黑磷夹层氧化钴纳米片构筑电催化水氧化的仿生通道

doi:10.1016/S1872-2067(21)63937-2

催化学报 ›› 2022, Vol. 43 ›› Issue (4): 1123-1130.DOI: 10.1016/S1872-2067(21)63937-2

黑磷夹层氧化钴纳米片构筑电催化水氧化的仿生通道

高学庆^a, 刘肖梦^b, 杨树姣^a, 张伟^a^,^*(), 林海平^b^,^c^,^#(), 曹睿^a^,^$()

^a陕西师范大学化学化工学院应用表面与胶体化学教育部重点实验室, 陕西西安710119
^b陕西师范大学物理学与信息技术学院, 陕西西安710119
^c苏州大学功能纳米与软物质研究院, 江苏苏州215123

收稿日期:2021-07-14 接受日期:2021-07-14 出版日期:2022-03-05 发布日期:2022-03-01
通讯作者: 张伟,林海平,曹睿
基金资助:
陕西师范大学科研启动基金;国家自然科学基金(21773146);国家自然科学基金(21872092)

Black phosphorus incorporated cobalt oxide: Biomimetic channels for electrocatalytic water oxidation

Xueqing Gao^a, Xiaomeng Liu^b, Shujiao Yang^a, Wei Zhang^a^,^*(), Haiping Lin^b^,^c^,^#(), Rui Cao^a^,^$()

^aKey Laboratory of Applied Surface and Colloid Chemistry, Ministry of Education, School of Chemistry and Chemical Engineering, Shaanxi Normal University, Xi’an 710119, Shaanxi, China
^bSchool of Physics & Information Technology, Shaanxi Normal University, Xi’an 710119, Shaanxi, China
^cInstitute of Functional Nano & Soft Materials (FUNSOM), Soochow University, Suzhou 215123, Jiangsu, China

Received:2021-07-14 Accepted:2021-07-14 Online:2022-03-05 Published:2022-03-01
Contact: Wei Zhang, Haiping Lin, Rui Cao
Supported by:
Starting Research Funds of Shaanxi Normal University;National Natural Science Foundation of China(21773146);National Natural Science Foundation of China(21872092)

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

不论在自然光合作用系统中, 还是在人工能量转换系统如电解水制氢、二氧化碳还原、电化学固氮和金属空气电池中, 析氧反应(OER)均是一个非常重要的半反应. OER具有多电子、多质子的特性, 反应过程复杂且动力学缓慢. 在自然界水氧化过程中, 光合系统II中的氨基酸残基构筑了专门的质子转移通道和电子转移通道, 通过质子耦合电子转移来高效输运质子和电子, 表现出很高的OER活性. 向自然界学习, 在催化剂中设计专门的质子转移通道和电子转移通道具有重要意义.
本文报道了一种片状氧化钴(CoO)、黑磷(BP)和还原氧化石墨烯(RGO)杂化电催化剂, 其中BP通过P-O键夹于RGO和CoO之间. 广泛分布的P-O键网络构成质子受体并形成质子转移通道, 起到了类似光合系统II中Asp61的质子转移作用. 最内层的核层RGO作为集流体, 形成电子转移通道, 模拟了光合系统II中Tyr161的电荷转移功能. 最外层包覆的CoO层作为水氧化反应的活性位点.
X射线衍射结果表明, 杂化电催化剂(CoO-BP-RGO)的衍射峰对应于六方晶系的RGO、正交晶系的BP和立方晶系的CoO. 弱而宽的CoO峰表明其具有较低的结晶度和超薄纳米薄片特征. 拉曼(Raman)结果表明, BP的平面结构几乎保持不变, 发生的部分氧化来自于BP与CoO或GO的氧之间形成的P-O键. 扫描电镜和透射电镜结果表明, BP夹在RGO和CoO纳米薄片之间, CoO的晶格条纹不连续且缺陷较多, CoO的(200)面暴露在最外层, 且平行于BP和RGO平面. X射线光电子能谱(XPS)测试中, 通过氩气溅射去除部分表面CoO后, P-P信号增强, 进一步说明了CoO-BP-RGO样品含有BP夹层. 氩气溅射后, P-O-Co信号增强, 并出现了P-O-C键的信号, 证明了CoO-BP-RGO杂化中P-O-Co和P-O-C键的形成. CoO-BP-RGO样品60 天后的XPS分析几乎没有变化, 说明CoO-BP-RGO样品在周围环境条件下非常稳定. 通过计算研究表明, 周围的P-O键对CoO的水氧化反应具有促进作用, 羟基在CoO上的结合减弱, 加速HO*的解离, 在低电势下可以通过新的反应途径生成HOO*. pH依赖性实验和电化学交流阻抗实验也证实了CoO-BP-RGO中的P-O键能促进质子传导. 这些特性赋予CoO-BP-RGO杂化材料较好的OER性能, 电流密度达到10 mA cm^-2, 仅需206 mV过电位. 该工作通过构筑专门的仿生通道, 即质子转移通道和电子转移通道, 加速电子和质子的转移, 降低水氧化的活化能, 提升催化剂的析氧性能, 这为水氧化电催化剂的设计提供了新的指导.

