硫中毒对Co3O4/CeO2复合氧化物上炭黑催化燃烧的影响

doi:10.1016/S1872-2067(14)60088-7

催化学报 ›› 2014, Vol. 35 ›› Issue (9): 1504-1510.DOI: 10.1016/S1872-2067(14)60088-7

硫中毒对Co₃O₄/CeO₂复合氧化物上炭黑催化燃烧的影响

石晓燕^a, 余运波^a, 薛莉^b, 贺泓^a

a 中国科学院生态环境研究中心, 北京100085;
b 山东理工大学化学工程学院, 山东淄博255049

收稿日期:2014-02-23 修回日期:2014-03-21 出版日期:2014-08-19 发布日期:2014-08-22
通讯作者: 贺泓
基金资助:
国家重点基础研究发展计划（973计划，2010CB732304）；国家环境保护大气复合污染来源与控制重点实验室开放基金（SCAPC201302）.

Effect of sulfur poisoning on Co₃O₄/CeO₂ composite oxide catalyst for soot combustion

Xiaoyan Shi^a, Yunbo Yu^a, Li Xue^b, Hong He^a

a Research Center for Eco-Environmental Sciences, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100085, China;
b School of Chemical Engineering, Shandong University of Technology, Zibo 255049, Shandong, China

Received:2014-02-23 Revised:2014-03-21 Online:2014-08-19 Published:2014-08-22
Supported by:
This work was supported by the National Basic Research Program of China (973 Program, 2010CB732304) and the State Environmental Protection Key Laboratory of Sources and Control of Air Pollution Complex (SCAPC201302).

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

采用共沉淀法制备了CeO₂，Co₃O₄和一系列Co₃O₄/CeO₂复合氧化物催化剂，在400 ℃下含SO₂的氧化气氛中对催化剂进行了硫中毒处理，通过原位红外光谱、X射线衍射、程序升温脱附和X射线光电子能谱对新鲜和硫中毒的样品进行了表征. 结果表明，所有测试的硫中毒样品上均形成了硫酸盐，CeO₂上累积的硫酸盐明显比Co₃O₄上的多，Co₃O₄/CeO₂复合氧化物在硫中毒过程中形成了硫酸钴和硫酸铈. 对新鲜和硫化样品在NO/O₂气氛下进行了催化炭黑燃烧实验，发现Co₃O₄/CeO₂复合氧化物的活性和抗硫性能优于CeO₂，但抗硫性能低于Co₃O₄.

关键词: 炭黑氧化, 氧化钴, 氧化铈, 复合氧化物, 硫中毒

Abstract:

CeO₂, Co₃O₄, and a series of Co₃O₄/CeO₂composite oxides prepared by co-precipitation were exposed to SO₂ under an oxidizing environment at 400 ℃. These fresh and SO₂-poisoned samples were characterized by in situ diffuse reflectance infrared Fourier transform spectroscopy, X-ray diffraction, temperature-programmed desorption, and X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy. Sulfates were formed on the oxides, with more sulfates on CeO₂ than on Co₃O₄. On the Co₃O₄/CeO₂composite oxides, both cobalt sulphate and ceria sulfate were formed. Fresh and sulfated samples were tested for soot combustion in a NO/O₂ gas flow. The Co₃O₄/CeO₂composite oxides showed better SO₂tolerance and higher activity than CeO₂ but were more easily poisoned by SO₂than Co₃O₄.

Key words: Soot oxidation, Cobalt oxide, Ceria, Composite oxide, Sulfur poisoning

石晓燕, 余运波, 薛莉, 贺泓. 硫中毒对Co₃O₄/CeO₂复合氧化物上炭黑催化燃烧的影响[J]. 催化学报, 2014, 35(9): 1504-1510.

Xiaoyan Shi, Yunbo Yu, Li Xue, Hong He. Effect of sulfur poisoning on Co₃O₄/CeO₂ composite oxide catalyst for soot combustion[J]. Chinese Journal of Catalysis, 2014, 35(9): 1504-1510.

