表面增强拉曼光谱原位捕获Pt-NiO界面水煤气变换反应中的碳酸盐中间物种

doi:10.1016/S1872-2067(21)63964-5

催化学报 ›› 2022, Vol. 43 ›› Issue (8): 2010-2016.DOI: 10.1016/S1872-2067(21)63964-5

• 桥连热、光、电催化的表界面化学专栏 • 上一篇下一篇

表面增强拉曼光谱原位捕获Pt-NiO界面水煤气变换反应中的碳酸盐中间物种

覃思纳^a^,^†, 魏笛野^a^,^†, 魏杰^a, 林嘉盛^a, 陈清奇^a, 吴元菲^a, 金怀洲^a^,^b^,^$(), 张华^a^,^#(), 李剑锋^a^,^b^,^*()

^a厦门大学材料学院, 固体表面物理化学国家重点实验室, 谱学分析与仪器教育部重点实验室, 化学化工学院, 能源材料化学协同创新中心, 福建省特种先进材料重点实验室, 能源学院, 福建厦门361005
^b中国计量大学光学与电子科技学院, 浙江杭州310018

收稿日期:2021-07-20 接受日期:2021-10-21 出版日期:2022-08-18 发布日期:2022-06-20
通讯作者: 金怀洲,张华,李剑锋
作者简介:第一联系人：
^†共同第一作者
基金资助:
国家自然科学基金(21972117);国家自然科学基金(21925404);国家自然科学基金(22122205);国家自然科学基金(22021001);国家重点研发计划(2020YFB1505800);“111”引智计划(B17027);福建省自然科学基金(2019J01030);大连理工大学精细化工国家重点实验室开放课题(KF2002)

Direct identification of the carbonate intermediate during water-gas shift reaction at Pt-NiO interfaces using surface-enhanced Raman spectroscopy

Si-Na Qin^a^,^†, Di-Ye Wei^a^,^†, Jie Wei^a, Jia-Sheng Lin^a, Qing-Qi Chen^a, Yuan-Fei Wu^a, Huai-Zhou Jin^a^,^b^,^$(), Hua Zhang^a^,^#(), Jian-Feng Li^a^,^b^,^*()

^aCollege of Materials, State Key Laboratory of Physical Chemistry of Solid Surfaces, MOE Key Laboratory of Spectrochemical Analysis and Instrumentation, College of Chemistry and Chemical Engineering, iChEM, Fujian Key Laboratory of Advanced Materials, College of Energy,Xiamen University, Xiamen 361005, Fujian, China
^bCollege of Optical and Electronic Technology, China Jiliang University, Hangzhou 310018, Zhejiang, China

Received:2021-07-20 Accepted:2021-10-21 Online:2022-08-18 Published:2022-06-20
Contact: Huai-Zhou Jin, Hua Zhang, Jian-Feng Li
About author:First author contact:
^†Contributed equally to this work.
Supported by:
National Natural Science Foundation of China(21972117);National Natural Science Foundation of China(21925404);National Natural Science Foundation of China(22122205);National Natural Science Foundation of China(22021001);National Key Research and Development Program of China(2020YFB1505800);"111" Project(B17027);Natural Science Foundation of Fujian Province(2019J01030);State Key Laboratory of Fine Chemicals(KF2002)

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

水煤气变换反应(WGSR)是制备高纯氢的重要反应之一, 一直是人们的研究热点. 以Pt为代表的贵金属催化剂, 在低温条件下表现出优异的WGSR活性. 其中, Pt可还原性氧化物界面往往被认为是水煤气变换反应最高效的活性位点. 然而, 由于缺乏直接的光谱证据, 该界面处的水煤气变换反应分子机理仍然存在争议.

