基于中能X射线的电催化基础研究: 用于电化学体系中液/固和气/固界面原位探测的实验室近常压光电子能谱

doi:10.1016/S1872-2067(22)64092-0

催化学报 ›› 2022, Vol. 43 ›› Issue (11): 2858-2870.DOI: 10.1016/S1872-2067(22)64092-0

基于中能X射线的电催化基础研究: 用于电化学体系中液/固和气/固界面原位探测的实验室近常压光电子能谱

刘迟妍^a^,^d^,^†, 董乔^a^,^d^,^†, 韩永^b^,^c^,^*(), 臧易静^a^,^d, 章辉^a, 谢晓明^a^,^d, 余毅^b^,^c^,^#(), 刘志^a^,^b^,^c^,^$()

^a中国科学院上海微系统与信息技术研究所, 信息功能材料国家重点实验室, 上海 200050
^b上海科技大学大科学中心, 上海 201210
^c上海科技大学物质科学与技术学院, 上海 201210
^d中国科学院大学, 北京 100049

收稿日期:2022-04-22 接受日期:2022-07-18 出版日期:2022-11-18 发布日期:2022-10-20
通讯作者: 韩永,余毅,刘志
作者简介:^† 共同第一作者.
基金资助:
国家自然科学基金(21832004);国家自然科学基金(21802096);国家自然科学基金(22072093);国家自然科学基金(21902179);国家自然科学基金(21991152);国家自然科学基金(21991150);国家自然科学基金(11227902);上海市青年科技启明星计划(21QA1406200);上海市科学技术委员会(14520722100);活细胞结构与功能成像等线站工程(31011505505885920161A2101001)

Understanding fundamentals of electrochemical reactions with tender X-rays: A new lab-based operando X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy method for probing liquid/solid and gas/solid interfaces across a variety of electrochemical systems

Chiyan Liu^a^,^d^,^†, Qiao Dong^a^,^d^,^†, Yong Han^b^,^c^,^*(), Yijing Zang^a^,^d, Hui Zhang^a, Xiaoming Xie^a^,^d, Yi Yu^b^,^c^,^#(), Zhi Liu^a^,^b^,^c^,^$()

^aState Key Laboratory of Functional Materials for Informatics, Shanghai Institute of Microsystem and Information Technology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Shanghai 200050, China
^bCenter for Transformative Science, ShanghaiTech University, Shanghai 201210, China
^cSchool of Physical Science and Technology, ShanghaiTech University, Shanghai 201210, China
^dUniversity of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, China

Received:2022-04-22 Accepted:2022-07-18 Online:2022-11-18 Published:2022-10-20
Contact: Yong Han, Yi Yu, Zhi Liu
About author:^† Contribute equally to this work.
Supported by:
National Natural Science Foundation of China(21832004);National Natural Science Foundation of China(21802096);National Natural Science Foundation of China(22072093);National Natural Science Foundation of China(21902179);National Natural Science Foundation of China(21991152);National Natural Science Foundation of China(21991150);National Natural Science Foundation of China(11227902);Shanghai Rising-Star Program(21QA1406200);Science and Technology Commission of Shanghai Municipality(14520722100);Shanghai-XFEL Beamline Project (SBP)(31011505505885920161A2101001)

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

在“双碳”目标背景下, 推进产业和能源结构调整, 发展可再生能源和提高能源利用效率成为当务之急. 电催化在提高能源效率、减少碳排放和实现全球能源体系的可持续发展中扮演重要角色. 阐明电解质/电极界面的反应机制是从原子分子层面理解电催化反应机理的前提, 对于理性合成高效催化剂以及开发先进可再生能源技术至关重要. 在界面反应机制的研究中, 一项关键要求是如何在工况条件下原位探测界面处的反应中间体、化学环境和电子结构的实时变化. 该要求对传统的X射线电子谱学实验方法提出了挑战.

