实现塑料光重整与产氢耦合实际应用的关键要素

doi:10.1016/S1872-2067(25)64869-8

催化学报 ›› 2026, Vol. 80: 20-37.DOI: 10.1016/S1872-2067(25)64869-8

实现塑料光重整与产氢耦合实际应用的关键要素

张金鹏^a^,¹, 梁腾^b^,¹, 陈恬^a, 郭美君^a, 余乐^a, 佘萍^b^,^*(), 冉景润^a^,^*()

^a阿德莱德大学化学工程学院, 南澳阿德莱德, 澳大利亚
^b吉林大学化学学院, 无机合成与制备化学全国重点实验室, 吉林长春 130012, 中国

收稿日期:2025-07-30 接受日期:2025-09-10 出版日期:2026-01-18 发布日期:2025-12-26
通讯作者: *电子信箱: jingrun.ran@adelaide.edu.au (冉景润), sheping@jlu.edu.cn (佘萍).
作者简介:第一联系人：¹共同第一作者
基金资助:
澳大利亚研究委员会(ARC)发现项目计划(FT230100192);国家自然科学基金(22301099);吉林省教育厅(JJKH20241250KJ);中国CSC奖学金项目

Key components for realistic application of plastic photoreforming coupled with H₂ evolution

Jinpeng Zhang^a^,¹, Teng Liang^b^,¹, Jaenudin Ridwan^a, Tian Chen^a, Elhussein M. Hashem^a, Meijun Guo^a, Amin Talebian-Kiakalaieh^a, Le Yu^a, Ping She^b^,^*(), Jingrun Ran^a^,^*()

^aSchool of Chemical Engineering, The University of Adelaide, Adelaide 5005, South Australia, Australia
^bState Key Laboratory of Inorganic Synthesis and Preparative Chemistry, College of Chemistry, International Center of Future Science, Jilin University, Changchun 130012, Jilin, China

Received:2025-07-30 Accepted:2025-09-10 Online:2026-01-18 Published:2025-12-26
Contact: *E-mail: jingrun.ran@adelaide.edu.au (J. Ran), sheping@jlu.edu.cn (P. She).
About author:Ping She (College of Chemistry, Jilin University) received her bachelor’s degree from Jilin University in 2014. In 2018, she obtained her Ph.D. degree in engineering from Jilin University. She then completed post-doctoral work at Jilin University (Post Doctoral Innovative Talent Support Program of China from 2018 to 2021). Her research focuses on inorganic porous nanomaterial-based catalysis evolution.
Jingrun Ran (School of Chemical Engineering, The University of Adelaide) received his PhD degree in Chemical Engineering from the University of Adelaide. Currently, he is appointed as a Senior Lecturer in the School of Chemical Engineering at the University of Adelaide. In 2020-2024, he has been recognized as a Clarivate Highly Cited Researcher. In 2023, he was awarded the ARC Future Fellowship. He is leading a research group focused on the atomic-level design and fabrication of advanced photocatalysts towards various pivotal reactions (e.g., reforming plastics, reforming biomass, light alkane activation and CO₂ conversion) using renewable solar energy.
First author contact:¹These authors contributed equally.
Supported by:
Australian Research Council (ARC) through the Discovery Project program(FT230100192);National Natural Science Foundation of China(22301099);Department of Education of Jilin Province(JJKH20241250KJ);Chinese CSC Scholarship Program

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

当前, 全球能源结构仍主要依赖传统的不可再生化石燃料, 其过度使用引发了严重的能源危机, 并显著阻碍了全球可持续发展进程. 此外, 能源领域的温室气体排放约占全球排放总量的四分之三, 是全球应对气候变化的主要挑战之一. 在此背景下, 氢能因其清洁性、高能量密度和良好储存性, 被视为未来理想的能源载体. 光催化整体水分解因能直接利用可再生太阳能并实现零碳排放, 被认为是绿色制氢的理想途径. 塑料光重整与产氢耦合, 不仅能显著提高产氢速率, 还能将废塑料转化为有价值的小分子化学品, 同时解决能源与环境困境. 然而, 该领域仍处于探索阶段, 缺乏系统性总结与实际应用导向的研究框架. 因此, 需要密切关注该技术的关键环节, 以推动此技术走向实际应用.

本文首先简要介绍了塑料光重整与产氢耦合的基本原理; 然后, 总结了目前常用的塑料预处理策略: 物理、化学和生物预处理. 随后, 结合一些典型案例, 系统阐述当前在光催化剂设计中所采用的多种策略, 包括增强底物吸附、优化光吸收性能、促进电荷分离与传输、提升结构与反应稳定性、降低制备与生产成本以及利用人工智能与机器学习指导催化剂探索. 详细分析了太阳跟踪聚光装置、光催化反应器以及光催化模块的运行参数对实现实际应用的关键作用; 此外, 介绍了技术经济分析和生命周期在评估塑料光重整与产氢耦合实际应用的可行性与可持续性方面的关键作用; 最后, 重点讨论了该领域当前存在的挑战与发展机遇: (1) 需要更加经济、环保、高效的预处理策略; (2) 具有更高活性、稳定性和氧化选择性的光催化剂对于其实际应用至关重要; (3) 目前研究大多集中在光催化剂的评估, 而忽视了对反应器的研究, 未来需要探索新型反应器, 以满足实际应用的需要; (4) 混合组分塑料的研究应该被关注; (5) 光催化领域尚缺乏统一的光源标准, 而建立统一的辐照条件有望加速该领域的发展与成果的可比性; (6) 模块的组合需要跨学科的合作.

总体而言, 本文构建了塑料光重整的系统性框架, 为该技术从实验探索向实际应用转化提供了依据与指引, 同时也为实现绿色氢能开发与塑料资源化利用的双重目标提供一定的参考和借鉴.