关键词: 电催化, 水氧化, 析氧反应, 质子转移, 电子转移

Abstract:

Learning from nature photosynthesis, the development of efficient artificial catalysts for water oxidation is an ongoing challenge. Herein, a lamellar cobalt oxide (CoO), black phosphorus (BP) and reduced graphene oxide (RGO) hybrid electrocatalyst is reported. BP domains are anchored on RGO and coated with CoO via P-O bonds. The widespread P-O bond network constitutes the proton acceptor and forms a proton exit channel, akin to the use of Asp61 in Photosystem II (PSII). The innermost kernel layer RGO serves as the current collector and forms an electron exit channel, mimicking the function of Tyr161 for charge transfer. The outermost encapsulation CoO layer acts as water oxidation catalyst (WOC). These biology-inspired features endow an outstanding OER performance of the hybrid material with a low overpotential of 206 mV at a current density of 10 mA cm^-2. This work provides a new design guide for OER electrocatalysts through constructing two specialized channels for proton and electron transfer.

Key words: Electrocatalysis, Water oxidation, Oxygen evolution reaction, Proton transfer, Electron transfer

高学庆, 刘肖梦, 杨树姣, 张伟, 林海平, 曹睿. 黑磷夹层氧化钴纳米片构筑电催化水氧化的仿生通道[J]. 催化学报, 2022, 43(4): 1123-1130.

Xueqing Gao, Xiaomeng Liu, Shujiao Yang, Wei Zhang, Haiping Lin, Rui Cao. Black phosphorus incorporated cobalt oxide: Biomimetic channels for electrocatalytic water oxidation[J]. Chinese Journal of Catalysis, 2022, 43(4): 1123-1130.

×
扫码分享

导出引用管理器 EndNote|Ris|BibTeX

链接本文: https://www.cjcatal.com/CN/10.1016/S1872-2067(21)63937-2

https://www.cjcatal.com/CN/Y2022/V43/I4/1123

图/表 7

Fig. 1. Illustration of biomimetic channels in CoO-BP-RGO. Electron and proton transfers in natural PSII (a) and artificial CoO-BP-RGO electrocatalyst (b).

Fig. 2. The illustration of the preparation and structure of CoO-BP-RGO with P-O bonds.

Fig. 3. (a) XRD patterns of CoO-BP-RGO, BP and GO (inset); (b) Raman spectrum of CoO-BP-RGO; The illustration of graphene (c), BP (d), and CoO (e).

Fig. 4. SEM (a) and TEM (b?e) images of CoO-BP-RGO; The corresponding HAADF STEM image (f) and EDX mapping (g) and line scanning patterns (h) of CoO-BP-RGO.

Fig. 5. Narrow scan C 1s (a), Co 2p (b), P 2p (c), and O 1s (d) XPS spectra of CoO-BP-RGO.

Fig. 6. Electrocatalytic water oxidation performances. (a) LSV polarization curves of CoO-BP-RGO, CoO-RGO, CoO-BP and BP samples; (b) The overpotentials required for j = 10 and 100 mA cm?2with different samples; (c) Tafel plots for OER of the samples; (d) Multi-current chronopotentiometry of CoO-BP-RGO with current densities from 40 to 700 mA cm?2at current ramps of 60 mA cm?2per step without iR compensation.

Fig. 7. Computational calculation of CoO-BP-RGO. The calculated free energy diagrams of OER on P-O functionalized hydroxylated CoO(100) surface. Co, H, P, lattice O and O from solution are represented with blue, white, pink, red and orange spheres, respectively.