×
扫码分享

导出引用管理器 EndNote|Ris|BibTeX

链接本文: https://www.cjcatal.com/CN/10.1016/S1872-2067(14)60088-7

https://www.cjcatal.com/CN/Y2014/V35/I9/1504

参考文献

[1] Neeft J P A, Makkee M, Moulijn J A. Appl Catal B, 1996, 8: 57
[2] Liu J, Zhao Z, Xu C M. Chin J Catal (刘坚, 赵震, 徐春明. 催化学报), 2004, 25: 673
[3] van Setten B A A L, Makkee M, Moulijn J A. Catal Rev-Sci Eng, 2001, 43: 489
[4] Setiabudi A, Chen J L, Mul G, Makkee M, Moulijn J A. Appl Catal B, 2004, 51: 9
[5] Weng D, Li J, Wu X D, Lin F. Catal Commun, 2008, 9: 1898
[6] Harrison P G, Ball I K, Daniell W, Lukinskas P, Céspedes M, Miró E E, Ulla M A. Chem Eng J, 2003, 95: 47
[7] Dhakad M, Mitshuhashi T, Rayalu S, Doggali P, Bakardjiva S, Subrt J, Fino D, Haneda H, Labhsetwar N. Catal Today, 2008, 132: 188
[8] Liu J, Zhao Z, Wang J Q, Xu C M, Duan A J, Jiang G Y, Yang Q. Appl Catal B, 2008, 84: 185
[9] Sheng Y Q, Zhou Y, Lu H F, Zhang Z K, Chen Y F. Chin J Catal (盛叶琴, 周瑛, 卢晗锋, 张泽凯, 陈银飞. 催化学报), 2013, 34: 567
[10] Bueno-López A. Appl Catal B, 2014, 146: 1
[11] Shan W J, Yang L H, Ma N, Yang J L. Chin J Catal (单文娟, 杨利花, 马娜, 杨佳丽. 催化学报), 2012, 33: 970
[12] Aneggi E, Divins N J, de Leitenburg C, Llorca J, Trovarelli A. J Catal, 2014, 312: 191
[13] Liotta L F, Di Carlo G, Pantaleo G, Venezia A M, Deganello G. Appl Catal B, 2006, 66: 217
[14] Kang M, Song M W, Lee C H. Appl Catal B, 2003, 251: 143
[15] van Setten B A A L, Schouten J M, Makkee M, Moulijn J A. Appl Catal B, 2000, 28: 253
[16] Teraoka Y, Nakano K, Kagawa S, Shangguan W F. Appl Catal B, 1995, 5: L181
[17] Fino D, Russo N, Saracco G, Specchia V. J Catal, 2003, 217: 367
[18] Luo T, Vohs J M, Gorte R J. J Catal, 2002, 210: 397
[19] Smirnov M Yu, Kalinkin A V, Pashis A V, Sorokin A M, Noskov A S, Kharas K C, Bukhtiyarov V I. J Phys Chem B, 2005, 109: 11712
[20] Teterin Yu A, Teterin A Yu, Lebedev A M, Utkin I O. J Electron Spec Related Pheno, 1998, 88-91: 275
[21] Liotta L F, Carlo G, Pantaleo G, Venezia A M, Deganello G. Top Catal, 2009, 52: 1989
[22] Goodman A L, P Li Usher C R, Grassian V H. J Phys Chem A, 2001, 105: 6109
[23] Luo T, Gorte R J. Appl Catal B, 2004, 53: 77
[24] Waqif M, Bazin P, Saur O, Lavalley J C, Blanchard G, Touret O. Appl Catal B, 1997, 11: 193
[25] Mul G, Kapteijn F, Doornkamp C, Moulijn J A. J Catal, 1998, 179: 258
[26] Peralta M A, Milt V G, Cornaglia L M, Querini C A. J Catal, 2006, 242: 118

硫中毒对Co₃O₄/CeO₂复合氧化物上炭黑催化燃烧的影响

Effect of sulfur poisoning on Co₃O₄/CeO₂ composite oxide catalyst for soot combustion