关键词: 光催化, 塑料光重整, 析氢, 高值化学品, 多功能催化剂

Abstract:

Green hydrogen (H₂) energy plays an important role in combating climate change, promoting energy transition, and fostering sustainable development. Solar-driven plastic photoreforming afford an attractive solution, it overcomes the limitation of the slow oxygen evolution half-reaction in overall water splitting while tackling environmental pollution and resource waste caused by plastics. However, this technology still rests on the experimental stage, and the transition from laboratory to realistic application remains lacking systematic view. In this review, key components for plastic photoreforming, including plastic pretreatment routes, photocatalysts exploration, basic photocatalytic modules for the realistic application, and feasibility, are investigated. Finally, outlook in this area is discussed.

Key words: Photocatalysis, Plastic photoreforming, H₂ evolution, Value-added chemicals, Multifunctional catalysts

张金鹏, 梁腾, 陈恬, 郭美君, 余乐, 佘萍, 冉景润. 实现塑料光重整与产氢耦合实际应用的关键要素[J]. 催化学报, 2026, 80: 20-37.

Jinpeng Zhang, Teng Liang, Jaenudin Ridwan, Tian Chen, Elhussein M. Hashem, Meijun Guo, Amin Talebian-Kiakalaieh, Le Yu, Ping She, Jingrun Ran. Key components for realistic application of plastic photoreforming coupled with H₂ evolution[J]. Chinese Journal of Catalysis, 2026, 80: 20-37.

×
扫码分享

导出引用管理器 EndNote|Ris|BibTeX

链接本文: https://www.cjcatal.com/CN/10.1016/S1872-2067(25)64869-8

https://www.cjcatal.com/CN/Y2026/V80/I1/20

图/表 12

Fig. 1. Schematic image of fields related to practical applications on plastic photoreforming.

Fig. 2. Schematic of overall water splitting and plastic photoreforming.

Fig. 3. (a) Mechanical pretreatment of plastics to reduce plastic size. Reprinted with permission from Ref. [21]. Copyright 2024, Wiley-VCH. (b) Plasma pretreatment cleaves C-H bonds and forms -OH, O-C=O, and C=O groups in PE. Reprinted with permission from Ref. [29]. Copyright 2023, Wiley-VCH. (c) PE is hydrolyzed to dicarboxylic acid after pretreatment with HNO3. Reprinted with permission from Ref. [30]. Copyright 2022, American Chemical Society. (d) Mechanism of EG and TPA from PET pretreated with KOH. Reprinted with permission from Ref. [31]. Copyright 2023, American Chemical Society. (e) The monomers are obtained at the optimum pretreatment temperatures of LCC and Dura in 100 mmol L?1 carbonate buffer solution with pH = 8.5, respectively, and the influence of different pretreatment conditions (including plastic size, pretreatment method and time) on the depolymerization effect of plastics. Reprinted with permission from Ref. [32]. Copyright 2023, American Chemical Society.

Table 1 Photocatalysts for plastic photoreforming.

Photocatalysts	Light source	Plastic	Rate max. (H₂)	Chemicals	Stability (h)	Ref.
CdS/CdO_x	solar simulator	PET PLA PUR	12.4 ± 2.0 mmol g^-1 h^-1 64.3 ± 14.7 mmol g^-1 h^-1 3.22 ± 0.13 mmol g^-1 h^-1	formate, glycolate, ethanol, acetate, lactate Pyruvate-based formate, acetate, pyruvate, lactate	144	[19]
BiVO₄/MoO_x	300 W Xe lamp	PET	1.96 mmol g^-1 h^-1	formate, acetate	25	[22]
CPDs-C₃N₄	300 W Xe lamp	PET PLA	1034 ± 134 μmol g⁻¹ h⁻¹ 1326 ± 181 μmol g⁻¹ h⁻¹	glycolic acid, glycolaldehyde, ethanol —	216	[23]
NiCo₂S₃-Zn_xCd_1-_xS	300 W Xe lamp	PET PLA	57.0 mmol g⁻¹ h⁻¹ 106.0 mmol g⁻¹ h⁻¹	formate, glycolate, acetate pyruvate, acetate	45	[25]
FeSA-hCN	300 W Xe lamp	PE	42 μmol h^-1	carboxylic acid, ether, alkane, furanone	144	[26]
MoS₂/CdS	solar simulator	PET PLA PE	3.90 ± 0.07 mmol g^-1 h^-1 6.68 ± 0.10 mmol g^-1 h^-1 1.13 ± 0.06 mmol g^-1 h^-1	formate, acetate, glycolate formate formic acid	200	[30]
O-CuIn₅S₈	300 W Xe lamp	PET	2.57 ± 0.02 mmol g⁻¹ h⁻¹	formate, acetate, glycolate	25	[33]
PCN/WO₃	300 W Xe lamp	PLA	402.09 μmol g⁻¹ h⁻¹	acetate, formate	24	[34]
Cu/TiO₂	Solar simulator	PET	193.6 μmol g⁻¹ h⁻¹	formate, acetate, glycollate, lactate	25	[35]
Pd-CdS	300 W Xe lamp	PLA	49.8 μmol g⁻¹ h⁻¹	pyruvic acid-based	>100	[36]
d-NiPS₃/CdS	300 W Xe lamp	PET PLA	31.38 mmol g^-1 h^-1 39.76 mmol g^-1 h^-1	formate, acetate, glycolate acetate, pyruvate-based	>100	[37]
T-ZnSe	300 W Xe lamp	PET PLA	42 μmol h⁻¹ 54 μmol h⁻¹	formate, acetate, lactate, ethanol acetate, propionate-based	12	[38]
CN_x\|Ni₂P	Solar simulator	PET PLA	31.2 μmol g^-1 h^-1 32.9 μmol g^-1 h^-1	formate, glyoxal, glycolate, acetate formate, acetate	120	[39]
Ni₂P/ZnIn₂S₄	4 × 25W, LED	PLA PET PTT PBT	781.3 μmol g⁻¹ h⁻¹ 686.1 μmol g⁻¹ h⁻¹ 519.4 μmol g⁻¹ h⁻¹ 330.0 μmol g⁻¹ h⁻¹	pyruvic acid glycolate, formate, acetate malonate, 3-hydroxypropionate succinate, 4-hydroxybutyrate	20	[40]
Pt/g-C₃N₄	Solar simulator	PET	2000 μmol g⁻¹ h⁻¹	formic acid, acetic acid	20	[41]
Cu-SA/TiO₂ NPs	122 mW cm^-2	PET	3.45 mmol h^-1 m^-2	—	336	[42]
Pt₁/TiO₂ Pt_NPs/TiO₂	300 W Xe lamp 300 W Xe lamp	PET PET	51.8 μmol g⁻¹ h⁻¹ 219.1 μmol g⁻¹ h⁻¹	glyoxal, glyoxylate, lactate, acetate acetate	120 120	[43] [43]
CN-CNTs-NiMo	500 W Xe lamp	PET	90 μmol g⁻¹ h⁻¹	glyoxal, glycolate	20	[44]
ZnZn-Salen-Ni COF	300 W Xe lamp	PET	421.46 μmol g⁻¹ h⁻¹	formic acid	48	[45]
Pt SA/BCN100	300 W Xe lamp	PLA	993 μmol g⁻¹ h⁻¹	acetic acid	16	[46]
Ni₃S₄/ZnCdS	300 W Xe lamp	PLA	27.9 mmol g^-1 h^-1	pyruvate, acetate	15	[47]
		PET	17.4 mmol g^-1 h^-1	acetate, glycolate, formate
Ni_SA/CeO₂	300 W Xe lamp	PE	0.23 mmol h^-1	propionic acid, adipic acid	12	[48]

