O桥联NiSe2/CQDs复合材料: 协同调控界面电子转移实现H2O2高效电合成

doi:10.1016/S1872-2067(26)65029-2

催化学报 ›› 2026, Vol. 85: 258-271.DOI: 10.1016/S1872-2067(26)65029-2

O桥联NiSe₂/CQDs复合材料: 协同调控界面电子转移实现H₂O₂高效电合成

徐芊牵^a, 钟海红^b(), 李纯莉^a, 姜蓉^a(), 冯拥军^a^,^d(), Luis Alberto Estudillo-Wong^c

^a 北京化工大学化学学院, 化工资源有效利用国家重点实验室, 北京 100029, 中国
^b 海南大学化学化工学院, 生态文明协同创新中心, 海南海口 570228, 中国
^c 墨西哥国立理工学院, 材料科学研究所与先进技术中心, 生物科学与工程系, 墨西哥城, 墨西哥
^d 衢州资源化工创新研究院, 浙江衢州 324000, 中国

收稿日期:2025-11-05 接受日期:2025-12-31 出版日期:2026-06-18 发布日期:2026-05-18
通讯作者: *电子信箱: hzhong@hainanu.edu.cn (钟海红),
hazeljr@buct.edu.cn (姜蓉),
yjfeng@mail.buct.edu.cn (冯拥军).
基金资助:
国家自然科学基金(22494683);国家自然科学基金(22368020);外国专家项目(H20240305);海南大学人才研究基金(KYQD(ZR)23055)

O-bridged NiSe₂/CQDs composite synergistically triggers interfacial electrons transfer to promote H₂O₂ electrosynthesis

Qianqian Xu^a, Haihong Zhong^b(), Chunli Li^a, Rong Jiang^a(), Yongjun Feng^a^,^d(), Luis Alberto Estudillo-Wong^c

^a State Key Laboratory of Chemical Resource Engineering, College of Chemistry, Beijing University of Chemical Technology, Beijing 100029, China
^b School of Chemistry and Chemical Engineering, Collaborative Innovation Center of Ecological Civilization, Hainan University, Haikou 570228, Hainan, China
^c Departamento de Biociencias e Ingeniería, CIIEMAD-IPN, Instituto Politécnico Nacional, Ciudad de México C.P. 07340, Mexico
^d Quzhou Institute for Innovation in Resource Chemical Engineering, Quzhou, Zhejiang Province 324000, China

Received:2025-11-05 Accepted:2025-12-31 Online:2026-06-18 Published:2026-05-18
Contact: *E-mail: hzhong@hainanu.edu.cn (H. Zhong),
hazeljr@buct.edu.cn (R. Jiang),
About author:CRediT authorship contribution statement
Qianqian XU: Investigation, Methodology, Writing-original draft; Haihong ZHONG: Supervision, Conceptualization, Writing-review & editing; Chunli LI: Data analysis; Rong JIANG: Investigation; Writing-review & editing; Luis Alberto Estudillo-Wong: Data analysis; Yongjun FENG: Supervision, Resources, Writing-review & editing, Funding acquisition.
Supported by:
National Natural Science Foundation of China(22494683);National Natural Science Foundation of China(22368020);Foreign expert project(H20240305);Research Foundation for Talented Scholars of Hainan University(KYQD(ZR)23055)

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

过氧化氢(H₂O₂)作为环境友好型氧化剂与消毒剂, 在化工、医疗领域需求持续增长, 2027年全球需求量预计达570万吨. 当前其工业生产高度依赖高能耗、高安全隐患的蒽醌法, 而基于二电子氧还原反应(2e^- ORR)的电化学合成技术, 因绿色安全、操作灵活的优势, 成为由O₂和H₂O现场制备H₂O₂的理想替代方案. 然而, 该技术受竞争性四电子氧还原反应(4e^- ORR)路径干扰, H₂O₂的选择性与法拉第效率受限. 因此, 开发高活性、高2e^-选择性电催化剂具有重要现实意义. 近年来, 2e^- ORR电催化剂研究集中于贵金属合金、过渡金属化合物等材料, 其中过渡金属硒化物因成本效益高、环境兼容且电子结构可调, 成为研究热点, 但其H₂O₂产率和长期稳定性仍存在提升空间.

