MFI/MEL分子筛催化甲醇制烯烃反应关键参数的集成方法

doi:10.1016/S1872-2067(21)63990-6

催化学报 ›› 2022, Vol. 43 ›› Issue (7): 1879-1893.DOI: 10.1016/S1872-2067(21)63990-6

MFI/MEL分子筛催化甲醇制烯烃反应关键参数的集成方法

Chuncheng Liu^a^,^d, Evgeny A. Uslamin^a, Sophie H. van Vreeswijk^c, Irina Yarulina^b, Swapna Ganapathy^c, Bert M. Weckhuysen^c, Freek Kapteijn^d^,^*(), Evgeny A. Pidko^a^,^#()

^a代尔夫特理工大学化学工程系, 无机系统工程, 代尔夫特, 荷兰
^b巴斯夫股份公司, 工艺研究和化学工程, 路德维希港, 德国
^c乌特勒克大学德拜纳米材料科学研究所, 无机化学与催化, 乌特勒克, 荷兰
^d代尔夫特理工大学化工系, 催化工程系, 代尔夫特, 荷兰

收稿日期:2021-11-08 接受日期:2021-12-04 出版日期:2022-07-18 发布日期:2022-05-20
通讯作者: Freek Kapteijn,Evgeny A. Pidko

An integrated approach to the key parameters in methanol-to-olefins reaction catalyzed by MFI/MEL zeolite materials

Chuncheng Liu^a^,^d, Evgeny A. Uslamin^a, Sophie H. van Vreeswijk^c, Irina Yarulina^b, Swapna Ganapathy^c, Bert M. Weckhuysen^c, Freek Kapteijn^d^,^*(), Evgeny A. Pidko^a^,^#()

^aInorganic Systems Engineering, Department of Chemical Engineering, Delft University of Technology, Van der Maasweg 9, 2629 HZ Delft, the Netherlands
^bBASF SE, Process Research and Chemical Engineering, Ludwigshafen 67056, Germany
^cInorganic Chemistry and Catalysis, Debye Institute for Nanomaterials Science, Utrecht University, Universiteitsweg 99, 3854 CG Utrecht, the Netherlands
^dCatalysis Engineering, Department of Chemical Engineering, Delft University of Technology, Van der Maasweg 9, 2629 HZ Delft, the Netherlands

Received:2021-11-08 Accepted:2021-12-04 Online:2022-07-18 Published:2022-05-20
Contact: Freek Kapteijn, Evgeny A. Pidko
Supported by:
BASF and the Advanced Research Center Chemical Building Blocks Consortium (ARC CBBC) for Funding under Project(2016.007.TUD)

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

了解与关键催化性能参数(如选择性和稳定性)相关的催化剂特性对于合理设计催化剂是非常重要的. 本文重点考察了甲醇制烯烃(MTO)过程中MFI、MEL及其共生沸石分子筛的催化行为和构效关系. 表征结果表明, 丙烯和丁烯的高产率和MeOH的高转化率均与Pentasil分子筛结构中晶格Al位的富集相关, 这也被27Al MAS NMR结果和3-甲基戊烷裂解结果证实. 催化剂对MTO反应的催化性能与其晶体尺寸、外部B酸中心和铝配对等性质之间缺乏相关性, 表明它们对提高丙烯选择性的作用不大. 本文分析表明, 催化剂失活非常复杂, 受交叉点处晶格铝富集、总铝含量和晶体尺寸影响较大, 且MFI和MEL相共生加速了催化剂失活.