本文通过制备具有三元核壳结构的Au@Pt@NiO纳米结构, 在具有高表面增强拉曼效应的Au纳米颗粒表面构建了丰富的Pt-NiO界面, 成功实现了Pt-NiO界面处WGSR过程及其关键中间物种的原位表面增强拉曼光谱(SERS)研究. 通过控制镍前驱体的量, 结合透射电镜和元素面扫描表征, 制备了一系列具有不同NiO壳层厚度的Au@Pt@NiO纳米结构. 以CO作为探针分子, 利用原位SERS表征, 当镍前驱体添加量为0.05 mL时, 可以同时得到Pt‒C以及Ni‒O的拉曼信号, 说明此时NiO是以岛状形式沉积于Au@Pt表面, 从而构筑出丰富的Pt-NiO界面. 原位SERS测试结果表明, 当将此Au@Pt@NiO纳米粒子置于WGSR气氛时, 随着反应温度的升高, 在1065 cm^‒1处出现了碳酸根物种的拉曼信号. 而当将Au@Pt@NiO纳米粒子置于单独Ar, CO和气态水的气氛条件下时, 均未观察到与新物种相关的拉曼信号产生. 进一步研究结果表明, 碳酸根物种的拉曼信号强度随着反应温度的上升呈现先增加后减少的趋势, 且在130 ^oC便已出现(此时并未测到WGSR活性), 并在200 ^oC显示出最大值(WGSR的起燃温度). 同时, 在气氛切换实验结果表明, 若体系中先通入CO/Ar, 再切换成H₂O/Ar时, 可在Au@Pt@NiO表面观察到碳酸盐物种的生成; 反之, 若先通入H₂O/Ar, 再切换为CO/Ar时, 则无碳酸盐物种. 说明碳酸盐物种是通过吸附的CO与气态水反应生成的, 并且在催化剂表面可以稳定吸附, 需要在更高温度才可分解, 故碳酸盐的分解可能是WGSR中一个较为缓慢的步骤. 此外, 当将Au@Pt和Au@NiO置于WGSR气氛条件下进行对照实验, 并没有观察到碳酸盐物种生成. 这表明Pt-NiO界面可促进碳酸盐中间物种的形成, 从而导致该界面比纯Pt表面具有更高的水煤气变换反应活性. 本文研究结果加深了对WGSR机理的认识, 有望用于指导高效WGSR催化剂的设计.

关键词: 水煤气变换反应, 表面增强拉曼光谱, 核壳纳米结构, 原位表征, 碳酸盐中间物种

Abstract:

Noble metal-reducible oxide interfaces have been regarded as one of the most active sites for water-gas shift reaction. However, the molecular reaction mechanism of water-gas shift reaction at these interfaces still remains unclear. Herein, water-gas shift reaction at Pt-NiO interfaces has been in-situ explored using surface-enhanced Raman spectroscopy by construction of Au@Pt@NiO nanostructures. Direct Raman spectroscopic evidence demonstrates that water-gas shift reaction at Pt-NiO interfaces proceeds via an associative mechanism with the carbonate species as a key intermediate. The carbonate species is generated through the reaction of adsorbed CO with gaseous water, and its decomposition is a slow step in water-gas shift reaction. Moreover, the Pt-NiO interfaces would promote the formation of this carbonate intermediate, thus leading to a higher activity compared with pure Pt. This spectral information deepens the fundamental understanding of the reaction mechanism of water-gas shift reaction, which would promote the design of more efficient catalysts.

Key words: Water-gas shift reaction, Surface-enhanced Raman spectroscopy, Core-shell nanostructure, In-situ characterization, Carbonate intermediate

覃思纳, 魏笛野, 魏杰, 林嘉盛, 陈清奇, 吴元菲, 金怀洲, 张华, 李剑锋. 表面增强拉曼光谱原位捕获Pt-NiO界面水煤气变换反应中的碳酸盐中间物种[J]. 催化学报, 2022, 43(8): 2010-2016.

Si-Na Qin, Di-Ye Wei, Jie Wei, Jia-Sheng Lin, Qing-Qi Chen, Yuan-Fei Wu, Huai-Zhou Jin, Hua Zhang, Jian-Feng Li. Direct identification of the carbonate intermediate during water-gas shift reaction at Pt-NiO interfaces using surface-enhanced Raman spectroscopy[J]. Chinese Journal of Catalysis, 2022, 43(8): 2010-2016.

×
扫码分享

导出引用管理器 EndNote|Ris|BibTeX

链接本文: https://www.cjcatal.com/CN/10.1016/S1872-2067(21)63964-5

https://www.cjcatal.com/CN/Y2022/V43/I8/2010

图/表 4

Fig. 1. (a) Illustration of Au@Pt@NiO nanostructures and in-situ SERS study of WGSR at Pt-NiO interfaces. (b) TEM images of Au@Pt@NiO. (c) HAADF-STEM image and elemental maps of Au@Pt@NiO.

Fig. 2. (a) In-situ SERS spectra of CO adsorbed on the Au@NiO, Au@Pt, Au@Pt@NiO. Au@Pt@NiO-thin and Au@Pt@NiO-thick mean the Au@Au@Pt@NiO nanoparticles using 0.05 and 0.5 mL nickel precursors, respectively. (b) In-situ SERS spectra for WGSR over Au@Pt@NiO. (c) Normalized peak intensity of the 1065 cm-1 band and Pt-C band as a function of reaction temperature. The blue curve is the catalytic performance of WGSR.