本工作针对2e^- ORR电催化合成H₂O₂的性能提升需求, 设计并制备了一种新型高效复合非贵金属电催化剂: 利用氧掺杂碳量子点(O-CQDs)高比表面积、丰富表面官能团的特性, 对硒化镍(NiSe₂)进行表面修饰, 通过优化金属活性中心电子结构, 显著提升NiSe₂的2e^- ORR催化性能. 首先, 以十六烷基三甲基氯化铵(CTAC)为形貌控制剂, 采用简单的共沉淀法制备超薄镍纳米片前驱体; 对所制备的镍纳米片前驱体进行硒化处理获得二NiSe₂纳米颗粒/纳米片; 同时, 以葡萄糖为碳源, 通过水热法单独合成O-CQDs. 随后, 将预合成的NiSe₂与O-CQDs通过水热处理进行复合, 最终得到NiSe₂/O-CQDs复合催化剂. 相较于部分已报道电催化剂高达900 °C甚至1000 °C的热解温度, 本文采用的合成温度明显更低, 提供了一条能耗较低的合成路径. 拉曼光谱、X射线光电子能谱及X射线吸收光谱等系列光谱表征证实, 复合催化剂中形成了O-桥联界面. 密度泛函数理论计算进一步揭示, 表面Ni位点是主要催化中心, O-CQDs与NiSe₂间的强电子耦合作用促使界面形成内建电场, 诱导电子向Ni活性位点转移, 优化了O₂分子在富电子Ni位点的“端位”吸附构型的同时, 降低了^•OOH中间体的生成能垒, 从而高效驱动2e^- ORR高选择性生成H₂O₂. 该催化剂不仅在旋转环盘电极测试中表现优异, 在连续流电解池体系中也展现出突出的H₂O₂电合成性能: 31.25 mA cm^-2电流密度下, H₂O₂产率高达7458.24 mmol g_cat^-1 h^-1, 优于大部分已报道的电催化剂; 0.5 V (vs. RHE)电位下, 法拉第效率达92.88%, 且长期稳定性可维持100 h. 在电芬顿体系中, 将该催化剂电解1 h所得的电解液与Fe²⁺混合后, 可在10 min内完全降解罗丹明B、20 min内完全降解亚甲基蓝.

综上, 通过O-桥联界面调控复合催化剂的界面电荷分布, 是提升2e^- ORR催化性能的有效策略; 同时, NiSe₂/O-CQDs复合催化剂在含染料废水处理领域也展现出一定的应用潜力. 该工作为电子结构调控工程优化催化剂设计提供了理论参考, 有助于深化催化剂结构-性能关系的研究, 也为H₂O₂即产即用领域的发展提供了有益借鉴.

关键词: 二电子氧还原反应, 硒化镍, 氧掺杂碳量子点, 过氧化氢生产, 电子结构

Abstract:

Modulating the electronic structure of electrocatalysts represents a widely employed strategy to enhance the oxygen reduction reaction (ORR) activity and H₂O₂ selectivity, yet achieving precise control over this process remains challenging. In this work, we introduce oxygen-doped carbon quantum dots (O-CQDs) into NiSe₂ nanoparticles/nanosheets to regulate the electronic structure of Ni active sites. This optimization promotes favorable O₂ adsorption and reduces the energy barrier for ^•OOH formation, thereby significantly boosting the electrocatalytic production of H₂O₂ via the two-electron (2e^-) ORR pathway. Combined spectroscopic analysis and density functional theory calculations reveal that the O-bridged interface facilitates electron transfer to surface Ni sites, strengthening O₂ adsorption in an "end-on" configuration and favoring the 2e^- ORR mechanism. The resulting O-bridged NiSe₂/CQDs catalyst exhibits outstanding 2e^- ORR performance under alkaline conditions, achieving a high H₂O₂ production rate of 7458.24 mmol g_cat^-1 h^-1 at 31.25 mA cm^-2 and a Faradaic efficiency of 92.88% at 0.5 V. The efficient degradation of the Rhodamine B and Methylene Blue is achieved by utilizing the electrolyte obtained after the H₂O₂ electrosynthesis process as a Fenton reagent. This study demonstrates that rational tailoring of interfacial charge distribution in hybrid catalysts provides an effective strategy for enhancing catalytic performance, offering a promising design principle for advanced electrocatalysts.

Key words: Two-electron oxygen reduction reaction, Nickel selenides, Oxygen-doped carbon quantum dots, Hydrogen peroxide production, Electronic structure

徐芊牵, 钟海红, 李纯莉, 姜蓉, 冯拥军, Luis Alberto Estudillo-Wong. O桥联NiSe₂/CQDs复合材料: 协同调控界面电子转移实现H₂O₂高效电合成[J]. 催化学报, 2026, 85: 258-271.

Qianqian Xu, Haihong Zhong, Chunli Li, Rong Jiang, Yongjun Feng, Luis Alberto Estudillo-Wong. O-bridged NiSe₂/CQDs composite synergistically triggers interfacial electrons transfer to promote H₂O₂ electrosynthesis[J]. Chinese Journal of Catalysis, 2026, 85: 258-271.

×
扫码分享

导出引用管理器 EndNote|Ris|BibTeX

链接本文: https://www.cjcatal.com/CN/10.1016/S1872-2067(26)65029-2

https://www.cjcatal.com/CN/Y2026/V85/I6/258

图/表 5

Fig. 1. (a) Schematic illustration for the synthesis process of NiSe2-O-CQDs. XRD patterns of NiSe2 (b) and NiSe2-O-CQDs-10:1 (c) fitted by the Rietveld Refinement (RR) analysis. HRTEM (d) and EDX elemental mapping (e) images of the NiSe2-O-CQDs-10:1. XPS spectra of Ni 2p (e) and Se 3d (f) for NiSe2, O-CQDs and NiSe2-O-CQDs-X:1 (X = 5, 10 and 20).

Fig. 2. XAS analysis of the NiSe2 and NiSe2-O-CQDs-10:1. (a) XANES spectra at Ni K-edge (insert: the enlarged image). (b) FT-EXAFS spectra of Ni R space. (c) XANES spectra at Se K-edge (insert: the enlarged image). (d) FT-EXAFS spectra of Se R space. WT of Ni K-edge EXAFS (e) and Se K-edge EXAFS (f) for NiSe2, NiSe2-O-CQDs-10:1 and the reference samples, respectively.

Fig. 3. (a) RRDE polarization curves of NiSe2, O-CQDs, and NiSe2-O-CQDs-X:1 (X = 5, 10, 20) recorded at 1600 rpm in O2-saturated 0.1 mol L-1 KOH. (b) H2O2 selectivity and electron transfer number (n) against applied potentials. (c) the corresponding Tafel plots. (d) The calculated transfer electron number (n) of NiSe2, O-CQDs, and NiSe2-O-CQDs-X:1 (X = 5, 10, 20) based on the Koutecky-Levich equation. In-situ ATR-IR spectra of NiSe2-O-CQDs-10:1 catalyst in O2-saturated 0.1 mol L-1 KOH electrolyte at various applied potentials (e1) and zoomed portion of OOHad intermediate emergences (e2). (f) Schematic illustration of 2e- transfer associative mechanism to produce H2O2.

