Effect of electron acceptors H2O2 and O2 on the generated reactive oxygen species 1O2 and OH· in TiO2-catalyzed photocatalytic oxidation of glycerol

doi:10.1016/S1872-2067(16)62519-6

Abstract

Abstract:

The effect of the electron acceptors H₂O₂ and O₂ on the type of generated reactive oxygen species (ROS), and glycerol conversion and product distribution in the TiO₂-catalyzed photocatalytic oxida-tion of glycerol was studied at ambient conditions. In the absence of an electron acceptor, only HO^· radicals were generated by irradiated UV light and TiO₂. However, in the presence of the two elec-tron acceptors, both HO^· radical and ¹O₂ were produced by irradiated UV light and TiO₂ in different concentrations that depended on the concentration of the electron acceptor. The use of H₂O₂ as an electron acceptor enhanced glycerol conversion more than O₂. The type of generated value-added compounds depended on the concentration of the generated ROS.

Key words: Glycerol oxidation, Titanium dioxide, Photocatalyst, Electron acceptor

Trin Jedsukontorn, Vissanu Meeyoo, Nagahiro Saito, Mali Hunsom. Effect of electron acceptors H₂O₂ and O₂ on the generated reactive oxygen species ¹O₂ and OH^· in TiO₂-catalyzed photocatalytic oxidation of glycerol[J]. Chinese Journal of Catalysis, 2016, 37(11): 1975-1981.