参考文献

[1]	X. Gao, Y. Chen, T. Sun, J. Huang, W. Zhang, Q. Wang, R. Cao, Energy Environ. Sci., 2020, 13, 174-182.
[2]	J. Qi, Y.-P. Lin, D. Chen, T. Zhou, W. Zhang, R. Cao, Angew. Chem. Int. Ed., 2020, 59, 8917-8921.
[3]	W.-J. Kwak, Rosy, D. Sharon, C. Xia, H. Kim, L. R. Johnson, P. G. Bruce, L. F. Nazar, Y.-K. Sun, A. A. Frimer, M. Noked, S. A. Freunberger, D. Aurbach, Chem. Rev., 2020, 120, 6626-6683.
[4]	T. Ouyang, Y. Ye, C. Wu, K. Xiao, Z. Liu, Angew. Chem. Int. Ed., 2019, 58, 4923-4928.
[5]	C. Wu, X. Zhang, H. Li, Z. Xia, S. Yu, S. Wang, G. Sun, Chin. J. Catal., 2021, 42, 637-647.
[6]	B. Mondal, S. Chattopadhyay, S. Dey, A. Mahammed, K. Mittra, A. Rana, Z. Gross, A. Dey, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2020, 142, 21040-21049.
[7]	Y. Zhang, Y. Chen, Z. Liang, J. Qi, X. Gao, W. Zhang, R. Cao, Chin. J. Catal., 2019, 40, 1860-1866.
[8]	Y. Hao, Y. Li, J. Wu, L. Meng, J. Wang, C. Jia, T. Liu, X. Yang, Z.-P. Liu, M. Gong, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2021, 143, 1493-1502.
[9]	S. Zhou, J. Qin, X. Zhao, J. Yang, Chin. J. Catal., 2021, 42, 571-582.
[10]	M. Suga, F. Akita, K. Hirata, G. Ueno, H. Murakami, Y. Nakajima, T. Shimizu, K. Yamashita, M. Yamamoto, H. Ago, J. R. Shen, Nature, 2015, 517, 99-103.
[11]	Y. Shao, X. Xiao, Y.-P. Zhu, T.-Y. Ma, Angew. Chem. Int. Ed., 2019, 58, 14599-14604.
[12]	Y. Umena, K. Kawakami, J. R. Shen, N. Kamiya, Nature, 2011, 473, 55-60.
[13]	J. Schneider, R. E. Bangle, W. B. Swords, L. Troian-Gautier, G. J. Meyer, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2019, 141, 9758-9763.
[14]	T. J. Meyer, M. H. V. Huynh, H. H. Thorp, Angew. Chem. Int. Ed., 2007, 46, 5284-5304.
[15]	H. Bao, R. L. Burnap, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A., 2015, 112, E6139-E6147.
[16]	J. Yano, V. Yachandra, Chem. Rev., 2014, 114, 4175-4205.
[17]	T. Zhang, C. Wang, S. Liu, J. L. Wang, W. Lin, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2014, 136, 273-281.
[18]	S. Ye, C. Ding, R. Chen, F. Fan, P. Fu, H. Yin, X. Wang, Z. Wang, P. Du, C. Li, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2018, 140, 3250-3256.
[19]	K. Zhang, B. Jin, C. Park, Y. Cho, X. Song, X. Shi, S. Zhang, W. Kim, H. Zeng, J. H. Park, Nat. Commun., 2019, 10, 2001.
[20]	J. Wang, D. Liu, H. Huang, N. Yang, B. Yu, M. Wen, X. Wang, P. K. Chu, X.-F. Yu, Angew. Chem. Int. Ed., 2018, 57, 2600-2604.
[21]	M. Z. Rahman, C. W. Kwong, K. Davey, S. Z. Qiao, Energy Environ. Sci., 2016, 9, 709-728.
[22]	Q. Jiang, L. Xu, N. Chen, H. Zhang, L. Dai, S. Wang, Angew. Chem. Int. Ed., 2016, 55, 13849-13853.
[23]	Z. Yuan, J. Li, M. Yang, Z. Fang, J. Jian, D. Yu, X. Chen, L. Dai, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2019, 141, 4972-4979.
[24]	Z. Liu, Y. Sun, H. Cao, D. Xie, W. Li, J. Wang, A. K. Cheetham, Nat. Commun., 2020, 11, 3917.
[25]	W. Lei, G. Liu, J. Zhang, M. Liu, Chem. Soc. Rev., 2017, 46, 3492-3509.
[26]	H. Shuai, P. Ge, W. Hong, S. Li, J. Hu, H. Hou, G. Zou, X. Ji, Small Methods, 2019, 3, 1800328.
[27]	X. Han, J. Han, C. Liu, J. Sun, Adv. Funct. Mater., 2018, 28, 1803471.
[28]	S. Wu, K. S. Hui, K. N. Hui, Adv. Sci., 2018, 5, 1700491.
