电位下选择性难题提供理论基础与新途径. 采用共沉淀法合成CuO/In₂O₃前驱体, 使用X射线衍射(XRD)、X射线光电子能谱等对催化剂的物相组成、形貌结构与表面化学状态进行了系统表征. 为进一步追踪电催化过程中活性位点的动态演变, 采用原位X射线吸收精细结构与原位XRD, 监测铜物种在反应条件下的价态与结构变化. 同时, 结合紫外光电子能谱与霍尔效应测试, 分析界面的电子结构特性与载流子浓度分布. 通过原位衰减全反射表面增强红外光谱, 观测反应过程中关键中间体(如COOH和CO)的动态形成与转化行为. 此外, 采用密度泛函理论计算, 从原子层面揭示Cu/In₂O₃界面在降低反应能垒、优化中间体吸附/脱附行为中的作用机制, 为实验现象提供理论支撑. 结果表明, 在CO₂RR条件下, CuO/In₂O₃前驱体经历动态原位重构过程, 形成Cu纳米颗粒与In₂O₃紧密耦合的异质结构. 与纯CuO体系仅部分还原为Cu/Cu₂O混合物不同, In₂O₃的存在显著促进了CuO完全还原为Cu. 重构后的Cu/In₂O₃界面表现出明显的电子富集特征: 其功函数降至3.02 eV, 显著低于纯Cu(3.72 eV)和In₂O₃(4.32 eV), 同时Cu的d带中心上移, 增强了对CO₂的吸附与活化能力. 电催化性能显示, Cu/In₂O₃在H型电解池中于−0.5 至−0.9 V vs. RHE电位范围内, FE_CO高于90%, 在−0.6 V vs. RHE时达到峰值97.6%, 并在该电位下连续运行12 h后仍保持在95%以上, 展现出优异的电化学稳定性. 在流动池体系中, 该催化剂表现出更强的适应性与高电流密度运行能力, 即使在−0.2 V vs. RHE的超低电位下, FE_CO仍可维持在96.0%, 并在−0.9 V vs. RHE时实现277 mA cm^-2的CO分电流密度, 具备良好的实际应用潜力. 理论计算进一步阐明, Cu/In₂O₃界面可显著降低COOH的形成能垒, 并优化CO的脱附过程, 从而协同促进CO的高选择性生成, 抑制竞争性析氢.

综上, 本研究通过原位重构构建了富电子界面Cu/In₂O₃电催化剂, 实现低电位下高效高选择性的CO₂至CO转化. In₂O₃促进CuO完全还原并通过界面电子结构调控, 降低中间体能垒并抑制HER. 该工作揭示了富电子界面在提升CO₂RR性能中的关键作用, 为未来设计高效稳定的非贵金属催化剂提供了新思路和理论支撑, 推动电催化CO₂领域向高性能、低能耗方向发展.

关键词: 二氧化碳还原, 原位重构, Cu/In₂O₃复合材料, 富电子界面, 二氧化碳转化至一氧化碳

Abstract:

The electroreduction of CO₂ to CO is fundamentally hindered by sluggish COOH intermediate formation and the competing hydrogen evolution reaction. Herein, we show that this challenge can be addressed through the dynamic in-situ reconstruction of a CuO/In₂O₃ precursor under electrochemical CO₂ reduction conditions. By employing in-situ electrochemical spectroscopy techniques in combination with theoretical calculations, we demonstrate that the presence of In₂O₃ facilitates the complete reduction of CuO to metallic Cu. This in-situ reconstruction produces electron-rich Cu-In₂O₃ interfaces, characterized by a reduced work function and an upshifted Cu 3d-band center, which promote CO₂ activation and the formation of COOH/CO intermediates. Those interfacial properties lead to a pronounced electronic coupling that endows the electrocatalyst with high CO₂-to-CO selectivity at low potentials. Specifically, the optimised Cu/In₂O₃ achieves CO Faradaic efficiency above 90% across −0.5 to −0.9 V vs. the reversible hydrogen electrode, reaching 97.6% at −0.6 V in a H-type cell, and sustains a high CO selectivity of 96.0% even at an ultralow potential of −0.2 V in a flow-cell configuration. These findings underscore the crucial role of electron-rich interfaces in directing CO₂ reduction with exceptional selectivity and activity toward CO formation.