×
share this article

Add to citation manager EndNote|Ris|BibTeX

URL: https://www.cjcatal.com/EN/10.1016/S1872-2067(16)62519-6

https://www.cjcatal.com/EN/Y2016/V37/I11/1975

References

[1] H. Ueoka, T. Katayama, US Patent 6288287, 2001.
[2] J. Ftouni, N. Villandier, F. Auneau, M. Besson, L. Djakovitch, C. Pi-nel, Catal. Today, 2015, 257, 267-273.
[3] G. Y. Yang, Y. H. Ke, H. F. Ren, C. L. Liu, R. Z. Yang, W. S. Dong, Chem. Eng. J., 2016, 283, 759-767.
[4] H. X. Yin, C. H. Zhang, H. B. Yin, D. Z. Gao, L. Q. Shen, A. L. Wang, Chem. Eng. J., 2016, 288, 332-343.
[5] S. Thanasilp, J. W. Schwank, V. Meeyoo, S. Pengpanich, M. Hunsom, Chem. Eng. J., 2015, 275, 113-124.
[6] S. Thanasilp, J. W. Schwank, V. Meeyoo, S. Pengpanich, M. Hunsom, J. Mol. Catal. A, 2013, 380, 49-56.
[7] K. Omata, K. Matsumoto, T. Murayama, W. Ueda, Catal. Today, 2016, 259, 205-212.
[8] R. Ciriminna, G. Palmisano, C. D. Pina, M. Rossi, M. Pagliaro, Tetra-hedron Lett., 2006, 47, 6993-6995.
[9] J. Luo, H. G. Li, N. Zhao, F. Wang, F. K. Xiao, J. Fuel Chem. Technol., 2015, 43, 677-683.
[10] P. K. Dikshit, V. S. Moholkar, Bioresour. Technol., 2016, 216, 1058-1065.
[11] X. M. Ning, Y. H. Li, H. Yu, F. Peng, H. J. Wang, Y. H. Yang, J. Catal., 2016, 335, 95-104.
[12] R. Estevez, S. Lopez-Pedrajas, F. Blanco-Bonilla, D. Luna, F. M. Bautista, Chem. Eng. J., 2015, 282, 179-186.
[13] C. García-Sancho, J. A. Cecilia, A. Moreno-Ruiz, J. M. Mérida-Robles,J. Santamaría-González, R. Moreno-Tost, P. Maireles-Torres, Appl. Catal. B, 2015, 179, 139-149.
[14] A. Talebian-Kiakalaieh, N. A. S. Amin, Z. Y. Zakaria, J. Ind. Eng. Chem., 2016, 34, 300-312.
[15] M. Hunsom, P. Saila, Renew. Energy, 2015, 74, 227-236.
[16] C. R. Zanata, P. S. Fernández, H. E. Troiani, A. L. Soldati, R. Landers, G. A. Camara, A. E. Carvalho, C. A. Martins, Appl. Catal. B, 2016, 181, 445-455.
[17] A. L. Linsebigler, G. Q. Lu, J. T. Yates, J. Chem. Res., 1995, 95, 735-758.
[18] V. Augugliaro, H. A. Hamed El Nazer, V. Loddo, A. Mele, G. Palmisano, L. Palmisano, S. Yurdakal, Catal. Today, 2010, 151, 21-28.
[19] C. Minero, A. Bedini, V. Maurino, Appl. Catal. B, 2012, 128, 135-143.
[20] R. F. Chong, J. Li, X. Zhou, Y. Ma, J. X. Yang, L. Huang, H. X. Han, F. X. Zhang, C. Li, Chem. Commun., 2014, 50, 165-167.
[21] C. H. Wu, Chemosphere, 2014, 57, 601-608.
[22] V. M. Daskalaki, P. Panagiotopoulou, D. I. Kondarides, Chem. Eng. J., 2011, 170, 433-439.
[23] Slamet, D. Tristantini, Valentina, M. Ibadurrohman, Int. J. Energy Res., 2013, 37, 1372-1381.
[24] P. Panagiotopoulou, E. E. Karamerou, D. I. Kondarides, Catal. To-day, 2013, 209, 91-98.
[25] T. Hirakawa, K. Yawata, Y. Nosaka, Appl. Catal. A, 2007, 325, 105-111.
[26] X. Y. Guo, Q. L. Li, M. Zhang, M. C. Long, L. C. Kong, Q. X. Zhou, H. Q. Shao, W. L. Hu, T. T. Wei, Chemosphere, 2015, 120, 521-526.
[27] A. Maldotti, A. Molinari, R. Amadelli, Chem. Rev., 2002, 102, 3811-3836.
[28] D. R. Kearns, Chem. Rev., 1971, 71, 395-427.
[29] T. Daimon, T. Hirakawa, M. Kitazawa, J. Suetake, Y. Nosaka, Appl. Catal. A, 2008, 340, 169-175.
[30] T. Jedsukontorn, V. Meeyoo, N. Saito, M. Hunsom, Chem. Eng. J., 2015, 281, 252-264.
[31] W. Y. Han, P. Y. Zhang, W. P. Zhu, J. J. Yin, L. S. Li, Water Res., 2004, 38, 4197-4203.
[32] W. R. Haag, J. Hoigne, Environ. Sci. Technol., 1986, 20, 341-348.
[33] A. Yamakata, T. A. Ishibashi, H. Onishi, J. Phys. Chem. B, 2003, 107, 9820-9823.
[34] R. M. Gao, J. Stark, D. W. Bahnemann, J. Rabani, J. Photochem. Pho-tobiol. A, 2002, 148, 387-391.
[35] M. Stylidi, D. I. Kondarides, X. E. Verykios, Appl. Catal. B, 2004, 47, 189-201.
[36] D. H. Tseng, L. C. Juang, H. H. Huang. Int. J. Photoenergy, 2012, 2012, 1-9.
[37] G. N. Nomikos, P. Panagiotopoulou, D. I. Kondarides, X. E. Verykios, Appl. Catal. B, 2014, 146, 249-257.
[38] G. F. IJpelaar, D. J. H. Harmsen, M. Heringa, Techneau, D2.4.1.1, May 2007.
[39] E. F. Beerendonk, New Concepts of UV/H₂O₂ Oxidation, Project number B111.604BTO 2011.046, 2011.
[40] S. Parra, V. Sarria, S. Malato, P. Peringer, C. Pulgarin, Appl. Catal. B, 2000, 27, 153-168.
[41] M. R. Hoffmann, S. T. Martin, W. Choi, D. W. Bahnemann, Chem. Rev., 1995, 95, 69-96.
[42] A. Fujishima, X. T. Zhang, D. A. Tryk, Surf. Sci. Rep., 2008, 63, 515-582
[43] S. Demirel-Gülen, M. Lucas, P. Claus, Catal. Today, 2005, 102-103, 166-172.
[44] S. Carrettin, P. McMorn, P. Johnston, K. Griffin, C. J. Kielly, G. J. Hutchings, Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys., 2003, 5, 1329-1336.
[45] S. Gil, M. Marchena, L. Sánchez-Silva, A. Romero, P. Sánchez, J. L. Valverde, Chem. Eng. J., 2011, 178, 423-435.
[46] J. Deleplanque, J. L. Dubois, J. F. Devaux, W. Ueda, Catal. Today, 2010, 157, 351-358.