Fig. 3. (a) In-situ SERS spectra for WGSR over Au@Pt NPs at the atmospheres of CO/H2O = 1/2. In-situ SERS spectra of Au@Pt@NiO NPs at the atmosphere of Ar (b), CO (c), H2O (d) alone.

Fig. 4. (a,c) In-situ SERS spectra of WGSR at Au@Pt@NiO under atmosphere switching conditions. (a) CO is first adsorbed at Au@Pt@NiO at room temperature, then the gas is changed to 2% H2O/Ar and the temperature is raised. (c) Au@Pt@NiO is first kept under 2% H2O/Ar, then the gas is changed to 1% CO and the temperature is raised. (b) Corresponding normalized intensity of the Raman bands for the adsorbed carbonate and CO species in (a) as a function of temperature. (d) Schematic of the proposed reaction mechanism WGSR at Pt-NiO interfaces.

参考文献

[1]	I. P. Jain, Int. J. Hydrogen Energy, 2009, 34, 7368-7378.
[2]	Y. Shi, M. Li, Y. Yu, B. Zhang, Energy Environ. Sci., 2020, 13, 4564-4582.
[3]	J. Shen, M. Wang, L. Zhao, J. Jiang, H. Liu, J. Liu, ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces, 2018, 10, 8786-8796.
[4]	Y. Zhai, D. Pierre, R. Si, W. Deng, P. Ferrin, A. U. Nilekar,; G. Peng, J. A. Herron, D. C. Bell, H. Saltsburg, M. Mavrikakis, M. Flytzani-Stephanopoulos, Science, 2010, 329, 1633-1636.
[5]	Q. Fu, H. Saltsburg, M. Flytzani-Stephanopoulos, Science, 2003, 301, 935-938.
[6]	T. Li, F. Chen, R. Lang, H. Wang, Y. Su, B. Qiao, A. Wang, T. Zhang, Angew. Chem. Int. Ed., 2020, 59, 7430-7434.
[7]	Y. Zhou, A. Chen, J. Ning, W. Shen, Chin. J. Catal., 2020, 41, 928-937.
[8]	L. Sun, J. Xu, X. Liu, B. Qiao, L. Li, Y. Ren, Q. Wan, J. Lin, S. Lin, X. Wang, H. Guo, T. Zhang, ACS Catal., 2021, 11, 5942-5950.
[9]	S. Yao, X. Zhang, W. Zhou, R. Gao, W. Xu, Y. Ye, L. Lin, X. Wen, P. Liu, B. Chen, E. Crumlin, J. Guo, Z. Zuo, W. Li, J. Xie, L. Lu, C. J. Kiely, L. Gu, C. Shi, J. A. Rodriguez, D. Ma, Science, 2017, 357, 389-393.
[10]	J. Ning, Y. Zhou, W. Shen, Sci. Chin. Chem. 2021, 64, 1103-1110.
[11]	J. A. Rodriguez, S. Ma, P. Liu, J. Hrbek, J. Evans, M. Perez, Science, 2007, 318, 1757-1760.
[12]	X.-P. Fu, L.-W. Guo, W.-W. Wang, C. Ma, C.-J. Jia, K. Wu, R. Si, L.-D. Sun, C.-H. Yan, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2019, 141, 4613-4623.
[13]	R. J. Gorte, S. Zhao, Catal. Today, 2005, 104, 18-24.
[14]	G. Jacobs, Appl. Catal. A, 2004, 268, 255-266.
[15]	Y. Chen, J. Cheng, P. Hu, H. Wang, Surf. Sci., 2008, 602, 2828-2834.
[16]	S. Aranifard, S. C. Ammal, A. Heyden, J. Catal., 2014, 309, 314-324.
[17]	C. M. Kalamaras, I. D. Gonzalez, R. M. Navarro, J. L. G. Fierro, A. M. Efstathiou, J. Phys. Chem. C, 2011, 115, 11595-11610.
[18]	C. M. Kalamaras, D. D. Dionysiou, A. M. Efstathiou, ACS Catal., 2012, 2, 2729-2742.
[19]	R. Leppelt, B. Schumacher, V. Plzak, M. Kinne, R. J. Behm, J. Catal., 2006, 244, 137-152.
[20]	A. A. Gokhale, J. A. Dumesic, M. Mavrikakis, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2008, 130, 1402-1414.
[21]	Y. Chen, H. Wang, R. Burch, C. Hardacre, P. Hu, Faraday Discuss., 2011, 152, 121-133.
[22]	K. Mudiyanselage, S. D. Senanayake, L. Feria, S. Kundu, A. E. Baber, J. Graciani, A. B. Vidal, S. Agnoli, J. Evans, R. Chang, S. Axnanda, Z. Liu, J. F. Sanz, P. Liu, J. A. Rodriguez, D. J. Stacchiola, Angew. Chem. Int. Ed., 2013, 52, 5101-5105.