Table 1 Photocatalysts for plastic photoreforming.

Photocatalysts	Light source	Plastic	Rate max. (H₂)	Chemicals	Stability (h)	Ref.
CdS/CdO_x	solar simulator	PET PLA PUR	12.4 ± 2.0 mmol g^-1 h^-1 64.3 ± 14.7 mmol g^-1 h^-1 3.22 ± 0.13 mmol g^-1 h^-1	formate, glycolate, ethanol, acetate, lactate Pyruvate-based formate, acetate, pyruvate, lactate	144	[19]
BiVO₄/MoO_x	300 W Xe lamp	PET	1.96 mmol g^-1 h^-1	formate, acetate	25	[22]
CPDs-C₃N₄	300 W Xe lamp	PET PLA	1034 ± 134 μmol g⁻¹ h⁻¹ 1326 ± 181 μmol g⁻¹ h⁻¹	glycolic acid, glycolaldehyde, ethanol —	216	[23]
NiCo₂S₃-Zn_xCd_1-_xS	300 W Xe lamp	PET PLA	57.0 mmol g⁻¹ h⁻¹ 106.0 mmol g⁻¹ h⁻¹	formate, glycolate, acetate pyruvate, acetate	45	[25]
FeSA-hCN	300 W Xe lamp	PE	42 μmol h^-1	carboxylic acid, ether, alkane, furanone	144	[26]
MoS₂/CdS	solar simulator	PET PLA PE	3.90 ± 0.07 mmol g^-1 h^-1 6.68 ± 0.10 mmol g^-1 h^-1 1.13 ± 0.06 mmol g^-1 h^-1	formate, acetate, glycolate formate formic acid	200	[30]
O-CuIn₅S₈	300 W Xe lamp	PET	2.57 ± 0.02 mmol g⁻¹ h⁻¹	formate, acetate, glycolate	25	[33]
PCN/WO₃	300 W Xe lamp	PLA	402.09 μmol g⁻¹ h⁻¹	acetate, formate	24	[34]
Cu/TiO₂	Solar simulator	PET	193.6 μmol g⁻¹ h⁻¹	formate, acetate, glycollate, lactate	25	[35]
Pd-CdS	300 W Xe lamp	PLA	49.8 μmol g⁻¹ h⁻¹	pyruvic acid-based	>100	[36]
d-NiPS₃/CdS	300 W Xe lamp	PET PLA	31.38 mmol g^-1 h^-1 39.76 mmol g^-1 h^-1	formate, acetate, glycolate acetate, pyruvate-based	>100	[37]
T-ZnSe	300 W Xe lamp	PET PLA	42 μmol h⁻¹ 54 μmol h⁻¹	formate, acetate, lactate, ethanol acetate, propionate-based	12	[38]
CN_x\|Ni₂P	Solar simulator	PET PLA	31.2 μmol g^-1 h^-1 32.9 μmol g^-1 h^-1	formate, glyoxal, glycolate, acetate formate, acetate	120	[39]
Ni₂P/ZnIn₂S₄	4 × 25W, LED	PLA PET PTT PBT	781.3 μmol g⁻¹ h⁻¹ 686.1 μmol g⁻¹ h⁻¹ 519.4 μmol g⁻¹ h⁻¹ 330.0 μmol g⁻¹ h⁻¹	pyruvic acid glycolate, formate, acetate malonate, 3-hydroxypropionate succinate, 4-hydroxybutyrate	20	[40]
Pt/g-C₃N₄	Solar simulator	PET	2000 μmol g⁻¹ h⁻¹	formic acid, acetic acid	20	[41]
Cu-SA/TiO₂ NPs	122 mW cm^-2	PET	3.45 mmol h^-1 m^-2	—	336	[42]
Pt₁/TiO₂ Pt_NPs/TiO₂	300 W Xe lamp 300 W Xe lamp	PET PET	51.8 μmol g⁻¹ h⁻¹ 219.1 μmol g⁻¹ h⁻¹	glyoxal, glyoxylate, lactate, acetate acetate	120 120	[43] [43]
CN-CNTs-NiMo	500 W Xe lamp	PET	90 μmol g⁻¹ h⁻¹	glyoxal, glycolate	20	[44]
ZnZn-Salen-Ni COF	300 W Xe lamp	PET	421.46 μmol g⁻¹ h⁻¹	formic acid	48	[45]
Pt SA/BCN100	300 W Xe lamp	PLA	993 μmol g⁻¹ h⁻¹	acetic acid	16	[46]
Ni₃S₄/ZnCdS	300 W Xe lamp	PLA	27.9 mmol g^-1 h^-1	pyruvate, acetate	15	[47]
		PET	17.4 mmol g^-1 h^-1	acetate, glycolate, formate
Ni_SA/CeO₂	300 W Xe lamp	PE	0.23 mmol h^-1	propionic acid, adipic acid	12	[48]