[29]	J. Pang, A. Bachmatiuk, Y. Yin, B. Trzebicka, L. Zhao, L. Fu, R. G. Mendes, T. Gemming, Z. Liu, M. H. Rummeli, Adv. Energy Mater., 2018, 8, 1702093.
[30]	H. Liu, Y. Du, Y. Deng, P. D. Ye, Chem. Soc. Rev., 2015, 44, 2732-2743.
[31]	G. Kresse, J. Furthmüller, Comput. Mater. Sci., 1996, 6, 15-50.
[32]	G. Kresse, J. Furthmüller, Phys. Rev. B, 1996, 54, 11169-11186.
[33]	G. Kresse, D. Joubert, Phys. Rev. B, 1999, 59, 1758-1775.
[34]	P. E. Blöchl, Phys. Rev. B, 1994, 50, 17953-17979.
[35]	J. P. Perdew, J. A. Chevary, S. H. Vosko, K. A. Jackson, M. R. Pederson, D. J. Singh, C. Fiolhais, Phys. Rev. B, 1992, 46, 6671-6687.
[36]	J. P. Perdew, K. Burke, M. Ernzerhof, Phys. Rev. Lett., 1996, 77, 3865-3868.
[37]	S. Grimme, J. Antony, S. Ehrlich, H. Krieg, J. Chem. Phys., 2010, 132, 154104.
[38]	C. Xing, G. Jing, X. Liang, M. Qiu, Z. Li, R. Cao, X. Li, D. Fan, H. Zhang, Nanoscale, 2017, 9, 8096-8101.
[39]	Z. Sun, T. Liao, Y. Dou, S. M. Hwang, M.-S. Park, L. Jiang, J. H. Kim, S. X. Dou, Nat. Commun., 2014, 5, 3813.
[40]	W. Yuan, M. Zhao, J. Yuan, C. M. Li, J. Power Sources, 2016, 319, 159-167.
[41]	V. Georgakilas, J. N. Tiwari, K. C. Kemp, J. A. Perman, A. B. Bourlinos, K. S. Kim, R. Zboril, Chem. Rev., 2016, 116, 5464-5519.
[42]	A. Favron, E. Gaufres, F. Fossard, A.-L. Phaneuf-L'Heureux, N. Y. W. Tang, P. L. Levesque, A. Loiseau, R. Leonelli, S. Francoeur, R. Martel, Nat. Mater., 2015, 14, 826-832.
[43]	Y. Li, W. Qiu, F. Qin, H. Fang, V. G. Hadjiev, D. Litvinov, J. Bao, J. Phys. Chem. C, 2016, 120, 4511-4516.
[44]	M. A. Ramos-Docampo, B. Rivas-Murias, B. Rodríguez-González, V. Salgueiriño, CrystEngComm, 2017, 19, 5542-5548.
[45]	B. Rivas-Murias, V. Salgueiriño, J. Raman Spectrosc., 2017, 48, 837-841.
[46]	N. Feng, X. Liang, X. Pu, M. Li, M. Liu, Z. Cong, J. Sun, W. Song, W. Hu, J. Alloys Compd., 2019, 775, 1270-1276.
[47]	D. Li, L.-X. Ding, S. Wang, D. Cai, H. Wang, J. Mater. Chem. A, 2014, 2, 5625-5630.
[48]	H. Liu, Y. Zou, L. Tao, Z. Ma, D. Liu, P. Zhou, H. Liu, S. Wang, Small, 2017, 13, 1700758.
[49]	L. Cao, Q. Kang, J. Li, J. Huang, Y. Cheng, Appl. Surf. Sci., 2018, 455, 96-105.
[50]	F. Shi, K. Huang, Y. Wang, W. Zhang, L. Li, X. Wang, S. Feng, ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces, 2019, 11, 17459-17466.
[51]	Y. Kuang, M. J. Kenney, Y. Meng, W.-H. Hung, Y. Liu, J. E. Huang, R. Prasanna, P. Li, Y. Li, L. Wang, M.-C. Lin, M. D. McGehee, X. Sun, H. Dai, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A., 2019, 116, 6624-6629.
[52]	A. Zagalskaya, V. Alexandrov, ACS Catal., 2020, 10, 3650-3657.
[53]	J. A. Gauthier, C. F. Dickens, L. D. Chen, A. D. Doyle, J. K. Nørskov, J. Phys. Chem. C, 2017, 121, 11455-11463.
[54]	B. Jiang, X. Fan, Q. Dang, F. Liao, Y. Li, H. Lin, Z. Kang, M. Shao, Nano Energy, 2020, 76, 105079.
[55]	A. Curcio, J. Wang, Z. Wang, Z. Zhang, A. Belotti, S. Pepe, M. B. Effat, Z. Shao, J. Lim, F. Ciucci, Adv. Funct. Mater., 2021, 31, 2008077.
[56]	L. Giordano, B. Han, M. Risch, W. T. Hong, R. R. Rao, K. A. Stoerzinger, Y. Shao-Horn, Catal. Today, 2016, 262, 2-10.
[57]	X. Gao, S. Yang, W. Zhang, R. Cao, Acta Phys.-Chim. Sin., 2021, 37, 2007031.