[23]	A. Goguet, F. C. Meunier, D. Tibiletti, J. P. Breen, R. Burch, J. Phys. Chem. B, 2004, 108, 20240-20246.
[24]	F. C. Meunier, D. Tibiletti, A. Goguet, D. Reid, R. Burch, Appl. Catal. A, 2005, 289, 104-112.
[25]	G. Jacobs, U. M. Graham, E. Chenu, P. M. Patterson, A. Dozier, B. H. Davis, J. Catal., 2005, 229, 499-512.
[26]	A. Bruix, J. A. Rodriguez, P. J. Ramirez, S. D. Senanayake, J. Evans, J. B. Park, D. Stacchiola, P. Liu, J. Hrbek, F. Illas, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2012, 134, 8968-8974.
[27]	J. Vecchietti, A. Bonivardi, W. Xu, D. Stacchiola, J. J. Delgado, M. Calatayud, S. E. Collins, ACS Catal., 2014, 4, 2088-2096.
[28]	D. L. Jeanmaire, R. P. Van Duyne, J. Electroanal. Chem. Interfacial Electrochem., 1977, 84, 1-20.
[29]	H. Zhang, S. Duan, P. M. Radjenovic, Z.-Q. Tian, J.-F. Li, Acc. Chem. Res., 2020, 53, 729-739.
[30]	H. Zhang, X.-G. Zhang, J. Wei, C. Wang, S. Chen, H.-L. Sun, Y.-H. Wang, B.-H. Chen, Z.-L. Yang, D.-Y. Wu, J.-F. Li, Z.-Q. Tian, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2017, 139, 10339-10346.
[31]	H. Zhang, C. Wang, H.-L. Sun, G. Fu, S. Chen, Y.-J. Zhang, B.-H. Chen, J. R. Anema, Z.-L. Yang, J.-F. Li, Z.-Q. Tian, Nat. Commun., 2017, 8, 15447.
[32]	J.-C. Dong, X.-G. Zhang, V. Briega-Martos, X. Jin, J. Yang, S. Chen, Z.-L. Yang, D.-Y. Wu, J. M. Feliu, C. T. Williams, Z.-Q. Tian, J.-F. Li, Nat. Energy, 2018, 4, 60-67.
[33]	Y.-H. Wang, M.-M. Liang, Y.-J. Zhang, S. Chen, P. Radjenovic, H. Zhang, Z.-L. Yang, X.-S. Zhou, Z.-Q. Tian, J.-F. Li, Angew. Chem. Int. Ed., 2018, 57, 11257-11261.
[34]	Y. Li, Y. Hu, F. Shi, H. Li, W. Xie, J. Chen, Angew. Chem. Int. Ed., 2019, 58, 9049-9053.
[35]	W. Xie, B. Walkenfort, S. Schlucker, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2013, 135, 1657-1660.
[36]	G. Frens, Nature-Phys. Sci., 1973, 241, 20-22.
[37]	Z. Q. Tian, B. Ren, J. F. Li, Z. L. Yang, Chem. Commun., 2007, 3514-3534.
[38]	G. Chen, Y. Zhao, G. Fu, P. N. Duchesne, L. Gu, Y. Zheng, X. Weng, M. Chen, P. Zhang, C. W. Pao, J. F. Lee, N. Zheng, Science, 2014, 344, 495-499.
[39]	L. Cao, W. Liu, Q. Luo, R. Yin, B. Wang, J. Weissenrieder, M. Soldemo, H. Yan, Y. Lin, Z. Sun, C. Ma, W. Zhang, S. Chen, H. Wang, Q. Guan, T. Yao, S. Wei, J. Yang, J. Lu, Nature, 2019, 565, 631-635.
[40]	N. Dharmaraj, P. Prabu, S. Nagarajan, C. H. Kim, J. H. Park, H. Y. Kim, Mater. Sci. Eng. B, 2006, 128, 111-114.
[41]	P.-P. Fang, S. Duan, X.-D. Lin, J. R. Anema, J.-F. Li, O. Buriez, Y. Ding, F.-R. Fan, D.-Y. Wu, B. Ren, Z. L.Wang, C. Amatore, Z.-Q. Tian, Chem. Sci., 2011, 2, 531-539.
[42]	A. R. Davis, B. G. Oliver, J. Solution Chem., 1972, 1, 329-339.
[43]	X. Chen, J. Chen, N. M. Alghoraibi, D. A. Henckel, R. Zhang, U. O. Nwabara, K. E. Madsen, P. J. A. Kenis, S. C. Zimmerman, A. A. Gewirth, Nat. Catal., 2020, 4,20-27
[44]	A. Goguet, F. C. Meunier, D. Tibiletti, J. P. Breen, R. Burch, J. Phys. Chem. B, 2004, 108, 20240-20246.
[45]	F. C. Meunier, D. Tibiletti, A. Goguet, D. Reid, R. Burch, Appl. Catal. A, 2005, 289, 104-112.