关键词: 构效关系, 分子筛催化, 甲醇制烯烃, 铝分布, 酸性, 共生MFI/MEL, Pentasil分子筛

Abstract:

Identification of the catalyst characteristics correlating with the key performance parameters including selectivity and stability is key to the rational catalyst design. Herein we focused on the identification of property-performance relationships in the methanol-to-olefin (MTO) process by studying in detail the catalytic behaviour of MFI, MEL and their respective intergrowth zeolites. The detailed material characterization reveals that both the high production of propylene and butylenes and the large MeOH conversion capacity correlate with the enrichment of lattice Al sites in the channels of the pentasil structure as identified by ²⁷Al MAS NMR and 3-methylpentane cracking results. The lack of correlation between MTO performance and other catalyst characteristics, such as crystal size, presence of external Brønsted acid sites and Al pairing suggests their less pronounced role in defining the propylene selectivity. Our analysis reveals that catalyst deactivation is rather complex and is strongly affected by the enrichment of lattice Al in the intersections, the overall Al-content, and crystal size. The intergrowth of MFI and MEL phases accelerates the catalyst deactivation rate.

Key words: Structure-performance relationship, Zeolite catalysis, Methanol-to-olefin conversion, Al-distribution, Acidity, Intergrowth MFI/MEL, Pentasil

Chuncheng Liu, Evgeny A. Uslamin, Sophie H. van Vreeswijk, Irina Yarulina, Swapna Ganapathy, Bert M. Weckhuysen, Freek Kapteijn, Evgeny A. Pidko. MFI/MEL分子筛催化甲醇制烯烃反应关键参数的集成方法[J]. 催化学报, 2022, 43(7): 1879-1893.

Chuncheng Liu, Evgeny A. Uslamin, Sophie H. van Vreeswijk, Irina Yarulina, Swapna Ganapathy, Bert M. Weckhuysen, Freek Kapteijn, Evgeny A. Pidko. An integrated approach to the key parameters in methanol-to-olefins reaction catalyzed by MFI/MEL zeolite materials[J]. Chinese Journal of Catalysis, 2022, 43(7): 1879-1893.

×
扫码分享

导出引用管理器 EndNote|Ris|BibTeX

链接本文: https://www.cjcatal.com/CN/10.1016/S1872-2067(21)63990-6

https://www.cjcatal.com/CN/Y2022/V43/I7/1879

图/表 10

Fig. 1. XRD data comparing patterns for investigated samples (a), and a highlighted 21°-26° range (b).

Table 1 Summarized textural and acidic properties of studied catalysts.

Catalyst	Si/Al ^a	Size ^b	V_total^c	V_micro^c	S_ext^c	S_BET^d	BAS ^e	LAS ^e
Catalyst	(mol mol^-1)	(Å)	(cm³/g)	(cm³/g)	(m²/g)	(m²/g)	(µmol/g)	(µmol/g)
MEL-25-S	27	419	0.31	0.14	85	439	543	90
MFI/MEL-25-S	25	463	0.31	0.15	81	448	556	139
MFI-25-M	26	613	0.22	0.17	56	414	575	94
MFI-25-S	25	428	0.27	0.16	67	453	530	74
MFI/MEL-50-L	48	830	0.19	0.16	27	423	376	72
MFI-50-S	50	428	0.29	0.16	77	471	338	91

Fig. 2. MeOH conversion as a function of cumulative MeOH throughput (a) and cumulative carbon yields of different hydrocarbons until MeOH conversion is at 50% (color bars) and estimated conversion capacity (symbols to right axis) (b) for all studied catalysts in MTO tests. Reaction conditions: T = 450 °C, mcat = 40 mg (150-212 µm), 1 bar, WHSV = 5.2 gMeOH/gcat/h, carrier gas N2 = 50 mL/min. The full picture of MeOH conversion and product selectivity curves as a function of TOS are presented in Fig. S5.

Fig. 3. Carbon selectivity to propylene (a) and ethylene (b) as a function of MeOH conversion over studied materials. Reaction conditions: Reaction conditions: T = 450 °C, mcat = 40 mg (150-212 µm), 1 bar, WHSV = 5.2 gMeOH/gcat/h, carrier gas N2 = 50 mL/min. Similar graphs of other product groups are presented in Fig. S6.