Fig. 4. DFT calculations. (a) Configuration of O2 molecules adsorbed at Ni1 sites in NiSe2 and NiSe2-O-CQDs, respectively. The fluorescent green, silvery, red, brown and white balls represent Se, Ni, O, C and H atoms, respectively. (b) Comparison of binding energy for O2 molecules adsorbed at different sites (Ni and Se atoms). (c) Gibbs free energy diagram of 2e- ORR pathway at U = 0.7 V. Gibbs free energy diagram of 2e- and 4e- ORR pathways for NiSe2-O-CQDs (d) and NiSe2 (e) at U = 0 V. (f) Electron density difference analysis of NiSe2 and NiSe2-O-CQDs, yellow (cyan) represents the charge accumulation (deletion). Total density of states and PDOS for NiSe2-O-CQDs (g) and NiSe2 (h). COHP analysis of NiSe2-O-CQDs (i) and NiSe2 (j).

Fig. 5. Electrochemical production of H2O2 using a continuous flow cell. (a) Schematic diagram of the assembled flow cell. (b) H2O2 yield and Faraday efficiency recorded at different applied potentials. (c) Cumulative H2O2 yield of NiSe2-O-CQDs-10:1 for 100 h and O-CQDs for 55 h. (d) Stability test (chronopotentiometry) of NiSe2-O-CQDs-10:1 and O-CQD. (e) H2O2 yield and Faraday efficiency of NiSe2-O-CQDs-10:1 in comparison with recently reported catalysts (The H2O2 production yield for catalysts, such as o-CQD-3, Ni-N-C, Bi/PNC-4, Co-N-C, Ni-N2O2/C, and CoPc@OCW obtained in a flow cell with 0.1 mol L-1 KOH. For c-MOF Ni-250, the H2O2 production yield was obtained in a single-chamber cell with 0.1 mol L-1 KOH; for the COF-366-Co, DCDs, S10RGO, 2D Al-MOF, an H-type cell with 0.1 mol L-1 KOH was used; for the NiSe2-O-CQDs-10:1 (this work), SC-1, Ni-SAC, Sb-NSCF, Zn2SnO4/SnO2, and Sb-NSCF, a flow cell with 1 mol L-1 KOH was used. (f) Digital photographs of Rh B and MB during the decomposition process. (g) Degradation performance of Rhodamine B and Methylene Blue by the catholyte after electrolysis for 1 h.