由于传统的X射线电子能谱需要在超高真空的环境中开展实验, 导致该技术很难直接应用于电催化反应条件下的表征. 为了克服这一难题, 本文发展了用于电化学体系中液/固和气/固界面原位探测的实验室近常压光电子能谱. 该装置利用中能X射线(金属Cr的K_α发射谱线, 能量5.4 keV)作为激发光源, 配备HiPP-2电子能量分析器. 为满足电化学体系研究, 整套系统采用紧凑型设计, 通过分析测试腔体将X光源和电子能量分析器相连. 该近常压X光电子能谱仪的工作压力为30 Torr (室温下水的饱和蒸汽压为20 Torr), 可以直接将电化学溶液体系放入测试腔体. 分析测试腔体配备快门, 通过X射线窗口和分析器挡板, 可在不影响X光源和分析器真空的条件下快速更换研究体系. 通过原位样品杆的设计, 满足电化学三电极装置在测试腔体内的使用. 借助“浸-拉”方法在工作电极表面制备10纳米量级的连续液膜, 从而实现液/固界面的探测. 通过使用三电极装置, 该近常压光电子能谱系统可以表征电极表面物种、电解液以及电解液/电极界面随电位的变化. 此外, 还通过对钠氧模型电池的研究, 展示了该系统如何探测气/固界面在电化学反应中的变化. 本文还总结了当前在电化学研究中应用近常压光电子能谱的一些挑战和发展前沿, 期望通过仪器研发和电化学研究两个领域科学家的共同努力, 为现实反应条件下电化学界面的组成-反应性能关系的理解做出贡献.

关键词: 中能X射线, 近常压光电子能谱, 电催化, 液/固界面, 气/固界面

Abstract:

Electrocatalysis is key to improving energy efficiency, reducing carbon emissions, and providing a sustainable way of meeting global energy needs. Therefore, elucidating electrochemical reaction mechanisms at the electrolyte/electrode interfaces is essential for developing advanced renewable energy technologies. However, the direct probing of real-time interfacial changes, i.e., the surface intermediates, chemical environment, and electronic structure, under operating conditions is challenging and necessitates the use of in situ methods. Herein, we present a new lab-based instrument commissioned to perform in situ chemical analysis at liquid/solid interfaces using ambient pressure X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (APXPS). This setup takes advantage of a chromium source of tender X-rays and is designed to study liquid/solid interfaces by the “dip and pull” method. Each of the main components was carefully described, and the results of performance tests are presented. Using a three-electrode setup, the system can probe the intermediate species and potential shifts across the liquid electrolyte/solid electrode interface. In addition, we demonstrate how this system allows the study of interfacial changes at gas/solid interfaces using a case study: a sodium-oxygen model battery. However, the use of APXPS in electrochemical studies is still in the early stages, so we summarize the current challenges and some developmental frontiers. Despite the challenges, we expect that joint efforts to improve instruments and the electrochemical setup will enable us to obtain a better understanding of the composition-reactivity relationship at electrochemical interfaces under realistic reaction conditions.

Key words: Tender X-rays, Ambient pressure X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy, Electrocatalysis, Liquid/solid interface, Gas/solid interface

刘迟妍, 董乔, 韩永, 臧易静, 章辉, 谢晓明, 余毅, 刘志. 基于中能X射线的电催化基础研究: 用于电化学体系中液/固和气/固界面原位探测的实验室近常压光电子能谱[J]. 催化学报, 2022, 43(11): 2858-2870.

Chiyan Liu, Qiao Dong, Yong Han, Yijing Zang, Hui Zhang, Xiaoming Xie, Yi Yu, Zhi Liu. Understanding fundamentals of electrochemical reactions with tender X-rays: A new lab-based operando X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy method for probing liquid/solid and gas/solid interfaces across a variety of electrochemical systems[J]. Chinese Journal of Catalysis, 2022, 43(11): 2858-2870.

×
扫码分享

导出引用管理器 EndNote|Ris|BibTeX

链接本文: https://www.cjcatal.com/CN/10.1016/S1872-2067(22)64092-0

https://www.cjcatal.com/CN/Y2022/V43/I11/2858

图/表 7

Fig. 1. Schematic of a three-electrode “dip and pull” cell where a working electrode is in contact with a thin film of liquid electrolyte at equilibrium with water vapor for in situ APXPS measurement.

Fig. 2. Configuration of the laboratory-based APXPS instrument. (a) The system consists of three parts: a Cr-Kα X-ray source, analysis chamber, and HiPP-2 electron energy analyzer. (b) The X-ray beam is perpendicular to the optical axis of the electron analyzer, and the sample can be rotated to vary the incident angle of the X-ray source, which is separated from the analysis chamber by a Be window. (c) Photograph of the APXPS system. (d) Three-electrode setup in 1 mol L-1 KF electrolyte.