Fig. 4. Time-resolved operando UV-vis spectra during MeOH conversion at 450 °C over studied catalysts. All spectra were collected during TOS within 0-1 h with 1 min interval. Band Assignments in the 40000-12500 cm-1 are displayed in UV-vis spectra for MFI-25-M [58,59].

Fig. 5. MeOH conversion capacity as a function of 1,3,5-TIPB conversion over catalysts at 200 °C. Cracking conditions: T = 200 °C, mcat = 20 mg (150-212 µm), 1 bar, P1,3,5-TIPB = 0.3 kPa, carrier gas N2 = 50 mL/min. Cracking conversion was averaged within TOS = 0.1-0.3 h. The full picture of 1,3,5-TIPB conversion as a function of TOS were present in Fig. S9.

Fig. 6. Selectivity to propylene (a) and MeOH conversion capacity (b) versus the proportion of Alpair of tested samples. Alpair is measured based on Co concentration determined by ICP-AES after Co ion exchange.

Fig. 7. 2D 27Al MQ MAS NMR spectrum of MEL-25-S (a), MFI-25-M (b), and MFI/MEL-25-S (c) together with the isotopic projection F1 spectrum at the left and the corresponding 27Al MAS NMR spectrum at the top of the 2D contour profile.

Table 2 The fraction of various peaks obtained from the 27Al MAS NMR spectrum.

Catalyst	Al_intersection/%	Al_channel/%	Characteristic peaks proportion/%
Catalyst	Al_intersection/%	Al_channel/%	58±0.3 ppm	56±0.2 ppm	55±0.5 ppm	53±0.4 ppm	52±0.3 ppm
MEL-25-S	46.4	53.6	11.1	24.0	29.6	24.1	11.2
MFI-25-S	47.9	52.1	9.0	28.6	24.2	23.6	14.7
MFI/MEL-25-S	48.7*	51.3*	14.2	25.0	28.6	24.1	8.2
MFI-25-M	49.3	50.7	11.7	25.5	24.8	25.3	12.7
MFI-50-S	47.0	53.0	8.0	26.9	25.5	26.1	13.5
MFI/MEL-50-L	45.2*	54.8*	15.3	32.1	31.8	18.3	2.5

Fig. 8. Carbon selectivity to propylene versus selectivity towards hydrogen, methane and ethane of 3-MP monomolecular cracking over samples with Si/Al of 25 (a) and Si/Al of 50 (b). 3-MP cracking conditions: T = 400 °C, mcat = 20 mg (150-212 µm), 1 bar, carrier gas N2 = 50 mL/min, 3-MP partial pressure = 3.8 kPa in the presence of 2,4-DMQ (<0.1 kPa). The product selectivity is averaged values within TOS = 0.1-0.4 h. The full-scale picture along TOS is given in Fig. S13.