参考文献

[1]	Y. Sun K,. Fan J,. Li L,. Wang Y,. Yang Z,. Li M,. Shao X. Duan, Nat. Commun., 2024, 15, 6098.
[2]	Y. Bu R,. Ma Y,. Wang Y,. Zhao F,. Li G.-F., Han J.-B. Baek, Adv. Mater., 2024, 36, 2412670.
[3]	C. Kim S. O., Park S. K., Kwak Z,. Xia G,. Kim L. Dai, Nat. Commun., 2023, 14, 5822.
[4]	M. Liu C,. Liu T,. Yang S,. Hu S,. Li S,. Liu Y,. Liu Y,. Chen B,. Ge S. Gao, Chin. J. Catal., 2024, 66, 212-222.
[5]	H. Chen, C. He, H. Niu, C. Xia, F.-M. Li, W. Zhao, F. Song, T. Yao, Y. Chen, Y. Su, W. Guo, B.-Y. Xia, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2024, 146, 15356-15365.
[6]	X. Yang, L. Zhong, S. Ye, D. He, S. Yuan, H. Li, Y. Ma, X. Mo, S. Gan, L. Niu, J. Mater. Sci. Technol., 2025, 204, 268-275.
[7]	S. Liang, F. Li, F. Huang, X. Wang, S. Liu, Chin. J. Catal., 2025, 76, 81-95.
[8]	J. Nie Z,. Li W,. Liu Z,. Sang D.-A., Yang L,. Wang F,. Hou J. Liang, Adv. Mater., 2025, 37, 2420236.
[9]	N. Wang, S. Ma, P. Zuo, J. Duan, B. Hou, Adv. Sci., 2021, 8, 2100076.
[10]	M. Melchionna, P. Fornasiero, M. Prato, Adv. Mater., 2019, 31, 1802920.
[11]	M. Dan R,. Zhong S,. Hu H,. Wu Y,. Zhou Z.-Q. Liu, Chem Catal., 2022, 2, 1919-1960.
[12]	S. Siahrostami, A. Verdaguer-Casadevall, M. Karamad, D. Deiana, P. Malacrida, B. Wickman, M. Escudero-Escribano, E. A. Paoli, R. Frydendal, T. W. Hansen, I. Chorkendorff, I. E. L. Stephens, J. Rossmeisl, Nat. Mater., 2013, 12, 1137-1143.
[13]	J. S. Jirkovský, I. Panas E,. Ahlberg M,. Halasa S,. Romani D. J. Schiffrin, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2011, 133, 19432-19441.
[14]	L. Zhang, J. Liang, L. Yue, Z. Xu, K. Dong, Q. Liu, Y. Luo, T. Li, X. Cheng, G. Cui, B. Tang, A. Ali Alshehri, K. A. Alzahrani, X. Guo, X. Sun, Nano Res., 2022, 15, 304-309.
[15]	J. Wang, J. Huang, C. Jia, W. Chen, J. Chen, S. Lin, Y. Liu, K. Chen, Y. Liang, S. Ci, Z. Wen, Angew. Chem. Int. Ed., 2025, 64, e202510645.
[16]	I. Mondal, H. Sheng, K. Lee, S. Jin, J. R. Schmidt, ACS Catal., 2025, 15, 8788-8798.
[17]	Z. Deng, L. Li, Y. Ren, C. Ma, J. Liang, K. Dong, Q. Liu, Y. Luo, T. Li, B. Tang, Y. Liu, S. Gao, A. M. Asiri, S. Yan, X. Sun, Nano Res., 2022, 15, 3880-3885.
[18]	Y. Deng, S. Xiao, Y. Zheng, X. Rong, M. Bai, Y. Tang, T. Ma, C. Cheng, C. Zhao, Chem. Eng. J., 2023, 451, 138514.
[19]	J. Du Y,. Liu M,. Sun J,. Guan A,. Chen B. Han, Angew. Chem. Int. Ed., 2025, 64, e202503385.
[20]	Y. Wen Y,. Fang B,. Huang T,. Zhang C,. Cai B,. Niu H,. Wang Q,. Guo S,. Ding G,. Yao X,. Qian Y,. Zhao J. Energy Chem., 2025, 108, 181-189.