Fig. 4. (a) Chronological development of photocatalysts for plastic reforming. Reprinted with permission from Ref. [19,33]. Copyright 2018 and 2023, Royal Society of Chemistry. Reprinted with permission from Ref. [30,32,36,37,39,41,46]. Copyright 2019, 2022, 2023, 2024 and 2025, American Chemical Society. Reprinted with permission from Ref. [35]. Copyright 2024, Elsevier. Reprinted with permission from Refs. [47,49]. Copyright 2021 and 2025, Wiley. (b) Trends in publications in recent years related to the keywords “photocatalysis” include “plastic” (The data based on Web of Science). (c) Schematic image of photocatalyst exploration for plastic photo-reforming.

Fig. 5. (a) Schematic illustration of BiVO4/MoOx photoreforming pretreated PET plastic into H2 and chemicals. (b) Effect of MoOx loading on H2O-TPD results. Reprinted with permission from Ref. [22]. Copyright 2024, Elsevier. (c) Theoretical diagram of O doping site in CuIn5S8. (d) Band structure diagram of CuIn5S8 before and after doping with O. Reprinted with permission from Ref. [33]. Copyright 2023, Royal Society of Chemistry. (e) Theoretical model of heterostructure photocatalyst MoS2/CdxZn1-xS containing CdxZn1-xS solid solution. (f) Effect of Cd/Zn content ratio in CdxZn1-xS on band structure. Reprinted with permission from Ref. [49]. Copyright 2021, Wiley-VCH. (g) Cell structure of anatase TiO2 and Au/TiO2 (after doping Au nanoparticles). (h) Absorption spectra of TiO2 and Au/TiO2. Reprinted with permission from Ref. [50]. Copyright 2023, Elsevier.

Fig. 6. (a) Synthesis illustration of PCN/WO3 heterostructure photocatalysts. (b) Z-scheme charge transfer mechanism in PCN/WO3 heterostructure. Reprinted with permission from Ref. [34]. Copyright 2024, Springer Nature. (c) Preparation procedure of Cu1-O4 SAC. (d) Photocatalysis process over SACs. Reprinted with permission from Ref. [35]. Copyright 2024, Elsevier. (e) H2 yield of CdS loaded with different cocatalysts after 8 h photo-reforming. (f) k2-weighted Pd K-edge Fourier-transformed EXAFS spectra of different Pd species in R space. Reprinted with permission from Ref. [36]. Copyright 2024, American Chemical Society. (g) HAADF-STEM image of T-ZnSe. (h) XRD patterns of T-ZnSe and S-ZnSe. H2 (i) and organic acid (j) yields from PLA and PET photo-reforming by T-ZnSe and S-ZnSe. Reprinted with permission from Ref. [38]. Copyright 2024, Royal Society of Chemistry.

Fig. 7. (a) Schematic image of floatable photocatalytic nanocomposites. (b) H2 evolution through PET reforming. Reprinted with permission from Ref. [42]. Copyright 2023, Springer Nature. (c) Schematic of the conversion to single atom and nanoparticles on CeO2 (100) and CeO2 (111), respectively. Reprinted with permission from Ref. [77]. Copyright 2022, Wiley. (d) Preparation process of PDMS microreactor. Reprinted with permission from Ref. Copyright 2023, Elsevier. Continuous flow (e) and batch preparation routes (f). Reprinted with permission from Refs. [78,79]. Copyright 2023, Elsevier.

Fig. 8. (a) Schematic diagram of a machine learning process. Reprinted with permission from Ref. [90]. Copyright 2023, Springer Nature. (b) Theoretical calculation guided by AI. Reprinted with permission from Ref. [91]. Copyright 2025, Wiley. (c) A machine learning and AI-guided photocatalysis experimental platform. Reprinted with permission from Ref. [93]. Copyright 2024, Science.

Fig. 9. Schematic of basic photocatalytic modules for practical application of plastic reforming coupled with H2 production.

Fig. 10. (a) Concentrated solar power technology for promoting photocatalytic reactions. Reprinted with permission from Ref. [101]. Copyright 2024, MDPI. Image of suspended reactor (b) (Reprinted with permission from Ref. [39]. Copyright 2019, American Chemical Society) and immobilized reactor (c) (Reprinted with permission from Ref. [32]. Copyright 2023, American Chemical Society).

Fig. 11. (a) Pilot plant model for photoreforming of mixed waste (plastic, food waste, and biomass). (b) A sensitivity analysis was conducted for each parameter with respect to H2 production cost, carbon footprint, and EROI (blue indicating optimistic scenarios; red indicating pessimistic scenarios). The hollow circles in the ‘catalyst reuse’ section illustrate the impact of utilizing the more expensive TiO2|Pt photocatalyst in H2O. Photoreforming in 1 mol L?1 NaOH is examined only in the ‘NaOH reuse’ case. Reprinted with permission from Ref. Copyright 2020, Springer Nature [4].