黑磷夹层氧化钴纳米片构筑电催化水氧化的仿生通道

Black phosphorus incorporated cobalt oxide: Biomimetic channels for electrocatalytic water oxidation

RichHTML

PDF

Supporting Information

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

扫码分享

图/表 7

参考文献

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

[1]	唐小龙, 李锋, 李方, 江燕斌, 余长林. 单原子催化剂在光催化和电催化合成过氧化氢中的研究进展[J]. 催化学报, 2023, 52(9): 79-98.
[2]	石靖, 郭煜华, 谢飞, 章名田, 张洪涛. 氧化还原活性配体的电子效应对钌催化水氧化反应的影响[J]. 催化学报, 2023, 52(9): 271-279.
[3]	张季, 俞爱民, 孙成华. 非金属掺杂石墨烯异核双原子催化剂氮还原特性研究[J]. 催化学报, 2023, 52(9): 263-270.
[4]	胡金念, 田玲婵, 王海燕, 孟洋, 梁锦霞, 朱纯, 李隽. MXene负载3d金属单原子高效氮还原电催化剂的理论筛选[J]. 催化学报, 2023, 52(9): 252-262.
[5]	洪岩, 王琦, 阚子旺, 张禹烁, 郭晶, 李思琦, 刘松, 李斌. 电化学氮还原氨反应催化剂的最新研究进展[J]. 催化学报, 2023, 52(9): 50-78.
[6]	刘勇, 赵晓丽, 隆昶, 王晓艳, 邓邦为, 李康璐, 孙艳娟, 董帆. 原位构筑动态Cu/Ce(OH)_x界面用于高活性、高选择性和高稳定性硝酸盐还原合成氨[J]. 催化学报, 2023, 52(9): 196-206.
[7]	高晖, 张恭, 程东方, 王永涛, 赵静, 李晓芝, 杜晓伟, 赵志坚, 王拓, 张鹏, 巩金龙. 构建Cu台阶位促进电催化CO₂还原制醇类化学品的研究[J]. 催化学报, 2023, 52(9): 187-195.
[8]	张雯, 宋彩彩, 王嘉蔚, 蔡舒婷, 高梦语, 冯有祥, 鲁统部. 双向主客体作用促进水溶液中选择性光催化CO₂还原与醇氧化[J]. 催化学报, 2023, 52(9): 176-186.
[9]	邹心仪, 顾均. 酸性条件下二氧化碳高效电还原策略[J]. 催化学报, 2023, 52(9): 14-31.
[10]	王潇涵, 田汉, 余旭, 陈立松, 崔香枝, 施剑林. 非晶相电催化剂在电解水领域的研究进展[J]. 催化学报, 2023, 51(8): 5-48.
[11]	韩璟怡, 管景奇. 通过表面镧改性和体相锰掺杂协助钴尖晶石酸性下析氧[J]. 催化学报, 2023, 51(8): 1-4.
[12]	周波, 石建巧, 姜一民, 肖磊, 逯宇轩, 董帆, 陈晨, 王特华, 王双印, 邹雨芹. 强化脱氢动力学实现超低电池电压和大电流密度下抗坏血酸电氧化[J]. 催化学报, 2023, 50(7): 372-380.
[13]	王元男, 王立娜, 张可新, 徐靖尧, 武倩楠, 谢周兵, 安伟, 梁宵, 邹晓新. 钙钛矿氧化物在水裂解反应中的电催化研究[J]. 催化学报, 2023, 50(7): 109-125.
[14]	周纳, 王家志, 张宁, 王志, 王恒国, 黄岗, 鲍迪, 钟海霞, 张新波. 富含缺陷的Cu@CuTCNQ复合材料增强电催化硝酸盐还原成氨[J]. 催化学报, 2023, 50(7): 324-333.
[15]	李轩, 蒋兴星, 孔艳, 孙建桔, 胡琪, 柴晓燕, 杨恒攀, 何传新. GaN/In₂O₃的界面工程用于高效电催化CO₂还原制备甲酸[J]. 催化学报, 2023, 50(7): 314-323.