参考文献

[1]	G. A. Olah, Angew. Chem. Int. Ed., 2005, 44, 2636-2639.
[2]	G. A. Olah, A. Goeppert, G. S. Prakash, J. Org. Chem., 2008, 74, 487-498.
[3]	F. M. Mota, D. H. Kim, Chem. Soc. Rev., 2019, 48, 205-259.
[4]	F. J. Keil, Microporous Mesoporous Mater., 1999, 29, 49-66.
[5]	P. Tian, Y. Wei, M. Ye, Z. Liu, ACS Catal., 2015, 5, 1922-1938.
[6]	Z. Xie, J. Liu, S. Zhong, H. Zhang, Process for producing light olefins from methanol or dimethyl ether, U.S.P.a.T. Office, Editor. 2014, China Petroleum and Chemical Corp Sinopec Shanghai Research Institute of Petrochemical Technology.
[7]	S. Svelle, F. Joensen, J. Nerlov, U. Olsbye, K.-P. Lillerud, S. Kolboe, M. Bjørgen, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2006, 128, 14770-14771.
[8]	S. Xu, A. Zheng, Y. Wei, J. Chen, J. Li, Y. Chu, M. Zhang, Q. Wang, Y. Zhou, J. Wang, F. Deng, Z. Liu, Angew. Chem. Int. Ed., 2013, 52, 11564-11568.
[9]	U. Olsbye, S. Svelle, K. Lillerud, Z. Wei, Y. Chen, J. Li, J. Wang, W. Fan, Chem. Soc. Rev., 2015, 44, 7155-7176.
[10]	X. Wu, S. Xu, W. Zhang, J. Huang, J. Li, B. Yu, Y. Wei, Z. Liu, Angew. Chem. Int. Ed., 2017, 56, 9039-9043.
[11]	C. Li, C. Paris, J. Martinez-Triguero, M. Boronat, M. Moliner, A. Corma, Nat. Catal., 2018, 1, 547-554.
[12]	I. Yarulina, K. De Wispelaere, S. Bailleul, J. Goetze, M. Radersma, E. Abou-Hamad, I. Vollmer, M. Goesten, B. Mezari, E. J. M. Hensen, J. S. Martínez-Espín, M. Morten, S. Mitchell, J. Perez-Ramirez, U. Olsbye, B. M. Weckhuysen, V. Van Speybroeck, F. Kapteijn, J. Gascon, Nat. Chem., 2018, 10, 804-812.
[13]	D. M. McCann, D. Lesthaeghe, P. W. Kletnieks, D. R. Guenther, M. J. Hayman, V. Van Speybroeck, M. Waroquier, J. F. Haw, Angew. Chem. Int. Ed., 2008, 47, 5179-5182.
[14]	S. Ilias, A. Bhan, J. Catal., 2012, 290, 186-192.
[15]	A. Hwang, A. Bhan, Acc. Chem. Res., 2019, 52, 2647-2656.
[16]	I. Yarulina, A. D. Chowdhury, F. Meirer, B. M. Weckhuysen, J. Gascon, Nat. Catal., 2018, 1, 398-411.
[17]	M. Stöcker, Microporous Mesoporous Mater., 1999, 29, 3-48.
[18]	U. Olsbye, S. Svelle, M. Bjørgen, P. Beato, T. V. W. Janssens, F. Joensen, S. Bordiga, K. P. Lillerud, Angew. Chem. Int. Ed., 2012, 51, 5810-5831.
[19]	S. Ilias, A. Bhan, ACS Catal., 2013, 3, 18-31.
[20]	M. Bjørgen, U. Olsbye, D. Petersen, S. Kolboe, J. Catal., 2004, 221, 1-10.
[21]	W. Song, H. Fu, J. F. Haw, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2001, 123, 4749-4754.
[22]	U. Olsbye, S. Svelle, M. Bjørgen, P. Beato, T. V. Janssens, F. Joensen, S. Bordiga, K. P. Lillerud, Angew. Chem. Int. Ed., 2012, 51, 5810-5831.