参考文献

[1]	P. E. Brockway, A. Owen, L. I. Brand-Correa, L. Hardt, Nat. Energy, 2019, 4, 612-621.
[2]	S. Zhao, S.-S. Shen, L. Han, B.-C. Tian, N. Li, W. Chen, X.-B. Li, Rare Metals, 2024, 43, 4038-4055.
[3]	J. Choi, W. Jung, S. Gonzalez-Carrero, J. R. Durrant, H. Cha, T. Park, Energy Environ. Sci., 2024, 17, 7999-8018.
[4]	T. Uekert, C. M. Pichler, T. Schubert, E. Reisner, Nat. Sustain., 2021, 4, 383-391.
[5]	B.-H. Lee, S. Park, M. Kim, A. K. Sinha, S. C. Lee, E. Jung, W. J. Chang, K.-S. Lee, J. H. Kim, S.-P. Cho, H. Kim, K. T. Nam, T. Hyeon, Nat. Mater., 2019, 18, 620-626.
[6]	X. Wang, L. Chen, S. Y. Chong, M. A. Little, Y. Wu, W.-H. Zhu, R. Clowes, Y. Yan, M. A. Zwijnenburg, R. S. Sprick, A. I. Cooper, Nat. Chem., 2018, 10, 1180-1189.
[7]	H. Liu, C. Xu, D. Li, H.-L. Jiang, Angew. Chem. Int. Ed., 2018, 57, 5379-5383.
[8]	E. MacArthur, Science, 2017, 358, 843.
[9]	H. Ran, X. Sun, M. Zheng, Y. Jing, ACS Catal., 2025, 15, 8551-8585.
[10]	Y. Shi, X. Diao, N. Ji, H. Ding, Z. Ya, D. Xu, R. Wei, K. Cao, S. Zhang, ACS Catal., 2025, 15, 841-868.
[11]	M.-Y. Qi, M. Conte, M. Anpo, Z.-R. Tang, Y.-J. Xu, Chem. Rev., 2021, 121, 13051-13085.
[12]	Y. Tang, W. Wang, J. Ran, C. Peng, Z. Xu, W. Chu, Energy Environ. Sci., 2024, 17, 6482-6498.
[13]	J. Teng, W. Li, Z. Wei, D. Hao, L. Jing, Y. Liu, H. Dai, Y. Zhu, T. Ma, J. Deng, Angew. Chem. Int. Ed., 2024, 63, e202416039.
[14]	Y. Guo, J. Sun, T. Guo, Y. Liu, Z. Yao, Angew. Chem. Int. Ed., 2024, 63, e202319664.
[15]	H. Wang, X. Zhang, Y. Xie, Mater. Sci. Eng.: R Rep., 2018, 130, 1-39.
[16]	J. Ran, A. Talebian-Kiakalaieh, S. Zhang, E. M. Hashem, M. Guo, S.-Z. Qiao, Chem. Sci., 2024, 15, 1611-1637.
[17]	Z. Ya, S. Zhang, D. Xu, H. Wang, M. Li, ACS Catal., 2025, 15, 5339-5369.
[18]	Y. Zhang, M.-Y. Qi, Z.-R. Tang, Y.-J. Xu, ACS Catal., 2023, 13, 3575-3590.
[19]	T. Uekert, M. F. Kuehnel, D. W. Wakerley, E. Reisner, Energy Environ. Sci., 2018, 11, 2853-2857.
[20]	X. Zhang, M. Jun, W. Zu, M. Kim, K. Lee, L. Y. S. Lee, Small, 2024, 20, 2403347.
[21]	T. K. Anh Nguyen, T. Trần-Phú, R. Daiyan, X. Minh Chau Ta, R. Amal, A. Tricoli, Angew. Chem. Int. Ed., 2024, 63, e202401746.
[22]	X. Liang, T. Gao, Y. Cui, Q. Dong, X. Li, A. Labidi, E. Lichtfouse, F. Li, F. Yu, C. Wang, Appl. Catal. B, 2024, 357, 124326.
[23]	M. Han, S. Zhu, C. Xia, B. Yang, Appl. Catal. B, 2022, 316, 121662.
[24]	J. Woodward, J. Li, J. Rothwell, R. Hurley, Nat. Sustain., 2021, 4, 793-802.
[25]	W. Su, Y. Zhang, A. Kuklin, Y. Xu, V. Gerasimov, Z. Ma, H. Zhang, H. Ågren, Y. Zhang, ACS Catal., 2024, 14, 13927-13939.
[26]	J. Lin, K. Hu, Y. Wang, W. Tian, T. Hall, X. Duan, H. Sun, H. Zhang, E. Cortés, S. Wang, Nat. Commun., 2024, 15, 8769.
[27]	S. Tang, Y.-S. Xu, X. Ling, L.-Y. Tang, X.-Z. Wang, Y.-X. Yu, W.-D. Zhang, J. Mater. Sci. Technol., 2024, 224, 1-9.
[28]	T. Tam Nguyen, K. Edalati, J. Catal., 2024, 440, 115808.
[29]	Y. Jiang, H. Zhang, L. Hong, J. Shao, B. Zhang, J. Yu, S. Chu, ChemSusChem, 2023, 16, e202300106.
[30]	M. Du, Y. Zhang, S. Kang, X. Guo, Y. Ma, M. Xing, Y. Zhu, Y. Chai, B. Qiu, ACS Catal., 2022, 12, 12823-12832.
[31]	H. Kang, A. Washington, M. D. Capobianco, X. Yan, V. V. Cruz, M. Weed, J. Johnson, G. Johns III, G. W. Brudvig, X. Pan, J. Gu, ACS Mater. Lett., 2023, 5, 3032-3041.
[32]	S. Bhattacharjee, C. Guo, E. Lam, J. M. Holstein, M. Rangel Pereira, C. M. Pichler, C. Pornrungroj, M. Rahaman, T. Uekert, F. Hollfelder, E. Reisner, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2023, 145, 20355-20364.
[33]	M. Du, M. Xing, W. Yuan, L. Zhang, T. Sun, T. Sheng, C. Zhou, B. Qiu, Green Chem., 2023, 25, 9818-9825.
[34]	R.-Z. Wang, Z. Lin, Y.-Q. Wang, K.-N. Zhang, G.-H. Zhang, J. Zhang, S. S. Mao, S.-H. Shen, Rare Met., 2024, 43, 3771-3783.
[35]	Z. Li, Y. Yang, C. Zhang, W. Fan, G. Li, J. Fang, L. Lu, Chem Catal., 2024, 4, 100902.
[36]	Y. Miao, Y. Zhao, J. Gao, J. Wang, T. Zhang, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2024, 146, 4842-4850.