Key words: CO₂ reduction reaction, In-situ reconstruction, Cu/In₂O₃ composite, Electron-rich interface, CO₂-to-CO conversion

阳斌, Ouardia Akdim, 袁成成, 李睿娜, 余罗, Hermenegildo García, 余家国, Graham J. Hutchings, 邝攀勇. 原位重构构建Cu-In₂O₃富电子界面实现低电位下高选择性CO₂还原转化为CO[J]. 催化学报, 2026, 85: 117-129.

Bin Yang, Ouardia Akdim, Chengcheng Yuan, Ruina Li, Luo Yu, Hermenegildo García, Jiaguo Yu, Graham J. Hutchings, Panyong Kuang. In-situ reconstructed Cu-In₂O₃ electron-rich interfaces facilitate high selective CO₂-to-CO conversion at low potentials[J]. Chinese Journal of Catalysis, 2026, 85: 117-129.

×
扫码分享

导出引用管理器 EndNote|Ris|BibTeX

链接本文: https://www.cjcatal.com/CN/10.1016/S1872-2067(26)65017-6

https://www.cjcatal.com/CN/Y2026/V85/I6/117

图/表 5

Fig. 1. (a) Schematic illustration of the synthesis process. SEM images (b,c), TEM image (d), EDX images (e), HRTEM images (f-h), and XRD pattern (i) of CuO/In2O3.

Fig. 2. FE values for CO, H2, and other products on CuO/In2O3 (a), CuO (b), and In2O3 (c) in an H-cell configuration. (d) FECO and jCO of CuO/In2O3, CuO, and In2O3 at −0.6 V. (e) TOF of CuO/In2O3, CuO, and In2O3 at various applied potentials. (f) Long-term stability test of CuO/In2O3. (g) Schematic illustration of the flow-cell setup used for high current density CO2RR testing. (h) LSV curve of CuO/In2O3 in the flow-cell. (i) Corresponding FECO and jCO values of CuO/In2O3 in the flow-cell.

Fig. 3. (a) In-situ XRD patterns of CuO/In2O3 after electroreduction at −0.6, −0.9, and −1.2 V. SEM (b), TEM (c), EDX (d,e), and HRTEM (f-j) images of CuO/In2O3 after electroreduction at −0.9 V. (k) In-situ XRD patterns of CuO after electroreduction at −0.6, −0.9, and −1.2 V. SEM (l), TEM (m), EDX (n, o), and HRTEM (p-t) images of CuO after electroreduction at −0.9 V.

Fig. 4. In-situ Cu K-edge XANES and FT-EXAFS spectra of CuO/In2O3 (a,b) and CuO (c,d) after electroreduction at −0.6, −0.9, and −1.2 V. (e) Experimentally measured ϕ of Cu/In2O3, Cu, and In2O3. (f) Hall coefficient of Cu/In2O3 and Cu/Cu2O. (g) Schematic illustration of the in-situ reconstruction of CuO/In2O3 and CuO, highlighting the formation of Cu-In2O3 electron-rich interface and Cu-Cu2O interface, respectively.

Fig. 5. In-situ ATR-SEIRAS spectra of Cu/In2O3 (a), Cu/Cu2O (b), and In2O3 (c). The order of magnitude of the intensity is 10−4. (d) Integrated peak areas of *COOH and *CO vibrational bands. (e) Calculated reaction free energy diagrams for CO2-to-CO conversion on Cu/In2O3, Cu/Cu2O, and In2O3. (f) Δρ at the Cu-In2O3 electron-rich interface. (g) Theoretically calculated ϕ of Cu/In2O3, Cu/Cu2O, and In2O3. (h) DOS and εd of Cu/In2O3 and Cu/Cu2O. (i) Schematic illustration of orbital occupation engineering at the Cu/In2O3 interface to modulate bonding and antibonding states. (j) Conceptual diagram of enhanced CO2-to-CO conversion facilitated by the Cu-In2O3 electron-rich interface.