[21]	Y. Wang, H. Yang, Z. Liu, K. Yin, Z. Wang, H. Huang, Y. Liu, Z. Kang, Z. Chen, J. Energy Chem., 2023, 87, 247-255.
[22]	C. Zhang, R. Lu, C. Liu, J. Lu, Y. Zou, L. Yuan, J. Wang, G. Wang, Y. Zhao, C. Yu, Adv. Sci., 2022, 9, 2104768.
[23]	Y. Wang, C. Han, L. Ma, T. Duan, Y. Du, J. Wu, J.-J. Zou, J. Gao, X.-D. Zhu, Y.-C. Zhang, Small, 2024, 20, 2309448.
[24]	Q. Yuan, J. Zhao, D. H. Mok, Z. Zheng, Y. Ye, C. Liang, L. Zhou, S. Back, K. Jiang, Nano Lett., 2022, 22, 1257-1264.
[25]	Z. Huang, S. Yuan, T. Zhang, B. Cai, B. Xu, X. Lu, L. Fan, F. Dai, D. Sun, Appl. Catal. B, 2020, 272, 118976.
[26]	H. Sheng, A. N. Janes, R. D. Ross, D. Kaiman, J. Huang, B. Song, J. R. Schmidt, S. Jin, Energy Environ. Sci., 2020, 13, 4189-4203.
[27]	V. C. Hoang, K. Dave V. G. Gomes, Nano Energy, 2019, 66, 104093.
[28]	S. Wu X,. Wang J,. Bai Y,. Zhu X,. Yu F,. Qin P,. He L. Ren, Langmuir, 2022, 38, 11210-11218.
[29]	J. Wu Y,. Han Y,. Bai X,. Wang Y,. Zhou W,. Zhu T,. He Y,. Wang H,. Huang Y,. Liu Z. Kang, Adv. Funct. Mater., 2022, 32, 2203647.
[30]	Y. Zhang, H. Feng, Y. Song, S. Yu, C. Zhang, Y. Feng, M. Shao, J. Hu, Appl. Catal. B, 2026, 384, 126156.
[31]	P. M. Gómez-Largo, C. D. Miranda A. C., Villagrán-Olivares C. A., López B. P. Barbero, Mol. Catal., 2022, 530, 112639.
[32]	J. Zhang, G. Zhang, S. Jin, Y. Zhou, Q. Ji, H. Lan, H. Liu, J. Qu, Carbon, 2020, 163, 154-161.
[33]	A. B. Bourlinos, A. K. Rathi M. B., Gawande K,. Hola A,. Goswami S,. Kalytchuk M. A., Karakassides A,. Kouloumpis D,. Gournis Y,. Deligiannakis E. P., Giannelis R. Zboril, Appl. Mater. Today, 2017, 7, 179-184.
[34]	W.-J. Niu, R.-H. Zhu, Yan-Hua, H.-B. Zeng, S. Cosnier, X.-J. Zhang, D. Shan, Carbon, 2016, 109, 402-410.
[35]	W. Zhou, L. Xie, J. Gao, R. Nazari, H. Zhao, X. Meng, F. Sun, G. Zhao, J. Ma, Chem. Eng. J., 2021, 410, 128368.
[36]	K. Guo Y,. Wang J,. Huang H,. Li Y,. Peng C. Xu, Chem. Eng. J., 2023, 454, 140488.
[37]	M. Chen, Y. Zhang, R. Wang, B. Zhang, B. Song, Y. Guan, S. Li, P. Xu, J. Energy Chem., 2023, 84, 173-180.
[38]	K. Xu H,. Zhong X,. Li J,. Song L. A., Estudillo-Wong J,. Yang Y,. Feng X,. Zhao N. Alonso-Vante, Small Sci., 2024, 4, 2300294.
[39]	Z. Luo H,. Yi Z,. Yang C. Wang, Small, 2024, 20, 2402954.
[40]	A. Kareem, T. Kathavarayan, S. Ramasamy, K. Prasanth, H. Mohanty, S. Pitchaimuthu, S. Sellappan, Mater. Today Chem., 2024, 38, 102104.