[37]	S. Zhang, H. Li, L. Wang, J. Liu, G. Liang, K. Davey, J. Ran, S.-Z. Qiao, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2023, 145, 6410-6419.
[38]	E. Zhao, P. Yin, K. Du, N. Lan, Q. Wang, J. Guo, M. Wang, T. Ling, Green Chem., 2024, 26, 6779-6786.
[39]	T. Uekert, H. Kasap, E. Reisner, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2019, 141, 15201-15210.
[40]	C.-X. Liu, R. Shi, W. Ma, F. Liu, Y. Chen, Inorg. Chem. Front., 2023, 10, 4562-4568.
[41]	M. Li, S. Zhang, ACS Catal., 2024, 14, 6717-6727.
[42]	W. H. Lee, C. W. Lee, G. D. Cha, B.-H. Lee, J. H. Jeong, H. Park, J. Heo, M. S. Bootharaju, S.-H. Sunwoo, J. H. Kim, K. H. Ahn, D.-H. Kim, T. Hyeon, Nat. Nanotechnol., 2023, 18, 754-762.
[43]	X. Han, M. Jiang, H. Li, R. Li, N. H. M. Sulaiman, T. Zhang, H. Li, L. Zheng, J. Wei, L. He, X. Zhou, J. Colloid Interface Sci., 2024, 665, 204-218.
[44]	X. Gong, F. Tong, F. Ma, Y. Zhang, P. Zhou, Z. Wang, Y. Liu, P. Wang, H. Cheng, Y. Dai, Z. Zheng, B. Huang, Appl. Catal. B, 2022, 307, 121143.
[45]	M.-H. Qin, P. Huang, M. Zhang, C. Xiao, J.-Y. Chen, Y.-D. Zhou, M. Lu, J.-Y. Li, Y.-Q. Lan, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2025, 147, 29232-29240.
[46]	Z. Ya, M. Li, D. Xu, H. Wang, S. Zhang, ACS Nano, 2025, 19, 16011-16023.
[47]	Z. Ma, S. Zhan, Y. Zhang, A. Kuklin, Y. Chen, Y. Lin, H. Zhang, X. Ren, H. Ågren, Y. Zhang, Adv. Mater., 2025, 37, 2416581.
[48]	S. Yue, Y. Liu, Z. Zhao, G. Zhao, M. Yang, T. Zhang, F. Li, K. Liu, P. Wang, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A., 2025, 122, e2508636122.
[49]	Y. Li, S. Wan, C. Lin, Y. Gao, Y. Lu, L. Wang, K. Zhang, Sol. RRL, 2021, 5, 2000427.
[50]	E. M. N. T. Edirisooriya, P. S. Senanayake, H. B. Wang, M. R. Talipov, P. Xu, H. Wang, J. Environ. Chem. Eng., 2023, 11, 109580.
[51]	Y. Zhao, S. Zhang, Z. Wu, B. Zhu, G. Sun, J. Zhang, Chin. J. Catal., 2024, 60, 219-230.
[52]	D.-H. Lim, A. Bathla, H. Anwer, S. A. Younis, D. W. Boukhvalov, K.-H. Kim, Chin. J. Catal., 2024, 59, 303-323.
[53]	G. Yang, T. Chen, H. Liu, C. Xing, G. Yu, X. Li, Appl. Surf. Sci., 2023, 616, 156393.
[54]	K. Wang, Y. Wang, B. Yang, Z. Li, X. Qin, Q. Zhang, L. Lei, M. Qiu, G. Wu, Y. Hou, Energy Environ. Sci., 2022, 15, 2356-2365.
[55]	R. He, D. Xu, B. Cheng, J. Yu, W. Ho, Nanoscale Horiz., 2018, 3, 464-504.
[56]	S. T. Kochuveedu, Y. H. Jang, D. H. Kim, Chem. Soc. Rev., 2013, 42, 8467-8493.
[57]	G. Yu, J. Qian, P. Zhang, B. Zhang, W. Zhang, W. Yan, G. Liu, Nat. Commun., 2019, 10, 4912.
[58]	M. Li, Z. Han, Q. Hu, W. Fan, Q. Hu, D. He, Q. Chen, X. Jiao, Y. Xie, Chem. Soc. Rev., 2024, 53, 9964-9975.
[59]	Z. Jiang, B. Cheng, L. Zhang, Z. Zhang, C. Bie, Chin. J. Catal., 2023, 52, 32-49.
[60]	S. Li, C. Wang, K. Dong, P. Zhang, X. Chen, X. Li, Chin. J. Catal., 2023, 51, 101-112.
[61]	X. Li, W.-C. Cheong, X. Xu, H. Rao, P. She, S. Wang, J.-S. Qin, Mater. Sci. Eng. R Rep., 2025, 166, 101039.
[62]	E. Wang, Y.-C. Chu, W. Zhang, Y. Wei, C. Si, R. Palkovits, X.-P. Wu, Z. Chen, Chin. J. Catal., 2025, 74, 308-318.
[63]	H. Fu, J. Tian, Q. Zhang, Z. Zheng, H. Cheng, Y. Liu, B. Huang, P. Wang, Chin. J. Catal., 2024, 64, 143-151.
[64]	X. Tang, F. Li, F. Li, Y. Jiang, C. Yu, Chin. J. Catal., 2023, 52, 79-98.
[65]	Y. Liu, J. Yang, Y. Liu, J. Zheng, W. Lee, J. Shi, J. Horlyck, J. Xie, Y. Y. Tay, T. T. Tan, D. Yu, R. Mole, G. McIntyre, C. Zhang, C. Y. Toe, T. D. Waite, J. Scott, Y. Wang, T. Wu, S. Han, S. Li, Energy Environ. Sci., 2020, 13, 5080-5096.
[66]	Y. Tang, Z.-F. Xu, Y. Sun, C. Wang, Y. Guo, W. Hao, X. Tan, J. Ye, T. Yu, Energy Environ. Sci., 2024, 17, 7882-7894.
[67]	J. Chen, Z. Li, H. Yu, X. Wang, Y. Xie, W. Zhou, Mater. Sci. Eng. R Rep., 2024, 161, 100843.
[68]	X. Li, Y. Wan, F. Deng, Y. Zhou, P. Chen, F. Dong, J. Jiang, Chin. Chem. Lett., 2025, 36, 111418.
[69]	X. Jiao, Z. Hu, K. Zheng, J. Zhu, Y. Wu, X. Zhang, J. Hu, W. Yan, J. Zhu, Y. Sun, Y. Xie, Nano Lett., 2022, 22, 10066-10072.