参考文献

[1]	P. Saha, S. Amanullah, A. Dey, Acc. Chem. Res., 2022, 55, 134-144.
[2]	R. Li F,. Xie P,. Kuang T,. Liu J. Yu, Small, 2024, 20, 2402867.
[3]	Z. Yin M,. Zhang Y,. Long H,. Lei X,. Li X.-P., Zhang W,. Zhang U.-P., Apfel R. Cao, Angew. Chem. Int. Ed., 2025, 64, e202500154.
[4]	R. Francke, B. Schille, M. Roemelt, Chem. Rev., 2018, 118, 4631-4701.
[5]	S. Jin Z,. Hao K,. Zhang Z,. Yan J. Chen, Angew. Chem. Int. Ed., 2021, 60, 20627-20648.
[6]	K. Guo X,. Li H,. Lei H,. Guo X,. Jin X.-P., Zhang W,. Zhang U.-P., Apfel R. Cao, Angew. Chem. Int. Ed., 2022, 61, e202209602.
[7]	C. Costentin, M. Robert, J.-M. Savéant, Chem. Soc. Rev., 2013, 42, 2423-2436.
[8]	M. Sayed, F. Xu, P. Kuang, J. Low, S. Wang, L. Zhang, J. Yu, Nat. Commun., 2021, 12, 4936.
[9]	R. Cao, ChemSusChem, 2022, 15, e202201788.
[10]	S.-J. Zheng, H. Cheng, J. Yu, Q. Bie, J.-D. Chen, F. Wang, R. Wu, D. J. Blackwood, J.-S. Chen, Rare Met., 2023, 42, 1800-1807.
[11]	R. S. Weber, ACS Catal., 2019, 9, 946-950.
[12]	C. Chen, J. F. Khosrowabadi Kotyk, S. W. Sheehan, Chem, 2018, 4, 2571-2586.
[13]	K. Fan Y,. Jia Y,. Ji P,. Kuang B,. Zhu X,. Liu J. Yu, ACS Catal., 2020, 10, 358-364.
[14]	R. Li C.-W., Tung B,. Zhu Y,. Lin F.-Z., Tian T,. Liu H.-M., Chen P,. Kuang J,. Yu J. Colloid Interface Sci., 2024, 674, 326-335.
[15]	J. Du Q.-Y., Lin J.-Q., Zhang S.-L., Hou A.-B. Chen, Rare Met., 2023, 42, 2284-2293.
[16]	S. Liu H,. Tao L,. Zeng Q,. Liu Z,. Xu Q,. Liu J.-L. Luo, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2017, 139, 2160-2163.
[17]	K. Ye T,. Liu Y,. Song Q,. Wang G. Wang, Appl. Catal. B, 2021, 296, 120342.
[18]	M. C. O,. Monteiro M. F., Philips K. J. P., Schouten M. T. M. Koper, Nat. Commun., 2021, 12, 4943.
[19]	R. Shi J,. Guo X,. Zhang G. I. N., Waterhouse Z,. Han Y,. Zhao L,. Shang C,. Zhou L,. Jiang T. Zhang, Nat. Commun., 2020, 11, 3028.
[20]	H. Huang, H. Jia, Z. Liu, P. Gao, J. Zhao, Z. Luo, J. Yang, J. Zeng, Angew. Chem. Int. Ed., 2017, 56, 3594-3598.
[21]	H. Sun D,. Li Y,. Min Y,. Wang Y,. Ma Y,. Zheng H. Huang, Acta Phys.-Chim. Sin., 2024, 40, 2307007.
[22]	W. Luo Q,. Zhang J,. Zhang E,. Moioli K,. Zhao A. Züttel, Appl. Catal. B Environ., 2020, 273, 119060.
[23]	M. P. L,. Kang M. J., Kolb F,. Calle-Vallejo B. S. Yeo, Adv. Funct. Mater., 2022, 32, 2111597.
[24]	B. Shao, H. Dong, Y. Gong, J. Mei, F. Cai, J. Liu, D. Zhong, T. Lu, Acta Phys.-Chim. Sin., 2024, 40, 2305026.
[25]	H. Dai T,. Song X,. Yue S,. Wei F,. Li Y,. Xu S,. Shu Z,. Cui C,. Wang J,. Gu L. Duan, Chin. J. Catal., 2024, 64, 123-132.