[41]	F. Wang, X. Zhao, Y. Li, L. Liang, K. Sasaki, Q. Hao, W. Yuan, S. Li, H. Liu, Appl. Catal. B, 2024, 348, 123830.
[42]	Z. Liu C,. Zhang H,. Liu L. Feng, Appl. Catal. B, 2020, 276, 119165.
[43]	Y. Guo R,. Zhang S,. Zhang H,. Hong Y,. Zhao Z,. Huang C,. Han H,. Li C. Zhi, Energy Environ. Sci., 2022, 15, 4167-4174.
[44]	L. Chen, Z.-H. Yin, J.-Y. Cui, C.-Q. Li, K. Song, H. Liu, J.-J. Wang, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2024, 146, 27090-27099.
[45]	S. Tao G,. Zhang B,. Qian J,. Yang S,. Chu C,. Sun D,. Wu W,. Chu L. Song, Appl. Catal. B, 2023, 330, 122600.
[46]	S. Liu F,. Wang J,. Wang Z,. Wang X,. He T,. Zhang Z,. Zhang Q,. Liu X,. Liu X. Zhang, Appl. Catal. B, 2024, 355, 124148.
[47]	Q. Yuan, M. Fan, Y. Zhao, J. Wu, J. Raj, Z. Wang, A. Wang, H. Sun, X. Xu, Y. Wu, K. Sun, J. Jiang, Appl. Catal. B, 2023, 324, 122195.
[48]	Y. Guo R,. Zhang S,. Zhang H,. Hong P,. Li Y,. Zhao Z,. Huang C. Zhi, Angew. Chem. Int. Ed., 2024, 63, e202401501.
[49]	Y. Wang, Y. Zhou, Y. Feng, X.-Y. Yu, Adv. Funct. Mater., 2022, 32, 2110734.
[50]	P. Cao X,. Quan X,. Nie K,. Zhao Y,. Liu S,. Chen H,. Yu J. G. Chen, Nat. Commun., 2023, 14, 172.
[51]	L.-Y. Dong, M.-H. Guan, Y.-Q. Ren, G.-P. Hao, A.-H. Lu, Renewables, 2023, 1, 562-571.
[52]	L. Xie C,. Liang Y,. Wu K,. Wang W,. Hou H,. Guo Z,. Wang Y. M., Lam Z,. Liu L. Wang, Small, 2024, 20, 2401253.
[53]	D. H. Mok, S., Back S. Siahrostami, Angew. Chem. Int. Ed., 2024, 63, e202404677.
[54]	B. Hammer, J. K. Norskov, Nature, 1995, 376, 238-240.
[55]	Z. Sang, Y. Qiao, R. Chen, L. Yin, F. Hou, J. Liang, Nat. Commun., 2025, 16, 4050.
[56]	N. Zhao, W. Luo, S. Li, H. Wang, Y. Mao, Y. Jiang, W. Wang, M. Li, W. Su, R. He, Adv. Sci., 2025, 12, 2411526.
[57]	H. Long, X. Zhang, Z. Zhang, J. Zhang, J. Yu, H. Yu, Nat. Commun., 2025, 16, 946.
[58]	W. Sun J,. Wang B,. Zhu J,. Chen J,. Liu M,. Xu Y. Sun, Mol. Catal., 2024, 553, 113707.
[59]	X. Lu J,. Wu X,. He Z,. Li Y,. Lu W,. Li J,. Li M,. Xu Y,. Qi Q,. Zhang Y,. Liu M,. Du T,. Kamiya H,. Hosono F,. Pan J.-S., Chen T.-N. Ye, Nat. Catal., 2025, 8, 536-547.
[60]	H. Sheng, A. N. Janes, R. D. Ross, H. Hofstetter, K. Lee, J. R. Schmidt, S. Jin, Nat. Catal., 2022, 5, 716-725.
[61]	Y. Liu J,. Guo Y,. Chen N,. Tan J. Wang, Environ. Sci. Technol., 2020, 54, 14085-14095.
[62]	S. Zhang, Y. Wang, C. Jiang, Y. Li, Z. Bao, H. Zhong, W. Fang, J. Wang, Small, 2024, 20, 2403862.
[63]	Y. Yang, A. Xu, Y. Ren, K. Li, K. Nie, Y. Huang, H. He, J. Xu, X. Yin, Appl. Catal. B, 2025, 361, 124625.