Fig. 3. Au 4f spectra obtained under PE = 100, 200 and 500 eV with slit sizes of 0.5, 1.5, and 4.0 mm. CPS is the abbreviation of counts per second.

Fig. 4. System performance with varying photoemission geometry. (a) Au 3d5/2 spectra taken at different angles between the sample surface and the light source. (b) Au 3d5/2 peak intensities and X-ray footprint widths as a function of the sample angle.

Fig. 5. (a) Au 3d5/2 spectra collected at different Ar pressures. (b) Au 3d5/2 peak intensity plotted as a function of Ar pressure.

Fig. 6. O 1s (a), Pt 4f (b), and Pt 3d5/2 (c) spectra of the WE in water vapor at 17 Torr using the operando “dip and pull” method and collected at ?0.065, 0.435, 0.635, 0.935 and 1.235 V vs. the standard hydrogen electrode (SHE). (d) Voltammogram of the dipped three-electrode setup (a Pt metal foil WE, Ag/AgCl RE, and Pt CE) in 1 mol L-1 KF electrolyte. (e) O 1s BE of liquid water vs. the WE potential.

Fig. 7. (a) Schematic of the structure (left) and photograph (right) of the Na-O2 battery during measurements in the analysis chamber. P is the potentiostat. (b) Discharge-charge curve of the solid-state Na-O2 cell in the APXPS analysis chamber (at 4 Torr O2 + 11 Torr water vapor atmosphere at room temperature). (c) Na 1s and O 1s spectra of the cathode of the Na-O2 battery during discharge and charge processes.