[26]	H. Yang, S. Li, Q. Xu, Chin. J. Catal., 2023, 48, 32-65.
[27]	Q. Bie H,. Yin Y,. Wang H,. Su Y,. Peng J. Li, Chin. J. Catal., 2024, 57, 96-104.
[28]	D. Xiang, K. Li, K. Miao, R. Long, Y. Xiong, X. Kang, Acta Phys.-Chim. Sin., 2024, 40, 2308027.
[29]	M. B. Ross, P., De Luna Y,. Li C.-T., Dinh D,. Kim P,. Yang E. H. Sargent, Nat. Catal., 2019, 2, 648-658.
[30]	C. Choi, S. Kwon, T. Cheng, M. Xu, P. Tieu, C. Lee, J. Cai, H. M. Lee, X. Pan, X. Duan, W. A. Goddard III, Y. Huang, Nat. Catal., 2020, 3, 804-812.
[31]	F. Xu B,. Feng Z,. Shen Y,. Chen L,. Jiao Y,. Zhang J,. Tian J,. Zhang X,. Wang L,. Yang Q,. Wu Z. Hu, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2024, 146, 9365-9374.
[32]	S. Nitopi, E. Bertheussen, S. B. Scott, X. Liu, A. K. Engstfeld, S. Horch, B. Seger, I. E. L. Stephens, K. Chan, C. Hahn, J. K. Nørskov, T. F. Jaramillo, I. Chorkendorff, Chem. Rev., 2019, 119, 7610-7672.
[33]	H.-Q. Fu, J. Liu, N. M. Bedford, Y. Wang, J.-W. Sun, Y. Zou, M. Dong, J. Wright, H. Diao, P. Liu, H.-G. Yang, H. Zhao, Adv. Mater., 2022, 34, 2202854.
[34]	W. Luo W,. Xie R,. Mutschler E,. Oveisi G. L., De Gregorio R,. Buonsanti A. Züttel, ACS Catal., 2018, 8, 6571-6581.
[35]	W. Guo X,. Sun C,. Chen D,. Yang L,. Lu Y,. Yang B. Han, Green Chem., 2019, 21, 503-508.
[36]	M. Zhang, Z. Zhang, Z. Zhao, H. Huang, D. H. Anjum, D. Wang, J.-H. He, K.-W. Huang, ACS Catal., 2021, 11, 11103-11108.
[37]	W. Liu H,. Li P,. Ou J,. Mao L,. Han J,. Song J,. Luo H. L. Xin, Nano Res., 2023, 16, 8729-8736.
[38]	Y. Wang, L. Cheng, Y. Zhu, J. Liu, C. Xiao, R. Chen, L. Zhang, Y. Li, C. Li, Appl. Catal. B, 2022, 317, 121650.
[39]	D.-D. Zhu, J.-L. Liu, S.-Z. Qiao, Adv. Mater., 2016, 28, 3423-3452.
[40]	D. Meng, J. Zheng, J. Guo, J. Gong, Z. Wang, Chem. Eng. J., 2024, 485, 150051.
[41]	A. Jedidi, S. Rasul, D. Masih, L. Cavallo, K. Takanabe, J. Mater. Chem. A, 2015, 3, 19085-19092.
[42]	Y. Jia H.-S., Hsu W.-C., Huang D.-W., Lee S.-W., Lee T.-Y., Chen L,. Zhou J.-H., Wang K.-W., Wang S. Dai, Nano Lett., 2023, 23, 2262-2268.
[43]	S. Rasul, D. H. Anjum, A. Jedidi, Y. Minenkov, L. Cavallo, K. Takanabe, Angew. Chem. Int. Ed., 2015, 54, 2146-2150.
[44]	W. Li Y,. Yang Z,. Weng S,. Huo J. CO₂ Util., 2021, 46, 101470.
[45]	Z. Li Y,. Pei R,. Ma Y,. Wang Y,. Zhu M,. Yang J,. Wang J. Mater. Chem. A, 2021, 9, 13109-13114.
[46]	W. Zhang, L. Yang, Z. Li, G. Nie, X. Cao, Z. Fang, X. Wang, S. Ramakrishna, Y. Long, L. Jiao, Angew. Chem. Int. Ed., 2024, 63, e202400888.