[23]	S. Svelle, F. Joensen, J. Nerlov, U. Olsbye, K.-P. Lillerud, S. Kolboe, M. Bjørgen, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2006, 128, 14770-14771.
[24]	S. Ilias, R. Khare, A. Malek, A. Bhan, J. Catal., 2013, 303, 135-140.
[25]	R. Khare, Z. Liu, Y. Han, A. Bhan, J. Catal., 2017, 348, 300-305.
[26]	R. Wei, C. Li, C. Yang, H. Shan, J. Nat. Gas Chem., 2011, 20, 261-265.
[27]	N. Danilina, F. Krumeich, S. A. Castelanelli, J. A. van Bokhoven, J. Phys. Chem. C, 2010, 114, 6640-6645.
[28]	V. Pashkova, S. Sklenak, P. Klein, M. Urbanova, J. Dedecek, Chem. Eur. J., 2016, 22, 3937-3941.
[29]	B. Smit, T. L. Maesen, Nature, 2008, 451, 671-678.
[30]	B. P. Hereijgers, F. Bleken, M. H. Nilsen, S. Svelle, K.-P. Lillerud, M. Bjørgen, B. M. Weckhuysen, U. Olsbye, J. Catal., 2009, 264, 77-87.
[31]	M. Dyballa, P. Becker, D. Trefz, E. Klemm, A. Fischer, H. Jakob, M. Hunger, Appl. Catal. A, 2016, 510, 233-243.
[32]	Q. Yu, C. Cui, Q. Zhang, J. Chen, Y. Li, J. Sun, C. Li, Q. Cui, C. Yang, H. Shan, J. Energy Chem., 2013, 22, 761-768.
[33]	S. Wang, P. Wang, Z. Qin, Y. Chen, M. Dong, J. Li, K. Zhang, P. Liu, J. Wang, W. Fan, ACS Catal., 2018, 8, 5485-5505.
[34]	M. Dyballa, U. Obenaus, M. Rosenberger, A. Fischer, H. Jakob, E. Klemm, M. Hunger, Microporous Mesoporous Mater., 2016, 233, 26-30.
[35]	S. Teketel, U. Olsbye, K. P. Lillerud, P. Beato, S. Svelle, Appl. Catal. A, 2015, 494, 68-76.
[36]	J. Wang, Y. Wei, J. Li, S. Xu, W. Zhang, Y. He, J. Chen, M. Zhang, A. Zheng, F. Deng, Catal. Sci. Technol., 2016, 6, 89-97.
[37]	C. Baerlocher, L. B. McCusker, Database of Zeolite Structures: http://www.iza-structure.org/databases, 2019.
[38]	G. R. Millward, S. Ramdas, J. M. Thomas, M. T. Barlow, J. Chem. Soc., Faraday Trans. 2, 1983, 79, 1075-1082.
[39]	M. Conte, B. Xu, T. E. Davies, J. K. Bartley, A. F. Carley, S. H. Taylor, K. Khalid, G. J. Hutchings, Microporous Mesoporous Mater., 2012, 164, 207-213.
[40]	J. Zhong, J. Han, Y. Wei, Z. Liu, J. Catal., 2021, 396, 23-31.
[41]	C. Emeis, J. Catal., 1993, 141, 347-354.
[42]	T. Yokoi, H. Mochizuki, S. Namba, J. N. Kondo, T. Tatsumi, J. Phys. Chem. C, 2015, 119, 15303-15315.
[43]	L. Petrakis, J. Chem. Edu., 1967, 44, 432-436.
[44]	K. Chen, Int. J. Mol. Sci., 2020, 21, 5666.
[45]	J. Holzinger, P. Beato, L. F. Lundegaard, J. Skibsted, J. Phys. Chem. C, 2018, 122, 15595-15613.
[46]	T. Liang, J. Chen, Z. Qin, J. Li, P. Wang, S. Wang, G. Wang, M. Dong, W. Fan, J. Wang, ACS Catal., 2016, 6, 7311-7325.
[47]	J. Dedecek, E. Tabor, S. Sklenak, ChemSusChem, 2019, 12, 556-576.
[48]	J. Dedecek, D. Kaucky, B. Wichterlova, Microporous Mesoporous Mater., 2000, 35-36, 483-494.