参考文献

[1]	M. Armand, J. M. Tarascon, Nature, 2008, 451, 652-657.
[2]	M. P. Mercer, H. E. Hoster, Nano Energy, 2016, 29, 394-413.
[3]	A. Knop-Gericke, V. Pfeifer, J.-J. Velasco-Velez, T. Jones, R. Arrigo, M. Hävecker, R. Schlögl, J. Electron Spectrosc. Relat. Phenom., 2017, 221, 10-17.
[4]	V. Pfeifer, T. E. Jones, J. J. Velasco Vélez, R. Arrigo, S. Piccinin, M. Hävecker, A. Knop-Gericke, R. Schlögl, Chem. Sci., 2017, 8, 2143-2149.
[5]	L. J. Frevel, R. Mom, J.-J. Velasco-Vélez, M. Plodinec, A. Knop-Gericke, R. Schlögl, T. E. Jones, J. Phys. Chem. C, 2019, 123, 9146-9152.
[6]	H. Siegbahn, J. Phys. Chem., 1985, 89, 897-909.
[7]	M. Salmeron, R. Schlögl, Surf. Sci. Rep., 2008, 63, 169-199.
[8]	C. Arble, M. Jia, J. T. Newberg, Surf. Sci. Rep., 2018, 73, 37-57.
[9]	D. E. Starr, Z. Liu, M. Havecker, A. Knop-Gericke, H. Bluhm, Chem. Soc. Rev., 2013, 42, 5833-5857.
[10]	Y. Han, H. Zhang, Y. Yu, Z. Liu, ACS Catal., 2021, 11, 1464-1484.
[11]	H. Siegbahn, M. Lundholm, J. Electron Spectrosc. Relat. Phenom., 1982, 28, 135-138.
[12]	I. Doron-Mor, A. Hatzor, A. Vaskevich, T. van der Boom-Moav, A. Shanzer, I. Rubinstein, H. Cohen, Nature, 2000, 406, 382-385.
[13]	G. Ertas, S. Suzer, in: Surface Chemistry in Biomedical and Environmental Science, J. P. Blitz, V. M. Gun'ko, ed., Springer Netherlands, Dordrecht, 2006, 45-58.
[14]	C. Zhang, M. E. Grass, A. H. McDaniel, S. C. DeCaluwe, F. E. Gabaly, Z. Liu, K. F. McCarty, R. L. Farrow, M. A. Linne, Z. Hussain, G. S. Jackson, H. Bluhm, B. W. Eichhorn, Nat. Mater., 2010, 9, 944-949.
[15]	J. Schnadt, J. Knudsen, N. Johansson, J. Phys.-Condens. Matter, 2020, 32, 413003.
[16]	J. J. Velasco-Velez, V. Pfeifer, M. Hävecker, R. S. Weatherup, R. Arrigo, C.-H. Chuang, E. Stotz, G. Weinberg, M. Salmeron, R. Schlögl, A. Knop-Gericke, Angew. Chem. Int. Ed., 2015, 54, 14554-14558.
[17]	R. Mom, L. Frevel, J.-J. Velasco-Vélez, M. Plodinec, A. Knop-Gericke, R. Schlögl, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2019, 141, 6537-6544.
[18]	L. J. Falling, R. V. Mom, L. E. Sandoval Diaz, S. Nakhaie, E. Stotz, D. Ivanov, M. Hävecker, T. Lunkenbein, A. Knop-Gericke, R. Schlögl, J.-J. Velasco-Vélez, ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces, 2020, 12, 37680-37692.
[19]	S. Axnanda, E. J. Crumlin, B. Mao, S. Rani, R. Chang, P. G. Karlsson, M. O. M. Edwards, M. Lundqvist, R. Moberg, P. Ross, Z. Hussain, Z. Liu, Sci. Rep., 2015, 5, 9788.
[20]	T. Masuda, H. Yoshikawa, H. Noguchi, T. Kawasaki, M. Kobata, K. Kobayashi, K. Uosaki, Appl. Phys. Lett., 2013, 103, 111605.
[21]	Y. Takagi, H. Wang, Y. Uemura, E. Ikenaga, O. Sekizawa, T. Uruga, H. Ohashi, Y. Senba, H. Yumoto, H. Yamazaki, S. Goto, M. Tada, Y. Iwasawa, T. Yokoyama, Appl. Phys. Lett., 2014, 105, 131602.
[22]	Y. T. Law, S. Zafeiratos, S. G. Neophytides, A. Orfanidi, D. Costa, T. Dintzer, R. Arrigo, A. Knop-Gericke, R. Schlögl, E. R. Savinova, Chem. Sci., 2015, 6, 5635-5642.
[23]	M. Favaro, B. Jeong, P. N. Ross, J. Yano, Z. Hussain, Z. Liu, E. J. Crumlin, Nat. Commun., 2016, 7, 12695.
[24]	F. J. Dyson, Imagined Worlds, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, 1997.
[25]	R. Schlögl, Angew. Chem. Int. Ed., 2015, 54, 3465-3520.
[26]	K. F. Kalz, R. Kraehnert, M. Dvoyashkin, R. Dittmeyer, R. Gläser, U. Krewer, K. Reuter, J.-D. Grunwaldt, ChemCatChem, 2017, 9, 17-29.
[27]	J.-J. Velasco-Velez, L. J. Falling, D. Bernsmeier, M. J. Sear, P. C. J. Clark, T.-S. Chan, E. Stotz, M. Hävecker, R. Kraehnert, A. Knop-Gericke, C.-H. Chuang, D. E. Starr, M. Favaro, R. V. Mom, J. Phys. D-Appl. Phys., 2021, 54, 124003.