[47]	M. Zhang, K. Song, C. Liu, Z. Zhang, W.-Q. He, H. Huang, J. Liu, J. Colloid Interface Sci., 2023, 650, 193-202.
[48]	K. Cheng, S. Li, Q. Cheng, L. Zhang, Y. Jiang, F. Li, H. Ma, D. Zhang, Adv. Funct. Mater., 2025, 35, 2417914.
[49]	J. Zhang, H. Zhang, Y. Huang, Appl. Catal. B, 2021, 297, 120453.
[50]	H. Jung, S. Y. Lee, C. W. Lee, M. K. Cho, D. H. Won, C. Kim, H.-S. Oh, B. K. Min, Y. J. Hwang, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2019, 141, 4624-4633.
[51]	H. Huang, K. Yue, C. Liu, K. Zhan, H. Dong, Y. Yan, Small, 2024, 20, 2400441.
[52]	S. Chu C,. Kang W,. Park Y,. Han S,. Hong L,. Hao H,. Zhang T. W. B., Lo A. W., Robertson Y,. Jung B,. Han Z. Sun, SmartMat, 2022, 3, 194-205.
[53]	R. He X,. Luo L,. Li Y,. Zhang L,. Peng N,. Xu J,. Qiao J. Colloid Interface Sci., 2024, 658, 1016-1024.
[54]	R. Yang, J. Duan, P. Dong, Q. Wen, M. Wu, Y. Liu, Y. Liu, H. Li, T. Zhai, Angew. Chem. Int. Ed., 2022, 61, e202116706.
[55]	P.-F. Sui, S. Liu, C. Xu, J. Xiao, N. Duan, R. Feng, J.-L. Luo, Chem. Eng. J., 2022, 427, 131654.
[56]	L. Bai F,. Franco J,. Timoshenko C,. Rettenmaier F,. Scholten H. S., Jeon A,. Yoon M,. Rüscher A,. Herzog F. T., Haase S,. Kühl S. W., Chee A,. Bergmann R. C. Beatriz, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2024, 146, 9665-9678.
[57]	C. Liu Y,. Wu K,. Sun J,. Fang A,. Huang Y,. Pan W.-C., Cheong Z,. Zhuang Z,. Zhuang Q,. Yuan H. L., Xin C,. Zhang J,. Zhang H,. Xiao C,. Chen Y. Li, Chem, 2021, 7, 1297-1307.
[58]	W. Li Z,. Ni O,. Akdim T,. Liu B,. Zhu P,. Kuang J. Yu, Adv. Mater., 2025, 37, 2503742.
[59]	C. Zhu B,. Liu R. Li, Acta Phys.-Chim. Sin., 2025, 41, 100146.
[60]	X. Yang, J. Cheng, X. Yang, Y. Xu, W. Sun, J. Zhou, Chem. Eng. J., 2022, 431, 134171.
[61]	Y. Yin Z,. Ling S,. Liu J,. Jiao Y,. Wang Y,. Peng X,. Tong M,. Zhou R,. Feng X,. Xing Y,. Xu Q,. Zhu X,. Sun M,. Luo X,. Kang B. Han, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2025, 147, 25584-25591.
[62]	C. Zhu D,. Wang L,. Zeng G,. Feng Y,. Liang W,. Zheng W,. Lin X,. Peng Z,. Liu X,. Sang B,. Yang Z,. Li Q,. Zhang L,. Lei Y. Hou, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2025, 147, 26185-26194.
[63]	F. Vigier, C. Coutanceau, F. Hahn, E. M. Belgsir, C. Lamy, J. Electroanal. Chem., 2004, 563, 81-89.
[64]	Q. Wang, K. Liu, K. Hu, C. Cai, H. Li, H. Li, M. Herran, Y.-R. Lu, T.-S. Chan, C. Ma, J. Fu, S. Zhang, Y. Liang, E. Cortés, M. Liu, Nat. Commun., 2022, 13, 6082.
[65]	J.-K. Li, J.-P. Dong, S.-S. Liu, Y. Hua, X.-L. Zhao, Z. Li, S.-N. Zhao, S.-Q. Zang, R. Wang, Angew. Chem. Int. Ed., 2024, 63, e202412144.