[49]	J. Dedecek, D. Kaucky, B. Wichterlova, O. Gonsiorova, Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys., 2002, 4, 5406-5413.
[50]	A. A. Verberckmoes, B. M. Weckhuysen, R. A. Schoonheydt, Microporous Mesoporous Mater., 1998, 22, 165-178.
[51]	E. Tabor, M. Bernauer, B. Wichterlova, J. Dedecek, Catal. Sci. Technol., 2019, 9, 4262-4275.
[52]	S. Namba, S. Nakanishi, T. Yashima, J. Catal., 1984, 88, 505-508.
[53]	S. Namba, A. Inaka, T. Yashima, Zeolites, 1986, 6, 107-110.
[54]	H. Krannila, W. O. Haag, B. C. Gates, J. Catal., 1992, 135, 115-124.
[55]	W. O. Haag, R. M. Lago, P. B. Weisz, Faraday Discus. Chem. Soc., 1981, 72, 317-330.
[56]	V. J. Frillette, W. O. Haag, R. M. Lago, J. Catal., 1981, 67, 218-222.
[57]	T. V. W. Janssens, J. Catal., 2009, 264, 130-137.
[58]	J. Goetze, F. Meirer, I. Yarulina, J. Gascon, F. Kapteijn, J. Ruiz-Martínez, B. M. Weckhuysen, ACS Catal., 2017, 7, 4033-4046.
[59]	E. Borodina, H. Sharbini Harun Kamaluddin, F. Meirer, M. Mokhtar, A. M. Asiri, S. Al-Thabaiti, S. N. Basahel, J. Ruiz-Martinez, B. Weckhuysen, ACS Catal., 2017, 7, 5268-5281.
[60]	T. X. Nijhuis, S. J. Tinnemans, T. Visser, B. M. Weckhuysen, Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys., 2003, 5, 4361-4365.
[61]	S. Bordiga, C. Lamberti, F. Bonino, A. Travert, F. Thibault-Starzyk, Chem. Soc. Rev., 2015, 44, 7262-7341.
[62]	P. Nachtigall, M. R. Delgado, D. Nachtigallova, C. O. Areán, Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys., 2012, 14, 1552-1569.
[63]	S. M. T. Almutairi, B. Mezari, E. A. Pidko, P. C. M. M. Magusin, E. J. M. Hensen, J. Catal., 2013, 307, 194-203.
[64]	A. A. Gabrienko, I. G. Danilova, S. S. Arzumanov, L. V. Pirutko, D. Freude, A. G. Stepanov, J. Phys. Chem. C, 2018, 122, 25386-25395.
[65]	J. Dwyer, F. Fitch, E. Nkang, J. Phys. Chem., 1983, 87, 5402-5404.
[66]	C. Liu, G. Li, E. J. Hensen, E. A. Pidko, J. Catal., 2016, 344, 570-577.
[67]	N. Wang, Y. Zhi, Y. Wei, W. Zhang, Z. Liu, J. Huang, T. Sun, S. Xu, S. Lin, Y. He, Nat. Commun., 2020, 11, 1079.
[68]	S. Hu, J. Shan, Q. Zhang, Y. Wang, Y. Liu, Y. Gong, Z. Wu, T. Dou, Appl. Catal. A, 2012, 445-446, 215-220.
[69]	M. Y. Jeon, D. Kim, P. Kumar, P. S. Lee, N. Rangnekar, P. Bai, M. Shete, B. Elyassi, H. S. Lee, K. Narasimharao, Nature, 2017, 543, 690-694.
[70]	C. Mei, P. Wen, Z. Liu, H. Liu, Y. Wang, W. Yang, Z. Xie, W. Hua, Z. Gao, J. Catal., 2008, 258, 243-249.
[71]	L. Wu, V. Degirmenci, P. C. M. M. Magusin, N. J. H. G. M. Lousberg, E. J. M. Hensen, J. Catal., 2013, 298, 27-40.
[72]	F. L. Bleken, S. Chavan, U. Olsbye, M. Boltz, F. Ocampo, B. Louis, Appl. Catal. A, 2012, 447-448, 178-185.