O桥联NiSe₂/CQDs复合材料: 协同调控界面电子转移实现H₂O₂高效电合成

O-bridged NiSe₂/CQDs composite synergistically triggers interfacial electrons transfer to promote H₂O₂ electrosynthesis

RichHTML

PDF

Supporting Information

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

扫码分享

图/表 5

参考文献

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

[1]	钟威, 甘义遥, 王敬涛, 杨沛颐, 孟爱云, 苏耀荣. 构建不对称结构单元实现近平衡的氢吸脱附增强a-ReS_xSe_2-_x助剂的光催化析氢活性[J]. 催化学报, 2026, 85(6): 322-332.
[2]	刘文宁, 安丽, 王金明, 李如玥, 牟洁, 龙永德, 曲丹, 刘弈畅, 胡宇翔, 汪夏燕, 蒋宁, 孙再成. 第三主族金属诱导的p-d轨道杂化提升Pd基金属烯在锌空气电池中的氧还原性能[J]. 催化学报, 2026, 84(5): 144-158.
[3]	刘彭, 段炼, 杨宝鹏, 孙铭伟, 陈根, 刘小鹤, 刘敏, 张宁. (CuGa)_xZn_1-2_xGa₂S₄半导体材料的表面电子结构调控及其光催化还原硝酸盐制氨性能[J]. 催化学报, 2026, 83(4): 172-182.
[4]	钟海红, 徐芊牵, 杨玮婷, ALONSO-VANTE Nicolas, 冯拥军. 铁族过渡金属硫属化合物组成调控以增强氧电极电催化性能[J]. 催化学报, 2026, 81(2): 37-68.
[5]	刘欢, 秉琦明, 于良, 邓德会. 面向高效乙炔加氢制乙烯的二硫化钨限域金属原子催化剂理论预测[J]. 催化学报, 2025, 76(9): 221-229.
[6]	梁诗诺, 李冯俊, 黄菲, 王心俣, 刘升卫. 轴向磷配位修饰Co-N₄活性中心促进双通道H₂O₂光合成[J]. 催化学报, 2025, 76(9): 81-95.
[7]	王啟航, 孟利, 李卓, 杨卓然, 汤意南, 余浪, 李志君, 孙建辉, 井立强. 钴单原子-磷酸功能化还原氧化石墨烯/苝四羧酸纳米片异质结用于高效光催化生产过氧化氢[J]. 催化学报, 2025, 75(8): 192-203.
[8]	朱晓辉, 邢浩然, 何光裕, 肖海, 陈银娟, 李隽. 石墨二炔负载的d⁸态Fe双原子催化剂耦合-解耦自旋态转换机制研究[J]. 催化学报, 2025, 74(7): 411-424.
[9]	张昊, 熊小松, 汪涛, 吴宇平. 动态氢插层催化[J]. 催化学报, 2025, 74(7): 1-3.
[10]	何雪璐, 马雯燕, 朱思腾, 李丹, 蒋加兴. 共轭多孔聚合物构建单元的电子结构匹配性对光催化析氢活性的影响[J]. 催化学报, 2025, 73(6): 279-288.
[11]	胡呈弘, 张悦, 张仪, 黄沁彤, 沈葵, 陈立宇, 李映伟. Sn电子调节器增强Fe位点电催化CO₂还原性能[J]. 催化学报, 2025, 72(5): 222-229.
[12]	亓文慧, 李秀艳, 顾少楠, 孙彬, 王轶男, 周国伟. 金属有机催化剂的电子结构调控在光催化产H₂O₂中的应用[J]. 催化学报, 2025, 77(10): 45-69.
[13]	刘志远, 王长安, 杨平, 王薇, 高鸿毅, 安国庆, 刘斯奇, 陈娟, 郭婷婷, 徐鑫梦, 王戈. MOFs中Pd纳米粒子的微环境和电子结构调控增强双环戊二烯低温加氢活性[J]. 催化学报, 2024, 64(9): 112-122.
[14]	杜仕文, 章福祥. 密度泛函理论在光催化中的普遍应用[J]. 催化学报, 2024, 61(6): 1-36.
[15]	王杰, 陈怡和, 王宇达, 赵浩, 叶进裕, 程庆庆, 杨辉. 调控Ru的电子态以促进乙烯在酸中高选择性电氧化合成乙二醇[J]. 催化学报, 2024, 60(5): 376-385.