PDF

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

扫码分享

参考文献

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

[1]	白雪, 段志遥, 南兵, 王黎明, 唐甜蜜, 管景奇. 揭示超薄Co-Fe层状双氢氧化物析氧反应的活性位点[J]. 催化学报, 2022, 43(8): 2240-2248.
[2]	王翔, 李美俊, 吴自力. 二氧化铈催化剂的氧化还原和酸碱性质的原位光谱表征[J]. 催化学报, 2021, 42(12): 2122-2140.
[3]	董春燕, 周燕, 塔娜, 刘雯璐, 李名润, 申文杰. 氧化铈形貌对Pd纳米粒子分散的影响[J]. 催化学报, 2021, 42(12): 2234-2241.
[4]	林炳裕, 吴玉远, 方笔耘, 李春艳, 倪军, 王秀云, 林建新, 江莉龙. 氧化铈负载钌催化剂中钌表面密度对氨合成活性和氢中毒的影响[J]. 催化学报, 2021, 42(10): 1712-1723.
[5]	杨彬, 邓威, 郭利民, 石原逹己. 铜-氧化铈固溶体催化剂用于二氧化碳催化加氢制甲醇[J]. 催化学报, 2020, 41(9): 1348-1359.
[6]	Sara Colussi, Paolo Fornasiero, Alessandro Trovarelli. Pd/CeO₂甲烷氧化催化剂的构效关系[J]. 催化学报, 2020, 41(6): 938-950.
[7]	James Kammert, Jisue Moon, Zili Wu. 二氧化铈与氢气之间相互作用及其在炔烃选择加氢中的应用[J]. 催化学报, 2020, 41(6): 901-914.
[8]	周燕, 陈阿玲, 宁静, 申文杰. 铜-氧化铈界面:几何及电子结构[J]. 催化学报, 2020, 41(6): 928-937.
[9]	Linxi Wang, Shyam Deo, Kerry Dooley, Michael J. Janik, Robert M. Rioux. 金属核及氧化铈的物理化学性质对一氧化碳氧化的影响[J]. 催化学报, 2020, 41(6): 951-962.
[10]	安静华, 王业红, 张志鑫, 张健, Martin Gocyla, Rafal E. Dunin-Borkowski, 王峰. Ru/CeO₂催化剂催化苯乙烯氢甲氧基羰基化反应高选择性制备直链酯类化合物[J]. 催化学报, 2020, 41(6): 963-969.
[11]	Md. Nurnobi Rashed, Abeda Sultana Touchy, Chandan Chaudhari, Jaewan Jeon, S. M. A. Hakim Siddiki, Takashi Toyao, Ken-ichi Shimizu. 多相CeO₂催化剂上氧化吲哚与醛的选择性C3烯基化反应[J]. 催化学报, 2020, 41(6): 970-976.
[12]	Yaroslava Lykhach, Tomá? Skála, Armin Neitzel, Nataliya Tsud, Klára Beranová, Kevin C. Prince, Vladimír Matolín, J?rg Libuda. 铈基模型催化剂的纳米结构:有序CeO₂(111)薄膜上的Pt-Co纳米颗粒[J]. 催化学报, 2020, 41(6): 985-997.
[13]	Aisulu Aitbekova, Cody J. Wrasman, Andrew R. Riscoe, Larissa Y. Kunz, Matteo Cargnello. 金属纳米粒子再分散法测定二氧化铈稳定的单原子的位点数[J]. 催化学报, 2020, 41(6): 998-1005.
[14]	廖文敏, 赵培培, 岑丙横, 贾爱平, 鲁继青, 罗孟飞. Co-Cr-O复合氧化物上丙烷低温完全氧化:结构效应、反应动力学和原位光谱研究[J]. 催化学报, 2020, 41(3): 442-453.
[15]	李露露, 李佩晓, 谭伟, 马凯莉, 邹伟欣, 汤常金, 董林. 表面Mo修饰提高CeTiO_x催化剂低温脱硝性能[J]. 催化学报, 2020, 41(2): 364-373.