[73]	S. Teketel, W. Skistad, S. Benard, U. Olsbye, K. P. Lillerud, P. Beato, S. Svelle, ACS Catal., 2012, 2, 26-37.
[74]	R. Khare, D. Millar, A. Bhan, J. Catal., 2015, 321, 23-31.
[75]	B. Arstad, S. Kolboe, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2001, 123, 8137-8138.
[76]	M. Bjørgen, F. Bonino, B. Arstad, S. Kolboe, K. P. Lillerud, A. Zecchina, S. Bordiga, ChemPhysChem, 2005, 6, 232-235.
[77]	J. Goetze, B. M. Weckhuysen, Catal. Sci. Technol., 2018, 8, 1632-1644.
[78]	C. Wang, J. Xu, G. Qi, Y. Gong, W. Wang, P. Gao, Q. Wang, N. Feng, X. Liu, F. Deng, J. Catal., 2015, 332, 127-137.
[79]	L. Palumbo, F. Bonino, P. Beato, M. Bjørgen, A. Zecchina, S. Bordiga, J. Phys. Chem. C, 2008, 112, 9710-9716.
[80]	M. Bjørgen, S. Svelle, F. Joensen, J. Nerlov, S. Kolboe, F. Bonino, L. Palumbo, S. Bordiga, U. Olsbye, J. Catal., 2007, 249, 195-207.
[81]	D. Mores, E. Stavitski, M. H. F. Kox, J. Kornatowski, U. Olsbye, B. M. Weckhuysen, Chem. Eur. J., 2008, 14, 11320-11327.
[82]	C. Li, A. Vidal-Moya, P. J. Miguel, J. Dedecek, M. Boronat, A. Corma, ACS Catal., 2018, 8, 7688-7697.
[83]	O. H. Han, C.-S. Kim, S. B. Hong, Angew. Chem. Int. Ed., 2002, 41, 469-472.
[84]	J. Dedecek, Z. Sobalík, B. Wichterlová Catal. Rev. Sci. Eng., 2012, 54, 135-223.
[85]	S. Wang, Y. Chen, Z. Wei, Z. Qin, H. Ma, M. Dong, J. Li, W. Fan, J. Wang, J. Phys. Chem. C, 2015, 119, 28482-28498.
[86]	P. Sarv, C. Fernandez, J.-P. Amoureux, K. Keskinen, J. Phys. Chem., 1996, 100, 19223-19226.
[87]	J. Dedecek, M. J. Lucero, C. Li, F. Gao, P. Klein, M. Urbanova, Z. Tvaruzkova, P. Sazama, S. Sklenak, J. Phys. Chem. C, 2011, 115, 11056-11064.
[88]	K. Kubo, H. Iida, S. Namba, A. Igarashi, J. Japan Petroleum Institute, 2018, 61, 10-19.
[89]	T. Imyen, W. Wannapakdee, J. Limtrakul, C. Wattanakit, Fuel, 2019, 254, 115593.
[90]	P. Voogd, H. Van Bekkum, Appl. Catal., 1990, 59, 311-331.
[91]	M. Zhang, M. Wang, B. Xu, D. Ma, Joule, 2019, 3, 2876-2883.
[92]	F. Bleken, W. Skistad, K. Barbera, M. Kustova, S. Bordiga, P. Beato, K. P. Lillerud, S. Svelle, U. Olsbye, Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys., 2011, 13, 2539-2549.
[93]	S. Teketel, U. Olsbye, K.-P. Lillerud, P. Beato, S. Svelle, Microporous Mesoporous Mater., 2010, 136, 33-41.
[94]	Z. Liu, Y. Chu, X. Tang, L. Huang, G. Li, X. Yi, A. Zheng, J. Phys. Chem. C, 2017, 121, 22872-22882.
[95]	A. K. Jamil, O. Muraza, M. Yoshioka, A. M. Al-Amer, Z. H. Yamani, T. Yokoi, Ind. Eng. Chem. Res., 2014, 53, 19498-19505.
[96]	P. Cnudde, R. Demuynck, S. Vandenbrande, M. Waroquier, G. Sastre, V. V. Speybroeck, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2020, 142, 6007-6017.