原位重构构建Cu-In₂O₃富电子界面实现低电位下高选择性CO₂还原转化为CO

In-situ reconstructed Cu-In₂O₃ electron-rich interfaces facilitate high selective CO₂-to-CO conversion at low potentials

RichHTML

PDF

Supporting Information

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

扫码分享

图/表 5

参考文献

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

[1]	郭威, 莫贞林, 徐来季, 章宇, 杨明辉, 刘宝军. 具有供体-桥接效应的高熵合金FeCoNiCuPt用于增强二氧化碳和硝酸盐的尿素电合成[J]. 催化学报, 2026, 84(5): 159-174.
[2]	魏滔, 梁展鹏, 张博心, 徐赟浩, 孙兆雪, 多名昊, 陈铭晖, 张生, 张宝. 基于4-二甲氨基吡啶(DMAP)亲核催化剂构建结晶性聚金属酞菁基共价有机框架用于高效电催化CO₂还原[J]. 催化学报, 2026, 83(4): 319-329.
[3]	殷付豪, 张迁宇, 徐茂, 魏书朋, 李翊, 陈鹏作, 赵彦英, 李本侠. 锚定在有序大孔In₂O₃中的协同Pd物种促进太阳能驱动的CO₂和H₂O转化[J]. 催化学报, 2026, 82(3): 238-250.
[4]	黄立挺, 周业成, 伦永烽, 王琪, 丁朝斌, 宋树芹, 王毅. 配体尾部基团对金纳米团簇电化学CO₂还原过程的影响[J]. 催化学报, 2026, 81(2): 195-205.
[5]	向家奇, 陈立妙, 陈善勇, 刘又年. 电化学二氧化碳还原中的碱阳离子效应[J]. 催化学报, 2026, 80(1): 38-58.
[6]	肖丽媛, 王振旅, 管景奇. 多核金属有机框架材料在电催化中的研究进展[J]. 催化学报, 2026, 80(1): 59-91.
[7]	白雪, 唐甜蜜, 孙婧茹, 白福全, 胡静, 管景奇. 锌掺杂调控羟基氧化铜的d带结构以提升其CO₂电还原性能[J]. 催化学报, 2026, 80(1): 248-257.
[8]	陈鸿境, 李月英, 陈敏, 解仲凯, 施伟东. 硫电子桥介导CuInS₂/CuS异质结构实现高选择性CO₂光还原为C₂H₄[J]. 催化学报, 2025, 75(8): 180-191.
[9]	孙静涵, 许峥嵘, 刘邓, 孔爱国, 张其春, 刘睿. 簇状Bi₂₈O₃₂(SO₄)₁₀原位Bi晶格畸变增强电催化CO₂还原为甲酸[J]. 催化学报, 2025, 72(5): 199-210.
[10]	戴昊, 宋涛, 乐弦, 李福智, 魏淑婷, 徐延超, 舒偲妍, 崔子昂, 王成, 顾均, 段乐乐. 含氮石墨炔上构建Cu-N₂单原子电催化剂用于CO₂还原制CH₄[J]. 催化学报, 2024, 64(9): 123-132.
[11]	王佳琳, 张凯妮, Ta Thi Thuy Nga, 王亦清, 石玉川, 魏代星, 董崇礼, 沈少华. 具有非对称配位结构的硫族杂原子掺杂Ni-N-C单原子催化剂及其电化学二氧化碳还原性能[J]. 催化学报, 2024, 64(9): 54-65.
[12]	梅子雯, 陈克军, 谭耀, 刘秋文, 陈琴, 王其忧, 汪喜庆, 蔡超, 刘康, 傅俊伟, 刘敏. 从富含缺陷的碳载体到酞菁钴的质子供给用于增强CO₂电还原[J]. 催化学报, 2024, 62(7): 190-197.
[13]	朱鸿睿, 徐慧民, 黄陈金, 张志杰, 詹麒尼, 帅婷玉, 李高仁. 光电催化析氧和CO₂还原反应催化剂的研究进展[J]. 催化学报, 2024, 62(7): 53-107.
[14]	黄浩铭, 林清清, 牛青, 宁江淇, 李留义, 毕进红, 于岩. 基于共价有机框架非金属位点的光催化CO₂还原[J]. 催化学报, 2024, 60(5): 201-208.
[15]	王超琛, 葛旺鑫, 唐雷, 齐宴宾, 董磊, 江宏亮, 沈建华, 朱以华, 李春忠. 单原子修饰原子簇的多配位Cu基催化剂上CO₂高选择性电还原CO的研究[J]. 催化学报, 2024, 59(4): 324-333.