表面增强拉曼光谱原位捕获Pt-NiO界面水煤气变换反应中的碳酸盐中间物种

Direct identification of the carbonate intermediate during water-gas shift reaction at Pt-NiO interfaces using surface-enhanced Raman spectroscopy

RichHTML

PDF

Supporting Information

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

扫码分享

图/表 4

参考文献

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

[1]	谢起贤, 任丹, 柏力晨, 格日乐, 周雯慧, 白璐, 谢微, 王军虎, Michael Grätzel, 罗景山. 镍铁层状双金属氢氧化物在不同pH电解液体系中的析氧反应[J]. 催化学报, 2023, 44(1): 127-138.
[2]	孙倩, 贾忱, 赵勇, 赵川. 单原子基催化剂用于电化学CO₂还原[J]. 催化学报, 2022, 43(7): 1547-1597.
[3]	何铭, 徐冰君, 陆奇. 结合原位拉曼光谱与反应性研究锡与氧化锡催化剂电催化二氧化碳还原中表面物种的作用[J]. 催化学报, 2022, 43(6): 1473-1477.
[4]	王春鹏, 王哲, 毛善俊, 陈志荣, 王勇. 多相催化剂活性位点的配位环境及其对催化性能的影响[J]. 催化学报, 2022, 43(4): 928-955.
[5]	张博, 吴运祯, 翟潘龙, 王晨, 孙立成, 侯军刚. 铋基催化剂的合理设计和电催化二氧化碳转化[J]. 催化学报, 2022, 43(12): 3062-3088.
[6]	苏海胜, 常晓侠, 徐冰君. 表面增强振动光谱在电催化领域的运用: 基本原理、挑战和展望[J]. 催化学报, 2022, 43(11): 2757-2771.
[7]	吴丽文, 黄茉莉, 杨云霄, 黄逸凡. 金属/聚电解质界面的原位电化学表面增强拉曼光谱[J]. 催化学报, 2022, 43(11): 2820-2825.
[8]	魏杰, 陈微, 周达, 蔡俊, 陈艳霞. 结构明确的Pt基电极在温和电化学条件下的表面重构[J]. 催化学报, 2022, 43(11): 2792-2801.
[9]	陈亨权, 邹列, 魏笛野, 郑灵灵, 吴元菲, 张华, 李剑锋. 原位拉曼光谱与X射线吸收光谱研究能源转换电催化反应[J]. 催化学报, 2022, 43(1): 33-46.
[10]	王中明, 王洪, 王笑笑, 陈旬, 于岩, 戴文新, 付贤智. 通过调节反应物气体吸附电子转移行为实现热驱动ZnO光催化CO还原和H₂氧化反应[J]. 催化学报, 2021, 42(9): 1538-1552.
[11]	郭玲玲, 虞静, 王伟伟, 刘家旭, 郭洪臣, 马超, 贾春江, 陈俊翔, 司锐. 负载于二氧化硅上的小尺寸氧化亚铜物种促进丙烯选择性氧化生成丙烯醛[J]. 催化学报, 2021, 42(2): 320-333.
[12]	郑仁垟, 谢在库. 多相催化时空演变的全生命周期表征策略[J]. 催化学报, 2021, 42(12): 2141-2148.
[13]	王嘉, 尤瑞, 千坤, 潘洋, 杨玖重, 黄伟新. Cl^-改性对Ag/Al₂O₃催化剂结构及其催化C₃H₆-SCR和H₂/C₃H₆-SCR反应性能的影响[J]. 催化学报, 2021, 42(12): 2242-2253.
[14]	卢发贵, 刘晰, 崔义, 陈立桅. 原位表征技术在异相催化中的应用[J]. 催化学报, 2019, 40(s1): 75-89.
[15]	张普, 卫怡, 蔡俊, 陈艳霞, 田中群. 电化学原位表面增强拉曼光谱研究Au@Pd纳米粒子薄膜电极上吸附CO的斯塔克效应[J]. 催化学报, 2016, 37(7): 1156-1165.