[28]	C. A. Campos-Roldán, R. G. González-Huerta, N. Alonso-Vante, J. Electrochem. Soc., 2018, 165, J3001-J3007.
[29]	A. J. Bard, L. R. Faulkner, Electrochemical Methods: Fundamentals and Applications, 2nd ed., John Wiley & Sons, New York, 2003.
[30]	M. Kobata, I. Pis, H. Nohira, H. Iwai, K. Kobayashi, Surf. Interface Anal., 2011, 43, 1632-1635.
[31]	K. Kobayashi, M. Kobata, H. Iwai, J. Electron Spectrosc. Relat. Phenom., 2013, 190, 210-221.
[32]	D. F. Ogletree, H. Bluhm, G. Lebedev, C. S. Fadley, Z. Hussain, M. Salmeron, Rev. Sci. Instrum., 2002, 73, 3872-3877.
[33]	J. A. Whaley, A. H. McDaniel, F. El Gabaly, R. L. Farrow, M. E. Grass, Z. Hussain, Z. Liu, M. A. Linne, H. Bluhm, K. F. McCarty, Rev. Sci. Instrum., 2010, 81, 086104.
[34]	M. O. M. Edwards, P. G. Karlsson, S. K. Eriksson, M. Hahlin, H. Siegbahn, H. Rensmo, J. M. Kahk, I. J. Villar-Garcia, D. J. Payne, J. Åhlund, Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res., Sect. A, 2015, 785, 191-196.
[35]	Z. Novotny, D. Aegerter, N. Comini, B. Tobler, L. Artiglia, U. Maier, T. Moehl, E. Fabbri, T. Huthwelker, T. J. Schmidt, M. Ammann, J. A. van Bokhoven, J. Raabe, J. Osterwalder, Rev. Sci. Instrum., 2020, 91, 023103.
[36]	J. J. Olivero, R. L. Longbothum, J. Quant. Spectrosc. Radiat. Transfer, 1977, 17, 233-236.
[37]	J. L. Campbell, T. Papp, At. Data Nucl. Data Tables, 2001, 77, 1-56.
[38]	S. Mähl, M. Neumann, S. Dieckhoff, V. Schlett, A. Baalmann, J. Electron Spectrosc. Relat. Phenom., 1997, 85, 197-203.
[39]	A. Regoutz, M. Mascheck, T. Wiell, S. K. Eriksson, C. Liljenberg, K. Tetzner, B. A. D. Williamson, D. O. Scanlon, P. Palmgren, Rev. Sci. Instrum., 2018, 89, 073105.
[40]	Y. Takata, M. Yabashi, K. Tamasaku, Y. Nishino, D. Miwa, T. Ishikawa, E. Ikenaga, K. Horiba, S. Shin, M. Arita, K. Shimada, H. Namatame, M. Taniguchi, H. Nohira, T. Hattori, S. Södergren, B. Wannberg, K. Kobayashi, Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res., Sect. A, 2005, 547, 50-55.
[41]	V. N. Strocov, J. Synchrotron Radiat., 2013, 20, 517-521.
[42]	M. E. Grass, P. G. Karlsson, F. Aksoy, M. Lundqvist, B. Wannberg, B. S. Mun, Z,. Hussain,; Z. Liu, Rev. Sci. Instrum., 2010, 81, 053106.
[43]	J. Cai, Q. Dong, Y. Han, B.-H. Mao, H. Zhang, P. G. Karlsson, J. Åhlund, R.-Z. Tai, Y. Yu, Z. Liu, Nucl. Sci. Tech., 2019, 30, 81.
[44]	R. Rizo, E. Sitta, E. Herrero, V. Climent, J. M. Feliu, Electrochim. Acta, 2015, 162, 138-145.
[45]	M. Favaro, C. Valero-Vidal, J. Eichhorn, F. M. Toma, P. N. Ross, J. Yano, Z. Liu, E. J. Crumlin, J. Mater. Chem. A, 2017, 5, 11634-11643.
[46]	C. Jiang, B. Mao, F. Diao, Q. Li, Z. Wen, P. Si, H. Zhang, Z. Liu, J. Phys. D-Appl. Phys., 2021, 54, 174005.
[47]	A. Barrie, F. J. Street, J. Electron Spectrosc. Relat. Phenom., 1975, 7, 1-31.
[48]	N. Zhao, C. Li, X. Guo, Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys., 2014, 16, 15646-15652.
[49]	B. Mao, Y. Dai, J. Cai, Q. Li, C. Jiang, Y. Li, J. Xie, Z. Liu, Top. Catal., 2018, 61, 2123-2128.
[50]	J. G. Vos, A. Venugopal, W. A. Smith, M. T. M. Koper, J. Electrochem. Soc., 2020, 167, 046505.
[51]	K. A. Stoerzinger, M. Favaro, P. N. Ross, Z. Hussain, Z. Liu, J. Yano, E. J. Crumlin, Top. Catal., 2018, 61, 2152-2160.
[52]	C. Wang, C. Meng, S. Li, G. Zhang, Y. Ning, Q. Fu, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2021, 143, 17843-17850.
[53]	C. Wang, Y. Ning, H. Huang, S. Li, C. Xiao, Q. Chen, L. Peng, S. Guo, Y. Li, C. Liu, Z.-S. Wu, X. Li, L. Chen, C. Gao, C. Wu, Q. Fu, Natl. Sci. Rev., 2021, 8, nwaa289.
[54]	Z. Nagy, H. You, J. Electroanal. Chem., 1995, 381, 275-279.