MFI/MEL分子筛催化甲醇制烯烃反应关键参数的集成方法

An integrated approach to the key parameters in methanol-to-olefins reaction catalyzed by MFI/MEL zeolite materials

RichHTML

PDF

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

扫码分享

图/表 10

参考文献

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

[1]	邹心仪, 顾均. 酸性条件下二氧化碳高效电还原策略[J]. 催化学报, 2023, 52(9): 14-31.
[2]	韩璟怡, 管景奇. 通过表面镧改性和体相锰掺杂协助钴尖晶石酸性下析氧[J]. 催化学报, 2023, 51(8): 1-4.
[3]	刘润泽, 邵雪, 王畅, 戴卫理, 关乃佳. 甲醇制烃反应机理: 基础及应用研究[J]. 催化学报, 2023, 47(4): 67-92.
[4]	刘丹卿, 张丙兴, 赵国强, 陈建, 潘洪革, 孙文平. 原位电化学扫描探针显微镜技术在电催化领域的应用进展[J]. 催化学报, 2023, 47(4): 93-120.
[5]	Sue-Faye Ng, 陈星竹, Joel Jie Foo, 熊墨, Wee-Jun Ong. 2D氮化碳: 通过调节非金属硼掺杂C₃N₅阐明宽酸性及碱性pH范围的光催化析氢的反应机理[J]. 催化学报, 2023, 47(4): 150-160.
[6]	林杉帆, 郅玉春, 张文娜, 袁小帅, 张成伟, 叶茂, 徐舒涛, 魏迎旭, 刘中民. 氢转移反应对分子筛催化甲醇和二甲醚动态自催化反应历程的贡献: 深入理解甲醛的生成机理和作用机制[J]. 催化学报, 2023, 46(3): 11-27.
[7]	张丹, 石月, 陈希磊, 赖建平, 黄勃龙, 王磊. 高熵合金金属烯用于酸性条件下全水分解[J]. 催化学报, 2023, 45(2): 174-183.
[8]	Peerapol Pornsetmetakul, Ferdy J. A. G. Coumans, Rim C. J. van de Poll, Anna Liutkova, Duangkamon Suttipat, Brahim Mezari, Chularat Wattanakit, Emiel J. M. Hensen. BEA沸石后合成金属(Sn, Zr, Hf)改性: 结合Lewis和Brønsted酸性进行级联催化[J]. 催化学报, 2023, 55(12): 200-215.
[9]	张宁, 杜家毅, 周纳, 王德鹏, 鲍迪, 钟海霞, 张新波. 高价金属钽掺杂无定型氧化铱用于酸性氧析出反应[J]. 催化学报, 2023, 53(10): 134-142.
[10]	姚青, 乐家波, 杨是赜, 程俊, 邵琪, 黄小青. 痕量Pt显著提升RuO₂的酸性水分解性能[J]. 催化学报, 2022, 43(6): 1493-1501.
[11]	王梦茹, 王奕, 牟效玲, 林荣和, 丁云杰. 1,3-丁二烯选择性加氢催化剂的设计策略以及构效关系[J]. 催化学报, 2022, 43(4): 1017-1041.
[12]	李宏, 蒋昆, 邹受忠, 蔡文斌. CO₂电还原反应中的基础问题及原位振动光谱的对策[J]. 催化学报, 2022, 43(11): 2772-2791.
[13]	苏海胜, 常晓侠, 徐冰君. 表面增强振动光谱在电催化领域的运用: 基本原理、挑战和展望[J]. 催化学报, 2022, 43(11): 2757-2771.
[14]	黄睿, 温蕴周, 彭慧胜, 张波. 解耦质子-电子传输促进Ru-Pb二元电催化剂上的OER动力学[J]. 催化学报, 2022, 43(1): 130-138.
[15]	郭凯, 雷海涛, 李夏亮, 张宗尧, 王亚博, 郭鸿波, 张伟, 曹睿. 碱金属阳离子对铁卟啉电催化CO₂还原的影响[J]. 催化学报, 2021, 42(9): 1439-1444.