[70]	S. Zhang, B. Johannessen, B. Xia, X. Gao, K. Davey, J. Ran, S.-Z. Qiao, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2024, 146, 32003-32012.
[71]	L. Cheng, Q. Xiang, Y. Liao, H. Zhang, Energy Environ. Sci., 2018, 11, 1362-1391.
[72]	H. Zhang, R. Zong, Y. Zhu, J. Phys. Chem. C, 2009, 113, 4605-4611.
[73]	H. Zhang, Y. Zhu, J. Phys. Chem. C, 2010, 114, 5822-5826.
[74]	D. Xu, B. Cheng, S. Cao, J. Yu, Appl. Catal. B, 2015, 164, 380-388.
[75]	D. Jing, L. Guo, J. Phys. Chem. B, 2006, 110, 11139-11145.
[76]	W. Zhong, Y. Huang, X. Wang, J. Fan, H. Yu, Chem. Commun., 2020, 56, 9316-9319.
[77]	B. Hu, K. Sun, Z. Zhuang, Z. Chen, S. Liu, W.-C. Cheong, C. Chen, M. Hu, X. Cao, J. Ma, R. Tu, X. Zheng, H. Xiao, X. Chen, Y. Cui, Q. Peng, C. Chen, Y. Li, Adv. Mater., 2022, 34, 2107721.
[78]	A. Singh, R. Gogoi, K. Sharma, N. Fourati, C. Zerrouki, S. Remita, P. Felix Siril, Sep. Purif. Technol., 2023, 323, 124459.
[79]	A. Singh, R. Gogoi, K. Sharma, S. K. Jena, N. Fourati, C. Zerrouki, S. Remita, P. F. Siril, J. Cleaner Prod., 2023, 428, 139476.
[80]	S. Guo, Y. Huang, D. Li, Z. Xie, Y. Jia, X. Wu, D. Xu, W. Shi, Chem. Commun., 2023, 59, 7791-7794.
[81]	M. Wen, J. Wang, R. Tong, D. Liu, H. Huang, Y. Yu, Z.-K. Zhou, P. K. Chu, X.-F. Yu, Adv. Sci., 2019, 6, 1801321.
[82]	M. T. A. Iapichino, R. Fiorenza, V. Patamia, G. Floresta, A. Gulino, M. Condorelli, G. Impellizzeri, G. Compagnini, S. Sciré, Catal. Commun., 2024, 187, 106850.
[83]	X. Kong, X. Liu, Y. Zheng, P. K. Chu, Y. Zhang, S. Wu, Mater. Sci. Eng. R Rep., 2021, 145, 100610.
[84]	L. Ge, Y. Ke, X. Li, Chem. Commun., 2023, 59, 5795-5806.
[85]	A. Jaison, A. Mohan, Y.-C. Lee, Mater. Sci. Eng. R Rep., 2024, 161, 100880.
[86]	Y. Liu, Z. Yang, X. Zou, Y. Lin, S. Ma, W. Zuo, Z. Zou, H. Wang, M. Avdeev, S. Shi, Mater. Sci. Eng. R Rep., 2025, 166, 101050.
[87]	H. Mai, T. C. Le, D. Chen, D. A. Winkler, R. A. Caruso, Chem. Rev., 2022, 122, 13478-13515.
[88]	X. Yu, Z. Wei, Y. Qin, X. Zhang, D. Hao, L. Jing, Y. Liu, H. Dai, J. Deng, Y. Zhu, Adv. Mater., 2025, 37, 2501494.
[89]	P. Baczewska, M. Kulczykowski, B. Zambroń, J. Jaszczewska-Adamczak, Z. Pakulski, R. Roszak, B. A. Grzybowski, J. Mlynarski, Angew. Chem. Int. Ed., 2024, 63, e202318487.
[90]	R. Kumar, A. K. Singh, NPJ Comput. Mater., 2021, 7, 197.
[91]	Y. Lee, X. Chen, S. M. Gericke, M. Li, D. N. Zakharov, A. R. Head, J. C. Yang, A. N. Alexandrova, Angew. Chem. Int. Ed., 2025, 64, e202501017.
[92]	B. J. Shields, J. Stevens, J. Li, M. Parasram, F. Damani, J. I. M. Alvarado, J. M. Janey, R. P. Adams, A. G. Doyle, Nature, 2021, 590, 89-96.
[93]	A. Slattery, Z. Wen, P. Tenblad, J. Sanjosé-Orduna, D. Pintossi, T. den Hartog, T. Noël, Science, 2024, 383, eadj1817.
[94]	D. Zhang, H. Li, H. Lu, Z. Yin, Z. Fusco, A. Riaz, K. Reuter, K. Catchpole, S. Karuturi, Energy Environ. Sci., 2023, 16, 5065-5075.
[95]	J.-M. Lu, H.-F. Wang, Q.-H. Guo, J.-W. Wang, T.-T. Li, K.-X. Chen, M.-T. Zhang, J.-B. Chen, Q.-N. Shi, Y. Huang, S.-W. Shi, G.-Y. Chen, J.-Z. Pan, Z. Lu, Q. Fang, Nat. Commun., 2024, 15, 8826.
[96]	A. Z. Hafez, A. M. Yousef, N. M. Harag, Renewable Sustainable Energy Rev., 2018, 91, 754-782.
[97]	W. Batayneh, A. Bataineh, I. Soliman, S. Abed Hafees, Autom. Constr., 2019, 98, 102-109.
[98]	T. Pavlović, D. Milosavljević, I. Radonjić, L. Pantić, A. Radivojević, M. Pavlović, Renewable Sustainable Energy Rev., 2013, 20, 201-218.
[99]	Q. J. Abdul-Ghafoor, S. H. Abed, S. Ali Kadhim, M. A. Al-Maliki, Results Eng., 2024, 23, 102543.
[100]	Q. Wei, Y. Yang, J. Hou, H. Liu, F. Cao, L. Zhao, Sol. Energy, 2017, 153, 215-223.
[101]	F. Meng, Y. Liu, J. Wang, X. Tan, H. Sun, S. Liu, S. Wang, J. Colloid Interface Sci., 2018, 532, 321-330.
[102]	D. Mateo, N. Morlanes, P. Maity, G. Shterk, O. F. Mohammed, J. Gascon, Adv. Funct. Mater., 2021, 31, 2008244.
[103]	Z. Zhu, Y. Xuan, X. Liu, K. Zhang, Y. Zhang, Q. Zhu, J. Wang, ChemPhysChem, 2022, 23, e202100851.
[104]	R. Rezaei, M. Mohseni, Appl. Catal. B, 2017, 205, 302-309.