基于中能X射线的电催化基础研究: 用于电化学体系中液/固和气/固界面原位探测的实验室近常压光电子能谱

Understanding fundamentals of electrochemical reactions with tender X-rays: A new lab-based operando X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy method for probing liquid/solid and gas/solid interfaces across a variety of electrochemical systems

RichHTML

PDF

Supporting Information

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

扫码分享

图/表 7

参考文献

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

[1]	唐小龙, 李锋, 李方, 江燕斌, 余长林. 单原子催化剂在光催化和电催化合成过氧化氢中的研究进展[J]. 催化学报, 2023, 52(9): 79-98.
[2]	张季, 俞爱民, 孙成华. 非金属掺杂石墨烯异核双原子催化剂氮还原特性研究[J]. 催化学报, 2023, 52(9): 263-270.
[3]	胡金念, 田玲婵, 王海燕, 孟洋, 梁锦霞, 朱纯, 李隽. MXene负载3d金属单原子高效氮还原电催化剂的理论筛选[J]. 催化学报, 2023, 52(9): 252-262.
[4]	洪岩, 王琦, 阚子旺, 张禹烁, 郭晶, 李思琦, 刘松, 李斌. 电化学氮还原氨反应催化剂的最新研究进展[J]. 催化学报, 2023, 52(9): 50-78.
[5]	刘勇, 赵晓丽, 隆昶, 王晓艳, 邓邦为, 李康璐, 孙艳娟, 董帆. 原位构筑动态Cu/Ce(OH)_x界面用于高活性、高选择性和高稳定性硝酸盐还原合成氨[J]. 催化学报, 2023, 52(9): 196-206.
[6]	高晖, 张恭, 程东方, 王永涛, 赵静, 李晓芝, 杜晓伟, 赵志坚, 王拓, 张鹏, 巩金龙. 构建Cu台阶位促进电催化CO₂还原制醇类化学品的研究[J]. 催化学报, 2023, 52(9): 187-195.
[7]	邹心仪, 顾均. 酸性条件下二氧化碳高效电还原策略[J]. 催化学报, 2023, 52(9): 14-31.
[8]	周波, 石建巧, 姜一民, 肖磊, 逯宇轩, 董帆, 陈晨, 王特华, 王双印, 邹雨芹. 强化脱氢动力学实现超低电池电压和大电流密度下抗坏血酸电氧化[J]. 催化学报, 2023, 50(7): 372-380.
[9]	王元男, 王立娜, 张可新, 徐靖尧, 武倩楠, 谢周兵, 安伟, 梁宵, 邹晓新. 钙钛矿氧化物在水裂解反应中的电催化研究[J]. 催化学报, 2023, 50(7): 109-125.
[10]	周纳, 王家志, 张宁, 王志, 王恒国, 黄岗, 鲍迪, 钟海霞, 张新波. 富含缺陷的Cu@CuTCNQ复合材料增强电催化硝酸盐还原成氨[J]. 催化学报, 2023, 50(7): 324-333.
[11]	李轩, 蒋兴星, 孔艳, 孙建桔, 胡琪, 柴晓燕, 杨恒攀, 何传新. GaN/In₂O₃的界面工程用于高效电催化CO₂还原制备甲酸[J]. 催化学报, 2023, 50(7): 314-323.
[12]	Sang Eon Jun, Sungkyun Choi, Jaehyun Kim, Ki Chang Kwon, Sun Hwa Park, Ho Won Jang. 用于电化学能量转换反应的非贵金属单原子催化剂[J]. 催化学报, 2023, 50(7): 195-214.
[13]	牛青, 米林华, 陈玮, 李秋军, 钟升红, 于岩, 李留义. 基于共价有机框架的单位点光(电)催化材料的研究进展[J]. 催化学报, 2023, 50(7): 45-82.
[14]	欧阳玲, 梁杰, 罗永嵩, 郑冬冬, 孙圣钧, 刘倩, Mohamed S. Hamdy, 孙旭平, 应斌武. 电催化合成氨的研究进展[J]. 催化学报, 2023, 50(7): 6-44.
[15]	李静静, 张锋伟, 詹新雨, 郭河芳, 张涵, 昝文艳, 孙振宇, 张献明. 酞菁镍分子结构的精确设计: 优化电子和空间效应用于CO₂电还原[J]. 催化学报, 2023, 48(5): 117-126.