Effect of electron acceptors H₂O₂ and O₂ on the generated reactive oxygen species ¹O₂ and OH^· in TiO₂-catalyzed photocatalytic oxidation of glycerol

PDF (PC)

Knowledge

Abstract

Cite this article

share this article

share this article

References

Related Articles 15

Recommended Articles

Metrics

[1]	Mingjie Cai, Yanping Liu, Kexin Dong, Xiaobo Chen, Shijie Li. Floatable S-scheme Bi₂WO₆/C₃N₄/carbon fiber cloth composite photocatalyst for efficient water decontamination [J]. Chinese Journal of Catalysis, 2023, 52(9): 239-251.
[2]	Xin Yuan, Hai-Bin Fan, Jie Liu, Long-Zhou Qin, Jian Wang, Xiu Duan, Jiang-Kai Qiu, Kai Guo. Recent advances in photoredox catalytic transformations by using continuous-flow technology [J]. Chinese Journal of Catalysis, 2023, 50(7): 175-194.
[3]	Mengistu Tulu Gonfa, Sheng Shen, Lang Chen, Biao Hu, Wei Zhou, Zhang-Jun Bai, Chak-Tong Au, Shuang-Feng Yin. Research progress on the heterogeneous photocatalytic selective oxidation of benzene to phenol [J]. Chinese Journal of Catalysis, 2023, 49(6): 16-41.
[4]	Ning Li, Xueyun Gao, Junhui Su, Yangqin Gao, Lei Ge. Metallic WO₂-decorated g-C₃N₄ nanosheets as noble-metal-free photocatalysts for efficient photocatalysis [J]. Chinese Journal of Catalysis, 2023, 47(4): 161-170.
[5]	Fan-Lin Zeng, Hu-Lin Zhu, Ru-Nan Wang, Xiao-Ya Yuan, Kai Sun, Ling-Bo Qu, Xiao-Lan Chen, Bing Yu. Bismuth vanadate: A versatile heterogeneous catalyst for photocatalytic functionalization of C(sp²)-H bonds [J]. Chinese Journal of Catalysis, 2023, 46(3): 157-166.
[6]	Yang Sun, Jan E. Szulejko, Ki-Hyun Kim, Vanish Kumar, Xiaowei Li. Recent advances in the development of bismuth-based materials for the photocatalytic reduction of hexavalent chromium in water [J]. Chinese Journal of Catalysis, 2023, 55(12): 20-43.
[7]	Weikang Wang, Shaobin Mei, Haopeng Jiang, Lele Wang, Hua Tang, Qinqin Liu. Recent advances in TiO₂-based S-scheme heterojunction photocatalysts [J]. Chinese Journal of Catalysis, 2023, 55(12): 137-158.
[8]	Ningning Wang, Shuo Wang, Can Li, Chenyang Li, Chunjiang Liu, Shanshan Chen, Fuxiang Zhang. ZrO₂ modification of homogeneous nitrogen-doped oxide MgTa₂O_6-_xN_x for promoted photocatalytic water splitting [J]. Chinese Journal of Catalysis, 2023, 54(11): 220-228.
[9]	Weixu Liu, Chang He, Bowen Zhu, Enwei Zhu, Yaning Zhang, Yunning Chen, Junshan Li, Yongfa Zhu. Progress in wastewater treatment via organic supramolecular photocatalysts under sunlight irradiation [J]. Chinese Journal of Catalysis, 2023, 53(10): 13-30.
[10]	Kai Shi, Di Si, Xue Teng, Lisong Chen, Jianlin Shi. Enhanced electrocatalytic glycerol oxidation on CuCoN_0.6/CP at significantly reduced potentials [J]. Chinese Journal of Catalysis, 2023, 53(10): 143-152.
[11]	Yiming Lei, Jinhua Ye, Jordi García-Antón, Huimin Liu. Recent advances in the built-in electric-field-assisted photocatalytic dry reforming of methane [J]. Chinese Journal of Catalysis, 2023, 53(10): 72-101.
[12]	Hui Yang, Kai Dai, Jinfeng Zhang, Graham Dawson. Inorganic-organic hybrid photocatalysts: Syntheses, mechanisms, and applications [J]. Chinese Journal of Catalysis, 2022, 43(8): 2111-2140.
[13]	Yu-Lan Wu, Ming-Yu Qi, Chang-Long Tan, Zi-Rong Tang, Yi-Jun Xu. Photocatalytic selective oxidation of aromatic alcohols coupled with hydrogen evolution over CdS/WO₃ composites [J]. Chinese Journal of Catalysis, 2022, 43(7): 1851-1859.
[14]	Fangshuai Chen, Chongbei Wu, Gengfeng Zheng, Liangti Qu, Qing Han. Few-layer carbon nitride photocatalysts for solar fuels and chemicals: Current status and prospects [J]. Chinese Journal of Catalysis, 2022, 43(5): 1216-1229.
[15]	Aixia Wang, Linhe Zhang, Xuli Li, Yangqin Gao, Ning Li, Guiwu Lu, Lei Ge. Synthesis of ternary Ni₂P@UiO-66-NH₂/Zn_0.5Cd_0.5S composite materials with significantly improved photocatalytic H₂ production performance [J]. Chinese Journal of Catalysis, 2022, 43(5): 1295-1305.