实现塑料光重整与产氢耦合实际应用的关键要素

Key components for realistic application of plastic photoreforming coupled with H₂ evolution

RichHTML

PDF

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

扫码分享

图/表 12

参考文献

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

[1]	张洪文, 蔡颖慧, 李秉岳, 山巍, 唐华. Cu单原子与CuO纳米团簇协同增强TiO₂光催化析氢性能[J]. 催化学报, 2026, 83(4): 162-171.
[2]	刘彭, 段炼, 杨宝鹏, 孙铭伟, 陈根, 刘小鹤, 刘敏, 张宁. (CuGa)_xZn_1-2_xGa₂S₄半导体材料的表面电子结构调控及其光催化还原硝酸盐制氨性能[J]. 催化学报, 2026, 83(4): 172-182.
[3]	李伊馨, 邱健豪, 夏广路, 刘琪英, 方碧瑶, 刘梦, 陈晨, 姚建峰. 中空管状In₂O₃修饰氮化碳395 nm光催化木质素C-C键高产率裂解[J]. 催化学报, 2026, 83(4): 209-218.
[4]	谢文奥, 贾治芳, 舒畅, 王婷霞, 席建红, 蔡佳轩, 宋向阳, 车瑜, 王笑颜, 王科伟, 谭必恩. 氰基功能化的共价有机框架通过微环境调节增强光催化性能制备过氧化氢[J]. 催化学报, 2026, 83(4): 282-293.
[5]	李金河, 姚霞喜, 于晓慧, 周小松, 任伟, 王乐乐, 王伟康, 刘芹芹. Mo₂N QDs/ZnIn₂S₄异质结中的等离激元-激子-声子协同作用实现光生电子与空穴的同步高值化利用[J]. 催化学报, 2026, 83(4): 219-230.
[6]	Jegon Lee, Do-Hyun Kim, Seulgi Ji, Sangmoon Yoon, Seung Hyun Nam, Jucheol Park, Jin Young Oh, Seung Gyo Jeong, Jong-Seong Bae, Sang A. Lee, Heechae Choi, Woo Seok Choi. 激活BaRuO₃薄膜催化活性表面以促进碱性析氢反应[J]. 催化学报, 2026, 83(4): 341-350.
[7]	R. Kavitha, C. Manjunatha, S. Girish Kumar. 基于氧化锌的S型异质结: 设计原理、制备方法及光催化活性[J]. 催化学报, 2026, 83(4): 54-95.
[8]	李思娴, 段有雨, 梁新元, 李宇涵, 张蝶青. 光催化活性位点的原子结构解析与调控: 从精准识别到理性设计[J]. 催化学报, 2026, 83(4): 1-23.
[9]	唐克山, 邓莞沂, 王宁远, 夏阳, 吴新鹤, 杨恒. 富含氧空位的三嗪基-COF/TiO₂ S-型异质结用于高效光催化CO₂还原[J]. 催化学报, 2026, 83(4): 244-257.
[10]	许凯强, 朱文君, Mahmoud Sayed, 韩生. 一维S型光催化剂的设计与制备[J]. 催化学报, 2026, 83(4): 24-53.
[11]	谢可慧, 刘从学, 耿琰, 阚京兰, 王广博, 董育斌. 苯并三噻吩基共价有机框架连接结构调控实现高效光合成H₂O₂[J]. 催化学报, 2026, 83(4): 271-281.
[12]	陈春园, 王中辽, 马颖, 翁波, 陈士夫, 孟苏刚. 硫掺杂-氮空位协同增强二维/三维S型异质结光催化合成H₂O₂[J]. 催化学报, 2026, 82(3): 278-291.
[13]	李昊男, 高娃, 马康力, 雷健, Olim Ruzimuradov, Akhtam Samiev, 陈亚, 刘敬祥, 李越. g-C₃N₄/CoNi₂S₄中的界面Ni-N键用于增强光催化CO₂转化[J]. 催化学报, 2026, 82(3): 266-277.
[14]	张婧, 张锡东, 王开颜, 王雪飞, 王苹, 陈峰, 余火根. 柠檬酸的定向配位用于高效光合成过氧化氢以及高附加值β-酮戊二酸[J]. 催化学报, 2026, 82(3): 201-211.
[15]	殷付豪, 张迁宇, 徐茂, 魏书朋, 李翊, 陈鹏作, 赵彦英, 李本侠. 锚定在有序大孔In₂O₃中的协同Pd物种促进太阳能驱动的CO₂和H₂O转化[J]. 催化学报, 2026, 82(3): 238-250.

实现塑料光重整与产氢耦合实际应用的关键要素

Key components for realistic application of plastic photoreforming coupled with H2 evolution

RichHTML

PDF

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

扫码分享

图/表 12

参考文献

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

Key components for realistic application of plastic photoreforming coupled with H₂ evolution